DOCSLIB.ORG

Index to Volume 21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1967 Joumal of the Lepidopterists' Society 283 INDEX TO VOLUME 21 ( New names in boldface) Achalarus, 207, 244, 277 Artines, 165 Achylodes, 163, 245 Ascia, 155, 189 Acreteus, 115 Asterocampa, 137, ~~07, 277 Acronycta, 170, 175 Astraptes, 115, 160, 244 Actias luna, 249,255 caternacoensis, 116 Actinote, 95, 192 escalantei, 115 Adela, 211 Atalopedes campestris, 207, 277 Adelpha, 87, 98, 105 Atlides, 152 Aecas, 165 Atrytone delaware, 207, 277 Aemilia roseata, 273 Augiades, 158 Aeria, 87, 94, 190 Autochton, 160, 207, 244, 277 Agraulis, 97, 192,207, 277 Automeris, 140 Agriades (podarce), 272 Barbicornis, 88, 147 Agrias, 84, 87, 104 Baeotis, 148 Aguna, 159 Battus, 87-89, 156, 189,207,209,277 Aides, 167 Ba uer, D. L., Spiders and Pselldohazis, Alesa, 146 212 Aletia, 176 Bauer, W. R., New sp. of Anepia, 235 Amarynthus, 87, 148 Biblis, ]03,194 Amblyscirtes, 207, 277 Bolla, 245 American Museum of Natural History Boloria, 136, 211 additions, 180 Bombycia, 12 Amphipyra, 171, 172 Bomolocha rarnsladti, 125 Amphidecta, 87, 90 Book notices, 7, 2L, 40, 106, 120, 143, Anaea, 83, 104, 195,207,277 144,274 Anartia, 98, 194 Brachyglenis, 147 Anastrus, 163, 245 Brassolidae, 191 Anatolc, 150 Brazil Lepidoptera, 77, 145 Ancyluris, 87, 147 Brephidiu111, 132 Anepia plUlnasata, 236 Brown, F. M., Palmer's collecting local­ Anisochoria, 87, 162 ities, 129 Annaphila, 211 Larvae of Celerio as food for Indians, Antcos, 155, 190 144 Anteros, 149, ]96 Lorquin's locahties "Sonora" and Anthocaris, 131, 207, 212, 272, 277 "Utah," 271 Anthoptus, 164, 246 Brown, K. S., Lepidoptera of Central Antigonus, 162, 24.5 Brazil Plateau, 77, 145 Antirrhea, 90, 191 Brown, R. M., Observations on Callophrys Apamea lignicolora, 172 viridis, 113 Apatelodes, 35 Buckett, .I. S., Ncw sp. of Anepia, 235 Apodemia, 87, 129, 149, 272 Bungalotis, 160 Appias, 155 Cabares, 244 Arawacus, 152 Caenurgina, 122 Arcas, 1.51 Caeruleuptychia, 87, 91 Archonias, 155 Calephelis, 148, 196,281 Arctiidae, 38, 138, 273 Caligo, 192 Argiope, 212 Callarctia quenselii, 38 Argyreuptychia, 87 Callicista, 153 Aricoris, 150 Callicore, 85, 100 Arkansas Rhopalocera, 206, 277 Callidula, 101 284 Index to Volume 2J Vol. 21, no. 4 Caliimormus, 164, 246 Consul, 105 Callitaera, 191 Conway, P. J., Oeneis macounii in Mani- Callithomia, 95, 191 toba,258 Caliophrys, 113, 152, 195 Cook collection, 180 Calociasma, 197 Cook, VV. C. (1895-1967),279 Calpodes, 207, 247, 277 Corticea, 246 Calycopis, 153, 196, 207, 277 Cossidae, 34 Camptopleura, 163 Cremna, 87, 146 Canada, butterfly records, 135 Cressonia juglandis, 253 Caria, 53, vejenlo, 54 Crowe, C. R., Albinic female of Pier is Carrhenes, 245 sisymbrii, 121 Carystoides, 166 CumbIe, 166 Catacore, 87, 101 Cydoglypha, 87, 163 Catagramma, 194 Cybdelis, 102 Catoblepia, 87, 88 Cycnus,152 Catocala, 170 Cyllopsis, 191 Catonephele, 83, 100, 194 Cymaenes, 165, 216 Celaenorrhinus, 160 Cynea, 166, 246 Celastrina argiolus, 207, 277 Dalla, 164 Celerio, 144, 254 Danaus, 31, 108, 109, 132, 191, 207, 277 Cephise, 160 Dasylophia, 36 Ceratomia amyntor, 252 Datana,36 Ceratonyx, 11, 13 Day-flying habit in moths, 211 Cercyonis, 87, 136,208 Diaeus, 161 Cerura,37 Diapause, photoperiod effects on, 255 Chalodeta, 148 Dione, 97, 192 Chamaelymnas, 87, 147 Dircenna, 94, 191 Charadra, 170 Dirphia curitiba, 202 Charis, 196 Dismorphia, 155, 189 Charmona, 87, 148, 196 Diurnal Microlepidoptera, 211 Chioides, 159, 243 Dornfeld, E. J., New Coenonympha, 1 Chiomara, 163 Doxocopa, 87, 103, 105 Chlorippe, 195 Drephalys, 158 Chlosyne, 71, 98, 193,207, 277 Dryaclula, 97, 192 Chneour collection, 180 Dryas, 192 Chorinea, 87, 147 Dynamine, 83, 99, 105, 194 Cluysophanus titus, 207,277 Eades penelope, 202 Cicinnus melsheimeri, 34 Ebrietas, 163, 245 Cisthene unifascia, 38 Ectima,102 Clench, H. K., Note on Caria, 53 Elbella, 157 Distribution records for Philotes, 141 Electrostrymon, 184 Type localities of Neotropical Lycaeni- Ematurgina, 149 clae, 181 Embedment in plastic, 107 Clostera, 35 Emergence structures of Actias luna, 249 Cobalopsis, 165 Emesis, 87, 149, 196 Coclatractus, 159, 244 Emmel, T. C. and J. F., Papilio indra Coenonympha, 1, 132 biology, 41 eunomia,3 Range extension of CaJIophrys, 114 Cogia, 87, 161,244 Papilio machaon group, 211 Colaenis, 97 Entheus, 160 Colias, 132, 207, 277 Enantia, 189 Colobura, 104 Epargyreus, 132, 158, 207, 244, 277 Comstock, J. A., Sphinx sequoiae early Epiphile, 101 stages, 27 Episcada, 94 Conga, 166, 246 Eprius,246 1967 ] ournal of the Lepidopterists' Society 285 Erebia,136 Heliopetes, 133, 162,,205, 246 Erynnis, 124, 131, 133 Hemiargus, 151, 19(3,207, 277 Euchloe, 136, 208 Henne, C., Sphinx sequoiae early stages, Euclidina, 124 27 Euphydryas, 132, 208, 261 Hermeuptychia, 91 Euphyes, 119,207, 277 Hesperia, 136, 207, 277 donahuei, 116 Hesperiidae, 83, U5, 122, 131, 136, Euptoieta, 105, 193,207, 277 157, 205, 207, 243, 277 Euptychia, 90, 191, 207, 277 Hesperocharis, 87, 155 Euptychoides, 91 H essel, J. H., portable black light, 112 Eurema, 87, 154, \90,207,277 Heterocampa subrotata, 37 Eurois astricta, 169 Heterogenea shurtleffi, 33 Eurybia, 87, 146, 196 H eteropacha rileyana, 35 Euselasia, 87, 146, 196 Historis, 104, 195 Euthyatira, 13 Holland, R., Collecting in Newfoundland, Eutychide, 246 210 Evenus, 151 Howe collection, 180 Everes, 123, 1.32, 135, 151, 196, 207, 277 Howe, W. n., Vanessa migration, 39 Evonyme, 85, 87, 102, 105 Hylephila, 166, 207, 247, 277 Exoteleia nepheos, 9; spp., 15-20 Hyalophora angulift,ra, 34 Fox, R. M., Book review, 7 Hypanartia, 98, 194 Franclcmont, J. G., Ceratonyx identity Hyparpax aurora, 3G and larva, 11 Hypna,88 Frederick collection, 180 Hypoleria, 87, 94, 191 Freeman, H. A., New Mexican Hesperi­ Hyposcada, 190 idae, 115 Hypostrymon, 183 Status of Heliopetes sublinea, 205 Hypothyris, 88, 95, L90 Polythrix octomaculata in Texas, 278 Jaspis, 87, 152 Freeman, T. N., New Exoteleia, 9 Ibarra collection, 180 Gardiner, B. O. C., Rearing Lonomia Incisalia, 132, 180, ~~07, 277 cynira, 1.38 Itabalia, 189 Life history of Periphoba hireia, 198 Ithomia, 94, 190 Glaucopsyche, 123 Jemadia, 157, 244 Gelechiidae, 9, 15 J uditha, 87, 150 Geometridae, 11, 57 Jumalon, J. N., Trogonoptera trojana, 49 Gesta, 163 Junonia, 59, 63, 98, 194, 207, 277 Gindanes, 162 ] ustinia, 88, 166 Gluphisia lintneri, 36 Klots collection, 180 Godyris, 191 Kolyer, J. M., Polyester castings, 107 Gorgythion, 161 Krivda, W . V. , Monarch in Sask., 31 Grais, 163 Lacinipolia, 173, 17:5 Graphiphora, 170, 172 Lacosomidae, 34 Graphium, 88, 137, 157, 188, 207, 277 Lane, M. C., Cook Obituary, 279 Greta, 191 Lasaia, 148, 196 Guppy, R., Mimicry of Caenurgina Lasiocampidae, 35 caerulea, 122 Leech, H. B., Pronin Obituary, 74 Cynaecia, 195 Lemonias, 197 Hamadryas, 83, 85, 87, 102, 195 Lepricornis, 147 Hamearis, 145 Leptophobia, 189 Haploa,38 Leptotes, 151, 208 Hardwick, D. F., Schinia life history, 22 Lerema, 166,207, 277 Harrisina americana, 34 Lerina incarnata, 273 Hegesippe, 157 Lerodea eufala, 167, 207,277 Helias, 163, 245 Leucania pseudargyria, 176 Heliconius, 77, 109, 192, 248 Leueiclia, 155 286 Imlex to Volume 21 Vol. 21, no. 4 Leucochimona, 146, 196 Mites from noctuid moths, 169, 254 Leucophlebia, 8 Mithras, 151 Leuschner, R., Day-flying moths, 211 Mitoma, 120, 132, 137, 207, 211, 277 Levina, 164 Mnasitheus, 246 Libytheidae, 105, 195,207,277 Mnasicles, 165 Libythina, 85, 87, 102 Mnasilus, 165 Limacodidae, 33 Moeris, 165, 246 Limenitis, 32, 132, 195, 207, 213, 277 Moiz, S. A., Host specificity of Polydorus, latifascia, 221 127 Limlquist, O. H., Exoteleia biology, 15 Monca, 246 Lonomia, 13R Monethe, 147 Lorquin's "Sonora" and "Utah," 271 Monroe, R. S. , Butterflies from Honduras, Lucida, 165 185 Lycaeides, 123, 132 I1esperiidae from Honduras, 243 Lycaena, 132, 207, 273, 277 Morpho, 82, 84, 89, 192 Lycaenidae, 53, 82, 106, 113, 114, 120, Morvina, 161 122, 132, 135, 145, 181, 195, 204, Morys, 88, 166 207, 211, 272, 277 Munshi, C. H., Host specificity of Lycaenopsis, 123 Polydorus, 127 Lycorea, 191 Mylon, 162, 245 Lymantriidae, 37 Myscelus, 158 Lymnas, 148 Mysoria, 157 Lyropteryx, 146 Naevolus, 166, 246 MacNeill, C. D., Mass movement by Napeogenes, 190 Satyrium saepium, 204 Narope, 87, 88 Macrurocampa, 37 Nastra, 165, 207, 246, 277 Macusia, 151 Nathalis iole, 132, 137,207,277 Marpesia, 99, 195 Nature conservancy, 275 Masters, J. H., Transplanted colony of Neominois, 131 Nessaea, 194 Mitoura, 120 Rhopalocera of NE Arkansas, 206 Newcomer, E. J., Early stages of Chlosyne, Oeneis macounii in Manitoba and Min­ 71 Cook obituary, 279 nesota,258 Newfoundland collecting, 210 Corrected Arkansas list, 277 Neophasia menapia, 272 Mather, B. , Variation in Junonia, 59 Nica, 102 Mechanitis, 95, 190 Niconiades, 167, 247 Megathymus, 210 Nisoniades, 16 L, 245 Melete, 155, 190 Noetuana, 245 Melitaea, 132, 136, 207, 272, 273, 277 Noctuidae, 22, 38, 122, 125, 169, 211, Mellana, 247 235,254 Mesene, 87, 149 Notheme, 87, 147 Mesosemia, 84, 87, 146 Notodontidae,35 Mestra,102 Nyctelius, 167 Metacharis, 87, 147 Nymphalidae, 31, 39, 59, 71, 77, 106, Metamorpha, 98, 194 Ill, 132, 1.35, 192, 207, 213, 240, Methods and Techniques, 107, 112 248, 261, 272, 277 Microceris, 87, 158 Nymphalis, 132, L36, 207, 240, 277 Microtia, 19.3 Nymphidium, 87, 150 Mielke, O. H. H., Butterflies of Brazilian Nymula, 87, 150 Planalto, 77, 145 Ochlodes, 133 Milanion, 162 Oeneis, 136, 258, 272 Mimicry, 122 Oleria,94 Mimoniades, 157 Ontario, 135 Ylinutes, Pacific Coast Section, 210 Opler, P. A., Observations of Callophrys 1967 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Societ!l 287 viridis, 113 Pieris, 121, 132, 135, 207, 277 Host plant records for Anthocaris, 212 Placidula, 94 Opsiphanes, 192 Plastic for mounting, 107 Orgyia plagiata, 37 Plebejus, 122, 132, 151, 252 Ouleus,245 POHn es zabulon, 207, 277 Pachyneuria, 16] Polites, 166,207,277 Pachysphinx modesta, 254 Polyctor, 161 Pacific Slope section, annual meeting, Polydorus, 127 210 Polygonia, 207, 277 Packardia elegans, 33 Polygon us, 159 Palaeacrita, 57 1'0Iysticbtis,87, 14S1 Palmer, Dr. Edward, Collecting localities Polythrix, 159, 160, 244 nf, 129 Pompeius, 166,207,247,277 Panara, 87, 147 Posttaygetis, 90 Panoquina, 87, 167, 207, 247, 277 Powell, J.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix F.7

    Appendix F.7

    APPENDIX F.7 Biological Evaluation Appendix F.7 Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project Biological Evaluation March 2019 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Reviewed and Approved by: USDA Forest Service BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION This page intentionally left blank BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION ALTERNATIVES .................................................... 1 PRE-FIELD REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 4 RESULTS OF FIELD SURVEYS ...................................................................................... 4 SPECIES IMPACT DETERMINATION SUMMARY .......................................................... 5 DETAILED EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION ON SPECIES CONSIDERED ............ 25 6.1 Global Discussion ........................................................................................................ 25 6.1.1 Analysis Areas and Current Environment ............................................................. 25 6.1.2 Impacts .................................................................................................................. 33 6.1.3 Conservation Measures and Mitigation ................................................................. 62 6.2 Species Accounts and Analysis of Impacts ................................................................. 63 6.2.1 Mammals ..............................................................................................................
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest

    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest

    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
  • Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports

    Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports

    DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published
  • Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies

    Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies

    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) ~19 2008 CORRECTIONS/REVIEWS OF 58 NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY BOOKS Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226-1254 Abstract. Corrections are given for 58 North American butterfly books. Most of these books are recent. Misidentified figures mostly of adults, erroneous hostplants, and other mistakes are corrected in each book. Suggestions are made to improve future butterfly books. Identifications of figured specimens in Holland's 1931 & 1898 Butterfly Book & 1915 Butterfly Guide are corrected, and their type status clarified, and corrections are made to F. M. Brown's series of papers on Edwards; types (many figured by Holland), because some of Holland's 75 lectotype designations override lectotype specimens that were designated later, and several dozen Holland lectotype designations are added to the J. Pelham Catalogue. Type locality designations are corrected/defined here (some made by Brown, most by others), for numerous names: aenus, artonis, balder, bremnerii, brettoides, brucei (Oeneis), caespitatis, cahmus, callina, carus, colon, colorado, coolinensis, comus, conquista, dacotah, damei, dumeti, edwardsii (Oarisma), elada, epixanthe, eunus, fulvia, furcae, garita, hermodur, kootenai, lagus, mejicanus, mormo, mormonia, nilus, nympha, oreas, oslari, philetas, phylace, pratincola, rhena, saga, scudderi, simius, taxiles, uhleri. Five first reviser actions are made (albihalos=austinorum, davenporti=pratti, latalinea=subaridum, maritima=texana [Cercyonis], ricei=calneva). The name c-argenteum is designated nomen oblitum, faunus a nomen protectum. Three taxa are demonstrated to be invalid nomina nuda (blackmorei, sulfuris, svilhae), and another nomen nudum ( damei) is added to catalogues as a "schizophrenic taxon" in order to preserve stability. Problems caused by old scientific names and the time wasted on them are discussed.
  • Appendix H: Invertebrates of the Lake Tahoe Basin

    Appendix H: Invertebrates of the Lake Tahoe Basin

    APPENDIX H INVERTEBRATES OF THE LAKE TAHOE BASIN APPENDIX H INVERTEBRATES OF THE LAKE TAHOE BASIN Erik M. Holst and Matthew D. Schlesinger Table H-1—Documented and potential invertebrates of the Lake Tahoe basin. Species endemic to Lake Tahoe are noted with an “X”. Reliability codes: 1 = high-documented occurrence; 2 = moderate-potentially occurring based on at least two sources or identified in areas adjacent to the basin; 3 = low-potentially occurring based on a single source. Sources consulted: Frantz and Cordone (1966, 1996), Kimsey (pers. comm.), Manley and Schlesinger (in prep), NAMC (1999), and Storer and Usinger (1963). Other sources: H = Hampton (1988); S = SFSU (1999a); USFW = USFWS (1999) Basin Storer & Frantz- Manley & Other Phylum Class Order Family Scientific name Common name endemic Reliability Kimsey Usinger Cordone Schlesinger NAMC sources Annelida Clitellata Haplotaxida Haplotaxidae Haplotaxis 1 X Haplotaxida Naididae Arcteonais lomondi 1 X Haplotaxida Naididae Uncinais uncinata 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Ilyodrilus frantzi typica 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Rhyacodrilus brevidentus X 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Rhyacodrilus sodalis 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Spirosperma beetoni X 1 X Haplotaxida Tubificidae Varichaetadrilus minutus X 1 X Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Kincaidiana freidris 1 X Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Rhynchelmis rostrata 1 X Hirudinea Pharyngobdellida Erpobdellidae Erpobdella punctata 1 X Pharyngobdellida Erpobdellidae Helobdella stagnalis 1 X Rhynchobdellida
  • Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised)

    Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised)

    Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America. 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) *Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Field Collecting and Sight Records for Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Butterflies of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Tulare and Fresno Counties, California by Ken Davenport¹ 8417 Rosewood Ave. Bakersfield, California 93306 1Museum Associate, C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 January 25, 2014 1 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: San Emigdio Blue (Plebejus emigdionis) near Onyx, Kern County, California, May 23, 2002. This is a very uncommon lycaenid butterfly endemic to a small area of southern California (see text). The type locality is in Kern County. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 2 Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California INTRODUCTION The information presented here incorporates data from collecting, scientific papers, published articles on butterflies, field guides and books, letters from lepidopterists and butterfly watchers. My purpose is to give an updated and annotated checklist of the butterflies occurring in Kern and Tulare Counties, California. This revised publication now includes specific records for all the species and subspecies known to occur in the region.
  • The Systematics of Polyommatus Blue Butterflies (Lepi

    The Systematics of Polyommatus Blue Butterflies (Lepi

    Cladistics Cladistics (2012) 1–27 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00421.x Establishing criteria for higher-level classification using molecular data: the systematics of Polyommatus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Gerard Talaveraa,b, Vladimir A. Lukhtanovc,d, Naomi E. Piercee and Roger Vilaa,* aInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marı´tim de la Barceloneta, 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; bDepartament de Gene`tica i Microbiologia, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain; cDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Science, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia; dDepartment of Entomology, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7 ⁄ 9, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia; eDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Accepted 11 June 2012 Abstract Most taxonomists agree on the need to adapt current classifications to recognize monophyletic units. However, delineations between higher taxonomic units can be based on the relative ages of different lineages and ⁄or the level of morphological differentiation. In this paper, we address these issues in considering the species-rich Polyommatus section, a group of butterflies whose taxonomy has been highly controversial. We propose a taxonomy-friendly, flexible temporal scheme for higher-level classification. Using molecular data from nine markers (6666 bp) for 104 representatives of the Polyommatus section, representing all but two of the 81 described genera ⁄ subgenera and five outgroups, we obtained a complete and well resolved phylogeny for this clade. We use this to revise the systematics of the Polyommatus blues, and to define criteria that best accommodate the described genera within a phylogenetic framework.
  • An Inventory and Baseline Monitoring of the Butterfly Fauna of the Carson Range, with Emphasis on the Lake Tahoe Basin Nevada State and Adjacent Lands

    An Inventory and Baseline Monitoring of the Butterfly Fauna of the Carson Range, with Emphasis on the Lake Tahoe Basin Nevada State and Adjacent Lands

    FY 2007 LAKE TAHOE LICENSE PLATE PROGRAM BUTTERFLY INVENTORY PROJECT An Inventory and Baseline Monitoring of the Butterfly Fauna of the Carson Range, with Emphasis on the Lake Tahoe Basin Nevada State and Adjacent Lands DRAFT REPORT Principal Investigators: T. Will Richardson, PhD. and Dennis D. Murphy, PhD. Department of Biology University of Nevada, Reno Contact: Will Richardson 16810 Glenshire Dr. Truckee, CA 96161 530.412.2792 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Focal sites........................................................................................................................ 4 Sampling methods:...................................................................................................... 4 General collection ........................................................................................................... 6 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 6 The Carson Range Butterfly Fauna ................................................................................. 6 Focal Site Sampling .......................................................................................................
  • (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 64: 267-273

    (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 64: 267-273

    ISSN 0015-5497, e-ISSN 1734-9168 Folia Biologica (Kraków), vol. 64 (2016), No 4 Ó Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, PAS, Kraków, 2016 doi:10.3409/fb64_4.267 On the Generic Position of Polyommatus avinovi (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)* Nazar SHAPOVAL and Vladimir LUKHTANOV Accepted September 15, 2016 Published December 2016 SHAPOVAL N., LUKHTANOV V. 2016. On the generic position of Polyommatus avinovi (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 64: 267-273. Polyommatus avinovi (Stshetkin, 1980), an enigmatic taxon from Tajikistan has been considered in the literature either as a member of the genus Polyommatus, or a taxon belonging to the genus Rimisia. None of the conclusions on taxonomy and nomenclature of P. avinovi were supported by molecular or cytological data, therefore the problem of identity and phylogenetic position of this taxon has remained unsolved. Here we use the barcoding fragment of the COI gene as a molecular marker to demonstrate that none of these hypotheses are true. Phylogenetic analysis revealed P. avinovi to be strongly differentiated from both Polyommatus and Rimisia. Instead, it formed a separated, well supported monophyletic clade within the genus Afarsia Korb & Bolshakov, 2011. Thus, we propose the following new combinations for this butterfly: Afarsia avinovi comb. nov. and Afarsia avinovi dangara comb. nov. Key words: Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatina, phylogeny, Afarsia avinovi comb. nov., Afarsia avinovi dangara comb. nov., DNA barcode. Nazar SHAPOVAL, Vladimir LUKHTANOV, Department of Karyosystematics, Zoological Insti- tute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Rus- sia; Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab.
  • Updating Emmel and Emmel's 1973 Butterflies of Southern California

    Updating Emmel and Emmel's 1973 Butterflies of Southern California

    Lepidoptera of North America 15 Butterflies of southern California in 2018: updating Emmel and Emmel’s 1973 Butterflies of southern California By Ken Davenport Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University 1 2 Lepidoptera of North America 15 Butterflies of southern California in 2018: updating Emmel and Emmel’s 1973 Butterflies of southern California by Ken Davenport 8417 Rosewood Avenue Bakersfield, California 93306-6151 Museum Associate C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 April 20, 2018 3 Front cover: Ford’s Swallowtail, Papilio indra fordi J.A. Comstock and Martin Image courtesy of Chuck Harp, LepNet project, C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity (www.LepNet.org) ISSN 1084-8819 This publication and others in this series are open access and may be accessed and downloaded at no cost at https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/discover/contributions of the c.p.Gillettemuseum Copyright 2018© 4 The purpose of this paper and progress made in the study of butterflies of southern California since 1973. It has now been more than 44 years since Thomas C. Emmel and John F. Emmel’s The Butterflies of Southern California was published on November 30, 1973. The Emmels’ provided a history of previous leaders in gathering information on the fauna of southern California butterflies, information on life zones and butterfly habitats and season progression. They also listed areas little visited that needed more field study. They covered 167 species and an additional 64 subspecies or segregates (many of those have since been elevated to species status or removed as segregates for not being all that distinct since 1973) known from southern California based on the boundaries they set and provided a list of rarely recorded or doubtful records, ten color plates, and literature cited.
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON NATURAL HERITAGE INFORMATION CENTER May 2004 Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Oregon State University 1322 SE Morrison Street Portland, OR 97214-2531 (503) 731-3070 http://oregonstate.edu/ornhic/ With assistance from: Native Plant Society of Oregon The Nature Conservancy Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Compiled and Published by the staff of the Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center: Jimmy Kagan, Director/Ecologist Eric Scheuering, Zoology Data Manager Sue Vrilakas, Botany Data Manager John Christy, Wetlands Ecologist, Bryologist Eleanor Gaines, Zoologist Jon Hak, GIS Program Manager Cliff Alton, Data Output/IS Manager Claudine Tobalske, GIS Analyst Fern McArthur, Botany Data Handler Annie Weiland, Zoology Data Assistant Kuuipo Walsh, GIS Analyst Theresa Koloszar, Office Manager/Grants Specialist Cover Illustration: Pink sand-verbena (Abronia umbellata ssp. breviflora) by Diane Bland. Bibliographic reference to this publication should read: Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center. 2004. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Oregon State University, Portland, Oregon. 105 pp. CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................................................1
  • Systematic Bibliography of the Butterflies of the United States And

    Systematic Bibliography of the Butterflies of the United States And

    Butterflies of the United States and Canada 497 SYSTEMATIC BIBLIOGRAPHY an Society 33(2): 95-203, 1 fig., 65 tbls. {[25] Feb 1988} OF THE BUTTERFLIES ACKERY, PHILLIP RONALD & ROBERT L. SMILES. 1976. An illustrated list OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA of the type-specimens of the Heliconiinae (Lepidoptera: Nym- (Entries that were not examined are marked with an asterisk) phalidae) in the British Museum (Natural History). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History)(Entomology) 32(5): --A-- 171-214, 39 pls. {Jan 1976} ACKERY, PHILLIP RONALD, RIENK DE JONG & RICHARD IRWIN VANE-WRIGHT. AARON, EUGENE MURRAY. 1884a. Erycides okeechobee, Worthington. Pa- 1999. 16. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Pa- pilio 4(1): 22. {[20] Feb 1884; cited in Papilio 4(3): 62} pilionoidea. Pp. 263-300, 9 figs., in: N. P. Kristensen (Ed.), AARON, EUGENE MURRAY. 1884b. Eudamus tityrus, Fabr., and its va- The Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. Volume 1: Evolu- rieties. Papilio 4(2): 26-30. {Feb, (15 Mar) 1884; cited in Pa- tion, Systematics and Biogeography. Handbuch der Zoologie pilio 4(3): 62} 4(35): i-x, 1-487. {1999} AARON, EUGENE MURRAY. [1885]. Notes and queries. Pamphila bara- ACKERY, PHILLIP RONALD & RICHARD IRWIN VANE-WRIGHT. 1984. Milk- coa, Luc. in Florida. Papilio 4(7/8): 150. {Sep-Oct 1884 [22 Jan weed butterflies, their cladistics and biology. Being an account 1885]; cited in Papilio 4(9/10): 189} of the natural history of the Danainae, a subfamily of the Lepi- AARON, EUGENE MURRAY. 1888. The determination of Hesperidae. doptera, Nymphalidae. London/Ithaca; British Museum (Nat- Entomologica Americana 4(7): 142-143.