Fs -"/J Media Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fs - Ho 'fs -"/J Media Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns: AQualitative Look at David Duke's Political Career Henry C. Feng Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley institute OFGOVeiN STUDIES LIBSflf JUL 3 1 ]9{)5 yNi¥fcH«Siy OF CALiri Working Paper 95-13 IGS INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Media Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns: AQualitative Look at David Duke's Political Career Henry ^ong Institute of GoverninenfaLSTirdies, University of California, Berkeley Working Paper 95-13 Working Papers published by the Institute of Governmentol Studies provide quick dissemination of draft reports and papers, preliminary analysis, and papers with a limited audience. The ohjective is to assist authors in refining their ideas by circulating research results and to stimulate discussion about public policy. Working Papers are reproduced unedited directly from the author's pages. Media Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns: A Qualitative Look at David Duke's Political Career Henry C. Fong As acandidate for the Louisiana State the candidate rode a wave of Southern House in 1989, David Ernest Duke resentment, political cynicism, falling living certainly did not seem to live up to his image standards and social instability into political as a world-famous racist. office. But there is another question that On the surface. Duke looked every bit comes to mind: How didDavidDuke manage the friendly, reasonable boy-next-door: to secure an elected political office despite campaigning for a seat in the state legislature his reputation as the most visible racist in as a conservative Republican in a mostly white the United States? district, he appealed to voters who agreed Throughout most of his life. Duke had with his fmely-tuned platform of tax relief, never been one to hide his extremism; on the welfare reform, and an end to affirmative contrary, he had always deliberately and action programs. Although Duke's margin of publicly flaunted his bizarre beliefs and victory was tiny (he beat fellow Republican actions. He has worn swastika-emblazoned John Treen by a mere 227 votes in a runoff), Nazi uniforms, burned crosses as the Grand it was clear that Duke had aroused a white Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, sold blatantly working- and middle-class insurgency that anti-Semitic literature such as Hitler Was My resembled the populism ofthe Earl and Huey Friend,^ and advocated the geographic Long era in its antagonism towards elites and division of the United States into ethnic special interests.' There was no question that homelands i la South Africa.' Duke once ' Lawrence N. Powell, "ReadMy Liposuction: The Makeover of David Duke," New Republic, October 15, 1990. ^Jon Meacham, "Dukedumb: How a Lightweight Louisiana Racist Came to Spook a Nation," Washington Monthly, July- August, 1992. ' James Ridgeway, Bloodin the Face: TheKu Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, NaziSkinheads, and the Rise of a New White Culture, (New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1991), 150. Also see Tyler Bridges, "Working Together is Louisiana's Best Chance," NewOrleans Times-Picayune, October30, 1991. In this article. Duke says that his vision for the ideal structure of a racially mixed state is "like an apartheid, except more complete." Media Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns publicly stated that "Jews belong in the ashbin The Southern Context of history."'^ He was arrested twice for inciting riots and has presented a false military Although it is tempting to simply dismiss record. And to top off his list of outrageous Duke as yet another colorful example of behavior. Duke posed as a black militant when Louisiana's populist idiosyncrasy, this he penned a book instructing blacks how to explanation can only partially account for his "kill whitey," and he also posed as a woman emergence as a factor in American politics. when he wrote a sex manual entitled Finders Still, Duke is a complex product of his Keepers.^ abilities, his past, his character, and his Given his unusual past and racist beliefs, environment, and it can be argued that the very fact that Duke was able to mount a Louisiana's unique political setting serious political campaign for office is contributed greatly to Duke's electoral appeal. surprising. Any perceived misstep on the part Like every other native ofthe state, David of a political actor can spell electoral doom, Duke is a product of the social tensions and it is certainly safe to say that Duke's created in the aftermath of southern lifetime record of racism, extremism and desegregation. Certainly this post- demagoguery would have meant political desegregation era reflected a period of suicide for any other candidate. So the political growth, but at the same time, it also question remains: How is David Duke produced a new economic and racial different from other political aspirants in the instability in a society that had essentially American governmental system? How does a remained unchanged for almost two centuries. racist with a paper trail linking him to Nazis On the one hand, the newly booming urban and Klansmen get elected to political office South progressed quickly: blacks moved back in the United States? south, small-town southerners migrated to the Interestingly, David Duke's exploitation cities, and the cities themselves swelled with of white Southerners' economic and racial an influx of people, money, and services. But fears are not, in fact, the primarycontributor for the South, this rapid change was a to his emergence as a politician. In fact, there dramatic break with the past: as C. Vann are strong indications that Duke's electoral Woodward wrote, "The South suddenly success actually stemmed from his ability to entered a period filled with more shocks of manipulate the media and moderate his discontinuity than any period of its history. extremist image into one that is more Desegregation—the very catalyst of this era acceptable and appealing to mainstream of change—did not quite solve the South's voters. But even though he abandoned his already-fierce racial friction: white demagoguery and moderated his extremist southerners feared and resented image, his unwavering obsession with desegregational policy; to these individuals, advancing the cause of white supremacy the government was giving blacks free license eventually surfaced and derailed his political to usurp the whites' long-held social career. dominance and superior status. Capitalizing ' J. Michael Kennedy, "Duke's Talk of Piety May Further Erode Credibility," Los Angeles Times, November 14, 1991. 'Ridgeway 1991,146. Duke's book inciting blacks toviolence against whites was tvXxWtA African Atto and hisdating-and- sex guide was written under the pen name "Dorothy Vanderbilt." "Ferrel GuUIory, "David Duke inSouthern Context," The Emergence ofDavid Duke andthePolitics ofRace, ed. Douglas D. Rose (Chapel Hill; University of North Carolina Press, 1992), 2. POLITICA ♦ Spring 1995 on these fears, political candidates like Barry exploitation of economic fears and racial Goldwater and George Wallace targeted white tensions. In fact, during his few years of voters and called for resistance to what they greatest political achievement (1989 to 1991), saw as drastic measures produced by Duke's appeal had less to do with his reaction desegregation. White opposition over such to Louisianans' views than it had to do with policy issues fanned the flames of Southern voters' reactions to Duke's ever-changing racism. image. Southern economic stress and racial A large part of Duke's success in his friction also formed an important part of campaigns for the state legislature, U.S. Louisiana's recent history. Pollsters found Senate, and Louisiana governor was due to that white Louisianans had an overwhelming his ability to manipulate the media—especially desire to protect the middle class and its television—and thus publicly transform his values.^ As economic stagnation proceeded image from that of an extremist bigot to that to set in, voters began to feel that their of a moderate, mainstream politician. Duke government no longer cared about middle understood that in order to extend his appeal class needs. The sluggish economy led to a and influence politically, he had to somehow quiet depression that crushed Louisianans' escape his outrageous past, and he set about hopes for financial stability and led to even to do so in expert fashion: the new David greater frustration and resentment. Racial Duke soon sported toned-down rhetoric, strife continued as black-white friction in the coded political jargon and an amazingly post-desegregation years produced "mediagenic"' affinity for television controversies over jobs, schools, and housing. coverage. But upon closer inspection, it is Large differences in the living conditions and clear that Duke never wavered from his socioeconomic status of blacks and whites set extremist agenda and beliefs. And although the stage for caustic and prolonged racial he successfully moderated his public image conflicts.* Southern socioeconomic instability in order to win mainstream approval on a surrounded David Duke as he grew up in local level. Duke's extremist past and Louisiana, and he later used his knowledge unwavering racism ultimately could not of this particular environment to his political escape the eyes of a larger electorate. advantage. He knew that by exploiting the fears and hostilities of a large white voting base, he could potentially garner an A Personal Profile impressive amount of initial support. But Duke is more than just another David Duke's past is characterized by product of Louisiana's special brew of Huey deliberate and demagogic racism. He has lived Long populism: while he did manage to tap his life on the extreme fringes of the racial into the frustration and resentment of right, and for most of his life, he has Louisiana's white middle class in his various extensively publicized his racist beliefs. And campaigns for office. Duke's emergence as a though he already enjoyed the support of politician owed its success to more than an fellow hardcore racists who could not care ' Guillory 1992, 6.
Recommended publications
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 KLÀNNISHNESS AND THE KU KLUX KLAN: THE RHETORIC AND ETHICS OF GENRE THEORY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Robert McGee, B.S., M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BLACK MARKET for SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION NATO Stratcom COE Singularex
    COUNTERING THE MALICIOUS USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA THE BLACK MARKET FOR SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION NATO StratCom COE Singularex ISBN 978-9934-564-31-4 ISBN: 978-9934-564-31-4 Authors: NATO StratCom COE Research: Singularex Project manager: Sebastian Bay Text editor: Anna Reynolds Design: Kārlis Ulmanis Riga, November 2018 NATO STRATCOM COE 11b Kalciema iela Riga LV1048, Latvia www.stratcomcoe.org Facebook/stratcomcoe Twitter: @stratcomcoe Singularex is a Social Media Intelligence and Analytics company based in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Website: www.singularex.com Email: [email protected] This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of NATO StratCom COE. NATO StratCom COE does not take responsibility for the views of authors expressed in their articles. Social media manipulation is undermining democracy, but it is also slowly undermining the social media business model. Introduction Around the turn of the decade, when the popularity of social media sites was really beginning to take off, few people noticed a secretly burgeoning trend — some users were artificially inflating the number of followers they had on social media to reap financial benefits. Even fewer noticed that organisations such as the Internet Research Agency were exploiting these new techniques for political gain. Only when this innovation in information warfare was deployed against Ukraine in 2014 did the world finally become aware of a practice that has now exploded into federal indictments,1 congressional hearings,2 and a European Union Code of Practice on Disinformation.3 At the heart of this practice, weaponised by states and opportunists alike, is a flourishing black market where buyers and sellers meet to trade in clicks, likes, and shares.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • “Watchdogging” Versus Adversarial Journalism by State-Owned Media: the Nigerian and Cameroonian Experience Endong Floribert Patrick C
    International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science (IJELS) Vol-2, Issue-2, Mar-Apr- 2017 ISSN: 2456-7620 “Watchdogging” Versus Adversarial Journalism by State-Owned Media: The Nigerian and Cameroonian Experience Endong Floribert Patrick C. Department of Theatre and Media Studies, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria Abstract— The private and the opposition-controlled environment where totalitarianism, dictatorship and other media have most often been taxed by Black African forms of unjust socio-political strictures reign. They are governments with being adepts of adversarial journalism. not to be intimidated or cowed by any aggressive force, to This accusation has been predicated on the observation kill stories of political actions which are inimical to public that the private media have, these last decades, tended to interest. They are rather expected to sensitize and educate dogmatically interpret their watchdog role as being an masses on sensitive socio-political issues thereby igniting enemy of government. Their adversarial inclination has the public and making it sufficiently equipped to make made them to “intuitively” suspect government and to solid developmental decisions. They are equally to play view government policies as schemes that are hardly – the role of an activist and strongly campaign for reforms nay never – designed in good faith. Based on empirical that will bring about positive socio-political revolutions in understandings, observations and secondary sources, this the society. Still as watchdogs and sentinels, the media paper argues that the same accusation may be made are expected to practice journalism in a mode that will against most Black African governments which have promote positive values and defend the interest of the overly converted the state-owned media to their public totality of social denominations co-existing in the country relation tools and as well as an arsenal to lambaste their in which they operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms
    A report from the Center on Technology and Society OCT 2018 Computational Propaganda, Jewish-Americans and the 2018 Midterms: The Amplification of Anti-Semitic Harassment Online Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all. ABOUT CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY AND THE BELFER FELLOWS In a world riddled with cyberhate, online harassment, and misuses of ADL (Anti-Defamation technology, the Center for Technology & Society (CTS) serves as a resource League) fights anti-Semitism to tech platforms and develops proactive solutions. Launched in 2017 and and promotes justice for all. headquartered in Silicon Valley, CTS aims for global impacts and applications in an increasingly borderless space. It is a force for innovation, producing Join ADL to give a voice to cutting-edge research to enable online civility, protect vulnerable populations, those without one and to support digital citizenship, and engage youth. CTS builds on ADL’s century of protect our civil rights. experience building a world without hate and supplies the tools to make that a possibility both online and off-line. Learn more: adl.org The Belfer Fellowship program supports CTS’s efforts to create innovative solutions to counter online hate and ensure justice and fair treatment for all in the digital age through fellowships in research and outreach projects. The program is made possible by a generous contribution from the Robert A. and Renée E. Belfer Family Foundation. The inaugural 2018-2019 Fellows are: • Rev. Dr. Patricia Novick, Ph.D., of the Multicultural Leadership Academy, a program that brings Latino and African-American leaders together.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Manipulation 2020 How Social Media Companies Are Failing to Combat Inauthentic Behaviour Online
    978-9934-564-92-5 SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION 2020 HOW SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES ARE FAILING TO COMBAT INAUTHENTIC BEHAVIOUR ONLINE PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ISBN: 978-9934-564-92-5 Project Manager: Rolf Fredheim Authors: Sebastian Bay, Anton Dek, Iryna Dek, Rolf Fredheim Research: Singularex Copy Editing: Anna Reynolds Design: Kārlis Ulmanis This report was completed in November 2020, based on an experiment that was conducted September to October 2020. Singularex is a Social Media Intelligence and Analytics company based in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Website: www.singularex.com Email: [email protected] NATO STRATCOM COE 11b Kalnciema Iela Riga LV1048, Latvia www.stratcomcoe.org Facebook/stratcomcoe Twitter @stratcomcoe This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The experiment Antagonists, from foreign governments to To test the ability of social media compa- terror groups, anti-democratic groups, and nies to identify and remove manipulation, commercial companies, continually seek to we bought engagement on thirty-nine Face- manipulate public debate through the use of book, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok coordinated social media manipulation cam- posts, using three high-quality Russian social paigns. These groups rely on fake accounts media manipulation service providers. For and inauthentic behaviour to undermine on- 300 € we received inauthentic engagement in line conversations, causing online and offline the form of 1 150 comments, 9 690 likes, 323 harm to both society and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS
    Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................... 1 What Techniques Do Media Manipulators Use? ....... 33 Understanding Media Manipulation ............................ 2 Participatory Culture ........................................... 33 Who is Manipulating the Media? ................................. 4 Networks ............................................................. 34 Internet Trolls ......................................................... 4 Memes ................................................................. 35 Gamergaters .......................................................... 7 Bots ...................................................................... 36 Hate Groups and Ideologues ............................... 9 Strategic Amplification and Framing ................. 38 The Alt-Right ................................................... 9 Why is the Media Vulnerable? .................................... 40 The Manosphere .......................................... 13 Lack of Trust in Media ......................................... 40 Conspiracy Theorists ........................................... 17 Decline of Local News ........................................ 41 Influencers............................................................ 20 The Attention Economy ...................................... 42 Hyper-Partisan News Outlets ............................. 21 What are the Outcomes? ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy
    E-PAPER A Companion to Democracy #3 Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy LEJLA TURCILO AND MLADEN OBRENOVIC A Publication of Heinrich Böll Foundation, August 2020 Preface to the e-paper series “A Companion to Democracy” Democracy is multifaceted, adaptable – and must constantly meet new challenges. Democratic systems are influenced by the historical and social context, by a country’s geopolitical circumstances, by the political climate and by the interaction between institutions and actors. But democracy cannot be taken for granted. It has to be fought for, revitalised and renewed. There are a number of trends and challenges that affect democracy and democratisation. Some, like autocratisation, corruption, the delegitimisation of democratic institutions, the shrinking space for civil society or the dissemination of misleading and erroneous information, such as fake news, can shake democracy to its core. Others like human rights, active civil society engagement and accountability strengthen its foundations and develop alongside it. The e-paper series “A Companion to Democracy” examines pressing trends and challenges facing the world and analyses how they impact democracy and democratisation. Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy 2/ 38 Misinformation, Disinformation, Malinformation: Causes, Trends, and Their Influence on Democracy 3 Lejla Turcilo and Mladen Obrenovic Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical origins of misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation 5 3. Information disorder – key concepts and definitions 7 3.1. Fake news – definitions, motives, forms 7 3.2. Disinformation, misinformation, malinformation 8 4. Distortion of truth and manipulation of consent 12 5. Democracy at risk in post-truth society – how misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation destroy democratic values 17 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Events at Octavia Books
    THE CTAVIAN Voted Best Octavia Books’ bi-monthly newsletter for booklovers Locally Owned Bookstore February / Ma rch 2 017 Books to Curl Up With Norse Mythology The Sleepwalker OCTAVIA BOOKS by Neil Gaiman by Chris Bohjalian In Norse Mythology, Neil When Annalee Ahlberg 513 Octavia Street Gaiman fashions the goes missing, her chil- New Orleans, LA 70115 primeval stories of the dren fear the worst. 504-899-READ (7323) Norse pantheon into a Annalee is a sleepwalker octaviabooks.com novelistic arc that begins whose affliction manifests [email protected] with the genesis of the nine in ways both bizarre and worlds and delves into the devastating. Once, she STORE HOURS exploits of deities, dwarfs, destroyed the hydrangeas Open 10 am - 6 pm and giants. Take Thor, who in front of her Vermont disguises himself as a woman home. More terrifying was Monday - Saturday to recover his hammer. Or Kvasir, whose blood is turned the night her daughter Lianna pulled her back from the Sunday 10 am - 5 pm into a mead that infuses drinkers with poetry. The work edge of the Gale River bridge. When the police discover culminates in Ragnarok, the twilight of the gods and a scrap of nightshirt hanging on a tree, it seems certain rebirth of a new time and people. Through Gaiman’s witty Annalee is dead. But detective Gavin Rikert continues to prose emerge these gods with their competitive natures, call. As Lianna investigates Annalee’s disappearance, she their susceptibility to being duped and to duping others, finds herself drawn to Gavin, but she must ask herself: and their passion, making these long-ago myths breathe Why does the detective know so much about her mother? pungent life again.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Focused Research on Coercion, Deception and Manipulation in Persuasive Use of Social Media
    The Need for Focused Research on Coercion, Deception and Manipulation in Persuasive Use of Social Media Casper Justesen Bech[0000-0002-0565-5087] Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark [email protected] 1 Introduction Persuasive technologies are increasingly being scrutinized for practices and usage in- volving coercion, deception and manipulation [1]. In particular, among the most dom- inant social media industry platforms, these threats are increasingly becoming a grow- ing matter of concern. The emerging trend of hybrid warfare [2] [3], the Cambridge Analytica scandal [4] and the 2016 United States presidential election [5] has all brought these issues worldwide attention. The challenges and threats involved are com- plex and the involved platforms are closed source and highly secretive concerning their practices. However, the persuasive design community in general has been reluctant to engage in this area of research. It is becoming increasingly clear, that these threats are of great importance to end-users and possibly democracy itself [6]. Clearly, the per- suasive technology research community can offer important socio-technical insights, which can contribute to a better understanding of how users are being deceived. The aim of the poster is to showcase the current state of research into coercive and deceptive practices from a persuasive technology perspective and propose directions for further research. This could lead to a better understanding of how users of social media are being coerced, deceived and manipulated. Contributing to improved information liter- acy, strengthening our defenses against these threats. 2 Method Based on an unreleased systematic literature review, the current state of research into coercion, deception and manipulation within persuasive technology as a field is pre- sented.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media, Manipulation, and Violence
    South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business Volume 15 Issue 2 Spring Article 7 2019 Social Media, Manipulation, and Violence Allyson Haynes Stuart Charleston School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scjilb Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Communications Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Stuart, Allyson Haynes (2019) "Social Media, Manipulation, and Violence," South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business: Vol. 15 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scjilb/vol15/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOCIAL MEDIA, MANIPULATION, AND VIOLENCE Allyson Haynes Stuart∗ For centuries now, inventions heralded as advances in human progress have been exploited by the criminal mind. New technologies, all too soon, can become instruments used to commit serious crimes. The railroad is one example . and the telephone another . So, it will be with the Internet and social media.1 Many of us lament the ubiquity of social media2 and the attention it takes from face-to-face activities, ∗ Allyson Haynes Stuart is a Professor of Law at Charleston School of Law. She wishes to thank her research assistant, Michael Grabara, and the editorial staff of the South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business. This article follows the 2018 Symposium, "Innovation, Policy, & Technology in Law and Development," where Allyson Haynes Stuart was a featured panelist.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    Policy brief Dismiss, Distort, Distract, and Dismay: Continuityæ and Change in Russian Disinformation Issue 2016/13• May 2016 by Jon White Russian disinformation is not new. It demonstrates Context and importance more continuity than change from its Soviet Russian disinformation has generated considerable interest over the last decade, and antecedents. The most significant changes are the lack especially since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. NATO Commander General Philip of a universal ideology and the evolution of means Breedlove said that Russia today is waging “the most amazing information warfare of delivery. Putin’s Russkii mir (Russian World) is blitzkrieg we have ever seen in the history of information warfare.”1 not as universal in its appeal as Soviet communism Despite General Breedlove’s assertion, continuity rather than change characterises was. On the other hand, Russia has updated how it Russia’s current disinformation operations. The German webpage, Deutsche Welle, disseminates its disinformation. The Soviet experience noted the recent Russian propaganda push is “reminiscent of the Cold War KGB efforts.”2 Anton Nosik, a popular Russian blogger, says, “the Kremlin is falling back with disinformation can be divided into two theatres: on a time-honoured strategy in its propaganda war.”3 Russian observer Maria offensive disinformation, which sought to influence Snegovaya says that current Russian information warfare is “fundamentally based decision-makers and public opinion abroad and on older, well-developed and documented Soviet techniques.”4 Emphasising the Soviet roots of today’s Russian disinformation, Snegovaya argues that “the novelty defensive, which sought to influence Soviet citizens. of Russia’s information warfare is overestimated.”5 This study will examine Soviet offensive and defensive disinformation and compare it to Russian offensive and defensive disinformation.
    [Show full text]