Autoportraits Texte-Image Chez Leonor Fini

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autoportraits Texte-Image Chez Leonor Fini « Dans mes peintures je ne dis jamais JE ». Autoportraits texte-image chez Leonor Fini Valérie Mandia Thèse soumise à la Faculté des arts dans le cadre des exigences du programme de doctorat en lettres françaises Département de français Faculté des arts Université d’Ottawa © Valérie Mandia, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 ii RÉSUMÉ ....................................................................................................................................... vii REMERCIEMENTS .................................................................................................................... viii LISTE DES SIGLES ....................................................................................................................... ix OUVERTURE .................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 8 1. La littérarité de l’œuvre d’une peintre ...................................................................................... 8 2. État de la question : l’expression plastique au détriment de l’expression littéraire dans le surréalisme au féminin .................................................................................................................. 9 3. Objectifs de recherche ............................................................................................................ 15 4. Corpus ..................................................................................................................................... 17 5. Méthodologie et outils théoriques .......................................................................................... 19 5.1 Démarche analytique intermédiale et picturocritique ....................................................... 20 5.2 Le « tiers pictural » ........................................................................................................... 22 5.3 Bris épistémologique : « ouvrir l’œil du texte » illisible .................................................. 24 5.4. Écriture de soi .................................................................................................................. 26 CHAPITRE I : LES LIVRES D’ARTISTE OU L’ENTRE-DEUX LIVRE ................................. 27 1. Présentation du corpus ............................................................................................................ 27 1.1. Des livres ouvertement autobiographiques ...................................................................... 27 1.2. Des livres à la lisière des genres ...................................................................................... 28 1.3. Confusion terminologique dans le discours critique : à chacun sa définition du livre d’artiste ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.4 Méthodologie plurielle : comment entrer dans ces livres? ............................................... 32 2. Itinéraire : comment entrer dans les livres d’artiste de Leonor Fini? ..................................... 33 2.1 Passer par la façade du texte ............................................................................................. 33 2.2 Plan intratextuel ................................................................................................................ 35 2.3 Plan intertextuel ................................................................................................................ 36 3. Analyse ................................................................................................................................... 36 3.1. Le Livre de Leonor Fini (1975) ....................................................................................... 36 3.1.1. Le livre en surface ..................................................................................................... 36 3.1.1.1. Paratextes auctorial et éditorial ........................................................................... 37 3.1.1.2. Le titre................................................................................................................. 42 3.1.1.3. Images paratextuelles ......................................................................................... 43 a. La couverture ........................................................................................................... 43 b. Les pages de garde et la page de faux-titre .............................................................. 44 3.1.1.4. La préface ........................................................................................................... 46 iii a. Le Musée imaginaire ................................................................................................ 46 b. « Dans les pas de la main » ...................................................................................... 49 3.1.1.5. Le pacte de lecture .............................................................................................. 51 3.1.1.6. L’index illustré .................................................................................................. 53 3.1.2. Plan intratextuel : intermédialité à l’œuvre ............................................................... 57 3.1.2.1. Espace familial ................................................................................................... 58 3.1.2.2. Espace-je(ux) ...................................................................................................... 66 a. Je(ux) de scène ......................................................................................................... 66 b. Je(ux) de l’image ...................................................................................................... 75 3.1.2.3. Des espaces intermédiaires ................................................................................. 77 a. Les trains .................................................................................................................. 77 b. La morgue ................................................................................................................ 79 3.1.3. Plan intertextuel ......................................................................................................... 82 3.1.3.1 Textes littéraires de Leonor Fini .......................................................................... 82 3.1.3.2. Hybridité de la voix narrative ............................................................................. 87 3.1.3.4. Le Livre de Leonor Fini, une « nouvelle sorte » d’autofiction? ......................... 90 3.2. Miroir des chats (1977) ................................................................................................... 94 3.2.1. Le livre en surface ..................................................................................................... 94 3.2.1.1. Présentation matérielle et péritexte ..................................................................... 94 3.2.1.2. Quel chat pour Miroir des chats? : le chat « immédiat » et le chat « complètement transformé » ........................................................................................ 103 3.2.1.3. La jaquette et l’image paratextuelle .................................................................. 104 3.2.1.4. Retour sur le titre du livre : de l’autre côté du miroir ....................................... 106 3.2.2. Plan intratextuel ....................................................................................................... 107 3.2.2.1. Le miroir d’Alice et des surréalistes ................................................................. 107 3.2.2.2. Le masque comme substitut du pictural ........................................................... 109 3.2.2.3. Intermédialité à l’œuvre .................................................................................... 114 a. Des mots qui reflètent, des images qui masquent .................................................. 114 b. Au pays des mots imagés ....................................................................................... 116 c. Des mots qui métamorphosent l’image .................................................................. 119 d. Les images produites par la main humaine ............................................................ 122 3.2.3. Plan intertextuel ....................................................................................................... 124 3.2.3.1. Intertexte pictural .............................................................................................. 124 iv 3.2.3.2. Intertexte littéraire : la voix littéraire, la sienne, celle des autres ..................... 127 a. Des noms et des titres empruntés ........................................................................... 128 b. Des références littérales ......................................................................................... 132 c. Des références à ses propres textes ........................................................................ 137 3.3. Chats d’atelier (1988) .................................................................................................... 138 3.3.1. Le livre en surface : le paratexte éditorial ............................................................... 138 3.3.1.1. Le péritexte et l’épitexte ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Pygmalion My Fair Lady
    a comparison of the first scene of: PYGMALION with the first scene of: MY FAIR LADY I-1-1 PYGMALION by George Bernard Shaw ACT ONE Scene One Covent Garden at 11.15 p.m. Torrents of heavy summer rain. Cab whistles blowing frantically in all directions. Pedestrians running for shelter into the market and under the portico of St. Paul's Church, where there are already several people, among them a lady and her daughter in evening dress. They are all peering out gloomily at the rain, except one man with his back turned to the rest, who seems wholly preoccupied with a notebook in which he is writing busily. The church clock strikes the first quarter. THE DAUGHTER (in the space between the central pillars, close to the one on her left) I'm getting chilled to the bone. What can Freddy be doing all this time? He's been gone twenty minutes. THE MOTHER (on her daughter's right) Not so long. But he ought to have got us a cab by this. A BYSTANDER (on the lady's right) He won't get no cab not until half-past eleven, missus, when they come back after dropping their theatre fares. THE MOTHER But we must have a cab. We can't stand here until half-past eleven. It's too bad. I-1-2 THE BYSTANDER Well, it ain't my fault, missus. THE DAUGHTER If Freddy had a bit of gumption, he would have got one at the theatre door. THE MOTHER What could he have done, poor boy? THE DAUGHTER Other people got cabs.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ovid's “Pygmalion”
    The Complex Relationship of Ars and Natura: How Ovid’s “Pygmalion” Employs the Power of the Artist Kelsey Littlefield ‘17 ublius Ovidius Naso, commonly known as Ovid, was a Roman poet and author who lived during the reign of P Augustus Caesar. He is renowned as poet of great variety and skill, and no work so wonderfully displays his talent as his Metamorphoses, a massive volume of mythological stories of transformation. Throughout the Metamorphoses, art and nature serve as unifying themes and are present in some capacity in each myth Ovid recounts. In particular, art and nature are prevalent in the myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with his ivory creation. An important contrast develops between art and nature in this story, and that contrast speaks to how the senses are woven into both. Roman literature is fond of treating the subjects of art and nature, and their contrasting figures appear again and again in the best works of the Ancient World. These two didactic terms are often used in elegiac poetry as a means of deciphering the interwoven relationships among the poet, lover, and girl (poeta, amator, and puella).1 The poet and the lover are one in the same, as the poet attempts to express the love and the experience of the beloved (i.e., the puella) to his reader. There is also, however, a sense of lament, as in all elegiac poetry, as the beloved has an unattainable quality that eventually leaves the poet/lover in despair. The girl, more specifically Pygmalion’s own beloved,2 exemplifies the erotic nature displayed in Ovid’s version of elegiac poetry and the grappling of the role that the artist plays in shaping his own art.
    [Show full text]
  • My Fair Lady
    TEACHER RESOURCE GUIDE Teacher Resource Guide by Sara Cooper LINCOLN CENTER THEATER AT THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT André Bishop Adam Siegel Producing Artistic Director Hattie K. Jutagir Managing Director Executive Director of Development & Planning in association with Nederlander Presentations, Inc. presents LERNER & LOEWE’S Book and Lyrics Music Alan Jay Lerner Frederick Loewe Adapted from George Bernard Shaw’s play and Gabriel Pascal’s motion picture “Pygmalion” with Lauren Ambrose Harry Hadden-Paton Norbert Leo Butz Diana Rigg Allan Corduner Jordan Donica Linda Mugleston Manu Narayan Cameron Adams Shereen Ahmed Kerstin Anderson Heather Botts John Treacy Egan Rebecca Eichenberger SuEllen Estey Christopher Faison Steven Trumon Gray Adam Grupper Michael Halling Joe Hart Sasha Hutchings Kate Marilley Liz McCartney Justin Lee Miller Rommel Pierre O’Choa Keven Quillon JoAnna Rhinehart Tony Roach Lance Roberts Blair Ross Christine Cornish Smith Paul Slade Smith Samantha Sturm Matt Wall Michael Williams Minami Yusui Lee Zarrett Sets Costumes Lighting Sound Michael Yeargan Catherine Zuber Donald Holder Marc Salzberg Musical Arrangements Dance Arrangements Robert Russell Bennett & Phil Lang Trude Rittmann Mindich Chair Casting Hair & Wigs Production Stage Manager Musical Theater Associate Producer Telsey + Company Tom Watson Jennifer Rae Moore Ira Weitzman General Manager Production Manager Director of Marketing General Press Agent Jessica Niebanck Paul Smithyman Linda Mason Ross Philip Rinaldi Music Direction Ted Sperling Choreography Christopher Gattelli Directed by Bartlett Sher The Jerome L. Greene Foundation is the Lead Sponsor of MY FAIR LADY. Major support is also generously provided by: The Blanche and Irving Laurie Foundation • Florence Kaufman The New York Community Trust - Mary P. Oenslager Foundation Fund • The Ted & Mary Jo Shen Charitable Gift Fund The Bernard Gersten LCT Productions Fund • The Peter Jay Sharp Foundation’s Special Fund for LCT with additional support from the National Endowment for the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmalion Study Guide April 16
    STUDY GUIDE 2004 CONTAINS ONTARIO CURRICULUM SUPPORT MATERIAL PYGMALION by Bernard Shaw Education Partner PRESENTS Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw This study guide for Pygmalion contains background informa- tion for the play, suggested themes and topics for discussion, and curriculum-based lessons that are designed by educators and theatre professionals. TABLE OF CONTENTS The lessons and themes for discussion are organized in mod- ules that can be used independently or interdependently ac- cording to your class’s level and time availability. The Players ..............................................................................3 The general information is on white paper and the lessons are on green. Running Time .........................................................................3 The Author..............................................................................4 THIS GUIDE WAS WRITTEN AND COMPILED BY DENIS The Characters ........................................................................5 JOHNSTON, DEBRA MCLAUCHLAN, AND JOHN SWEENEY. The Story .............................................................................6-7 ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE PROVIDED BY BARBARA WORTHY, JACKIE MAXWELL, AND SUE LEPAGE West End Gossip Sheet.........................................................8 Director’s Notes .....................................................................9 Classroom Application Before Attending the Play .............................................10-17 Pygmalion After Attending the Play................................................18-24
    [Show full text]
  • My Fair Lady": a Comparison of the Vision of Two Authors and What Each Play Says to Women
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1999 "Pygmalion" vs "My Fair Lady": A comparison of the vision of two authors and what each play says to women Jessica Lynn Raymer University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Raymer, Jessica Lynn, ""Pygmalion" vs "My Fair Lady": A comparison of the vision of two authors and what each play says to women" (1999). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 980. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/fa7r-6qdw This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmalion Pigmalione
    R R PYGMALION PIGMALIONE by di George Bernard Shaw George Bernard Shaw NOTE: some words/phrases (written in italic) NOTA: alcume parole/espressioni (scritte in corsivo) contained within the lines of the play are “Cockney” English, all’interno delle battute dell’opera sono forme dialettali milanesi, the accent or dialect of English traditionally spoken by working-class Londoners, tradotte in lingua italiana a piè di pagina. and have been translated into standard English at the foot of each page. È VIETATA LA RIPRODUZIONE, ANCHE PARZIALE, È VIETATA LA RIPRODUZIONE, ANCHE PARZIALE, CON QUALSIASI MEZZO EFFETTUATA, COMPRESA LA FOTOCOPIA, CON QUALSIASI MEZZO EFFETTUATA, COMPRESA LA FOTOCOPIA, ANCHE AD USO INTERNO O DIDATTICO, NON AUTORIZZATO. ANCHE AD USO INTERNO O DIDATTICO, NON AUTORIZZATO. L’autore su misura a desiderio del suo Pigmalione. Ottenuti a prezzo di scontri, conflitti George Bernard Shaw nacque a Dublino il 26 luglio 1856 e nel 1876 si e di duro lavoro su se stessa l’agognata trasformazione e il conseguente trasferì a Londra dove, pochi anni dopo, iniziò la sua attività di scrittore, successo sociale, Eliza si rende conto di provare un trasporto sentimentale di critico letterario e musicale e, più tardi, di drammaturgo. Nel 1884 aderì verso il professor Higgins che, invece, non si espone... lasciando la giovane al movimento socialista e si dedicò a scrivere pamphlet per divulgarne allieva a decidere cosa scegliere per il proprio futuro. il pensiero. Nel 1892 iniziò a scrivere per il teatro. Le sue prime pièce furono molto influenzate dalla sua visione politica e dalle sue ambizioni Note di regia di riforme sociali.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pygmalion-Galatea Myth in Relation to Simulation Scenarios in Star Trek
    Xjenza Online - Journal of Malta Chamber of Scientists http://www.mcs.org.mt/ Doi: http://dx.medra.org/10.7423/XJENZA.2013.2.03 Review Article The Pygmalion-Galatea myth in relation to simulation scenarios in Star Trek Victor Grech1 1Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Malta Abstract. Star Trek has existed since 1966, with a ST accedes to this notion by attempting to explain total of 738 hours of viewing time. Like most science future scientific advances leading to the seemingly im- fiction, the series frequently alludes to religion or myth possible. Typical examples include travelling faster than but censors such references for the modern world-view light and other technological miracles, thereby eliciting by sanitising them with scientific or scientific-sounding a sense of wonder. explanation. This paper illustrates the depiction of the In all of these ways, the franchise provides an inter- Galatea-Pygmalion myth in the franchise and relates face between literature and other metanarratives, such these to simulation scenarios. as the sciences. Indeed, entire books have been written on the physics portrayed in ST (Krauss, 1995). Thus, and to quote just one example, the notion of the instan- taneous matter transporter has been explored in exten- 1 Introduction sive depth. This investigation details accidents that ST Star Trek (ST) has been with us since 1966, and com- has documented resulting from the utilisation of such prises a vast corpus of works that include twelve films exotic technology, the physics of the reality of what the and six series (one of which is animated).
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Pygmalion and Galatea
    The Myth of Pygmalion and Galatea The myth of Pygmalion and Galatea is probably one of the most known stories in Greek Mythology. The myth of Pygmalion and Galatea is also one of the most influential and inspiring ancient Greek myths, and became the main theme for theatrical plays, movies and artistic paintings. Pygmalion the Sculptor Pygmalion was a talented Greek sculptor from Cyprus. After becoming disgusted by some local prostitutes, he lost all interest in women and avoided their company completely. Pygmalion saw women as flawed creatures and vowed never to waste any moment of his life with them. He dedicated himself to his work and soon created Galatea, a beautiful stature of a woman out of ivory. Ironically, the masterpiece of his life was this statue of a woman. Perhaps he sought to correct in marble the flaws he saw in women of flesh and blood. Pygmalion’s Statue Whatever the case, Pygmalion worked so long and with such inspiration on the statue of Galatea, that it became more beautiful than any woman that had ever lived or been carved in stone. As he finished the statue’s features, they became exquisitely lovely, and he found himself applying the strokes of hammer and chisel with increasing affection. When his chisel finally stopped ringing, there stood before him a woman of such perfection that Pygmalion, who had professed his disdain of all females, fell deeply in love. He would bring it gifts, caress it, kiss it and talk to it every day. He brought it gifts he thought women would enjoy, such as pretty seashells, beads, songbirds, baubles and flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Preparation Guide
    TEACHER PREPARATION GUIDE Book and lyrics by ALAN J. LERNER, Music by FREDERICK LOEWE Based on the play Pygmalion by GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Directed By VICTORIA BUSSERT TABLE OF CONTENTS Dear Educator ………………………………………………………………………..... 3 A Note to Students: What to Expect at the Theater…………………………………… 4 GLT: Our History, Our Future………………………………………………………... 5 Director’s Note .......................…………………………………………………………. 6 George Bernard Shaw ... ………………………………………………………………. 8 Scenes & Musical Numbers ……………………………………………………………. 9 The Inspiration …………………………………………………………………………. 10 Past Performances of Pygmalion & My Fair Lady …………………………………….. 12 Idaho Shakespeare Festival’s Production of My Fair Lady …….………………………. 14 Costume Design………………………………………………………………………… 16 Scenic Design…………………………………………………………………………... 20 Questions for Discussion Prior to Attending the Performance ………………………… 21 Activities ……………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Writing Prompts …………………………………………………………………..…… 25 A Brief Glossary of Theater Terms …………………………………………………….. 26 How to Write a Review ………………………………………………………………… 28 A Sample Review Written by a Student ……………………………………………….. 29 Questions for Discussion After Attending the Performance …………………………… 30 Notes …………………………………………………………………………………… 34 Generous Support …………………………………………………………………….... 37 About Great Lakes Theater ………….…………………………………………………. 38 ן TEACHER PREPARATION GUIDE: MY FAIR LADY 2 Fall 2016 Dear Educator, Thank you for your student matinee ticket order to Great Lakes Theater’s production My Fair Lady by Alan J. Lerner and Frederick
    [Show full text]
  • Bertil-Vallien-Catalogo-9-Rooms.Pdf
    BV cop.indd 1 10/08/12 12.17 BV cop.indd 1 10/08/12 12.17 Bertil Vallien, Nine Rooms 13th International Architecture Exhibition La Biennale di Venezia Editorial Coordination Design and Layout Francesca Giubilei studio +fortuna / studio cheste Paola Fortuna / Peppe Clemente Texts by Jim Baker Photo Credits Rosa Barovier Mentasti Göran Örtegren Dawn Bennet Anders Qwarnström Adriano Berengo Jonas Lindström Giacinto Di Pietrantonio Nadia Taiga p. 14 Francesca Giubilei Laura Christine Johnson Pre-Press Matthew Kangas Puntofotolito, Sara Cupoli Ewa Kumlin Gunnar Lindqvist Cover Marcel Paquet Bertil Vallien, Resting Head Andreas Ravelli (detail), 2009 Lino Tagliapietra Photo Anders Qwarnström William Warmus We apologize if, due to reasons English Translations wholly beyond our control, Brenda Lea Stone some of the photo surces have Emily Ligniti not been listed. Editing Emily Ligniti Bertil Vallien, Nine Rooms 13th International Architecture Exhibition La Biennale di Venezia Venice Thanks to our Collaborators With the Support and Cooperation of 28 August Marco Berengo 25 November 2012 Luca Berta Laura Bresolin Istituto Veneto di Scienze Stefano Donò Lettere ed Arti Mauro Falcier Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti Gianni Gallo Grafiche Veneziane Produced and Organized by Gruppo Fallani Berengo Studio Karlsson Spedition AB Roberto Lazzari Curators Stefano Lo Duca Adriano Berengo Walter Maccaro With the Patronage of and Börge Kamras Gianluca Rossetti Sandro Santi With the Assistance of Falegnameria Santini Francesca Giubilei Giovanni Scarpa Studio CandC
    [Show full text]
  • From Puppet to Cyborg: Posthuman and Postmodern Retellings of the Pinocchio Myth
    FROM PUPPET TO CYBORG: POSTHUMAN AND POSTMODERN RETELLINGS OF THE PINOCCHIO MYTH By Georgia Panteli Thesis submitted to University College London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CENTRE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY & INTERCULTURAL INQUIRY (CMII), SCHOOL OF EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, CULTURE & SOCIETY (SELCS) UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON 1 Declaration of Authorship I, [Georgia Panteli] confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The myth of Pinocchio is the story of a puppet that desires to become human and achieves it with the power of his will. Created by Carlo Collodi in The Adventures of Pinocchio, the myth of Pinocchio is linked to the fairy tale tradition and is the most recent manifestation of the animate/inanimate archetype. This thesis is the first systematic study of the Pinocchio myth and examines how it has been used and reinterpreted in different retellings across different media and disciplines. The first part of this study focuses on Pinocchio retellings in film and shows that the most contemporary example of the Pinocchio myth is in the story of the sentient cyborg/robot that desires humanity. Moving from the classic in the field of cyborg studies Blade Runner through Spielberg’s A.I. Artificial Intelligence, which directly links the robot to Pinocchio, to the least technophobic and most transhumanist Battlestar Galactica, Chapter 1 demonstrates how all case studies are connected to Collodi’s novel through the confrontation scene, a specific passage in the text which touches upon the core of the Pinocchio myth, as Pinocchio is confronted both by the Blue Fairy and his corporeality.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Registry Registrar's Periodical Template
    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 0459478 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 2 BURLEY MEN MOVING LTD. Other Prov/Territory Registered 2017 MAR 09 Registered Address: 300 - 444 Corps Registered 2017 MAR 07 Registered Address: 5TH AVENUE SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2P2T8. 7703-30TH ST SE, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2C1V4. No: 2120288416. No: 2120278771. 10096954 CANADA INC. Federal Corporation 2021324 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2017 MAR 01 Registered Address: 1600, 333 Corporation Incorporated 2017 MAR 01 Registered - 7TH AVENUE SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2P Address: 10012 FRANKLIN AVENUE, FORT 2Z1. No: 2120270810. MCMURRAY ALBERTA, T9H 2K6. No: 2020213241. 10103063 CANADA CORPORATION Federal 2022237 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Corporation Registered 2017 MAR 07 Registered Corporation Incorporated 2017 MAR 13 Registered Address: 158 WATERSIDE COURT, CALGARY Address: 9629 - 82 AVENUE, EDMONTON ALBERTA, T3L 0C9. No: 2120283268. ALBERTA, T6C 0Z9. No: 2020222374. 10132438 CANADA INC. Federal Corporation 2022741 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2017 MAR 07 Registered Address: 214-558 Corporation Incorporated 2017 MAR 14 Registered MILLBOURNE ROAD EAST NW, EDMONTON Address: 6118 80 AVE NE APT 1415, CALGARY ALBERTA, T6K 3N4. No: 2120282815. ALBERTA, T3J 0S6. No: 2020227415. 10145564 CANADA LTD. Federal Corporation 2023085 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2017 MAR 15 Registered Address: 205 - 215 Corporation Incorporated 2017 MAR 14 Registered MCLEOD AVENUE, SPRUCE GROVE ALBERTA, Address: 2600, 10180 - 101 STREET, EDMONTON T7X 0G2.
    [Show full text]