DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1837 Debate on Roman Catholicism Between

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 1837 Debate on Roman Catholicism Between ENACTING THEOLOGY, AMERICANISM, AND FRIENDSHIP: THE 1837 DEBATE ON ROMAN CATHOLICISM BETWEEN ALEXANDER CAMPBELL AND BISHOP JOHN PURCELL Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Herbert Dean Miller, M.Div. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August, 2015 ENACTING THEOLOGY, AMERICANISM, AND FRIENDSHIP: THE 1837 DEBATE ON ROMAN CATHOLICISM BETWEEN ALEXANDER CAMPBELL AND BISHOP JOHN PURCELL Name: Miller, Herbert Dean APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ William V. Trollinger, Jr., Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _______________________________________ Brad J. Kallenberg, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _______________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _______________________________________ Mark A. Noll, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _______________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Department of Religious Studies Chairperson ii © Copyright by Herbert Dean Miller All rights reserved 2015 iii ABSTRACT ENACTING THEOLOGY, AMERICANISM, AND FRIENDSHIP: THE 1837 DEBATE ON ROMAN CATHOLICISM BETWEEN ALEXANDER CAMPBELL AND BISHOP JOHN PURCELL Name: Miller, Herbert Dean University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. William Vance Trollinger, Jr. This dissertation is an historical study of the 1837 debate on Roman Catholicism between Bishop John Purcell (1800-1883) and his Protestant challenger Alexander Campbell (1788-1866). Held for one week in Cincinnati, this debate showcased two of the Ohio Valley’s leading religious personalities as they argued about Catholicism in historical, theological, and political terms. This dissertation offers an account of the origins and events of the weeklong debate. It also makes two constructive arguments. First, for Purcell and Campbell participating in the debate was an exercise in “pastoral apologetics.” That is to say, each man understood his participation in the debate as an expression of his ministerial calling. Second, the form of the debate itself provided the conditions for a friendship that emerged between the men in the years that followed. iv The Campbell-Purcell debate has been recognized as an historically significant event. As Margaret DePalma notes, in United States history “it was the only occasion in which an American Catholic bishop held an oral debate with a Protestant minister” (Dialogue on the Frontier, 96). Beyond this important fact, the debate and the events that followed offer readers two noteworthy takeaways. First, they provide a counter-narrative to what would become a common storyline of Protestant Nativism in the antebellum period. Second, they are a reminder for contemporary Christian theologians that theological disagreement can be simultaneously robust and civil, while also serving as the starting point for Christian friendship. v For Aimee and the girls vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing a dissertation is both a solitary and communal event. The writer is obviously engaging in the solitary activity of wrestling with ideas and struggling to put them on paper; but s/he is supported by a community of friends who energize and sharpen the writing process. As I complete this project, I am reminded of the great debt I owe those friends who have shared this journey with me. I would like to thank my colleagues for their helpful suggestions and patience as they listened to my muddled thoughts: Jason Hentschel for his feedback on Common Sense Realism and comments about Thomas Reid’s confidence in sense knowledge, as well as the helpful suggestion about Nicholas Wolterstorff; D. Michael Cox for our frequent, and often loud, conversations in the library; Phil Webster for a long-distance friendship that provided much encouragement as this project came to its conclusion; and Justin Yankech for being a dependable source of encouragement on the Ph.D. journey. I would be remiss not to thank the institutional friends who supported my research financially along the way: the Cushwa Center for the Study of American Catholicism at the University of Notre Dame for giving me a Research Travel Grant; the Office for Graduate and Academic Affairs at the University of Dayton for a Graduate Student Summer Fellowship; and the Disciples of Christ Historical Society in Nashville, TN for a Ketcherside Scholarship. vii Also, I am grateful to the following archives and centers for their assistance along the way: the Archives of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati; the Cincinnati History Library and Archives; the Athenaeum of Ohio; the University of Notre Dame Archives; the U.S. Catholic Collection and the Archives at the University of Dayton; the Archives and Special Collections at Bethany College; the Disciples of Christ Historical Society; Cincinnati Christian University and Seminary; and Emmanuel Christian Seminary. Additionally, I owe a debt of thanks to the participants who offered valuable feedback on a paper I presented at the Conference on Faith and History at Pepperdine University in 2014. Finally, Father David Endres, editor of U.S. Catholic Historian, for his encouragement to develop part of what appears in this dissertation for an article; that process was a valuable experience that ultimately strengthened my writing in this project. It should go without saying that I stand on the shoulders of my teachers. But I want to single out a few. The Rev. Jeff Gill who taught a Disciples of Christ History and Polity class in which he set early Stone-Campbell history in a pastoral context; that single insight was incredibly formative for my thinking. Dr. Paul Blowers of Emmanuel Christian Seminary for his early encouragement to take up this topic. W. Dennis Helsabeck, now retired from Milligan College, who never formally taught me in a classroom, but was nonetheless my teacher in a great many things related to the Stone- Campbell Movement. To all the members of my committee, I owe a great deal of thanks. Drs. Brad Kallenberg and Vincent Miller offered keen philosophical questions that have sharpened my thinking about the debate. Dr. William Portier, whose Modernism seminar and book project, Divided Friends, probably influenced my theological frame of reference in ways I have not yet come to fully appreciate. Dr. Susan Trollinger, who, viii though she did not sit officially on my committee, I count as an honorary member; her suggestions about and feedback on dissoi logoi turned out to be major contributions to the development of my thinking in this project. Dr. Mark Noll offered insightful questions and invaluable comments that were matched only by his kindness and generosity. And finally, my dissertation director, Dr. William Trollinger. Under his direction, I gladly received the meals he paid for at Tank’s, as well as his advice about my project. I will not forget his tireless encouragement and readiness to entertain even the wildest ideas about my dissertation. But more than advising me about my topic, he modeled the intellectual virtues of honesty, humility, and charity; and in doing this, he taught me the craft of historical scholarship. I am grateful. As I conclude these acknowledgements, I thank my wife Aimee for her unrelenting support and patience in this Ph.D. program, specifically during the dissertation phase. Spouses of doctoral students know in a way foreign to most the sacrifices that go into finishing a doctoral program. I could not have done it without her. And to my children, Sophie, Sidney, and Savannah: I am grateful for their joy, curiosity, playfulness, and probing theological questions. They remind me that as long as there are children asking questions about God, theologians will never have quite the right words to speak about the Divine Mystery. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION ................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. vii INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 I. INTRODUCING ALEXANDER CAMPBELL AND BISHOP JOHN PURCELL ..14 II. THE 1836 EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE DEBATE ...........................................58 III. THE DEBATE: THEOLOGICAL AUTHORITY .....................................................95 IV. THE DEBATE: THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN AMERICA ................145 V. THE PUBLIC RECEPTION OF THE DEBATE AND CAMPBELL AND PURCELL’S RELATIONSHIP..............................................................................180 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................211 x INTRODUCTION The Debate Propositions On January 13th, 1837, the Catholic Bishop John Purcell (1800-1883) walked into a small Protestant church a block south of his cathedral in Cincinnati. There he met Alexander Campbell (1788-1866), the founder of a major new American religious movement known as the Disciples of Christ. The crowd that surrounded them was about to witness the only time in U.S. history when “an American Catholic bishop held an oral debate with a Protestant minister.”1 Campbell and Purcell met three months earlier at a conference on education and clashed over a disagreement about
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oracles Scripture in Old Testament
    Oracles Scripture In Old Testament Dissociated Edwin sometimes uncap any terrorisers jangling autographically. If wrathless or uncovered Alic usually sensitizes his Maratha syllabised dissimilarly or departmentalized plaguily and unfilially, how clear is Siddhartha? Rushed and epigene Dabney still dissembles his pegh veritably. Points of reference New Testament disciples of Christ need some know take that ago can rightly divide handle accurately the efficient of. Few writings of the OT are so consistently and persistently rooted in the eschaton as five That classic eschatological formula in that day arms the. You need to scriptures speak words we are founded on, as his instruction in scripture. Christians saw were female oracles as divine Deseret News. ORACLE in the KJV Bible 21 Instances Page 1 of 1 Expand such Limit your Search Results All KJV books Old number only a Testament only Apocrypha. The short form JahYah which appears in Exodus 152 and 1716 Psalm 99 Song of Songs 6 is preserved also in theophoric names such as Elijah my errand is Jah Malchijah my marry is Jah and Adonijah my waffle is Jah etc as fertile as grasp the phrase Hallelujah. The name Malachi appears nowhere else spend the Hebrew Bible The only perk of. Romans 31-2 The Oracles of ballot by Carl Westerlund. Have been framed to scriptures mentioned but fruit. Oracles--A good translation the Scriptures of the correct Testament as containing a revelation of. It be developed different senses, brought you will pierce him speak to recall the problem of that there were intended to the testament scripture in old testament and.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Idea of Nestorian Crosses— Based on Fa Nixon's
    QUEST: Studies on Religion & Culture in Asia, Vol. 2, 2017 INVESTIGATION OF THE IDEA OF NESTORIAN CROSSES— BASED ON F. A. NIXON’S COLLECTION Chen, Jian Andrea Published online: 1 January 2017 ABSTRACT It is generally agreed that the study of the Nestorian Cross (a kind of bronze piece believed to be an early Chinese Christian relic), has great significance both for the developing study of Jingjiao and for ethnographic studies of the Nestorian Mongol people. The most important question that we should ask, however, is, “Are these so-called Nestorian Crosses part of the Mongolian Nestorian heritage?“ In other words, before starting to interpret the pieces in question, we need to ask if the identification, made at the first step of examination, is convincing enough as a basis upon which to build the interpretation. This paper focuses on issues concerning all aspects of the concept of Nestorian Crosses, looking first into the history of such an idea, then investigating its inner logic, and finally challenging its hard evidence. It is hoped that the conclusions of this paper will initiate a paradigm shift in the current study of this topic. Introduction to the Study The Jingjiao and the Yelikewen The name “Nestorian Crosses” clearly reveals that the religious dimension has been the primary consideration in the existing identification of these items, an identification which subsumes them as relics of Chinese Nestorianism, or more accurately, of the Jingjiao and the Yelikewen. Although controversies surround the identity of Nestorianism, the most commonly accepted description is as follows: At the Ephesus Council of 431 A.D., the Patriarch Nestorius was deemed heretical and his teaching anathematized due to his insistence that Mary should be called “Christotokos (Christ-bearer)” instead of “Theotokos (God-bearer).” This insistence is thought to emphasize a distinction between Christ’s divine and human natures instead of their unity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecumenical Ecclesiology in Its New Contexts: Considering the Transformed Relationship Between Roman Catholic Ecclesiology and Ecumenism
    religions Article Ecumenical Ecclesiology in its New Contexts: Considering the Transformed Relationship between Roman Catholic Ecclesiology and Ecumenism Kristin Colberg Department of Theology, College of Saint Benedict, St. John’s School of Theology & Seminary, Collegeville, MN 56321-2000, USA; [email protected] Received: 20 August 2018; Accepted: 25 September 2018; Published: 26 September 2018 Abstract: The quest for Christian unity is entering a new phase amidst the movement’s many voices, perspectives and tensions. Christians are witnessing the advent of an emerging ecumenical paradigm, which, because it is not fully realized, is still realizing its full definition. The paradigm operates in a global context rather than a Eurocentric one, and even as it is more global, it is simultaneously more local. It cultivates shared praxis while being less concerned with the comparison of dogmas. Ecclesiology is also entering a new paradigm which shares many features with its ecumenical counterpart, particularly its global perspective and interest in shared praxis ahead of dogmatic questions. Even though ecumenism and ecclesiology share common trajectories, their journeys are unfolding in largely parallel rather than cooperative and mutually-enriching ways. This raises the question: What opportunities might arise from examining the shifts in ecumenism and ecclesiology together? This article examines how new methodological and practical developments in these two fields can form and inform one another. It studies the shift to synodality in the Catholic Church and the turn towards discernment in the ecumenical sphere as manifestations of similar theological commitments and a common interest in cultivating participatory processes. The seismic changes reshaping the religious landscape are transforming the relationship between ecumenism and ecclesiology; yet a strong connection between them endures and illumines paths forward for the church in the third millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith
    Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith-Stade, David Published in: Theoforum 2010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Heith-Stade, D. (2010). Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism. Theoforum, 41(3), 373- 385. https://www.academia.edu/1125117/Eastern_Orthodox_Ecclesiologies_in_the_Era_of_Confessionalism Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Theoþrum, 4l (2010), p. 37 3-385 Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism "[I believeJ in one, holy, catholic and apostolic church." Creed -Nicaeno-Constantinopolitan DAVID HEITH-STADE Lund University, Sweden The Eastern Orthodox Church was a self-evident phenomenon in Byzantine society.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenotic Ecclesiology: Context, Orientations, Secularity Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Theology Faculty Research and Publications Theology, Department of 1-1-2016 Kenotic Ecclesiology: Context, Orientations, Secularity Thomas Hughson Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. "Kenotic Ecclesiology: Context, Orientations, Secularity," in Seekers and Dwellers: Plurality and Wholeness in a Time of Secularity. Ed. Philip J. Rossi. Washington DC : Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2016: 95-130. Permalink. © 2016 Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. Used with permission. 4. Kenotic Ecclesiology: Context, Orientations, Secularity THOMAS HUGHSON, S.J. Four communicative disjunctions are ways in which, “the Catholic Church today is … out of phase with the world it wants to speak to.”1 Unless and until the influence of Pope Francis permeates the Church at all levels and in all contexts his charismatic leadership cannot be said to have changed this condition altogether. He surely has set a direction away from the clerical culture among bishops that abetted sweeping clergy abuse of minors under a rug of silent re-assignments. Even the Church now represented in the deeds and words of Francis cannot by-pass coming to grips with the disjunctions and with abuse. So George McLean’s theological response to the disjunctions and crisis of abuse remains a valid, long-term project. He advises nothing less than, “… rethinking the entire nature of the Church and its public presence in quite different, indeed kenotic, terms.” 2 That is a tall theological order. 3 What does a theological project of that scope involve? Outlining some directions along which to think about a kenotic theology of the Church draws on more than theological reflection and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism
    Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism For the church sometimes known as the Nestorian Church, see Church of the East. "Nestorian" redirects here. For other uses, see Nestorian (disambiguation). Nestorianism is a Christological doctrine advanced by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople from 428–431. The doctrine, which was informed by Nestorius' studies under Theodore of Mopsuestia at the School of Antioch, emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. Nestorius' teachings brought him into conflict with some other prominent church leaders, most notably Cyril of Alexandria, who criticized especially his rejection of the title Theotokos ("Bringer forth of God") for the Virgin Mary. Nestorius and his teachings were eventually condemned as heretical at the First Council of Ephesus in 431 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, leading to the Nestorian Schism in which churches supporting Nestorius broke with the rest of the Christian Church. Afterward many of Nestorius' supporters relocated to Sassanid Persia, where they affiliated with the local Christian community, known as the Church of the East. Over the next decades the Church of the East became increasingly Nestorian in doctrine, leading it to be known alternately as the Nestorian Church. Nestorianism is a form of dyophysitism, and can be seen as the antithesis to monophysitism, which emerged in reaction to Nestorianism. Where Nestorianism holds that Christ had two loosely-united natures, divine and human, monophysitism holds that he had but a single nature, his human nature being absorbed into his divinity. A brief definition of Nestorian Christology can be given as: "Jesus Christ, who is not identical with the Son but personally united with the Son, who lives in him, is one hypostasis and one nature: human."[1] Both Nestorianism and monophysitism were condemned as heretical at the Council of Chalcedon.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\User\Documents\Aaadocs
    Vatican Archives of the Sacred Congregation "de Propaganda Fide" 1622-1846 vol. 6 CONGRESSI 1622-1836 PART 3 1831-6 [entries nos. 001-234] 407 408 Table of Contents of Part 3 413 Congressi, America Settentrionale (nos. 001-234) 409 410 ENTRIES 1831-6 (nos. 001-234) 411 412 ENTRIES ENTRY NUMBER: 001 SERIES: Congressi, America Settentrionale VOLUME: 3 (1831-6) FOLIOS: 6rv-7rv LANGUAGE: English LOCATION: Rome DATE: 03 oct 1833 AUTHOR: Thomas Weld, cardinal RECIPIENT: Macdonell, bishop [Alexander McDonell, bishop of Kingston], in Glengarry TYPE OF DOCUMENT: Autograph copy signed DESCRIPTION: The writer acknowledges the addressee's letter of 2 jul [02 jul 1833]. As it preceded W.J. O'Grady [William John O'Grady] "a few days" [f.6r], the "printed account of that Gentleman which it contained" [f.6r] has been most useful. A further letter will address the W.J. O.Grady [William John O'Grady] issue. The writer also acnowledges two other letters from the addressee. The first was dated in aug [00 aug 1832], and was received towards the end of last year [1832]. The second letter was dated "on the outside" [f.6r] 28 nov 1832, was directed via Le Havre, arrived on 7 mar [07 mar 1833], and it contained the postulation for R. Gaulin [Rémi Gaulin]. The copy sent via England was never received, the last one received from there being dated 9 sep [09 sep 1832]. Bulls forr Gaulin [Rémi Gaulin] should have been received by the addressee. Larkin [John Larkin], "tho' a most pious man" [f.6r], was not the right man for the addressee's diocese.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Heritage of Unity and Fellowship
    OUR HERITAGE OF UNITY AND FELLOWSHIP Writings of Leroy Garrett and W. Carl Ketcherside Edited and Published by Cecil Hook Order From: Cecil Hook (Mira Prince) 905 Forest Canyon Cove Round Rock TX 78664 (512) 716-3066 Table of Contents DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................i Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 1. It Began In Scotland.................................................................................................................8 2. Thomas Campbell Writes His Declaration of Independence ................................................13 3. The Spirit of the “Declaration and Address” ........................................................................17 4. Principles of the Document ....................................................................................................23 5. Historic Notes on Our First Church .......................................................................................27 6. “Let Christian Unity be Our Polar Star” ................................................................................29 7. The Noblest Act in Barton Stone’s Life.................................................................................34 8. Learning from a Backwoods Preacher ...................................................................................40 9. Christians in Babylon.............................................................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Cloister Chronicle 317
    liOISTER+ CnROIDCliFL ST. JOSEPH'S PROVINCE The Fathers and Brothers of St. Joseph's Province extend Sympathy their prayers and sympathy to the Rev. V. F. Kienberger, O.P., and to the Rev. F. ]. Barth, O.P., on the death of their mothers; to the Rev. C. M. Delevingne, O.P., on the death of his brother. St. Vincent Ferrer's Church in New York was honored on Cloister Oct. 10, by a visit of His Eminence, Eugenio Cardinal Visitors Pacelli, Papal Secretary of State. Accompanied by His Eminence, Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Archbishop of New York, the Cardinal Secretary made a thorough tour of the beautiful church. His Excell ency, the Most Rev. John T. McNicholas, O.P., Archbishop of Cincinnati, returned to St. Joseph's Priory, Somerset, Ohio, on the oc­ casion of the thirty-fifth anniversary of his elevation to the Holy Priest­ hood. The Archbishop celebrated Mass in St. Joseph's Church on the morning of Oct. 10. Before returning home, he spent some two hours in conversation with the Brother Students. Sept. 20-21, Immaculate Conception Convent in Washington was host to the Most Rev. John Francis Noll, D.D., B:shop of Fort W ayne, Ind., whose visit was occasioned by the investiture of the late Rt. Rev. Msgr. John J. Burke, C.S.P. Tuesday, Oct. 20, the Most Rev. Stephen J. Donahue, D.D., Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of New York, administered the Sacrament of Confirmation to a large class of children and adults at St. Vincent Ferrt!r's, in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • John W. Welch, “'All Their Creeds Were an Abomination':A Brief Look at Creeds As Part of the Apostasy,”
    John W. Welch, “‘All Their Creeds Were an Abomination’:A Brief Look at Creeds as Part of the Apostasy,” in Prelude to the Restoration: From Apostasy to the Restored Church (Provo, UT and Salt Lake City: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University and Deseret Book, 2004), 228–249. “All Their Creeds Were an Abomination”: A Brief Look at Creeds as Part of the Apostasy John W. Welch John W. Welch is a professor of law at Brigham Young University and editor-in-chief of BYU Studies. On October 15, 1843, the Prophet Joseph Smith commented, “I cannot believe in any of the creeds of the different denominations, because they all have some things in them I cannot subscribe to, though all of them have some truth. I want to come up into the presence of God, and learn all things: but the creeds set up stakes, and say, ‘Hitherto [1] shalt thou come, and no further’; which I cannot subscribe to.” While Latter-day Saints gladly and gratefully recognize that all religious creeds contain some truth, the problem is that those formulations of doctrine also contain errors or impose limits that are “incompatible with the gospel’s inclusive commitment to truth and continual [2] revelation.” Such mixing of truth and error is reminiscent of the parable of the wheat and the tares, the Lord’s most [3] salient teaching on the nature of the Apostasy (Matthew 13:24–30, 37–43; JST Matthew 13; D&C 86:1–11). Thus, the creeds themselves, as vessels of mixed qualities, become metaphors or manifestations of the Apostasy itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Pius Ix and the Change in Papal Authority in the Nineteenth Century
    ABSTRACT ONE MAN’S STRUGGLE: PIUS IX AND THE CHANGE IN PAPAL AUTHORITY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Andrew Paul Dinovo This thesis examines papal authority in the nineteenth century in three sections. The first examines papal issues within the world at large, specifically those that focus on the role of the Church within the political state. The second section concentrates on the authority of Pius IX on the Italian peninsula in the mid-nineteenth century. The third and final section of the thesis focuses on the inevitable loss of the Papal States within the context of the Vatican Council of 1869-1870. Select papal encyclicals from 1859 to 1871 and the official documents of the Vatican Council of 1869-1870 are examined in light of their relevance to the change in the nature of papal authority. Supplementing these changes is a variety of seminal secondary sources from noted papal scholars. Ultimately, this thesis reveals that this change in papal authority became a point of contention within the Church in the twentieth century. ONE MAN’S STRUGGLE: PIUS IX AND THE CHANGE IN PAPAL AUTHORITY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by Andrew Paul Dinovo Miami University Oxford, OH 2004 Advisor____________________________________________ Dr. Sheldon Anderson Reader_____________________________________________ Dr. Wietse de Boer Reader_____________________________________________ Dr. George Vascik Contents Section I: Introduction…………………………………………………………………….1 Section II: Primary Sources……………………………………………………………….5 Section III: Historiography……...………………………………………………………...8 Section IV: Issues of Church and State: Boniface VIII and Unam Sanctam...…………..13 Section V: The Pope in Italy: Political Papal Encyclicals….……………………………20 Section IV: The Loss of the Papal States: The Vatican Council………………...………41 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..55 ii I.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ISSUE of REBAPTISM at Issue Is How We Are to Understand the Purpose of Baptism As Well As the Mode of Baptism
    THE ISSUE OF REBAPTISM At issue is how we are to understand the purpose of baptism as well as the mode of baptism. If baptism if for the purpose of receiving forgiveness from God for past sins, then one does not have salvation prior to baptism - because salvation cannot be granted us while we are still in our sinful state. If baptism is not for the purpose of receiving forgiveness for past sins, then it is not essential to salvation because our sinful state was changed prior to baptism. In this case, baptism is understood as a required rite, but one that only "testifies" to the forgiveness, acceptance, that God has already granted us. One key text in this discussion (but not the only one) is Acts 2:38. Below are several English translation renderings of this text. King James Version - "for the remission of sins. American Standard Version - "unto the remission of sins. New King James Version - "for the remission of sins." New International Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Revised Standard Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." New Revised Standard Version - "so that your sins may be forgiven." New American Standard Bible - " for the forgiveness of your sins." World English Bible - "for the forgiveness of sins." Bible in Basic English - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Contemporary English Version - "so that your sins will be forgiven." Good News Bible - "so that your sins will be forgiven." God's Word - "so that your sins will be forgiven." Young's Literal Translation - "to remission of sins." Modern King James Version
    [Show full text]