Little Downham Conservation Area Supplementary Planning Document FEBRUARY 2012 1 Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oosthuizen, MSR, DB Fenland, 30 Jan 2015
RE-EVALUATING MAPS OF DOMESDAY POPULATION DENSITIES: A case study from the Cambridgeshire fenland By SUSAN OOSTHUIZEN Abstract Professor Sir Clifford Darby’s county, regional and national maps of a range of data drawn from the Domesday Book revolutionized scholarship on the social and economic history of late Anglo-Saxon England (e.g. 1935, 1936a, 1936b, 1971, 1977). While this paper does not seek to challenge Darby’s general conclusions, a case study re-examination of the inter-relationship between population density and physical geography in the Cambridgeshire fenland in 1086 suggests the regional usefulness of methodological adjustments to his mapping. It indicates that the population density of the peat and silt fens in the late eleventh century may have been significantly higher than that shown in Darby’s original maps, with implications for the contemporary social and economic history of eastern England. Introduction The magnificence of many fenland churches allows even a complete stranger to infer the large numbers of inhabitants in and general prosperity of the region during the middle ages (Illustration 1, Figure 1). Its affluence is confirmed in the lay subsidies of 1327, 1332 and 1334. Settlements on the silt fens (for which there is the most information) were so prosperous that they generated among the highest returns per square mile and per vill in England, as well as some of the highest rates per taxpayer (Campbell and Bartley 2006: Maps 18.3, 18.13). Although only 20% of English settlements paid more than £225 in 1334, that select group includes not only Ely (paying £358), Leverington (paying £360), and Wisbech (paying £410) but almost every other silt fen vill (Glasscock 1973: 181-3; 1975: 28, 107, 168-9). -
Cambridgeshire Tydd St
C D To Long Sutton To Sutton Bridge 55 Cambridgeshire Tydd St. Mary 24 24 50 50 Foul Anchor 55 Tydd Passenger Transport Map 2011 Tydd St. Giles Gote 24 50 Newton 1 55 1 24 50 To Kings Lynn Fitton End 55 To Kings Lynn 46 Gorefield 24 010 LINCOLNSHIRE 63 308.X1 24 WHF To Holbeach Drove 390 24 390 Leverington WHF See separate map WHF WHF for service detail in this area Throckenholt 24 Wisbech Parson 24 390.WHF Drove 24 46 WHF 24 390 Bellamys Bridge 24 46 Wisbech 3 64 To Terrington 390 24. St. Mary A B Elm Emneth E 390 Murrow 3 24 308 010 60 X1 56 64 7 Friday Bridge 65 Thorney 46 380 308 X1 To Grantham X1 NORFOLK and the North 390 308 Outwell 308 Thorney X1 7 Toll Guyhirn Coldham Upwell For details of bus services To in this area see Peterborough City Council Ring’s End 60 Stamford and 7 publicity or call: 01733 747474 60 2 46 3 64 Leicester Eye www.travelchoice.org 010 2 X1 65 390 56 60.64 3.15.24.31.33.46 To 308 7 380 Three Holes Stamford 203.205.206.390.405 33 46 407.415.701.X1.X4 Chainbridge To Downham Market 33 65 65 181 X4 Peterborough 206 701 24 Lot’s Bridge Wansford 308 350 Coates See separate map Iron Bridge To Leicester for service detail Whittlesey 33 701 in this area X4 Eastrea March Christchurch 65 181 206 701 33 24 15 31 46 Tips End 203 65 F Chesterton Hampton 205 Farcet X4 350 9 405 3 31 35 010 Welney 115 To Elton 24 206 X4 407 56 Kings Lynn 430 415 7 56 Gold Hill Haddon 203.205 X8 X4 350.405 Black Horse 24.181 407.430 Yaxley 3.7.430 Wimblington Boots Drove To Oundle 430 Pondersbridge 206.X4 Morborne Bridge 129 430 56 Doddington Hundred Foot Bank 15 115 203 56 46. -
Registered Food Premises V3 - Addresses Removed
Registered Food Premises V3 - addresses removed Food Use Business Name, Address Bakeries selling through their own shops F P Lanes & Sons Bakery 20 High Street Burwell Cambridge CB25 Bakers Shops Boswell & Son 5 High Street Passage Ely Cambridgeshir Bakers with no on site retail activity Grain Culture 16 Sedgeway Business Park Witchford C Beekeepers Helen Arnold Beekeepers Ely Queen Bees Beekeepers Michael Grey Brewery Three Blind Mice Brewery Unit 10 Black Bank Business Centre Blac Brewery Vinifera Ltd The Stables Hall Farm 8 London Road Ne Brewery Downham Isle Brewery 1 Matthew Wren Close Little Downham Brewery The Sparkling Sake Brewery Unit 1 Black Bank Business Centre Black Brewery Elysian Fields Vineyard Bedwell Hey Farm Ely Road Little Thetfo Butchers Edis Of Ely Limited 24 High Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4 Butchers Bent & Cornwell Quality Meats 24 Market Place Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 Butchers Carter Street Butchers 125 Carter Street Fordham Ely Cambridg Butchers Jack Hurrell 26 High Street Burwell Cambridge CB5 0 Butchers JM & MA Thompson & Sons 1 Fen Bank Isleham Ely Cambridgeshire Butchers Harnwell And Son Limited 14 High Street Haddenham Ely Cambrid Cafes Beanies Vegan Coffee Hub Richmond House 16 - 18 Broad Street El Cafes Elk Coffee Limited 105 The Causeway Burwell Cambridge C Cafes Marmalade & Jam 27 High Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4 02 July 2021 Page 1 of 39 Food Use Business Name, Address Cafes Gloof 9 Churchgate Street Soham Ely Cambrid Cafes Liz'spresso The Home 3 Saxon Business Park Littlep Cafes Fordham Abbey Cafe -
Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council
Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council East Cambridgeshire - Conservative Party Response from South East Cambridgeshire Conservative Association (SECCA) Summary 1. We believe that single Member Divisions provide for the most effective local government in East Cambridgeshire, giving greater clarity to the electorate and to City, Town and Parish Councils and other local organisations. 2. Our preferred scenario (scenario 1) is based on 63 Members, meaning that 9 will be in East Cambridgeshire. This proposed scenario allows for provision of single Member Divisions, achieves good electoral equality, provides for convenient and effective local government and offers the best solution, by some margin, in terms of reflecting community interests and identity. 2.1. We strongly believe that the Boundary Commission’s proposal for two 2 Member Divisions (within the 61 Member scenario) has made serious compromises to both community interests and identity and to convenient and effective local government, markedly so for the proposed Littleport West Division (Division 16). The geographical size and marked difference in service needs of different parts of this Division could cause conflict in Members’ ability to represent the whole of the Division effectively. 2.2. Sutton, and particularly the villages to the south of Sutton (Wentworth, Witchford, Haddenham, Aldreth, Wilburton, Stretham and Little Thetford) are totally remote from Littleport - geographically (residents of those areas look to Ely and Cambridge and do not use or travel to Littleport), culturally (residents of those areas do not link themselves in any way to Littleport), demographically and in terms of service need (educational, economic and health and wellbeing needs are markedly different). -
Emma Day Dissertation Final Draft
SOKEMEN AND FREEMEN IN LATE ANGLO-SAXON EAST ANGLIA IN COMPARATIVE CONTEXT Emma Day Murray Edwards College, University of Cambridge 12th January 2011 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Summary of Dissertation Sokemen and Freemen in Late Anglo-Saxon East Anglia in Comparative Context Emma Day The dissertation is an investigation into sokemen and freemen, a group of higher status peasants, in tenth- and eleventh-century East Anglia (hereafter and throughout the dissertation referred to as less dependent tenants). The study considers four themes. The first concerns the socio-economic condition of less dependent tenants. Previous commentators have focused on, for example, light or non-existent labour services and a connection with royal service and public obligations, but the reality may have been more complex. The second theme considers the distribution of the group across East Anglia. The third and fourth themes consider, respectively, the reliability of the Domesday evidence for less dependent tenants and how far the eastern counties differed from the rest of England. It has been argued that the significant number of less dependent tenants recorded in the eastern counties in Domesday Book indicates that region’s unique social structure. This view increasingly has been questioned. The dissertation uses a partially retrogressive approach, combining pre-Conquest sources with Domesday Book and manorial sources from the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. It argues that less dependent tenants formed a varied group, including both smallholders (probably constituting the greater part of the group) and prosperous landholders defined by high-status service. These individuals were not always clearly distinguished from those immediately above and below them in the hierarchy. -
The Wilkin's of Haddenham, Isle of Ely,Cambs, from the 1600'S to the Present Day
The Wilkin's of Haddenham, Isle of Ely,Cambs, from the 1600's to the present day by Martin John Wilkin 2009 Updated from original "Ancestry of the Wilkin's" in 1999 Table of Contents Text Item ...................................................................................2 Register Report of Martin Wilkin................................................8 Outline Descendant Tree of Martin Wilkin ...............................59 Index .......................................................................................75 1 The Wilkin's of Haddenham Introduction In 1999, I distributed three volumes of ancestral material to about thirty people relative to the ancestors of the Sharpe, Crosley, Taylor and Wilkin families .Over the last couple of years I have realized that I did not give my eight grandchildren any substantial information relative to their background and now hope it is included . In this production I am indicating some of the major details of their Ancestry. Doreen Margaret Sharpe, my wife, is a descendent of King Henry 111rd and has been noted in the "Royalty" records for many years In DEBRETT'S Peerage, Baronetage, Knightage and Companion age dated about 1900 there is a page entitled " The Descent of WILLIAM CLOUGH ESQ of Clifton House and New bald Hall , Yorkshire J.P. from the Blood Royal of England" From it one can conclude that royalty descendent William Cumberland married Elizabeth Pym Burt. Their daughter Rosina Cumberland married John Clough and they had a daughter Emma Clough who married William Gordon Lynch Cotton. One of the children of Emma Clough and William Gordon Lynch Cotton was named Ella Blanch Cotton and she married Herbert Charles Crosley ( Grandson of Sir Henry Crosley ) and they were the Grandparents of Doreen Margaret Sharpe. -
Anna Bailey & Mike Bradley Anna Bail
for.” there them.” improve and protect to money for fight will we beckons.” that’s what a good Councillor is is Councillor good a what that’s - want they me told have people local for.” there “Village halls are often a real focus of the community and and community the of focus real a often are halls “Village says: Mike them.” improve and protect to money for fight will we communities which face more and more challenges as the future future the as challenges more and more face which communities beckons.” the villages have for their community. I will always speak up for what what for up speak always will I community. their for have villages the that’s what a good Councillor is is Councillor good a what that’s - want they me told have people local funding. of share “Village halls are often a real focus of the community and and community the of focus real a often are halls “Village says: Mike green to running stalls for family events. I want to stand up for our our for up stand to want I events. family for stalls running to green communities which face more and more challenges as the future future the as challenges more and more face which communities “I love this area and the unstinting passion that people in in people that passion unstinting the and area this love “I says: Anna the villages have for their community. I will always speak up for what what for up speak always will I community. their for have villages the ensure that villages get their fair fair their get villages that ensure funding. -
Dear Sirs Freedom of Information Request Relating to The
From: Sent: 05 April 2016 12:43 To: FOI Subject: FOI Request - Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Dear Sirs Freedom of Information Request relating to the Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Please send me copies of all internal LGBCE emails, correspondence, notes and minutes dated on or after 1st February 2016 relating directly to the Cambridgeshire County Council boundary review. I am happy to receive these electronically, rather than in writing, and if it is helpful for resource purposes, for emails to simply be forwarded to me, rather than collated into one file. Yours faithfully 1 From: Palacky, Alex on behalf of FOI Sent: 06 April 2016 16:31 To: ' Subject: Your FOI Request: FOI 16/04 Dear , Thank you for your request for information received on 5 April 2016 under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. You have requested: “Freedom of Information Request relating to the Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Please send me copies of all internal LGBCE emails, correspondence, notes and minutes dated on or after 1st February 2016 relating directly to the Cambridgeshire County Council boundary review” The Commission aims to respond promptly and within the statutory deadline of 20 working days. Please expect a response by 3 May 2016. In some cases a fee may be payable and if that is the case I will let you know. A fees notice will be issued to you, and you will be required to pay before I will proceed to deal with your request. If you have any queries or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me on the details provided below. -
East Cambridgeshire District Council |
EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTITUTION PART 1 INTRODUCTION The Council's Constitution East Cambridgeshire District Council has revised its constitution which sets out how the Council operates, how decisions are made and the procedures which are followed to ensure that these are efficient, transparent and accountable. Some of these processes are required by the law, while others are a matter for the Council to choose. The Constitution is divided into 6 Parts. The 12 Articles in Part 2 set out the basic rules governing the Council's business. These are supplemented by procedures and codes of practice which are provided. What's in the Constitution? Article 1: sets out the Council's overall purpose and its strategic objectives. Articles 2-12: explains the rights of citizens and how the key parts of the Council operate. The Council is composed of Councillors elected every four years. The overriding duty of Councillors is to the whole community, but they have a special duty to their constituents, including those who did not vote for them. When Councillors take up office they have to agree to follow a code of conduct to ensure high standards in the way they undertake their duties. The Monitoring Officer shall arrange training and provide advice to Members on the code of conduct. Composition of the Council The Council is composed of 39 Councillors. The current political make-up of the Council [as at May 20151] is: Conservative Group – 36 Liberal Democratic Group – 2 Independent – 1 Attached: Appendix 1 - Full list of the current Councillors -
Delivery of REFUSE SACKS
Delivery of REFUSE SACKS East Cambridgeshire District Council East Cambridgeshire households will soon receive a roll of 52 refuse sacks, which are intended to last until the next distribution in 1 year’s time. No further sacks will be issued until then, but additional refuse will be collected if presented for collection in suitable black refuse sacks provided by householders. Sack distribution dates are shown below. Please make a note on your calendar to prompt you if you do not receive your sacks at the correct time. Please note that claims for non- delivery of sacks will not be accepted beyond the date stated in the table below. Please contact the Council if you have not Last date for claiming non-delivery Week Commencing received sacks by of sacks Monday 15th August 2016 Monday 22nd August Friday 16th September ELY Please contact the Council if you have not Last date for claiming non-delivery Week Commencing received sacks by of sacks Monday 22nd August 2016 Monday 29th August Friday 23rd September BOTTISHAM, CHITTERING, FORDHAM, HADDENHAM, LODE, LONGMEADOW, MEPAL, STRETHAM, WARDY HILL, WITCHAM, WITCHAM TOLL Please contact the Council if you have not Last date for claiming non-delivery Week Commencing received sacks by of sacks Monday 29th August 2016 Monday 5th September Friday 30th September ALDRETH, BURWELL, LITTLE DOWNHAM, WENTWORTH, WILBURTON, WITCHFORD Please contact the Council if you have not Last date for claiming non-delivery Week Commencing received sacks by of sacks Monday 5th September 2016 Monday 12th September Friday -
Settlement Hierarchy in East Cambridgeshire
Settlement Hierarchy in East Cambridgeshire November 2017 Note: This Report, dated November 2017, supersedes all previous version of this Report Contents 1.0 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................2 2.0 National and Local Policy Context ........................................................................................................2 3.0 Why is there a need for a settlement hierarchy? ................................................................................2 4.0 What is a settlement hierarchy? ............................................................................................................3 5.0 Settlement hierarchy methodology ........................................................................................................3 Settlement Hierarchy based on population ................................................................................................4 Settlement Hierarchy based on facilities ....................................................................................................6 Settlement Hierarchy based on population and village facilities .........................................................9 6.0 Overall Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 11 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 It is common practice, particularly for more rural districts, for a Local Plan to identify a settlement -
Diocese of Ely Directory
Diocese of Ely Directory Published: 12 February 2021 For comments, corrections or suggestions please email Jackie Williamson on [email protected] Introduction This directory has been ordered alphabetically by Archdeaconry > Deanery > Benefice - and then Church/Parish. For each Church/Parish, the names and contact details (email and telephone) have been included for the Licensed Clergy and Churchwardens. Where known a website and “A Church Near You” link have also been included. Towards the back of the directory, details have also been included that include, where known, the following contact details: • Rural Deans (name, number and email) • Clergy (name, number and email) • Clergy with Permission to Officiate (name, number and email) • General Synod Members from the Diocese of Ely - (name only) • Bishops Council (name only) • Diocesan Synod Members (Ely) (name only) • Assistant Bishops (name only) • Surrogates (name only) • Bishop’s and Archdeacons Office, Ely Diocesan Board of Finance staff, Cathedral Staff How to update or amend details If your details are inaccurate, or you would prefer a change to what is included, please direct your query as follows: • Licensed Clergy: Please contact the Bishop’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • Clergy with PTO: Please contact the Bishop’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • Churchwardens: Please contact the Archdeacon’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • PCC Roles: [email protected] • Deanery/Benefice/Parish/Church names: DAC Office on [email protected] Data Protection The Ely Diocesan Board of Finance considers there to be a legitimate justification for publishing the contact details for Licensed Clergy (including those with PTO), Churchwardens and Diocesan staff (including those in the Archdeacons’ and Bishops’ offices) and key staff in Ely Cathedral in this Directory and on occasion the Diocesan website.