TALUKWISE Kodungallur Taluk Whether Sl

TALUKWISE Kodungallur Taluk Whether Sl

Kodungallur DETAILS OF APPEAL (FLOOD – REBUILD) TALUKWISE Kodungallur Taluk Whether Sl. included in Reason for Appeal No. Village Name Details of Order No. IKM List rejection (Yes / No) Prema Thupran, Appeal allowed and 1 30/18 Ala Munnoottiparambil Yes changed to complete loss (H), 9846872526 (>75%) Jayanthi Chandran, Appeal allowed and 2 29/187 Ala Thundiparambil Yes changed to complete loss (H), 9846022140 (>75%) No damage found in Shahnanath 3 433/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Pokkakkillath originally assessed Appeal allowed and Sheena 4 436/18 Chendrapinny Yes percentage increased to Mannanthara 30 -59 No damage found in Chandramathi 5 432/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Sivaraman originally assessed No damage found in 6 429/18 Chendrapinny Asarath Kareem Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 7 427/18 Chendrapinny Suseela Padinjattayil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in Geehta 8 426/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Menothuparambil originally assessed No damage found in Sunilkumar 9 452/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Talappilly originally assessed No damage found in Prasad A B 10 449/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Adiparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and Pathumma 11 448/18 Chendrapinny Yes percentage increased to Chungassery 16 - 29 No damage found in Ramanathan 12 431/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Moothery originally assessed No damage found in 13 430/18 Edathiruthy Haseena Chenathu Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 14 450/18 Chendrapinny Devaki Narayanan Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 15 325/18 Edathiruthy Rukkiya Thoppiyil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and Rajendran 16 336/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Puthuparambil (>75%) No damage found in 17 445/18 Edathiruthy Chakki Ainikkattu Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Page 1 Kodungallur Appeal allowed and Sunilkumar 18 444/18 Edathiruthy Yes percentage increased Palappetty to 60 - 74 Appeal allowed and Sreenivasan 19 443/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Kanakkampurakkal (>75%) No damage found in Shaila Johny 20 463/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Chittilappilly originally assessed No damage found in Shailesh 21 372/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Velayudhan originally assessed No damage found in 22 365/18 Edathiruthy Dinesh Velayudhan Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 23 425/18 Chendrapinny Remani Chavuveettil Yes percentage increased to 16 - 29 No damage found in Nandini 24 447/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Ramakrishnan originally assessed No damage found in 25 441/18 Edathiruthy Babu T C Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Sahada Appeal allowed and 26 446/18 Edathiruthy Korattil,14/64, Yes changed to complete loss 9562226285 (>75%) No damage found in Omanakuttan 27 376/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Puthuveettil originally assessed No damage found in Bharathan 28 378/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalakudath originally assessed No damage found in 29 382/18 Edathiruthy Mohanan Parappully Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in 30 421/18 Edathiruthy Shahida Jabbar Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 31 439/18 Edathiruthy Ambika Bahuleyan Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Valliyamma 32 442/18 Edathiruthy Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalakoodath originally assessed No damage found in Thanka 33 438/18 Chendrapinny Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Arakkaparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and 34 381/18 Edathiruthy Sarada Bhaskaran Yes changed to complete loss (>75%) Appeal allowed and Ammu 35 437/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Ramakrishnan (>75%) Appeal allowed and Santhosh 36 440/18 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss Arakkaparambil (>75%) Page 2 Kodungallur Appeal allowed and 346/18, Saraswathy 37 Edathiruthy Yes changed to complete loss 129773 Kanjiraparambil (>75%) No damage found in 213/18, 38 Methala Anil Mullassery Yes Appeal rejected excess of what 4496/18 originally assessed Appeal allowed and Krishnan 39 224/18 Lokamaleswaram Yes changed to complete loss Kochinadan (>75%) No damage found in 40 401/18 Pullut Rathi Valayil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and Kousalia 41 70/18 Perinjanam Yes changed to complete loss Kanakkassery (>75%) Appeal allowed and 42 344/18 Pappinivattom Balan Chennara Yes changed to complete loss (>75%) No damage found in Pavizham 43 237/18 Ala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Madathiparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and 44 435/18 Edathiruthy Vimala Erayil Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Unnikrishnan 45 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Palakkaparambil originally assessed No damage found in 46 112003/18 Methala Singh K P Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed No damage found in Sunil 47 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thundiparambil originally assessed Appeal rejected and 48 112003/18 Methala Yamuna Prakasan Yes percentage decreased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and 49 112003/18 Methala Gopi Attasseri Yes percentage decreased to 30 - 59 No damage found in Sajan V K 50 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Valiyaparambil originally assessed Appeal rejected and Rathika 51 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Nelliparambath 16 - 29 No damage found in Madhu 52 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kannamparambil originally assessed No damage found in Chandrika 53 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Vadakkedath originally assessed No damage found in Neelambaran 54 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kuzhikkattu originally assessed No damage found in Indira 55 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Neduparambil originally assessed Page 3 Kodungallur No damage found in Kavitha 56 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kalluparambil originally assessed No damage found in Kousalya 57 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Mananchery originally assessed No damage found in 58 112003/18 Methala Balan Valiparambil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Sathi No damage found in 59 112003/18 Methala Arayammattuparam Yes Appeal rejected excess of what bil originally assessed Appeal rejected and 60 112003/18 Methala Valsan Nadumuri Yes percentage decreased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Liju Sunil 61 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Thandasseril 16 - 29 Appeal allowed and 62 112003/18 Methala Vilasan Mullezhathu Yes percentage increased to 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Rema 63 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Kaimaparambil 15 No damage found in Subrahmanian 64 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Alakkal originally assessed No damage found in Saseendra 65 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thandasseri originally assessed Satan M L Appeal allowed and 66 112003/18 Methala Mullasseril Yes percentage increased to (Sulochana) 16 - 29 Peethambaran No damage found in 67 112003/18 Methala Thekkilakattil Yes Appeal rejected excess of what (Raman) originally assessed No damage found in Anilan 68 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kozhiparambil originally assessed No damage found in 69 112003/18 Methala Sarada Mullezhath Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Appeal rejected and Rugmini 70 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Oliparambil 16 - 29 Appeal rejected and Reshma 71 112003/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Thambiparambil 15 No damage found in Anandan 72 112003/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Plavungaparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and Sheela Manoj 73 112003/18 Perinjanam Yes changed to complete loss Munpuveettil (>75%) Appeal rejected & Michael P I, 74 3306/18 Methala Yes percentage decreased to Palaparambil (H) 15% Bava,Mathilakath Allowed & changed to 75 4212/18 Chendrappinni Yes (H) complete loss (>75%) Page 4 Kodungallur Mukundan (Bindu Allowed & changed to 76 4311/18 Methala Yes Syamkumar) complete loss (>75%) Sabitha, Appeal allowed & 77 3616/18 Panangad Yes Thottupurath (H) increased to 30-59% Appeal allowed & Aneesa, 78 3633/18 Pullut Yes percentage increased to Alamprambil (H) 30-59% No damage found in Remadevi, 79 4204/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Pazhooparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Mallika K R, 80 3971/18 Pullut Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Koroparambil (H) originally assessed Mohanan No damage found in 81 3972/18 Pullut (Pushpavathi) Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Nadumuri (H) originally assessed No damage found in 82 3975/15 Pullut Thara, Valthara (H) Yes Appeal rejected excess of what originally assessed Kamalakshi K M No damage found in 83 3981/8 Methala (Kishore N V), Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Nedumparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Anthony Joseph, 84 4167/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Kariyaparambil (H) originally assessed No damage found in Kousalya T K, 85 4182/18 Methala Yes Appeal rejected excess of what Thottuparambil (H)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    85 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us