Boom and Bust TRACKING the GLOBAL COAL PLANT PIPELINE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boom and Bust TRACKING the GLOBAL COAL PLANT PIPELINE Boom and Bust TRACKING THE GLOBAL COAL PLANT PIPELINE Christine Shearer, Nicole Ghio, Lauri Myllyvirta, and Ted Nace BOOM AND BUST ABOUT COALSWARM AUTHORS CoalSwarm, a project of Earth Island This report was prepared by Christine Shearer, Nicole Institute, is a network of researchers Ghio, Lauri Myllyvirta and Ted Nace. Christine Shearer seeking to develop collaborative infor- is Program Director of CoalSwarm. Nicole Ghio is a mational resources on coal impacts and alternatives. campaign representative for Sierra Club’s International Current projects include identifying and mapping pro- Climate Program. Lauri Myllyvirta is Senior Global posed and existing coal projects worldwide, including Campaigner, Coal and Air Pollution, at Greenpeace. plants, mines, and infrastructure. www.coalswarm.org. Ted Nace is Executive Director of CoalSwarm. ABOUT THE SIERRA CLUB ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Sierra Club is America’s largest and The following people provided helpful feedback most influential grassroots environ- on drafts of the report: Tim Buckley (IEEFA), Bob mental organization, with more than Burton (CoalSwarm), Ashish Fernandes (Greenpeace), 2.4 million members and supporters. Aviva Imhof (The Sunrise Project), Mark Kresowik In addition to helping people from all backgrounds (Sierra Club), Michael Lazarus (Stockholm Environ- explore nature and our outdoor heritage, the Sierra ment Institute), Sherri Liang (Sierra Club), and Club works to promote clean energy, safeguard the Aiqun Yu (CoalSwarm). health of our communities, protect wildlife, and pre- serve our remaining wild places through grassroots The report was designed by Charlene Will. Page layout activism, public education, lobbying, and legal action. was by David Van Ness. For more information, visit www.sierraclub.org. PERMISSIONS/COPYRIGHT ABOUT THE GLOBAL COAL PLANT TRACKER This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit The Global Coal Plant Tracker identifies, maps, purposes without special permission from the copy- describes, and categorizes every known coal-fired right holders, provided that acknowledgement of the generating unit proposed since January 1, 2010. Devel- source is made. No use of this publication may be oped by the research group CoalSwarm, the tracker made for resale or other commercial purpose without uses public sources to document each plant and is the written permission of the copyright holders. designed to support longitudinal monitoring. The fol- lowing people participated in plant-by-plant research: Copyright © March 2015 Elena Bixel, Bob Burton, Gregor Clark, Joshua Frank, by CoalSwarm and Sierra Club Ted Nace, Christine Shearer, Adrian Wilson, and Aiqun Yu. Additional wiki editing and fact checking was provided by Christine Law, Iris Shearer, Austin Woerner, and Yvette Zhu. The tracker architect and project manager was Ted Nace. Web/GIS programming was done by Tom Allnutt and Gregor Allensworth of GreenInfo Network, with support from Tim Sinnott of GreenInfo Network. COALSWARM / SIERRA CLUB REPORT | MARCH 2015 | 2 Boom and Bust TRACKING THE GLOBAL COAL PLANT PIPELINE Christine Shearer, Nicole Ghio, Lauri Myllyvirta, and Ted Nace for every plant completed. In Europe, South EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Asia, Latin America, and Africa, the failure-to- From 2005 to 2012, worldwide coal-fired generating completion rate is 4:1 or higher. The amount of capacity boomed, growing at three times the previous new coal-fired generating capacity in the proposal pace. The increase in the global coal fleet was twice pipeline worldwide dropped from 1,401 GW in the size of the entire existing U.S. coal fleet. That 2012 to 1,080 GW in 2014, a 23 percent decline. boom is now busting. In India, projects shelved or ■■ The proposed coal plant pipeline remains highly cancelled since 2012 outnumber project completions dangerous. Even if the trend of two coal plant by six to one, and new construction initiations are at a proposals halted for every one plant built contin- near-standstill. In both Europe and the U.S., the coal ues, the remaining one-third will use up nearly fleet is shrinking, with retirements outnumbering all of the available carbon budget for avoiding the new plants. China faces a looming glut in coal-fired internationally recognized 2°C warming thresh- generating capacity, with plant utilization rates at a old. Stronger efforts are needed to curb new coal 35-year low. capacity. Bad news for coal builders is good news for the ■■ China faces a capacity glut. In 2014, China climate and public health. Because coal is the most recorded a 1.6 percent decline in power genera- carbon-intensive fossil fuel and coal plants have a long tion from coal, and the overall utilization rate for lifespan, growth in coal capacity has major implica- thermal plants declined to 54 percent, the lowest tions for climate stability. In addition to its effect on level in over three decades. Although coal capac- climate, pollution from coal combustion is responsible ity additions fell by half from 2006 to 2014, China for an estimated 800,000 premature deaths each year. needs to cancel more proposed coal plants to avoid This report provides the results of a worldwide survey large amounts of stranded or underutilized coal- completed in January 2015 by the Global Coal Plant fired capacity. Tracker. It includes the following conclusions: ■■ India’s coal boom has withered. Grassroots citizen ■■ Boom is turning to bust. After a period of extraor- opposition, coal supply issues, and other prob- dinary growth, worldwide coal plant construction lems have caused financing for new coal plants to has slowed rapidly due to increasingly effective dry up. Although 69 GW of capacity is still under citizen opposition, competition from renewables, construction due to a surge in construction starts and economic restructuring. Since 2010, two prior to 2012, less than 10 GW of new construc- plants have been shelved or cancelled worldwide tion has started since mid-2012. For every project COALSWARM / SIERRA CLUB REPORT | MARCH 2015 | 3 BOOM AND BUST completed in India since mid-2012, six projects have been shelved or cancelled. Nevertheless, approximately 300 GW of capacity remains in plan- ning, a potentially dangerous carbon bomb. ■■ In the United States and the European Union, coal capacity continues a long-term decline. From 2003 to 2014, the amount of coal-fired generating capacity retired in the US and the EU exceeded new capacity by 22 percent. With most new capacity plans halted and large amounts of capacity slated for retirement, reductions in coal capacity are expected to accelerate. ■■ Some countries are defying the slowdown. Con- centrations of proposed new coal-fired generating capacity can still be found in Turkey, Vietnam, Indonesia, Poland, and the Balkans. The Global Coal Plant Tracker identifies, maps, describes, and categorizes every known coal-fired generating unit proposed since January 1, 2010. Devel- oped by the research group CoalSwarm, the tracker uses public sources to document each plant and is designed to support longitudinal monitoring. COALSWARM / SIERRA CLUB REPORT | MARCH 2015 | 4 PART I GLOBAL RESULTS In addition to greenhouse gases, fine particle pollu- INTRODUCTION tion from coal causes an estimated 800,000 premature 1 Carbon dioxide emissions from coal are the largest deaths annually. Valuations of climate and health contributor to global climate change. From 2004 to effects, along with other external costs such as water 2013, increased coal utilization outweighed all other pollution, agricultural losses, and damage to natural sources combined, producing 62 percent of global ecosystems, place the actual cost of coal-fired electric- carbon dioxide emissions growth from fossil fuels ity generation to society at two to four times market and cement (Global Carbon Project 2014). Due to the price (Epstein 2011, Auffhammer 2011, Muller et al. long lifespan of coal plants, typically 40 years or more, 2011, Shindell 2015). The economic damage from one large coal capacity additions represent a particularly tonne of CO2 emissions has recently been estimated serious threat to climate stability. at US$242 (Moore and Diaz 2015); a typical coal plant 2 generates about 4.4 million tonnes of CO2 per year. Figure 1. Worldwide Coal-Fired Generation Net Capacity Additions, 1980–1993 Source: Platts WEPP January 2015 and CoalSwarm analysis 1. China: 670,000 premature deaths annually (Abrams 2014); India: 80,000–115,000 (Goenka and Guttikunda 2013); United States: 13,200 (Schneider and Banks 2010); European Union plus Serbia, Croatia, and Turkey: 23,300 (Jensen 2013). 2. Assumes 1000 MW, 58% capacity factor, supercritical combustion (9080 Btu/kWh), subbituminous coal (211.9 pounds of carbon dioxide per million Btu). COALSWARM / SIERRA CLUB REPORT | MARCH 2015 | 5 BOOM AND BUST Figure 2. Comparison of Global Coal-Fired 52 citizen groups. The tracker pools data on proposed Generating Capacity Increase to U.S. coal plants worldwide, providing detailed information Coal-Fired Generating Capacity in map and tabular form for 3,900 generating units in the developmental pipeline since January 1, 2010.3 Each project is linked to a footnoted wiki page curated by CoalSwarm. This report summarizes the findings of the tracker. Appendix A explains the tracker architecture and methodology. Appendix B shows national totals for existing coal capacity worldwide. Appendix C provides a full list of proposed coal projects by country and links each project to a wiki page
Recommended publications
  • The Case of Kusile FINAL
    THE EXTERNAL COST OF COAL -FIRED POWER GENERATION: The case of Kusile Prepared by: • Business Enterprises at University of Pretoria (Pty(Pty)) LLtLtdtdd Prepared for: • Greenpeace Africa and Greenpeace International DATE: 29 September 2011 PO Box 14679 Hatfield 0028 University of Pretoria Main Campus, Prospect Street, Hatfield, Graduate Centre, Ground Floor, Entrance 1.82 T: +27 (12) 420 4245 F: +27 (12) 362 5270 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 5 2. Background, problem statement and study limitations 7 3. The externality cost of coal-fired power generation: a sectoral overview 9 3.1 Health 9 3.2 Climate change 11 3.3 Water 13 3.4 Mining 15 4. Results 17 5. Conclusion 19 6. References 21 NOTE: For access to the annexes listed below, please refer to the Greenpeace Africa website: www.greenpeaceafrica.org Annex 0 (Background): Coal and coal-fired power generation in South Africa Annex 1: The health costs of coal-fired power generation in South Africa Annex 2: Climate change: the opportunity cost of Medupi and Kusile power stations Annex 3: Estimating the opportunity cost of water for the Kusile and Medupi coal-fired electricity power plants in South Africa Annex 4: The external costs of coal mining: the case of collieries supplying Kusile power station ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge comments provided by the Greenpeace Africa and Greenpeace International review teams, and by four workshop panellists, Prof Jane Olwoch, Prof Kuku Voyi, Prof Ban Farrell and Mr Meiring du Plessis. This research was financially supported
    [Show full text]
  • Construction First in Portable Sanitation
    Construction First in Portable Sanitation Sanitech is the leading portable sanitation company in South Africa with branches nationwide and is renowned for its service excellence and superior product technology. Sanitech was the first portable toilet hire company to supply sanitation facilities to areas where no sanitation infrastructure existed. Experience counts and Sanitech understands the importance of choosing a trusted supplier with an outstanding track record. With more than two decades of local experience and the global support of Waco International, Sanitech is the only toilet hire company with the necessary national fleet to maintain a competitive edge. Fast and Efficient Site Solutions Sanitech currently provides ablution facilities to a substantial number of construction and industrial projects throughout the country, improving both the hygiene standards and productivity on these sites. Their services include: • Supply of fresh, clean water to the units • On-site toilet cleaning and servicing to agreed timescales • Short and long term rental of portable toilets and mobile • Replenishment of toilet rolls and soap and paper hand towels ablution units Current industry projects include: • Braamhoek Dam • Glencore Mines • Aveng Mine • Avon Power Station • Anglo Mines • Xstrata Mine • Thukela Water Project • Impumelelo Mine • Shiva Uranium • Cornubia Development • Shondoni Mine • Sasol Sigma Mine • Dube Tradeport • Total Coal Mine • Sasol Wax Phase 1 & 2 • Kouga Wind Farm • Kusile Power Station • Matlosana Mall • Dedisa Power Plant Special Projects • Sibanye Mine Construction • Sasol Synfuels • Wescoal Mine • Lethabo Power Station • PetroSA Orca Rig • Stefanutti Stocks Mine • R377 Road Construction Comprehensive Health and Safety Programme Sanitech’s world-class SHE management system is driven by Waco International Corporate Standards and helps to meet health and safety responsibilities by protecting their most valuable resources – employees, customers, communities and the environment that sustains us all.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing to Integrate Europe & Ensure Security of Supply PE
    11/20/2014 Public enterprise "Electric power industry of Serbia" Europe‘s 8th energy region: Investing to integrate Europe & ensure security of supply Brussels, 19th November 2014 PE EPS is nearly a sole player in the Serbian electricity market Hydro power 2,835 MW plants Thermal power 5,171 MW* 3,936 MW** plants Combined heat and power 353 MW plants Total 8,359 MW* 7,124 MW** Electricity 37.5 TWh** Production Number of 3.5 mil ** customers Number of 33,335** employees Last power plant built in 1991. *With K&M ** Without K&M, end of 2013 As of June 1999 PE EPS does not operate its Kosovo and Metohija capacities (K&M) 2 1 11/20/2014 EPS facing 1200MW capacity decommissioning until 2025 Due to aging fleet and strict EU environmental regulations1 Net available EPS generation capacity, MW Successful negotiation about 8,000 -1,218 MW LCPD and IED implementation 20 eased the timing of lignite 7,239 25 111 decommissioning 208 210 630 100 6,021 6,000 20 25 280 Old gas-fired CHP capacity decommissioning 612 • Current Novi Sad gas/oil CHP (210 MW) and EPS small HPPs 1,200 Zrenjanin gas/oil CHP (111 MW) to terminate CHP SREMSKA MITROVICA - 321 MW 1,230 production CHP ZRENJANIN 4,000 CHP NOVI SAD 1,560 TPP MORAVA Old lignite-fired capacity decommissioning 1,239 (capacities to be closed in 2023 latest and to operate TPP KOLUBARA 211 20ths hours in total between 2018-20231) 211 TPP KOSTOLAC B TPP KOSTOLAC A 1,126 • Kolubara A1-3, A5 (208 MW) 1,126 2,000 • Nikola Tesla A1-2 (360 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA B • Kostolac A1-2 (280 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA A HPP
    [Show full text]
  • Fenhe (Fen He)
    China ―10 Fenhe (Fen He) Map of River Table of Basic Data Name(s): Fenhe (in Huanghe River) Serial No. : China-10 Location: Shanxi Province, Northern China N 35° 34' ~ 38° 53' E 110° 34' ~ 111° 58' Area: 39,471 km2 Length of the main stream: 694 km Origin: Mt. Guancen (2,147 m) Highest point: Mt.Woyangchang (2,603 m) Outlet: Huanghe Lowest point: 365 (m) Main geological features: Hard layered clastic rocks, Group of hard massive metamorphic rocks Main tributaries: Lanhe (1,146 km2), Xiaohe (3,894 km2), Changyuanhe (2,274 km2), Wenyuhe (3,979 km2), Honganjiandong (1,123 km2), Huihe (2,060 km2) Main lakes: ------------ 6 3 6 3 Main reservoirs: Fenhe (723×10 m , 1961), Wenyuhe (105×10 m , 1970), Fenhe II (under construction) Mean annual precipitation: 493.2 mm (1971 ~ 1990) (basin average) Mean annual runoff: 48.7 m3/s at Hejin (38,728 km2) (1971 ~ 1990) Population: 3,410,700 (1998) Main cities: Taiyuan, Linfen, Yuci, Houma Land use: Forest (24%), Rice paddy (2%), Other agriculture (29%), Water surface (2%),Urban (6%), Uncultivated land (20%), Qthers (17%) 3 China ―10 1. General Description The Fenhe is a main tributary of The Yellow River. It is located in the middle of Shanxi province. The main river originates from northwest of Mt. Guanqing and flows from north to south before joining the Yellow River at Wanrong county. It flows through 18 counties and cities, including Ningwu, Jinle, Loufan, Gujiao, and Taiyuan. The catchment area is 39,472 km2 and the main channel length is 693 km.
    [Show full text]
  • OIL COUNCIL Exploration Director, WORLD ASSEMBLY Tullow Oil
    Oil & Gas Company Executives Register Today for only £1,995! Special Industry Delegation Discounts Also Available! 70 renowed speakers including: Angus McCoss OIL COUNCIL Exploration Director, WORLD ASSEMBLY Tullow Oil The World’s Premier Meeting Ashley Heppenstall President and CEO, Point for Energy, Finance Lundin Petroleum and Investment Charles ‘Chuck’ Davidson Chairman and CEO, Noble Energy John Knight EVP, Global Strategy and Business Development, Statoil Dr Mike Watts Deputy CEO, 26 – 27 November 2012 Cairn Energy Old Billingsgate, London, UK Ian Henderson Senior Advisor, J.P Morgan Asset Management • Europe’s largest O&G business meeting with 1,200 senior executives • Global participation from international O&G companies, investors and financiers • Delegations attending from NOCs, IOCs, small-cap, mid-cap and large cap independents • Direct access to energy focussed debt providers, equity capital, private equity Ian Taylor and strategic investors President and CEO, • Focuses on E&P funding, corporate development strategies, joint ventures, Vitol Group deepwater, the future of the North Sea and NCS, the new MENA landscape and the new regulatory environment Julian Metherell Lead Partners: CFO, Genel Energy Ronald Pantin CEO, Pacific Rubiales Partners: PR OG RE SS IV E Toronto Stock TSX Venture Toronto Stock TSX Venture Toronto Stock TSX Venture Exchange Exchange Exchange Exchange Exchange Exchange Bourse de Bourse de Bourse de Bourse de Bourse de Bourse de www.oilcouncil.com/event/wecaToronto Croissance TSX Toronto Croissance TSX
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Coal Mining on Karst Water System in North China
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 3 ( 2011 ) 293 – 302 2011 Xican International Conference on Fine Geological Exploration and Groundwater & Gas Hazards Control in Coal Mines Impact of Coal Mining on Karst Water System in North China Xiangqing Fang*, Yaojun Fu Hydrogeology Bureau of China Nat ion al Administration of Coal Geology, Handan 056004, China Abstract Based on a large number of data, the paper analysed the influence factors of coal mining for the karst water system in north China, used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for evaluation of the effect of coal mining on the karst water system, and divided influence degree subareas of State-planed 21 coal mining areas. We also come up with some suggestions on prevention and control measures of principle according to the different influence degrees. ©© 20112011 Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd. Selection Selection and and/or peer-review peer-review under under responsibility responsibility of China of Xi’an Coal Research Society Institute of China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Corp Keywords: karst-water system in north China, influence degree, prevention and control measures; North China type coalfield and the karst water system in the north are inseparable, there exists three superposition relationships [1]: monoclinal structure, synclinal structure and block-faulting structure. Karst water system in the north is characterized by large scales, numerous components of water resources, the complexity of transformation between water resources, coexistence of water and coal and so on. The karst water resource in the north is not only important water resource, but also is threatening the coal resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 468 Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities - Philosophy of Being Human as the Core of Interdisciplinary Research (ICCESSH 2020) The Impact of Resilience on the Psychological Health of Disadvantaged Children: The Mediating Role of Coping Styles and Core Self-Evaluation Chenxi Li1,* Chao Ma1,2 Haidong Zhu1 Chao Song3 Zhijiang Liang1 Jinli Wei4 1Normal College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832003, China 2Centre for Applied Psychological Research, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China 3Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 4Third Division 44 Regiment Middle School, Tumxuk, Xinjiang, China *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Objective: Based on the environment-individual interaction model and the "evaluation-coping" theory, the relationship between Resilience, Coping Styles, Core Self-evaluation and psychological health of disadvantaged children was explored to provide some theoretical support for psychological health intervention research. Methods: Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescent (RSCA), core self-evaluation Scale (CSES), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) were used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 618 middle school students in South Xinjiang. Results: First, GHQ-12 scores were negatively correlated with RSCA, CSES, and SCSQ scores (r=- 0.57/r=-0.56/r=-0.49, P <0.001), and positively correlated with the level of psychological health; second, coping styles is a mediator between resilience and psychological health (mediator effect value is -0.04); third, core self-evaluation is a mediator between coping styles and psychological health, there is "resilience — coping styles — core self-evaluation — psychological health" path. Conclusion: Resilience can directly predict the psychological health of disadvantaged children, and indirectly predict psychological health level through chain mediation of coping styles — core self-evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • BILLING CODE 3510-33-P DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security 15 CFR Part 744 [Docket No. 190925-0044] RIN 0694
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/09/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-22210, and on govinfo.gov BILLING CODE 3510-33-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security 15 CFR Part 744 [Docket No. 190925-0044] RIN 0694-AH68 Addition of Certain Entities to the Entity List AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce ACTION: Final rule. 1 SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding twenty-eight entities to the Entity List. These twenty-eight entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the foreign policy interests of the United States and will be listed on the Entity List under the destination of the People’s Republic of China (China). DATE: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, End-User Review Committee, Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991, Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Entity List (15 CFR, Subchapter C, part 744, Supplement No. 4) identifies entities reasonably believed to be involved, or to pose a significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR parts 730-774) impose additional license requirements on, and limits the availability of most license exceptions for, exports, reexports, and transfers (in country) to listed entities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 International Religious Freedom Report
    CHINA (INCLUDES TIBET, XINJIANG, HONG KONG, AND MACAU) 2019 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary Reports on Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet, and Xinjiang are appended at the end of this report. The constitution, which cites the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and the guidance of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, states that citizens have freedom of religious belief but limits protections for religious practice to “normal religious activities” and does not define “normal.” Despite Chairman Xi Jinping’s decree that all members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) must be “unyielding Marxist atheists,” the government continued to exercise control over religion and restrict the activities and personal freedom of religious adherents that it perceived as threatening state or CCP interests, according to religious groups, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and international media reports. The government recognizes five official religions – Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism. Only religious groups belonging to the five state- sanctioned “patriotic religious associations” representing these religions are permitted to register with the government and officially permitted to hold worship services. There continued to be reports of deaths in custody and that the government tortured, physically abused, arrested, detained, sentenced to prison, subjected to forced indoctrination in CCP ideology, or harassed adherents of both registered and unregistered religious groups for activities related to their religious beliefs and practices. There were several reports of individuals committing suicide in detention, or, according to sources, as a result of being threatened and surveilled. In December Pastor Wang Yi was tried in secret and sentenced to nine years in prison by a court in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, in connection to his peaceful advocacy for religious freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Boards Fall Behind in the Drive to Appoint Women Alex Spence: the Times February 6 2012
    Boards fall behind in the drive to appoint women Alex Spence: The Times February 6 2012 Britain's biggest companies will miss a deadline to have a quarter of their boardroom positions filled by women unless more is done to move talented female executives up the corporate ladder, recruiters have warned. As things stand, the target of having 25 per cent of FTSE 100 directorships held by women will be met two years late, in 2017, the search firm Norman Broadbent said. Although the female composition of FTSE 100 boards has risen from 13.6 per cent at the start of last year to almost 15 per cent, the supply of women executives and senior managers remained limited, it said. According to Neil Holmes, a consultant at Norman Broadbent: "Women are appearing on short-lists but the supply on the executive side is still lower than it should be and this requires companies to invest in long-term cultural changes." In a report last year, Lord Davies of Abersoch challenged corporate leaders to cast the net wider in the search for directors and to break their dominance of their boardrooms. Twenty-six per cent of the non-executive directors appointed to FTSE 100 boards last year were women, with 24 per cent in the FTSE 250 and 17 per cent in smaller listed companies. Women still lagged well behind their male counterparts in the top executive jobs at the biggest companies, accounting for 9 per cent of FTSE 100 executive positions last year, Norman Broadbent said. There was also a vast disparity between different industries, with women making up 17 per cent of boards in the health sector at the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012
    Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012 Production team: Iain MacLeay Kevin Harris Anwar Annut and chapter authors A National Statistics publication London: TSO © Crown Copyright 2012 All rights reserved First published 2012 ISBN 9780115155284 Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to Kevin Harris, at the address given in paragraph XXIX of the Introduction. The Department of Energy and Climate Change reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice. About TSO's Standing Order Service The Standing Order Service, open to all TSO account holders, allows customers to automatically receive the publications they require in a specified subject area, thereby saving them the time, trouble and expense of placing individual orders, also without handling charges normally incurred when placing ad-hoc orders. Customers may choose from over 4,000 classifications arranged in 250 sub groups under 30 major subject areas. These classifications enable customers to choose from a wide variety of subjects, those publications that are of special interest to them. This is a particularly valuable service for the specialist library or research body. All publications will be dispatched immediately after publication date. Write to TSO, Standing Order Department, PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN, quoting reference 12.01.013.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying CO2 Abatement Costs in Serbian Power Sector in 2014
    Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014. [Document Subtitle] Aleksandar Macura RES Foundation T: +381 (0)11 218 8897 Matični broj: 28828357 Zmaja od Noćaja T: +381 (0)11 2910362 PIB: 108822050 3a www.resfoundation.org Račun broj: 11000 Beograd 275001022539489576 Table of Contents TABLE OF TABLES 2 TABLE OF FIGURES 3 1 DISCLAIMER 5 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 7 4 BASIC PLANT DATA- 2014 12 5 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014. 13 6 ELECTRICITY AND COAL BALANCES 14 6.1 ELECTRICITY BALANCES 14 6.1.1 ELECTRICITY IMPORTS AND EXPORTS DATA AND EXPLANATIONS 15 6.2 COAL BALANCES 17 7 CO2 BALANCES 18 7.1 GHG EMISSIONS IN SERBIA 18 7.2 AVOIDED EMISSIONS IN 2014 19 8 POWER SECTOR FINANCIAL DATA 19 9 CALCULATION OF ABATEMENT COSTS 22 9.1 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 22 9.1.1 ADDITIONAL NET IMPORT COSTS 25 9.1.2 AVOIDED ELECTRICITY PURCHASES 26 9.1.3 LOST PROFIT 28 9.2 RESULTS 29 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1 EPS NET OUTPUT PLANT CAPACITY (MW). SOURCE: EPS .......................................................... 12 TABLE 2 2014. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION OF EPS POWER PLANTS. SOURCE: EPS ........................ 12 TABLE 3 ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. .............. 14 TABLE 4 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. ........... 15 TABLE 5 ELECTRICITY EXPORTS AND IMPORTS IN SERBIA. SOURCE: STATISTICAL OFFICE ...... 16 TABLE 6 NET ELECTRICITY IMPORTS . SOURCES: STATISTICAL OFFICE (RZS), REGULATORY ENERGY AGENCY (AERS), ELECTRICAL UTILITY (EPS), TRANSMISSION UTILITY (EMS) .... 17 TABLE 7 COAL BALANCES IN THE YEARS 2008-2014. .................................................................................... 17 2 Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014.
    [Show full text]