DOCSLIB.ORG

Water & Sewerage Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water & Sewerage Plan WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN Washington County, Maryland 2009 Update Prepared by the Washington County Planning Department PREFACE Washington County Water & Sewerage Plan 2009 Update The attached document is the 2009 Update to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. The Plan was last comprehensively updated in 1994. The drafting of this Update began in 2004 with the notification to all of the municipalities and service providers affected by the Plan. The vast majority of the information contained in the Plan is based on information provided by the municipalities and other service providers. The information presented in the plan is updated as of January 1, 2009 unless otherwise noted. All requests involving information compiled after January 1, 2009 will be addressed as necessary in subsequent individual amendments or as part of the next comprehensive update. The following is a synopsis of the content of the 2009 Plan Update: • Includes all individual map and text amendments since the adoption of the previous Update in 1994. • The Plan contains updated information provided by the municipalities and service providers. In those cases where service providers did not provide updated information, information from the 1994 Plan and subsequent amendments is carried over. • Contains updated land use, population, and physical features information based on the 2002 Washington County Comprehensive Plan for the County. • Provides information and links in regard to the status of water quality in Washington County, the Federal Clean Water Act, development of TMDLs, Source Water Assessments and water quality plans. • Filters information regarding locations of major facilities to address home land security concerns. • Incorporates the text of the Plan into an electronic format as well as providing updated service area and priority designation mapping based on GIS technologies. The new text provides internet links to up to date information by regulatory authorities. • Lays groundwork for future updates by providing references to plans and strategies for Enhanced Nutrient Removal, bubble permitting, nutrient trading, maximum loading, as well as other options in order to address Chesapeake Bay initiatives and to maximize service to meet the needs to serve the Urban and Town Growth Areas. • Includes reference to Washington County’s sewer capacity management plan. It is anticipated that another update to the Water & Sewerage Plan will occur in the near future to address Water Resources Element requirements once studies are completed by the County and municipalities and upon additional Comprehensive Plan updates. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I - GOALS AND ORGANIZATION........................................................... I-1 A. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................... I-1 B. GOALS.................................................................................................................... I-2 C. OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................................... I-3 D. ORGANIZATION................................................................................................. I-4 E. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES....................................................... I-7 1. Washington County (Unincorporated Areas) ......................................................... I-7 2. Town of Boonsboro ................................................................................................ I-9 3. Town of Clear Spring .............................................................................................. I-9 4. Town of Funkstown.............................................................................................. I-10 5. City of Hagerstown ............................................................................................... I-10 6. Town of Hancock.................................................................................................. I-10 7. Town of Keedysville.............................................................................................. I-11 8. Town of Smithsburg.............................................................................................. I-12 9. Town of Williamsport ........................................................................................... I-12 CHAPTER II - BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................................... II-1 A. PHYSICAL FEATURES ....................................................................................... II-1 1. Topography ............................................................................................................ II-1 2. Sensitive Areas ........................................................................................................ II-1 3. Soil Characteristics.................................................................................................. II-2 4. Suitability for on-lot sub-surface disposal systems .................................................. II-5 5. Surface Water Characteristics ............................................................................... II-10 6. Drainage Sheds...................................................................................................... II-11 7. Water Quality....................................................................................................... II-13 8. Potomac River Mainstem ..................................................................................... II-14 9. Antietam Creek .................................................................................................... II-15 10. Conococheague Creek ...................................................................................... II-15 11. Little Conococheague ....................................................................................... II-16 12. Licking Creek ................................................................................................... II-16 13. Tonoloway Creek............................................................................................. II-16 14. Little Tonoloway.............................................................................................. II-17 15. Sideling Hill Creek............................................................................................ II-17 16. Dargan Area Drainage ...................................................................................... II-17 17. Downsville Area Drainage................................................................................ II-17 18. Pinesburg Station Area Drainage ...................................................................... II-17 19. Greenspring Area Drainage .............................................................................. II-17 20. Timber Ridge Drainage Area............................................................................ II-18 21. Tonoloway Ridge Drainage Area ..................................................................... II-18 22. Groundwater Characteristics and Aquifers....................................................... II-20 23. Groundwater Quality ....................................................................................... II-23 24. Well Construction ............................................................................................ II-27 25. Groundwater Quality Planning, Design and Management............................... II-27 26. Source Water Assessments ................................................................................ II-30 27. Water Quality Plans.......................................................................................... II-30 28. TMDL............................................................................................................... II-31 B. POPULATION ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS............................................... II-32 C. LAND USE & GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY.............................. II-36 CHAPTER III - EXISTING AND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS............III-1 A. WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF WATER QUALITY..........III-1 1. EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREAS: .............................................................III-1 2. DEPARTMENT OF WATER QUALITY PLANS AND POLICIES TO IMPROVE WATER SERVICE AND ADDRESS STATE POLICY, STRATEGIES AND PROCEDURES..................................................................................................III-3 B. CITY OF HAGERSTOWN.................................................................................III-4 1. HAGERSTOWN WATER PRODUCTION AND............................................III-4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ..........................................................................................III-4 2. PLANNED WATER SERVICE AREA IMPROVEMENTS ..............................III-5 C. FUNKSTOWN.....................................................................................................III-6 D. WILLIAMSPORT.................................................................................................III-7 E. SMITHSBURG......................................................................................................III-7 F. FORT RITCHIE...................................................................................................III-7 G. BOONSBORO-KEEDYSVILLE ..........................................................................III-8 H. WEAVERTON.....................................................................................................III-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infiltration/Inflow Task Force Report
    INFILTRATION/INFLOW TASK FORCE REPORT A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MWRA MEMBER SEWER COMMUNITIES AND REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS MARCH 2001 INFILTRATION/INFLOW TASK FORCE REPORT A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MWRA MEMBER SEWER COMMUNITIES AND REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS MARCH 2001 Executive Summary This report is the product of the Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) Task Force. It has been developed through the cooperative efforts of the 43 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) member sewer communities, MWRA Advisory Board, The Wastewater Advisory Committee (WAC) to the MWRA, Charles River Watershed Association (CRWA), Fore River Watershed Association (FRWA), Mystic River Watershed Association (MRWA), Neponset River Watershed Association (NRWA), South Shore Chamber of Commerce (SSCC), Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and MWRA. The I/I Task Force recommends implementation of the regional I/I reduction goals and implementation strategies detailed in this report. The report outlines a regional I/I reduction plan with appropriate burdens and benefits for stakeholders. The report is intended to be a guidance document for use by local sewer communities, as well as other regional stakeholders, who may tailor appropriate aspects of the report recommendations to their unique situations. Severe storms in October 1996 and June 1998 led to the unusual circumstance of numerous sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) from local and MWRA collection systems. In the aftermath of these events, EPA and DEP began an aggressive effort to make MWRA regulate flows from community sewer systems. MWRA recommended cooperative efforts by local collection system operators, as well as regulators and environmental advocates, would be more effective than a prescriptive, enforcement based approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Sewerage Systems and Potential Application to Rural Louisiana Communities
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Senior Honors Theses Undergraduate Showcase 5-2018 Simplified Sewerage Systems and Potential Application to Rural Louisiana Communities Homero de Toledo Sobrinho University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation de Toledo Sobrinho, Homero, "Simplified Sewerage Systems and Potential Application to Rural Louisiana Communities" (2018). Senior Honors Theses. 100. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses/100 This Honors Thesis-Unrestricted is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Honors Thesis-Unrestricted in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Honors Thesis-Unrestricted has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIMPLIFIED SEWERAGE SYSTEMS AND POTENTIAL APPLICATION TO RURAL LOUISIANA COMMUNITIES An Honors Thesis Presented to the Department of Civil Engineering of the University of New Orleans In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science, with University High Honors And Honors in Civil Engineering by Homero de Toledo Sobrinho May 2018 Acknowledgments I would like to express my great appreciation of the help given by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY
    MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY ( ) David Foute advertised wool carding at Accommodation Factory, Dumb Quarter extended, Frederick-Town Herald, June 23, 1827. ADAMS FULLING MILL (9) Frederick Brown advertised wool carding at 6-1/4 cents per pound at the old establishment of Mr. Adams, about 2 miles south of New Market, Frederick-Town Herald, May 11, 1831, p. 4. He had offered fulling and dyeing there (Mrs. Adams’), Ibid., August 20, 1825. This was presumably the fulling mill shown on the 1808 Charles Varlé map on Bush Creek, 0.33 mile north of the present Weller Road, SE of Monrovia. The 1860 Bond map showed the Mrs. H. Norris wool factory, while the 1878 atlas showed Mrs. Norris with a grist and sawmill. ADLER ROPEWALK (F) A ropewalk operated by John Adler in 1819 was on South Market Street, Frederick. The building was occupied in 1976 by Federated Charities (See, Ralph F. Martz, “Richard Potts,” Frederick Post, May 11, 1976, p. A-7). ADELSPERGER MILL CO (5) This steam foundry and machine shop was listed in the 1860 census of manufactures with $14,000 capital investment and 25 employees; annual output was $5000 in castings and $25,000 in machinery. ADLUM STILL ( ) John Adlum advertised to sell two stills, 106-gallon and 49-gallon, Frederick-Town Herald, August 14, 1802. AETNA GLASS WORKS (7) Thomas Johnson purchased some of Amelung’s machinery and built a new Aetna Glass Works on Bush Creek, hauling sand from Ellicott City in empty wheat wagons. He later built another works on Tuscarora Creek, The Potomac, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Md Cracker Barrel 2005.Pdf
    • Bird's-Eye View Of Hagerstown's Golden Years • • Memories Of Washington County's "Town That Was" • MARYLAND l$2.50 • Sentinel of Washington County's Heritage • Feb./March 2005 P oi C> H n H c V Meet Us at the Friendly MARYLAND Cracker Barrel Bi-Monthly! Gather around the pot-bellied stove Grader Bar rel and the checkerboard with a barrel of Our 33rd year common crackers within easy reach and Volume 33 -- No. 4 enjoy the Maryland Cracker Barrel. Since June of 1971 this magazine has Published bi-monthly by been a gathering place for folks interested MARYLAND CRACKER in preserving the heritage of Washington BARREL, INC. 7749 Fairplay Road County. Boonsboro, MD 21713-2322 It is our goal to present the story of the (301)582-3885 individuals who have striven to give this region a heritage worthy of preservation. Editor and Publisher Frank Woodring Associate Editor Suanne Woodring Attention: Former Fairchild Employees Chad Woodring This summer we plan to focus on Fairchild Aircraft in Washing­ Donald Dayhoff ton County. We would appreciate if you would submit your fa­ Janet Dayhoff vorite memory of your association with Fairchild by June 1. Fred Kuhn Please include your name, address, department, and number of Bonnie Kuhn years spent with Fairchild. Bob Waring Betty Waring Contributing Writers Coming Richard Clem Jessie Robinette Spring of 2005 Blair Williamson Order Prior to March 1 Printed by to Receive Oak Printing, Inc. Pre-Publication Special 952 Frederick Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 $19.99 (Includes Tax and Shipping) Subscription Rate: $13.65 per year Orders Received Maryland Cracker Barrel After March 1 7749 Fairplay Road $22.99 Boonsboro, MD 21713 301-582-3885 Maryland Cracker Barrel 7749 Fairplay Road [email protected] Boonsboro, MD 21713 Images of America 301-582-3885 FRONT COVER: The photo PEN MAR depicts the east side of the first Images of America, PEN MAR contains 128 pages with more than block of North Potomac Street 200 pictures of historic Pen Mar Park along with the Western in Hagerstown.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Gambrill State Park
    Introduction A West Gambrill State Park is located along the eastern edge of the Blue Ridge b Physiographic Province. The Blue Ridge Mountains stretch from northern Georgia to southern Pennsylvania. The Blue Ridge is made up of folded Eas x t rocks that are broken in places by faults. In Maryland, the Blue Ridge b consists of two separate ridges-Catoctin Mountain, locally known as A B C Braddock Mountain on the east, and South Mountain to the west. The Blue Figure 1. Rocks of Gambrill State Park. A, Catoctin Formation. Green- Ridge is bordered on the east by the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The ish metamorphosed basalts. B, Loudoun Formation. Volcanic ash Piedmont is underlain by metamorphic rocks that were formed when the containing pebbles of lava (at A). C, Weverton Formation. Cross- 9 W Appalachian Mountains were uplifted more than 250 million years ago bedded sandstone (b=bedding, x=cross-bedding) . ever C ton Form (hereafter Ma). What we see from Catoctin Mountain today is the result of to weathering and erosion. As a result of this durability, the Weverton ation millions of years of erosion of those mountains. Formation represents the main ridge-forming layer on both Catoctin and Bedrock Layers South mountains of the Blue Ridge of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Nearly all of the rocks present in the park are assignable to three These ridges are erosional features left standing high after the softer or more geologic rock units, called formations. These are the Catoctin, the Loudoun, soluble rocks on either side were worn down by weathering and erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Points of Interest History Local Bike Shops
    WASHINGTON COUNTY, MD COUNTY, WASHINGTON A S C L HAG LI N CR CER HIGH W H MER MAGNOLIA IA VI E. MAGNOLIA A R GA VIE IR IR FA MAGNOL VE.. LINDSAY STREET AVE WELCOME TO WASHINGTON COUNTY WOOD BEL STREET ALLEY LANE Y CYPRESS EAST There’s no place in Maryland that’s better for bicycling IRVIN TERRACE WAYNE STREET WA RK POINTS OF INTEREST PA VENUE than Washington County. Whether you are a leisure cyclist A A A VE. VENUE VENUE VENUE HOLLEYMEAD A TERRACE A CT A MAGNOLI WILLOWBROOK WAY IR STREET VIN Y EAST CHARTRIDGE STREET seeking a near wilderness experience, a day rider looking for BROOKSIDE GLENWOOD ~NOT BUILT~ TERRACE WA VE. T A ROAD LAUREL MEALEY FORT FREDERICK STATE PARK WEST ON BOULEVARD AVENUE YSPRING LANE new roads and places to explore, or a tourist in search of a TTHEW THE DA COUR HILLCREST HILLCREST Y WIN HAMPT PL. BENJAMIN IR MA This stone fort provides a glimpse of the dangers and CIRCLE FR EAST VENUE KASINOF WEST VIN VILLAGE PL good weekend trip, Washington County has something for ROAD A DRIVE VIEW IR VENUE RUN HILL A CLAIR A NI hardships faced by the early settlers. Named in honor of VA BEL IRVIN EAST STREET WEST A you. Its historic towns, pleasant countryside, and miles of VENUE ON BOULEVARD SAINT DRIVE VENUE Frederick Calvert, the last Lord Baltimore, and garrisoned in HILLCR A PENNSYL EASTIRVIN quiet back roads invite you to simply relax and enjoy yourself. PARK EST COLUMBIA HAMILT LANE VALLEYBROOK RIDA AVENUE 1756, Fort Frederick gave shelter and protection to settlers PARK VENUE ON ROAD MC KEE A A VENUE VIEW on the frontier during the French and Indian War.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility - Concept Design Report Hagerstown, Maryland
    May 18, 2021 The Honorable Emily Keller Mayor, City of Hagerstown One East Franklin Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 RE: Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility - Concept Design Report Hagerstown, Maryland Dear Mayor Keller, The Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) is pleased to present the attached concept design report (the “Report”) for the Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility. The effort was undertaken pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Hagerstown and MSA dated October 1, 2019. The concept design and due diligence effort included: • Design and engineering services including geotechnical, environmental and utility location and capacity analysis. • Real estate / land acquisition analysis. • Cost estimating services. MSA engaged the following consultants to provide services toward the effort: • Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP (RK&K), in partnership with Populous, provided design and engineering services. • O’Connor Construction Management Incorporated (OCMI) provided cost estimating services. The Report is comprised of the following documents: • Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility Concept Design Report by RK&K dated January 2021. • Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility Project – Concept 1 Program Level Cost Estimate by OCMI dated January 2021. • Hagerstown Multi-Use Sports and Events Facility Project – Concept 4 Program Level Cost Estimate by OCMI dated January 2021. The methodology used to complete the effort was as follows: • RK&K and Populous developed four potential project execution concepts based on the facility program and characteristics of the selected site. o The consultants and MSA deemed Concept 1 to have the highest likely cost of construction. o Concept 4 was deemed by the consultants and MSA to have the lowest likely cost of construction.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Joseph
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2008 Joseph Poffenberger Farmstead Antietam National Battlefield Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Joseph Poffenberger Farmstead Antietam National Battlefield Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national
    [Show full text]
  • Classification
    F-687 Nov-08-2004 14:45 From-ANTI RM 4 LE 3014320313 T-911 P.002 / .. - UNITED STATtS DtPAjtTMHNTOFTHb INTtKIOR FOR NFS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ,ATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED / INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_____ NAME HISTORIC An tier am National Battlefield AND/OR COMMON " • • '• ' [LOCATION STREET ft NUMBER P. 0. Box 158 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Sharsburg VICINITY OF Sixth STATE m " „ COUNTY Maryland B Washington CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT _PUBUC JKOCCUPIED JXAGRICULTUHE —MUSEUM —BUILDINGIS) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL JKPARK .STRUCTURE 2BOTH .WORK IN PROGRESS .EDUCATIONAL ^PRIVATE RESIDENCE ^.SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE .ENTERTAINMENT ^RELIGIOUS —OBJECT JCIN PROCESS _~YE5: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT ^SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED JSYES: UNRESTRICTED .INDUSTRIAL .TRANSPORTATION —MILITARY MOTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: i National Capital Beginn/Mat-'fonal Park STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. CITY. TOWN, . STATE Washington, D.C,_20242 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY Of DEEO&ETC. Waahingt(m County STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Hageretown, Maryland H REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Partial representation lo State Historic Sites Survey OATE .FEDERAL &STATE —COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Maryland Historic Trust, 21 State Circle CITY. TOWN STATE Awtapolls, Maryland Nov-08-Z004 14:45 From-ANT I RM & LE 3014320313 T-911 P.003/009 F-687 H DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT ^DETERIORATED _UN ALTER ED X.GOOO _RUINS JLALTERED —FAIR __UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL OF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Antietam National Battlefield is located near the Maryland hank, of the Potomac River and along Antietam Creek north and east of the village of Sharpsburg, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Lights & Lore Media
    Media Kit Table of Contents About the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area ................................................................................. 3 About this Media Kit ......................................................................................................................... 4 Winter Lights & Lore: Selected Events ............................................................................................... 5 Memorial Illumination ................................................................................................................................5 Newcomer House Illumination ...................................................................................................................5 Captain Flagg’s US Quartermaster City, 1864: Prospects of Peace ................................................................5 Civil War Christmas in Shepherdstown ........................................................................................................6 Battle of Shepherdstown Illumination .........................................................................................................6 Civil War Encampment ...............................................................................................................................7 Traditional Village Christmas ......................................................................................................................7 While Visions of Sugar Plums Danced in Their Heads ...................................................................................7
    [Show full text]