s e i r e S
y c i l o P h t l a e 1 H 5 e p o r
u
s E c
i n l n
o i b
i c e
l t i c s u o l n a h p a b
o t m z c s i i l g u e s a o l
n , e d n p y r e
i
b a v t l i f e s a u s o g x s i i Q o t e r s r b -
r d b z o o e n e r o p o e i
d n
p e c k f l r o n i e s s p á o o e l h h
d w s n o e R e p d m r r
s o n e i t t h K a e r e A e b y t a : c c s t
r l l
h d l r H g u y e
n c a a e M o t k i a b
a R
a e a a a c S M R a N n n n n
d
i d i J i
t e a a t a l n u n d e t r e e e h s c r i n n e i i n k l a o n h e n r r l l d n n E E C A A B E M E C T a O h i h T
9 ORGANIZATION AND FINANCING OF PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES IN EUROPE COUNTRY REPORTS 4 , , , l f t y s s s g e e e o , l h I s n l a
r o t t e s e . o n n n s r
l d o c m i i i l r a c e i h h y o e a r i y i e s n a o n 97 89289 051712 n t t m r t , o l
t v c l e
o c c s c t a a e r i c s
i s c l e p a n h t l , . p t e l n . e . r
e y m y e x p r e . h s s e s o n i s
a u s s s c c e t o m S e
o
s e y d e i i u e c
P r H
s e r i . e o r i f t l
i l l h e i h i f S d l e d n r h T s c f t t c c
t c o b b o d
m c i i m t c t i
l i
a o i o
n l e i e n l n l l h s u u e n
l p e l i n a & . n l s t P o a g p t
i a
o o t b m
a N h o l p n
o e , r
o h
e p n i P n e e e s c d P t u o i
d a P t
r
h s P y s o
e e r o y
e
t
l n h l a n t H P e d n l i l m s f e d
t p y c d h i l a e p S d s
t s m h a
i a n o
r i s n H t n d , n
e l t n a e
r s f a n u t
e e a
g h r r
n o m , a g s
o n b t t a z h e h n i
o o a
t n t y
d
i
e o i i s u a l
a n t s u a c s y y o
a i u . m r s
s v
n n v n s H p s y a r r a e w p s
m k o e
h a n y e h t a o s r o m a n e e f o z S m f t o
m i r r e t c v a
i e t , e g
n e g m g w l d o o
t t s e . o : H e p o
p l
r t g r h n a e
t
e
l u s c t a a y t e a m e e t f e s g s
v t o a l o s a t s y l y s - e s i o o e l a c
d S r p o y
h s n
h y u g s n c
y a a , v o S n c h i h u n t M e h i u
o
y r r
S r
h n
o t p l f S e n t
c S t o r h s e
w
e t
h f f e o l i c i S e
i e d o o p o
l c i n h
u t H b h v e i m o s o h h a l
l s n c 1 t d s p e p p a i h
t a r r S h t E t
l
s e l O e l
a
g n b t b l S e o i n
i t c e e c n o l a
e a o l 5 r i f e i a l h n o n a v u a w l a O a e n
C t l
i
a i f H
h e
h
a
u
o e m t o
e p o a
p H y . a y d t c b e
m h
n
s D n s e H d o i e r x n d c , h
H d n e i e
H t l i e n u c
h
s
a
H e r o s h n e o . o d , n
e n e t r a p i n
a .
o e c b r n e t p e
i
c d n f
a y o o h i r l a u
o y o e e e e s c a a o a u i e b e p n o
y o n t r r i r L
v r r N
t
i e o i h
n n c t r
h v l e e s y
p r o
o i R r r y u t t o y l a h s t n r
o P a r
n t r o o e
. t r b
a
t e
i r c t l f . o . a t E c r e o e )
n o e t e
s e s t u h
d
n o s i a u e b o s d i i e e u o t a
p s a
t l e y t R s R a
t e h s v E , s e
o
i e p a c n v n n
m a i e h e t b t p s r g t z a e s
i a i s m h e r s c
s
i r t h d a v v i S e e M v f r
v , r t
e n e e
a l
v c
h i O c e e l , a r p
, a
n
r i i l y t l r h r t ) r o
o A s o s e m a h e s W l
e b o D n b (
t h a t f e n a a d
d
t e y
n c
e m b e r s
, . t s t b e g a s r o e i g s e c t m c a t e i s e l a y e t e e r s t u h e s e i r
O n n n l b O e
l I i s a s a e e r b
i a b
c t i t c
m
p h p n E S
i M e i M O p c y v S ,
O b
n
p r d
e a s w l n l O
i a t
O o n l : b y T o
l o l
l y r
l t t I e t o S
e a d o s i i a o r o m h H s n
a o n .
e a a r n o n r e
n t b s n s o . c e e y n e t h u p e P f v a n o d e i k c l c
a p
a c r u a a e b u o W u i ,
i s l a p
c f p v i
E n e c l
o h c n
i i e
c e
l l d e f d . c r i i E h p e n p o p o
f
n m
r y t p u E i m s a n t t g c p o r r n b e p d
d
f O
r o o h o i l o e o c o e l
o e a p a f i v n o r u i r t f u a i s u o s e a h t o o f g e r
r
t t
h l
r h f c t h r o T o T a t t n
o i f e E i E
n
P d t n o u t s i s
l s G
g e
o n
c u l
a l i u O o p
i o c n
i o e e
r r c t
e & E s a , c &
i
m e n n n P i b o s E l i s
E s
i i g e i
P e a o
a e t v h s s e n a o h f a s o u h
r a e e l e
e e i c o b r i
m t h e n f e t e b a m r c
. n a i r e e
h
o p t s t n v a n h c n n e g o
t
h s z r h a t f o e
O o e n t a h - c s p l s r i
c p o l t e e e y i a
t a n i S e
l i c l w a i d i n
r
n a
r p i r
a o t t c a e s
S n t o i f
n
t r i
i r
e g a r R g o g o d r o - f i o o o h s a a d l
a o e e
e a
y f f y . y m t n e c F r t b w
n u c s s e a
z s s )
) u r m g
l
m i i u c c i h i r a e o s , l i o O o u c a R r E E i H H i d a e v
n e n i a t
v i
s t n
u t r v l f n
o c w d b d i
o l E f f f f f s o n c f r g e o h d e
s s t
c O
n e o s a f i n i n i n u s n o i o o o o o a
d e f y y e c i c f d A O
t
h
a l H e g p o
H
o ( O r v h a l l n l f
s r s t e a o d
e r
e
R a l r c
n m
n f s l f l
H
r L h a
o r o o o i o v i b i O
y n o h W n i g s o u i o f
o l h
a c o w
o p h t e r o O o t i o i i l
s e e
t
c a r t O o t f i t n o
D h
t e r e h s
a n l S r t
s h h n h a
l h y u H h a a r u d s t
c l t a n E o h e t h g a a v a t c c a e p c l e a h l z
r ( e e t
o e
Q n
t z d f s i o
W
n
e e e R e a t i c S S S e
S t c i s u a -
i h
n t o
b
d m r s o r i n r s n s t I h e a t n e s e a l z h e r s
k e d L
s n o n n o o e n a a h
. e i a
e a i o
h r a e h s e f f h b i R
o P t n
e d o o c o
a e f e r r g
e c d t i
t r R g
e
o n d i o u a o
c a r e h s d d
s d h r t o s l u e h i h l r
k g i f y i e i t
d
o R s t n p
s i l r o t t e n n w n r p
c n o i
g s l O n
n P
t
s h s e
n t t á
a o e i b t o e r o s
o l a l R d u h t a n e r o s i n
h w a
v d s d s i s n b n
a u L s L L o e
e g t e v i n e o w o
t a
r
r n e
r s r d f
o , o s n
l u e s n v h p
i o c h o c o K l e e e i a
o
H o e e d s s c n t
r a l e e l b l o a o r e
e a
i i f y
t c c t y h i h n h
r l h e e e i a t t o a l n a r h u c e c H g S s g
e
t i o t t e
i
c i t
a d c a
t g - , p n a , i a a M o l k e h i , g a m c e b t
t
t a l R y a e i u p e i y d
s z
o n o
e e a b e l l n d r n M r t i S R s a a N a t n o r l n n
h
l
c i s
i
i n e e i i t t J d i i p u m o s o i
n t
n l c m
u P
t a a a c t o b l n d d r d
o
s
l n n n w o d o i P
e P a a i r r s e s E s c
o n n r e r e e r e s b l e d i d a d
i u t u c o i i d e k l g i c a r s d s s d r
e o h n n l l u r r
o u b n c n r n h c h n o o h e h p t i a a a n o n E E T c c I a G o a E T P o a p A c ( t T a a M E C A A B c a b b M a b © World Health Organization 2018 (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies) All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
Address requests about publications to: Publications, WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies or any of its partners.
The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance Country reports (online appendix)
European
on Health Systems and Policies a partnership hosted by WHO Contents
page page
1 England 3 5 The Netherlands 114 Obesity John Middleton 3 Obesity Hans Maarse, Maria Jansen, Alcohol John Middleton 13 Mariëlle Jambroes and Dirk Ruwaard 114 Antimicrobial resistance John Middleton, Alcohol Hans Maarse, Maria Jansen, Ellen Bloomer 24 Mariëlle Jambroes and Dirk Ruwaard 117 Antimicrobial resistance Hans Maarse, 2 France 36 Maria Jansen, Mariëlle Jambroes and Dirk Ruwaard 121 Obesity Michel Chauliac, Laurent Chambaud, 6 Poland Cristina Hernández-Quevedo 36 124 Alcohol Nicolas Prisse, Laurent Chambaud, Obesity Michał Brzeziński 124 Cristina Hernández-Quevedo 45 Alcohol Aleksandra Kuich, Łukasz Balwicki, Antimicrobial resistance Pascal Astagneau, Anna Sagan 131 Laurent Chambaud, Cristina Hernández-Quevedo 55 Antimicrobial resistance Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach, Tomasz Bochenek, Anna Sagan 137 3 Germany 64 7 Republic of Moldova Obesity Klaus Plümer 64 150 Alcohol Klaus Plümer 71 Obesity Galina Obreja 150 Antimicrobial resistance Klaus Plümer 79 Alcohol Marcela Tirsea, Angela Ciobanu, Jarno Habicht 157
4 Italy 88 Antimicrobial resistance Stela Gheorghita 164 Obesity Elena Azzolini, Walter Ricciardi 88 8 Slovenia 172 Alcohol Andrea Poscia, Walter Ricciardi 96 Antimicrobial resistance Kerstin Vesna Petrič 172 Antimicrobial resistance Daniele Ignazio La Milia, Walter Ricciardi 105 9 Sweden 179 Obesity Bo Burström, Cristina Hernández-Quevedo 179 Alcohol Bo Burström, Anna Sagan 185 Antimicrobial resistance Bo Burström, Cristina Hernández-Quevedo 193 England 3 England
Obesity
John Middleton
The scale of the challenge
The National Child Measurement Programme for The recognition of obesity as a national problem in 2014/15 found that around one in 10 children in school England emerged in the late 1990s. Public interest in reception year (aged 4–5 years) in England was obese obesity accelerated, as indicated by the volume of press (boys 9.7%, girls 8.8%). By year 6 (aged 10–11 years), stories on the subject, from the end of the 1990s (HM around one in five children was obese (boys 20.4%, girls Government, 2004: 11). Reasons given for obesity 17.4%), where child obesity is defined as a body mass rates have included genetic theories, the obesogenic index (BMI) ≥ 95th centile of the UK 1990 growth chart environment (Egger and Swinburn, 1997) and the (National Obesity Observatory, 2016). There are stark “calories in – calories out” line exemplified by the Fore inequalities in levels of child obesity, with prevalence sight report. Foresight also highlighted the obesogenic among children in the most deprived areas of England environment, the life-course component and the being double that of children in the least deprived areas generational dimension, with parental obesity being a (National Obesity Observatory, 2016). predictor of childhood obesity. The most significant predictor of childhood obesity was identified as parental Treating obesity and its consequences is currently obesity, which increased the risk of childhood obesity by estimated to cost the National Health Service (NHS) 10% (Foresight, 2007). 6.1 billion pounds sterling every year. It is one of the risk factors for type 2 diabetes, which accounts for The “calories in – calories out” model has been helpful spending of 8.8 billion pounds sterling a year, almost to industries selling high-sugar products, as they have 9% of the NHS budget (House of Commons Health been able to maintain the line that there are “no bad Committee, 2015). The wider costs of obesity to society foods only bad diets”. More recently, in England, there are estimated to be around three times this amount. By has been a resurgence of interest in sugars as a causal contrast, the UK spends only around 638 million pounds factor for obesity. Under this theory propounded by John sterling on obesity prevention programmes (Health Select Yudkin (1972) and resurrected by Lustig and others, not Committee, 2015). all calories are equal – although sugary foods may not be as high calorie as fats, their effect on obesity may be In 2007 the government’s Foresight report charted the profound through their impact on insulin sensitivity rapid rise in obesity in the UK. It showed that by 2050 as they have a high glycaemic index (Lustig, 2014). over half of the UK adult population could be obese. This interest has encouraged systematic reviews of By 2050 the costs to the NHS were projected to double the role of sugar in obesity and diabetes (Te Morenga, to 10 billion pounds sterling per year, while the wider 2013) and a report by Public Health England on the costs to society and business were estimated to reach evidence for action (Tedstone et al., 2015). In England, 49.9 billion pounds sterling per year (at 2007 prices) the government has recently (2015) accepted the (Foresight, 2007). Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition’s (SACN’s) recommendations and revised national dietary guidelines 4 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
on carbohydrate and health for the first time in 20 years aim was to halt the year-on-year increase in obesity rates (SACN, 2015). among 11-year-olds by 2010 in the context of a broader strategy to tackle obesity in the population as a whole. “Choosing health” also introduced the new public health Policies and programmes staff group: “health trainers”. The idea drawn from the private sector was for a “personal trainer” for everyone The first English health improvement strategy, Health with “lifestyle problems”, particularly supporting those in of the Nation (1992), had five priorities – coronary heart poorer communities who would never be able to afford disease reduction, cancer prevention, accident prevention, such services otherwise. suicide prevention and HIV/AIDS and sexual health. Obesity hardly featured. By the time the Public Health The Foresight report (Foresight, 2007), as mentioned in Green Paper, “Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation” The scale of the challenge section, raised the profile of (OHN) appeared in 1999, obesity had been recognized obesity as a national health problem even further and as a new priority. modelled scenarios of the growth of obesity and diabetes, through to 2050. It mapped the complexities of factors OHN argued for a whole generation approach from causing obesity and went into detail on obesogenic pregnancy through childhood, adulthood and later life. environments and sedentary lifestyles. This prompted It saw the need for combined actions by individuals, local the Department of Health initiative on Healthy Towns communities and government to improve health, and in 2008, focusing on healthy town planning, encouraging proposed healthy schools and healthy workplaces. In this active travel and accessible physical activity (Cross- approach, a whole generation is needed to reduce the Government Obesity Unit, 2009). In 2008, there was impact of such factors as smoking, poor nutrition, obesity also an ambitious cross-government strategy for England and physical inactivity. Fundamentally it recognized the called “Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives”, which set out to inequalities in the distribution of adverse behaviours and reverse increasing prevalence of obesity and overweight the need to tackle the underlying social, economic and in the population by ensuring that everyone was able environmental conditions (HM Government, 1999). The to achieve and maintain a healthy weight. The initial link between obesity, health variables and socioeconomic focus was on children, with the target of reducing the inequality was further highlighted in the Wanless Report proportion of overweight and obese children to 2000 (2002) which contributed to the debate and development levels by 2020 (Department of Health, 2008). of policy in this area. In April 2007, broadcasting restrictions to significantly In the 1990s, there was split responsibility for nutrition reduce the exposure of children to television advertising in government – the Food Standards Agency, an of foods high in fat, saturated fat, salt and sugar were independent government department, had a significant introduced. The Food Standards Agency worked across role in diet and nutrition surveillance, policy, research government and with academics, industry, and non and service delivery, including supporting the voice of the governmental organizations (NGOs) to develop the consumer around dietary health; their Nutrition Division nutrient profiling model which was implemented from was moved into the Department of Health only in 2010 2010. This model is a tool to differentiate foods which to consolidate policy and programme delivery in England are high in fat, saturated fat, salt or sugar and can be used (Blackshaw, 2016). by the media and communications regulator (Ofcom) to regulate the advertising and promotion of foods to By 2004, obesity was centre stage in the government children (Department of Health and Social Care, 2011a). White Paper “Choosing health: making healthy choices easier” but the emphasis was on supporting individuals Under the coalition government (in place in 2010–2015) to change their behaviours and on (primary care trusts’) any central government pressure to control irresponsible role in reducing inequalities, whereas OHN put in fast food advertising dissipated. Organizational change place a raft of supporting structures and initiatives to created further uncertainty with regard to investment improve health – Health Action Zones, Healthy Living in obesity programmes, culminating in the transfer Centres, expert patients. The 2004 White Paper also set of public health departments to local authorities out a Public Service Agreement (PSA) on child obesity from 2013. For many involved in the organizational and included measures to improve school meals and the upheaval, it became difficult to plan and develop new development of the Healthy Schools Programme. The England 5
services, or advocate for national policy changes, such Public Health England (PHE) published its physical as the regulation of marketing of fast food to children. activity evidence base and strategy in late 2014 (Public Furthermore, under the Health and Social Care Act Health England, 2014). This comprehensive review 2012, certain public health services were mandated to described levels of inactivity and inequalities and set out be provided or commissioned by local authority public four domains for getting society to be more active (Public health services. However, obesity prevention and weight Health England, 2014): management were not among the mandated services. • active society: creating a social movement; More recently, the major national health policy effort • moving professionals: activating networks of with regard to food and, to a lesser extent, physical expertise; activity and alcohol was wrapped up in voluntary agreements with industry in the form of the “Public • active environments: creating the right spaces; Health Responsibility Deal” (Department of Health, • moving at scale: interventions that make us active. 2011). Introduced in 2011 after publication of the public health White Paper and with reforms moving towards the Another noteworthy initiative is NHS England’s Healthy Health and Social Care Act of 2012, the Responsibility New Towns which aims to promote the building of new Deal was intended to be a partnership between healthy environments from scratch, with 10 demonstrator government, industry and public health organizations to housing developments across England in 2016 (NHS agree interventions by industry which would demonstrate England, 2016; Leeds Beckett University, 2015). their corporate social responsibility and promote health. However, the homepage (https://responsibilitydeal.dh.gov. The NHS Commissioning Board produced commis uk/) praises relatively marginal action by industry, such sioning guidelines for weight management in 2013 as new formulations of ultra-processed food or small (NHS Commissioning Board, 2013). Its successor body, changes in alcohol marketing practices, while providing NHS England, along with Public Health England, in industry with a platform to gain credibility and free 2014 produced advice on commissioning obesity services advertising. There was an overarching Responsibility (NHS England, 2014). Both documents refer to the Deal forum chaired by a senior civil servant and specific Tiers Model for obesity management. Tiers 1 and 2 Responsibility Deal forums dealing with alcohol, food, are seen as the preventive and early intervention tiers, physical activity and health in the workplace. Researchers generally through services funded by local authorities. from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Tier 3 involves clinical, non-surgical interventions, were commissioned to evaluate the initiative. They such as behavioural psychology and dietetics, and tier noted at the outset how the disparate and wide-ranging 4 is bariatric surgery which is NHS-funded. However, pledges suggested by industry presented a complex set of in practice there is scope to locally determine sources interventions of which it would be all but impossible to of funding and whether to establish pooled budgets. assess the effectiveness (Petticrew et al., 2013). They also Buoyed by findings of the Lighten Up study (Jolly et al., reviewed 47 evaluations of previous voluntary agreements 2011), weight management services provided by Weight with industry and concluded that effective voluntary Watchers, Rosemary Conley and other commercial agreements are based on clearly defined, evidence-based providers are also being commissioned by local authority and quantifiable targets, which require partners to go public health departments. beyond “business as usual”, and include penalties for not delivering the pledges (Bryden et al., 2013). The UK’s first food labelling regulation came into force in 1996. Front-of-pack nutrition information was first Many public health lobby organizations did not take part introduced by the food industry in the UK in 2005. in the Responsibility Deal; more left the initiative in 2013 To date, two systems have been used, Guideline daily when it became clear that government commitments amounts (GDAs) and Traffic-light colour coding. As part to legislate on plain packaging for cigarettes and on a of the Responsibility Deal, in June 2013 standardized minimum unit price for alcohol were sidelined and that front-of-package labelling developed by the Food behind-the-scenes lobbying by industry was preventing Standards Agency was introduced by those companies meaningful interventions by government, such as that had signed up to the voluntary pledge, including effective legislation, taxation and regulation. a traffic-light coding scheme for energy, salt, sugar and 6 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
fat. With the voluntary scheme, the UK has gone beyond In January 2018, PHE launched the Change4Life European Union (EU) harmonized nutrition labelling, campaign. The campaign addresses the problem that, which does so far not provide for interpretative systems on average, half of children’s sugar intake comes from such as colour coding. unhealthy snacks and sugary drinks. The Change4Life campaign encourages parents to look for “100 calorie The national Office of Communications (Ofcom) is snacks, two a day max!” to help them purchase healthier the independent regulator of television, radio, tele snacks than the ones they currently buy. communications and wireless communications services in the UK and sets standards for television advertising. Its regulatory objectives include the protection of children Problem identification and issue under the age of 16 from the overconsumption of high recognition fat, salt and sugar foods. Since 2006, Ofcom does not The Secretary of State for Health and the Department of allow TV advertisements for such foods to be shown in or Health are responsible for setting public health policy for around programmes specifically made for children (which England. PHE is the national public health body charged includes preschool children) or in or around programmes with policy formulation and implementation; it advises of particular appeal to children under 16. The UK’s the Department of Health on what policy should be statutory ban on television advertising of foods high in taken and provides advice to local authorities, the NHS fats, sugar and salt during children’s programming was and others, on implementation. In 2013, PHE sought a world first. It broke new ground for imposing more the views of the Directors of Public Health on what the stringent conditions on the food and drink industries. priorities should be for PHE to tackle obesity in local communities; the output of this work helped to inform PHE produced their evidence for action on sugar the PHE obesity workplan mentioned in the Policies and reduction in November 2015 (Public Health England, programmes section (Public Health England, 2014). PHE 2015). In March 2016, the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s also published advice on early approaches to tackling budget statement launched a surprise introduction of a obesity (Public Health England, 2013). tax on sugar-sweetened drinks, which has been welcomed by the public health community. The revenue raised is to The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition be committed to more physical activity in schools. (SACN) is an advisory committee of independent experts which provides scientific advice on, and risk assessment An action plan on tackling childhood obesity, “Childhood of, nutrition and related health issues. It advises the obesity: a plan for action”, was adopted in August 2016, governments of all four UK countries. covering the period 2016–2026. Its key anticipated actions include the introduction of a levy on the soft Other UK government departments have key roles to drinks industry and the encouragement of the foods and play in obesity policy, including the Department for drinks industry to voluntarily reduce the sugar content Education, the Department of Culture, Media and Sport of their products. The overall emphasis on voluntary (physical activity and control of advertising/marketing action and the failure to include further restrictions standards), the Department for Communities and Local to advertising aimed at children in the action plan Government, and the Department for Environment, were criticized by public health experts and attributed Food and Rural Affairs. to sustained lobbying by industry against regulatory measures. While PHE supported a sugar tax and Local authorities are the lead body responsible for reductions in the sugar content of foods, it had argued forming statutory Health and Wellbeing Boards which that banning price-cutting promotions of junk food comprise local authority cabinet members for public in supermarkets, banning the promotion of unhealthy health, children and adult’s social services, GP members foods to children in restaurants, cafes and takeaways, of the local Clinical Commissioning Group, the local and further restricting advertising of unhealthy food to HealthWatch patient’s rights organization, and other children on TV, social media and the Internet were more health-related interests agreed by local partners. Priorities effective measures of tackling childhood obesity. These for Health and Wellbeing Boards are determined locally, measures were lacking in the action plan (Boseley, 2016). but a survey of senior local government members in 2015 indicated that childhood obesity remained a priority England 7
and that more needed to be done (Local Government Policy formulation Association, 2015). In the area of obesity, the Department of Health is in charge of policy development at the national level, with Local authority public health departments are responsible PHE responsible for helping to inform national policy for assessing the level of need with regard to obesity and and for supporting delivery through the local public for advocating effective interventions at the local level. health and health system. NHS England is now taking a They hold the budget for services for healthy public greater interest given the expectations for preventing ill- policy interventions, including obesity prevention and health in their Five Year Forward View. PHE and NHS early intervention. It is up to local authorities to decide England both see obesity as a major priority (Public how well programmes are funded and what interventions Health England 2014b; NHS England, 2014b) and both are chosen, on what evidence, and relative to other are leading organizations in policy formulation. PHE competing local needs. develops, translates and assembles evidence, prepares policy advice and oversees surveillance data for England Local authorities (unitary, metropolitan councils and on all aspects of obesity. The chief medical officers district councils within counties) are also the lead of the UK’s four countries have written guidance on agency for food safety and inspection, the provision and physical activity (Department of Health and Social Care, commissioning of leisure services, and town planning. 2011b) and on alcohol consumption (Department of Local authority departments for environmental health Health, 2016). The Chief Medical Officer for England and trading standards oversee some aspects of consumer called for a discussion of a sugar tax in 2013. However, protection, but have been subject to severe cutbacks in all the agencies and organizations identified above recent years as part of austerity policies. In some local (see the Problem identification and issue recognition authorities, there have been efforts to move food hygiene section) are involved in the formulation of policies. Local and safety inspection towards food quality inspection to authorities, through their Health and Wellbeing Boards address obesity and coronary heart disease (Saunders et and public health departments, are charged with local al., 2014; Middleton and Saunders, 2015). needs assessment and local policy formulation. The Fingertips information system managed by PHE is a NGOs play a strong role in lobbying, policy advocacy major intelligence resource for local authority public and services on food, fitness and healthy environments. health (http://fingertips.phe.org.uk/search/obesity). One of the longest established actors is the National Obesity Forum, a charity formed in 2000, with the remit of raising awareness of obesity in the UK and promoting Decision-making ways in which it can be addressed. This includes public initiatives and the training of clinicians and health The Secretary of State for Health, the Department of professionals on how to identify and address weight Health and PHE set obesity health policies for England, management issues and obesity (National Obesity Forum, but it is anticipated that the National Obesity Strategy 2016). The Obesity Health Alliance is a relatively new will be cross-governmental and be owned by the Cabinet. body seeking to coordinate policy lobbying. It is hosted Local authorities are free to determine local policies, by the Royal College of Physicians. To date, it comprises based on needs. principally health professional bodies and some NGOs. The Department of Health and PHE are seen as leaders The industry and the private sector is also involved in a of obesity-related policy at the national level. However, number of initiatives. Change4Life (http://www.nhs.uk/ the delay in bringing forward a National Obesity Strategy change4life), the national lifestyle health advice website is thought to be due to the necessity of securing support, and supporting resources, was established in 2008. It and action, from all government departments for the comes with a contribution from private sector industries, strategy and for ownership of the strategy from the but is now managed by PHE. Commercial weight Cabinet and prime-ministerial level. management services such as Weight Watchers and Rosemary Conley are increasingly being commissioned by local authority public health services, instead of or alongside NHS-provided services. 8 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
Policy implementation second tier councils within large county authorities. The district council portfolio includes town planning, At the local level, local authorities are free to implement housing, environmental health and trading standards local policies. Local government seeks to manage obesity- and leisure and therefore will have a strong interest in related problems through its management of public obesity. Health and Wellbeing Boards have the potential health services, environmental licensing, consumer to deliver joint programmes on obesity, through policies, protection and social care and through its partnerships as well as directly managed or commissioned services. with health and community organizations. Since 2013, the responsibility of local authorities for public health has meant that they provide or commission client services, Monitoring and evaluation including weight management and local preventive campaigns and services. Public health agencies are PHE has a role in the overall monitoring of obesity vital, but their ability to act and be accepted in local prevalence and other important lifestyle factors, including partnerships is variable, depending on how their host dietary habits, through the National Diet and Nutrition councils view their importance and whether they view Survey (NDNS) (https://www.gov.uk/government/ obesity as a priority. statistics/national-diet-and-nutrition-survey-results-from- years-1-to-4-combined-of-the-rolling-programme-for- Local authorities have a progressively declining influence 2008-and-2009-to-2011-and-2012). on schools, which are now directly funded from central government as well as from local authorities. Many The National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) schools have moved entirely out of local authority control measures the height and weight of children in school and authorities have been forced to divest themselves of reception year (aged 4–5 years) and year 6 (aged 10–11 many advisory functions, and of support services such as years) to assess overweight and obesity levels in children school meals. in primary schools. Children’s heights and weights are measured and used to calculate a BMI centile. These Local authority funding to obesity services has not kept data can be used to support local public health initiatives pace with the level of need. For example, there are over and inform the local planning and delivery of services for 1.2 million people in England with a BMI of over 40, but children. Child obesity data from the NCMP 2006/2007 only about 8 000 bariatric procedures per year. However, to 2014/2015 are now available online as a child obesity with levels of obesity and overweight at more than 60% data tool for local authorities. The tool presents trend of the adult population, it is clear that individual and data and enables easy comparison of local authority therapeutic interventions will not be sufficient to solve data, allowing users to compare regional neighbours the challenge of obesity. Faced with funding cuts, many and local authorities with similar characteristics. The local authorities are looking at obesity services as a tool now includes inequalities data (by sex, deprivation likely area to cut. Weight management services, often and ethnic group) by local authority and information on provided by private sector organizations, look particularly the density of fast food outlets. These data are collected vulnerable. Birmingham has already announced that it and analysed by the National Obesity Observatory. The will stop funding for weight management services. National Obesity Observatory is now part of Public Health England’s knowledge and intelligence function, Local authorities (in charge of public health, as well which helps to assimilate evidence into relevant and as adult and children social care) and NHS Clinical useful analytical and evidential tools for the local system, Commissioning Groups are able to collaborate including the dataset for local authorities known as through the Health and Wellbeing Boards, and Fingertips (Public Health England, 2015). through recommendations for the annual report of the Director of Public Health and the joint strategic needs There are also Public Health Outcomes Framework assessment. Different Health and Wellbeing Boards profiles for the nine regions of England which collate may have different membership based on the different local authority indicators for breast feeding rates, physical configuration of local services and may consider different activity, fruit consumption, life expectancy and diet- partners relevant to their decisions, e.g. the food industry related cancers (http://www.phoutcomes.info/search/ and agricultural interests may be relevant in some obesity#page/0/gid/1/pat/15/par/E92000001/ati/6/are/ areas. Some Health and Wellbeing Boards do include E12000005). representation from district councils – the so-called England 9
Other relevant national surveys include the Health Survey a licensing arrangement exists for food industries wishing for England, the Active People Survey, the National to badge their foods as part of the “5 A Day” programme Travel Survey and the Labour Force Survey. There are (Public Health England, 2016c). also a wide range of web-based resources and infographics available from UK public health sources, including NHS Choices is a major online public and patient Change4Life (http://www.nhs.uk/change4life), the 5-A- health information resource. Its information base on Day advice (http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/5ADAY/Pages/ obesity is extensive, and written in accessible English Tips.aspx), the Eatwell Guide (https://www.gov.uk/ (NHS Choices, 2014). There is also a specific weight loss government/publications/the-eatwell-guide) and the NHS support guide (NHS Choices, 2014b). Choices website (http://www.nhs.uk/pages/home.aspx). National monitoring also undergoes public scrutiny. The Change4Life, the national social marketing campaign National Audit Office first picked up on obesity as a promoting healthy lifestyles, was established in 2008 national priority in its report in 2001 (NAO, 2001). It (Change4Life, 2018). It is part of a portfolio of lifestyle- produced a further report on childhood obesity in 2007, focused campaigns, which are the responsibility of PHE and an update on the government’s approach to tackling and which now includes the adult One You campaign. obesity in 2012 (NAO, 2012). The Parliamentary Health Its obesity-related materials are extensive; both the Select Committee, which provides scrutiny to govern Change4Life and One You campaigns have raised ment policies and strategies reported in the Health Select significant in-kind investment from the food, leisure and Committee, continues to scrutinize childhood obesity entertainment industry. A Sugar Smart app was launched and the national strategy on physical activity and diet early in 2016 (https://www.nhs.uk/change4life/food-facts/ (House of Commons Health Committee, 2015). Most sugar). While this was a welcome innovation, there are recently, it joined calls for bold action on childhood still technical glitches (as the database for recognizing obesity to help protect young people and future the bar codes of common foods is still limited). There generations, including through curbing the excesses of has also been criticism of its proximity to industries food and marketing industries and implementing a sugar viewed as guilty of causing the obesity crisis (Devlin, tax (UK Parliament, 2015a; 2015b). 2009), although internationally it has been viewed more favourably than other campaigns (Puhl et al., 2013). Conclusion and outlook The Eatwell Guide published in March 2016 (Public The story of obesity and public health policy development Health England, 2016a) has responded to consumer in England is one of so-called slow burn: late recognition opinion and has removed junk foods high in fat, salt of the problem, followed by action directed mainly and sugar from the plate and placed them into a separate at individuals, blaming them for not changing their corner with the text “Eat less and in small amounts”. lifestyles. Successive governments have acknowledged There is a new recommendation that the consumption the seriousness of obesity, but they have tinkered of fruit juice and smoothies should be limited to 150 ml around the edges, in effect blaming individuals for their per day and count as one portion of the “5 A Day” overweight, offering inadequately funded behaviour (regardless of how much is consumed or contained in one and treatment services, and avoiding regulatory action. serving). The protein section heading begins with non- Government relationships with industry have been close meat alternatives. The new hydration section promotes and complicit. This has hampered the effective control consumption of water, milk, sugar-free drinks, and tea of sales of obesogenic foods and the encouragement of and coffee. The plate also includes a section on traffic- overconsumption by the food and marketing industries. light labels. New considerations of sustainable diets were informed by analyses undertaken by the Carbon Trust The Responsibility Deal was intended to bring the which looked at greenhouse gas, water and land use. The industry into discussions and to facilitate protection of guidelines also promote consumption of sustainable fish. the public from unhealthy foods and drinks. However, most observers think that it has failed to achieve this “5 A Day” is a long standing programme promoting the objective and that instead regulation, taxation and consumption of five portions of fruit and vegetables a day legislation are required to tackle complex issues such as as an important element of a healthy diet. New guidelines obesity. Even industry now acknowledges this apparent have been produced (Public Health England, 2016b), and 10 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
failure and, to some degree, asks for regulatory action, as Despite paper commitments to preventing ill-health in they crave a level playing field in which the pledges they major national health strategies from NHS England and make become requirements for all businesses, not just Public Health England, the reality on the ground is one those signed up to the Responsibility Deal. of cuts to local authority funding in general and to public health budgets in particular, which also threatens the The recent implementation of the sugar-sweetened response to the obesity challenge. There is also a failure to beverage levy (“the sugar tax”) is the first evidence of recognize alcohol in policies to tackle obesity. Ironically, real government resolve to tackle childhood obesity. The the four chief medical officers of the UK have included government’s position has been strengthened by the the obesogenic power of alcohol in their safe drinking apparent failure of the Responsibility Deal, although the guidelines, but the Eatwell Guide does not acknowledge focus of the national childhood obesity strategy is again the risks of alcohol with regard to obesity (Public Health on voluntary action by industry. England, 2016a).
The resurgent interest in reducing obesogenic environ In England, an effective obesity strategy has been ments is a welcome asset in English public health. Policies long-awaited, first for children and then for adults. An on public transport and the built environment policies action plan on childhood obesity published in August in England have been going the wrong way for many 2016 largely shied away from regulatory measures on years when viewed in the wider European context and industry, including marketing (Boseley, 2016). There there is much to be done to redress years of policy neglect. was widespread condemnation of this from public health NHS England’s initiative on Healthy Towns will offer authorities and two years on, there is expectation that a the possibility to build new healthy environments from Children’s Obesity Strategy Mark 2 will be published very scratch, but it is confined to new developments, usually soon, which will take on concerns about the pervasive at the outskirts of towns and cities. The robust nature of effects of food marketing to children. Whatever happens, NGOs lobbying on obesity policy nationally is another undoubtedly more and stronger action will be needed, asset of the public health policy landscape in England. if the dire consequences of the obesity pandemic are to be avoided.
References Academy of the Medical Royal Colleges (2014). Measuring up: Devlin K (2009). Multi-million pound Change4Life obesity the medical professions prescription for the nation’s obesity crisis. campaign too “simplistic”. Daily Telegraph, 9 January 2009. London: Academy of the Medical Royal Colleges. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/wellbeing/diet/4177130/ (http://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ Multi-million-pound-Change4Life-obesity-campaign-too- Measuring_Up_0213.pdf, accessed 28 June 2018). simplistic.html, accessed 14 June 2018).
Blackshaw JR (2016). Public health nutrition in the civil Department of Health (1991). The health of the nation: a service (England): approaches to tackling obesity. In: consultative document for England. London: HMSO. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. The Nutrition Society Summer Meeting, University of Nottingham, 6–9 July 2015. Department of Health (2008). Healthy Weight, Healthy (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings- Lives: A Cross-Government Strategy for England. of-the-nutrition-society/article/public-health-nutrition-in- London: Department of Health. (http://webarchive. the-civil-service-england-approaches-to-tackling-obesity/ nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100407220245/http:/www. B94CF7EDA2BA148CDD28D904E1E2E7BE) dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_082378, accessed 14 June Boseley S (2016). Childhood obesity: UK’s “inexcusable” 2018). strategy is wasted opportunity, say experts. The Guardian, 18 August. (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/aug/18/ Department of Health (2011). Start Active, Stay Active: A childhood-obesity-strategy-wasted-opportunity-campaigners, report on physical activity from the four home countries’ Chief accessed 14 June 2018). Medical Officers. London: Department of Health.
Change for Life (2018). Change for Life [website]. London: Department of Health (2016). UK Chief Medical Officers’ NHS England. (http://www.nhs.uk/change4life, accessed 14 alcohol guidelines review. Summary of proposed new June 2018). guidelines. London: The Stationery Office. https://www.gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ Cross-Government Obesity Unit (2009). Healthy weight, file/489795/summary.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). healthy lives, one year on. London: Cross-Government Obesity Unit. Department of Health and Social Care (2011a). The nutrient profiling model. London: Department of Health and Social Care. England 11
Department of Health and Social Care (2011b). UK physical NAO (2001). Tackling obesity in England. London: National activity guidelines. London: Department of Health and Social Audit Office. (https://www.nao.org.uk/report/tackling-obesity- Care. in-england/, accessed 14 June 2018).
Egger G, Swinburn B (1997). An “ecological” approach to the NAO (2008). Tackling child obesity – first steps. London: obesity pandemic. BMJ. 315(7106):477–80. National Audit Office. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/tackling- child-obesity-first-steps/, accessed 14 June 2018). Faculty of Public Health, Natural England (2010). Great outdoors. London: Faculty of Public Health. (http://webarchive. NAO (2012). An update on the government’s approach nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100408082121/http://www.dh.gov. to tackling obesity. London: National Audit Office. uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/ https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/tackling_ digitalasset/dh_084024.pdf, accessed 28 June 2018). obesity_update.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018).
Foresight (2007). Tackling obesities: future choices project National Obesity Forum (2016). About the NOF. London: report. London: The Stationery Office. National Obesity Forum. (http://www.nationalobesityforum. org.uk/index.php/about-the-nof.html, accessed 14 June 2018). House of Commons Health Committee (2015). Childhood obesity – brave and bold action. First Report of Session 2015–16. National Obesity Observatory (2016). Patterns and trends in London: House of Commons Health Committee. child obesity: A presentation of the latest data on child obesity. Updated March 2016 (http://www.noo.org.uk/NOO_pub/ HM Government (1999). Saving lives; our healthier nation. Key_data, accessed 14 September 2016). London: HMSO. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/265576/4386.pdf, accessed NHS choices (2014a). Obesity. London: NHS England. 14 June 2018). (http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Obesity/Pages/Introduction.aspx, accessed 14 June 2018). HM Government (2004). Choosing health: making healthy choices easier. London: The Stationery Office. NHS Choices (2014b). Start the NHS weight loss plan. London: (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/ NHS England. (http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/weight-loss-guide/ http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_ Pages/losing-weight-getting-started.aspx, accessed 14 June 2018). digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_133489. pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). NHS Commissioning Board (2013). Clinical commissioning policy: complex and specialized obesity surgery. London: HM Government (2018) Childhood obesity: a plan for action. NHS England. (https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/ Chapter 2. London: HM Government (https://assets.publishing. uploads/2013/04/a05-p-a.pdf, accessed 21 March 2016). service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_ data/file/718903/childhood-obesity-a-plan-for-action-chapter-2. NHS England (2016). Healthy New Towns. London: NHS pdf, accessed 5 November 2018). England. (https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/innovation/ healthy-new-towns/, accessed 14 June 2018). Jolly K, Beach J, Adab P, Daley A (2011). Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes NHS England (2014). Report of the working group into: joined with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: up clinical pathways for obesity. London: NHS England. Lighten Up randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 343:d6500. (https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ owg-join-clinc-path.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). Landscape Institute (2013). Public Health and Landscape: Creating Healthy Places. Position Statement. London: NHS England (2014b). Five Year Forward View. London: NHS Landscape Institute. England.
Leeds Beckett University (2015). Whole Systems Approach to NICE (2013). Weight management: lifestyle services for Tackle Obesity. Leeds: Leeds Beckett University. (https://www. overweight or obese children and young people. London: leedsbeckett.ac.uk/wholesystemsobesity/, accessed 14 June 2018). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph47/chapter/1- Local Government Association (2015) LGA Public Health Recommendations, accessed 14 June 2018). Opinion Survey: National Results. London: Local Government Association. NICE (2014a). Obesity: identification, assessment and management. CG 189. London: National Institute for Health Lustig R (2014). Fat chance: The hidden truth about sugar, and Clinical Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ obesity and disease. New York, Harper Collins. cg189/chapter/1-recommendations, accessed 14 June 2018).
Middleton J, Saunders P (2015). 20 years of local ecological NICE (2014b). Weight management: lifestyle services for public health: the experience of Sandwell in the English West overweight or obese adults. London: National Institute for Midlands. Public Health.129:1344–1352. Health and Clinical Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/ guidance/ph53/chapter/1-recommendations, accessed 14 June Mindell JS, Watkins SJ, Cohen JM eds. (2011). Health on the 2018). Move 2. Policies for health-promoting transport. Stockport: Transport & Health Study Group. NICE (2015a). Preventing excess weight gain. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (https://www.nice. org.uk/guidance/NG7/chapter/1-recommendations, accessed 14 June 2018). 12 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
NICE (2015b). Preventing excess weight gain: Related guidance. Royal College of Physicians (2015b). The new alliance on London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. obesity outlines priorities for action. London: Royal College of (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng7/chapter/5-Related- Physicians. (https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/news/new-alliance- NICE-guidance, accessed 14 June 2018). obesity-outlines-priorities-action, accessed 14 June 2018).
Petticrew M, Eastmure E, Mays N, Knai C, Durand MA, Nolte SACN (2015). Carbohydrates and health. Norwich: The E (2013). The Public Health Responsibility Deal: how should Stationery Office. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ such a complex public health policy be evaluated? J Pub Health. system/uploads/attachment_data/file/445503/SACN_ 35(4):495–501. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt064. Carbohydrates_and_Health.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018).
Public Health England (2013). PHE Advisory Board Paper. Saunders P, Saunders A, Middleton J (2015). Living in a “fat Early Programme Plans for Obesity. London: Public Health swamp”: exposure to multiple sources of accessible, cheap, England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ energy-dense fast foods in a deprived community. Brit J uploads/attachment_data/file/223979/PHE13-01_Obesity.pdf, Nutr.113:1828–1834. accessed 14 June 2018). Sport England (2012). Sport England Strategy 2012–17. Public Health England (2014). PHE and Association of London: Sport England. (http://www.sportengland.org/ Directors of Public Health survey findings: tackling obesity. media/3662/a-sporting-habit-for-life-a4-1.pdf, accessed 14 June London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/ 2018). government/publications/phe-and-association-of-directors-of- public-health-survey-findings-tackling-obesity, accessed 14 June Sport England (2014). Get healthy get active. What we’ve 2018). learnt so far, April 2013–July 2014. London: Sport England. (http://www.sportengland.org/media/3067/final-get-healthy-get- Public Health England (2014). Everybody active, everyday: an active-what-we-ve-learnt.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). evidence-based approach to physical activity. London: Public Health England. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ Taubes G (2013). The science of obesity: what do we really system/uploads/attachment_data/file/374914/Framework_13. know about what makes us fat? An essay by Gary Taubes. pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). BMJ.346:f1050.
Public Health England (2014b). Evidence into action: Tedstone A, Targett V (2015). Public Health England’s report on opportunities to protect and improve the nation’s health. sugar reduction. BMJ.351:h6095. London: Public Health England. Tedstone A, Targett V, Allen R; PHE (2015). Sugar reduction: Public Health England (2015). Sugar reduction: The evidence the evidence for action. London: Public Health England. for action. London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ uk/government/publications/sugar-reduction-from-evidence- attachment_data/file/470179/Sugar_reduction_The_evidence_ into-action, accessed 28 June 2018). for_action.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018).
Public Health England (2016a). Revised Eatwell plate. London: Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J (2013). Dietary sugars Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/ and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508636/FINAL_ randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ.346:e7492. Eatwell_guide_15_MARCH_2016.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492.
Public Health England (2016b). 5 a day logo usage guidance. UKACTIVE (2014). Turning the tide of inactivity. London: London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/ UKACTIVE. government/publications/government-5-a-day-logo, accessed 14 June 2018). UK Parliament (2015a). Impact of physical activity and diet on health. London: The Stationery Office. Public Health England (2016c). 5 a day logo licensing. London: (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/ Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/ cmhealth/845/845.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508442/5_A_ Day_revised_licensing_guidelines_V10.pdf, accessed 14 June UK Parliament (2015b). Childhood obesity— brave 2018). and bold action. London: The Stationery Office. (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/ Puhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke J (2013). Fighting obesity or cmhealth/465/465.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). obese persons? Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages. Int J Obes.37:774–782. Wanless (2002). Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View. London: HM Treasury. (http://webarchive. Ross A, Chang M (2013). Planning Healthier Places: Report nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ from the Reuniting Health with Planning Project. London: consult_wanless_final.htm, accessed 14 June 2018). Town and Country Planning Association. (http://www.tcpa. org.uk/data/files/Health_and_planning/Health_Phase_2/ WHO (2016). Report of the Commission on ending childhood Planning_Healthier_Places.pdf, accessed 18 March 2016). obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization. (http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng. Royal College of Physicians (2015a). Obesity health alliance. pdf?ua=1, accessed 14 June 2018). Joint statement on priorities. London: Royal College of Physicians. (https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/news/new-alliance- Yudkin J (1972). Sugar and disease. Nature.239(5369):197–199. obesity-outlines-priorities-action, accessed 14 June 2018). England 13
Alcohol
John Middleton
The scale of the challenge
In England, alcohol is the leading risk factor for 1979; 2013). One of the main lobby organizations for preventable death in 15–49-year-olds. Nine million adults alcohol control is the UK Alcohol Health Alliance, a (of an overall population of 53 million people, including robust coalition of nongovernment service providers children) are estimated to drink at levels that increase and pressure groups concerned with alcohol problems the risk of harm, and 1.6 million of those show signs of and health policy organizations for whom alcohol alcohol dependency. From 2001 to 2012, the number of is an important issue in their work (Alcohol Health people who died due to liver disease in England rose from Alliance, 2013). 7 841 to 10 948 (Public Health England, 2014). However, there has been a notable absence of reference Overall, alcohol harm is estimated to cost England to alcohol problems in national health improvement, 21 billion pounds sterling a year, with the costs to the health promotion and public health policy statements. National Health Service (NHS) amounting to 3.5 billion For example, the 1992 Health of the Nation strategy pounds sterling. There are massive inequalities in where (Department of Health, 1998) identified five major its impact is felt. People with mental illness are more national priorities: coronary heart disease reduction, likely to misuse alcohol, and the most deprived fifth of cancer prevention, accident prevention, suicide the population suffers a two to three times greater loss prevention and HIV/AIDS and sexual health. Any of life attributable to alcohol. In 2012/2013, there were of these might reasonably have identified alcohol as a 326 000 hospital admissions where alcohol was the main risk factor but none did. The successor strategy of the reason for admission (Public Health England, 2014). Labour government in 1999, “Saving lives: our healthier nation” proposed a three-way contract of public health Alcohol is one of the seven priority areas for action for improvement between government, local agencies and Public Health England (Public Health England, 2014). individuals (Department of Health, 1999). It identified Alcohol also features in the NHS England Five Year safer alcohol consumption as solely the responsibility Forward View chapter on prevention of ill-health (NHS, of individuals. The NHS plan of 2000 was hastily 2014). There is considerable agreement across national conceived when the Labour government, which had been health policy-makers about the significance of alcohol in power since 1997, considered itself freed of the shackles as a health problem that needs to be addressed. Most of previous government commitments and invested recently, the chief medical officers of the four nations substantially in the NHS. It included a commitment to of the United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland and producing a national alcohol strategy by 2004. At the Northern Ireland) have published new alcohol guidelines time commentators considered that a long way off. A for public consultation (Department of Health, 2016). review of alcohol licensing in 2003 led to a liberalization However, there is less agreement among policy-makers on of public drinking hours and increased availability the actions required, implementation of policies is uneven and accessibility of alcohol. The 2005 Licensing Act and there is considerable and very effective opposition, enabled, in effect, a 24-hour drinking culture to be obstruction and policy obfuscation from vested interests established in the UK. Aspirations for this Act to create for the alcohol, hospitality and advertising industries. a “European café culture” and the implied sensible use of alcohol, however, were not delivered. The new licensing arrangements consolidated the image of inner city centres Policies and programmes as no-go areas for all but hardened drinkers and enhanced problems for both police and regulatory authorities. In There has been a long history of professionally led calls effect, the government had raised the degree of difficulty for action on alcohol in England and in the UK more faced by public health and criminal justice services in generally. The most celebrated among these calls has dealing with alcohol harm. been the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ publication “Our Favourite Drug” (Royal College of Psychiatrists. 14 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
In 2004, the long-awaited national Alcohol Harm Together, the alcohol harm reduction strategy and Reduction Strategy for England was published. It sought “Choosing health” constituted England’s first alcohol to tackle alcohol-related disorders in towns and city strategy. However, it was unfunded and lacked a strong centres; improve treatment and support for people with focus on performance management at a time when alcohol-related problems; clamp down on irresponsible the National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse drinks promotions by the industry and provide better yielded considerable public funds for drug misuse and information to consumers about the potential dangers a strong performance management function from the of alcohol misuse. The report was published in the name centre, through regions to ensure service performance of the Prime Minister’s strategy unit and carried the and outcomes. The MoCAM framework was drawn Prime Minister’s personal stamp of approval. It called from a framework devised in 2002 for drug misusers. It for a social responsibility commitment from industry proposed four tiers of alcohol prevention and treatment (Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, 2004). Later in 2004 services, from tier 1, generic service provision, such the government published its White Paper on public as housing and social care where alcohol problems health, “Choosing health: making healthy choices might be prevented or identified early, through tier 2, easier” (Department of Health, 2004). This White Paper generalist alcohol advice services to people before they followed an overall framework of supporting individuals have alcohol problems, tier 3, specialized community to make healthier choices, but it lacked earlier public providers for people with recognized alcohol problems health policy references to the roles of wider health and tier 4, highly specialized clinical inpatient services determinants and the responsibilities of the state, industry and residential alcohol rehabilitation programmes. The and commerce. In relation to alcohol it proposed (Public notion of tiers of services still has some currency for Health England Alcohol Learning Centre Archive, 2016): commissioning services, but is not mandatory and is limited from the viewpoint of effective public health • investing in early intervention measures through intervention. The continued focus on individuals with the NHS; problems distracts attention from the societal problem and the vested interests still profiting from damaging • providing guidance and training to ensure all health public health. Crucially, it also distracts attention from professionals are able to identify alcohol-related the most powerful, “upstream” interventions that can problems at an early stage; be summarized as the “3As”: affordability, acceptability • piloting approaches to targeted screening and brief and availability. intervention in both primary care and hospital settings; The strategy was updated in 2007 with an emphasis on youth drinking. Again, the emphasis was on individual • launching initiatives in partnership with the responsibility, damage limitation by policing and Criminal Justice System to reduce re-offending, licensing authorities, and a voluntary code of practice by ensuring that alcohol treatment needs are met from industry and retail (HM Government, 2007). alongside drug treatment needs; Additional central government technical resources • developing a programme to improve alcohol were forthcoming, including “Signs for improvement – treatment services, based on the Models of Care for commissioning interventions to reduce alcohol-related Alcohol Misusers (MoCAM). harm” (Department of Health, 2009) and high-impact interventions for reducing hospital-related alcohol Brief interventions for alcohol problems proved an admissions (Department of Health, 2008). The Public important element of the strategy (Public Health Services Agreements (PSA) initiative from 2007 gave England Alcohol Learning Centre Archive, 2016). These local authorities the chance to propose local targets, developed into the Identification and Brief Intervention which, if achieved, led to the payment of bonuses from (IBA) and are likely to remain a key element of local central government. and national strategy implementation. The Audit –C brief intervention audit tool is an important supporting In addition, the National Audit Office (NAO) report on resource for IBA and for extended brief intervention alcohol (NAO, 2008) and the Chief Medical Officers (Public Health England Alcohol Learning Resources, (CMO) annual report in 2008 (Department of Health, 2016; Alcohol Academy, 2015). 2009) both raised the profile of alcohol as a problem for England’s health and health services. England 15
The World Class Commissioning (WCC) initiative in Yet, when the follow-up document “Next Steps” was 2008 encouraged local primary care trusts to develop published in 2013, it was clear that a minimum unit ambitions and priorities for preventing ill-health price had been thrown off the agenda – the then Home and commissioning services setting their own local Secretary, Theresa May, had won out in her opposition expectations for improving outcomes, as well as staying to this policy measure. All efforts to reduce alcohol- within their budgets. It was the first NHS initiative to related crime were to rely on local night-time economy propose targets based on health outcomes and to seek partnerships and on voluntary agreements with industry reductions in inequalities in health (Department of to stop selling high strength alcohols and multiple sales. Health, 2008). Alcohol was the second most frequent “A minimum unit price” was redefined to mean not selling priority for English primary care trusts in the WCC alcohol below the price the retailer had bought it for programme (Whittington, 2009). WCC only survived (Home Office, 2013). two years, up to the 2010 election, and was then dropped as being too bureaucratic, expensive to administer and All national health policy efforts with regard to burdensome in the eyes of the new coalition government alcohol were then wrapped up in voluntary agreement of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. with industry in the form of the Responsibility Deal (Department of Health, 2011). Introduced in 2011 after Under the coalition government any central pressure to publication of the public health White Paper and with extend alcohol services dissipated. Organizational change reforms moving towards the Health and Social Care created further uncertainty with regard to investment Act of 2012, the Responsibility Deal was intended to in alcohol programmes which were to transfer to local be a partnership between government, industry and authority-based public health departments from 2013. public health organizations to agree interventions by For many involved in the energy-sapping and hugely industry which would demonstrate their corporate distracting organizational upheaval, it became difficult social responsibility and promote health. There was an to plan and develop new services, or advocate for national overarching Responsibility Deal forum chaired by a policy changes, such as minimum unit pricing. A new senior civil servant and more specific Responsibility Deal government alcohol strategy came out in 2012. It was forums dealing with alcohol, food, physical activity and led by the Home Office and was pre-occupied with health in the workplace. Researchers from the London reducing alcohol-related violence in public places. The School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) were then Prime Minister, David Cameron, was in favour of commissioned to evaluate the initiative. They described minimum unit pricing for alcohol. In the introduction to at the outset how the disparate and wide-ranging the strategy he wrote: pledges suggested by industry presented a complex set of interventions for which it would be all but impossible to We are going to introduce a new minimum unit assess effectiveness (Petticrew, 2013; Knai et al., 2015a). price. For the first time it will be illegal for shops to They also reviewed the characteristics of 47 voluntary sell alcohol for less than this set price per unit. We agreements with industry at the outset of the project are consulting on the actual price, but if it is 40p and considered that effective voluntary agreements are that could mean 50 000 fewer crimes each year and based on clearly defined, evidence-based and quantifiable 900 fewer alcohol-related deaths a year by the end of targets, which require partners to go beyond “business as the decade. usual” and include penalties for not delivering the pledges (Bryden et al., 2013). This isn’t about stopping responsible drinking, adding burdens on business or some new kind of Many public health advocacy organizations did not stealth tax – it’s about fast, immediate action where take part in the Responsibility Deal, and more left the universal change is needed. initiative in 2013 when it became clear that government commitments to legislate on plain packaging for And let’s be clear. This will not hurt pubs. A pint cigarettes and on minimum unit price for alcohol is around two units. If the minimum price is were sidelined and that these and other meaningful 40p a unit, it won’t affect the price of a pint in interventions by government were facing behind-the- a pub. In fact, pubs may benefit by making the scenes lobbying by industry. By 2016, the alcohol core cheap alternatives in supermarkets more expensive group membership was dominated by industry partners, (HM Government, 2012). with the exceptions of Addaction (a drug and alcohol 16 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
treatment charity), Mentor UK (an NGO aiming to the alcohol and hospitality industry interests excluded. prevent drug and alcohol misuse among children and The committee has taken into account new evidence young people) and the Association of Chief Police on overall population risks of excessive consumption, Officers (Department of Health, 2016b). One specific including research debunking the presumed health expectation of the Responsibility Deal was that benefits of alcohol (Chikritzhs, 2009). The draft interventions could be delivered within the lifetime of guidance acknowledges for the first time in a UK a single parliament. That did not happen, and industry health policy statement the classification of alcohol as successfully delayed effective interventions such as a class 1 carcinogenic substance by the World Health legislation, taxation and regulation. On the alcohol Organization (WHO). It is the first time a European Responsibility Deal specifically, an evidence synthesis country has judged the health risks of alcohol to be showed that the alcohol pledges were unlikely to deliver the same for men and women. The implications of the the intended benefits to public health (Knai et al., changed guidance may be considerable. Its statement, for 2015a). The most effective evidence-based interventions instance, that there is no safe level of alcohol consumption to reduce alcohol-related harm, such as interventions to might accelerate the drive for a minimum unit price and make alcohol less available and more expensive, were make more imperative the need to reinstate a retail price specifically excluded from the Responsibility Deal terms escalator for alcohol. It will also make it necessary to of reference (Knai et al., 2015b). pursue higher real prices of alcohol through taxation and a higher taxation of higher strength alcoholic drinks. The Katherine Brown of the Institute of Alcohol Studies guidance has also sparked calls for a different labelling summarized the position of the Responsibility Deal and regulation of alcohol because of its carcinogenic forum dealing with alcohol as follows: status (Brown, 2016).
The Responsibility Deal is not endorsed by academics or the public health community. It has pursued initiatives Problem identification and issue known to have limited efficacy in reducing alcohol- recognition related harm. The evidence on the effectiveness of the The United Kingdom Secretary of State for Health sets Responsibility Deal is limited and unreliable, due to alcohol health policy for England through the United ambiguous goals and poor reporting practices. Where Kingdom Department of Health (DH) and Public evaluation has been possible, implementation has Health England (PHE). The Home Office is responsible often failed to live up to the letter and/or the spirit of for licensing and aspects of alcohol control through the pledges. The Responsibility Deal appears to have policing and prevention of disorder. The Ministry of obstructed more meaningful initiatives with a stronger Justice is responsible for criminal justice responses to evidence base behind them (Institute of Alcohol alcohol-related crimes and violence. Studies, 2015). PHE develops and assembles evidence, prepares policy The first UK safe drinking guidelines were published in advice and oversees surveillance data for England on 1995 (Hunt, 1995). Unofficial sources close to the then all aspects of alcohol health and safety concerns. PHE Chief Medical Officer suggest that he was excluded from has also funded and piloted services, including an the revisions made by senior administrative officials in alcohol capital developments programme and alcohol the Department of Health in “partnership” with industry action areas, for which an evaluation is awaited. PHE representatives. The CMO was left to justify publicly has commissioned return on investment studies and a how the guidance had come to be changed and issued so capacity model for each local authority on the care of close to Christmas. dependent drinkers. It is unclear why that guidance was then left unscrutin Local authorities are the lead body responsible for ized or reviewed for over 20 years, but new guidance forming the statutory Health and Wellbeing Boards was issued for public consultation in January 2016 which comprise local authority cabinet members for (Department of Health, 2016). In these new guidelines, public health, children and adult social services, GP supported by the four CMOs of the four UK countries, members of the local Clinical Commissioning Group, the evidence base and recommendations have been the local HealthWatch patient and public involvement compiled through an expert health committee, with organization and other health-related interests agreed by England 17
the local partners. Alcohol is likely to be a high priority other activities, through which people are encouraged to for these boards; but this is locally determined. go the whole of January without alcohol as an extension of New Year resolutions to reduce their drinking. The Local authorities are the lead local statutory agencies campaign is gathering popularity but remains a source responsible for setting up and running the local of professional debate and controversy, although the community safety or Crime Reduction Partnership assertions on both sides are evidence-light (Hamilton (CRP). This is a partnership between the police, health and Gilmore, 2016). Other charities are also active in and other community agencies. Alcohol-related violence alcohol policy, including the British Liver Trust, Cancer in domestic and public settings is often a major priority Research UK and Breakthrough Breast Cancer. Other for CRPs. Local authorities also lead the multiagency nongovernment initiatives on alcohol include Alcohol Children and Adult Safeguarding Committees and Research UK (http://alcoholresearchuk.org), the Institute alcohol is a major concern in all safeguarding work. of Alcohol Studies (http://www.ias.org.uk), the Alcohol Policy Network (http://www.alcoholpolicy.net), and the Local authority public health departments are responsible Alcohol Academy (http://www.alcoholacademy.net). for assessing the level of need with regard to alcohol problems and for advocating effective interventions at Public health departments at UK universities have been the local level. Local authority public health departments prominent in shaping understanding of alcohol problems hold the budget for local alcohol policies and are charged and in proposing policy interventions. with delivering public health programmes for prevention of and early intervention in alcohol problems. The level The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence of funding for programmes is locally determined as is (NICE) is a national body charged with assessing the the decision which interventions are chosen, on what evidence for the effectiveness of clinical, public health evidence, relative to other competing local needs. and social care interventions. It has published extensive reports on the effectiveness, cost–effectiveness and Local authorities are the lead agency for licensing alcohol return on investment for alcohol-use disorders, covering sales from pubs and other places of public entertain diagnosis, assessment and management of harmful ment and for off-sales for home consumption. Local drinking and alcohol dependence (NICE, 2011; NICE authorities have powers to limit public drinking. Local 2011b; NICE, 2014). authority environmental health and trading standards departments oversee aspects of consumer protection and The alcohol and hospitality industry also has an are generally the departments responsible for the licensing influential role in policy formulation. The Portman of alcohol outlets. Group (TPG) (http://www.portmangroup.org.uk) is an organization financed and founded by the alcohol Public Health England and NHS England both see industry that claims to promote social responsibility alcohol as a major priority. The Associations of Chief within the industry, primarily focusing on responsible Police Officers and Chief Probation Officers and other marketing, labelling and speaking for its members. bodies involved in alcohol-related crime and violence The Portman Group purports to “show leadership on also recognize it as a major concern. There is also a best practice in the area of alcohol responsibility” and robust NGO lobby for protecting people from the harms to “foster a balanced understanding of alcohol-related of alcohol. The Alcohol Health Alliance, mentioned issues”. However, many alcohol experts regard Portman in the Policies and programmes section, (http://ahauk. as an attempt by the alcohol industry to portray alcohol org) is an umbrella organization for over 40 public as distinct from other kinds of drugs and to give it a health, community and voluntary organizations; it is respectable public face (Room, 2004; McCambridge, campaigning on all aspects of alcohol-related harm. In 2013; Powerbae, 2012). There is little doubt that the its “Health First” document (Alcohol Health Alliance, group has been beneficial to the alcohol industry. It also 2013) it advocates for strong evidence-based interventions, offers a front to enable high level access by industry to principally through national legislation, taxation government officials. Reflecting on the role played by the and regulation. Portman Group in the development of the English public health White Paper “Choosing health: making healthy Alcohol Concern is a charity aiming to reduce alcohol choices easier” (2004), an alcohol industry executive told harm. It leads the national Dry January campaign, among The Grocer magazine: 18 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
The Portman Group was set up as our insurance policy. in terms of absenteeism from the workplace, crime Getting all the different competitors to work together and violence. has not been plain sailing but the creation of the group has definitely benefited us all. There was nothing in the The Fingertips information system managed by PHE is a White Paper that was a surprise. We are already ahead of major intelligence resource for public health departments the game in most areas (Powerbase, 2012). in local authorities and local government licensing and other departments. In some cases, local Directors Drinkaware (https://www.drinkaware.co.uk) is an of Public Health have used the data provided by PHE allegedly independent trust which split from the to inform their annual reports and recommendations Portman Group in 2004. It undertakes all the alcohol regarding the pervasive negative effects of alcohol education work previously undertaken by the Portman (Wood, 2014). Group. Drinkaware promotes an extensive body of so-called sensible drinking advice and projects that it In December 2016, PHE published an evidence review delivers across the country. It is industry-funded and, on alcohol harm and its impact on England, as well as although a separation is made from industry concerns, the effectiveness and cost–effectiveness of alcohol control profound doubts remain about the true independence of policies (Public Health England, 2016c). The review the advice and information it provides (McCambridge, concluded that policies that reduce the affordability of 2013). If nothing else, it enables the industry to present alcohol through taxation and price regulation policies a respectable face and the impression of responsible are the most effective, and cost-effective, approaches to marketing. Most notably, Drinkaware has not advocated prevention and health improvement. The document also any industry regulation or a minimum unit price found evidence in favour of regulating marketing and for alcohol. availability, while providing information, education and labels on alcoholic beverages was not found to be effective or cost-effective (Public Health England, 2016c). Policy formulation
PHE is in charge of alcohol policy development at the Policy implementation national level, but NHS England may begin to play a greater role in the future, given the expectations on Local government is charged with implementation, preventing ill-health in their Five Year Forward View through the provisions of the 2012 Health and Social (2014). All the agencies described in previous sections as Care Act. They face an uphill task given the lack of having roles in the identification of alcohol harms have support from effective national polices. Local government similar roles in formulating national, regional and local seeks to address alcohol-related harms, crime and disorder policies. The Policies and programmes section described through its management of public health services, the 25-year history of ineffective alcohol policies in environmental licensing and consumer protection and England (and the UK as a whole). social care and through its partnerships with the police, health and community organizations.
Decision-making Public health agencies are vital, but their ability to act and be accepted in local partnerships is variable, according to The Department of Health and PHE are the main public how their host councils view their importance and how bodies in charge of decision-making for health-related much they prioritize alcohol problems. alcohol policy. So far, however, the Treasury has not moved to implement the minimum unit price on alcohol At local level local authorities are free to implement local that was recommended by the Chief Medical Officer, the policies in licensing and alcohol control, in providing NHS chief executive and PHE and it has removed the community safety related services, trading standards retail price escalator that would have increased alcohol- and consumer protection services. Since 2013, their related revenue each year at the time of the budget. No responsibility for public health has meant that they other government department has argued for the need also provide or commission client services for problem for alcohol control policies – even though many could drinkers and preventive campaigns and services. reasonably recognize and acknowledge that their sector also experiences the adverse effects of alcohol harm – England 19
Information on how well local policies have been Bar None”, seeking to support local licensees to promote implemented is patchy, but some local authorities have safer drinking. This includes responsible beverage server exercised their legal powers in relation to licensing and training, substitution of plastic glasses, increased CCTV introduced restrictions on off-sales of high strength and other surveillance and support for security and taxi lagers and ciders (BBC News, 2013; McGill, 2015). marshals to ensure safe passage home from a night out Some councils have also introduced late-night levies into (County Durham Council, 2013). their business rates to cover the costs of late-night waste disposal and licensing and disorder issues (Islington LBC, One of the challenges to public health action on alcohol 2014). Cheltenham’s late-night levy scheme was reported at the local level are the major reductions in funding for to have failed to raise the expected level of income from public health. In 2015–16, a one–off cut of 200 million licensees and a number of licenses were surrendered; pounds sterling took place, equivalent to a 6% cut across the scheme did not have the desired outcomes and has local authorities. Following the comprehensive spending already been replaced by a Business Improvement District review in the autumn of 2015, the public health grant to in which all businesses will be asked to contribute to an local authorities was then cut yet further; amounting to improved night-time economy (The Publican’s Morning a cumulative reduction of approximately 10% by 2020. Advertiser, 2015; 2016). Local authorities and NHS Clinical Commissioning Community safety partnerships (formerly crime and Groups are able to collaborate through the Health and disorder reduction partnerships) are the statutory Wellbeing Boards, and through the expectation of a needs partnerships based on local government boundaries, assessment and recommendations for the annual report between local authorities, police, health and other of the Director of Public Health and the joint strategic criminal justice and community agencies (Williams, needs assessment. Different Health and Wellbeing Boards 2011). For most of these partnerships, alcohol-related may have different memberships based on different violent crime will be a priority. local services; they may also consider different partners relevant for their decisions, which means that the food Since the 2011 Police Reform Act, an additional industry and agricultural interests may be relevant in partnership has been formed which is not statutory. It is some local authorities. Some Health and Wellbeing based on police authority areas and involves the police, Boards do include representation from district councils – criminal justice and offender management and the Police the so-called second tier councils within large county and Crime Commissioners. For most of these, alcohol authorities. The district council portfolio includes town has not been identified as a priority. Yet, issues such as planning, housing, environmental health and trading victim support and offender management feature in the standards and they therefore often have a strong interest plans of most (HMIC, 2015). in alcohol-related issues.
An increasing number of local authorities, with their Health and Wellbeing Boards have the potential to crime and disorder reduction partnerships, are imple deliver joint programmes on alcohol harm reduction, menting the “Cardiff model” (Public Health England through policies and directly managed or commissioned Alcohol Learning Centre, 2016; Florence, 2011). These services. Some regional partnerships were created partnerships share local alcohol harm related data, before introduction of the Health and Social Care Act such as last drink surveys in accident and emergency (2012) which introduced the Health and Wellbeing departments, as well as closed-circuit television (CCTV) Boards, to support alcohol control programmes across evidence of disturbances, building a wider picture of local authority boundaries. The most successful of where policing needs to take place and where licensing these, “Balance”, in the North-East of England, is now authorities need to exercise judgements on renewing facing funding reductions. A similar programme, called licensing applications. There is widespread recognition of Drinkwise North-West, has now closed. The South-West the need for multiagency responses to alcohol problems Office for Tobacco Control has now taken on alcohol from crime reduction partnerships – examples include control for the south-west. Cardiff, Oxford, Cambridge, Bristol (Public Health England Alcohol Learning Centre, 2016) and Brighton (Hardcastle, 2009). Partnership initiatives include “Night Safe initiatives”, with one approach called “Best 20 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
Monitoring and evaluation investment in the workforce for alcohol services, the training of staff, and in overall alcohol education. Public health services in England are involved in monitoring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related There is a history of policy contradictions. The national health problems. PHE is responsible for the overall strategy statements of successive governments state the monitoring of alcohol-related health problems and health importance of alcohol problems and the need for action, service utilization and for collating data on community but some of the actions they have taken have gone in safety, collected by the police. Data compiled in relation the wrong direction. The liberalization of alcohol sales to children and adult safeguarding come from children has increased the problem; from the time of the Single and adult safeguarding units, generally staffed by the Market Act in 1992, when the price of alcohol in the UK multiple agencies involved in safeguarding. Public health equalized rapidly with the European prices and alcohol is expected to exercise a central role in community harm rose in proportion to the reduction in alcohol safety, safeguarding and health and social care service price and increased availability. The Licensing Act in commissioning and prevention. How this plays out 2005 increased availability and accessibility, resulting in practice across 152 local authorities, however, is in a perfect triangle for increasing alcohol consumption. extremely variable. Government relationships with industry have been close and complicit, and prevented effective control of excessive The Local Alcohol Profiles England (LAPE) set up by the alcohol sales and consumption. Liverpool John Moores University, initially on behalf of the Department of Health and subsequently for PHE, are The Responsibility Deal which was intended to bring now assimilated into the PHE dataset for local authorities the industry into discussions and facilitate enhanced known as Fingertips (Public Health England, 2016). It safe drinking and protection of the public has failed is an excellent tool for local needs assessment and for to reduce alcohol harms. The negative outcome of the comparison with neighbouring authorities, comparable Responsibility Deal suggests that voluntary agreements authorities (“the family”) and with the country as a whole. with industry do not work and that instead regulation, taxation and legislation are required (Bryden et al., 2013). The National Audit Office has not picked up on alcohol This has even been acknowledged by some industry as a national priority since its report in 2008 (NAO, representatives who wish for a level playing field in which 2008). The Parliamentary Health Select Committee the pledge they made becomes a requirement for all which provides scrutiny of government policies and alcohol businesses (Durand et al., 2015). strategies reported in 2012 that the influence of the alcohol industry on policy-making was insidious and The Responsibility Deal, apart from failing to deliver pervasive (UK Parliament, 2012). health benefits, also provided an opportunity for the government to engage in obfuscation and avoid effective intervention and regulation. It led governments to remove Conclusion and outlook the retail price escalator on excise duty for alcohol in each The English story of alcohol public health policy yearly budget. The government has stopped increasing development is one of too little action, too late. Alcohol the real price of alcohol, because industry-friendly has been avoided in major national policies for many advocates lobbied for the freedoms of “moderate drinkers” years. As it has become necessary to acknowledge its while purporting to protect the health of “heavy drinkers”; importance, successive governments have tinkered around the blunt instrument of overall increases of alcohol prices, the edges blaming individuals for their alcohol problems, known to be effective, has therefore not been used for seeing them as feckless or reckless, offering inadequately five years, leading to protracted health harms. funded and variably available individual behavioural and treatment services. More recently, both Labour A major strength of the English public health system with and Conservative governments have concentrated on regard to alcohol policy is a unified view from the public alcohol-related violence in public places. However, they health community and the criminal justice authorities have failed to implement the most effective interventions on the need for firm, effective action to control alcohol possible to limit the supply of alcohol, through regulation, harm. If the health and criminal justice agencies can taxation and legislation. There was also a lack of come together to make the same statements at the same England 21
time it may be possible to overcome the undermining Irish governments. The European ruling in December influence of vested interests. 2015 that minimum unit pricing breaches EU free- trade laws effectively returns the decision to the Scottish Local community safety partnerships (formerly crime government. The Scottish government has now won and disorder reduction partnerships) are an example its case in its own High Court and is in the process of of an overall success story in policy-making and implementing a minimum unit price for alcohol (Scottish local implementation and enforcement. These have government, 2018). Wales will follow suit very shortly survived since 1995 and through four different political (Welsh government, 2017). Most UK national public administrations. health lobby organizations support minimum unit pricing and the UK government may be compelled to act Excellent surveillance of alcohol health problems bring in minimum unit pricing for England before the and crime exists, exemplified by the Fingertips local end of their term of office. It may offer the Exchequer a alcohol profiles maintained by PHE. Nongovernmental small increase in alcohol revenues, although that is not organizations play an important role in collating available its prime purpose, but benefits will accrue, according to evidence, lobbying on alcohol policy and in the provision modelling and international evidence from Canada, to of alcohol services. Academic institutions and public the health and social care systems. Minimum unit pricing health services have also been instrumental in putting has scored highly as a fiscal policy which can deliver its together the evidence base for interventions. Examples are stated objective. the 2012 document published by the North West Public Health Observatory, “Protecting people, promoting health: a public health approach to violence prevention for Expected future developments and lessons learnt England” (Bellis et al., 2012). Furthermore, the Alcohol The PHE evidence review published in December 2016 Health Alliance has drawn up an evidence-based strategy was very important in terms of recognizing the evidence for the UK (Alcohol Health Alliance, 2013), while a on which types of policies are effective and cost-effective Scottish review strengthened the existing evidence base and which are not. It is hoped to support policy efforts to (SHAAP, 2016). Most recently, emerging findings from address alcohol harm. the PHE review confirm the power of the “3As” approach, targeting affordability, acceptability and availability. The idea of protecting the “rights” of moderate drinkers, as promoted by the Portman Group, may become less of a consideration as it becomes recognized that there is no Major threats and obstacles safe level of drinking and that the whole population needs Despite these evidence reviews, the absence of an effective to be protected through raising the real price of alcohol. national strategy and the pedigree of obstruction and The recognition of alcohol as a carcinogen is renewing effective lobbying by the industry does not auger well calls for controls on alcohol labelling, marketing and for the emergence of an effective national strategy in the health warnings. There will be growing expectations for foreseeable future. The policy contradictions in licensing restrictions on sales and for restrictions on the timing and law, reducing taxation and absent regulation make content of alcohol advertisements. alcohol-related harm more likely in the future. There are welcome paper commitments to preventing ill-health In England, as indeed in many other European countries, in major national health strategies from NHS England a new and effective national alcohol strategy that does not and Public Health England. However, the reality on the shy away from controlling industry is necessary. It would ground is one of cuts to local authority funding in general need to be properly resourced for prevention, education, and to public health budgets in particular. The response treatment and rehabilitation and to be supported by to the problem is the exact opposite of what is needed. research and surveillance data. Most of all, it would There is a real prospect of increasing alcohol and other need to learn the lessons from the English experience of public health problems. ineffective and lacking policy measures in the past and of the dangers to population health of colluding with the The Conservative government does not currently alcohol industry. support minimum unit pricing of alcohol. However, it may be forced to follow actions by the Scottish and 22 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Kevin Fenton, Rosanna O’Connor, Clive Henn of Public Health England for their assistance in compiling this report.
References Alcohol Academy (2015). Alcohol brief intervention: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_ where next for IBA? London: Alcohol Academy. digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_133489. (http://www.alcoholacademy.net/uploads/Alcohol%20brief%20 pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). intervention%20-%20where%20next%20for%20IBA_%20 Alcohol%20Academy%20Briefing%202015.pdf, accessed 14 Department of Health (2008). World class commissioning. June 2018). Available at : http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/ Alcohol Health Alliance (2013). Health First, an alcohol strategy groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_080952.pdf, for the UK. Stirling: University of Stirling. (https://www.stir. accessed 14 June 2018). ac.uk/media/schools/management/documents/Alcoholstrategy- updated.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). Department of Health (2009). Chief Medical Officers Annual Report 2008. London: Department of Health. Alcohol Health Alliance (2013). Alcohol and cancer. London: Alcohol Health Alliance UK. (http://12coez15v41j2cf7acjzaodh. Department of Health (2016). UK Chief Medical Officers’ wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/AHA- alcohol guidelines review. Summary of proposed new Alcohol-and-Cancer-report-2013.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). guidelines. London: The Stationery Office. (https://www.gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ BBC News (2013). Ipswich super-strength alcoholic drink file/489795/summary.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). campaign cuts crime. London: BBC. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/ news/uk-england-suffolk-22019200, accessed 14 June 2018). Department of Health (2009). Signs for improvement: commissioning interventions to reduce alcohol -related harm. Bellis MA, Hughes K, Perkins C, Bennett AM (2012). London: The Stationery Office. (http://www.ias.org.uk/uploads/ Protecting people, promoting health: a public health approach to pdf/HSR/dh_104854.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). violence prevention for England. Liverpool: North West Public Health Observatory (Great Britain) and Dept. of Health. Department of Health (2011). Public Health Responsibility Deal: sign up and pledge to improve public health in England. Brown K (2016). Call for labelling and regulation. The London: The Stationery Office. (http://responsibilitydeal.dh.gov. Guardian, 8 January. http://www.theguardian.com/ uk/, accessed 14 June 2018). commentisfree/2016/jan/08/truth-alcohol-labelled-like-food- carcinogen, accessed 14 June 2018). Department of Health (2016b). The alcohol responsibility deal core membership. https://responsibilitydeal.dh.gov.uk/alcohol- Bryden A et al. (2013). Voluntary agreements between network-core-group/, accessed 14 June 2018). government and business: A scoping review of the literature with specific reference to the Public Health Responsibility Deal. Donaldson L (2008). Passive drinking the collateral damage Health Pol.110(2-3):186-97. from alcohol. London: The Stationery Office. (http:// webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/ Chikritzhs T (2009). A healthy dose of scepticism: Four good www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/ reasons to think again about protective effects of alcohol on documents/digitalasset/dh_096229.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). coronary heart disease. Drug Alcohol Rev.28:441–444. Drinkaware (2013). Response of the Board of the Drinkaware Conway E, Oreskes N (2010). Merchants of doubt. New York: Trust to the Drinkaware audit recommendations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Drinkaware. (http://ranzetta.typepad.com/files/response-of- the-board-of-the-drinkaware-trust-to-the-drinkaware-audit- Department of Health (1998). Health of the nation – a policy recommendations-2013.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). assessed. London: The Stationery Office. (http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov. Durand MA, Petticrew M, Goulding L, Eastmure E, uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/ Knai C, Mays N (2015). An evaluation of the Public Health documents/digitalasset/dh_4014481.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). Responsibility Deal: Informants’ experiences and views of the development, implementation and achievements of a pledge- Department of Health (1999). Saving lives: Our healthier based, public-private partnership to improve population health nation. London: The Stationery Office. (https://www.gov. in England. Health Pol.119(11):1506–1514. doi: 10.1016/j. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ healthpol.2015.08.013. file/265576/4386.pdf, accessed 14 June 2018). Florence C et al. (2011). Effectiveness of anonymised Department of Health (2004). Choosing Health: making information sharing and use in health service, police, and local healthier choices easier. London: The Stationery Office. government partnership for preventing violence related injury: (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/ experimental study and time series analysis. BMJ.342:d3313. England 23
Gross O (2016). Cheltenham late-night levy to be scrapped after McCambridge J et al. (2013). Be aware of Drinkaware. scheme flops. The Publican’s Morning Advertiser. 1 February Addiction.109 (4):519–524. doi: 10.1111/add.12356. 2016. (http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Legal/Licensing- law/Cheltenham-late-night-levy-to-be-scrapped-after-scheme- McGill E, Marks D, Sumpter C, Egan M (2015). Removal flops, accessed 12 June 2018). of cheap, super-strength beer and cider to address alcohol- related harms: a qualitative study of a local alcohol availability Hamilton I, Gilmore I (2016). Head to Head: Could campaigns intervention. Lancet 386:S15. (http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/ like Dry January do more harm than good? BMJ.352: i143. doi: journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(15)00853-3.pdf, accessed 12 10.1136/bmj.i143. June 2018).
Hardcastle B (2009). Alcohol needs assessment for Brighton National Audit Office (2008). Reducing Alcohol Harm: and Hove City PCT. Brighton: Brighton & Hove City PCT. health services in England for alcohol misuse. London: (http://www.bhconnected.org.uk/sites/bhconnected/files/ National Audit Office. (https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/ Final%20July%2009%20version%20Alcohol%20Needs%20 uploads/2008/10/07081049.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Assessment%20(1).pdf, accessed 29 June 2018). NHS (2014). NHS five year forward view. London: HM Government (2007). Safe. Sensible. Social. The next steps NHS. (https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/ in the National Alcohol Strategy. London: The Stationery uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Office. (http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/ dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_075219. NHS (2018). Information sharing to tackle violence [online pdf, accessed 16 February 2016). database[. Health and Social Care Information Centre. (http://www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/data_dictionary/messages/ HM Government (2012). The government’s alcohol supporting_data_sets/data_sets/information_sharing_to_ strategy. London: The Stationery Office. (https://www.gov. tackle_violence_minimum_data_set_fr.asp?shownav=1, uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ accessed 12 June 2018). file/224075/alcohol-strategy.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). NICE 2011. Alcohol-use disorders: diagnosis, assessment and HMIC (2015). Working in step: an inspection of local criminal management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence justice partnerships. London: HMIC, HMCPSI, HMI [CG115]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Probation. (https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/ Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg115/resources, wp-content/uploads/local-criminal-justice-partnerships.pdf accessed 12 June 2018). accessed 29 June 2018). NICE (2011b). Costing report. London: National Institute for Holmes J et al. (2015). UK alcohol industry’s “billion units’ Health and Care Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ pledge”: interim evaluation flawed. BMJ.350:h1301. doi: cg115/resources/alcohol-dependence-and-harmful-alcohol-use- 10.1136/bmj.h1301. costing-report-136379341, accessed 16 February 2016).
Home Office (2013). Next steps following consultation on the NICE (2014). Estimating Return on Investment for government’s alcohol strategy. London: Alcohol Team, Home interventions and strategies to prevent and reduce alcohol use. Office. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ Technical Report London: National Institute for Health and uploads/attachment_data/file/223773/Alcohol_consultation_ Care Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/ response_report_v3.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). About/what-we-do/Into-practice/Return-on-Investment/NICE- return-on-investment-alcohol-technical-report.pdf, accessed 12 Hunt L (1995). Doctors’ fury over “safe” drink limits. June 2018). Independent. 13 December. (http://www.independent.co.uk/ news/doctors-fury-over-safe-drink-limits-1525416.html, accessed Perrett M (2015). Full analysis of Cheltenham late night levy. 12 June 2018). The Publican’s Morning Advertiser 12 May 2015 (http://www. morningadvertiser.co.uk/Legal/Licensing-law/Full-analysis- Institute of Alcohol Studies (2015). Dead on arrival? evaluating of-the-Cheltenham-late-night-levy-revelations, accessed 29 the responsibility deal on alcohol. London: Institute of alcohol June 2018). studies. (http://www.ias.org.uk/uploads/pdf/IAS%20reports/ Dead%20on%20Arrival_x3F_%20Evaluating%20the%20 Petticrew M, Eastmure E, Mays N, Knai C, Durand MA, Public%20Health%20Responsibility%20Deal%20for%20 Nolte E (2013). The Public Health Responsibility Deal: how Alcohol.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). should such a complex public health policy be evaluated? J Pub Health.35 (4):495–501. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt064. Islington LBC (2014). Islington late night levy. London: Islington LBC. (https://www.islington.gov.uk/business/licences- Portman Group (2015). Code of Practice on the Naming, permits-registration/alcohol-and-entertainment-licences/late- Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks, fifth edition. night-levy-scheme, accessed 28 June 2018). London: Portman Group. (http://www.portmangroup.org.uk/ docs/default-source/default-document-library/code-of-practice- Knai C et al. (2015a). Are the Public Health Responsibility Deal 14-dec-2015.pdf?sfvrsn=0, accessed 12 June 2018). alcohol pledges likely to improve public health? An evidence synthesis. Addiction.110 (8):1232-46. doi: 10.1111/add.12855. Powerbase (2012). Public Interest Investigations [website]. The Portman Group. Powerbase. (http://www.powerbase.info/index. Knai C. et al. (2015b). The Public Health Responsibility Deal: php/Portman_Group, accessed 12 June 2018). has a public-private partnership brought about action on alcohol reduction? Addiction.110 (8):1217-25. doi: 10.1111/add.12892. Public Health England (2014). From evidence to action: strategy for 2014–16. London: Public Health England. (https://www. 24 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ Royal College of Psychiatrists (2013). Alcohol: our favourite file/366852/PHE_Priorities.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). drug leaflet. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Public Health England (2016a). Local Alcohol Profiles for Scottish Government (2018). Minimum unit pricing: England. London: Public Health England. (http://fingertips.phe. evidence base and final draft guidance on implementation. org.uk/profile/local-alcohol-profiles, accessed 12 June 2018). Edinburgh: Scottish Government. (http://www.gov. scot/Topics/Health/Services/Alcohol/minimum-pricing/ Public Health England (2016b). The public health burden of FinalDraftGuidanceontheImplemenationofMinimumUnitP, alcohol and the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol accessed 12 June 2018). control policies: An evidence review. London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ SHAAP (2016). SHAAPs top twenty: a manifesto for action uploads/attachment_data/file/583047/alcohol_public_health_ on alcohol. Edinburgh: SHAAP – Scottish Health Action on burden_evidence_review.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Alcohol Problems. (http://www.shaap.org.uk/images/shaap- top-20.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Public Health England Alcohol Learning Centre (2016). The Cardiff model. London: UK Government. (http://www. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office (2004). Alcohol, harm alcohollearningcentre.org.uk/LocalInitiatives/projects/ reduction strategy. London: Strategy Unit Cabinet Office. projectDetail/?cid=6476, accessed 21 February 2016). http://alcoholresearchuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ strategy-unit-alcohol-harm-reduction-strategy.pdf, accessed 14 Public Health England Alcohol Learning Centre Archive (2016). June 2018). Models of care for alcohol misuse. London: UK Government, (http://www.alcohollearningcentre.org.uk/_library/BACKUP/ UK Parliament (2012). Health select committee. Proceedings on DH_docs/ALC_Resource_MOCAM.pdf, accessed 14 February the government’s alcohol strategy. (http://www.parliament.uk/ 2016. business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/health- committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/governments-alcohol- Public Health England Alcohol Learning Resources (2016). strategy/ accessed 20 July 2016). Alcohol-use disorders identification test-consumption. London: UK Government. (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ Welsh Government (2017). New law to introduce minimum government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ price for alcohol in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Government. file/684826/Alcohol_use_disorders_identification_test_for_ (http://gov.wales/newsroom/health-and-social-services/2017/ consumption__AUDIT_C_.pdf, accessed 28 June 2018). minimum-price/?lang=en accessed April 13 2018).
Room R (2004). Disabling the public interest: alcohol strategies Whittington C (2009). World class commissioning and and policies for England. Addiction.99(9):1083–1089. alcohol. London: Department of Health. (http://www. alcohollearningcentre.org.uk/Topics/Latest/Resource/?cid=5156, Royal College of Physicians (2001). Alcohol: can the NHS accessed 20 July 2016). afford it? London: Royal College of Physicians. (http://www. alcohollearningcentre.org.uk/_library/alcoholNHS_afford_ Williams C (2011). Community safety partnerships. London: it.pdf, accessed 14 February 2016). Local Government Association. (http://www.local.gov.uk/c/ document_library/get_file?uuid=141c8088-416f-4bc2-ba2e- Royal College of Psychiatrists (1979). Our favourite drug. a2cffd3276e6&groupId=10180, accessed 20 July 2016). London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. Wood C (2014). Rethink your drink: Annual public health Royal College of Psychiatrists (1986). Alcohol: Our favourite report 2014. Gateshead: Gateshead Council. (http://www. drug: New report on alcohol and alcohol-related problems gateshead.gov.uk/DocumentLibrary/CBS/health/DPH-Report- from a Special Committee of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. (August-2014).pdf, accessed 20 July 2016). London: Tavistock Publications, London, New York.
Antimicrobial resistance
John Middleton, Ellen Bloomer
The scale of the challenge
The UK is a global leader on tackling antimicrobial Health Security Agenda (GHSA), Food and Agriculture resistance (AMR). It co-sponsored the resolution at the Organization (FAO), World Organisation for Animal World Health Assembly to create the Global Action Health (OIE) and the Organization for Economic Package on AMR, is one of the leading countries for the Cooperation and Development (OECD). Global Health Security Agenda AMR action package (World Health Assembly, 2013; HM Government, In England, health care-associated infections (HAI) 2013a; G8, 2013) and contributes to international became headline news in the 1990s, with concern about leadership of the global agenda through continued work methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with the World Health Organization (WHO), Global and Clostridium difficile. Public and political pressure England 25
expedited radical reform, especially in hospital infection bloodstream infections means that more individuals have control. Key changes included mandatory reporting, had a significant antibiotic-resistant infection. Increases infection reduction targets and a requirement for the in K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections and the Chief Executive of NHS Trusts to manage, report and proportion of these infections which were drug resistant audit infection rates (CMO, 2013). New challenges are means the number of individuals with antibiotic-resistant emerging, especially with the Gram-negative bacteria infections increased substantially between 2010 and 2014. Enterobacteriaceae (including E. coli, Klebsiella and Areas with high levels of antibiotic prescribing also have related species). These are now the most frequent cause high levels of resistance (Public Health England, 2015a). of hospital-acquired infection. European data suggest a 30% mortality for patients with septicaemia due to The highest combined general practice, hospital and multiresistant E. coli, compared with 15% for those with dentist usage in England in 2014 was in Merseyside at susceptible E. coli. This greatly exceeds current mortality 27.7 DDD per 1 000 inhabitants per day. This was 30% due to MRSA and C. difficile (CMO, 2013). higher than in the Thames Valley, which had the lowest usage of antibiotics at 21.3 DDD per 1 000 inhabitants Between 2012 and 2016, antibiotic prescribing declined per day. The highest prescribing from general practice by 5.1%, when measured as defined daily doses (DDD) was in Durham, Darlington and Tees at 21.1 DDD per per 1 000 inhabitants per day, with declines across 1 000 inhabitants (Public Health England, 2015a). This the majority of antibiotic groups. However, there is was over 40% higher than in London which had the significant regional variation in antibiotic use (Public lowest level of antibiotic prescribing from general practice Health England, 2017b). Antibiotic use in primary in England at 14.3 DDD per 1 000 inhabitants. This may care when measured by DDD is higher than when reflect health care access and delivery in London, where measured by prescription, suggesting that longer courses there may be a shift from general practice prescribing or higher doses are being used. Penicillins are the most to local hospitals and private health care (Public Health frequently prescribed antibiotic in general practice. England, 2015a). Within secondary care, doctors tend to prescribe the “last line” broad-spectrum antibiotics (carbapenems and Antibiotics sold for use in food-producing animals has piperacillin-tazobactam), rather than narrow spectrum fallen by 27% since 2014 to a multi-species average of 45 antibiotics (Public Health England, 2015a). mg/kg in 2016, exceeding a government commitment to an average of 50 mg/kg by 2018 two years early (Veter Many patients are being inappropriately prescribed an inary Medicines Directorate, 2017). Clinical resistance is antibiotic, most commonly to treat upper respiratory uncommon in animal health in the UK and resistance in viral infections. Estimates suggest that as many as half key veterinary zoonotic microorganisms (that can cause of all patients who visit their GP with a cough or cold disease in humans) are generally among the lowest in the leave with a prescription for antibiotics. A third of the European Union (EU) (Veterinary Medicines Directorate, public believe that antibiotics will treat coughs and 2017). Furthermore, sales of certain critically important colds and one in five people expect antibiotics when antibiotics remain low. they visit their doctor. GPs commonly express concerns that they feel pressured by patients asking for antibiotics, particularly when prescribing for children (Public Policies and programmes Health England, 2015a; Hawker et al., 2014). However, The Chief Medical Officer (CMO) for England high a positive development was observed in 2015, which lighted the ever growing problem of AMR in her annual saw a decline in the use of antibiotics across the health report for 2011 (CMO, 2013). As a result of the CMO’s system, including both hospitals and primary health recommendations, antibiotic resistance has been added care. The number of antibiotic prescriptions declined by to the national risk register for major disasters and 2.2 million, equivalent to 6% of all prescriptions (Public threats to health (Cabinet Office, 2015). This means it is Health England, 2016). prioritized alongside influenza pandemic, major flooding and terrorist threats. In July 2014 the UK Prime Minister In England, E. coli is the most common cause of bacterial commissioned Jim O’Neill to produce eight reports infection in the blood. Although the proportion of E. coli on AMR, which are informing government awareness that are resistant to antibiotics used to treat infections and action on AMR (HM Government, 2014b; HM has remained constant, the increased incidence of 26 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
Government, 2015a; HM Government, 2015b; HM a national framework for IPC across the health care Government, 2016a). The final report, published in 2016, system, providing strategic direction on leadership included a number of wide-ranging recommendations and governance, roles and responsibilities, quality and around reducing demand for antimicrobials and standards, education and training, streamlining and increasing the supply of new antimicrobials. The standardizing guidance. The National Institute for government announced a key ambition later that year Health and Care Excellence (NICE) – the main health to halve the numbers of health care-associated Gram- technology assessment agency in England – published negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) by March 2021 new guidance around health care-associated infections and to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing by in 2016 (NICE, 2016). The Royal College of Nursing 50% by 2021 (HM Government, 2016a; Public Health and the Infection Prevention Society (IPS) have produced England, 2017a). joint guidance to support commissioning of IPC in health and care settings (RCN, 2014). The Department The UK has a cross-government National Antimicrobial for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Resistance Strategy “UK 5 Year Antimicrobial Resistance provides guidance for on-farm biosecurity in relation Strategy 2013 to 2018” (HM Government, 2013a). The to specific disease risks and, across livestock sectors, to strategy focuses activities around three strategic aims: encourage the prevention of disease introduction onto improving the knowledge and understanding of AMR, farms (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ conserving and stewardship of the effectiveness of department-for-environment-food-rural-affairs/services- existing treatments, and stimulating the development information). of new antibiotics, diagnostics and novel therapies. The three strategic aims of the AMR strategy are underpinned by actions in seven key areas, which were informed by the Optimizing prescribing practice 2011 European Union Antimicrobial Resistance Strategic Work on optimizing prescribing practice includes Action Plan (EU, 2011). The seven key areas for action developing enhanced education and training in the are: improving infection prevention and control practices; prescribing and administration of antibiotics, identifying optimizing prescribing practice; improving professional the optimum arrangements for recording and reporting education, training and public engagement; developing of data as well as analysis of data on antibiotic use, new drugs, treatments and diagnostics; better access to resistance and clinical outcomes. and use of surveillance data; better identification and prioritization of AMR research needs; and strengthened NICE has published a national guideline on antimicrobial international collaboration. The Strategy was also subject stewardship (NICE, 2015). This recommends developing to an impact assessment (HM Government, 2013b). systems to provide regular updates to individual prescribers and prescribing leads on individual prescribing. An implementation plan for England was produced based These are benchmarked against local and national on the strategy and there are annual reports on progress antimicrobial prescribing rates and trends collated by using a range of monitoring indicators (HM Government, PHE. NICE has also published a guideline on changing 2014). The implementation plan follows a One Health risk-related behaviours in the general population (NICE, approach seeking to implement the same actions in both 2017). This guideline addresses how to make people the human and animal health sectors where appropriate aware of how to correctly use antibiotics and the dangers (One Health Initiative, 2011). Some specific actions associated with their overuse and misuse. in the animal health sector are separately identified. Currently ongoing within the AMR programme, are Evidence suggests that informing prescribers of their multiple working groups looking at a range of policies on prescribing patterns compared with peer professionals can AMR. The devolved administrations (Scotland, Wales then help them change their practices (Charani et al., 2011). and Northern Ireland), while part of the UK strategy, Since April 2009 use of quality prescribing indicators in have their own implementation plans. hospital and primary care settings in NHS Scotland has improved the quality of antibiotic use (Nathwani et al., 2012; NHS Education for Scotland, 2013). Infection prevention and control The National Infection prevention and control In 2015, PHE advised NHS England on the development (IPC) Steering Group supports the development of of a Quality Premium for antibiotic use (NHS England, England 27
2015a). This encourages Clinical Commissioning Groups Jointly with the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (CCGs) to reduce prescribing of antibiotics in primary (FVE), the VMD undertook a study involving more than care settings by at least 1% from 2013–2014 levels. CCGs 3 000 practitioners working in 25 countries to determine have also been asked to reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic the factors that influence antibiotic prescribing habits. prescribing as a percentage of the total antibiotics This study will inform interventions to help improve prescribed in primary care by 10% from 2013–2014. prescribing habits in veterinary medicine (De Briyne et al., Within secondary care, the Quality Premium aims to 2014). The Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture ensure that secondary care providers, with 10% or more (RUMA) alliance has published an action plan setting of their activity being commissioned by the relevant out education and engagement activities to promote CCG, have validated their total antibiotic prescription responsible use of antibiotics in livestock production data. The validated total antibiotic prescribing data will (RUMA, 2014). The Pig Veterinary Society (PVS) has be available for each Trust at the end of each financial published antimicrobial prescribing principles to inform year on the government website (NHS England, 2015b). veterinary surgeons treating pigs, adding to guidance already published by the British Veterinary Association PHE has developed two national toolkits to support a (BVA), the British Small Animal Veterinary Association reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in (BSAVA), British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA) England. “Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, and RUMA. Education, and Tools (TARGET)” for primary care was developed with the Royal College of General Practitioners and “Start Smart – then Focus” has been developed for Improving professional education, training and secondary care (Royal College of General Practitioners, public engagement 2016; Public Health England, 2015b). NICE guidelines Antibiotic awareness campaigns in England using recommend that health care professionals use these posters or leaflets have had little or no impact on know toolkits as part of their improvement of practice to assess ledge, behaviour or prescription rates (Akiru-Oredope their antibiotic prescribing rates against others. The and Hopkins, 2015). To change behaviour and reduce toolkits also provide advice on the importance of shared antibiotic use, a coordinated and comprehensive decision-making with patients. interdisciplinary and multifaceted (multimodal) approach using behavioural science and targeted at specific In animal health, guidance has been strengthened to groups (both professional and public), is required. The reflect the government position that routine preventive Antibiotic Guardian Campaign is one such multimodal use of antibiotics is unacceptable. A position statement campaign which has been running since 2015 linked has been published advising vets on use of the “cascade” into the European Antibiotic Awareness Day (EAAD). legislation to ensure responsible prescribing. In The Antibiotic Guardians programme is urging all parallel to the revisions made to the Royal College of health care professionals and members of the public Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) Practice Standards Scheme, to sign up and help overcome AMR. Nearly 60 000 “responsible use” has been included within the Veterinary people and 263 organizations have already signed up. Medicines Directorate (VMD) veterinary practice By encouraging people to become Antibiotic Guardians premises inspections to assess how practices implement and collecting pledges, PHE expects to go beyond simply responsible use principles. The Royal Veterinary College raising awareness and help people to take at least one and Liverpool University operate veterinary audit concrete personal action, leading to much wider changes programmes (VetCompass and Savs Net, respectively), in behaviour (Antibiotic Guardian, 2018). An online which veterinary practices sign up to on a voluntary basis survey of 9 016 Antibiotic Guardians in 2015 found that to receive comparative data on antibiotic prescribing for making the pledge increased commitment to tackling companion animals. AMR in both health professionals and members of the public, increased self-reported knowledge and changed The UK participates closely in the development of EU self-reported behaviour (Chaintarli et al., 2016). guidance on responsible assessment, authorization and prescription of antibiotics, and contributed to the In October 2017, Public Health England launched an collation of the EU Commission Guidelines for prudent awareness campaign, “Keep Antibiotics Working” follow use of antimicrobials in veterinary practice. ing a pilot earlier in the year, to support national efforts 28 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
to reduce inappropriate prescriptions for antibiotics. human health, and “pen-side” diagnostics for animal The focus of this campaign was on tackling the lack of health. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) with understanding and the inappropriate prescribing through the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory reducing patient pressure for antibiotics. The aims of the Agency (MHRA) reviewed licensing arrangements and pilot were to alert the public to the issue of AMR, reduce introduced new flexibilities with regard to antibiotics public expectations for antibiotics and support change (EMA, 2015). The UK Government Strategy for Life among health care professionals. Sciences (HM Government, 2011) seeks to improve the long-term environment for UK health and life sciences. Involving patients in shared decision-making can reduce The research councils as the main national funders for the number of antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory academic research in the UK, are being encouraged infections and is promoted in the TARGET toolkit to work cooperatively. The Small Business Research and the NICE guideline on antimicrobial stewardship Initiative continues to support small and medium sized (Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016; NICE, enterprises (SMEs) to overcome barriers and get new 2015). However in a search of patient nationally technologies to market. A joint Innovate UK/ MRC representative bodies (Patients Association, National Biomedical Catalyst scheme provides responsive and Voices, HealthWatch UK), only the Patients Association effective support for the best translational life science made any reference to the importance of AMR (Patients opportunities arising in the UK, both academic and Association, 2015). in SMEs, to move their research more quickly from discovery to commercialization. The DHSC supports Under the national strategy, the Department of Health & the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative (EUIMI). Social Care (DHSC) is working with the royal colleges, which are the professional bodies for medical specialities across the UK, to incorporate more on antibiotic use and Better access to and use of surveillance data resistance in undergraduate and postgraduate curricula The English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial for practitioners. For example, a wide range of activities Utilization and Resistance (ESPAUR), is the cornerstone have been undertaken by the VMD with the Royal of surveillance in England. Surveillance covers both Veterinary College. resistant organisms and prescribing of antimicrobials, in primary and secondary care, using clinical and laboratory data (Akiru-Oredope and Hopkins, 2013). Further to this, Developing new drugs, treatments and the team are working on the development of surveillance diagnostics programmes that can link to electronic prescribing The final O’Neill review was published in May 2016. It systems as they are introduced. Much of the work aims calls for large incentives for entry into new antibiotic to improve the quality and standardization of routine research and production and for large incentives to testing and the interpretation of results with the goal of apply to antibiotics and alternative medical therapies. being able to link human and veterinary data under a O’Neill suggests paying companies 1 billion US dollars One Health approach. In animal health, improvement (0.7 billion pounds sterling) for every new antibiotic of surveillance capability is the highest priority and is discovered, financial incentives to develop new tests to moving towards specific diagnostic and prescribing data. prevent antibiotics being given when they will not work, The Veterinary Medicines Directorate has published two and promoting the use of vaccines and alternatives to combined reports on antimicrobial sales and on antibiotic drugs. O’Neill calls for the programme to be funded susceptibility of veterinary pathogens, the UK Veterinary from a small surcharge on all health expenditures, and Antibiotic Resistance and Sales Surveillance Report from a tax on pharmaceutical companies not involved (VARSS) (Veterinary Medicines Directorate, 2017). in antibiotic development. The report also asks why antibiotics should be prescribed at all in the absence of a The UK supports the EU “Early Warning Response definitive diagnosis (HM Government, 2016a). System” (EWRS-ECDC, 2016a) facilitating routine AMR data collection, risk assessments alerting Member There has been a research call for new diagnostics; States urgently to significant resistant infections, and the the Longitude Prize will reward new innovations European Antibiotic Awareness Day (EAAD) campaign in treatments and diagnostics to reduce AMR, (ECDC, 2016b). particularly encouraging point of care diagnostics for England 29
Better identification and prioritization of AMR is supporting work to inform the Chinese government’s research needs approach to containing AMR with UK experience. New mechanisms are in place to improve collaboration The VMD has supported the Royal Veterinary College between research bodies and fund new research to undertake an economic review for the World Bank spanning both human and animal health. To this end, on the impact of AMR on livestock production, and the Medical Research Council (MRC) has established is funding research into optimal prescribing of certain an Antimicrobial Resistance Funders’ Forum which antimicrobials and the impact of prebiotics in turkey comprises all seven research councils, the Wellcome production. It is also funding EU research into novel Trust, DHSC, the National Institute for Health Research methodologies for control of C. difficile enteritis in pigs. (NIHR), the Innovate UK, DEFRA/ VMD, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and health departments in In addition, it is funding research by Liverpool University Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The forum is into the “motivators” of antimicrobial prescribing in the promoting and coordinating joint action to improve our pig sector (Coyne et al., 2014; 2016). The results from understanding of AMR and address gaps in the evidence this study are being analysed, together with the results base. Two Health Protection Research Units have been set from similar studies in the equine and dairy sectors up at, one at Oxford University (genome sequencing) and and the results of the VMD/FVE European wide one at Imperial College London (infection prevention survey of veterinary prescribing habits, to inform future and prescribing behaviours). interventions to encourage behaviour change. In animal health, a number of research projects have been funded to identify new approaches aimed at minimizing Problem identification and issue endemic disease impact, and to understand the factors recognition which influence farmers’ behaviour in relation to disease control. Current projects include a research fellowship The English CMO’s report identified the problem and focusing on the costs and cumulative benefits of specific resulted in the creation of the Five Year UK strategy plan biosecurity measures for farmers. (DHSC, DEFRA, Welsh Government, Northern Ireland Executive, Scottish Government, 2013). The CMO is The UK is active in research collaborations in the EU, the most senior adviser to government on health matters; the USA, and the Commonwealth. On behalf of the UK, her post is in DHSC and she is on the board of the the MRC is leading the EU Joint Programming Initiative NHS in England. This is the high level agenda for the (JPI) on AMR which aims to coordinate research activity control of AMR in England. The strategy is overseen across 17 Member States, Norway, Switzerland, Canada, by a High Level Steering Group (HLSG) which agreed Israel and Turkey. The UK supports the EU sponsored an implementation plan from which DEFRA, DHSC Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) that involves and Public Health England (PHE) set their departmental working with small and medium sized businesses. The AMR policy agendas. The government departments UK Government’s Fleming Fund is making 265 million and agencies reporting to the HLSG are the principal pounds sterling available to support surveillance of drug bodies involved in agenda-setting through the five-year resistance and enhance laboratory capacity in low and strategy and the implementation plan arising from it. All middle income countries (Wellcome Trust, 2013). these agencies are also involved in problem identification through the extensive surveillance programmes they AMR is a priority for the Foreign & Commonwealth have set up, and through the programme of research they Office, the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial have commissioned. Strategy and the Science and Innovation Network (SIN), with significant engagement globally. Projects supporting For AMR, collaboration occurs across DEFRA, DHSC, international collaboration between the UK and overseas NHS England and PHE and equivalent devolved researchers and policy-makers are being led by SIN teams administration health bodies in Scotland, Northern in Japan, USA, Brazil and India. New partnerships Ireland and Wales. The AMR programme mechanisms have been developed with the Indian Department of for collaboration are described in detail in the section on Biotechnology in AMR. The British Embassy in Beijing Policies and programmes. There is also a DHSC, PHE 30 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
and NHS England liaison group and NHS England has through local actors is achieved through influencing representation on the AMR Programme delivery boards. and persuasion.
Supportive systems are in place which include Policy formulation information systems, decision tools and clinical audit tools to guide decision-making by public health DHSC is responsible for health policy in England. services. ESPAUR provides national level surveillance Governing the AMR Programme is the HLSG, to which for England for human pathogens – its annual reports DHSC, DEFRA and PHE are accountable. PHE is provide recommendations for further action by primary responsible for policy recommendations to DHSC and and secondary health agencies and professionals. VARSS for policy implementation. The group holds overarching provides an integrated UK report on sales of antibiotics responsibility for the implementation of the National for all animals (including bees and fish) and for resistance AMR Strategy across both human and animal sectors. in pathogens of livestock. PHE, jointly working with the equivalent public health and health protection organizations in Scotland, Wales Since 2016, PHE has collected and published locally and Northern Ireland, has overall responsibility for comparable data on the Fingertips Public Health coordinating cross-government activity relating to Profiles for local government and health services. delivery of the human health aspects of the AMR This summarizes health care-associated infections, programme for the UK. Joint working with DEFRA and antimicrobial prescribing, antibiotic resistance, infection other relevant partners takes place on aspects relating prevention and control measurements and enables local to the human-animal interface. PHE is responsible action plans to be prepared. for leading the human health aspects of AMR work, bringing together relevant partners to address the seven areas of the AMR strategy (HM Government, 2013a). Policy implementation In addition there is a robust third sector lobby, Save our Antibiotics, and the industry representative body, Implementation of AMR policies in England is through Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture (RUMA). Public Health England, NHS England and the VMD A full list of the agencies is available online (http://www. (DEFRA). Local authorities are responsible for local saveourantibiotics.org/alliance-members/ and http://www. public health policies and services. Local authority ruma.org.uk/about/ruma-members/). Directors of Public Health (DsPH) are expected to: work with local stakeholders to provide information and advice to the public regarding steps they can take to address Decision-making AMR; work with CCGs to ensure effective antimicrobial stewardship and support the implementation of the Policy decisions on the strategy are made by relevant NICE guidelines on antimicrobial stewardship; and Ministers in the UK government and the devolved ensure there are effective infection prevention and control administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern governance arrangements in their local area. They can Ireland. More operational-level decisions are made at use their annual public health reports to inform AMR the HLSG, led and administered by the DHSC. The stewardship and they should also use the joint strategic Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and needs assessment in which they play a key role, to inform Healthcare Acquired Infections (ARHAI) provides expert local policy and priority for AMR. DsPH are statutory independent scientific advice to the HLSG. members of the local Health and Wellbeing Board. This is the body which oversees policy and investment in In spite of the strong body of policy and supporting health and social care between local government and the resources at the national level in England, command local Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG). This key and control structures are very limited. PHE advises and body needs to understand and agree local programmes supports local public health activity in local authorities, for AMR stewardship and investment. NHS England and Clinical Commissioning Groups (the purchasers of many health services) but it is not in a To date, the local authority roles and actions on AMR direct management or command relationship. DEFRA have been patchy and limited. PHE estimates that only has no regional structures. Much of the action possible one fifth of local authorities have antibiotic stewardship steering groups in place (Public Health England, 2015a). England 31
Some local authorities and/or health economies have related. There is also a strong research strategy, coherent set up health protection committees which cover health across health and veterinary sciences. There is excellent protection, immunization and screening arrangements, research also in the environmental and ecological sciences following the reorganization of the NHS in England in to support policy-making. 2013 (Public Health England, 2015a). The ambition of the current strategy is only to return Budgets for AMR control are poorly defined with funds antibiotic prescribing to 2010 levels (Department of tied up in general microbial services, veterinary services Health, 2013). This may have been pragmatic and and infection control and in training and the clinical realistic given the trends and as a first stage in what will governance budgets of individual public health and be a long-term strategy. However, the final O’Neill report NHS services. Specific budgets are identified in research, injects a new level of ambition and challenge for the UK surveillance and in the PHE central team. Within current AMR strategy, in the UK and globally. It calls for an reductions in budgets for PHE, AMR is being given urgent and massive global awareness campaign as most priority, in recognition of the level of threat, and PHE people are ignorant of the risks; establishing a 2 billion US is likely to extend its central coordinating, scientific and dollar Global Innovation Fund for early stage research; technical resources on AMR. improved access to clean water, sanitation and cleaner hospitals to prevent infections spreading; reducing the Enforcement responsibilities are held by the Veterinary unnecessary heavy antibiotic use in agriculture including Medicines Division, the Food Standards Agency and local a ban on those “highly critical” to human health; and authority environmental health services but enforcement improved surveillance of the spread of drug resistance. In is limited in its applications and under-resourced. Policies 2016 the former Prime Minister proposed an ambition of of persuasion and behaviour change are most favoured. halving inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing by 2020 and a sustained reduction in health care-associated gram negatives (Prime Minister’s Office, 2016). Monitoring and evaluation There are robust surveillance systems in the health Public Health England is the lead agency for the services for AMR and for prescribing in primary and substantial surveillance programme in England. PHE secondary care and for AMR and antibiotic sales in has developed the English Surveillance Programme for the animal health sector. These are summarized in the Antimicrobial Utilization and Resistance (ESPAUR) extensive annual reports of the ESPAUR system. (Ashiru-Orredope and Hopkins, 2013). This monitors the way antibiotics are prescribed and obtained from There have been major efforts to increase public and pharmacies across the NHS in England. Four annual patient awareness about the need to protect antibiotics. reports have now been completed by ESPAUR with The Antibiotic Guardian programme, social marketing recommendations for further action. Veterinary and awareness campaigns, and the Longitude Prize are prescribing is monitored through VARSS (Veterinary novel innovations raising public awareness of the problem. Medicines Directorate, 2017). Annual reports of progress on the full AMR strategy are also produced (HM Despite having many of the building blocks in place, Government, 2014a). The High Level Steering Group, suboptimal prescribing behaviours and antibiotic usage and the agencies represented on it are responsible for continue in the health care sector and animal health. It monitoring progress. is clear that major change in prescribing behaviour and patient knowledge and expectations will be needed in health care settings to sustain reductions in prescribing Conclusion and outlook (King’s Fund, 2016). Senior officials in DHSC and In England (and in the UK), there is a high degree of PHE recognize this and there is no complacency. The cross-departmental collaboration which is evident in Behavioural Insights team under the Cabinet Office are national policy documents. The UK also has a strong undertaking novel research into prescribing behaviours national policy framework and strategy. There is a clear in the health sector. commitment from politicians and from professionals and recognition of the One Health policy approach that In animal health, weaknesses in antibiotic prescribing is needed as animal and human health are inextricably surveillance are recognized and efforts are being made 32 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
towards more species-specific data and prescribing-dose government cuts to local public health budgets make data. At present only the weights of antibiotic sold and commitment to antibiotic stewardship less likely to used are recorded. The extent of purchasing unauthorized happen. Cuts to the Public Health England budget or illegal antibiotics over the Internet is unknown, and reduce generic capacity in communicable disease control with the current resources available for enforcement it and weakens the translation of national policy to local is unlikely to be able to fully identify the scale of the action. There are weak lines of communication and problem and be able to deal with it effectively. Major command from national government to local, in public concerns about the volume of antibiotic use in the health, in the NHS and in rural affairs which limit the agricultural sector and about the control of antibiotic effectiveness of implementation at the local level. In 2016 waste remain (HM Government, 2015b). This is a major PHE sought to stimulate local action plans on AMR concern and while there appears to be strong political by publishing its local Fingertips profiles on AMR and commitment from the top, resources committed so far asking Health and Wellbeing Boards to act. are not commensurate with the scale of change required. Despite the high quality of the strategy, the excellent Antibiotic contamination of the environment is a science and surveillance systems, it is not yet translating growing concern internationally. This is primarily via to sustainable changes inpatient expectations and agricultural run-off, wastewater treatment plants and prescribing behaviours in primary care, at the bedside, or industrial manufacturing of antibiotics. In 2016 the the pen-side. UK government published guidance on the handling of manure and slurry to reduce antibiotic resistance (HM The impacts of Brexit on AMR will depend on the Government, 2016b). Environmental contamination is nature of continued UK/EU and other international likely to be a greater problem in countries with greater use relationships going forward. Many of the initiatives and of antibiotics in agriculture, more antibiotic production collaborations discussed in this case study are with the and lower environmental standards, yet the UK can EU. International collaboration is crucial given the cross- help to address this through international leadership and border nature of AMR and the importance of global antibiotic procurement practices. There appears to be trade and travel, for example UK involvement in the a need to invest more in environmental and ecological EU “Early Warning Response System” allows countries studies looking at the impacts of antibiotic resistance to implement more effective communicable disease in soils, beaches and other natural environments, control. It is important that the UK maintains strong from agricultural, patients and other sources. There relationships with the EU and continues to share best is insufficient evidence of the scale of the problem or practice on AMR. action to address it. However, waiting for a more robust evidence base may take too long and action should be In conclusion, policy commitment from the national level taken based on the precautionary principle (Bloomer and is strong but coordination could still be improved. The McKee, 2018). strengthened PHE AMR team needs to be able to take on the coordinating role, but needs support from NHS The Conservative government which came to power in England. There is a need to engage health care providers 2015 continued the existing strategy and there is ongoing in the private sector more strongly and other agencies commitment from the Prime Minister. However, the such as the Food Standards Agency. There is a need health service reforms of 2013 (the Health and Social for concerted efforts on public and patient education, Care Act) greatly weakened coordinated local responses and stronger efforts with patient representative groups. to infection control and health protection which had There should be growing emphasis on the co-production been in place from 2004 in the form of district control of healthier outcomes for patients and satisfaction for of infection committees with district infection control doctors and patients in overcoming illnesses, without officers (DIPCs) in primary care trusts. Funding routine antibiotic prescription. Greater engagement of arrangements and responsibilities for local infection patient representative organizations should be encouraged control have lacked clarity following implementation to support this. The need for clinical procedures of the Health and Social Care Act 2013. Fewer than which are undertaken under antibiotic protection, for one fifth of CCG areas in England currently have an example caesarean sections, need to be fundamentally antibiotic stewardship committee or arrangements reassessed. Preventive interventions such as influenza in place (Public Health England, 2015a). In addition, and pneumococcal vaccines need to be encouraged to England 33
prevent illnesses, which may result in avoidable antibiotic resistance in human and animal health care, the era of prescriptions. Major investment in basic hand hygiene antibiotics, and a century of individualized health care, and personal hygiene measures will also be needed. If may be over. we are not able to rise to the challenge of antimicrobial
References Antibiotic Guardian (2018). Become an antibiotic livestock and poultry keepers. London: DEFRA. (https://www. guardian [website]. London: Public Health England. gov.uk/disease-prevention-for-livestock-farmers, accessed 12 (http://antibioticguardian.com, accessed 12 June 2018). June 2018).
Ashiru-Oredope D, Hopkins S; English Surveillance ECDC (2016a). Early Warning Response System [website]. Programme for Antimicrobial Utilization and Resistance Stockholm: ECDC. (https://ewrs.ecdc.europa.eu/, accessed 12 Oversight Group (2013). Antimicrobial stewardship: June 2018). English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilization and Resistance (ESPAUR). J Antimicrob ECDC (2016b). European antibiotic awareness day. Solna: Chemother.68(11):2421–2423. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/eaad/antibiotics-about/Pages/about- Ashiru-Oredope D, Hopkins S (2015). Antimicrobial resistance: eaad.aspx, accessed 12 June 2018). moving from professional engagement to public action. J Antimicrob Chemother.70(11):2927–2930. doi: 10.1093/jac/ EU (2011). EU Action plan against the rising threats from dk v297. Antimicrobial Resistance, COM (2011) 748. Brussels: European Commission. (http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/docs/ Bloomer E, McKee M (2018) Policy options for reducing communication_amr_2011_748_en.pdf, accessed 13 January antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant genes in the environment. 2016). Journal of Public Health Policy, Oct 8 [Epub ahead of print]. European Medicines Agency (2015). European medicines Cabinet Office (2015). National risk register of civil agencies network strategy to 2020. London: European emergencies. London: Cabinet Office. (https://www.gov. Medicines Agency. (http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/ uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ document_library/Other/2015/03/WC500185138.pdf, accessed file/419549/20150331_2015-NRR-WA_Final.pdf, accessed 12 12 June 2018). June 2018). G8 (2013). Policy paper. G8 science ministers statement: Chaintarli K, Ingle SM, Bhattacharya A, Ashiru-Oredope D, London, 12 June 2013. London: UK Government. (https://www. Oliver I, Gobin M (2016). Impact of a United Kingdom-wide gov.uk/government/publications/g8-science-ministers-statement- campaign to tackle antimicrobial resistance on self-reported london-12-june-2013, accessed 12 June 2018). knowledge and behavior change. BMC Public Health.16:393. Hawker JI, Smith S, Smith GE, Morbey R, Johnson AP, Charani E et al. (2011). Behaviour change strategies to influence Fleming DM et al. (2014). Trends in antibiotic prescribing antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: a systematic review. Clin in primary care for clinical syndromes subject to national Infect Dis.53(7):651–662. recommendations to reduce antibiotic resistance, UK 1995– 2011: analysis of a large database of primary care consultations. CMO (2013).Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer, J Antimicrob Chemother.69(12):3423–3430. doi: 10.1093/jac/ Volume 2, 2011. Infections and the rise of anti-microbial dku291. resistance. London: HM Government. (https://www.gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ HM Government (2011). Strategy for UK life sciences. file/138331/CMO_Annual_Report_Volume_2_2011.pdf, London: Departments of Health and BIS. (https://www.gov. accessed 12 June 2018). uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/32457/11-1429-strategy-for-uk-life- sciences.pdf, accessed 12 Coyne LA, Pinchbeck GL, Williams NJ, Smith RF, Dawson S, June 2018). Pearson RB, Latham SM (2014). Understanding antimicrobial use and prescribing behaviours by pig veterinary surgeons and HM Government (2013a). UK five-year antimicrobial resistance farmers: a qualitative study. Vet Rec.175(23):593. doi: 10.1136/ strategy 2013–18. London: HM Government. (https://www. vr.102686. gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/244058/20130902_UK_5_year_AMR_strategy.pdf, Coyne LA, Latham SM, Williams NJ, Dawson S, Donald IJ, accessed 12 June 2018). Pearson RB, Smith RF, Pinchbeck GL (2016). Understanding the culture of antimicrobial prescribing in agriculture: a HM Government (2013b). AMR strategy impact assessment. qualitative study of UK pig veterinary surgeons. J Antimicrob London: Department of Health. (https://www.gov.uk/ Chemother.71(11):3300–3312. government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/238876/AMR_Strategy_Impact_Assessment_-_ de Briyne N, Atkinson J, Borriello P, Pokludova L (2014). FINAL_22_August_2013.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Antibiotics used most commonly to treat animals in Europe. Vet Rec.175 (13):325. doi:10.1136/vr.102462. DEFRA (2015). HM Government (2013c). Antibiotic resistance – a threat to Keeping farmed animals – guidance: Disease prevention for global health security and the case for action, side event during 34 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance
the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly held in May 2013. NHS Education for Scotland (2013). Scottish Reduction in International action to tackle AMR. London: HM Government. Antibiotic Prescribing Programme. Glasgow: NHS Education (https://www.gov.uk/government/world-location-news/main- for Scotland. (http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/media/2725088/ messages-from-wha-seminar-on-antibiotic-resistance, accessed nesd0189_scrap_guide_vfinal.pdf, accessed 24 May 2016). 12 June 2018). NICE (2015). Antimicrobial stewardship: systems and processes HM Government (2014a). AMR annual report. London: HM for effective antimicrobial medicine use. NICE guidelines Government. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ [NG15]. London: National Institute for Health and Care uploads/attachment_data/file/385733/UK_AMR_annual_ Excellence. (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng15, accessed report.pdf, accessed 24 May 2016). 12 June 2018).
HM Government (2014b). Anti-microbial resistance. Tackling NICE (2016). Healthcare-associated infections QS113. London: a global crisis for the health and wealth of nations. The Review National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (https://www. on Antimicrobial Resistance, Chaired by Jim O’Neill. London: nice.org.uk/guidance/qs113, accessed 12 June 2018). HM Government. (http://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/ AMR%20Review%20Paper%20-%20Tackling%20a%20 NICE (2017). Antimicrobial stewardship: changing risk-related crisis%20for%20the%20health%20and%20wealth%20of%20 behaviours in the general population. London: National nations_1.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (https://www.nice.org. uk/guidance/ng63, accessed 12 June 2018). HM Government (2014c). Veterinary anti-microbial resistance and sales surveillance. London: HM Government. One Health Initiative (2011). One Health Initiative. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/veterinary- (http://www.onehealthinitiative.com/news_archived. antimicrobial-resistance-and-sales-surveillance-2014, accessed php?page=4, accessed 24 May 2016). 24 May 2016). Patients Association (2015). Antimicrobial resistance: a patient HM Government (2015a). Tackling a global crisis: first steps. safety issues. London: The Patients Association. (http://www. The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, Chaired by Jim patients-association.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/press- O’Neill. London: HM Government. (https://amr-review.org/ release-report-on-antimicrobial-resistance.pdf, accessed 13 sites/default/files/Report-52.15.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). January 2016).
HM Government (2015).b Antimicrobials and agriculture: Prime Ministers Office (2016). Speech: G7 2016 in Japan: PM reducing unnecessary use and waste. The Review on Press statement. 27 May 2016. (https://www.gov.uk/government/ Antimicrobial Resistance Chaired by Jim O’Neill. London: speeches/g7-2016-in-japan-pm-press-statement, accessed 12 June HM Government. (http://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/ 2018). Antimicrobials%20in%20agriculture%20and%20the%20 environment%20-%20Reducing%20unnecessary%20use%20 Public Health England (2015a). Health matters: antimicrobial and%20waste.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). resistance. London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov. uk/government/publications/health-matters-antimicrobial- HM Government (2016a). Tackling resistant infections resistance/health-matters-antimicrobial-resistance, accessed 12 globally: final report and recommendations. The Review on June 2018). Antimicrobial Resistance Chaired by Jim O’Neill. London: HM Government. (http://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_ Public Health England (2015b). Start smart – then focus: Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). Antimicrobial Stewardship Toolkit for English Hospitals. London: Public Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/ HM Government (2016b). Guidance: Handling of manure and government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ slurry to reduce antibiotic resistance. London: HM Government. file/417032/Start_Smart_Then_Focus_FINAL.PDF, accessed (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/handling-of-manure-and-slurry- 12 June 2018). to-reduce-antibiotic-resistance, accessed 12 June 2018). Public Health England (2016). Use of antibiotics decreases King’s Fund (2016). What if antibiotics were to stop working? across all healthcare settings for the first time. London: Public London: King’s Fund. (http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/reports/ Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/use-of- thenhsif/, accessed 12 June 2018). antibiotics-decreases-across-all-healthcare-settings-for-the-first- time, accessed 12 June 2018). Nathwani D, Sneddon J, Patton A, Malcolm W (2012). Antimicrobial stewardship in Scotland: impact of a national Public Health England (2017a). Health matters: preventing programme. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.1(1):7. doi: infections and reducing antimicrobial resistance. London: Public 10.1186/2047-2994-1-7. Health England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ health-matters-preventing-infections-and-reducing-amr/health- NHS England (2015a). Quality premium 2015/16: guidance for matters-preventing-infections-and-reducing-antimicrobial- CCGs. London: NHS England. (https://www.england.nhs.uk/ resistance, accessed 12 June 2018). wp-content/uploads/2013/12/qual-prem-guid.pdf, accessed 24 May 2016). Public Health England (2017b). English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance NHS England (2015b). Introduction to the proposed Antibiotic (ESPAUR) Report (2017). London: Public Health England. Prescribing Quality Premium. London: NHS England. (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ (https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/02- attachment_data/file/656611/ESPAUR_report_2017.pdf, amr-leeds-introduction-antimicrobial-prescribing-qp.pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). accessed 12 June 2018). England 35
RCN and IPS (2016). Infection prevention and control TATFAR (2011). TATFAR – first report. Recommendations commissioning toolkit: guidance and information for nursing for future cooperation between the US and EU. Stockholm: and commissioning staff in England. London: Royal College of ECDC. (http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/diseaseprogrammes/ Nursing and Infection Prevention Society. (https://www.rcn.org. TATFAR/Documents/210911_TATFAR_Report.pdf, accessed uk/professional-development/publications/pub-005375, accessed 24 May 2016). 12 June 2018). Veterinary Medicines Directorate (2017). UK-Veterinary Royal College of General Practitioners (2016). TARGET Antibiotic Resistance and Sales Surveillance Report 2016: Antibiotic Toolkit. London: Royal College of General Addlestone: Veterinary Medicines Directorate. (https://assets. Practitioners. (http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/ publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ toolkits/target-antibiotics-toolkit.aspx, accessed 12 June 2018).). attachment_data/file/655403/_1274590_VARSS_2016_report. PDF, accessed 12 June 2018). RUMA (2014). RUMA action plan implementing UK five year AMR strategy. London: Responsible Use of Medicines in Wellcome Trust (2015). Fleming Fund launched to tackle Agriculture Alliance. (http://www.ruma.org.uk/antimicrobials/ global problem of drug-resistant infection. London: Wellcome ruma-action-plan-implementing-uk-5-year-amr-strategy/, Trust. (http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/News/Media-office/Press- accessed 7 June 2018). releases/2015/WTP058933.htm, accessed 12 June 2018).
Scottish Government (2011). A revised framework for World Health Assembly (2013). Sixty-sixth World Health national surveillance of healthcare associated infection and Assembly: daily notes on proceedings, May 2013. Geneva: the introduction of a new health efficiency and access to World Health Organization. (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ treatment (HEAT) target for clostridium difficile associated events/2013/wha66/journal/en/index1.html, accessed 12 June disease (CDAD) for NHS Scotland. Edinburgh. The Scottish 2018). Government. (http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/mels/CEL2009_11. pdf, accessed 12 June 2018). 36 The role of public health organizations in addressing public health problems in Europe: Obesity, alcohol and antimicrobial resistance France
Obesity
Michel Chauliac, Laurent Chambaud, Cristina Hernández- Quevedo
The scale of the challenge
In France, the trends in improving health status, as According to this study, the prevalence of obesity and reflected by the increase in life expectancy and the overweight increases with age: in men, from 31.9% decrease in infant mortality, have not been equally among 18–29-year-olds to 72.8% among in people aged beneficial across socioeconomic groups, with the greatest 55–74 years, with a corresponding increase among women improvement being observed among the wealthiest. For from 22.8 to 57.7%. It is also linked to social position and example, life expectancy at 35 is seven years lower for occupation. Farmers and artisans are the most overweight working class men and three years lower for working class (70.3% of men and 44.4% women). The higher the women compared with managers (Danet, 2012). These level of education, the lower the prevalence of obesity inequalities also exist when morbidities or risk factors and overweight, even though in men the prevalence of such as obesity are examined. overweight does not decrease in those educated above college level (Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 2006). The significant burden of chronic diseases such as diabetes, exacerbated by an ageing population and the The latest national data, from 2013, based on measured increasing levels of obesity, have underscored the need weight and height in a national cohort of adults aged for ongoing monitoring and treatment. Preventive 30–69 years, showed a prevalence of overweight of strategies are also needed to reduce the incidence of these 41.0% in men and 25.3% in women and a prevalence of diseases. Since 2001, a National Nutrition and Health obesity of 15.8% in men and 15.6% in women (Matta et Plan (Programme national nutrition santé (PNNS)) has al., 2016). been implemented to improve the health of the entire French population by taking action on nutrition, along Self-reported data on weight and height also suggest an with other measures to improve the population’s health increasing trend of overweight and obesity. A cohort study (Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, 2011). on a nationally representative sample of the population in 1997 to 2012, conducted every 3 years found an increase Data on the prevalence of overweight and obesity, based in the prevalence of obesity in adults, from 8.5% in 1997 on measurements, suggest an increasing trend. The to 15% in 2012 (Fig. 1). The study also found that, the 2006–2007 National Survey on Nutrition and Health more severe obesity was, the more rapidly it increased: the (2006–2007 Etude nationale nutrition santé (ENNS)) was average yearly increase between these two dates was 1.4% based on weight and height measurements (Institut de for those overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30), 3.7% for those in Veille Sanitaire, 2006). This survey estimated that 32.4% obesity class I (30 ≤ BMI < 35), 7.8% for those in obesity of people aged 18–74 years were overweight (25 ≤ BMI class II (25 ≤ BMI < 30) and 10.3% for those in obesity < 30 kg/m2) and 16.9 % were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). class III (BMI >40) (Moisan et al., 2012). While the prevalence of obesity was very similar for men and women, the frequency of overweight is higher among men (41 % men vs. 23.8% women). France 37
Fig. 1 Prevalence of obesity in French adults, 1997–2012, in 2013, compared to 3.9% and 14.3% in 2000, based selected years on measured data (World Obesity Federation, 2017). This places France among the European countries where 20 overweight and obesity prevalence is lowest (World
14.5 15 Obesity Federation, 2017). However, social inequalities 15 13.1 are high, with an obesity prevalence of 1.3% in children 11.9 10.1 from upper class and 5.8% in children from working 10 Percent 8.5 class families (Chardon et al., 2015).
5 The official recommendation for physical activity is an equivalent of at least 30 minutes of quick walking at
0 least five days a week for adults (ANSES, 2016). This
1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 level of activity in only reached by 60% of French adults Source: Moisan et al. (2012) (Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 2006). Between 30% and The study found a widening gradient of obesity prevalence 50% of children spend more than three hours a day in according to monthly household income (Fig. 2). front of a screen, excluding screen time at school or for homework (Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 2006). Only 40% Fig. 2 Prevalence of adult obesity according to the monthly of the population reaches the recommended consumption household income, 1997, 2006 and 2012 level for fruits and vegetables. Social inequalities are also 30.0 ■ 1997 ■ 2006 ■ 2012 huge for this aspect, in both adults and children (ANSES, 2012). Social inequalities in nutrition are high for all indicators, including overweight and obesity in children 22.5 or adults and nutrient or food intake, for example, in terms of sugars, fruits and vegetables, fats and sugary
15.0 drinks (INSERM, 2014). Percent
7.5 Policies and programmes The National Health and Nutrition Programme (PNNS) was launched in 2001 and still running. Its objective is to 0.0 improve population health by acting on the nutritional <