DOCSLIB.ORG

Ise-Shima Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ise-Shima Progress Report Ise-Shima Progress Report G7 accountability on development and development-related commitments Ise-Shima Progress Report G7 accountability on development and development-related commitments Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................................7 Measuring Progress Against Commitments: 1. Aid and Aid Effectiveness .....................................................................9 2. Economic Development ......................................................................23 3. Health ............................................................................................................37 4. Water and Sanitation ............................................................................65 5. Food Security ............................................................................................73 6. Education ....................................................................................................83 7. Equality ........................................................................................................87 8. Governance................................................................................................95 9. Peace and Security ...............................................................................127 10. Environment and Energy ..................................................................135 Conclusions .....................................................................................................153 Annexes: Annex A – List of Commitments ...........................................................155 Annex B – Methodology for Assessment and Evaluation 5.......16 Annex C – Tracking Pledges to the Muskoka Initiative (Commitment 16) ...................................................................167 Annex D – Acronyms and Abbreviations ..........................................171 Executive Summary Development and empowerment of all 70.8% of all the donors of the OECD people have been a consistent priority Development Assistance Committee for the G7. Accountability and transparency (DAC). During the period from 2004 to remain core principles for the G7 in 2014, ODA volume demonstrated an order to maintain the credibility and upward trend for the United States (US), effectiveness of the decisions of G7 the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, Leaders. Following the L’Aquila Summit while the figures varied for the other G7 in 2009, we have agreed to publish a members. G7 members set several ODA comprehensive accountability report every commitments at the Gleneagles Summit three years in order to review the progress in 2005. Canada, the United States and made on our individual and collective most notably the UK have fulfilled this development-related commitments. target. The ratio of the G7’s ODA to Comprehensive accountability reports Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has were published in 2010 for the Muskoka shown a slight upward trend since 2005; G8 Summit and in 2013 for the Lough however, ODA from G7 members to Erne G8 Summit. The Ise-Shima Progress Land-Locked Developing Countries Report is the third volume. (LLDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and fragile states have remained This report covers 51 commitments in level. G7 members have also been 10 sectors: Aid and Aid Effectiveness, seeking to improve the quality of their Economic Development, Health, Water development assistance and maximize and Sanitation, Food Security, Education, the impact of development cooperation Equality, Governance, Peace and Security including through partnerships such as and Environment and Energy. Progress the Global Partnership for Effective on each commitment is measured Development Cooperation (GPEDC). against agreed baselines, indicators and data sources. By making progress Economic Development: toward these commitments, we are The G7 has supported economic contributing to progress toward the 2030 development in developing countries Agenda for Sustainable Development through reduction of global remittance adopted at the United Nations in 2015. costs, implementation of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), trade and Aid and Aid Effectiveness: infrastructure in Africa and responsible In 2014, G7 members collectively provided global supply chains. The global average Official Development Assistance (ODA) of cost of transferring remittances dropped USD 97,103 million that accounted for from 9.7% in 2009 to 7.4% in the fourth 1 Ise-Shima Progress Report quarter of 2015, which was still above AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (the the 5% target agreed by the G7 in 2009. Global Fund) and Gavi, the Vaccine The G7’s contributions for trade Alliance. The G7 increased their total facilitation to LDCs rose from USD 50.7 contribution to the the Global Fund million in 2012 to USD 89.2 million in from USD 1,266 million in 2006 to USD 2014 in response to the needs of LDCs 2,175 million in 2015 and nearly doubled as identified by needs assessments and their HIV/AIDS assistance from USD Diagnostic Trade Integration Studies 3,932 million in 2007 to USD 7,698 (DTIS). G7 members contribute trade million in 2014. Likewise, G7 countries facilitation assistance to support the contributed heavily to Gavi’s successful implementation of the TFA. In addition, 2015 replenishment, which secured G7 members have closely worked with USD 7.5 billion of financial resources partners to boost intra-Africa trade by for 2016-2020. All the G7 members fully facilitating One-Stop Border Posts achieved bilateral financial commitments (OSBPs) and regional infrastructure on maternal, newborn and under-five programs. G7 Leaders, moreover, have child health set at the Muskoka Summit committed to ensuring economic in 2010. The G7 is now on the final track development underpinned by the to support for the eradication of polio development of responsible global worldwide through the Global Polio supply chains. Eradication Initiative, and efforts must be re-doubled in Afghanistan and Health: Pakistan to achieve this historic goal. At The G7 made significant progress on its the Elmau Summit in 2015, the G7 made contributions to global health through three main commitments: (1) we bilateral and multilateral channels. The committed to preventing future outbreaks bilateral disbursements from the G7 from becoming epidemics by assisting increased from USD 8,686 million in countries to implement the World Health 2008 to USD 12,413 million in 2014. The Organization (WHO) International Health multilateral contributions have nearly Regulations (IHR), including through doubled from USD 3,236 million in 2008 the Global Health Security Agenda and to USD 5,830 million in 2014. The fight its common targets and other multilateral against AIDS, tuberculosis (TB), malaria initiatives; (2) committed ourselves to and vaccine-preventable diseases has the fight against neglected tropical made significant progress due to the diseases (NTDs); and (3) to support the G7’s strong and continuous financial WHO Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial support to the Global Fund to Fight Resistance to develop and effectively Ise-Shima Progress Report 2 implement our national action plans contributions to agriculture, food security and support other countries as they and nutrition in order to tackle hunger, develop their own national action plans. malnutrition and poverty in developing countries. Significant progress has been Water and Sanitation: made on the L’Aquila Food Security With the successful achievement of the Initiative (AFSI) since its launch in 2009 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as a global endeavor in response to the target on improved access to drinking 2007-2008 spikes in food prices. The G7 water, the G7 now proceeds to the Goal and other donors have collectively met (6) of Sustainable Development Goals a total pledge of USD 22.6 billion by (SDGs): “Ensure availability and 2015. G7 members and other partners sustainable management of water and have also made good progress on the sanitation for all”. G7 engagement, New Alliance for Food Security and confirmed in the 2003 G8 Evian Water Nutrition launched in 2012 to accelerate Action Plan, has expanded during the past the flows of private capital to African decade to the aggregate disbursement agriculture. The development partners of USD 6.9 billion in 2014. The G7 is disbursed USD 3.2 billion, or 75% of active in engaging in political initiatives expected funding by mid-2015, of which in the context of broader multilateral 96% came from G7 members. The frameworks and monitoring mechanisms, number of African countries participating such as Sanitation and Water for All and in the New Alliance has increased from the Global Water Partnership. In addition 3 to 10 countries, and the African to various global initiatives, G7 members governments advanced or completed have also focused on Africa by 91% of their policy commitments which strengthening the Africa-G8 Partnership were scheduled for completion by on Water and Sanitation. The G7 will mid-2015. Private companies signed remain active with the African Water 292 Letters of Intent, committing to Facility (AWF) of the African Development investing a total of USD 10.2 billion in Bank (AfDB), the African Minister’s African agriculture. Of the committed Council on Water (AMCOW), the Tokyo amount, USD 684.2 million was invested International Conference on African
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E-Development: from Excitement to Effectiveness
    34147 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized E-Development: From Excitement to Effectiveness Edited by Robert Schware Prepared for the World Summit on the Information Society Tunis, November 2005 Global Information and Communication Technologies Department THE WORLD BANK GROUP Washington, D.C. i E-Development: From Excitement to Efficiency ©2005 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Economic Strategy Phase 2: Strategic Action Plan
    Appendix "I" Muskoka Economic Strategy Phase 2: Strategic Action Plan Final Report s Submitted By: _ MALONE GIVEN g.PARSONS LTD. In Association With: The Centre for Spatial Economics (C4 SE) Funding Partnership: Canada FedNoI: September, 2009 Muskoka Economic Strategy Phase 2: Strategic Action Plan FINAL REPORT Submitted To: The District Municipality of Muskoka Planning & Economic Development Department 70 Pine Street Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 [email protected] Submitted By: In Association With: Malone Given Parsons Ltd. Centre for Spatial Economics 140 Renfrew Drive, Suite 20 I IS Martin Street, Suite 203 Markham, Ontario Milton, Ontario L3R6B3 L9T 2RI Tel: (905) 513-0170 Tel: (905) 878-8292 Fax: (905) 513-0177 Fax: (905) 878-8502 [email protected] [email protected] September, 2009 07:1643 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION ] ] .] Background ] ] .2 Objectives 2 ] .3 Study Process 3 ] .4 Strategic Action Plan Organization .4 2.0 PHASE 1: BACKGROUND REPORT SUMMARY 5 2.] Key Trends 5 2.2 Muskoka's Key Economic Sectors 7 2.3 Concluding Questions 9 3.0 ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES ] ] 3.] Sector-Wide Issues, Gaps and Opportunities ] ] 3.2 Sector-Specific Issues, Gaps and Opportunities ]4 3.2.] Natural Resources Sector 14 3.2.2 Manufacturing & Transportation Sector 15 3.2.3 Construction, Real Estate & Business Services Sector 17 3.2.4 Trade & Personal Services Sector 17 3.2.5 Public Sector ]8 3.2.6 Second Homes Sector 19 3.2.7 Information, Communications & Telecommunications (lCT) Sector .20 3.3 Tourism
    [Show full text]
  • Assistance for Research Canada.Pdf
    Programme on Innovation, Higher Education and Research for Development IHERD This report is authored by Janet Halliwell, as part of the Programme on Innovation, Higher Education and Research for Development (IHERD) hosted at the OECD and funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or Sida or of the governments of the OECD member countries. 2 Acknowledgements The author acknowledges with thanks valuable discussions with a number of IDRC staff and external partners. These have been invaluable in providing an in depth understanding of the motivations for and modus operandi of the IDRC activities, as well as a feeling for its trajectory of success over the last 40 years. 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The Canadian context ................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Canada’s prime instrument for development assistance for research and capacity building - IDRC .........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Muskoka Initiative and Global Health Financing
    May 2014 By Aniket Bhushan Winter 2012 The Muskoka Initiative andByBy Jennifer Vanessa Erin Ushie Slahub Global Health Financing In 2010, Canada led donor countries in launching the G-8 Muskoka Initiative for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH). The $2.85 This policy brief offers a billion 5 year commitment (2010-2015) was undertaken at the highest preliminary data level with the strong support of the Prime Minister. analysis of Canada's Muskoka MNCH health The funding commitment entails $1.1 billion in new and additional financing initiative, spending, over and above $1.75 billion in continued baseline funding. placing the same in the wider context of global The key finding from our analysis, based on data from the start of the health financing. The analysis sheds light on commitment to 2013, is that Canada is well on track to meet its financial the following questions: commitment. This is salutary, especially given the impact of fiscal austerity on the aid budget and other significant changes such as the Where is Canada with respect to its financing amalgamation of the former aid agency with the department of foreign commitment? affairs during this period. These changes have not deterred Canada’s commitment to global health. Canada emerges as a leader in global Where does Muskoka- MNCH funding go? And health financing and health is the most important sector in Canadian aid. who are the key Replicating official claims regarding the status of the initiative, however, partners? proved relatively difficult. While a lot of useful information has been made Which subsectors, available, this tends to be fragmented (across sources, data and format within health, are the types).
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Policy Facts
    Fast Policy Facts By Paul Dufour In collaboration with Rebecca Melville - - - As they appeared in Innovation This Week Published by RE$EARCH MONEY www.researchmoneyinc.com from January 2017 - January 2018 Table of Contents #1: January 11, 2017 The History of S&T Strategy in Canada ........................................................................................................................... 4 #2: January 18, 2017 Female Science Ministers .................................................................................................................................................... 5 #3: February 1, 2017 AG Science Reports ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 #4: February 8, 2017 The deadline approaches… ................................................................................................................................................. 7 #5: February 15, 2017 How about a couple of key moments in the history of Business-Education relations in Canada? .............. 8 #6: February 22, 2017 Our True North ........................................................................................................................................................................ 9 #7: March 8, 2017 Women in Science - The Long Road .............................................................................................................................. 11 #8: March 15, 2017 Reflecting on basic
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining BRICS Outreach: Motivations and Institutionalization
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL. Vol. 15. No 2 (2020) Explaining BRICS Outreach: Motivations and Institutionalization H. Zhao, D. Lesage Huanyu Zhao – PhD, Researcher, Ghent Institute for International Studies (GIIS), Ghent University – Department of Political Science; 8 Universiteitstraat, B­9000 Gent, Belgium; E­mail: [email protected] Dries Lesage – Associate Professor, Ghent Institute for International Studies (GIIS), Ghent University – Department of Political Science; 8 Universiteitstraat, B­9000 Gent, Belgium; E­mail: [email protected] Abstract This article examines and explains the outreach activity of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. We focus on two research puzzles: a) the motivations and b) the form and degree of the institutionalization of BRICS outreach. We define outreach as collaborative interaction among BRICS and other actors within and outside the BRICS area and focus on outreach to governments of non-BRICS countries and national top officials representing regional organizations. First, we offer a theoretical framework based on the experiences of the Group of 7/8 (G7/8) and the Group of 20 (G20), considering both commonalities and differences with BRICS. Second, we provide a detailed empirical analysis of BRICS outreach over time. Third, we explain BRICS outreach in light of the theoretical framework and enrich it based on our findings. Methodologically, we draw empirical information from official documents, news media and academic literature. We argue that the outreach activity of a major power grouping is reflective of its internal cohesion, as well as of how it defines its own position in the world and how it is perceived by others.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Development How Can the New Summit Architecture Promote Pro-Poor Growth and Sustainability?
    G20 and Global Development How can the new summit architecture promote pro-poor growth and sustainability? Thomas Fues / Peter Wolff (Editors) G20 and Global Development How can the new summit architecture promote pro-poor growth and sustainability? Thomas Fues / Peter Wolff (eds.) Bonn 2010 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) The German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) is a multidisciplinary research, consultancy and training institute for Germany’s bilateral and for multilateral development co-ope- ration. On the basis of independent research, it acts as consultant to public institutions in Germany and abroad on current issues of co-operation between developed and developing countries. Through its 9-months training course, the German Development Institute prepares German and European University graduates for a career in the field of development policy. Thomas Fues is head of the Training Department at the German Development Institute in Bonn. His main research interests are global governance, rising powers, United Nations and international development cooperation. E-mail: [email protected] Peter Wolff is head of the Department “World economy and development financing” at the German Development Institute in Bonn. His recent work focuses on the consequences of the global financial and economic crisis for the developing world and for global economic governance. E-mail: [email protected] © Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbH Tulpenfeld
    [Show full text]
  • Plans for the 2009 London G20 Summit
    Plans for the London G20 Summit 2009 Jenilee Guebert Senior Researcher, G20 Research Group February 21, 2009 Preface 2 7. Appendices 49 1. Introduction 2 G20 Leaders’ Experience for the April Summit 49 2. Agenda and Priorities 3 Members of G20, Gleneagles Dialogue and Major G20 Charter of Principles 7 Economies Meeting 50 International Cooperation 8 G20 Leaders’ Biographies 50 Bank Supervision 9 Statistical Profiles 55 Hedge Funds 11 Argentina 55 Regional Reserve Currencies 11 Australia 56 Export Credit 11 Brazil 57 Credit Cards 12 Canada 59 Unemployment 12 China 60 Reform of the International Financial Institutions13 France 62 Trade 15 Germany 63 Climate Change 17 India 65 Oil Prices and Energy 17 Indonesia 66 Working Groups 18 Italy 68 3. Participants 19 Japan 69 Sideline Meetings 22 Korea 70 4. Implementation and Preparations 24 Mexico 72 Implementation 24 Russia 73 Economic Performance 30 Saudi Arabia 75 Preparatory Meetings 30 South Africa 76 Preparations 30 Turkey 78 Site 44 United Kingdom 79 5. Future Meetings 45 United States 80 6. G20-G8 Relationship 46 European Union 82 7. Civil Society 47 G20 Research Group Preface This report on the “London Economic Summit: Plans for the Second Meeting” is compiled by the G20 Research Group largely from public sources as an aid to researchers and other stakeholders interested in the meetings of G20 leaders and their invited guests. It will be updated periodically as plans for the summit evolve. Note that this document refers to the first G20 leaders’ meeting (or summit), which took place on November 14- 15, 2008, in Washington DC (as opposed to the G20 finance ministers forum, which was founded in 1999, and other groupings such as the G20 developing countries formed in response to the agricultural negotiations at the World Trade Organization).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gleneagles Summit: NGO and Civil Society Perspectives on the G8
    Report The Gleneagles Summit NGO and Civil society Perspectives on the G8 August 2005 Karin Simonson Ottawa, Canada Programme on NGOs & Civil Society Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations Centre d'études pratiques de la négociation internationale The Gleneagles Summit Centre for Applied Studies in Karin Simonson, Research Associate, prepared this report for the Programme on International Negotiations NGOs and Civil Society of the Centre for Applied Studies in International C.P. 1340 Negotiation. Av. de la Paix 7 bis 1211 Geneva 1 The Programme on NGOs and Civil Society Switzerland Worldwide, the role of civil society has been increasing at rapid speed. Non- governmental organizations (NGOs) have become significant and influential T +41 22 730 8675/76 players and generate much interest. Created in 1986, the Programme on Non- F +41 22 730 8690 Governmental Organizations and Civil Society aims at contributing towards a [email protected] better understanding of NGOs and the solutions of complex and conflictive www.casin.ch societal problems involving NGOs. The opinions expressed in this paper reflect only those of the author and not of the institutions to which he/she is or was affiliated. Copyright CASIN © August 2005 1 The Gleneagles Summit Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HOTEL NEW OTANI TOKYO Your Best Choice for a Successful Event HOTEL NEW OTANI TOKYO
    HOTEL NEW OTANI TOKYO Your Best Choice for a Successful Event HOTEL NEW OTANI TOKYO NEW OTANI GARDEN TOWER NEW OTANI GARDEN COURT THE MAIN Hotel New Otani Tokyo opened in 1964 to welcome guests visiting our city for the 18th Olympic Games. Since then, it has led the hotel industry in our country, serving as the main venue for three G7 Summit meetings and welcoming dignitaries from around the world. With a diverse selection of guest rooms, 38 restaurants and bars, 33 banquet rooms, shopping arcades, and first-class service and hospitality, Hotel New Otani Tokyo offers the best platform to lead your event to success. At the time of opening in 1964 The 12th G7 Summit Meeting, 1986 Official Dinner, Princess Diana of UK Imperial Enthronement Ceremony, 1990 at the Enthronement Ceremony dinner JAPANESE GARDEN The hotel's 10-acre Japanese garden boasts a history of more than 400 years, and in the past has been the property of prominent samurai lords. Despite its location in the center of Tokyo, the garden's six-meter-high waterfall, koi pond, verdant trees and seasonal flowers offer a moment of serenity and repose to those who stroll its paths. The Japanese garden at Hotel New Otani Tokyo has ranked #8 on TripAdvisor's "Best Free Attractions in Japan" list of 2017 Facilities A multitude of shops, services and facilities enrich the guests' stay. The hotel complex is like a town in itself, with innumerous facilities and things to do The outdoor Garden Pool is the largest There are six medical/dental clinics Tea ceremony experience is available in The concierge desk provides support to hotel pool in central Tokyo and opens on-site, as well as two drug stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Study on the Environmental Assessment Of
    JOHN J. KIRTON CURRICULUM VITAE November 20, 2015 A. Biographical Information 1. Personal Home Address 91 Roe Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5M 2H6 [email protected] (416) 485-5011 University Address Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1 [email protected] (416) 946-8953 2. Degrees BA Political Science, University of Toronto, 1971 MA International Affairs, Carleton University, 1973 PhD International Studies, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, 1977. Thesis: “The Conduct and Co-ordination of Canadian Government Decision-Making Towards the United States,” Supervisor: Professor Roger Swanson. 3. Employment Full Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 2015- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 1982-2015 Appointment to Graduate School, 1983 Tenure awarded, 1982 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Economy, University of Toronto, 1977-82 Previous Academic Appointments Research Fellow, Institute of International Relations, University of British Columbia, 1976-77 4. Professional Affiliations and Activities Director, G8 Research Group, May 1987-Present Co-director, G20 Research Group, April 2008-Present Co-director, Global Health Diplomacy Program, October 2007-Present Co-director, BRICS Research Group, September 2011-Present Co-editor, Global Environmental Governance Series, Ashgate Publishing, 2001-Present Co-editor, Global Governance Series, Ashgate Publishing, 2014-Present Co-editor, Global Finance Series, Ashgate Publishing, 2002-2014 John J. Kirton Visiting Fellow, Balsillie School of International Affairs, September 1, 2012-June 30, 2013 Visiting Professor, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan, April 1-July 31, 2013 Non-resident Senior Fellow, Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China, October 1, 2013-present B.
    [Show full text]
  • 312-11 Harper Years 2014
    The Harper Years Lecture 11: POL 312Y Canadian Foreign Policy Copyright: Professor John Kirton, University of Toronto All rights reserved November 25, 2014 JFK mk Introduction On January 23, 2006, Canadians elected Stephen Harper’s Conservatives with a minority government of 124 seats, compared to 103 for Paul Martin’s Liberals, 51 for the separatist Bloc Québécois, and 29 for the New Democratic Party (NDP). The 46-year-old Torontonian-turned-Albertan was formally sworn in as Canada’s 22nd prime minister on February 6. A debate immediately arose about what Canadian foreign policy would now be (Kirton 2006, 2007). After Harper won a second, stronger minority government of 143 seats on October 14, 2008 and then a majority government of 166 seats on May 8, 2011, the debate continued, among six major competing schools of thought. The Debate The first school pointed, in authentic peripheral dependent (PD) fashion, to “restrained Americanism.” It predicted that Harper would seek a cooperative relationship with the U.S., limited only by Harper’s fragile minority position and absence of ideological partners in Parliament. Janice Stein forecast “greater affinity with U.S. positions internationally,” including a pro-American tilt on relations with the Middle East and the United Nations (McCarthy 2006). Joseph Jockel, Christopher Sands, David Biette, and Dwight Mason thought the tone and ease of the Canada-U.S. relationship would improve, as Harper made good on his defence promises. But they also felt that the Shamrock Summit–like closeness of Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan would be avoided, given Harper’s minority position at home (Koring 2006).
    [Show full text]