DOCSLIB.ORG

2018-06-15 Top 10.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018-06-15 Top 10.Pdf NCSEJ WEEKLY TOP 10 Washington, D.C. June 15, 2018 Ukrainian Interior Ministry, WJC agree to join forces to counter anti-Semitism Ukrinform, June 12, 2018 https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/2479209-ukrainian-interior-ministry-world-jewish-congress-agree-to-join- forces-to-counter-antisemitism.html The Interior Ministry of Ukraine and the World Jewish Congress have agreed to unite efforts to combat xenophobia and anti-Semitism. Interior Minister Arsen Avakov wrote this on Twitter after his meeting with Director General of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) Robert Singer. "During a working meeting with Robert Singer, we agreed to unite efforts to combat xenophobia and anti-Semitism as tools for a hybrid war. The Ukrainian Interior Ministry was highly praised by the WJC regarding the response to anti- Semitic excesses in the country," Avakov wrote. Earlier Avakov said that anti-Semitism was unacceptable in modern democratic Ukraine. Czech shoah survivor warns against rising tide of antisemitism and racism across Europe Doris Grozdanovicova, 92, one of few living survivors of SS concentration camp in Terezin, returned this week to unveil memorial By Kim Sengupta UK Independent, June 9, 2018 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/holocaust-anti-semitism-racism-europe-czech-republic-nazis- a8390101.html In 1942, at the age of 16, Doris Grozdanovicova was arrested with her family and sent off to the SS concentration camp at the Czech town of Terezin. Tens of thousands were sent there to die there during the Nazi occupation, including her mother. Another 90,000, among them her father, were sent on to be murdered at Auschwitz and Treblinka in Poland. Ms Grozdanovicova, one of the very few survivors of the camp still alive, travelled to Terezin this week to unveil a memorial to those who lost their lives. She had just returned from a visit to Germany where she had been speaking to school pupils about the terrible damage caused by antisemitism, racism and intolerance, and stressing the need to learn lessons from the past. “It is sad to say, but we need to remember now what happened more than ever. It is very depressing to see what is happening in Europe, the extremism and the effect it’s having,” she said. “So I try and do my bit while I am still alive, go and talk to people, at colleges and schools about what happened. The harm that was done.” Terezin was used as a transit camp by the Nazis to send Jewish people first from Germany and Austria, and then from the Netherlands and Denmark after those countries were occupied. Among the 150,000 who passed through, there were 15,000 children. Almost none of them returned home. “It was a place not just for Czechs, of course, but people from other places, sent from one part of Europe to die in another part,” said the 92-year-old. “So many countries in Europe suffered because of this hatred, I am sorry to see this hatred again in Europe in my lifetime.” The rise of populism across the continent has seen right-wing nationalist parties win political power in a number of states, the latest Slovenia where the anti-immigration Slovenian Democratic Party is due to form a coalition government. The party’s leader, Janez Jansa, is an ally of Hungary’s hard-line prime minister, Viktor Orban, whose electoral success has been one of the most marked in the surge of nationalist victories in Poland, Austria and Italy. The common denominator in the policies of these parties in a fervent anti-migrant rhetoric, even when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers, and a strident opposition to accepting them under the European Union’s quota system. There has also been an accompanying surge of antisemitism, not just in those countries but elsewhere, with physical attacks, the desecration of cemeteries and Nazi slogans heard in marches. In Warsaw, the Senate in February passed a bill which would make illegal to accuse the Polish people of complicity in Nazi-era war crimes, a move which has led to international condemnation and accusations of attempting to airbrush history and pandering to right-wing, antisemitic votes. Last November, on Poland’s Independence Day, members of far-right groups from across Europe took part in a march in Warsaw with chants of “Sieg Heil”, “Clean blood”, “Jews out of Poland” as well as “White Europe” and “Refugees out”. Around 90 per cent of the Jewish population were exterminated during the War, leaving a community now of just under 10,000. Police responded by arresting 45 anti-racist demonstrators, while the country’s foreign ministry declared the day had been “a great celebration of Poles, differing in their views, but united around the common values of freedom and loyalty to an independent homeland.” None of the hard-right marchers were detained. When a reporter asked Poland’s interior minister what he thought of the far-right banners, the minister responded: “That’s your opinion because you behave like an activist.” At the unveiling of the Terezin memorial in early June, Dr Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress, said: “The lessons of the Holocaust have been forgotten, facing the sands of time, and a new open and mainstream antisemitism is spreading. “It has reached an unprecedented and alarming scale, Jewish communities across Europe require massive protection and security.” The targeting of minority communities, he wanted to point out, will only spread unless action is taken. “This has become a sign of a profound social sickness and is a danger not only to Jews, but to countries and citizens across the globe. Hatred and intolerance are everyone’s problem and we expect layers of civil society to be at the forefront of this battle.” Tomas Kraus, executive director of the Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Republic, wanted to stress: “It is worth remembering that we the Jews have always been the first in Europe to suffer from the haters, but we were never the last. “Those who want to target and persecute communities don’t just stop with one set of minorities.” There has been a rise in antisemitic acts in the Czech Republic – attacks on properties, a rise of threats on the internet, and abusive remarks by a few politicians – but the level remains relatively low compared to some other countries in the continent. “There was more antisemitism in this country in the past, and there are some worrying aspects like attacks on George Soros, but we are lucky in relation to other places that there have been no terrorist attacks against us for example and the main parties have been very supportive,” he said, referring to the Jewish Hungarian-American billionaire who is a figure of hate for the far-right. “But we are part of the same interconnected continent, and we can see very worrying things developing across Europe.” The far-right in the Czech Republic did surprisingly well at the last election, with around 11 per cent of the votes, at the expense of traditional parties. The leader of the successful anti-immigrant and anti-EU Freedom and Democratic Party (SPD) had, among other things, urged people to walk pigs around mosques and stop eating kebabs to show their dislike of Islam. “We want to stop any Islamisation of the Czech Republic; we push for zero tolerance of migration ... The European Union can’t be reformed, it only dictates to us. We refuse a multicultural European superstate,” said the leader. The leader, Tomio Okamura, is of Japanese and Czech parentage and spent part of his childhood in Japan. And he was not always an anti-immigrant hardliner. He had appeared on the jury at beauty pageant Miss Expat with migrant contestants, and had shared photographs on social media of his Czech girlfriend wearing body-concealing clothes to enter a mosque in London, describing the way she was welcomed as a “fine experience”. Mr Okamura shifted dramatically to the right in 2015, launching the SPD to take advantage, it has been claimed, of this trend towards populism. The political journey of 29-year-old Lukas took place roughly around the same time. The electrician, of Czech and German background, who does not want his surname published, was working in Dresden three years ago when hundreds of thousands of refugees were trekking into Europe, many to escape the Syrian war, with a large number heading into Germany. “My friends and I were just curious as first, but we began to see more and more of these people coming into the country, there seemed to be no end to this. “So myself and a few others began to take an interest; we went to discussion groups and then protest marches against this. We thought Europe was being changed in front of our eyes,” said Lukas. The anti-immigrant Pegida movement had taken to the streets in Dresden, and Lukas was soon marching with them. As his interest in far-right politics grew, he began to attend meetings of other nationalist organisations like Alternative for Germany (AfD), and the National Democratic Party (NPD), as well as another group he was not prepared to identify. All had pan-European and, to a lesser extent, trans-Atlantic connections, he pointed out. “Different people had some different views, but the general fear was that we as European Christians were being taken over. There was a lot of racism and the more you went into these groups, the more extreme it became,” Lukas, who is now living near Prague, reflected. “The hatred was general, against foreigners, against Muslims, and for those who were more into that kind of politics, against Jews.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note D’Analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS
    FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE KADYROV CONTRE ORLOV, LA DÉFENSE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EN PROCÈS Note d’analyse Stanislav Krasilnikov © ITAR-TASS / ITAR-TASS Février 2012 SOMMAIRE I. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 1. Présentation de la mission ................................................................................................. 3 2. Contexte du procès : la situation des défenseurs des droits de l’homme en Russie ...................................................................................... 3 3. L’impact du procès Ramzan Kadyrov contre Oleg Orlov sur l’ensemble de la société civile russe .......................................................................... 3 II. Le procès contre Oleg Orlov et Memorial : deux ans et demi de menace...................... 5 1. Le procès au civil ................................................................................................................ 5 2. Le procès au pénal ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Le procès pénal en appel ................................................................................................. 7 III. Un coup porté à la communauté des défenseurs des droits de l’homme ...................... 9 1. Une victoire en demi teinte pour Memorial .................................................................... 9 2. La mobilisation des défenseurs russes ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2020 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lack independence from the executive. The 2016 State Duma elections and the 2018 presidential election were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process, including the exclusion of meaningful opposition candidates. On July 1, a national vote held on constitutional amendments did not meet internationally recognized electoral standards. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Security Service, the Investigative Committee, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the National Guard are responsible for law enforcement. The Federal Security Service is responsible for state security, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism, as well as for fighting organized crime and corruption. The national police force, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for combating all crime. The National Guard assists the Federal Security Service’s Border Guard Service in securing borders, administers gun control, combats terrorism and organized crime, protects public order, and guards important state facilities. The National Guard also participates in armed defense of the country’s territory in coordination with Ministry of Defense forces. Except in rare cases, security forces generally report to civilian authorities. National-level civilian authorities have, at best, limited control over security forces in the Republic of Chechnya, which are accountable only to the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Members of the Russian security forces committed numerous human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012
    Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 Norwegian Helsinki Committee Established in 1977 The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) is a non-governmental organisation that works to promote respect for human rights, nationally and internationally. Its work is based on the conviction that documentation and active promotion of human rights by civil society is needed for states to secure human rights, at home and in other countries. NHC bases its work on international human rights instruments adopted by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. The main areas of focus for the NHC are the countries of Europe, North America and Central Asia. The NHC works irrespective of ideology or political system in these countries and maintains political neutrality. How wE work Human rigHts monitoring and reporting Through monitoring and reporting on problematic human rights situations in specific countries, the NHC sheds light on violations of human rights. The NHC places particular emphasis on civil and political rights, including the fundamental freedoms of expression, belief, association and assembly. On-site research and close co-operation with key civil society actors are our main working methods. The NHC has expertise in election observation and has sent numerous observer missions to elections over the last two decades. support of democratic processes By sharing knowledge and with financial assistance, the NHC supports local initiatives for the promotion of an independent civil society and public institutions as well as a free media. A civil society that functions well is a precondition for the development of democracy education and information Through education and information about democracy and human rights, international law and multicultural understanding, we work to increase the focus on human rights violations.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation
    MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Chechnya. What Happened After the Two Wars
    Corso di Laurea magistrale (ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004) in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Tesi di Laurea The new Chechnya. What happened after the two wars. Relatore Ch. Prof. Aldo Ferrari Correlatore Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Laureando Camilla Cairo Matricola 845532 Anno Accademico 2013/2014 Index Abstract p. 1 Introduction p. 4 Chapter I Historic background 1. Introduction to Chechnya: Religion, Society, Law p. 6 2. The Jihad and the Russian Conquest p. 10 3. Stalin’s Policy: the Deportation p. 14 4. The Early Nineties: the First Chechen War p. 16 5. From the Independence to the Second Chechen War p. 23 Chapter II What happened after the two wars? 1. The Chechenization Policy p. 29 a. Monetary Aid from the Federal Government to Chechnya p. 32 b. The Reconstruction of Grozny p. 36 c. The New, Traditional Islam p. 39 d. Cooptation and Terror p. 43 2. Limits of the Chechenization Process p. 47 Chapter III Terrorism Issue 1. Separatism and Fundamentalism p. 49 2. Terrorist Attacks p. 55 3. How to End Terrorism p. 65 Chapter IV Human Rights 1. Memorial and Human Rights Activists’ Situation of Hostility in Russia p. 71 2. The European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee against Torture p. 76 3. Human Rights Violations Connected to Islam and Other Examples p. 82 4. “Chechnya With No Traces of war” p. 87 Chapter V Ramzan Kadyrov and the Future of Chechnya 1. Ramzan Kadyrov and the Cult of Personality p. 90 2. Chechnya’s Future Within the North Caucasus Region p.
    [Show full text]
  • Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No
    Russia HUMAN Choking on Bureaucracy RIGHTS State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism WATCH February 2008 Volume 20, No. 1(D) Choking on Bureaucracy State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism I. Summary............................................................................................................... 1 Methodology.......................................................................................................5 II. Recommendations ...............................................................................................7 To the Russian Government.................................................................................7 With regard to the 2006 NGO law...................................................................7 To safeguard the work and role of NGOs in general ........................................7 To Russia’s International Partners, particularly the European Union and the Council of Europe............................................................................................... 8 To Donors .......................................................................................................... 9 III. Background.......................................................................................................10 Dismantling Checks and Balances.....................................................................10 Crackdown on Dissent and Political Opposition................................................. 12 Adoption of the 2006 NGO Law ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe?
    MEMORIAL Civic Human Rights Centre Assistance Migration and Law Network Committee Svetlana Gannushkina Why Are Residents of Russia Asking for Asylum in Europe? Moscow 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 I. Despotism of Ramzan Kadyrov’s regime 9 II. Fabrication of criminal charges and evidence 11 III. Women in Chechnya 20 IV. Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia 23 V. The need for resettlement of refugees 28 Appendicies 31 Appendix 1. The Story of Shamil Soltamuradov 31 Appendix 2. Persecution of the Mazurkevich Family in the Chechen Republic 33 Appendix 3. OA’s story 38 Appendix 4. Syrian refugees in Russia 41 Appendix 5. Protection of the Rights of Residents of North Caucasus Who Serve Sentences in the Russian Penal System (2015 – 2018) 51 Introduction INTRODUCTION This report is yet another attempt to draw the attention of the European Union migration authorities to the fact that mass deportations of Russian citizens applying for asylum in Europe violate the principles of international law. The mass deportations of Russians began in 2014, which coincided with the publication of our previous report “Chechens in Russia.” This report describes many of the difficulties faced by Chechens—the main population seeking refuge from Russia1. We will continue bringing the attention to issues faced by Chechens in this report, but also expand to other populations in Russia. It is important to note that the situation in Chechnya has not changed, and all of the issues described in our 2014 report continue to affect countless citizens. The population of Chechnya today lives in even greater fear of the Kadyrov regime’s unchecked power; corruption and extortion flourish, and a wide variety of human rights violations are committed through justification of observing (misinterpreted and abused) traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Svetlana Gannushkina Svetlana Gannushkina Is One of the Most Accomplished Leaders of the Human Rights Movement in Russia Today
    THE RIGHT LIVELIHOOD AWARD Svetlana Gannushkina Svetlana Gannushkina is one of the most accomplished leaders of the human rights movement in Russia today. Through the organisation that she founded and heads – the Civic Assistance Committee – she has provided free legal support, humanitarian aid and education to over 50,000 migrants, refugees and internally displaced persons since 1990. Her personal courage and successful advocacy in the Russian courts and the European Court of Human Rights has prevented the forced repatriation of migrants from Russia to Central Asian countries where they would have almost certainly been subject to imprisonment and torture. As a member of the Russian Presidential Human Rights Council from 2002-2012, Gannushkina successfully advocated for the law on refugees to be amended allowing for over two million persons to be granted Russian citizenship. Passionate about the transformative power of education, Gannushkina has brought repeated challenges to the Russian Supreme Court to grant all children in Russia, including migrants and refugees, the right to attend public schools. She has been outspoken in drawing public attention to human rights violations in the conflict regions, notably the Caucasus. From mathematician to human rights advocate Born in 1942 in Moscow, Gannushkina received a postgraduate education in Mathematics and worked from 1970-2000 first as a teacher, and then Associate Professor at the Department of Mathematics at the Russian State Humanitarian University (formerly Histories and Archives Institute). Even as an academic, Gannushkina - who says she approaches legal questions as she would mathematical challenges – took up cases of anti-Semitism and discrimination that she observed within her university.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ordinated By
    Co-ordinated by: Last updated: October 2020 Julia Zelvenska Head of Legal Support and Litigation European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Rue Royale 146, 1st floor 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 (2) 212 0814 Fax: +32 (2) 514 5922 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS A. Introduction Preface i European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) ii Introduction to ELENA iii B. Countries Austria 1 Belgium 8 Bosnia-Herzegovina 13 Bulgaria 15 Croatia 19 Cyprus 23 Czech Republic 26 Denmark 28 Estonia 32 Finland 34 France 37 Germany 47 Greece 57 Hungary 62 Iceland 65 Ireland 68 Italy 73 Latvia 87 Lithuania 89 Luxembourg 91 Malta 94 The Netherlands 97 Norway 102 Poland 108 Portugal 111 Romania 114 Russia 117 Serbia 121 Slovak Republic 125 Slovenia 128 Spain 133 Sweden 145 Switzerland 153 Turkey 156 Ukraine 159 United Kingdom 161 C. UNHCR Offices 165 D. Format of the country chapters In general the country chapters are structured as follows: I. ELENA NATIONAL COORDINATOR Name and address of the person who serves as the contact and coordination person for the ELENA network for the country in question. II. NATIONAL UMBRELLA ORGANISATIONS / REFUGEE COUNCILS National umbrella organisations of voluntary agencies, counselling offices and lawyers who exercise a coordinating function. III. ORGANISATIONS SUPPORTING ASYLUM SEEKERS Voluntary agencies, counselling centres and other humanitarian organisations dealing with counselling, housing, financial support, integration and other social problems of asylum seekers during the asylum procedure. IV. ORGANISATIONS PROVIDING ADVICE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS Non-Governmental Organisations and voluntary agencies providing legal advice and assistance to asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Department External Policies HUMAN RIGHTS in RUSSIA YEAR
    BRIEFING PAPER Policy Department External Policies HUMAN RIGHTS IN RUSSIA YEAR 2006 HUMAN RIGHTS November 2006 JANUARY 2004 EN This note was requested by the European Parliament's subcommittee on Human Rights. This paper is published in English and French Author: Svetlana Gannushkina Responsible Official: Andrea Subhan European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department BD4 06M071 rue Wiertz, 60 B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed on 27 November 2006. The study is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/expert/eStudies.do?languageEN Brussels, European Parliament, 18 November 2006. Any opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. EXPO/B/DROI/2006/39 November 2006 PE 348.611 EN Prologue A decade of cooperation bound our organization to Anna Politkovskaya. It began in August 1996 during the storming of Grozny, one of the more tragic episodes of the first Chechen campaign. When we were casting about to find any means possible to help people fleeing the war, I suddenly received a telephone call from Anna Politkovskaya. To publish a newspaper portrait for the first day of class of a Chechen boy who was going to a Moscow school with a bouquet of flowers – this was the romantic notion with which the famous journalist turned to me. I was forced to disappoint her. Instead of happy first graders, every day we were seeing children from Chechnya who would not be going to school on September 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination on Grounds of Race in the Russian Federation
    ‘Dokumenty!’ Discrimination on grounds of race in the Russian Federation AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL [back cover text] Discrimination on grounds of race is a reality for many members of ethnic or national minority groups in the Russian Federation. This report highlights particular patterns of racial discrimination and their effect on the everyday lives of the women, men and children in the Russian Federation who are denied their full human rights because of their colour, race, ethnicity, descent or national origin. Some groups are targeted disproportionately by police for checks of their identity documents, often leading to arbitrary detention or ill-treatment. Asylum-seekers and refugees suffer the additional difficulty that their documentation is not recognized by the police. In some regions whole communities are denied a range of economic, civil and political rights, including their right to citizenship. As in many other countries, law enforcement agencies in the Russian Federation often reflect rather than challenge discriminatory attitudes in society at large. Many racist attacks are not reported to the police because the victims fear further abuse. The result is that victims of racist crime rarely see justice done. In October 2002 Amnesty International launched a major worldwide campaign against human rights abuses in the Russian Federation, Justice for everybody. This report, which is published as part of that campaign, aims to mobilize people around the world to call on the government to confront and eradicate racism and ensure that the right to be free from racial discrimination becomes a reality for all within the Russian Federation. [end text] ‘Dokumenty! ’ Discrimination on grounds of race in the Russian Federation Cover: An armed policeman checking identity documents in Moscow, February 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center «Peace, Progress
    mission/activities page 01 The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center «Peace, Progress, Human Rights» The Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center is both a cultural institution and a public organization promoting the formation of civil society in Russia. It was established by the Public Commission for the Preservation of the Heritage of Academician Sakharov – Andrei Sakharov Foundation, chaired at the time by E. Bonner and, subsequently (since 2005), by S. Kovalev. The Museum and Public Center opened 21 May 1996, on the 75th anniversary of Sakharov's birth. Permanent exhibits, temporary exhibitions, the library, and museum collections are dedicated to three main issues: «Totalitarian past», «Conditions of freedom – issues that currently face Russia», «The life and activities of Andrei Sakharov». The Museum and Public Center often initiates and organ izes discussions on urgent societal and political issues and grants, free of charge, its facilities for sem inars, conferences and other public events to organizations whose goals do not contradict the mission of the Museum and Public Center. The Museum occupies a small mansion that was part of a 17th19th century estate last owned by the Usachev – Naydenov merchant family. The premises housing the Museum and Public Center have been granted by the Moscow City Government free of rent until 2021. Reconstruction of the building was accomplished by architect Grigory Sayevich, and the permanent collection was designed by architect Yevgeni Ass. Exposition equipment was developed, produced and mounted by Bioinjector IPK. The design of the Round Table Room incorporates works by artists Svetlana Assiryants and Daniel Mitlyansky and Maksim Mitlyansky.
    [Show full text]