Developing Strategies for Determining Land Use Adjacent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Developing Strategies for Determining Land Use Adjacent DEVELOPING STRATEGIES FOR DETERMINING LAND USE ADJACENT TO TRANSIT STATIONS IN METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BY DESIREE YVONNE WHITE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ATLANTA, GEORGIA MAY 1979 rv. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 Goals and Objectives 2 Setting 3 Methodology 3 II. OVERVIEW OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS 5 III. MASS TRANSIT PLANNING IN DADE COUNTY 10 IV. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSES OF SEVEN STATION AREAS . 15 Brownsville Station 15 Civic Center Station 18 Coconut Grove Station 21 Dadeland North Station 23 South Miami Station 25 Culmer Station 27 Dadeland South Station 30 V. RECOMMENDATIONS 33 BIBLIOGRAPHY 36 ii ABSTRACT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION WHITE, DESIREE YVONNE B.S., Tennessee University, 1977 Developing Strategies for Determining Land Use Adjacent to Transit Stations in Metropolitan Dade County Advisor: Dr. Catherine Ross Thesis dated March 17, 1979 This paper addresses the need for land use management in the Office of Transportation Administration (OTA). There is a need for land use management because control of land development around transit stations does not presently exist in Dade County. The study suggests that land uses and transportation systems have a high degree of interdependency, in that changes in one often have a direct effect on the other. Im provements in transportation systems can serve as an impetus for land development. However, the management of such devel opment is typically not addressed. The study suggests there is a need for land use man agement in OTA. Therefore, recommendations are made that will assist Dade County in developing station area plans that are consistent with the existing environment. I. INTRODUCTION The successful development of a community as a desir able place to live, work, and play, to a large extent, de pends upon how effectively and efficiently its transportation system provides for the movement of people. Transportation facilities play three major roles in urban development. First, the transportation system is a mover of people and goods. Secondly, it is a physical tool for directing and shaping urban development. Thirdly, when combined with other tools, transportation facilities can be effectively used in meeting social, economic, and environ mental needs and in creating a major influence on metropoli tan life styles. Ideally, the planning for an effective and efficient transportation system should take place within the context of a well defined plan. Such a plan should express the com munity's sense of priorities as well as immediate and long- range goals and objectives. Recognizing that an improved transportation system would be needed to accommodate its rapidly growing population, Dade County sponsored a series of technical studies called the Miami Urban Area Transportation Studies (MUATS). MUATS was organized in 1963 to provide Dade County 1 2 with a continuous and comprehensive transportation planning process. In 1969, MUATS completed its initial comprehensive planning effort and proposed the development of a balanced transportation network to meet transportation needs for 1985. The citizens of Dade County have made several decisions during recent years which, to a significant degree, will con trol the direction and priorities of the transportation sys tem. The first decision led to deletion of six of the pro posed expressways. The second decision led to a series of transit technical studies in 1969. On the basis of these studies, the voters of Dade County approved a bond issue in 1972 to provide the local share for building a unified transportation system, including a rapid transit system and an improved bus system. In this paper, the writer will address the need for land use management in the Office of Transportation Adminis tration (OTA) where the writer served as an intern. The purpose of this paper is to develop strategies for station area land use management. These plans will be the basis on which policies will be developed to guide land use management around transit stations. The Goals and Objectives of This Research Are; 1. To acquaint the reader with the comprehensive transporta tion planning process on Metropolitan Dade County. 2. To identify those factors that affect the development plans for proposed station areas. 3. To develop recommendations for determining land use ad jacent to transit stations in Metropolitan Dade County. Setting The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was es tablished on March 23, 1977. It has the power, authority, and responsibility to plan for a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning and programming process in cooperation with the State. The Governor of Florida appointed members of the Dade County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as voting members of the MPO. The MPO has the exclusive responsibility for making final decisions on all policy matters relating to transportation plans and programs. It also has the authority to contract with local agencies utilizing their staff re sources. One such agency is the Transportation Planning Council (TPC). TPC members are selected from the department heads of County departments participating in the transportation plan ning process. The TPC is a mission-oriented structure, de signed to develop and maintain a transportation system con sistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). The TPC may be thought of as the production arm of the MPO. Methodology In order to gather information relevant to this study, 4 the researcher employed both primary and secondary data col lection techniques. Interviews were used as a primary data collection technique. Transportation planners from the Metropolitan Atlanta Regional Transit Authority (MARTA) and the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) were interviewed. Data collected during the internship was also used. This information includes interviews as well as written re ports . Secondary data was gathered from numerous sources. A variety of books, magazine articles, and documents were used for the purpose of providing the researcher with infor mation on the planning process, mass transit planning, and land use development in Metropolitan Dade County. Due to time constraints, the writer examined seven of the twenty transit station areas. These stations were selected because they represent the greatest diversity of land use. The study proceeded by examining land use policy. After analyzing both existing and proposed land use plans criteria were established to guide land use management of areas adjacent to transit stations. II. OVERVIEW OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS Transportation is a powerful force, a basic kind of organizing tool underlying all national activity. Much of the social, political, and economic well-being of the nation is dependent on the transportation system. Efficient transportation has become one of the major challenges confronting the modern urban region. The vitality of an area relates directly to the quality of its transporta tion services.1 Modern transportation planning began in 1900 with the Burnham Plan for Chicago; this plan was essentially a city beautiful plan which incorporated the transportation needs of Chicago.2 In 1920, comprehensive transportation planning was practiced by the Regional Plan Association of New York City. Planning as a national activity did not begin until the 1930s. It consisted of two kinds: (1) comprehensive planning and (2) highway planning. At that time planning was primarily under taken with regard to railroad problems, since railroads dominated the national transportation scene. !m. J. Bruton, Introduction to Transportation Planning, (New York: Anchor Press & William Brendon, 1970), p. 13. 2Milton Pikarsky and Daphne Christensen, Urban Transpor tation Policy and Management, (Chicago: D. C. Heath and Com pany, 1976), p. 59. 6 Urban transportation planning began on the local level with the Chicago Area Transportation Study (CATS) and Penn Jersey. CATS was formed to analyze existing travel behavior, to forecast future requirements of the metropolitan region and to recommend long-range plans for needed highways and mass transportation facilities.3 Increased federal involvement in urban transportation planning began with the Housing Act of 1961, which provided funds for integrating transportation with community planning. The following year the Federal Highway Act of 1962 set a deadline of July 1, 1965, by which time all metropolitan areas with a population of 50,000 or more were required to plan a comprehensive transportation plan embracing all modes of travel and taking land use plans into consideration.4 As a result of the above policy, a number of states created ad hoc organizations to develop metropolitan transpor tation plans. New York State, with seven metropolitan areas, set up the Upstate New York Transportation Studies in 1962. The Tri-State Transportation Committee was formed to prepare plans for the six major upstate areas in cooperation with New Jersey and Connecticut. At the same time transportation plan ning was developing as a discipline. The federal government began favoring regions for grants that had planning councils such as the Council of Governments (COG) and the Regional 3Ibid., pp. 60-62. 4Roger L. Creighton, Urban Transportation Planning, (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1972), p. 131. 7 Planning Commission (RPC).5 By 1970 there were 476 such
Recommended publications
  • TCRP Report 31: Funding Strategies for Public Transportation
    Station Concessions Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City, New York This page left intentionally blank. Station Concessions Metropolitan Transportation Authority Background Agency Profile Transit systems have many assets which provide attractive business opportunities to the private sector. One of these assets, real estate in high-traffic stations, can provide retailers with a steady stream of potential customers. Both large and small systems can benefit from the productive use of excess space in transit stations. Large transit systems serve thousands of people 169 daily and many small systems have central transfer points through which large numbers of people pass. In high-traffic stations transit agencies can raise funds and provide their riders with conveniences such as food, newspapers, flowers, or dry cleaning through concessions. Case Background For over a century, the transit system in New York City has recognized the value of the premium real estate it Transportation Authority [MTA]), maintained this holds. One of the founders of the system, August Belmont, program to generate revenue from otherwise unused saw concessions as a way to make additional money. When space. This space is licensed to concessionaires — the transit system was purchased by the public sector, the individuals, partnerships, or corporations — who pay city, and since 1953, the New York City Transit Authority rent to occupy space on MTA property. (now part of the Metropolitan Transit Cooperative Research Program While concessions can exist at any high-density safer in subway stations than on the streets of New York station, in New York, concessions are concentrated in City. about one-fourth of the 470 stations of the New York subway system.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Miami-Dade & Broward Counties
    MIAMI-DADE & BROWARD COUNTIES RESIDENTIAL MARKETS Make A Better Move With The Market In Sight. DOWNLOAD CONFERENCE PRESENTATION DOWNLOAD MIAMI-DADE CHARTS & DATA DOWNLOAD BROWARD CHARTS & DATA President & CEO, EWM Realty International | Ron Shuffield Senior Vice President & General Sales Manager, EWM Realty International | Sherrie Porter Senior Vice President, Business Development, EWM Realty International | Patrick O’Connell EDITORIAL Kreps DeMaria PR & Marketing | Israel Kreps Kreps DeMaria PR & Marketing | Caroline Underwood RESEARCH Chief Financial Officer, EWM Realty International | Hena M. Aguirre, CPA Financial Analyst, EWM Realty International | Sanja Shank, MBA TrendGraphix, Inc. DESIGN Director of Marketing, EWM Realty International | Lee S. Casey, MBA SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS Director, Transportation & Public Works, Miami-Dade County | Alice N. Bravo, P.E. Founder & Principal, Washington Economics Group | Dr. J. Antonio Villamil SOUTH FLORIDA SETTING THE GLOBAL PACE EWM Realty International’s 2017 South Florida Real Another key factor to consider is Florida’s booming Estate Market Outlook provides a snapshot of 2016 population growth, which pushed Florida to be results and trends expected to influence the 2017 recognized as the third largest state in the country in residential real estate markets in Miami-Dade and 2014, bypassing New York. Our State is growing by just Broward counties. over 1,000 “net” new residents per day! The latest U.S. Census Bureau data shows that the tri-county area of The proprietary platform from which this information is Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach is now the eighth- gleaned, coupled with insights provided by our internal most populated metropolitan statistical area (MSA) in the research team, affords our readers a one-of-a-kind nation, with the three counties comprising just over six perspective on South Florida’s dynamic residential real million permanent residents, or 30% of the State’s total estate market.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Area Route
    Better Bus Network (West) The route maps include the following information: - Key Destinations: list of places/connections served by the respective transit route - Frequency: buses per hour, listed by peak and off peak and on weekdays and weekend days - Span of Service: time period of operation on weekdays and weekend days - Notes: relationship of proposed Better Bus routes to existing routes Better Bus Route 8 – Brickell-FIU-SW 152 Ave/26 St via SW 8 St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus Metrobus terminal, Brickell Metrorail/ Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 30 30 Sat 30 Sun Off Peak Frequency 30 5:00 AM to Span of 5:00 AM to 12:00 AM Sat Service 12:00 AM 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM Sun Note: Similar route 24/51 routing on west end. Increased frequency all day to FIU. Branch to Coral Way eliminated. Proposed peak only service to provide 15 min frequency from 82 Ave to Brickell. Better Bus Route Peak 8 – Brickell- Westchester via SW 8 St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus Metrobus terminal, Brickell Metrorail/ Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 30 No service Off Peak Frequency No service 6:00 AM to Span of 9:00 AM; No service Service 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM Note: Proposed peak only service to provide 15 min frequency from 82 Ave to Brickell. Better Bus Route 11 – FIU-Downtown via Flagler St Key Destinations: FIU Maidique Campus, Government Center Metrorail / Metromover station. Weekdays Weekends Peak Frequency 10 10 Sat 15 Sun Off Peak Frequency 10 Span of 24 hours 24 hours Service Note: More frequent service all day to FIU from 20/40 min to 10 min.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move... Miami-Dade County's Pocket
    Guide Cover 2013_English_Final.pdf 1 10/3/2013 11:24:14 AM 111 NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 tel: (305) 375-4507 fax: (305) 347-4950 www.miamidade.gov/mpo C M On the Y CM MY Move... CY CMY K Miami-Dade County’s Pocket Guide to Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 4th Edition Table of Contents Highway Information Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) p. 1 FDOT’s Turnpike Enterprise p. 2 Florida Highway Patrol p. 2 95 Express Lanes p. 3 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) p. 4 SunPass® p. 5 511-SmarTraveler p. 5 Road Rangers p. 5 SunGuide® Transportation Management Center p. 6 Miami-Dade Public Works and Waste p. 7 Management Department Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) p. 8 Driving and Traffic Regulations p. 8 Three Steps for New Florida Residents p. 9 Drivers License: Know Before You Go p. 9 Vehicle Registration p. 10 Locations and Hours of Local DMV Offices p. 10-11 Transit Information Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) p. 12 Metrobus, Metrorail, Metromover p. 12 Fares p. 13 EASY Card p. 13 Discount EASY Cards p. 14-15 Obtaining EASY Card or EASY Ticket p. 15 Transfers p. 16-17 Park and Ride Lots p. 17-18 Limited Stop Route/Express Buses p. 18-19 Special Transportation Services (STS) p. 20 Special Event Shuttles p. 21 Tax-Free Transit Benefits p. 21 I Transit Information (Continued) South Florida Regional Transportation Authority p. 22 (SFRTA) / TriRail Amtrak p. 23 Greyhound p. 23 Fare & Schedule Information p. 24 Local Stations p.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Hyperdensity in Miami: Year 2100 Kenner N
    Policy Memorandum Tropical Dense[city]:Transit-Oriented Hyperdensity in Miami: Year 2100 Kenner N. Carmody, M.Des Energy & Environments 2019 Problem: This research aims to visualize and better understand future required housing stock necessary to accommodate displaced populations in Miami’s Allapattah neighborhood affected by sea level rise and resultant tidal inundation by the year 2100 (NOAA Office for Coastal Management). Property data, local geography and NOAA sea-level rise projections within this time-scale are used in order to propose greater density in Miami due to lost surface area. This study evaluates the existing spatial capacity and density distribution under current zoning policy, Miami 21. This study reveals that the current zoning code, overlay districts, and Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ) within the population catchment area of Allapattah are maladaptive. - The spatial analysis in this research assumes a residential occupancy of 1 person per 450 square feet (41.8m2), and floor to floor heights of 14’-0” (4.2m). - The criteria for this displacement assumes intracity relocation within Miami’s urban core, and excludes populations affected outside of the target study area of Allapattah. - This model assumes relocation within a population catchment area in Allapattah at elevations of 6’-0” above sea level and assumes density increases along Miami’s legacy Metrorail system. - This study excludes future population growth from the required future housing scenario. Figures Housing: - Total Population in Allapattah: 58,978 (2010 Census Data); 62,929 (2017 Estimate) - Total Housing Units: 22,255 - Unit Mix: Studio: 3% 1-Bedroom: 8%; 2-Bedroom: 35%; 3-Bedroom: 20%; 4-Bedroom: 17%; 5-Bedroom: 7%; 6-Bedroom: 4%; > 6% - The majority of housing stock in Allapattah predates 1975 and is poorly suited to its geography and climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Locator Keys Identify Sites on This Map, 23 Heading NW from the Confluence of the P Miami River and Biscayne Bay
    A NOTE USING THIS GUIDE… Locator keys identify sites on this map, 23 heading NW from the confluence of the P Miami River and Biscayne Bay. Locator keys are in one of the following four 21 categories: HISTORIC SITES: Blue numbers 22 RIVER BRIDGES: Blue letters POINTS OF INTEREST: Green numbers AREA BUSINESSES: Red numbers MIAMI RIVER BRIDGE Bascule (B); Fixed (F) 3 Brickell Bridge (B) . A 19 27 Metro Mover Bridge (F) . B South Miami Avenue (B) . C 2021 O Metrorail (F) . .D S .W . 2nd Avenue (B) . E Interstate I-95 (3F) . F 14 N S .W . First Street (B) . G West Flagler Street (B) . .H 15 N .W . 5th Street (B) . I 24 N .W . 12th Avenue (B) . J 18 19 S .R . 836/Dolphin Expwy . (F) . K 16 14 N .W . 17th Avenue (B) . L M 12 N .W . 22nd Avenue (B) . M 13 N .W . 27th Avenue (B) . N 16 N .W . South River Dr . (B) . O Railroad (B) . P 12 13 L 32 30 POINTS OF INTEREST 4 Beginning of Miami River Greenway . 1 K 10 34 27 James L . Knight Convention Center . 2 J Metro-Mover “Fifth Street” Station .3 26 34 11 Metro-Mover “Riverwalk” Station . 4 MIAMI RIVER BUSINESSES 22 12 Metro-Rail “Brickell” Station . 5 1 5TH STREET MARINA 11 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 21 MARITIME AGENCY INC 32 RIVER LANDING Miami-Dade Cultural Center . 6 Marina To grow, strengthen & promote Downtown Miami International Shipping Terminal Retail, Restaurants, Residential 341 NW South River Dr. Miami 33128 (305) 579-6675 3630 NW North River Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Ten Year Implementa Tion Plan
    TEN YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TEN YEAR IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER 6 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANNUAL UPDATE 6 TEN YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (FY 2019 - FY 2028) The Ten Year FY2018-FY2027 MDT10Ahead Implementation Plan Tables present the transit project items’ cost and status as of December 2017. Tables 6-1 and 6-2 list DTPW’s Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit Plan (SMART) and Bus Express Rapid Transit (BERT) projects. Combined, these two tables present the County’s vision for six (6) rapid transit and nine (9) express bus corridors that will serve as the framework for DTPW’s transit network. Tables 6-3 through 6-5 list the agency’s Funded, Partially Funded, and Unfunded Projects. Information highlighting changes in scope, timing, budget or completion versus the 2017 Annual Update is also provided in each table. DTPW’s strategy for this implementation plan is to improve existing Metrobus routes, implement new Metrobus routes, advance premium transit corridors identified throughout Miami-Dade County and discontinue unproductive routes. DTPW will continue to focus on improving on- time performance, providing a clean and attractive system for passenger use, improve customer convenience through the latest available technology, and assess system expansion opportunities. 6.1 SMART Plan The SMART Plan is a bold infrastructure investment program that will significantly improve transportation mobility and will provide a world-class system that will support economic growth and competitiveness in the global arena. Miami is a global hub representing not only the Gateway of the Americas, but also the nation’s southeast capital for international freight and cargo, as well as the number one passenger cruise port in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-City-District-Regulations.Pdf
    Approved Mayor Agenda Item No. Veto __________ Override __________ ORDINANCE NO. ______________ ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND OTHER LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE MODEL CITY URBAN CENTER DISTRICT; CREATING SECTIONS 33-284.99.40 THROUGH 33-284.99.46 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (CODE); AMENDING SECTION 33C-7 OF THE CODE; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 33-284.99.40 of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby created as follows: ARTICLE XXXIII (R) MODEL CITY URBAN CENTER DISTRICT (MCUCD) Sec. 33-284.99.40. Purpose, intent and applicability. A. The regulations contained in this chapter and Chapter 18A, Landscape Code, Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, shall apply to this article, except as otherwise added to or modified herein. B. The Illustrative Master Plan (Figure 1) illustrates the citizens’ vision and may be used to interpret this article. Where the Illustrative Master Plan conflicts with the provisions of this article, the provisions of this article shall govern. C. Figure 1 also shows the boundaries of the Model City Urban Center District (MCUCD), as well as the boundaries of the Designated Urban Center. The MCUCD’s Designated Urban Center shall consist of the areas designated as being the Core and Center Sub-districts on the Sub-districts Plan in Sec. 33- 284-99.43 of this code. As provided in Standard Urban Center District Regulations, the Workforce Housing requirement shall Agenda Item No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6
    MTI The InfluenceThe of ServiceTransitPlanning Failure DecisionsSuccess or on Rail Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California The Influence of Service Planning Department of Transportation Decisions on Rail Transit Success or Failure MTI ReportMTI 08-04 MTI Report 08-04 June 2009 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Chair House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee Hans Rat and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des California Institute for community.
    [Show full text]
  • Grounds Maintenance for Metrorail, Metromover, Metrobus, Busway, Facilities, Stations and Right of Way
    Attachment 8F14 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FOR METRORAIL, METROMOVER, METROBUS, BUSWAY, FACILITIES, STATIONS AND RIGHT OF WAY DATE LOCATION 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Palmetto Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Okeechobee Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Hialeah Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Northside Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dr. M L King Jr Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Brownsville Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Earlington Heights Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Allapattah Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Santa Clara Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Civic Center Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Culmer Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Overtown Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Brickell Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Vizcaya Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Coconut Grove Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Douglas Road Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Douglass Road Metrorail Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the University Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the South Miami Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dadeland North Heights Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dadeland South Heights Station Knight Center Metromover Station Inner Loop at Electrical Room east of 88 SE 4 St entrance 04/27/2016 to Night Center main tower parking garage Grounds Maintenance to 10235 SW 186 St (Lot Size 87,692 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Meeting
    Florida Housing Finance Corporation 7/20/12 Planning Committee 1. Review of development costs per unit 2. Funding of TODs 3. Demonstration of highest Florida job creation 4. Funding of & Preference for RA Levels 1-3 (Preservation) 5. Universal Design & Visitability Features 6. Resident Programs FHFC-Financed Developments Located Near MetroRail Stations in Miami-Dade County Station Name/Development Name Year Funded Units 2011 UAC Deals ranked for funding are highlighted Palmetto Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Okeechobee Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Hileah Station (0 applied) No existing developments within 0.5 miles Tri-Rail/MetroRail Station (0 applied) *Station Area overlaps with Northside No existing developments within 0.5 miles Northside Station (2 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Trirail/MetroRail No existing developments within 0.5 miles Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Station (0 applied) *Station area overlaps with Brownsville No existing developments within 0.5 miles Brownsville Rail Station (2 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Dr. MLK Jr. Everett Steward Sr. Village (E) 2007 96 Brownsville Transit Village II (E) 2008 100 Brownsville Transit Village III (E) 2010 103 Brownsville Transit Village IV (F) 2010 102 Mildred and Claude Pepper Towers (E-pres) 2005 150 Ward Tower Assisted Living Facility (E-ALF) 2005 100 Earlington Heights Station (7 applied; 0 awarded) *Station area overlaps with Allapattah Esmeralda Bay (E) 2010 96 Friendship Tower
    [Show full text]