TALUKWISE Kodungallur Taluk Whether Sl
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Kodungallur DETAILS OF APPEAL (FLOOD – REBUILD) TALUKWISE Kodungallur Taluk Whether Sl. included in Reason for Appeal No. Village Name Details of Order No. IKM List rejection (Yes / No) Prema Thupran, Appeal allowed and 1 30/18 Ala Munnoottiparambil Yes changed to complete loss (H), 9846872526 (>75%) Jayanthi Chandran, Appeal allowed and 2 29/187 Ala Thundiparambil Yes changed to complete loss (H), 9846022140 (>75%) No damage found in Shahnanath 3 433/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Pokkakkillath originally assessed Appeal allowed and Sheena 4 436/18 Chendrapinny Yes percentage increased to Mannanthara 30 -59 No damage found in Chandramathi 5 432/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Sivaraman originally assessed No damage found in 6 429/18 Chendrapinny Asarath Kareem Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 7 427/18 Chendrapinny Suseela Padinjattayil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in Geehta 8 426/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Menothuparambil originally assessed No damage found in Sunilkumar 9 452/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Talappilly originally assessed No damage found in Prasad A B 10 449/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Adiparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and Pathumma 11 448/18 Chendrapinny Yes percentage increased to Chungassery 16 - 29 No damage found in Ramanathan 12 431/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Moothery originally assessed No damage found in 13 430/18 Edathiruthy Haseena Chenathu Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 14 450/18 Chendrapinny Devaki Narayanan Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 15 325/18 Edathiruthy Rukkiya Thoppiyil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and Rajendran 16 336/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Puthuparambil (>75%) No damage found in 17 445/18 Edathiruthy Chakki Ainikkattu Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Page 1 Kodungallur Appeal allowed and Sunilkumar 18 444/18 Edathiruthy Yes percentage increased Palappetty to 60 - 74 Appeal allowed and Sreenivasan 19 443/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Kanakkampurakkal (>75%) No damage found in Shaila Johny 20 463/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Chittilappilly originally assessed No damage found in Shailesh 21 372/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Velayudhan originally assessed No damage found in 22 365/18 Edathiruthy Dinesh Velayudhan Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 23 425/18 Chendrapinny Remani Chavuveettil Yes percentage increased to 16 - 29 No damage found in Nandini 24 447/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Ramakrishnan originally assessed No damage found in 25 441/18 Edathiruthy Babu T C Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Sahada Appeal allowed and 26 446/18 Edathiruthy Korattil,14/64, Yes changed to complete loss 9562226285 (>75%) No damage found in Omanakuttan 27 376/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Puthuveettil originally assessed No damage found in Bharathan 28 378/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalakudath originally assessed No damage found in 29 382/18 Edathiruthy Mohanan Parappully Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 30 421/18 Edathiruthy Shahida Jabbar Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 31 439/18 Edathiruthy Ambika Bahuleyan Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Valliyamma 32 442/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalakoodath originally assessed No damage found in Thanka 33 438/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Arakkaparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and 34 381/18 Edathiruthy Sarada Bhaskaran Yes changed to complete loss (>75%) Appeal allowed and Ammu 35 437/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Ramakrishnan (>75%) Appeal allowed and Santhosh 36 440/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Arakkaparambil (>75%) Page 2 Kodungallur Appeal allowed and 346/18, Saraswathy 37 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss 129773 Kanjiraparambil (>75%) No damage found in 213/18, 38 Methala Anil Mullassery Yes Appeal rejected excess of what 4496/18 originally assessed Appeal allowed and Krishnan 39 224/18 Lokamaleswaram Yes changed to complete loss Kochinadan (>75%) No damage found in 40 401/18 Pullut Rathi Valayil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and Kousalia 41 70/18 Perinjanam Yes changed to complete loss Kanakkassery (>75%) Appeal allowed and 42 344/18 Pappinivattom Balan Chennara Yes changed to complete loss (>75%) No damage found in Pavizham 43 237/18 Ala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Madathiparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and 44 435/18 Edathiruthy Vimala Erayil Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Unnikrishnan 45 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Palakkaparambil originally assessed No damage found in 46 112003/18 Methala Singh K P Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in Sunil 47 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thundiparambil originally assessed Appeal rejected and 48 112003/18 Methala Yamuna Prakasan Yes percentage decreased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and 49 112003/18 Methala Gopi Attasseri Yes percentage decreased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Sajan V K 50 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Valiyaparambil originally assessed Appeal rejected and Rathika 51 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Nelliparambath 16 - 29 No damage found in Madhu 52 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kannamparambil originally assessed No damage found in Chandrika 53 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Vadakkedath originally assessed No damage found in Neelambaran 54 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kuzhikkattu originally assessed No damage found in Indira 55 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Neduparambil originally assessed Page 3 Kodungallur No damage found in Kavitha 56 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalluparambil originally assessed No damage found in Kousalya 57 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Mananchery originally assessed No damage found in 58 112003/18 Methala Balan Valiparambil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Sathi No damage found in 59 112003/18 Methala Arayammattuparam Yes Appeal rejected excess of what bil originally assessed Appeal rejected and 60 112003/18 Methala Valsan Nadumuri Yes percentage decreased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Liju Sunil 61 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Thandasseril 16 - 29 Appeal allowed and 62 112003/18 Methala Vilasan Mullezhathu Yes percentage increased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Rema 63 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Kaimaparambil 15 No damage found in Subrahmanian 64 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Alakkal originally assessed No damage found in Saseendra 65 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thandasseri originally assessed Satan M L Appeal allowed and 66 112003/18 Methala Mullasseril Yes percentage increased to (Sulochana) 16 - 29 Peethambaran No damage found in 67 112003/18 Methala Thekkilakattil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what (Raman) originally assessed No damage found in Anilan 68 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kozhiparambil originally assessed No damage found in 69 112003/18 Methala Sarada Mullezhath Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal rejected and Rugmini 70 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Oliparambil 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Reshma 71 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Thambiparambil 15 No damage found in Anandan 72 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Plavungaparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and Sheela Manoj 73 112003/18 Perinjanam Yes changed to complete loss Munpuveettil (>75%) Appeal rejected & Michael P I, 74 3306/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Palaparambil (H) 15% Bava,Mathilakath Allowed & changed to 75 4212/18 Chendrappinni Yes (H) complete loss (>75%) Page 4 Kodungallur Mukundan (Bindu Allowed & changed to 76 4311/18 Methala Yes Syamkumar) complete loss (>75%) Sabitha, Appeal allowed & 77 3616/18 Panangad Yes Thottupurath (H) increased to 30-59% Appeal allowed & Aneesa, 78 3633/18 Pullut Yes percentage increased to Alamprambil (H) 30-59% No damage found in Remadevi, 79 4204/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Pazhooparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Mallika K R, 80 3971/18 Pullut Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Koroparambil (H) originally assessed Mohanan No damage found in 81 3972/18 Pullut (Pushpavathi) Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Nadumuri (H) originally assessed No damage found in 82 3975/15 Pullut Thara, Valthara (H) Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Kamalakshi K M No damage found in 83 3981/8 Methala (Kishore N V), Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Nedumparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Anthony Joseph, 84 4167/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kariyaparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Kousalya T K, 85 4182/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thottuparambil (H)