DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Concepts for the Transition of the Energy System Into a Smart, Sustainable and Renewable Energy System in the TRACER Target Regions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Concepts for the Transition of the Energy System Into a Smart, Sustainable and Renewable Energy System in the TRACER Target Regions TRACER Technical concepts for the transition Smart strategies for the transition in coal intensive regions Project No: 836819 Technical concepts for the transition of the energy system into a smart, sustainable and renewable energy system in the TRACER target regions WP 3 – Task 3.3 / D 3.2 July 2020 July 2020 GET TRACER Technical concepts for the transition Authors: Christian Doczekal, Güssing Energy Technologies, Austria Lulin Radulov, Black Sea Energy Research Centre, Bulgaria Angel Nikolaev, Black Sea Energy Research Centre, Bulgaria Jan Frouz, Charles University, Czech Republic Markéta Hendrychová, Charles University, Czech Republic Rainer Schlepphorst, Research Institute for Post-Mining Landscapes, Germany Anne Rademacher, Research Institute for Post-Mining Landscapes, Germany Dirk Knoche, Research Institute for Post-Mining Landscapes, Germany Charalampos Malamatenios, Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, Greece Georgia Veziryianni, Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, Greece Marcin Pietrzykowski, University of Agriculture, Poland Marcin Chodak, University of Agriculture, Poland Justyna Likus-Cieślik, University of Agriculture, Poland Marek Pająk, University of Agriculture, Poland Bartłomiej Woś, University of Agriculture, Poland Cristina Dima, ISPE – PC, Romania Gloria Popescu, ISPE – PC, Romania Marian Dobrin, ISPE – PC, Romania Emilia Dunca, AISVJ, Romania Sabina Irimie, AISVJ, Romania Miodrag Mesarovic, Energoprojekt Entel, Serbia Djordjina Milovanovic, Energoprojekt Entel, Serbia Jasmina Mandic Lukic, Energoprojekt Entel, Serbia Dmytro Bondzyk, Coal Energy Technology Institute, Ukraine Taras Shchudlo, Coal Energy Technology Institute, Ukraine Ihor Beztsenyi, Coal Energy Technology Institute, Ukraine Wilbert den Hoed, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, UK Sara Davies, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, UK Rona Michie, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, UK Editors: Rita Mergner, WIP Renewable Energy, Germany Rainer Janssen, WIP Renewable Energy, Germany Contact: Güssing Energy Technologies GmbH Christian Doczekal Email: [email protected] Tel: +43 3322 42606 331 Wiener Straße 49 7540 Güssing, Austria www.get.ac.at This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 836819. The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the INEA nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. TRACER website: www.tracer-h2020.eu July 2020 2 GET TRACER Technical concepts for the transition Contents 1 Executive summary ___________________________________________6 2 Introduction _________________________________________________6 3 Bulgaria, Yugoiztochen Region __________________________________7 3.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal ______________________________ 7 3.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants _______________________________________________ 7 3.1.2 Use of coal for small applications ___________________________________________________ 9 3.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 10 3.2.1 Biomass ______________________________________________________________________ 10 3.2.2 Electricity ____________________________________________________________________ 11 3.2.1 Solar energy in the South East Region (SER) _________________________________________ 11 3.2.2 Hydropower in the South East Region (SER) _________________________________________ 13 3.2.3 Wind power in the South East Region (SER) _________________________________________ 13 3.2.4 Electricity generation from biogas in the South East Region (SER) ________________________ 14 3.2.5 Contribution of the South East Region (SER) to the generation of electricity in Bulgaria _______ 15 3.2.6 Prices for heating comparison _____________________________________________________ 15 3.2.7 Initiatives for better and greener heating ____________________________________________ 16 3.2.8 Distributed RES generation ______________________________________________________ 17 3.3 Clean Energy for All Europeans package ____________________________________ 17 3.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 22 3.5 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________ 23 3.6 Key Actions: PEST Analyses on using coal ___________________________________ 24 3.7 Key Actions: Development of Hydrogen Technologies __________________________ 25 3.8 References ______________________________________________________________ 27 4 Czech Republic, North-West Bohemia ___________________________29 4.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal _____________________________ 29 4.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants ______________________________________________ 29 4.1.2 Use of coal for small applications __________________________________________________ 30 4.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 31 4.3 Technological challenges and opportunities ___________________________________ 32 4.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 35 4.5 References ______________________________________________________________ 36 5 Germany, Lusatian Lignite District/Economic Region Lusatia ________37 5.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal _____________________________ 37 5.1.1 Use of coal for small applications __________________________________________________ 43 5.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 43 5.3 Technological challenges and opportunities ___________________________________ 48 5.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 49 5.5 References ______________________________________________________________ 53 6 Greece, Western Macedonia Region _____________________________57 6.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal _____________________________ 57 July 2020 3 GET TRACER Technical concepts for the transition 6.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants ______________________________________________ 57 6.1.2 Use of coal for small applications __________________________________________________ 59 6.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 59 6.3 Technological challenges and opportunities ___________________________________ 60 6.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 63 6.5 References ______________________________________________________________ 66 7 Poland, Upper Silesia Region __________________________________67 7.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal _____________________________ 67 7.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants ______________________________________________ 67 7.1.2 Use of coal for small applications __________________________________________________ 69 7.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 70 7.3 Technological challenges and opportunities ___________________________________ 71 7.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 72 7.5 References ______________________________________________________________ 75 8 Romania, West Region / Jiu Valley ______________________________76 8.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal _____________________________ 76 8.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants ______________________________________________ 76 8.1.2 Use of coal for small applications __________________________________________________ 80 8.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies _________________________ 84 8.3 Technological challenges and opportunities ___________________________________ 89 8.3.1 Energy Technologies – Challenges _________________________________________________ 89 8.3.2 Energy Technologies - Opportunities _______________________________________________ 91 8.4 Technical energy transition concept _________________________________________ 95 8.5 References ______________________________________________________________ 98 9 Serbia, Kolubara region ______________________________________ 101 9.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal ____________________________ 101 9.1.1 Coal driven power plants and CHP plants __________________________________________ 101 9.1.2 Use of coal for small applications _________________________________________________ 104 9.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies ________________________ 107 9.3 Technological challenges and opportunities __________________________________ 109 9.4 Technical energy transition concept ________________________________________ 111 9.5 References _____________________________________________________________ 113 10 Ukraine, Donetsk region _____________________________________ 115 10.1 Current energy generation technologies using coal ____________________________ 115 10.1.1 Coal driven power plants, CHP plants _____________________________________________ 115 10.1.2 Use of coal for small applications _________________________________________________ 116 10.2 Current status of other energy generation technologies ________________________ 117 10.2.1 Solar energy in the Donetsk Region _______________________________________________ 118 10.2.2 Wind power in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Suffocating Grip of Coal
    The Suffocating Grip Of Coal Report on the effects of coal burning on human health november 2013 Contents 1. Summary and key messages 1 2. Coal-fired electricity generation: (no) prospects 3 3. Coal-fired power plants in Bulgaria 5 3.1 Thermal power plants in Bulgaria: overview 6 3.2 Energy production and energy consumption 8 in Bulgaria: plans and reality 4. Air pollution from coal burning in Bulgaria: 12 myths and reality 5. Coal burning: effects on human health 17 5.1 TPP in Bulgaria: impacts on human health 19 5.2 TPP in the Maritsa basin: impacts on human health 23 6. Alternatives 27 7. Conclusions and recommendations 29 #1 Summary and key messages Air pollution is a key cause of a number of diseases in Europe and Bulgaria. This Key messages premature deaths – four times report of Greenpeace Bulgaria on the the death toll of road accidents impact of coal burning on human health Air pollution with sulphur dioxide in Bulgaria in the same year demonstrates the close link between and particulate matter (PM) per human health and the energy policy and generated kilowatt-hour (kWh) of strategy of Bulgaria. electricity in thermal power plants (TPP) in Bulgaria is one of the Reliance on coal and new nuclear highest in Europe. capacities on the part of the Bulgarian These facts, as well as the government is ill-advised from both Most TPP in Bulgaria have installed filters for capturing of current economic crisis, economicly and environmentally sulphur dioxide and nitrogen require a comprehensive wise. Most importantly, it implies an oxides.
    [Show full text]
  • Koste Glavinića 8A, 11000 Belgrade
    Koste Glavinića 8a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Phone: +381 11 3691 477 Fax: +381 11 3690 823 http://www.ieent.org Company Information GENERAL In the year 2006 it has been 150 years since the birth of Nikola Tesla scientist, inventor and visionary, whose work have changed the world and significantly contributed development and speed progress of manhood and electrical engineering. At the same time, it has been 70 years since the president of Serbian Royal Academy of sciences, Mr Bogdan Gavrilovic, declared the establishment of Institute "Nikola Tesla" - "as a temple of science in the glory of his name and eternal beauty of his work". In its history that lasts more than seven decades, Institute passed through great number of changes and transformations in order to accommodate to changes in its surrounding and during that time changed its name and working area. Today, Electrical Engineering Institute "Nikola Tesla" is independent scientific - research joint - stock organization (98% owned by state, 2% owned by small shareholders) which activity covers a wide spectra of problems in the area of production, transmission, distribution and implementation of electrical energy. Nikola Tesla Institute Building At Koste Glavinića 8a St. in Belgrade 1 Company Information R&D PROFILE Our R&D profile presents synthesis of scientific and expert knowledge across a wide spectrum of disciplines: energy, high voltage, high power electronics, automation, computer science, measurement, information systems, and software engineering. By synthesis of scientific and engineering knowledge and experience Institute become admirable and authoritative scientific institution in our country and abroad in the area of electrical engineering, always ready to answer to the challenges of modern science and at the same time to respond to the necessities of domestic economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Feasibility Study for a Solar Power Precinct Final Report Enhancing and Sustaining the World’S Built, Natural and Social Environments
    Pre-Feasibility Study for a Solar Power Precinct Final report Enhancing and sustaining the world’s built, natural and social environments. ’ Pre-Feasibility Study for a Solar Power Precinct Table of Contents At a Glance i Executive Summary iii Glossary xiv 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 1 1.3 Scope and Deliverables 2 1.4 Document Structure 2 2.0 Methodology 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Phase 1: Technical and Environmental 3 Feasibility 3 2.16 Phase 2: Economics 9 2.17 Phase 3: Risk Assessment and Role for Government 9 2.18 Phase 4: Summary 9 3.0 Technical Assessment 11 3.1 Technology 11 3.2 Summary of Area Selection Process 11 3.3 Detailed Technical Assessment 13 3.4 Summary 18 4.0 Economic Feasibility 19 4.1 Introduction 19 4.2 Methodology 19 4.3 Levelised Cost of Electricity 21 4.4 Feasibility assessment 27 4.5 Cost Sensitivity 30 5.0 Risk Assessment 35 6.0 Role of Government 40 6.1 Introduction 40 6.2 Economic Benefits 40 6.3 Types of Assistance 43 6.4 Summary 49 7.0 References 51 Appendix A A Area selection process A Appendix B B Detailed factor assessment B Appendix C C Solar technology characteristics C Appendix D D Transmission components D Appendix E E Direct Normal Radiation E Appendix F F Technology and area matrices F 17 December 2010 At a Glance Pre-Feasibility Study for a Solar Power Precinct Final report Pre-Feasibility Study for a Solar Power Precinct a’ emissions to 60% below 2000 levels by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing to Integrate Europe & Ensure Security of Supply PE
    11/20/2014 Public enterprise "Electric power industry of Serbia" Europe‘s 8th energy region: Investing to integrate Europe & ensure security of supply Brussels, 19th November 2014 PE EPS is nearly a sole player in the Serbian electricity market Hydro power 2,835 MW plants Thermal power 5,171 MW* 3,936 MW** plants Combined heat and power 353 MW plants Total 8,359 MW* 7,124 MW** Electricity 37.5 TWh** Production Number of 3.5 mil ** customers Number of 33,335** employees Last power plant built in 1991. *With K&M ** Without K&M, end of 2013 As of June 1999 PE EPS does not operate its Kosovo and Metohija capacities (K&M) 2 1 11/20/2014 EPS facing 1200MW capacity decommissioning until 2025 Due to aging fleet and strict EU environmental regulations1 Net available EPS generation capacity, MW Successful negotiation about 8,000 -1,218 MW LCPD and IED implementation 20 eased the timing of lignite 7,239 25 111 decommissioning 208 210 630 100 6,021 6,000 20 25 280 Old gas-fired CHP capacity decommissioning 612 • Current Novi Sad gas/oil CHP (210 MW) and EPS small HPPs 1,200 Zrenjanin gas/oil CHP (111 MW) to terminate CHP SREMSKA MITROVICA - 321 MW 1,230 production CHP ZRENJANIN 4,000 CHP NOVI SAD 1,560 TPP MORAVA Old lignite-fired capacity decommissioning 1,239 (capacities to be closed in 2023 latest and to operate TPP KOLUBARA 211 20ths hours in total between 2018-20231) 211 TPP KOSTOLAC B TPP KOSTOLAC A 1,126 • Kolubara A1-3, A5 (208 MW) 1,126 2,000 • Nikola Tesla A1-2 (360 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA B • Kostolac A1-2 (280 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA A HPP
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Plan
    CORRIDOR INFORMATION DOCUMENT Implementation Plan TT 2021/2022 0 Version Control Version Summary Date Draft GA Approval 07.10.2019. Final ExBo Approval 13.01.2020. 1 Table of Content 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 3 2. Corridor Description ...................................................................................... 8 2.1. Key Parameters of Corridor Lines ............................................................... 9 2.2. Corridor Terminals .................................................................................... 32 2.3. Bottlenecks ............................................................................................... 35 2.4. AWB RFC Governance ............................................................................. 40 3. Market Analysis Study ................................................................................ 49 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 49 3.2. Objective of Transport Market Study ........................................................ 50 3.3. Methodology of TMS preparation .............................................................. 50 3.4. Analysis of transport and traffic indicators ................................................ 84 3.5. AWB RFC – Rail transport analysis .......................................................... 98 3.6. Rail Carrier demands .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Lignite Exit in Bulgaria, Romania and Greece
    Accelerated lignite exit in Bulgaria, Romania and Greece May 2020 Report: Accelerated lignite exit in Bulgaria, Romania and Greece Authors: REKK: Dr. László Szabó, Dr. András Mezősi, Enikő Kácsor (chapters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) TU Wien: Dr. Gustav Resch, Lukas Liebmann (chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5) CSD: Martin Vladimirov, Dr. Todor Galev, Dr. Radostina Primova (chapter 3) EPG: Dr. Radu Dudău, Mihnea Cătuți, Andrei Covatariu, Dr. Mihai Bălan (chapter 5) FACETS: Dr. Dimitri Lalas, Nikos Gakis (chapter 4) External Experts: Csaba Vaszkó, Alexandru Mustață (chapters 2.4, 3.2, 4.2 and 5.2) 2 The Regional Centre for Energy Policy Research (REKK) is a Budapest based think tank. The aim of REKK is to provide professional analysis and advice on networked energy markets that are both commercially and environmentally sustainable. REKK has performed comprehensive research, consulting and teaching activities in the fields of electricity, gas and carbon-dioxide markets since 2004, with analyses ranging from the impact assessments of regulatory measures to the preparation of individual companies' investment decisions. The Energy Economics Group (EEG), part of the Institute of Energy Systems and Electrical Drives at the Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), conducts research in the core areas of renewable energy, energy modelling, sustainable energy systems, and energy markets. EEG has managed and carried out many international as well as national research projects funded by the European Commission, national governments, public and private clients in several fields of research, especially focusing on renewable- and new energy systems. EEG is based in Vienna and was originally founded as research institute at TU Wien.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying CO2 Abatement Costs in Serbian Power Sector in 2014
    Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014. [Document Subtitle] Aleksandar Macura RES Foundation T: +381 (0)11 218 8897 Matični broj: 28828357 Zmaja od Noćaja T: +381 (0)11 2910362 PIB: 108822050 3a www.resfoundation.org Račun broj: 11000 Beograd 275001022539489576 Table of Contents TABLE OF TABLES 2 TABLE OF FIGURES 3 1 DISCLAIMER 5 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 7 4 BASIC PLANT DATA- 2014 12 5 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014. 13 6 ELECTRICITY AND COAL BALANCES 14 6.1 ELECTRICITY BALANCES 14 6.1.1 ELECTRICITY IMPORTS AND EXPORTS DATA AND EXPLANATIONS 15 6.2 COAL BALANCES 17 7 CO2 BALANCES 18 7.1 GHG EMISSIONS IN SERBIA 18 7.2 AVOIDED EMISSIONS IN 2014 19 8 POWER SECTOR FINANCIAL DATA 19 9 CALCULATION OF ABATEMENT COSTS 22 9.1 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 22 9.1.1 ADDITIONAL NET IMPORT COSTS 25 9.1.2 AVOIDED ELECTRICITY PURCHASES 26 9.1.3 LOST PROFIT 28 9.2 RESULTS 29 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1 EPS NET OUTPUT PLANT CAPACITY (MW). SOURCE: EPS .......................................................... 12 TABLE 2 2014. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION OF EPS POWER PLANTS. SOURCE: EPS ........................ 12 TABLE 3 ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. .............. 14 TABLE 4 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. ........... 15 TABLE 5 ELECTRICITY EXPORTS AND IMPORTS IN SERBIA. SOURCE: STATISTICAL OFFICE ...... 16 TABLE 6 NET ELECTRICITY IMPORTS . SOURCES: STATISTICAL OFFICE (RZS), REGULATORY ENERGY AGENCY (AERS), ELECTRICAL UTILITY (EPS), TRANSMISSION UTILITY (EMS) .... 17 TABLE 7 COAL BALANCES IN THE YEARS 2008-2014. .................................................................................... 17 2 Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Impact Assessment in the Context of the Brazilian Environmental and Energy Planning
    LARGE-SCALE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BRAZILIAN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY PLANNING Gardenio Diogo Pimentel da Silva Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Planejamento Energético, COPPE, da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, como parte dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do título de Mestre em Planejamento Energético. Orientador(es): David Alves Castelo Branco Alessandra Magrini Rio de Janeiro Feverreiro de 2019 LARGE-SCALE SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BRAZILIAN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY PLANNING Gardenio Diogo Pimentel da Silva DISSERTAÇÃO SUBMETIDA AO CORPO DOCENTE DO INSTITUTO ALBERTO LUIZ COIMBRA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA DE ENGENHARIA (COPPE) DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO COMO PARTE DOS REQUISITOS NECESSÁRIOS PARA A OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE MESTRE EM CIÊNCIAS EM PLANEJAMENTO ENERGÉTICO. Examinada por: ________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. David Alves Castelo Branco, DSc. ________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Alessandra Magrini, DSc. ________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Betina Susanne Hoffmann, DSc. ________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Ricardo Abranches Felix Cardoso Júnior, DSc. RIO DE JANEIRO, RJ - BRASIL FEVERREIRO DE 2019 Da Silva, Gardenio Diogo Pimentel Large-scale solar photovoltaic impact assessment in the context of the Brazilian environmental and energy planning/ Gardenio Diogo Pimentel da Silva. XIV, 89 p.: il.; 29,7 cm. Orientador: David Alves Castelo Branco e Alessandra Magrini Dissertação (mestrado) – UFRJ/ COPPE/ Programa de Planejamento Energético, 2019. Referências Bibliográficas: p. 92-96. 1. 1. Environmental Impact Assessment. 2. Regulation and energy planning. 3. Multicriteria decision-making analysis. I. Branco, David Alves Castelo; Magrini, Alessandra. II. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Programa de Engenharia Civil.
    [Show full text]
  • Security of Supply I: Generation Adequacy in Serbia And
    SecuritySecurity ofof supplysupply I:I: GenerationGeneration adequacyadequacy inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE Harrisburg, 31 March 2008 1 MainMain PurposePurpose ofof thethe presentationpresentation z Describe elements for Generation Adequacy in Serbia and SEE z How to fulfill requests for Security of supply z Generation capacity production forecast 2 ContentsContents z ObjectivesObjectives andand overviewoverview ofof powerpower systemsystem planningplanning inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE z ComplianceCompliance withwith EUEU legislationlegislation z ForecastingForecasting electricityelectricity demanddemand (annual,(annual, varying,varying, peak)peak) z CapacityCapacity mechanismsmechanisms toto stabilizestabilize thethe generationgeneration volumesvolumes z PowerPower productionproduction capacitycapacity reportingreporting byby generators,generators, interfaceinterface withwith thethe transmissiontransmission gridgrid z GenerationGeneration plantplant availabilityavailability (scheduled(scheduled maintenance,maintenance, forcedforced outages)outages) o BasicBasic modelingmodeling approachesapproaches o SpecialSpecial modelingmodeling forfor variablevariable (wind)(wind) generationgeneration o ProcessProcess ofof commissioningcommissioning newnew generationgeneration capacitycapacity 3 ObjectivesObjectives andand overviewoverview ofof powerpower systemsystem planningplanning inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE 4 SEESEE GeneratingGenerating SourcesSources -- 20052005 5 SEESEE PeakPeak demanddemand andand sources:sources: 20052005--20202020
    [Show full text]
  • LARGE HOSPITALS in BULGARIA *The Abbreviations UMBAL
    LARGE HOSPITALS IN BULGARIA *The abbreviations UMBAL/ УМБАЛ and MBAL/ МБАЛ in Bulgarian stand for “(University) Multi- profiled hospital for active medical treatment”, and usually signify the largest municipal or state hospital in the city/ region. UMBALSM/ УМБАЛСМ includes also an emergency ward. **The abbreviation DKC/ ДКЦ in Bulgarian stands for “Center for diagnostics and consultations” CITY HOSPITAL CONTACTS State Emergency Medical Tel.: +359 73 886 954 BLAGOEVGRAD Service – 24/7 21, Bratya Miladinovi Str. https://www.csmp-bl.com/ Tel.: +359 73 8292329 60, Slavyanska Str. MBAL Blagoevgrad http://mbalblagoevgrad.com/ Tel.: +359 73 882 020 Puls Private Hospital 62, Slavyanska Str. http://bolnicapuls.com Tel.: *7070 UMBAL Burgas 9, Zornitsa Str. BURGAS http://mbalburgas.com/ Emergency: +359 890 122 150 Meden Rudnik area, Zone A MBAL Burgasmed https://hospitalburgasmed.bg/ Emergency: +359 56 845 083 13, Vazrazhdane Str. Location: N 42 29' 40,54" St. Sofia Medical Center E 27 28' 24,40" http://www.saintsofia.com/ Tel.:+359 391 64024 29, Hristo Botev Blvd. DIMITROVGRAD MBAL Sveta Ekaterina https://www.mbalstekaterina.eu/ Tel.: +359 58 600 723 24, Panayot Hitov Str. DOBRICH MBAL Dobrich http://www.mbal-dobrich.com/ Tel.: +359 66 800 243 MBAL Dr. Tota Venkova 1, Doctor Iliev-Detskia street GABROVO Gabrovo https://www.mbalgabrovo.com/ Tel.: +359 41862373; +359 889522041 GALABOVO MBAL Galabovo 10, Aleko Konstantinov Str. Tel.: +359 66 876 424 Apogei Angelov&Co Medical 1, Ivaylo street Center Tel.: +359 751 95 114 54, Stara Planina Str. GOTSE DELCHEV MBAL Ivan Skenderov http://mbal-gocedelchev.com/ Tel.: +359 38 606 700 49, Saedinenie Blvd.
    [Show full text]