Hauraki Gulf & Islands
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review Landscape Report
HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW LANDSCAPE REPORT September 2006 1 Prepared by Hudson Associates Landscape Architects for Auckland City Council as part of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review September 2006 Hudson Associates Landscape Architects PO Box 8823 06 877-9808 Havelock North Hawke’s Bay [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Landscape Character 10 Strategic Management Areas 13 Land Units 16 Rakino 31 Rotoroa 33 Ridgelines 35 Outstanding Natural Landscapes 38 Settlement Areas 40 Assessment Criteria 45 Appendix 48 References 51 3 LIST OF FIGURE Figure # Description Page 1. Oneroa 1920’s. photograph 6 2. Oneroa 1950’s photograph 6 3 Great Barrier Island. Medlands Settlement Area 7 4 Colour for Buildings 8 5 Waiheke View Report 9 6 Western Waiheke aerials over 20 years 11 7 Great Barrier Island. Natural landscape 11 8 Karamuramu Island 11 9 Rotoroa Island 12 10 Rakino Island 12 11 Strategic Management Areas 14 12 Planning layers 15 13 Waiheke Land Units 17 14 Great Barrier Island Land Units 18 15 Land Unit 4 Wetlands 19 16 Land Unit 2 Dunes and Sand Flats 19 17 Land Unit 1 Coastal Cliffs and Slopes 20 18 Land Unit 8 Regenerating Slopes 20 19 Growth on Land Unit 8 1988 21 20 Growth on Land Unit 8, 2004 21 21 LU 12 Bush Residential 22 22 Land Unit 20 Onetangi Straight over 18 years 23 23 Kennedy Point 26 24 Cory Road Land Unit 20 27 25 Aerial of Tiri Road 28 26 Land Unit 22 Western Waiheke 29 27 Thompsons Point 30 28 Rakino Island 32 29 Rotoroa Island 34 30 Matiatia, house on ridge 36 31 Ridge east of Erua Rd 36 32 House on secondary ridge above Gordons Rd 37 4 INTRODUCTION 5 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to document some of the landscape contribution made in the preparation of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review 2006. -
Bombay Otahuhu Regional Major Capex Project
BOMBAY OTAHUHU REGIONAL MAJOR CAPEX PROJECT MAJOR CAPEX PROPOSAL Transpower New Zealand Limited May 2020 BOMBAY OTAHUHU REGIONAL MAJOR CAPEX PROJECT © Transpower New Zealand Limited 2007. All rights reserved. i Glossary Table of Contents Glossary................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 6 The purpose of this document ............................................................................................... 6 The need for investment ....................................................................................................... 7 Option assessment ............................................................................................................... 8 1 The Proposal ............................................................................................................. 12 2 The Need ................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Capacity of existing assets in the Bombay-Otahuhu region ................................... 13 2.1.2 Future demand growth in the region ...................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Asset condition ..................................................................................................... -
New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31St October to 16Th November 2016 (17 Days)
New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31st October to 16th November 2016 (17 days) The Critically Endangered South Island Takahe by Erik Forsyth Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Erik Forsyth RBL New Zealand – Comprehensive II Trip Report 2016 2 Tour Summary New Zealand is a must for the serious seabird enthusiast. Not only will you see a variety of albatross, petrels and shearwaters, there are multiple- chances of getting out on the high seas and finding something unusual. Seabirds dominate this tour and views of most birds are alongside the boat. There are also several land birds which are unique to these islands: kiwis - terrestrial nocturnal inhabitants, the huge swamp hen-like Takahe - prehistoric in its looks and movements, and wattlebirds, the saddlebacks and Kokako - poor flyers with short wings Salvin’s Albatross by Erik Forsyth which bound along the branches and on the ground. On this tour we had so many highlights, including close encounters with North Island, South Island and Little Spotted Kiwi, Wandering, Northern and Southern Royal, Black-browed, Shy, Salvin’s and Chatham Albatrosses, Mottled and Black Petrels, Buller’s and Hutton’s Shearwater and South Island Takahe, North Island Kokako, the tiny Rifleman and the very cute New Zealand (South Island wren) Rockwren. With a few members of the group already at the hotel (the afternoon before the tour started), we jumped into our van and drove to the nearby Puketutu Island. Here we had a good introduction to New Zealand birding. Arriving at a bay, the canals were teeming with Black Swans, Australasian Shovelers, Mallard and several White-faced Herons. -
Benthic Marine Habitats and Communities of Kawau Bay August 2008 TR 2008/006
Benthic Marine Habitats and Communities of Kawau Bay August 2008 TR 2008/006 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No.006 August 2008 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877483-32-5 Reviewed by: Approved for ARC Publication by: Name: Marcus Cameron Name: Grant Barnes Position: Group Manager – Monitoring and Position: Project Leader – Marine Research Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Date: August 2008 Date: August 2008 Recommended Citation: Chiaroni, L.; Hewitt, J.E.; Hancock, N. (2008). Benthic Marine Habitats and Communities of Kawau Bay. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report 2008/006. © 2008 Auckland Regional Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Regional Council's (ARC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of ARC. ARC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. -
Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc. -
Historic Heritage Survey Aotea Great Barrier Island
Historic Heritage Survey Aotea Great Barrier Island May 2019 Prepared by Megan Walker and Robert Brassey © 2019 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. All contemporary images have been created by Auckland Council except where otherwise attributed. Cover image: Ox Park (Auckland Council 2016) Aotea Great Barrier Island Heritage Survey Draft Report 2 Executive Summary Aotea – Great Barrier has had a long and eventful Māori and European history. In the more recent past there has been a slow rate of development due to the island’s relative isolation. -
Wine-List-Summer-18-19.Pdf
STONYRIDGE VINEYARD Makers of ultra premium red wines on Waiheke Island Tasting Glass Bottle Cellar Door Stonyridge Sauvignon Blanc $3 $13 $50 $45 Waiheke Island 2017 The 2017 Sauvignon Blanc exhibits aromas of ripe tropical fruits, melon and gentle herbaceousness on the nose, while the palate shows great focus and texture from the partial barrel ferment. Perfect for immediate drinking, but will also cellar for up to three years. Stonyridge Reserve Chardonnay $5 $23 $105 $95 Waiheke Island 2017 This Waiheke Island Chardonnay is grown on our Vina del Mar Vineyard, overlooking Onetangi Bay, on an East facing slope protecting the fruit from the afternoon heat. On the nose this Chardonnay is rich and complex, with aromas of stonefruit and citrus, with a robust toasty French oak influence. The palate is rich and creamy, with soft acidity great volume and wonder- ful length. Stonyridge Airfield $4 $16 $75 $65 Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot Waiheke Island 2017 Airfield is the second label to the world famous Bordeaux blend, Larose. Airfield is made from the same quality fruit that will typically be used for Larose, but is a more forward fruit driven wine for the short to medium term. 2017 was another chal- lenging year in the vineyards on Waiheke, so the advantage of the free draining north facing slopes of Stonyridge were key to achieving the quality of the Airfield this year. The heat throughout the ripening period meant that flavour ripeness was easily achieved. On the nose the 2017 Airfield shows red currants, black cherry and fresh Mediterranean herbs, with subtle cedar French oak influence. -
New Zealand Local Pages
NEW ZEALAND LOCAL PAGES AREA PRESIDENCY MESSAGE The Prophetic Promise of the Messiah By Elder Kevin W. Pearson First Counsellor in the Area Presidency he birth of Jesus Christ in the proclamation of the truth, in Tmeridian of time was one great power and authority, there of the most anticipated events were but few who hearkened in all recorded ancient scrip- to his voice, and rejoiced in his ture. Beginning with Adam and presence, and received salva- continuing with every ancient tion at his hands” (D&C 138:26). prophet through the ages, the Contrast that with “the angel promise of the Messiah, the [and] a multitude of the heavenly Redeemer, the Saviour, and the host praising God, and saying, Only Begotten Son of God was Glory to God in the highest, and Elder Kevin W. foretold. on earth peace, good will toward Pearson The righteous have wor- men” (Luke 2:13–14). their deliverance was at hand. shiped the Father in the name The birth of the Son of God They were assembled awaiting of the Son and have exercised would have been one of the the advent of the Son of God into faith in Him, repented and most acknowledged and cele- the spirit world, to declare their covenanted through baptism brated days in all of recorded redemption from the bands of and received the gift of the Holy history in the pre-mortal realm. death” (D&C 138:12,15–16). Ghost in every age where the His mission there would be the He will come again, and all His Melchizedek Priesthood has very foundation of the Father’s words will be fulfilled which He been available on the earth. -
Great Barrier Island Aotea Brochure
AUCKLAND Further information Great Barrier Aotea / Great Barrier Island Base Private Bag 96002 Island/Aotea Great Barrier Island 0961 Hauraki Gulf Marine Park PHONE: 09 429 0044 EMAIL: [email protected] www.doc.govt.nz Published by: Department of Conservation DOC Aotea / Great Barrier Island Base Private Bag 96002 Great Barrier Island October 2019 Editing and design: DOC Creative Services, Conservation House, Wellington Front cover: Aotea Track. Photo: Andris Apse Back cover: Kākā landing in a pōhutukawa tree. Photo: Leon Berard This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. R153740 Contents Aotea and Ngāti Rehua Aotea and Ngāti Rehua .................1 The island renown Ridge to reef ..........................2 The west coast ...........................3 Aotea is the ancestral land of the The east coast ............................3 Ngāti Rehua hapū of Ngāti Wai. It is Marine life ................................4 the southeastern outpost of the tribal rohe of the Ngāti Wai iwi. Seabirds ..................................4 Rich history ..........................5 Although each island, islet and rock has its own individual character and identity, Aotea is Mining ...................................5 viewed as a single physical and spiritual entity Whaling ..................................6 over which a ‘spiritual grid’ lies. At its centre Shipwrecks ...............................6 stands Hirakimata (Mt Hobson), the maunga Historic buildings. 6 tapu of Ngāti Rehua. To the -
Rhamnus Alaternus - Environmental Weed on Motutapu and Rangitoto Islands, Auckland
Tane 36: 57-66 (1997) RHAMNUS ALATERNUS - ENVIRONMENTAL WEED ON MOTUTAPU AND RANGITOTO ISLANDS, AUCKLAND Mairie L. Fromont CI- School of Environmental and Marine Sciences, Tamaki Campus, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland SUMMARY Rhamnus (Rhamnus alaternus) is an environmental weed on the Inner Hauraki Gulf Islands, Auckland. The species has densely colonised coastal slopes of Motutapu Island and invaded unique Metrosideros forest on Rangitoto Island. It can develop dense leafy canopies under which no other plants grow. If left unhindered, rhamnus is likely to smother areas reserved for reforestation in a large restoration programme on Motutapu Island, and progressively replace native plants on Rangitoto Island. Ample seed dispersal of rhamnus is facilitated by common frugivorous birds. Spread of the species is restricted by stock grazing and rabbit browsing, but was probably recently enhanced by the removal of large numbers of possums and wallabies from Motutapu and Rangitoto Islands. Keywords: Rhamnus alaternus; Auckland; Inner Hauraki Gulf; Motutapu Island; Rangitoto Island; weed impact; weed dispersal; browse pressure; weed control strategy. INTRODUCTION Rhamnus (Rhamnus alaternus) also called evergreen, or Italian buckthorn, is a small Mediterranean evergreen tree (Zohary 1962, Tutin et al. 1968, Di Castri 1981). It was sold in New Zealand last century (Hay's Annual Garden Book 1872), but this seems to have been discontinued, as rhamnus is generally not well known as a garden plant in New Zealand today. Rhamnus has naturalised locally from Northland to Otago, particularly in coastal environments (Fromont 1995). The species has become a serious environmental weed in the Auckland Region mostly on the islands of the Inner Hauraki Gulf. -
North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report
North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report 1 July 2011 TR2011/010 North Shore Heritage Volume 1 A Thematic History of the North Shore TR2011/010 Auckland Council TR2011/010, 1 July 2011 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) Volume 1 ISBN 978-1-927169-20-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-21-6 (PDF) Volume 2 ISBN 978-1-927169-22-3 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-23-0 (PDF) 2-volume set ISBN 978-1-927169-24-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-25-4 (PDF) Reviewed by: Approved for AC Publication by: Name: Leslie Vyfhuis Name: Noel Reardon Position: Principal Specialist, Built Heritage Position: Manager, Heritage Organisation: Auckland Council Organisation: Auckland Council Date: 1 July 2011 Date: 1 July 2011 Recommended Citation: North Shore Heritage - Thematic Review Report. Compiled by Heritage Consultancy Services for Auckland Council. 1 July 2011. Auckland Council Document TR 2011/010. © 2011 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's (AC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of AC. AC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. -
Hauraki Gulf Islands
SECTION 32 REPORT REVIEW OF INDIGENOUS VEGETATION CLEARANCE CONTROLS – HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS 1.0 Background 1.1 Introduction In 1999, the Council commissioned Hill Young Cooper Limited to undertake a review of the indigenous vegetation clearance, earthworks, and lot coverage controls applying in the Hauraki Gulf Islands Section of the Council’s District Plan (‘the Plan’). The Plan has been operative since June 1996 and this work was commissioned as part of a progressive review. Hill Young Cooper was asked to focus on whether the practical application of the rules actually achieved the stated outcomes. In its report1, Hill Young Cooper suggested several changes to the existing indigenous vegetation clearance controls. In particular, it recommended to reduce or increase the amount of vegetation clearance permitted for differing land units to ensure the controls were more consistent with stated objectives and policies. The consent thresholds could then be better linked to the adverse environmental effects of indigenous vegetation clearance i.e. erosion, loss of natural habitats and ecology etc. Building on the conclusions of the Hill Young Cooper report, the Council prepared a draft Plan Change in October 2001, however, it did not proceed to the Planning and Regulatory Committee as it did not satisfactorily address the findings of the Auditor General’s report2. The Auditor General’s report found that the indigenous vegetation clearance rules were causing difficulty as they are generally more restrictive than that of previous plans. Therefore, particular sectors of the community, particularly farmers, felt disadvantaged due to the strict permitted clearance controls and the relative cost of obtaining a resource consent.