Urban Public Space and Land Management Local Assessment for Equitable Growth in Gulu and Mbale Municipalities, Uganda Main Report Authors: Paul I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Urban Public Space and Land Management Local Assessment for Equitable Growth in Gulu and Mbale Municipalities, Uganda Main Report Authors: Paul I CitiesAlliance Cities Without Slums GULU MBALE Urban Public Space and Land Management Local Assessment for Equitable Growth in Gulu and Mbale Municipalities, Uganda Main Report Authors: Paul I. Mukwaya Peter Wegulo Denis Tugume Peter Kasaija Supervision and Coordination: Dmitry Pozhidaev, UNCDF Uganda Design: Design@Bay September 2018 Copyright © UNCDF All rights reserved The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNCDF, or their Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the map(s) and graph(s) contained in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or UNCDF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Local Assessment of Urban Public Space and Land Management for Equitable Growth in Gulu and Mbale Municipalities, Uganda Main Report Acknowledgments Tappy Namulondo : Town Clerk, MMC Francis Barabanawe : Town Clerk, GMC Mutwalib Zandya : Mayor, MMC Rhoda Nyaribi : Environment Officer, MMC George Aligech : President, Municipal Development Forum Sarah Apio : Ag. Clerk to Council, GMC Monday Ruth Buckley : Community Development Officer, GMC John Charles Luwa : Municipal Economic Planner, GMC Alex Ojera : Ag. Secretary, Gulu District Land Board Evelyn Mukonyezi : Physical Planner, GMC Hellen Ossaba : Assistant Librarian, MMC Eunice Muyama : District Physical Planner, Mbale DLG Joseph Lanyisi : Enforcement Officer, MMC Fred Nambafo : Physical Planner, MMC Moses Wotsomu : Economic Planner, MMC Angella Neumbe : Community Development Officer, MMC Eva Walwema : Human Resources Officer, MMC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Did anyone know that an estimated 299 and 138.15 hectares of Mbale and Gulu Municipalities respectively are public space? That size of the municipalities’ land is for the public, to play, to create, to walk, to relax, to imagine, to paint, to dance, to make music, to perform, to protest, to sing, to come together, to share, among others. This consultancy to prepare a Local Assessment Report (LAR) on Public Space and Land Management in Gulu and Mbale Municipalities was commissioned by UNCDF in partnership with Cities Alliance, the global partnership for poverty reduction and the promotion of cities in sustainable development with a representative global membership of over 30 full and associate members to implement the Joint Work Programme on Equitable Economic Growth in Cities in Uganda. The main purpose of the consultancy was to assist two municipal governments, to develop well-researched and evidence-based policy recommendations on how to improve the delivery of municipal public goods and service that contribute to equitable economic growth. This report is geared at facilitating UNCDF and other JWP members to support the promotion of equitable access to public goods and services in the selected Ugandan cities, based on local needs, capacities and priorities. The study team undertook its assignment in close collaboration with the relevant municipal authorities and Municipal Development Forums, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, Ministry of Local Government, Urban Authorities Association of Uganda (UAAU) and other relevant government and non-government stakeholders as well as with the JWP members in Uganda (Cities Alliance, DFID, World Bank and GIZ). The teams explored how existing processes mediate public space and land management. Through an inventory of the respective public space and land management mechanisms and a critical examination of the challenges, opportunities and capacity issues around access by various stakeholder groups to these assets, the study drew valuable insights into how the relevant authorities could improve provision of public services for equitable economic growth. The study has established that the early planning of the two municipalities was built on the neighbourhood principle with ample provision of public spaces. The early development of Mbale Municipality was dictated by ample and public space including Uhuru Park, Golf Course, Cricket Grounds, Children’s Park, Rugby Grounds, Mbale Central Forest Reserve, Namakwekwe Childrens Park, Mpumudde Playground and several other neighbourhood parks and school playgrounds spread across the municipality. Equally important are the early needs for open spaces in Gulu Municipality with Pece War Memorial Stadium, Golf Course, Boma Grounds, Kaunda Grounds and Gulu Central Forest Reserve as the most dominant public spaces. The amount of public space in Mbale and Gulu Municipality varies widely, with Mbale having twice the amount of public spaces (in fact 2.162 times) that Gulu Municipality has. The distribution of public spaces in Mbale Municipality forms a triangular shape with the largest number of the spaces located from the centre of town southwards. On the other hand, the existing public spaces in Gulu Municipality are distributed along a linear axis; an arc stretching from the east through the centre of the municipality to the western direction. II | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE 1: Size of Public Spaces by Classification in Mbale and Gulu Municipality Mbale Municipality Gulu Municipality #sites Hectares #sites Hectares Stadium 1 3.548 1 2.413 Green/ Open Spaces 11 41.074 10 31.035 Playgrounds 12 6.656 1 15.973 Markets 5 3.834 10 30.468 School grounds 8 18.234 11 33.189 Natural areas 1 222.575 1 25.077 Cemetery 2 2.635 1 0 Library 1 0.127 1 n/a Total 41 298.683 34 138.154 FIGURE 1: Public Spaces in Mbale Municipality EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | III Overall, we observed that residents of the two municipalities are not well served with public spaces. In Mbale and Gulu Municipalities, the current provision level of public space per 1,000 residents was 0.8518 and 0.91915 hectares respectively. This state of provisioning public spaces tells us that Mbale and Gulu Municipalities in general are deficient given the international standard recommended provision. When the provisioning of public spaces is considered by division, it ranges from 0.585ha/1,000 residents in Industrial Division to 3.181ha/1,000 residents in the less populated Wanale Division in Mbale Municipality. On the other hand, the provisioning in Gulu Municipality ranges from 0.10188ha/1,000 residents in Layibi Division to 1.35667ha/1,000 residents in Bardege Division. It is only Bardege and Wanale Divisions in Gulu and Mbale Municipality respectively that have a surplus of public spaces for every 1000 residents. Their level of provisioning stands at 1.357 and 3.181 hectares per 1000 residents. Among the seven divisions, it is also evident that Layibi Division in Gulu Municipality reveals exceptionally low levels of provision of public space. Regardless of which standard is applied, both municipalities fare badly. FIGURE 2: Public Spaces in Gulu Municipality IV | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE 2: Current and Future Space Needs in Mbale and Gulu Municipality Mbale Municipality Gulu Municipality Total population (2014) 89350 150306 Size (hectares) 76.108 138.15 Available space Provision (ha/1000 0.852 0.919 residents) Size (hectares) 107.22 180.37 Required public space (2017) Deficit (hectares) -31.1116 -42.21 Projected futures needs of 2030 212.96 245.16 public space (hectares) 2050 481.82 319.21 To quantify how much is available and that which is required, the gap analysis shows that currently the municipalities require 107.22 ha and 180.367 ha of public space for Mbale and Gulu Municipalities respectively. Based on projected population increases future public space supply is estimated to drop substantially to 0.429ha/1,000 residents and 0.676ha/1,000 residents in Mbale and Gulu Municipality respectively by 2030, if the two respective authorities take no decisive action to reverse current trends. The proportion of public space could drop even further to 0.19ha/1,000 residents and 0.519ha/1,000 residents in both cases respectively under a business-as-usual scenario by 2050. These findings show that the municipalities are anticipated to remain deficient in the future with regards to public space supply. It should also be noted that once proper planning is done in the two municipalities and given the current population growth rates, the projected futures public space needs by 2030 would amount to 212.96 ha and 245.16 ha for Mbale and Gulu municipalities respectively. This would increase to 482.82 ha and 319.21 ha by 2050 for the two municipalities respectively. This demonstrates the need for municipal authorities to be very proactive in providing more public space but also take decisive action to enforce the protection and maintenance of existing public spaces. The Local Government Act Cap 243 provides autonomy to local governments to prepare or cause to prepare Physical Development Plans, carry out land surveys, land administration and environmental management. The Act granted urban authorities various responsibilities, notably the delivery of essential social services such as education and healthcare and it also grants the municipalities the authority to acquire, establish, develop, maintenance or manage of public parks, garden and recreation grounds. Currently, the existing physical development plans for the two municipalities lack detailed and clear protocols or standard guidelines on how they (plan to) manage public spaces, let alone an existing inventory or understanding of the public agencies
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Were Legally Registered and the Ones That Had Identified, 194 Were Not in the Register Were Found Operational by the Census Team
    A SACCO Annual General Meeting in Lango, Northern Uganda Chapter Five SACCOs and MFIs 125 5.1 Failing SACCOs: Who Cares?1 Visiting a member of MAMIDECOT, a successfully managed SACCO in Masaka. Section 1 Evidence of Failure Why should anybody care about failing, – thus SACCOs seldom live their “full missing or untraceable SACCOs? Are not lives”. They therefore do not serve their institutions, like biological organisms, full purpose before dying. supposed to be subject to the immutable ii) In the remote rural areas, SACCOs are law of entropy? Are they not supposed to be often the only providers of financial born, grow, decline and die? And, given this services for most people. When the pattern, should the failing of SACCOs be an SACCOs fail, this leaves people with issue? little or no alternative services. There are three principal reasons why we iii) SACCO collapses leave people poorer should all be concerned about the failure rate and more desperate as they lose their of SACCOs in Uganda: meager savings i) Whereas in countries like Kenya the iv) Losing their money in failing SACCOs life of a SACCO spans over decades, makes poor people more cynical of the failure rate in Uganda suggests that using financial institutions. Such a most SACCOs fail after only a few years 1 Author: Andrew Obara, FRIENDS Consult 126 polluting effect entrenches financial iii. While the census team was remarkably exclusion as more low-income / poor thorough, there may have been some people get discouraged from accessing institutions which exist but were simply financial institutions’ services.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT BASELINE: Nakasongola, Nakaseke and Nebbi in Uganda
    EASE – CA PROJECT PARTNERS EAST AFRICAN CIVIL SOCIETY FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & CLIMATE ACTION (EASE – CA) PROJECT DISTRICT BASELINE: Nakasongola, Nakaseke and Nebbi in Uganda SEPTEMBER 2019 Prepared by: Joint Energy and Environment Projects (JEEP) P. O. Box 4264 Kampala, (Uganda). Supported by Tel: +256 414 578316 / 0772468662 Email: [email protected] JEEP EASE CA PROJECT 1 Website: www.jeepfolkecenter.org East African Civil Society for Sustainable Energy and Climate Action (EASE-CA) Project ALEF Table of Contents ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background of JEEP ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Energy situation in Uganda .................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Objectives of the baseline study ......................................................................................... 11 1.4 Report Structure ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Ground.Pdf
    The Unprecedented Shrinking of Public Spaces LOSING and Land in Ugandan GROUND? Municipalities A publication of the Cities Alliance Joint Work Programme for Equitable Economic Growth in Cities By Paul. I. Mukwaya, Dmitry Pozhidaev, Denis Tugume, and Peter Kasaija © UNCDF and Cities Alliance 2018 AUTHORS Paul. I. Mukwaya, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda Dmitry Pozhidaev, United National Capital Development Fund, Kampala, Uganda Denis Tugume, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda Peter Kasaija, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda JWP MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION Rene Peter Hohmann, Cities Alliance Fredrik Bruhn, Cities Alliance GRAPHIC DESIGN Creatrix Design Group This publication was produced by Cities Alliance and the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) as part of the Cities Alliance Joint Work Programme (JWP) for Equitable Economic Growth in Cities. The U.K. Department for International Development (DFID) chairs the JWP, and its members are the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), UN-Habitat, Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF), Ford Foundation, Institute for Housing and Development Studies (IHS) at Erasmus University Rotterdam and the World Bank. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Cities Alliance, the United Nations, including UNCDF and UNOPS, or the UK Department for International Development (DFID). 2 Losing Ground? SUMMARY There is increasing importance being attached to is to promote economic growth that benefits ALL public spaces and other municipal assets, such as citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Magado Ronald Article
    GEROLD RAHMANN, VICTOR OLOWE, TIMOTHY OLABIYI, KHALID AZIM, OLUGBENGA ADEOLUWA (Eds.) (2018) Scientific Track Proceedings of the 4TH African Organic Conference. “Ecological and Organic Agriculture Strategies for Viable Continental and National Development in the Context of the African Union's Agenda 2063”. November 5-8, 2018. Saly Portudal, Senegal Impact of Climate Change on Cassava Farming a Case study of Wabinyonyi Sub county Nakasongola District Magado Ronald and Abstract Ssekyewa Charles Cassava is a potential crop to improve the livelihood of people but findings from Nakasongola District this research through conducting interviews from respondents show that 97.8% Farmers Association, responded that climate change contributed to the decline in yield. There is increased P.O Box 1, Nakasongola incidences of pest and diseases that cause rotting of the tubers that are the economic District, Uganda part used by the people. The study recommends that the Government of Uganda should strengthen climate change issues through line ministries such as Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industries and Fisheries, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Corresponding author: Urban development; Ministry of Water and Environment in terms of policies to [email protected] support the development of smallholder farmers during this era of climate change. Nakasongola District Local Government and its development partners should strengthen agricultural service delivery in all areas particularly climate Keywords: change smart agriculture and much attention should be put on cassava value Climate change, chain from production, value addition and marketing as a high value crop for mitigation mechanism, both food security and income generation. mixed cropping system, cassava, food security Introduction Cassava is widely grown and has the potential to alleviate poverty in Uganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erin's Guide to Gulu
    Edited 10/2019 GHCE Global Health Clinical Elective 2020 GUIDE TO YOUR CLINICAL ELECTIVE IN Gulu, UGANDA Disclaimer: This booklet is provided as a service to UW students going to Gulu, Uganda, based on feedback from previous students. The Global Health Resource Center is not responsible for any inaccuracies or errors in the booklet's contents. Students should use their own common sense and good judgment when traveling, and obtain information from a variety of reliable sources. Please conduct your own research to ensure a safe and satisfactory experience. TABLE OF CONTENTS Contact Information 3 Entry Requirements 5 Country Overview 6 Packing Tips 8 Money 13 Communication 13 Travel to/from Gulu 14 Phrases 16 Food 16 Budgeting 17 Fun 17 Health and Safety Considerations 18 How not to make an ass of yourself 19 Map 21 Cultural Adjustment 24 Guidelines for the Management of Body Fluid Exposure 26 2 CONTACT INFORMATION - U.S. Name Address Telephone Email or Website UW In case of emergency: +1-206-632-0153 www.washington.edu/glob International 1. Notify someone in country (24-hr hotline) alaffairs/emergency/ Emergency # 2. Notify CISI (see below) 3. Call 24-hr hotline [email protected] 4. May call Scott/McKenna [email protected] GHCE Director(s) Dr. Scott +206-473-0392 [email protected] McClelland (Scott, cell) [email protected] 001-254-731- Dr. McKenna 490115 (Scott, Eastment Kenya) GHRC Director Daren Wade Harris Hydraulics +1-206-685-7418 [email protected] (office) Building, Room [email protected] #315 +1-206-685-8519 [email protected] 1510 San Juan (fax) Road Seattle, WA 98195 Insurance CISI 24/7 call center [email protected] available at 888-331- nce.com 8310 (toll-free) or 240-330-1414 (accepts Collect calls) Hall Health Anne Terry, 315 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Population by Parish
    Total Population by Sex, Total Number of Households and proportion of Households headed by Females by Subcounty and Parish, Northern Region, 2014 District Population Households % of Female Males Females Total Households Headed HHS Sub-County Parish Northern Region 3,480,381 3,707,751 7,188,132 1,349,162 24.7 Adjumani District 108,298 116,953 225,251 41,315 39.2 Adjumani Town Council 17,055 18,378 35,433 6,025 29.1 Biyaya 5,354 5,630 10,984 1,829 26.2 Central 5,758 6,225 11,983 2,074 30.1 Cesia 5,943 6,523 12,466 2,122 30.6 Adropi Sub County 5,839 5,875 11,714 2,268 23.8 Esia 1,370 1,470 2,840 563 19.9 Lajopi 891 913 1,804 372 26.3 Obilokongo 974 1,092 2,066 398 21.4 Openzinzi 1,221 964 2,185 404 27.2 Palemo 1,383 1,436 2,819 531 25.2 Arinyapi Sub County 5,754 5,914 11,668 2,225 27.7 Arasi 808 779 1,587 314 27.4 Elegu 1,209 1,269 2,478 479 30.7 Ituju 1,390 1,391 2,781 545 28.8 Liri 1,496 1,629 3,125 584 24.7 Zinyini 851 846 1,697 303 27.1 Ciforo Sub County 7,147 7,324 14,471 3,137 25.4 Agojo 964 1,043 2,007 428 28.3 Loa 1,824 1,829 3,653 835 25.9 Mugi 1,164 1,183 2,347 455 24.4 Okangali 1,906 1,930 3,836 832 24.5 Opejo 1,289 1,339 2,628 587 24.7 Dzaipi Sub County 20,167 22,721 42,888 8,024 51.0 Adidi 1,509 1,526 3,035 709 22.1 Ajugopi 11,580 13,459 25,039 4,158 66.4 Logoangwa 1,652 1,618 3,270 690 25.4 Mgbere 1,836 2,017 3,853 941 34.9 Miniki 3,590 4,101 7,691 1,526 43.8 Itirikwa Sub County 8,187 8,908 17,095 2,928 37.3 Baratuku 483 516 999 163 18.4 Itirikwa 665 654 1,319 232 15.1 Kolididi 1,070 1,157 2,227 281 19.2 Mungula 3,973 4,427
    [Show full text]
  • The Quad (The 2017 Alumni Magazine)
    THE QUAD | ALUMNI MAGAZINE | FALL 2017 Dedman CELEBRATING ALUMNI 30 Years of the Distinguished Alumni Awards YEARS OF DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI AWARD30 WINNERS THE QUAD | VOL 48 Dean Director of Alumni Relations Photographers SMU Dedman School of Law Jennifer M. Collins Abby N. Ruth ’06 Thomas Garza, Hillsman Office of Alumni Relations Jackson, Bret Redman P.O. Box 750116 Dallas, TX 75275-0116 Director of External Relations Managing Editor 214-768-4LAW(4529) Lynn M. Dempsey Patricia S. Heard Printer ColorDynamics Email: [email protected] Director of Writers & Contributors www.law.smu.edu Communications & Marketing Mark Curriden, Kristy A. Offenburger Patricia S. Heard, Brooks Igo The Quad is published for graduates and friends of the law school. Reproduction in whole or in part of this magazine without permission is prohibited. SMU will not discriminate in any program or activity on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, genetic information, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity and expression. The Executive Director for Access and Equity/Title IX Coordinator is designated to handle inquiries regarding nondiscrimination policies and may be reached at the Perkins Administration Building, Room 204, 6425 Boaz Lane, Dallas, TX 75205, 214-768-3601, [email protected]. Dedman SCHOOL OF LAW IN THIS ISSUE FALL 2017 Features 4 | 30th Annual Distinguished Alumni Awards A special evening honors six new award recipients and commemorates 30 years of winners and their enormous contributions to the law school, the profession and the community. 12 | Spring Break 2017: DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI Crayons as Contraband 4 Professor Natalie Nanasi and eight Dedman Law students volunteer at AWARD WINNERS Karnes County Residential Center to help immigrant mothers and children fleeing violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Policy Statement FY 2021-2022.Pdf
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION VOTE 023 and VOTE 110 MINISTERIAL POLICY STATEMENT PRESENTED TO THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA FOR THE DEBATE ON THE ESTIMATES OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES FOR FY 2021/2022 BY Dr. Elioda Tumwesigye (MP) Minister for Science, Technology and Innovation March 2021 ABBREVIATIONS ACTS African Centre for Technology Studies AIA Appropriation in Aid ARIPO Africa Regional Intellectual Property Organization BFP Budget Framework Paper BIRDC Banana Industrial Research and Development Centre Bn Billion BTDC Biosciences Technology Development Centre CHTC China High-Tech Corporation DLGs District Local Governments DTTCS District Technology Transfer Centers EASTECO East African Science and Technology Commission EOC Equal Opportunities Commission FY Financial year GOU Government of Uganda ICT Information and Communications Technology IEC Information Education and Communication INASP International network for the Availability of Scientific Publications IP Intellectual Property IPRs Intellectual Property Rights IPRs Intellectual Property Rights ISO International Standards Organization KCCA Kampala Capital City Authority KMC Kiira Motors Corporation LGs Local Governments M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies MoFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MoPS Ministry of Public Service MoSTI Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation MOU Memorandum of Understanding MoWE Ministry of Water and Environment MPS Ministerial Policy
    [Show full text]
  • Omoro District Local Government
    Omoro District Nutrition coordination A Link Nutrition Causal Analysis (Link NCA) CALL TO ACTION committee (DNCC), six (6) Sub counties and was conducted to establish the various causal THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA One Town council trained on multi sectoral pathways for malnutrition in Omoro district. NUTRITION CHALLENGES/ GAPS CALL FOR ACTION RESPONSIBLE nutrition implementation for improved nutrition The information generated from this study is GOVERNANCE AREA OFFICE outcomes. important in designing context specific nutrition OMORO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT Coordination and Weak coordination mechanisms of multi- Regularly Assess the functionality of DNFP, interventions in the district and formulate partnerships: sectoral nutrition activities at district and Nutrition Coordination Committees at all Administration ADVOCACY BRIEF ON STRENGTHENING NUTRITION GOVERNANCE FOR MULTI-SECTORAL RESPONSE The district conducted quarterly DNCC meetings customized action plans. sub-county levels. levels. Orient DNCC/SNCC members on and support supervision activities aimed at their roles and responsibilities strengthening the accountability framework for A Stakeholder Mapping and Capacity Multisectoral nutrition actions implemented in Assessment exercise was also conducted to Low attendance of DNCC members and Partner mapping list should be updated to DNFP, CAO Omoro district. examine institutional arrangements and capacity stakeholders in the multi-sectoral nutrition know who is doing what and where. activities (DNCC support supervision and to plan, budget
    [Show full text]
  • Summarized Tribunal Report
    Summarized Tribunal Report On 15th May 2013, Hon. Frank Tumwebaze, the Minister of the Presidency, who is also the Minister in charge of Kampala Capital City, received a Petition from Seventeen (17) councilors of the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA). The Petition set out grounds upon which the Councillors sought the removal of Mr. Erias Lukwago from his position as Lord Mayor of Kampala Capital City. The allegations levelled against the Lord Mayor were; abuse of office, misconduct or misbehaviour and Incompetence. On receipt of the Petition, the Hon. Minister in consultation with the Chief Justice, constituted a Tribunal to investigate the allegations contained in the Petition. The Tribunal members were Honourable Lady Justice Catherine Bamugemereire, Mrs. Joska Ocaya-Lakidi and Mr. Alfred Okello Oryem. The Terms of Reference of the Tribunal, in addition to setting out a time-frame of two months for its operation, specified that a decision was to be reached as to whether the Petition’s assertions could support a prima facie case for the removal of the Lord Mayor. The Tribunal further noted that the Petition seeking the removal of Mr. Erias Lukwago from his elective position of Lord Mayor of Kampala Capital City, was a matter of great public interest which had created an atmosphere of collective euphoria within sections of the population of Kampala. The sheer gravity and the far reaching ramifications of this exercise compelled the Tribunal to subject the evidence adduced before to such rigour and care as akin to the standard ordinarily applied to election petitions. Indeed whilst the standard of proof applied by the Tribunal was not beyond reasonable doubt as required in criminal cases it was a lot higher than proof on a balance of probabilities which is the accepted standard of proof in cases of a civil nature such as this one.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Semi-Annual Monitoring Report FY2020/21
    HEALTH SECTOR SEMI-ANNUAL BUDGET MONITORING REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 2020/21 MAY 2021 Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development P.O. Box 8147, Kampala www.finance.go.ug MOFPED #DoingMore Health Sector: Semi-Annual Budget Monitoring Report - FY 2020/21 A HEALTH SECTOR SEMI-ANNUAL BUDGET MONITORING REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 2020/21 MAY 2021 MOFPED #DoingMore Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................iv FOREWORD.........................................................................................................................vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY........................................................................................2 2.1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................3 2.2.1 Sampling .........................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]