DOCSLIB.ORG

Dedicatory Inscriptions in Greek Architecture of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HESPERIA 7I (2002) ARCH ITRAVAL Pages26I-293 ARROGANCE? DEDICATORYINSCRIPTIONS IN GREEKARCHITECTURE OF THE C LAS S I CA L P ER I OD ABST RACT Currentorthodoxyconsiders the proliferation of architravalinscriptionsnam- ing the donorsof architecturaldedications in the middleof the 4th centurya strikingdeparture from Greek practice of the High Classicalperiod, when modestself-effacement is supposedto havebeen the rule.I argue,however, that a comprehensiveview of the evidencesuggests substantial continuity ratherthan drastic change: that inscribing personal names on the architraves of Greekbuildings is not the productof foreigninfluence or royalarrogance, noran appropriationby individuals of rightspreviously exercised only by the state,but rather a naturaland predictable manifestation of widespreadGreek votiveand epigraphical habits of long standing. Dedicatoryinscriptions are attested on Greekarchitectural monuments fromthe 6th century B.C. onward.lThey record dedications made both by individualsand corporate groups (usually cities), and appear on a variety of structures,including temples, treasuries, altars, stoas, gateways, foun- tainhouses, and commemorative monuments. Extant examples for the 6th and5th centuries,however, are far fewer in number,and sometimes lessimpressive in appearanceaswell, than those from the 4th centuryand later.In fact,the second halfofthe 4th centurywitnesses a striking prolifer- ationof architecturaldedicatory inscriptions, most of themrecording gifts by individuals.2This proliferationhas oftenbeen considereda product of the greatchanges in Greeksocial and political life fromthe Classical 1. I am indebtedto morepeople on writtendrafts I amparticularly 2. No extantexamples of inscribed thanI canname for their comments gratefulto CarolLawton, Ronald architecturaldedications by individuals on andresponses to earlierversions Stroud,Hans Rupprecht Goette, areknown from the period460-360 of thispaper presented as talksat the MollyRichardson, and anonymous B.C., but morethan a dozendate be- Universityof California,Berkeley, referees.I wishalso to thankthe Arts tween360 and300. This dramatic the Universityof Virginia,McMaster ResearchBoard of McMasterUniver- increaseis not accompaniedby an University,and in Chicagoat the sityfor financialsupport, and the analogousupsurge in dedicatoryin- 99thAnnual Meeting of the Archaeo- DeutschesArchaologisches Institut scrlptlons. namlng . cltles . or corporate logicalInstitute of America.For advice, andEcole fran5caise d'Athenes for groups. information,references, and comments photographsand assistance. American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Hesperia ® www.jstor.org UMHOLTZ 262 GRETCHEN tothe Hellenisticperiod an indexof the declineof oldercivic values of thepolis and the riseof the ambitiousindividual, no longerrestrained by thereligious or socialscruples of the ClassicalAge.3 In thearchaeological record of theClassical period, architraval dedica- toryinscriptions by individualsseem to makea suddenand spectacular debut,not in the heartof the Greekworld, but rather in Caria,with the imposingdedications of Maussollosand his brother Idrieus in thesanctu- aryof Zeusat Labraunda(350s-340s B.C.).4 Theseinclude two imposing androns,one dedicated by Maussollos and one by Idrieus, a stoadedicated byMaussollos, and a peristyletemple, a gateway,a suite of oikoi,and anoth- erDoric building, all dedicatedby Idrieus.Many of thesemonuments carryprominent, elegantly carved dedicatory inscriptions in the centerof theirmarble architraves.5 In his publicationof theseinscriptions, Jonas Crampawrites: "It was contrary to theolder Greek spirit to recorda pub- licor private dedication of anedifice to (a)god(s) by an inscription on the wallsor on thearchitrave, though some few instances are known."6 In one formor anotherthis view is sharedby manyscholars.7 It continuesto be widelyaccepted in partbecause it fitsso wellwith much that we know,or thinkwe know,about Greek (and particularly Athenian) political and socialvalues of the 5th centuryand the hostilityof Atheniandemocracy towardanyone setting himself above his fellows.8 Accordingly, the phenom- enonof privatearchitectural dedication, and the prominentinscribing 3. Forexample, Lehmann (Samo- 4th-centuryexamples of architraval detailby Gunter(1985, pp. 118-119). thrace4.2, p.118) writes:"In the dec- inscriptions.Ongoing work by H. R. 7. See,for example, Hornblower theirdedi- 340-30 B.C.... the recordingof Goettesuggests that Athenian choregic 1982,p.274: "By inscribing of . ade . sucha personaldedication of a building monumentscould have taken the form catlonsln consplcuousposloons on t.ze . n a monumenta. lnscrlptlon on ltSen- ofbuildings with inscribedarchitraves architravesand facades of religious tablaturewas a noveltyattainable only asearly as the 360s B.C. (Goette1999). buildings,the Hekatomnidsbroke with bya memberof a royalfamily.... The 5. Forthese buildings and inscrip- a firmarchaic and classical Greek precedentfor dedications recorded on tions,see a fullerdiscussion below. tradition.The traditionwas that which thegreat altars of Greeksanctuaries 6. Crampa(Labraunda III.2, p. 5) enjoinedself-effacement by the wasoffered by city-states. and,in brieflyadumbrates a slow and sporadic dedicants,however generous, of such the fourthcentury, only royalty could developmentof the practice,which he buildings.... Hence,precedents for assumesuch prerogatives." Similarly, seesbecoming more common in the Hekatomnidpractice may be sought withparticular reference to temples, Hellenisticperiod and normal by frombeyond the Greekworld." Other Hornblower(1982, p.281) remarks: Romantimes. In lightof eastern examplesare listed in n. 3, above. "Greekpractice regarding temple precedents(Egyptian, Lydian, and 8. The institutionof ostracism,the dedicationsis sociallyilluminating. In Persian),however, he concludesthat cessationof the use of funeraryrelief few otherareas is it possibleto traceso it was"natural that Mausollus and sculpture,and the tendencyin por- clearlythe developmentfrom the clas- otherHecatomnids proudly recorded traitureto emphasizecommunally sicalcorporatism of old Greeceto the theirdedications of monumental valuedcivic virtues rather than indiv- assertivenessof the Hellenisticperiod." edificesby meansof inscriptions, idualfeatures all seemto supportthis Otherexamples include Morgan 1993, mostlyplaced on the architraves, generalview; see Scholl1996, pp.26- p. 19;and Labraunda III.2, p.5, both wherethey could be readin the most 29, n. 178.Yet, recent scholarship also .. quotedbelow, as well as Botermann . mpresslve* way. highlightsthe complexityof ongoing 1994,p. 182;Bean 1966, pp.58-59; The mostcomprehensive presenta- tensionsbetween individual and Picard1965, p.95. tionof the precedentsfor and signifi- communalprestige and the remarkable 4. The earliestof theseis the andron canceof the dedicatoryinscriptions rangeof responsesto thesetensions in dedicatedby Maussollos(Andron B) fromLabraunda is thatof Hornblower variousarenas of Athenianpublic life; on the terracebelow the Temple of (1982,pp. 286-288). The possible an excellentexample is PeterWilson's Zeus(discussed below). The monu- contributionsand significance of Near studyof the choregeia(Wilson 2000, mentsat Labraundamay soon have to Eastern(especially Persian) and esp.pp. 11-49, 109-197). surrendertheir status as the earliest Anatolianmodels are discussed in ARCHITRAVAL ARROGANCE? 263 of the nameof the donor,particularly in sucha highlyvisible location as thearchitrave, has been frequently viewed as an example of thecitizens of Greekpoleis adopting the practices of foreigners,tyrants, and kings.9 In the followingreconsideration of Greek architectural dedications, I arguethat the significanceand novelty of placinga dedicatoryinscription on a building'sarchitrave should not be overestimated,that foreign influ- enceis negligiblefor this Greek practice, and that fundamental political or religiouschanges need not be invokedto accountfor the proliferationof survivingexamples in mainlandGreece in the secondhalf of the4th cen- tury.The inscribedmonuments at Labraundahave deservedly played a prominentrole in scholarshipon thistopic (and will be discussedin more detailbelow), but they are not the sole,or eventhe primary,focus of this paper.The goal here is to assemblea morecomplete picture ofthe rangeof possibilities,precedents, and expectations that shaped Greek attitudes to- wardinscribing architectural dedications. In lightof theirremediable loss of one of the mostessential categories of evidencefor classicalpractice, . namey palntecWlnscnptlons on wooc Wor plaster, lt 1S verylmportant not to ignoreor marginalizethe potentiallyrelevant types of evidencethat do remain.Accordingly, the followingdiscussion takes a broadview, consid- eringepigraphical, aesthetic, and religious as well as sociopoliticalfactors, andtheir manifestations in othermedia as well as architecture.I shall ar- guethat architraval inscriptions should be viewednot as a departurefrom thetraditions of major(uninscribed) public architectural monuments, but ratheras a consistentmanifestation of long-standingepigraphical habits applicableto personalreligious dedications of alltypes. EXAMPLES FROM THE ARCHAIC AND EARLY CLASSICAL PERIODS The extantexamples of inscribedGreek architectural dedications from the Archaicand Early Classical periods are relatively few in number,but theyprovide important background for assessing later monuments. These
Recommended publications
  • The Conditions of Dramatic Production to the Death of Aeschylus Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1972; 13, 4; Proquest Pg

    The Conditions of Dramatic Production to the Death of Aeschylus Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1972; 13, 4; Proquest Pg

    The Conditions of Dramatic Production to the Death of Aeschylus Hammond, N G L Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1972; 13, 4; ProQuest pg. 387 The Conditions of Dramatic Production to the Death of Aeschylus N. G. L. Hammond TUDENTS of ancient history sometimes fall into the error of read­ Sing their history backwards. They assume that the features of a fully developed institution were already there in its earliest form. Something similar seems to have happened recently in the study of the early Attic theatre. Thus T. B. L. Webster introduces his excellent list of monuments illustrating tragedy and satyr-play with the following sentences: "Nothing, except the remains of the old Dionysos temple, helps us to envisage the earliest tragic background. The references to the plays of Aeschylus are to the lines of the Loeb edition. I am most grateful to G. S. Kirk, H. D. F. Kitto, D. W. Lucas, F. H. Sandbach, B. A. Sparkes and Homer Thompson for their criticisms, which have contributed greatly to the final form of this article. The students of the Classical Society at Bristol produce a Greek play each year, and on one occasion they combined with the boys of Bristol Grammar School and the Cathedral School to produce Aeschylus' Oresteia; they have made me think about the problems of staging. The following abbreviations are used: AAG: The Athenian Agora, a Guide to the Excavation and Museum! (Athens 1962). ARNon, Conventions: P. D. Arnott, Greek Scenic Conventions in the Fifth Century B.C. (Oxford 1962). BIEBER, History: M. Bieber, The History of the Greek and Roman Theatre2 (Princeton 1961).
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
  • The Five Orders of Architecture

    The Five Orders of Architecture

    BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna.
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
  • Agorapicbk-17.Pdf

    Agorapicbk-17.Pdf

    Excavations of the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 17 Prepared by Mabel L. Lang Dedicated to Eugene Vanderpool o American School of Classical Studies at Athens ISBN 87661-617-1 Produced by the Meriden Gravure Company Meriden, Connecticut COVER: Bone figure of Socrates TITLE PAGE: Hemlock SOCRATES IN THE AGORA AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1978 ‘Everything combines to make our knowledge of Socrates himself a subject of Socratic irony. The only thing we know definitely about him is that we know nothing.’ -L. Brunschvicg As FAR AS we know Socrates himselfwrote nothing, yet not only were his life and words given dramatic attention in his own time in the Clouds of Ar- istophanes, but they have also become the subject of many others’ writing in the centuries since his death. Fourth-century B.C. writers who had first-hand knowledge of him composed either dialogues in which he was the dominant figure (Plato and Aeschines) or memories of his teaching and activities (Xe- nophon). Later authors down even to the present day have written numerous biographies based on these early sources and considering this most protean of philosophers from every possible point of view except perhaps the topograph- ical one which is attempted here. Instead of putting Socrates in the context of 5th-century B.C. philosophy, politics, ethics or rhetoric, we shall look to find him in the material world and physical surroundings of his favorite stamping- grounds, the Athenian Agora. Just as ‘agora’ in its original sense meant ‘gathering place’ but came in time to mean ‘market place’, so the agora itself was originally a gathering place I.
  • Euphiletos' House: Lysias I Author(S): Gareth Morgan Source: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014), Vol

    Euphiletos' House: Lysias I Author(S): Gareth Morgan Source: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014), Vol

    Euphiletos' House: Lysias I Author(s): Gareth Morgan Source: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014), Vol. 112 (1982), pp. 115-123 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284074 Accessed: 13-09-2018 13:27 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284074?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014) This content downloaded from 69.120.182.218 on Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:27:29 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Transactions of the American Philological Association 112 (1982) 115-123 EUPHILETOS' HOUSE: LYSIAS I GARETH MORGAN University of Texas at Austin Lysias I, On the killing of Eratosthenes, is often cited in discussions of Greek domestic architecture for the details incidentally given about the house of the defendant, Euphiletos. This paper attempts to define rather more closely than before what we know about Euphiletos' house, and to relate it to archaeological evidence on Athenian private dwellings.' We may examine the relevant passages in the order they are presented by Euphiletos: (1) fHproV .ErV O VV, w aV8pES, .
  • Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon

    Parthenon 1 Parthenon Parthenon Παρθενών (Greek) The Parthenon Location within Greece Athens central General information Type Greek Temple Architectural style Classical Location Athens, Greece Coordinates 37°58′12.9″N 23°43′20.89″E Current tenants Museum [1] [2] Construction started 447 BC [1] [2] Completed 432 BC Height 13.72 m (45.0 ft) Technical details Size 69.5 by 30.9 m (228 by 101 ft) Other dimensions Cella: 29.8 by 19.2 m (98 by 63 ft) Design and construction Owner Greek government Architect Iktinos, Kallikrates Other designers Phidias (sculptor) The Parthenon (Ancient Greek: Παρθενών) is a temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron. Its construction began in 447 BC and was completed in 438 BC, although decorations of the Parthenon continued until 432 BC. It is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered to be the culmination of the development of the Doric order. Its decorative sculptures are considered some of the high points of Greek art. The Parthenon is regarded as an Parthenon 2 enduring symbol of Ancient Greece and of Athenian democracy and one of the world's greatest cultural monuments. The Greek Ministry of Culture is currently carrying out a program of selective restoration and reconstruction to ensure the stability of the partially ruined structure.[3] The Parthenon itself replaced an older temple of Athena, which historians call the Pre-Parthenon or Older Parthenon, that was destroyed in the Persian invasion of 480 BC. Like most Greek temples, the Parthenon was used as a treasury.
  • The Monopteros in the Athenian Agora

    The Monopteros in the Athenian Agora

    THE MONOPTEROS IN THE ATHENIAN AGORA (PLATE 88) O SCAR Broneerhas a monopterosat Ancient Isthmia. So do we at the Athenian Agora.' His is middle Roman in date with few architectural remains. So is ours. He, however, has coins which depict his building and he knows, from Pau- sanias, that it was built for the hero Palaimon.2 We, unfortunately, have no such coins and are not even certain of the function of our building. We must be content merely to label it a monopteros, a term defined by Vitruvius in The Ten Books on Architecture, IV, 8, 1: Fiunt autem aedes rotundae, e quibus caliaemonopteroe sine cella columnatae constituuntur.,aliae peripteroe dicuntur. The round building at the Athenian Agora was unearthed during excavations in 1936 to the west of the northern end of the Stoa of Attalos (Fig. 1). Further excavations were carried on in the campaigns of 1951-1954. The structure has been dated to the Antonine period, mid-second century after Christ,' and was apparently built some twenty years later than the large Hadrianic Basilica which was recently found to its north.4 The lifespan of the building was comparatively short in that it was demolished either during or soon after the Herulian invasion of A.D. 267.5 1 I want to thank Professor Homer A. Thompson for his interest, suggestions and generous help in doing this study and for his permission to publish the material from the Athenian Agora which is used in this article. Anastasia N. Dinsmoor helped greatly in correcting the manuscript and in the library work.
  • The Role of the Plague in the "Iliad" Author(S): Daniel R

    The Role of the Plague in the "Iliad" Author(S): Daniel R

    The Role of the Plague in the "Iliad" Author(s): Daniel R. Blickman Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Apr., 1987), pp. 1-10 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25010855 . Accessed: 05/10/2014 18:07 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 76.72.144.32 on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:07:50 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions DANIEL R. BLICKMAN The Role of the Plague in the Iliad IN HIS FAMOUSstudy of image and symbol in the Aeneid, Viktor P6schl remarks thatHomer does not use the plague motif to set themood of the Iliad in the same way that Virgil does through the opening storm at sea.1Homeric scholars have concurred insofar as the episode of the plague is discussed mainly as the occasion of Agamemnon and Achilles' quarrel.2Yet this drama should not blind us to the role of the plague in setting the tone for what follows, nor, more importantly, in providing an ethical pattern which lies near the heart of the story.
  • THE SANCTUARY at EPIDAUROS and CULT-BASED NETWORKING in the GREEK WORLD of the FOURTH CENTURY B.C. a Thesis Presented in Partial

    THE SANCTUARY at EPIDAUROS and CULT-BASED NETWORKING in the GREEK WORLD of the FOURTH CENTURY B.C. a Thesis Presented in Partial

    THE SANCTUARY AT EPIDAUROS AND CULT-BASED NETWORKING IN THE GREEK WORLD OF THE FOURTH CENTURY B.C. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Pamela Makara, B.A. The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Timothy Gregory Dr. Jack Ba I cer Dr. Sa u I Corne I I VITA March 13, 1931 Born - Lansing, Michigan 1952 ..... B.A. in Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 1952-1956, 1966-Present Teacher, Detroit, Michigan; Rochester, New York; Bowling Green, Ohio 1966-Present ............. University work in Education, Art History, and Ancient Greek and Roman History FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in Ancient Civi I izations: Dr. Timothy Gregory and Dr. Jack Balcer i i TABLE OF CONTENTS VITA i i LIST OF TABLES iv CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 I I. ANCIENT EPIDAUROS AND THE CULT OF ASKLEPIOS 3 I II. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI DECREES 9 IV. EPIDAURIAN THEOROI 21 v. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS 23 VI. AN ARGIVE THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 37 VII. A DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 42 VIII. SUMMARY 47 END NOTES 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY 55 APPENDICES A. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS AND TRANSLATIONS 58 B. ARGIVE THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT I ON 68 C. DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 69 D. THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT IONS PARALLELS 86 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Thearodoko i I nscr i pt ions Para I I e Is •••••••••••• 86 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Any evidence of I inkage in the ancient world is valuable because it clarifies the relationships between the various peoples of antiquity and the dealings they had with one another.
  • Sleeping Furies: Allegory, Narration and the Impact of Texts in Apulian Vase-Painting*

    Sleeping Furies: Allegory, Narration and the Impact of Texts in Apulian Vase-Painting*

    Sleeping Furies: Allegory, Narration and the Impact of Texts in Apulian Vase-Painting* Luca Giuliani Picture-vases in a funerary context In this paper I shall discuss a few basic peculiarities of Apulian vase paint­ ing. I will proceed in two steps. First I shall concentrate on the difference between what I call narrative versus allegorical meaning; as meaning is al­ ways closely connected with function, I will start from the few things we know about the way Apulian vases were actually used. In the second part of the paper I shall concentrate on the iconography of (just) one mythological episode: we shall look at Orestes in Delphi, surrounded by the sleeping Fu­ ries, and we shall have to ask what can actually have been the reason for the painters to show Furies sound asleep. But let us begin at the beginning. The production of red-figure vases on the Gulf of Tarentum starts around the middle of the fifth century: the tech­ nique is Attic, Attic is the shape of the vases, Attic their iconography; the first potters and painters must have been of Attic origin, having had their training in the Athenian Kerameikos. For about one generation the connec­ tion between Apulian and Attic vase-production remains rather close: but around 400 BC the immigration of Attic vase painters as well as the import of Attic vases comes to a sudden end: from this time at the latest vase-production in Apulia develops to become a phenomenon of its own. * Many thanks to David Wasserstein for suggesting the publication o f my paper in this journal.