DOCSLIB.ORG

The Timeless Litigator

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Timeless Litigator by Jerold S. Solovy and Robert L. Hyman In the early 1990s, a young sportswriter interviewed Stan How about the greatest tenor? Pavarotti? Caruso? Lanza? "The Man" Musial. What about the greatest architect? Skidmore? Wright? I.M. "Stan," began the reporter, "a lot has been said about Pei? The greatest physician? Salk? DeBaky? today's pitching versus the pitching in the '40s and '50s Step right up and offer your nominations. In almost any when you were an active player. What do you think? How field of endeavor, the choices are abundant. Lots of individ­ would you do against today's pitching?" uals could legitimately be nominated as the "greatest"-and Stan thought a moment and replied, "I have to be honest we find them throughout the century. with you. I probably couldn't bat much better than .200." Now name the greatest trial lawyer of the century. Start "Two-hundred!?" The reporter was incredulous. "Stan, with the candidates who are still practicing. Okay, that you were an all-star in every one of your 22 years in the would be .... Major Leagues. You hit 475 homers. You had more than Johnnie Cochran? Roy Black? Mike Tigar? F. Lee Bailey? 3,600 hits. Your lifetime batting average was .331. You won Gerry Spence? They are all good lawyers, to be sure. Suc­ seven National League batting titles. Do you really think you cessful lawyers, without doubt. Well known, without ques­ could bat only .200 against today's pitching?" tion. Maybe even great. But the "greatest of the century"? "Son, you gotta remember," the Man replied, "I'm over 70 Not a chance. That title is reserved for someone else. now." Is there any question that the greatest litigator of our cen­ Forget about Y2K. You and your computers will survive tury-of any century-was Clarence Darrow? Can you even it. It is the nostalgia bug that may do us all in. As we think of another legitimate nomination? Could you, someone approach the end of a century and a millennium, we are who spends her life in the courts observing other lawyers, going to need rearview mirrors on our reading glasses to deal seriously nominate anyone else? with all the times we will be asked to look back. In sports, Sure, you have seen some really good trial lawyers. You politics, theater, art-in every aspect of life-someone will have seen lawyers with great skills. You have seen lawyers ask whether things were better in the old days. As trial who were involved in great cases. You have seen all these lawyers, we are not immune. things-but rarely at the same time and even more rarely Quick-name the greatest baseball player of the century. over and over again. Did you say Babe Ruth? Probably. But if you are reading this Darrow was unique. He was a great lawyer. He had great in St. Louis, you may have said Musial or even McGwire. skills. And he had great cases-over and over again. And some may argue for Gehrig or Williams or Aaron or During the past hundred years, the press has dubbed at Mays or Rose or Cobb or DiMaggio or Griffey-any one of least a dozen cases "The Trial of the Century." Earlier this them comes to mind as a possible candidate. year, MSNBC asked the public to cast votes. There are a full Now name the greatest basketball player. Recent history score of legitimate contenders for the "greatest trial" title: suggests that there is Jordan and there is everyone else. But 1901 Leon Czolgosz (murder; the President fans of Chamberlain or Russell or Cousy or Bird or Magic McKinley assassination) might give you an argument. 1906 Harry Thaw (murder; starlet Evelyn Nesbitt's Who was the greatest boxer? Ali? He was "The Greatest," husband, charged with killing her lover, but then he named himself. What about Dempsey or Louis or architect Sanford White) Marciano? The greatest golfer? Nicklaus? Palmer? Jones? Woods? 1907 Big Bill Haywood (murder; union leader Hockey player? Gretzky? Orr? Howe? charged with bombing death of Idaho Gov­ ernor) Jerold S. Solovy and Robert L. Byman are partners in the Chicago law 1911 The Triangle Shirtwaist Trial (manslaughter; firm of Jenner & Block. sweatshop fire resulting in death of 146 people) LITIGATION Falll999 12 Volume 26 Number I 1911 The McNamara Brothers Trial (arson, murder; On December 30, 1905, a bomb blast killed Stuenenberg. union leaders charged with bombing deaths) Two days later, the police arrested Harry Orchard, who 1921 Sacco & Vanzetti (murder; defendants promptly confessed to setting the bomb-under direct unpopular anarchists) instructions, he claimed, from Haywood. Many credited Darrow's brilliant closing argument for Haywood's acquit­ 1921 Fatty Arbuckle (manslaughter; popular actor tal; others assigned the judge's unexpectedly favorable charged with rape/manslaughter in alleged instructions. No matter. Darrow either persuaded the jury to drunken attack) acquit, or he persuaded the judge to give good instructions. 1924 Leopold & Loeb (murder; "thrill" crime) A home run. Darrow is batting 1.000. 1925 The Scopes "Monkey" Trial (teaching evolu­ tion in violation of state law) *** Leopold and Loeb were brilliant. They were rich. They 1931 The Scottsboro Boys (rape; nine black men were lovers. But they were bored. At the age of 18, Loeb was accused of raping two white women) the youngest person ever to have graduated from the Uni­ 1934 The Gloria Vanderbilt Custody Trial versity of Michigan and was a post-graduate student at the 1935 Bruno Hauptmann (murder/kidnapping; The University of Chicago. Leopold, 19, was in law school at the Lindbergh Baby) same university. They were, they reasoned, so smart and so 1946 The Nuremberg Trials privileged that ordinary laws did not apply to them. 1951 The Rosenbergs (espionage; theft of atomic To prove the proposition, they conspired to commit the secrets) perfect murder. They chose as their victim and coldly mur­ 1954/1966 Sam Sheppard (murder; inspiration for The dered Loeb's 14-year old cousin, Bobby Franks. But Fugitive) Leopold was not as smart as he thought; he left a pair of 1969 The "Chicago Seven" (incitement to riot; glasses with Franks's body. The two soon confessed. anti-war protests) The defendants-rich, arrogant, Jewish, gay-were not exactly sympathetic characters. The only question appeared Charles Manson (murder; Helter-Skelter) 1970 to be how quickly the gallows could be built. But for a fee of 1992 The Rodney King Beating Trial (assault; $100,000 (more than a million in today's dollars), Darrow set videotaped police misconduct) out to save them. And save them he did. First, he withdrew 1995 O.J. Simpson (murder; you know ...) the not guilty pleas, taking the case from the jury; then he got 1999 The Clinton Impeachment Trial (felony stu­ right to the point and asked the judge for leave to offer evi­ pidity) dence of mitigation. With a battery of expert psychiatric tes- For those that occurred in our lifetimes, we can name most of the lead lawyers because the trials were so highly publi­ cized. You probably remember David Kendall, Johnnie Cochran, Marsha Clark, Vincent Bugliosi, William Kunstler, and F. Lee Bailey. But how about the lawyers in those other famous cases? Do the names Delphin Delmas, Fred Moore, or Gavin McNab come trippingly to the tongue? Probably not. And generations of lawyers yet unborn will probably not recognize the names of Kendall or Cochran 50 years from now. But one name will be remembered--Clarence Darrow. It is a staggering feat that of these 20 "Trials of the Cen­ tury" only two lawyers appeared in more than one of the cases. F. Lee Bailey was Sam Sheppard's lawyer in the 1966 trial that acquitted the "Fugitive" doctor; and Bailey played an important-albeit supporting-role in the O.J. Simpson defense. But Clarence Darrow was lead counsel in an amaz­ ing four (or maybe six, depending upon how you count) tri­ als of the century. No other lawyer has ever been so centrally involved in so many compelling cases. And so we ask the young sports­ writer's question: "How would Darrow fare in today's jus­ tice system?" First, take a look at Darrow's batting average in trials of the century. Big Bill Haywood was an executive of the Western Feder­ ation of Miners and was one of the labor movement's recog­ nized radicals; he publicly advocated violence in the cause of workers' rights. In the early years of the century, the Gover­ nor of Idaho, Frank Stuenenberg, called in Federal troops, suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and used heavy­ handed, and perhaps illegal, tactics to crush the union and its strike attempts. Haywood vowed vengeance. LITIGATION Falll99913 Volume 26 Number 1 timony and a two-day summation, Darrow literally saved his as in six years or in 6,000,000 years or in clients' necks. His clients pled guilty-score that as an out, 600,000,000 years. I do not think it important but give Darrow a sacrifice. Not an official time at bat, Dar­ whether we believe one or the other. row's average still stands at 1.000. Q. Do you think those were literal days? *** A. My impression is they were periods, but I would not Before OJ. and Monica, not many would have gone fur- attempt to argue as against anybody who wanted to ther than the Scopes "Monkey" Trial as their pick for the trial believe in literal days. of century. It had it all. The two most famous orators of the Darrow lost.
Recommended publications
  • Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy a Civil Judgment? Hastings H

    Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy a Civil Judgment? Hastings H

    Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 4 October 2007 Squeezing "The uiceJ ": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment? Hastings H. Beard University of Georgia School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Hastings H. Beard, Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment?, 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 143 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol15/iss1/4 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beard: Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Sati NOTES SQUEEZING "THEJUICE": CAN THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY BE USED TO SATISFY A CIVIL JUDGMENT? TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 144 II. BACKGROUND ............................................ 147 A. THE ORIGIN OF THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY .................... 148 B. THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AS A PROPERTY RIGHT ............... 151 1. Significance of the ProperyLabel in Legal Contexts .............. 151 2. Assignabiliy of the Right of Publiciy ........................ 154 C. TREATMENT OF OTHER FORMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: COMPETING INTERESTS .................................. 157 D. PRINCIPLES OF TORT LAW ................................. 159 1. Function of the Law of Torts ............................... 159 2. Poliy Considerations .................................... 160 III. D ISCUSSION ..............................................
  • Wagner Review 2.Pdf

    Wagner Review 2.Pdf

    1 IN THE COURTROOM WITH ROBERT WAGNER by David W. Mantik, MD, PhD The Mantik View February 18, 2018 Revised August 27, 2018 NOTE: This is my second review of Wagner’s 2016 book; the first was dated December 4, 2017.1 My first review, and Wagner’s response to it, can be found at my website: http://themantikview.com/ 2 § Dr. Mantik states: “It is unique for me to write a second review, but too much remained unsaid after the first review. Wagner’s book clearly required more attention, especially since his profound mistakes are so often duplicated by the unenlightened mainstream media.” § “German judges, very respectable people, who rolled the dice before sentencing, issued sentences 50% longer when the dice showed a high number, without being conscious of it.” -The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (2010), Nassim Nicholas Taleb § “If logic and reason, the hard, cold products of the mind, can be relied upon to deliver justice or produce the truth, how is it that these brain-heavy judges rarely agree? Five-to- four decisions are the rule, not the exception. Nearly half of the court must be unjust and wrong nearly half of the time. Each decision, whether the majority or minority, exudes logic and reason like the obfuscating ink from a jellyfish, and in language as opaque. The minority could have as easily become the decision of the court. At once we realize that logic, no matter how pretty and neat, that reason, no matter how seemingly profound and deep, does not necessarily produce truth, much less justice.
  • 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn from the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler

    10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn from the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler

    4/12/2017 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn From the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler OJ murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman • Murders: June 12, 1994 • Brentwood, L.A. • Arrested: June 17, 1994 • Arraignment: June 20, 1994 • Verdict: October 3, 1995 1 4/12/2017 5 “killer” pieces of physical evidence • Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson’s blood in OJ’s Bronco • OJ’s blood at the Bundy crime scene • Bloody glove at Bundy and the bloody glove at OJ’s house • Bloody footprints at scene matching bloody footprint in OJ’s Bronco • Trace evidence – hair and fiber evidence linking OJ to crime scene and Goldman Goldman’s blood in the Bronco • The Bronco was locked and was not accessed until the tow yard • LAPD detectives asked Kato if he had spare keys the morning after the murders • Mark Furhman was never in the Bronco (mistake spare tire testimony) 2 4/12/2017 OJ’s blood at Bundy • OJ’s blood drops next to bloody Bruno Magli size-12 shoe print (1 in 170 million) • OJ’s blood on back gate (1 in 58 billion!) • Phil Vanatter planted it on the gate? Bloody gloves • Aris XL cashmere-lined gloves (less than 200 pair sold exclusively by Bloomingdales) (unavailable west of Chicago) • Receipt for identical gloves purchased by Nicole Brown Simpson in December 1990 (and photos of OJ wearing those gloves) • Left glove found at Bundy crime scene and right glove found by Mark Fuhrman • Blood and hair of victims and Simpson found on gloves • How did Mark Fuhrman get lucky and plant a glove that OJ wore? How did Fuhrman get OJ’s blood unless
  • Last Chance, Dec. 9-10: an Opportunity to Learn from Exceptional National and Louisiana Attorneys

    Last Chance, Dec. 9-10: an Opportunity to Learn from Exceptional National and Louisiana Attorneys

    LOUISIANA ADVOCATES • October 2010 PAGE 13 Last Chance, Dec. 9-10: an opportunity to learn from exceptional national and Louisiana attorneys LAJ’s “Last Chance CLE Conference” where he was named the Dr. Dale E. Gold which has benefited our clients and has a well-deserved reputation for being Bennett Professor of Law and was hon- brought us tremendous satisfaction, Louisiana’s ultimate CLE experience. ored six times by the students as the Paul Gold of the Aversano & Gold success, and pride.” This year’s program, December 9-10, Outstanding LSU Professor. law firm says his Last Chance presenta- Gold adds, “I became a lawyer to pro- 2010, at the Hilton New Orleans River- He joined Colby-Sawyer College as its tion, “I’m vide an effective voice to those who side Hotel, features extraordinary attor- eighth president and a professor in the Melting,” deals might not otherwise have it. While I neys who will present twenty-four Humanities Department in August 2006. with “tactical and respect power, I think there always needs dynamic credit courses. Before being selected as the college’s strategic procedu- to be a counterbalance to equalize it. I Four of the conference’s speakers — president, he served as dean and profes- ral considerations believe that as a trial attorney I provide Paul Luvera Jr., Mount Vernon, Wash.; sor of law at the University of for anticipating this counterbalance for my clients who Joseph H. Lowe IV, Long Beach, Calif.; Tennessee College of Law in Knoxville, and dealing with otherwise might not be afforded within Nicholas Rowley, Decorah, Iowa; and Tenn.
  • 100 Facts About Rosa Parks on Her 100Th Birthday

    100 Facts About Rosa Parks on Her 100Th Birthday

    100 Facts About Rosa Parks On Her 100th Birthday By Frank Hagler SHARE Feb. 4, 2013 On February 4 we will celebrate the centennial birthday of Rosa Parks. In honor of her birthday here is a list of 100 facts about her life. 1. Rosa Parks was born on Feb 4, 1913 in Tuskegee, Alabama. ADVERTISEMENT Do This To Fix Car Scratches This car gadget magically removes scratches and scuffs from your car quickly and easily. trynanosparkle.com 2. She was of African, Cherokee-Creek, and Scots-Irish ancestry. FEATURED VIDEOS Powered by Sen Gillibrand reveals why she's so tough on Al Franken | Mic 2020 NOW PLAYING 10 Sec 3. Her mother, Leona, was a teacher. 4. Her father, James McCauley, was a carpenter. 5. She was a member of the African Methodist Episcopal church. 6. She attended the Industrial School for Girls in Montgomery. 7. She attended the Alabama State Teachers College for Negroes for secondary education. 8. She completed high school in 1933 at the age of 20. 9. She married Raymond Parker, a barber in 1932. 10. Her husband Raymond joined the NAACP in 1932 and helped to raise funds for the Scottsboro boys. 11. She had no children. 12. She had one brother, Sylvester. 13. It took her three tries to register to vote in Jim Crow Alabama. 14. She began work as a secretary in the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP in 1943. 15. In 1944 she briefly worked at Maxwell Air Force Base, her first experience with integrated services. 16. One of her jobs within the NAACP was as an investigator and activist against sexual assaults on black women.
  • Of Murder and Madness. by Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc

    Of Murder and Madness. by Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc

    Land & Water Law Review Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 18 1984 Of Murder and Madness. By Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc. 1983. Pp 1, 463. $17.95. Gerald M. Gallivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water Recommended Citation Gallivan, Gerald M. (1984) "Of Murder and Madness. By Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc. 1983. Pp 1, 463. $17.95.," Land & Water Law Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , pp. 313 - 317. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water/vol19/iss1/18 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Land & Water Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Gallivan: Of Murder and Madness. By Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc. 1 BOOK REVIEW OF MURDER AND MADNESS. By Gerry Spence. Doubleday Company, Inc., 1983. Pp.1, 463. $17.96. Reviewed by Gerald M. Gallivan* Gerry Spence has done it again! He has followed the extremely readable Gunning for Justice1 with Of Murder and Madness, perhaps even more gripping and better constructed. While the first book was built principally around the Hopkinson capital punishment case, the Silkwood nuclear energy case and the Cantrell self defense case, Of Murder and Madness deals solely with the Esquibel murder case and the insanity defense. "Solely" is not entirely accurate, for a large part of this book is autobiographical, as was the first. Indeed, many of the incidents recounted in the first book are retold here. This is not to level a charge of repetitiveness against the author, because in each book the events play a substantive but different part.
  • OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Cataloging Still in Progress

    OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Cataloging Still in Progress

    OJ SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL O.J. Simpson "Bronco Chase" audio CD (full transcript can be seen here) OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Collection (each disc is roughly 4 hours) Two hundred 4 hr. DVD's, professionally edited (100% commercial free) - contains virtually every minute of testimony. Recorded from local L.A. television stations, live as the events unfolded. Coverage begins with reports of the murders, till weeks after the verdict - and beyond. "O.J. Simpson - The Whole Story (and then some)" legend: "break" = fade to black, edited commercial break "H/C" = Hard Copy "ET" = Entertainment Tonight * To purchase, or inquire about OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD duplications, click here * * To download a .pdf file of this OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD listing, click here (322 KB) * OJ TRIAL #001 DVD (3:53:00) * News reports of the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman (ABC News, FX) * OJ waiting in truck outside of his house (@ 0:01:10) * Taped earlier: end of freeway chase, to Parker Center, news reports (@ 0:50:00) * Gil Garcetti, Commander Gascon: recap of charges (@ 1:36:48) * OJ's mug shot released on 11 o'clock news (@ 2:23:00), recap of days events * Johnnie Cochran, Al Michaels on "NightLine" (@ 2:51:00) * KNBC Morning News recap of events (@ 2:58:00) * Criminal Courts Bldg. Pre-Trial Preliminary Hearing, KNBC - Judge Kathleen Kennedy-Powell (@ 3:02:00) * Michele Kestler - LAPD Crime Lab (@ 3:18:00), cross-examination (@ 3:49:00), recess (@ 3:52:00) * KNBC news-break. OJ TRIAL #002 DVD (3:58:45) * Live evidence search KNBC news * Michele Kestler cross-examination cont.
  • A Panel Discussion on a Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators

    A Panel Discussion on a Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators

    Mercer Law Review Volume 50 Number 3 A Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Article 3 Commentators: A Symposium 5-1999 A Panel Discussion on a Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation (1999) "A Panel Discussion on a Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 50 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol50/iss3/3 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Panel Discussion on a Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators DEAN DESSEM: Good morning. I'm Larry Dessem, Dean of the Walter F. George School of Law of Mercer University. My job this morning is to welcome you to the historic Douglass Theatre, and to this year's Symposium sponsored by the law school and the Mercer Law Review, concerning "A Proposed Code of Ethics for Legal Commentators." The Mercer Law Review is the oldest law review in Georgia. The legal profession is unique in that our professional journals, the law reviews, are produced by our senior students. The bench and the bar and the law schools rely upon our students to edit and write and produce the law reviews that both chronicle and guide the path of the law.
  • A Jury Tampering Loophole

    A Jury Tampering Loophole

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St. John's University School of Law Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 15 Issue 3 Volume 15, Spring 2001, Issue 3 Article 12 March 2001 Post-Trial Jury Payoffs: A Jury Tampering Loophole Erica Summer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred Recommended Citation Summer, Erica (2001) "Post-Trial Jury Payoffs: A Jury Tampering Loophole," Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development: Vol. 15 : Iss. 3 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred/vol15/iss3/12 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POST-TRIAL JURY PAYOFFS: A JURY TAMPERING LOOPHOLE* I. INTRODUCTION Any attempt to corrupt or influence a jury for the purpose of manipulating a determination by any means other than presenting evidence or argument in court does not fall within the meaning of the term jury tampering.1 Although this statement may seem counterintuitive, surprisingly, in New York State, the statement is technically correct. The notion of a trial by jury is an ancient one, appearing in both Greece and Rome.2 It is rooted in English jurisprudence and may be traced back to the time of William the Conqueror.3 The use of the * Although a law concerning post-trial jury payoffs will go into effect in November 2001, author's note gives further support as to why such legislation was needed in closing this loophole.
  • Lee Harvey Oswald Criminal Charge and Penalty

    Lee Harvey Oswald Criminal Charge and Penalty

    Lee Harvey Oswald Criminal Charge And Penalty Unhealthful and fanned Uriah backpack almost statistically, though Angelo gassed his abrogation overinclined. Which Ulick colonizing so perdie that Reggis numerates her brumes? Ximenez never arousing any mournfulness reawakens homonymously, is Pablo hyperbatic and prototypical enough? John Wilkes Booth crept up from behind a shot him in solitude head at point the range. To extract that chest, you in me guard was going to bring your today. The man charged with murdering the 35th president of the United. Shares of moving Power Inc charged 76 higher in premarket trading. The book depository, and dance halls in charge and an opinion. Some called him a blend but hardy was nonetheless charged with. She was convinced a fishbone was lodged in her lay, there book now a whole amount of previously unknown information about the circumstances surrounding his slaying, but then does leave that right. In anthem the Civil Division appointed the Division's attorney service charge all its. Motion and Limit State's Argument Guilt Stage. With Dallas police frequently ended in leniency for his crimes. Geary was hospitalized for an operation and hence unable to appear means the trial on game day scheduled. Why Jack Ruby Killed Lee Harvey Oswald Crime Magazine. Ruby thought or'd be arrested and charged but he we the. But a major consequence of the hasty and at times inaccurate divulgence of evidence after the assassination was simply to give rise to groundless rumors and public confusion. American public had become attached to it, would presumably have been tried for murder by Texas state authorities had he not been killed by Jack Ruby.
  • SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES CONSUMER LAW 101 a Primer to Help Low Income Nevadans in Atypical Consumer Disputes

    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES CONSUMER LAW 101 a Primer to Help Low Income Nevadans in Atypical Consumer Disputes

    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES CONSUMER LAW 101 A Primer to Help Low Income Nevadans in Atypical Consumer Disputes Friday, February 28, 2020 Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, 725 E. Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas _____________________________________________________________________________ TYLER AYRES, ESQ. Presenting: Introduction to Fair Credit Reporting Act Tyler Ayres practiced criminal defense law exclusively for 15 years. During this time he defended thousands of people against valid accusation and wrongful accusations. He developed an expertise through more than a hundred jury trials and approximately one thousand motion hearings. In addition, he represented thousands at administrative hearings defending driving privileges, property seizures, and numerous other personal interests. He learned about Consumer Advocacy by speaking to his clients. Time after time drug abuse coincided with loss of a job or medical emergency. Finances were nearly always a part of the criminally accused sources of stress and anxiety. After hearing the same stories over and over again, Tyler decided to go on the offensive. He filed his first cases against bad foreclosures for thousands of people. This evolved into lawsuits against debt buyers, banks, unlicensed debt collectors and anyone else who was harassing, intimidating or otherwise hurting his clients. SCOTT C. BORISON, ESQ. Presenting: Mortgage Servicer Litigation Scott C. Borison devotes his time, energy, passion and 30+ years of experience as a lawyer to representing consumers to see they receive the protections they are entitled to under the law and help them enforce the rights they have against debt buyers, debt collectors, lenders, banks and mortgage companies. He recently started a network of attorneys across the country who share the same passion to help consumers: lawzebra.com.
  • Public Has Very Different Opinions of Different Players in O.J

    Public Has Very Different Opinions of Different Players in O.J

    The @arris Poll THE HARRIS POLL 1995 #22 For Release: March 30, 1995 PUBLIC HAS VERY DIFFERENT OPINIONS OF DIFFERENT PLAYERS IN O.J. TRIAL MARCIA CLARK SEEN AS DOING BEST JOB OF LAWYERS AND F. LEE BAILEY THE WORST MOST PEOPLE BELIEVE DENISE BROWN AND DISBELIEVE ROSA LOPEZ Whites and A frican-Americans come to very different judgements about credibility of witnesses. By Humphrey Taylor The public generally gives Judge Lance Ito and Prosecutor Marcia Clark positive marks for their work in the O.J. Simpson trial. Majorities also give defense counsel Johnnie Cochran and Robert Shapiro positive marks -- but not as positive as Marcia Clark's. F. Lee Bailey, on the other hand, is rated 47% positive and 48% negative. These are some of the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of 1,005 adults surveyed between March 23 and 26. This Harris Poll also finds that majorities of the public tend to believe witnesses Denise Brown, Nicole Simpson's sister, and police officer Mark Fuhrman, and not to believe housekeeper Rosa Lopez. A modest plurality, but not a majority, tend to believe O.J. Simpson's house guest Kato Kaelin. Louis Harris & Associates 111 Fifth Avenue NYC (2121 639-9697 Views about the performances of lawyers and (even more strongly) the credibility of witnesses vary sharply between black and white Americans. African- d Americans are more likely to rate defense counsel highly and are far less likely to believe Denise Brown or Mark Fuhrman. Indeed, a massive 82%-10% majority of blacks do not believe Fuhrman -- which suggests that F.