Return Your Questionnaire Either to ECDC Offices Or Place It in a Drop Box
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Recommendations for East Cambridgeshire District Council
Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 4 Submissions received 4 Electorate figures 5 Council size 5 Warding patterns 5 Draft recommendations 6 North 7 Central 9 South 10 Conclusions 12 Parish electoral arrangements 12 3 Have your say 14 Appendices A Table A1: Draft recommendations for East Cambridgeshire 16 District Council B Submissions received 18 C Glossary and abbreviations 19 Summary Who we are The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities throughout England. Electoral review An electoral review examines and proposes new electoral arrangements for a local authority. A local authority’s electoral arrangements decide: How many councillors are needed How many wards or electoral divisions should there be, where are their boundaries and what should they be called How many councillors should represent each ward or division Why East Cambridgeshire? We are conducting an electoral review of East Cambridgeshire District Council following a request by the Council in order to consider a reduction in council size. Our proposals for East Cambridgeshire East Cambridgeshire District Council currently has 39 councillors. Based on the evidence we received during previous phases of the review, we consider that a council size of 28 members – a reduction of 11 – will ensure that the Council can perform its roles and responsibilities effectively. -
Oosthuizen, MSR, DB Fenland, 30 Jan 2015
RE-EVALUATING MAPS OF DOMESDAY POPULATION DENSITIES: A case study from the Cambridgeshire fenland By SUSAN OOSTHUIZEN Abstract Professor Sir Clifford Darby’s county, regional and national maps of a range of data drawn from the Domesday Book revolutionized scholarship on the social and economic history of late Anglo-Saxon England (e.g. 1935, 1936a, 1936b, 1971, 1977). While this paper does not seek to challenge Darby’s general conclusions, a case study re-examination of the inter-relationship between population density and physical geography in the Cambridgeshire fenland in 1086 suggests the regional usefulness of methodological adjustments to his mapping. It indicates that the population density of the peat and silt fens in the late eleventh century may have been significantly higher than that shown in Darby’s original maps, with implications for the contemporary social and economic history of eastern England. Introduction The magnificence of many fenland churches allows even a complete stranger to infer the large numbers of inhabitants in and general prosperity of the region during the middle ages (Illustration 1, Figure 1). Its affluence is confirmed in the lay subsidies of 1327, 1332 and 1334. Settlements on the silt fens (for which there is the most information) were so prosperous that they generated among the highest returns per square mile and per vill in England, as well as some of the highest rates per taxpayer (Campbell and Bartley 2006: Maps 18.3, 18.13). Although only 20% of English settlements paid more than £225 in 1334, that select group includes not only Ely (paying £358), Leverington (paying £360), and Wisbech (paying £410) but almost every other silt fen vill (Glasscock 1973: 181-3; 1975: 28, 107, 168-9). -
Cambridgeshire Tydd St
C D To Long Sutton To Sutton Bridge 55 Cambridgeshire Tydd St. Mary 24 24 50 50 Foul Anchor 55 Tydd Passenger Transport Map 2011 Tydd St. Giles Gote 24 50 Newton 1 55 1 24 50 To Kings Lynn Fitton End 55 To Kings Lynn 46 Gorefield 24 010 LINCOLNSHIRE 63 308.X1 24 WHF To Holbeach Drove 390 24 390 Leverington WHF See separate map WHF WHF for service detail in this area Throckenholt 24 Wisbech Parson 24 390.WHF Drove 24 46 WHF 24 390 Bellamys Bridge 24 46 Wisbech 3 64 To Terrington 390 24. St. Mary A B Elm Emneth E 390 Murrow 3 24 308 010 60 X1 56 64 7 Friday Bridge 65 Thorney 46 380 308 X1 To Grantham X1 NORFOLK and the North 390 308 Outwell 308 Thorney X1 7 Toll Guyhirn Coldham Upwell For details of bus services To in this area see Peterborough City Council Ring’s End 60 Stamford and 7 publicity or call: 01733 747474 60 2 46 3 64 Leicester Eye www.travelchoice.org 010 2 X1 65 390 56 60.64 3.15.24.31.33.46 To 308 7 380 Three Holes Stamford 203.205.206.390.405 33 46 407.415.701.X1.X4 Chainbridge To Downham Market 33 65 65 181 X4 Peterborough 206 701 24 Lot’s Bridge Wansford 308 350 Coates See separate map Iron Bridge To Leicester for service detail Whittlesey 33 701 in this area X4 Eastrea March Christchurch 65 181 206 701 33 24 15 31 46 Tips End 203 65 F Chesterton Hampton 205 Farcet X4 350 9 405 3 31 35 010 Welney 115 To Elton 24 206 X4 407 56 Kings Lynn 430 415 7 56 Gold Hill Haddon 203.205 X8 X4 350.405 Black Horse 24.181 407.430 Yaxley 3.7.430 Wimblington Boots Drove To Oundle 430 Pondersbridge 206.X4 Morborne Bridge 129 430 56 Doddington Hundred Foot Bank 15 115 203 56 46. -
Registered Food Premises V3 - Addresses Removed
Registered Food Premises V3 - addresses removed Food Use Business Name, Address Bakeries selling through their own shops F P Lanes & Sons Bakery 20 High Street Burwell Cambridge CB25 Bakers Shops Boswell & Son 5 High Street Passage Ely Cambridgeshir Bakers with no on site retail activity Grain Culture 16 Sedgeway Business Park Witchford C Beekeepers Helen Arnold Beekeepers Ely Queen Bees Beekeepers Michael Grey Brewery Three Blind Mice Brewery Unit 10 Black Bank Business Centre Blac Brewery Vinifera Ltd The Stables Hall Farm 8 London Road Ne Brewery Downham Isle Brewery 1 Matthew Wren Close Little Downham Brewery The Sparkling Sake Brewery Unit 1 Black Bank Business Centre Black Brewery Elysian Fields Vineyard Bedwell Hey Farm Ely Road Little Thetfo Butchers Edis Of Ely Limited 24 High Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4 Butchers Bent & Cornwell Quality Meats 24 Market Place Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 Butchers Carter Street Butchers 125 Carter Street Fordham Ely Cambridg Butchers Jack Hurrell 26 High Street Burwell Cambridge CB5 0 Butchers JM & MA Thompson & Sons 1 Fen Bank Isleham Ely Cambridgeshire Butchers Harnwell And Son Limited 14 High Street Haddenham Ely Cambrid Cafes Beanies Vegan Coffee Hub Richmond House 16 - 18 Broad Street El Cafes Elk Coffee Limited 105 The Causeway Burwell Cambridge C Cafes Marmalade & Jam 27 High Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4 02 July 2021 Page 1 of 39 Food Use Business Name, Address Cafes Gloof 9 Churchgate Street Soham Ely Cambrid Cafes Liz'spresso The Home 3 Saxon Business Park Littlep Cafes Fordham Abbey Cafe -
Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council
Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council East Cambridgeshire - Conservative Party Response from South East Cambridgeshire Conservative Association (SECCA) Summary 1. We believe that single Member Divisions provide for the most effective local government in East Cambridgeshire, giving greater clarity to the electorate and to City, Town and Parish Councils and other local organisations. 2. Our preferred scenario (scenario 1) is based on 63 Members, meaning that 9 will be in East Cambridgeshire. This proposed scenario allows for provision of single Member Divisions, achieves good electoral equality, provides for convenient and effective local government and offers the best solution, by some margin, in terms of reflecting community interests and identity. 2.1. We strongly believe that the Boundary Commission’s proposal for two 2 Member Divisions (within the 61 Member scenario) has made serious compromises to both community interests and identity and to convenient and effective local government, markedly so for the proposed Littleport West Division (Division 16). The geographical size and marked difference in service needs of different parts of this Division could cause conflict in Members’ ability to represent the whole of the Division effectively. 2.2. Sutton, and particularly the villages to the south of Sutton (Wentworth, Witchford, Haddenham, Aldreth, Wilburton, Stretham and Little Thetford) are totally remote from Littleport - geographically (residents of those areas look to Ely and Cambridge and do not use or travel to Littleport), culturally (residents of those areas do not link themselves in any way to Littleport), demographically and in terms of service need (educational, economic and health and wellbeing needs are markedly different). -
Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background -
Little Downham Conservation Area Supplementary Planning Document FEBRUARY 2012 1 Introduction
EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL Local Development Framework Little Downham Conservation Area Supplementary Planning Document FEBRUARY 2012 1 Introduction 2 Public Consultation 3 What are Conservation Areas? 4 What is a Conservation Area Appraisal? 5 Overview of the area 6 Boundaries and Extent of Conservation Area 7 History 8 Archaeology 9 Location and Landscape Setting 10 Street by Street Analysis 11 Spatial Analysis 12 Building Materials and Styles 13 Buildings of Townscape Merit 14 Boundary Assessment 15 Enhancement Opportunities 16 Acknowledgements Appendices 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The village of Little Downham stands on the Ely ridge that runs from Sutton to Downham Market. The Conservation Area here was originally designated in September 1975 and is focused around the settlement centre and main thoroughfare. 1.2 This document aims to fulfill East Cambridgeshire District Council’s duty to “draw up and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement” of these areas as required by the provisions of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990. 1.3 The document includes; a review of the boundaries of the Conservation Area, a character appraisal, design guidance for new development and policies for the management and monitoring of the area in order to preserve its character. 2 Public Consultation 2.1 The public consultation will be carried out in compliance with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement (17/10/06). 3 What are Conservation Areas? 3.1 Conservation Areas are defined as “areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. -
Emma Day Dissertation Final Draft
SOKEMEN AND FREEMEN IN LATE ANGLO-SAXON EAST ANGLIA IN COMPARATIVE CONTEXT Emma Day Murray Edwards College, University of Cambridge 12th January 2011 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Summary of Dissertation Sokemen and Freemen in Late Anglo-Saxon East Anglia in Comparative Context Emma Day The dissertation is an investigation into sokemen and freemen, a group of higher status peasants, in tenth- and eleventh-century East Anglia (hereafter and throughout the dissertation referred to as less dependent tenants). The study considers four themes. The first concerns the socio-economic condition of less dependent tenants. Previous commentators have focused on, for example, light or non-existent labour services and a connection with royal service and public obligations, but the reality may have been more complex. The second theme considers the distribution of the group across East Anglia. The third and fourth themes consider, respectively, the reliability of the Domesday evidence for less dependent tenants and how far the eastern counties differed from the rest of England. It has been argued that the significant number of less dependent tenants recorded in the eastern counties in Domesday Book indicates that region’s unique social structure. This view increasingly has been questioned. The dissertation uses a partially retrogressive approach, combining pre-Conquest sources with Domesday Book and manorial sources from the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. It argues that less dependent tenants formed a varied group, including both smallholders (probably constituting the greater part of the group) and prosperous landholders defined by high-status service. These individuals were not always clearly distinguished from those immediately above and below them in the hierarchy. -
The Ouse Washes
NRA Anglii j i t - u THE OUSE WASHES “The Ouse Washes offer a rich variety of experiences both as an internationally important wildlife site and its continuing role of protecting the fens from flooding. ” O wildlife RSPB NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region THE ANGLIAN REGION The Anglian Region hosts a rich variety of wildlife habitats, flora and landscapes associated with its streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, wetlands, estuaries and coastal waters. Many of these are protected by statutory designations, for example, 75% of the coastline is covered by a conservation and/or landscape designation. Five Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty fall either partially or wholly within Anglian Region, along with England's newest National Park - the Broads. A fifth of England and Wales internationally important wetlands, from large estuaries such as the Humber and the Wash, to Ouse Washes in flood washlands such as the Ouse Washes, occur within this region. THE OUSE WASHES - FLOOD DEFENCE IMPORTANCE The Middle and South Level Barrier Banks contain Bedford Ouse flood flows within the Ouse Washes and are therefore vital for the flood protection of the Cambridgeshire Fens. Complete towns, villages and isolated dwellings, Flood waters are able to flow throigh \ together with approximately 29,000 the Hundred Foot River when pean " hectatres of agricultural land are protected from flooding by the Ouse When the peak flood has passed, i Washes Defences. Washes and back into the Old Failure of the South Level Barrier Bank would cause over 230 residential properties to be flooded to depths of up to 1.8m. As much as 11,000 hectares of Flooded washland and ditches agricultural land would be flooded. -
The Wilkin's of Haddenham, Isle of Ely,Cambs, from the 1600'S to the Present Day
The Wilkin's of Haddenham, Isle of Ely,Cambs, from the 1600's to the present day by Martin John Wilkin 2009 Updated from original "Ancestry of the Wilkin's" in 1999 Table of Contents Text Item ...................................................................................2 Register Report of Martin Wilkin................................................8 Outline Descendant Tree of Martin Wilkin ...............................59 Index .......................................................................................75 1 The Wilkin's of Haddenham Introduction In 1999, I distributed three volumes of ancestral material to about thirty people relative to the ancestors of the Sharpe, Crosley, Taylor and Wilkin families .Over the last couple of years I have realized that I did not give my eight grandchildren any substantial information relative to their background and now hope it is included . In this production I am indicating some of the major details of their Ancestry. Doreen Margaret Sharpe, my wife, is a descendent of King Henry 111rd and has been noted in the "Royalty" records for many years In DEBRETT'S Peerage, Baronetage, Knightage and Companion age dated about 1900 there is a page entitled " The Descent of WILLIAM CLOUGH ESQ of Clifton House and New bald Hall , Yorkshire J.P. from the Blood Royal of England" From it one can conclude that royalty descendent William Cumberland married Elizabeth Pym Burt. Their daughter Rosina Cumberland married John Clough and they had a daughter Emma Clough who married William Gordon Lynch Cotton. One of the children of Emma Clough and William Gordon Lynch Cotton was named Ella Blanch Cotton and she married Herbert Charles Crosley ( Grandson of Sir Henry Crosley ) and they were the Grandparents of Doreen Margaret Sharpe. -
Anna Bailey & Mike Bradley Anna Bail
for.” there them.” improve and protect to money for fight will we beckons.” that’s what a good Councillor is is Councillor good a what that’s - want they me told have people local for.” there “Village halls are often a real focus of the community and and community the of focus real a often are halls “Village says: Mike them.” improve and protect to money for fight will we communities which face more and more challenges as the future future the as challenges more and more face which communities beckons.” the villages have for their community. I will always speak up for what what for up speak always will I community. their for have villages the that’s what a good Councillor is is Councillor good a what that’s - want they me told have people local funding. of share “Village halls are often a real focus of the community and and community the of focus real a often are halls “Village says: Mike green to running stalls for family events. I want to stand up for our our for up stand to want I events. family for stalls running to green communities which face more and more challenges as the future future the as challenges more and more face which communities “I love this area and the unstinting passion that people in in people that passion unstinting the and area this love “I says: Anna the villages have for their community. I will always speak up for what what for up speak always will I community. their for have villages the ensure that villages get their fair fair their get villages that ensure funding. -
Dear Sirs Freedom of Information Request Relating to The
From: Sent: 05 April 2016 12:43 To: FOI Subject: FOI Request - Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Dear Sirs Freedom of Information Request relating to the Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Please send me copies of all internal LGBCE emails, correspondence, notes and minutes dated on or after 1st February 2016 relating directly to the Cambridgeshire County Council boundary review. I am happy to receive these electronically, rather than in writing, and if it is helpful for resource purposes, for emails to simply be forwarded to me, rather than collated into one file. Yours faithfully 1 From: Palacky, Alex on behalf of FOI Sent: 06 April 2016 16:31 To: ' Subject: Your FOI Request: FOI 16/04 Dear , Thank you for your request for information received on 5 April 2016 under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. You have requested: “Freedom of Information Request relating to the Cambridgeshire County Council Boundary Review Please send me copies of all internal LGBCE emails, correspondence, notes and minutes dated on or after 1st February 2016 relating directly to the Cambridgeshire County Council boundary review” The Commission aims to respond promptly and within the statutory deadline of 20 working days. Please expect a response by 3 May 2016. In some cases a fee may be payable and if that is the case I will let you know. A fees notice will be issued to you, and you will be required to pay before I will proceed to deal with your request. If you have any queries or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me on the details provided below.