DOCSLIB.ORG

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………………… P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………………… P Copyright by Courtney Lanston Dillard 2002 The Dissertation Committee for Courtney Lanston Dillard Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Radical Flank Effects: Investigations into the Influence of Emerging Radical Voices on the Rhetoric of Long-standing Moderate Organizations in Two Social Movements Committee: ___________________________ Dana Cloud, Supervisor ___________________________ Rick Cherwitz ___________________________ Roderick Hart ___________________________ Laurie Lewis __________________________ Karin Wilkins The Rhetorical Dimensions of Radical Flank Effects: Investigations into the Influence of Emerging Radical Voices on the Rhetoric of Long-standing Moderate Organizations in Two Social Movements by Courtney Lanston Dillard, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2002 The Rhetorical Dimensions of Radical Flank Effects: Investigations into the Influence of Emerging Radical Voices on the Rhetoric of Long-standing Moderate Organizations in Two Social Movements Publication No. ______ Courtney Lanston Dillard, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2002 Supervisor: Dana Cloud Guided by an interest in the origins of social change, this dissertation investigates how long-standing social movement organizations adopt and promote more progressive ideologies over time. While some scholars have argued that well- established social movement organizations tend to occupy positions more in line with the status quo as they age, there are provocative cases in the field that challenge this perspective. In this dissertation, I examine two social movement organizations, The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the Sierra Club, both of which iv continue to introduce new arguments and new messages into the public sphere and therefore encourage the public to embrace a larger degree of social change. In attempting to explain how these organizations have developed their discourse in the last thirty years, I focus on the impact of key emerging radical groups within the larger movement. I ask: Does the rhetoric introduced into the animal protection and environmental advocacy movements by more radical groups affect the rhetoric of more moderate organizations in those same movements? I endeavor to answer this question by tracking and analyzing the rhetoric produced by HSUS and the Sierra Club from 1970 to 2000. In conducting my investigations, I explore whether attempts on the part of radicals to expand the realm of identification (Burke, 1950) by challenging taken for granted notions concerning the value of animals/the earth and offering counter-arguments can be found in the discourse of later campaign materials produced by the moderates. In order to do this, I track shifts in the arguments presented by the moderate organizations both prior to and following the emergence of the more radical groups - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and EarthFirst!. Specifically, I explore whether following the introduction of a more radical ideology into the movement, moderates begin to challenge accepted norms concerning human relations with animals/the earth, ultimately setting the stage for a reinterpretation of that relation and a broadening of the existing sphere of identification. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………… iv LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………. xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………………… p. 1 Research Questions ……………………………………… p. 10 Rationale ………………………………………………… p. 11 Limitations of the Study – Scope and Conclusions …….. p. 15 Chapter Outline ……………………………………… … p. 16 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………. p. 19 Sociology: Theoretical Paradigms and Social Movements …… p. 20 Inter-organizational Relations ………………………. p. 27 Radical Flank Effects ……………………………….. p. 27 Framing ……………………………………………. p. 29 Communication Studies: Theoretical Paradigms and Social Movements ……………………………………….. p. 32 Rhetorical Dimensions of Radicals and Moderates … p. 36 vi Hegemony and Counter-hegemony ………………… p. 39 Research on the Environmental Advocacy & Animal Protection Movements …………………………… p. 43 CHAPTER THREE: CONTEXT & METHODOLOGY ………… p. 52 Case One: The Animal Protection Movement ……………… p. 53 Short History of the Animal Protection Movement p. 53 Ideological Underpinnings – Animal Welfare …… p. 55 Humane Society of the United States …………… p. 57 Ideological Underpinnings –Animal Rights ……. p. 55 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals – PETA …. p. 61 Case Two: The Environmental Advocacy Movement …………. p. 64 Short History of the Environmental Advocacy Movement p. 64 Ideological Underpinnings - Conservation and Preservation …………………………. p. 67 Sierra Club …………………………………………… p. 68 Ideological Underpinnings of Radical/Deep Ecology … p. 70 EarthFirst! …………………………………………….. p. 73 The Lens of Rhetorical Criticism ………………………………. p. 75 Identification …………………………………………. p. 77 Problematizing use value: blocking enthymemes …….. p. 81 vii Method ………………………………………………………. p. 84 Rhetorical Criticism……………………………… p. 84 Empirical Analysis…………………………. ……. p. 86 Data Collection …………………………………………….. p. 87 Archival Material ………………………………… p. 87 Interviews ……………………………………………... p. 89 CHAPTER 4: NEW CHALLENGES TO OUR USE OF ANIMALS – ARGUMENTS BEYOND CRUELTY ……………………………… p. 91 The Fur Animal Campaign: From Cruel Traps to Shameful Display ………………………………………… p. 92 HSUS 1970 - 1980 ………………………………….. p. 98 PETA 1980 - 1990 ………………………………….. p. 101 HSUS 1980 - 2000 ………………………………….. p. 104 The Farm Animal Campaign: From Reforming Slaughter Methods to Vegetarianism ………… p. 109 HSUS 1970 - 1980 ……………………………………. p. 112 PETA 1980 - 1990 …………………………………….. p. 116 HSUS 1980 - 2000 …………………………………….. p. 119 The Laboratory Animal Campaign: From Support of the Scientific Community to Skepticism …….. p. 127 HSUS 1970 - 1980 ………………………………………. p. 130 viii PETA 1980 - 1990 ………………………………………. p. 134 HSUS 1980 - 2000 ………………………………………. p. 139 Conclusion …………………………………………………………. p. 147 CHAPTER 5: NEW CHALLENGES TO OUR USE OF THE EARTH: REARTICULATING OUR RELATIONSHIP ………………………….. p. 150 The Dam Campaign – From Prevention to Removal ………………. p. 152 Sierra Club 1970 - 1980 ………………………………. p. 155 Earthfirst! 1980 - 1990 ………………………………… p. 158 Sierra Club 1980 - 2000 ………………………………... p. 163 The Logging Campaign: From Suggestions For Forest Practices To A Ban On Cutting Old-Growth ……………………………… p. 169 Sierra Club 1970 - 1980 …………………………………. p. 172 Earthfirst! 1980 - 1990 ………………………………….. p. 175 Sierra Club 1980 - 2000 ………………………………… p. 180 The Grazing Campaign: From Partners to Adversaries …………… p. 187 Sierra Club 1970 - 1980 ………………………………… p. 189 Earthfirst! 1980 - 1990 ………………………………….. p. 192 Sierra Club 1980 - 2000 …………………………………. p. 198 Conclusion …………………………………………………………. p. 205 CHAPTER 6: THE IMPACT OF RADICALIZED RHETORIC ON MATERIAL RESOURCES …………………………………………………………… p. 208 ix Findings …………………………………………………………… p. 216 Analysis …………………………………………………………… p. 222 Conclusion ………………………………………………………… p. 227 CHAPTER 7: WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS - NEW DIRECTION FOR RESEARCH AND THE MOVEMENTS ……………………………….. p. 229 Chapter Summary ………………………………………………….. p. 229 Importance of the Project ………………………………………….. p. 234 Alternative Influences: Future Directions ……………………. p. 240 Current Context ………………………………………………. p. 247 Bibliography ……………………………………………………….. p. 250 Vita …………………………………………………………………. p. 267 x LIST OF FIGURES HSUS Membership, Part 1: 1976 - 1984 ……………………………… p. 216 HSUS Membership, Part 2: 1985 - 2001 ………………………………. p. 217 HSUS Revenues, 1975 - 1999 ………………………………………… p. 218 Sierra Club Membership, 1970 - 1997 .……………………………….. p. 219 Sierra Club Revenues, 1970 - 1999 …………………………………… p. 220 xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Thirty years ago, the only question a woman might ask herself when buying a fur coat was - mink or sable? At that time, vegetarianism was only for hippies and the vast majority of the general public accepted the use of lab animals for scientific purposes as unproblematic. Thirty years ago, no politician would even consider a proposal to tear down existing dams. In the 1970s, ancient trees were more economically valuable and therefore more likely to be cut than second growth. Government agencies were also assumed to manage public lands in the interest of the public. A lot has changed from 1970 to 2000. Buying fur has an element of shame to it, celebrities from Kim Bassinger to Alec Baldwin are touting their vegetarian status, and many major research centers have established ethics committees to oversee animal experimentation. Former Secretary of the Interior, Dan Hodel, has publicly announced his support for the removal of Glen Canyon dam. Trees-sitters protecting old-growth forests resonate with the public and several pieces of legislation have prevented logging ancient trees, despite their economic value. Finally, the public is beginning to question the interest of government agencies such as the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Public comments on environmental impact statements have grown tremendously. There have been many changes. But how do 1 such changes come about? While a multitude of influences exist in any notable societal shift, social movements have historically been an important catalyst. Social movements provide a place to speak up, object, oppose, and dissent when others in the society are still silent. Participants in social
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internship at Peta, Berlin: a Perfect Experience for Anyone Interested in Animal Protection
    INTERNSHIP AT PETA, BERLIN: A PERFECT EXPERIENCE FOR ANYONE INTERESTED IN ANIMAL PROTECTION In this chronicle, I will describe Scandinavia and Southern Europe, many areas in which the organization my curricular internship at PETA’s PETA Germany covers animal rights works. Germany office in Berlin, realized issues all over Eastern Europe. The under Krishna Singh1 ’s tutorship organization also has other affiliates: Communication from May 22nd till June 8th of. PETA France, PETA Netherlands, According to the country’s context or This document first describes the the issue at stake, PETA deals with organization itself and its areas of the question of how to communicate work (1) as well as its welcoming and about animal rights issue. To this end, friendly office in Berlin (2) and goes it builds relations with politicians, on describing the different tasks lobbies, journalists, scientists, vegan and projects I participated in and start-ups, celebrities (vegans and the experience I gained through this non-vegans). Among other things, amazing internship (3). PETA tries to inform politicians about 1. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL difficult situations concerning non- human animals and incite them to TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA)’s PETA Switzerland, PETA Asia/Pacific PRESENTATION and PETA Australia. ‘People for the Ethical Treatment of PETA’s goal is ‘to uncover animal Animals ‘(PETA) was first founded in abuse, educate the public, and the USA in 1980 by Ingrid Newkirk encourage people to make lifestyle and Alex Pacheco. With more than changes so that animals can live 6.5 million members and supporters, their lives free from exploitation2’ PETA USA is now the largest animal .
    [Show full text]
  • WHEN PETA COMES to CAMPUS: a STUDY of ISSUES MANAGEMENT at a LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY by MICHELLE HAMILTON Bachelor of Science In
    WHEN PETA COMES TO CAMPUS: A STUDY OF ISSUES MANAGEMENT AT A LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY By MICHELLE HAMILTON Bachelor of Science in Animal Science Murray State University Murray, Kentucky 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 WHEN PETA COMES TO CAMPUS: A STUDY OF ISSUES MANAGEMENT AT A LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY Thesis Approved: Dr. Traci L. Naile Thesis Adviser Dr. D. Dwayne Cartmell II Dr. Angel N. Riggs ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The pursuit of education has always been a top priority for me and with it the goal of a graduate degree. Here is to all of the people who made it possible: To my mother and father for instilling the insatiable appetite for education in me from an early age, for the courage to chase my dreams – no matter how far they take me from home, and for believing in me every step of the way. To Jackie, my sister and best friend, thank you for the encouragement to always follow my heart and be true to myself. McCauley, thank you for always looking at me through the rose-colored glasses only a baby sister has for a big sister. It’s that look that always reminds to be the best I can. To the AQHA Marketing gals, thanks for all the laughs when I was ready to meltdown in the midst of this adventure. C.J.B, thank you for going on late-night Diet Coke and ice cream runs and for not strangling me when I did have those meltdowns.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    PERSPECTIVES several organizations that were set up to SCIENCE AND SOCIETY continue the campaign. In both the United States and Europe, the debate about animal experimentation waned Animal experimentation: with the advent of the First World War, only to re-emerge during the 1970s, when anti- the continuing debate vivisection and animal-welfare organizations joined forces to campaign for new legislation to regulate animal research and testing. In the Mark Matfield United States, the public debate re-emerged in a more dramatic fashion in 1980, when an The use of animals in research and there was considerable protest from some activist infiltrated the laboratory of Dr Edward development has remained a subject of members of the audience and that, after one Taub of the Institute of Behavioural Research public debate for over a century. Although animal had been injected, an eminent med- at Silver Spring, Maryland (BOX 1). This attack there is good evidence from opinion surveys ical figure summoned the magistrates to on Taub’s research was organized by a tiny that the public accepts the use of animals in prevent the demonstration from continuing. animal-rights group called People for the research, they are poorly informed about the The Royal Society for the Prevention of Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which way in which it is regulated, and are Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) brought a pros- has since grown to dominate the campaign in increasingly concerned about laboratory- ecution for cruelty, and several of the doctors the United States. animal welfare. This article will review how present at the demonstration gave evidence public concerns about animal against Magnan, who returned to France to The anatomy of the campaign experimentation developed, the recent avoid answering the charges.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-04-20-Pawpac-Letter-Animal-Markets.Pdf
    April 20, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom, California State Governor 1303 10th Street, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Dr. Nadine Burke Harris, California Surgeon General California Health and Human Services 1600 Ninth Street, Room 460 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom and Dr. Burke Harris, We urge you to end the commercial wildlife 1 trade and sale for human consumption in California, including a ban on the import of nonnative birds, reptiles and amphibians. We also earnestly ask you to establish—with all the legal power vested in you—the rigorous enforcement of such bans and existing laws against the illegal trade of wild animals. With public health now teetering on the threat of the next pandemic, swift action is needed. _________________________________ 1 For this document, the term ‘wildlife’ means wild animals in the wild or bred in captivity. 2 The latest figures from Johns Hopkins University show that COVID-19 is responsible for 2.4 million cases and 165,000 deaths worldwide, including nearly 1,200 in California. Prohibitions and absolute strict enforcement against illegal wildlife trade and wildlife markets will help to prevent future zoonotic pandemics. We are grateful for your leadership in California and the nation during this crisis. We urge you now to put the prevention of future pandemics at the top of your priority list, even as you, your team and our state, city and county officials and industry professionals struggle in real time to save lives. Surgeon General Dr. Burke Harris and Governor Newsom, we ask you now to take swift action to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Species
    1 BETWEEN THE SPECIES Reflections on Tom Regan and the Animal Rights Movement That Once Was Gary L. Francione Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of Law and Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Scholar of Law and Philosophy Rutgers University School of Law New Jersey, U.S.A. Honorary Professor (Philosophy) School of Politics, Philosophy, and Language and Communication Studies University of East Anglia Norwich, U.K. Volume 21, Issue 1 Spring 2018 http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/ 2 Gary L. Francione The Beginning of a Real Rights Movement Let me set the scene: On July 15, 1985, a group of approxi- mately 100 animal rights activists, one of whom is Tom Regan, have taken over a building at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland. They are protesting head-injury experiments that are being conducted on baboons at the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania (Penn) Medical School. The protesters have announced that they will occupy the building unless and until the government agrees to at least suspend funding for the lab pending a full investigation. The government is threatening to arrest the protesters if they do not leave. As a large group of exhausted, unwashed, and nervous pro- testors crowded around him in rapt attention in a large but cramped NIH office, fearing their apparently inevitable arrest, Tom calmed and refocused them by recounting the history of nonviolent protest in various social movements and by reas- suring them about how such protest had been crucial to those struggles. Tom was a terrific storyteller, and his tales and his knowledge of social justice movements engaged and energized this group day after day for almost four days straight, helping the protestors regain their courage and understand how what they were doing was important, both as a matter of our opposi- tion to the experiments we were protesting and as part of our greater goal to achieve justice for nonhuman animals.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ought We to Live with Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singerâ•Žs Answer: Animal Liberation Part I
    BETWEEN THE SPECIES Issue IX August 2009 http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ How Ought We To Live With Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singer’s Answer: Animal Liberation Parts I & II (two papers) PART I Lesley McLean University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia Email address: [email protected] Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Abstract In this paper and the next I discuss Peter Singer’s approach to answering the question of how one ought to live with nonhuman animals. In the first paper I situate Singer’s work within the larger historical context of moral concern for animals, looking at previous public consensus on the issue, its breakdown and its re-emergence with Singer in the 1970s. In the second paper, I take a closer look at Singer’s highly influential book, Animal Liberation (1975), and argue that as activist literature, his chapter on animal experimentation for example can be seen as morally persuasive in ways other than simply as an example of (the consequences) of speciesism. How I do this is to place Singer’s work side by side that of 19th century activist Francis Power Cobbe’s, in particular her pamphlet Light in Dark Places (1883), and examine their work against the criticisms from scientists defending the practice of animal experimentation. Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Peter Singer played a key role in bringing a particular moral problem to light; he came to name this problem in a now famous philosophical treatise. Animal Liberation was first published as a review essay in The New York Review of Books (NYRB) and two years later, in 1975, as a full-length book published by the New York Review.
    [Show full text]
  • One Person's Efforts
    ONE PERSON'S EFFORTS II\JGRID I\JEWKIRK People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals When I was fourteen, I was sitting in my dining room enjoying lW1ch when I saw an ox cart stop in front of the window. The ox, or to save enough money to go back to my beach­ bullock, was emaciated, weak, and exhausted. combing days on the Costa del Sol. He faltered W1der the heavy yoke of the cart, no longer able to move, despite the blows Living in an old Maryland river settle­ striking his back. As I watched, my heart in ment called "Seneca," my neighbors were a my mouth, the ox driver dismoW1ted, raised rowdy bW1ch who ate squirrel pie and occa­ the bullock I s tail, and thrust the driving sionally shot over the fence when they'd had stick--a heavy wooden pole~-deep into the one too many jiggers of rye. When the father animal's rectum. The bullock bellowed, stum­ of the family died, his brood moved to the bled, and collapsed. As I rushed out, big city, leaving behind an interesting col­ screaming at the driver to stop, I promised lection of auto parts and nineteen cats. myself that when I grew up I would come back to India to help animals escape such treat­ 'Ihe cats had long been in the habit of ment. dropping their litters in my Volkswagen bus, seeking shelter in my basement, and eating my Each winter I returned to New Delhi from cats' food, but such a large, permanent addi­ my boarding school in the snowcaps of the tion to my family of cats, chickens, dogs, Himalayas.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2016 Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement Elan L. Abrell Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1345 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SAVING ANIMALS: EVERYDAY PRACTICES OF CARE AND RESCUE IN THE US ANIMAL SANCTUARY MOVEMENT by ELAN LOUIS ABRELL A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ELAN LOUIS ABRELL All Rights Reserved ii Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Chair of Examining Committee _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Gerald Creed Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Katherine Verdery Melissa Checker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell Advisor: Jeff Maskovsky This multi-sited ethnography of the US animal sanctuary movement is based on 24 months of research at a range of animal rescue facilities, including a companion animal shelter in Texas, exotic animal sanctuaries in Florida and Hawaii, and a farm animal sanctuary in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 REPORT REPORT Conference, Regional Regional Planning Planning Conference, for Co-Sponsored Co-Sponsored by by Action
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@CalPoly 52 E&A 111/2111/2 REPORT�REPORT campaign, and the effort to convince major food chains to pt'ovide alterna­ tive vegetarian options; a report by Regional Planning Conference,�Conference, Daryl Elliot on the current status of co-sponsored by Action for�for the ARM coalition; an account by Life, Animal Rights�Rights Sheila Schwartz of the humane educa­ Mobilization, and Animal�Animal tion task force's college outreach Rights Network�Network effort; a report by George P. Cave on March 12-14, 1982�1982 Trans-Species Unlimited's campaign to Washington, D.C.�D.C. ban the decompression chamber in Pennsylvania; an account by Lia Albo of the Fund for Animals' effort to halt The principal purpose of the rabbit clubbing in Idaho; an update Regional Planning Conference held by Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco March 12-14 at George Washington of PETA on the status of seventeen University in Washington, D. C. was to monkeys removed last September from · give participants in the various task the Institute of Behavioral Research forces formed at the Action for Life under Maryland cruelty laws; and a Conference last July (see E&A 11/3) report by Holly Jensen of the effort and the Mobilization for Animal Rights to outlaw pound seizure in Florida. Conference last October (see E&A 11/4) the opportunity to get together The .conference also included a to discuss progress to date, compare "Personal Development and Public Per­ notes, and plan further strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF – JCAS Volume 13, Issue 1, December 2015
    Volume 13, Issue 1, 2015 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Journal for Critical Animal Studies Editorial Executive Board _____________________________________________________________________________ Interim Editor Dr. Sean Parson [email protected] Editorial Board For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Board please see the JCAS link on the Institute for Critical Animal Studies website: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/?page_id=393 Cover Art Photograph from by John Lupinacci with permission. Volume 13, Issue 1, December 2015 i Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X JCAS Volume 13, Issue 1, October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Issue Introduction………………………………………………….………………………………...1-4 ESSAYS Animals within the Rousseauian Republic Parker Schill………………… ………………………………………………………………..6-32 Tensions between Multicultural Rights and the Rights of Domesticated and Liminal Animals: An Analysis of Will Kymlicka and Sue Donaldson’s Philosophy Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues……………………………………………………….…………….33-65 Home is Where the Food Is: Barriers to Vegetarianism and Veganism in the Domestic Sphere Kathryn Asher and Elizabeth Cherry…………………………………………...…………….66-91 Challenging Sexism while Supporting Speciesism: The Views of Estonian Feminist on Animal Liberation and Its Links to Feminism Kadri Aavik and Dagmar Kase …………………………..…………………………………92-127 FILM REVIEWS Review: Interstellar (2014) Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues ………………………………….………………………………128-135 Review: This is Hope: Green Vegans and the New Human Ecology (2013) by Will Anderson
    [Show full text]
  • Join Us in Saving 55,000 Children and 600 Million Homeless Dogs, and Then Homeless Cats!
    Join us in saving 55,000 children and 600 million homeless dogs, and then homeless cats! Every 10 minutes: A child dies from rabies ... according to the World Health Organization. Every 10 minutes: 200 people suffer from painful rabies injections. Every 10 minutes: 11,000 homeless puppies are born. Every year 55,000 people, mostly children, die from rabies. Almost all are infected by stray dogs. Rabies is a painful way to die, involving convulsions so violent, that many infected children must be literally tied down by their hands and feet, and they are kept tied down ... until they die. Another disturbing fact: By the time any symptoms appear in humans, it’s too late, and death is guaranteed. Yes, you read that correctly: by the time symptoms appear, it is 100% fatal ... and there is no cure. So what can be done? Right now the primary action being taken is to: Kill the stray dogs ... or attempt to carry out the labor-intensive process of physically capturing each dog one at a time, and then manually vaccinating each dog one at a time. There are an estimated 600 million stray dogs worldwide, who give birth each year to an estimated one billion homeless puppies - who continue to reproduce uncontrolled, repeating the cycle. Many live in a constant state of hunger, and suffer from painful diseases which are never treated. Most die in pain before the age of three. We have a better way. Spay and Neuter Cookies are being developed to end this suffering. Once completed, a single edible Cookie will safely sterilize a stray - without surgery - and pave the way to ending the stray dog overpopulation problem, and preventing the deaths of the 55,000 children who currently die each year due to rabies from stray dogs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Research Controversy 1994 APPENDIX I 183
    APPENDIX I A. LISTING OF ANIMAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATIONS For the sake of brevity, the terms "animal rights," "animal welfare" and "animal protection" are used as follows. "Animal rights" refers to individuals or groups who have fundamental objections to both animal killing and animal suffering. "Animal welfare" refers to individuals or groups who have fundamental objections to causing animal suffering but who are prepared to accept the painless killing of animals for "necessary" human ends. "Animal protection" is a more general, collective term for all groups (including the two just described) inter­ ested in promoting the well being of animals. This is not a complete list of all animal protection groups, or even all that address animal research issues in some form. However, most of those that contribute to the public debate in a significant way are included. American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) Suite 204, Noble Plaza, 801 Old York Road, Jenkintown, PA 19046 (215/887-0816) 1992 budget - $988,000; assets - $5.8 million The AAVS was the first anti-vivisection (AV) society in the U.S. (fow1ded in 1883). It formed a loose partnership with the National and New England AV Societies in the J 970s and 1980s when all three became more active in the debate after a long period of relative dormancy (other than mailings to their own supporters). Under former executive director Bernard Unti (a historian and bibliophile), the organization started to develop more detailed (i.e. scientific) criticisms of animal research and contracted with Dr. Robert Sharpe, a British chemist and antivivisectionist, to prepare material for brochures and pamphlets.
    [Show full text]