DOCSLIB.ORG

North Carolina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Carolina THE DOCUMENTARY HISTORY OF THE RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION Ratification of the Constitution by the States NORTH CAROLINA [Supplement] Editors JOHN P. KAMINSKI CHARLES H. SCHOENLEBER JONATHAN M. REID GASPARE J. SALADINO MARGARET R. FLAMINGO TIMOTHY D. MOORE DAVID P. FIELDS DUSTIN M. COHAN THOMAS H. LINLEY Editorial Assistants SARAH K. DANFORTH ANNA M. BIERMEIER CHRISTOPHER S. BERRY MADISON WISCONSIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRESS 2 0 2 0 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... vi Symbols ........................................................................................................................................................... vii Part I Documents (Transcriptions) .................................................................................................................. 1 1. Pennsylvania Packet, 7 July 1787 ................................................................................................................. 1 2. William Blount to Governor Richard Caswell, New York, 19 July 1787 .................................................. 2 3. Petersburg Virginia Gazette, 19 July 1787 ................................................................................................... 4 4. Hugh Williamson to James Iredell, Philadelphia, 22 July 1787 ................................................................. 4 5. New York Daily Advertiser, 23 July 1787 ................................................................................................... 4 6. Archibald Maclaine to James Iredell, Wilmington, N.C., 29 August 1787 ............................................... 4 7. James Iredell to Hannah Iredell, Halifax, N.C., 21 October 1787 ............................................................ 5 8. James White to William Blount, Philadelphia, 25 October 1787 ............................................................. 6 9. Maryland Journal, 6 November 1787 .......................................................................................................... 6 10. To Henry Lutterloch, Wilmington, N.C., 10 November 1787 ................................................................ 6 11. William Attmore: Journal of a Tour to North Carolina, 29 November 1787 ......................................... 7 12. State Gazette of North Carolina, 29 November 1787 ............................................................................... 7 13. Draft Bill Enforcing the Attendance of Freeholders at Elections 29 November 1787 ................................................................................................................................ 7 14. North Carolina General Assembly: Balloting for Place for Holding the Convention and General Assembly, 6 December 1787 ...................................................................... 8 15. Governor Richard Caswell to the North Carolina General Assembly Tarborough, N.C., 10 December 1787 ................................................................................................ 8 16. Pennsylvania Packet, 20 December 1787 .................................................................................................. 9 17. New York Daily Advertiser, 21 December 1787 ...................................................................................... 9 18. North Carolina General Assembly: Additional Appropriation for Hodge and Blanchard, 21 December 1787 ......................................................................................... 9 19. North Carolina House of Commons, 21 December 1787 ..................................................................... 10 20. William Attmore: Journal of a Tour to North Carolina, 21 December 1787 ....................................... 10 21. Governor Edmund Randolph to Governor Richard Caswell Richmond, Va., 27 December 1787 ................................................................................................... 10 22. William Hooper to James Iredell, Hillsborough, N.C., c. December 1787.......................................... 10 23. Gazette of the State of Georgia, 10 January 1787 ................................................................................... 11 24. Pennsylvania Mercury, 10 January 1788 .................................................................................................. 12 25. James Madison to George Washington, New York, 14 January 1788 ................................................... 12 26. New York Journal, 17 January 1788 ........................................................................................................ 12 27. Governor Samuel Johnston to Governor Edmund Randolph Edenton, N.C., 22 January 1788 ......................................................................................................... 12 28. Petersburg Virginia Gazette, 31 January 1788 ......................................................................................... 12 29. William Heath: Diary, 12 February 1788 ............................................................................................... 13 30. William Heath: Diary, 22 February 1788 ............................................................................................... 13 31. Maryland Journal, 29 February 1788 ....................................................................................................... 13 32.1–32.134. Hillsborough Convention Election Certificates, March 1788 ................................................ 13 33. Governor Samuel Johnston to James White, Edenton, N.C., 5 March 1788 ....................................... 13 34. Richard Dobbs Spaight to Levi Hollingsworth, New Bern, N.C., 25 April 1788 .................................. 14 35. John Skinner to John Gray Blount, Perquimans County, N.C., 21 May 1788 ...................................... 14 36. Governor Thomas Pinckney to the Governor of North Carolina Charleston, S.C., 24 May 1788 ........................................................................................................... 14 37. James Iredell to Hannah Iredell, New Bern, N.C., 27 May 1788 .......................................................... 14 38. Thomas Iredell to James Iredell, Edenton, N.C., 27 May 1788 ............................................................ 15 39. Hugh Williamson to Governor Samuel Johnston, New York, 30 May 1788 ........................................ 15 40. Samuel A. Otis to Theodore Sedgwick, New York, 6 June 1788 .......................................................... 15 41. New Haven Gazette, 12 June 1788 .......................................................................................................... 15 42. James Iredell to John Gray Blount, Edenton, N.C., 29 June 1788 ........................................................ 16 43. Andrew Craigie to Samuel Rogers, 30 June 1788 ................................................................................... 16 ii 44. James Cogswell: Diary, Scotland, Connecticut, 3 July 1788 ................................................................... 16 45. John Swann to James Iredell, New York, 7 July 1788 ............................................................................ 16 46. Joseph Martin to Secretary at War Henry Knox, Henry County, Va., 10 July 1788 ............................ 17 47. Massachusetts Centinel, 12 July 1788 ...................................................................................................... 17 48. Henry E. McCulloh to James Iredell, Newman-Street, London, 16 July 1788 ..................................... 18 49. A–M. North Carolina Convention Journal, 21 July–4 August 1788 ...................................................... 18 49-A. North Carolina Convention Journal, 21 July 1788................................................................ 18 49-B. North Carolina Convention Journal, 22 July 1788 ................................................................ 18 49-C. North Carolina Convention Journal, 23 July 1788 ................................................................ 20 49-D. North Carolina Convention Journal, 24 July 1788 ............................................................... 21 49-E. North Carolina Convention Journal, 25 July 1788 ................................................................ 22 49-F. North Carolina Convention Journal, 26 July 1788 ................................................................ 23 49-G. North Carolina Convention Journal, 28 July 1788 ............................................................... 23 49-H. North Carolina Convention Journal, 29 July 1788 ............................................................... 23 49-I. North Carolina Convention Journal, 30 July 1788 ................................................................. 24 49-J. North Carolina Convention Journal, 31 July 1788 ................................................................. 24 49-K. North Carolina Convention Journal, 1 August 1788 ............................................................ 25 49-L. North Carolina Convention Journal, 2 August 1788 ............................................................. 33 49-M. North Carolina Convention Journal, 4 August 1788 ............................................................ 36 50. North Carolina Convention, Rules, 22 July 1788 ................................................................................... 38 51. North Carolina Convention:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEAES Guide: the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
    PEAES Guide: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania http://www.librarycompany.org/Economics/PEAESguide/hsp.htm Keyword Search Entire Guide View Resources by Institution Search Guide Institutions Surveyed - Select One The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 19107 215-732-6200 http://www.hsp.org Overview: The entries in this survey highlight some of the most important collections, as well as some of the smaller gems, that researchers will find valuable in their work on the early American economy. Together, they are a representative sampling of the range of manuscript collections at HSP, but scholars are urged to pursue fruitful lines of inquiry to locate and use the scores of additional materials in each area that is surveyed here. There are numerous helpful unprinted guides at HSP that index or describe large collections. Some of these are listed below, especially when they point in numerous directions for research. In addition, the HSP has a printed Guide to the Manuscript Collections of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania (HSP: Philadelphia, 1991), which includes an index of proper names; it is not especially helpful for searching specific topics, item names, of subject areas. In addition, entries in the Guide are frequently too brief to explain the richness of many collections. Finally, although the on-line guide to the manuscript collections is generally a reproduction of the Guide, it is at present being updated, corrected, and expanded. This survey does not contain a separate section on land acquisition, surveying, usage, conveyance, or disputes, but there is much information about these subjects in the individual collections reviewed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch 5 NC Legislature.Indd
    The State Legislature The General Assembly is the oldest governmental body in North Carolina. According to tradition, a “legislative assembly of free holders” met for the first time around 1666. No documentary proof, however, exists proving that this assembly actually met. Provisions for a representative assembly in Proprietary North Carolina can be traced to the Concessions and Agreements, adopted in 1665, which called for an unicameral body composed of the governor, his council and twelve delegates selected annually to sit as a legislature. This system of representation prevailed until 1670, when Albemarle County was divided into three precincts. Berkeley Precinct, Carteret Precinct and Shaftsbury Precinct were apparently each allowed five representatives. Around 1682, four new precincts were created from the original three as the colony’s population grew and the frontier moved westward. The new precincts were usually allotted two representatives, although some were granted more. Beginning with the Assembly of 1723, several of the larger, more important towns were allowed to elect their own representatives. Edenton was the first town granted this privilege, followed by Bath, New Bern, Wilmington, Brunswick, Halifax, Campbellton (Fayetteville), Salisbury, Hillsborough and Tarborough. Around 1735 Albemarle and Bath Counties were dissolved and the precincts became counties. The unicameral legislature continued until around 1697, when a bicameral form was adopted. The governor or chief executive at the time, and his council constituted the upper house. The lower house, the House of Burgesses, was composed of representatives elected from the colony’s various precincts. The lower house could adopt its own rules of procedure and elect its own speaker and other officers.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Obituaries Courier Tribune Name Date of Paper Page # Date of Death Abbott, Blannie Allen 7-Aug-84 7A 6-Aug-84
    North Carolina Obituaries Courier Tribune Name Date of Paper Page # Date of Death Abbott, Blannie Allen 7-Aug-84 7A 6-Aug-84 Abbott, Douglas L. 1-Sep-82 12A 30-Aug-82 Abbott, Helen Hartsook 3-Dec-82 9A 2-Dec-82 Abbott, Molly Jeane 3-Nov-81 8A 31-Oct-81 Abbott, Nora Johnson Mitchell 14-Oct-83 12A 13-Oct-83 Abbott, Roger 1-Aug-84 6A 31-Jul-84 Abercrombie, Dodd 5-Oct-80 6A 3-Oct-80 Abernathy, Ray Paul 29-Jun-80 8A 28-Jun-80 Abernathy, Shaun Travis 24-May-83 8A 24-May-83 Abrams, Reagan Vincent 28-Sep-80 6A 26-Sep-80 Abston, Thomas Earl 30-Dec-82 10A 29-Dec-82 Ackerman, Elsie K. 20-Apr-82 8A 19-Apr-82 Acree, Una Mae Phillips 6-Jul-81 6A 5-Jul-81 Adams, Anna Threadgill 9-Dec-85 9A 8-Dec-85 Adams, Annie Vaughn 12-Mar-85 6A 11-Mar-85 Adams, Bernice Hooper 6-Jul-82 8A 5-Jul-82 Adams, Dora Carrick 13-Jun-80 10A 12-Jun-80 Adams, Edward Vance 23-May-83 6A 23-May-83 Adams, Herman Hugh Sr. 29-Oct-81 8A 27-Oct-81 Adams, James Clifton 18-Sep-84 9A 17-Sep-84 Adams, John Edwin 1-Mar-84 10A 29-Feb-84 Adams, T.B. 15-Oct-82 10A 14-Oct-82 Adams, Velma D. 11-Aug-81 8A 10-Aug-81 Adcock, Plackard C. 6-Jul-82 8A 5-Jul-82 Aderholt, Daniel H. 17-May-85 10A 13-May-85 Adkins, Clarence Odell 1-Jan-85 7A 1-Jan-85 Adkins, E.G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Constitution
    THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Bluegrass Ballroom I Lexington Convention Center Lexington, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenter .................................................................................................................. i The Framers' Coup ......................................................................................................... 1 Interpreting the Convention .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNOR ALEXANDER MARTIN (First Administration), 1781-1785, N.D
    Governors’ Papers 1 Alexander Martin GOVERNOR ALEXANDER MARTIN (First Administration), 1781-1785, n.d. Arrangement: By record series, then chronological Reprocessed by: James Mark Valsame Date: September 3, 2009 Alexander Martin (1738 – November 2, 1807), merchant, lawyer, legislator, governor, and senator, was born at Lebanon, Amwell Township, Hunterdon County, NJ, the oldest son of Hugh and Jane Hunter Martin. Hugh Martin was born near Inniskilling, County Tyrone, Ireland, about 1700; Jane Hunter Martin was born in County Antrim, Ireland, about 1720. The two families migrated within a few years of each other in the late 1720s, landing at New Castle, DE, but settling soon afterwards in New Jersey, where Hugh and Jane first met and were married. Little is known of Alexander Martin’s childhood except for a comment of his brother that he did not speak a word until four. His father became a moderately prosperous farmer, served as a justice of the peace, and for a period conducted an English school. Alexander attended Francis Alison’s academy at New London, Connecticut, and then Newark College, which, while he was a student, was moved, under the direction of President Aaron Burr, to Princeton, N.J. Martin received A.B. (September 29,1756) and A.M. (1759) degrees from Princeton. After graduation he moved to Cumberland, Virginia, where, for just over a year, he served as a tutor to the son of N. Davies and conducted a school. He returned briefly to New Jersey, apparently on family business, before making a permanent move south to seek his fortune. Martin settled in Salisbury, NC, about 1760, and became a merchant.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1821 Insurrectionary Scare in Eastern North Carolina. (Under the Direction of James E
    ABSTRACT KAISER, JOHN JAMES. “Masters Determined to be Masters”: The 1821 Insurrectionary Scare in Eastern North Carolina. (Under the direction of James E. Crisp.) This thesis seeks to explain how the militia and patrols worked together in a flexible system designed to suppress both real and potential slave unrest. As the summer of 1821 neared its end, depredations committed by runaway slaves caused widespread alarm throughout Eastern North Carolina. Their depredations resulted in an insurrectionary scare that grew to include eight counties in Eastern North Carolina. Although documentation is sparse, there remains a trail of communications between militia officers and Governor Jesse Franklin detailing the scare from its inception. In addition, numerous militia officers wrote the Governor and General Assembly to justify their actions during and after the scare. These letters and petitions provide the story of the 1821 insurrectionary scare. Furthermore, this thesis will place the insurrectionary scare within the context of circumstances prevalent in Eastern North Carolina in 1821. These circumstances included an outbreak of yellow fever, extreme weather, harsh political bickering (both local and national), and a large (and increasing) slave population combined with White flight to the South and West. This thesis begins with the discussion of an unfortunate occurrence on Street’s Bridge that left several militiamen and citizens wounded. Their presence on the bridge was part of a system designed to ensure the subjugation of the local slave population. However, in a highly ironic twist of fate, these two groups of men (citizen and militia) encountered one another on Street’s Bridge. The exchange of fire that resulted caused several casualties on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • 4£—«(7')Mlu Ezdmp<:E__4U)<Au—1Om<Uibrz
    Z0rz.BI U<mOu—1a< U)E__4<:Pm DZELUm(7‘)£—«>4 COMMENCEMENT MAY 14I 2011 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT MAY 14, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Greetings from the Chancellor ............................................................................................. ii Exercises of Commencement...............................................................................................iii Musical Program ...................................................................................................................iv Academic Costume, Academic Honors, and the Alma Mater ........................................ v Honorary Degrees.................................................................................................................vi Robert Weiss ..............................................................................................................vi James E. Rogers ........................................................................................................vii Commencement Speaker, James E. Rogers .....................................................................Vii Time and Location for Departmental Ceremonies........................................................ viii ROTC Commissionees........................................................................................................... x Commencement Marshalls, Ushers, and Color Guard xi University Mace ................................................................................................................... xii University Medallion..........................................................................................................xiii
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 27 No 1 1980.Pdf
    (- ~ .. ......• '\ i~.. • Published by THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL. SOCIETY Memphis, Tennessee ... • VOLUME 27 SPRING, 1980 NUMBER 1 - CONTENTS - OVER THE EDITOR' DESK •••••• . · . ... .. 1 NEWS AND NOTES FROM OTHER PUBLICATIONS • . 2 BOOK REVIEWS . ... .. ·. 4 ( 1833 ENUMERAtION, FENTRESS COUNTY, TENNESSEE. · . 9 TENNESSEE NEWS ITEMS FROM MISSISSIPPI NEWSPAPERS • ·... .. 12 FAMILY GATHERINGS . .... .... .. · . · · · 13 BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE, LOOSE MARRIAGE BONDS AND LICENSES · · · 18 EXCERPT FROM REGISTER OF INTERMENTS AT THE NECROPOLIS · ·· 25 FAYETTE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, COURT MINUTES •• . 26 GREEN CEMETERY, FAYETTE COUNTY, TENNESSEE · . 31 ROGERS FAMILY BIBLE, JACKSON AND SMITH COUNTIES, TENNESSEE · . · ·· 32 INDEX TO 1840 CENSUS, WAYNE COUNTY, TENNESSEE • 33 WAYNE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, REVOLUTIONARY AND MILITARY PENSIONERS 39 JORDAN FAMILY BIBLE, OBION COUNTY, TENNESSEE •••• .. .. 39 WARREN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DEED BOOK E- Abstracts 40 QUERIES .... .. ....... ... .. .. ... 46 THE TENNESSEE GENEA~OGICAL SOCIETY P. 0, BOX 12124 .. Memphi S t Tennessee 38112 OFFICERS AND STAFF FO~ 1980 President Wilma Sutton Cogdell Vice President Jane C()ok Hollis Recordin~ Secretary Marilyn Johnson Baugus Correspondence Secretary R. F. Simpson, Jr. Librarian Louise +,ittsworth Tyus Assistant Librarian Evelyn Duncan Sigler Surname Index Secretary Betty Key Treasurer Mrs. Homer D. Turner Editor Associate Editor Herbert Ray Ashworth Director Eleanor Riggins Barham Director Laurence B. Gardiner LIBRARY STAFF EDITORIAL STAFF BUSINESS STAFF Lucile Hendren Cox Betsy Foster West . Pauline Casey Briscoe Myrtle Louise Shelton Henrietta D. Gilley Lynn Hodges Craven Herman L. Bogan Betty Cline Miller Jessie Taylor Webb Eleanor W. Griffin Helen Culbreath Hamer Sarah Duncan Blalock Jean Alexander West Amelia Pike Eddlemon Thomas Proctor Hughes, Jr. Elizabeth Riggins Nichols "ANSEARCHIN'" NEWS is the official publication of THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL p~blished SOCIETY; quarterly in March t June,September, and December; annual subscription $8.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Dutchess
    OF DUTCHESS /680 ,.,/807 Cover: DANIEL CROMMELIN VERPLANCK 1762-1834 Painted by John Singlecon Copley in 1771 CottrteJy of The Metropolitan J\f11Jeum of Art New York. Gift of Bayard Verplanck, 1949 (See page 42) OF DUTCHESS /680-/807 by S. Velma Pugsley Spo11sored by THE DUTCHESS COUNTY AMERICAN REVOLUTION BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION as a 1976 Project Printed by HAMILTON REPRODUCTIONS, Inc. Poughkeepsie, N. Y. FOREWORD The Bicentennial Project rirled "Portraits of Dutchess 1680-1807" began as a simple, personal arrempr ro catalog existing porrrairs of people whose lives were part of rhe county's history in rhe Colonial Period. As rhe work progressed ir became certain rhar relatively few were srill in the Durchess-Purnam area. As so many of rhem had become the property of Museums in other localities it seemed more important than ever ro lisr rhem and their present locations. When rhe Dutchess County American Revolution Bicentennial Commission with great generosity undertook rhe funding ir was possible ro illustrate rhe booklet with photographs from rhe many available sources. This document is nor ro be considered as a geneological or historic record even though much research in rhose directions became a necessity. The collection is meant ro be a pictorial record, only, hoping rhar irs readers may be made more aware rhar these paintings are indeed pictures of our ancestors. Ir is also hoped rhar all museum collections of Colonial Painting will be viewed wirh deeper and more personal interest. The portraits which are privately owned are used here by rhe gracious consent of the owners. Those works from public sources are so indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Considers the Constitution
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 1987 Law and the Experience of Politics in Late Eighteenth-Century North Carolina: North Carolina Considers the Constitution Walter F. Pratt Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Walter F. Pratt, Law and the Experience of Politics in Late Eighteenth-Century North Carolina: North Carolina Considers the Constitution, 22 Wake Forest L. Rev. 577 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/378 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAW AND THE EXPERIENCE OF POLITICS IN LATE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY NORTH CAROLINA: NORTH CAROLINA CONSIDERS THE CONSTITUTION Walter F. Pratt,Jr.* In mid-summer 1788, nearly three hundred delegates assembled in Hillsborough to consider whether North Carolina would ratify the Consti- tution drafted the previous year in Philadelphia.1 When the convention began the delegates were certain of two facts: First, regardless of their decision, a government would soon be established; ten states had already ratified the Constitution, one more than necessary.2 Second, the oppo- nents of the Constitution knew they had a substantial majority in the * Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame. I am indebted to the editors of the Documentary History of the Constitutional Convention at the University of Wiscon- sin, Madison, for so graciously allowing me access to their files.
    [Show full text]
  • OBSERVANCE of SPECIAL DAYS
    i ! ii THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA THE COLLECTION OF NORTH CAROLINIANA 0394 K87p UNIVERSITY OF N.C. AT CHAPEL HILL 00034037391 FOR USE ONLY IN THE NORTH CAROLINA COLLECTION Form No. A-368, Rev. 8/95 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Ensuring Democracy through Digital Access (NC-LSTA) http://www.archive.org/details/observanceofspec1959nort A/ ^ -7 ,o OBSERVANCE of SPECIM DAYS FEBRUARY (;lNORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE FLAG OBSERVANCE of SPECIAL DAYS Issued by the: STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 1959 PUBLICATION NUMBER 319 FOREWORD The provision of suitable material for the observance of special days in the public schools of the State is authorized by law. In this publication we have selected a number of days which might be appropriately celebrated ; and have pointed out the significance of each of these days and made suggestions as to how they might be observed. It is the purpose of this publication to give meaning to the events that lay back of the days which are to be observed. The material, therefore, is presented in three main parts: (1) Historical; (2) Concepts to be learned ; and (3) Activities which may be performed. Resources for other material which the teacher may want to use are also given, a specific list with each "day" material and a general list at the end of the publica- tion. It is our hope that teachers, principals and supervisors will use this bulletin as a guide in conveying to our boys and girls the significance of days which we observe and that they will learn the values inherent in such observance, I wish to thank the following committee for the preparation of this guide: L.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]