MS 716 DAVID F. MYRICK PAPERS 1854-2002. 29.5 Linear Feet This
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness. -
Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars. -
A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2010 Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses Patrick W. Kidd University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Kidd, Patrick W., "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses" (2010). Theses (Historic Preservation). 144. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 Suggested Citation: Kidd, Patrick W. (2010) "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses Keywords Historic Preservation; Southwest, Railroad Disciplines Architecture | Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Suggested Citation: Kidd, Patrick W. (2010) "Branding the Southwest: A Preservation Plan for the Fred Harvey Houses." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/144 BRANDING THE SOUTHWEST: A PRESERVATION PLAN FOR THE FRED HARVEY HOUSES Patrick W. Kidd A Thesis in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2010 ____________________________ Advisor Dr. Aaron V. Wunsch, PhD Lecturer in Architectural History ____________________________ Program Chair Dr. Randall F. Mason, PhD Associate Professor This work is dedicated to all those who strive to preserve and promote our rich rail heritage and to make it available to future generations. -
Trains 2019 Index
INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov -
Lower Eel River Total Maximum Daily Loads For· Temperature and Sediment
., U.s. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Lower Eel River Total Maximum Daily Loads for· Temperature and Sediment Approved by: l~ltl(Jl Alexis Strauss, Date Director, Water Division TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 1.1. OVERVIEW OF THE TMDL PROGRAM ................................................................... 1 1.2. WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................... 2 1.3. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CONSULTATION.................................................... 4 1.4. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2: PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................. 7 2.1. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS............................................................................... 7 2.2. FISH POPULATION AND ENDANGERED SPECIES CONCERNS......................... 9 2.3. STREAM TEMPERATURE PROBLEMS .................................................................. 14 2.4. SEDIMENT PROBLEMS ............................................................................................ 26 CHAPTER 3: TEMPERATURE TMDLS ............................................................................... 30 3.1. INTERPRETING THE EXISTING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR TEMPERATURE ........................................................................................................ -
Surviving Nevada Railroad Stations
Surviving Nevada Railroad Stations Boulder City: The passenger station originally built by the Union Pacific here still stands, home of the Southern Nevada Museum. Caliente: The passenger station originally built by the Union Pacific Railroad here still stands. Carson City: The passenger stations originally built by the Virginia & Truckee Railroad and Nevada Copper Belt Railroad/Southern Pacific here still stand. Cherry Creek: The passenger station originally built by the Nevada Northern Railway here still stands, home of the White Pine Public Museum, moved to Ely. Currie: The passenger station originally built by the Nevada Northern Railway here still stands. Dayton: The passenger station originally built by the Southern Pacific Railroad here still stands. East Ely: The passenger and freight stations originally built by the Nevada Northern Railway here still stand, home of the East Ely Depot Railroad Museum. Elko: The passenger station originally built by the Western Pacific Railroad here still stands. Also, the freight depots built by the SP and WP here still stand. Ely: The passenger station originally built by the Nevada Northern Railway here still stands. Eureka: The passenger station originally built by the Eureka & Palisade Railroad here still stands, privately owned. Fallon: The passenger station originally built by the Southern Pacific Railroad here still stands, used as a business. Fernley: The passenger station originally built by the Southern Pacific Railroad here still stands. Gerlach: The passenger station originally built by the Western Pacific Railroad here still stands, owned by UP. Goldfield: The passenger station originally built by the Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad here still stands, used as a business. -
Sterling-Connection-Grand-Canyon.Pdf
April 25-30, 2016 Allied's Extra Touch DAY 1 l Amtrak Overnight to Williams, accommodations are at the Maswik • Allied’s Exclusive Train/Air AZ Lodge in the Grand Canyon National Experience An exciting adventure awaits when you Park Village. Overnight Grand Can- • Spend Quality Time at the Grand transfer to Kansas City to board Amtrak’s yon, AZ Canyon Southwest Chief for a journey through the • On the Rim and Below the Rim heart of the Southwest. Sleep in your own DAY 4 l Day at Leisure/Grand Canyon Excursions private compartment as you make your Railway Back to Williams (D) • Dome Seating on the Grand way across the Plains. Overnight Am- Wake up at your leisure as you’ll have Canyon Railway trak. most of the day to explore the Grand • Our Quality Meals Make the Canyon at your pace. See everything Difference! DAY 2 l Amtrak Across Southern CO/ that you want to see at one of the • Private Compartment on Amtrak Northern New Mexico/Arrive Williams, world’s most colossal Canyons. Take in • All meals in the Diner on Amtrak AZ (B, L, D) a Ranger talk at the Visitor’s Center, • 9 Meals: 3 Breakfasts (B), 3 It’s daylight when you arrive in eastern discover Grand Canyon Village, and Lunches (L), 3 Dinners (D) Colorado. Wake up to enjoy breakfast on much more. It’s so large it defies de- the train in the diner, just like the old days. scription, and we’ll give you as much • Tour Director - Loretta Mills Then sit back and relax as the beautiful time as you need to see it all. -
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company
BA# 2738 B.C.D. 01-74 SEP 2 0 2001 EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued status of San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company (SD&AE) (BA No. 2738) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.) The SD&AE was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company until November 1, 1979, when the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) purchased the stock of SD&AE, becoming the sole owner thereof. The property was acquired for use in connection with a public transit system. To conduct the freight operations of the SD&AE, MTDB contracted with Kyle Railways, Inc. (Kyle) (BA No. 9003), which in turn created a subsidiary for freight operation purposes, namely, the San Diego & Arizona Eastern Transportation Company (BA No. 2751). In 1984, MTDB sought a new operator.1 In Finance Docket No. 30457, decided August 9, 1984, the ICC authorized San Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad (SD&IV) (BA No. 3758) to conduct railroad operations over the line.2 In a footnote to a subsequent decision, the ICC noted that SD&AE, as owner of the line, holds the residual common carrier obligation to provide rail service on the line. (See ICC Finance Docket 30457, decided September 20, 1985, footnote 8). In its decision regarding the employer status of Railroad Ventures, Inc. (B.C.D. -
Project Name
COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation March 25, 2021 WILLIAMS CREEK RESTORATION PLAN Project No. 11-025-05 Project Manager: Michael Bowen RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $307,170 to the Humboldt County Resource Conservation District to conduct studies and prepare designs, permit applications, and a management plan for restoration of the Williams Creek watershed near Ferndale, Humboldt County, CA. LOCATION: Williams Creek watershed near Ferndale, Humboldt County, CA. EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location Map Exhibit 2: Project Photos Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution and findings. Resolution: The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes disbursement of an amount not to exceed three hundred seven thousand one hundred seventy dollars ($307,170) to the Humboldt County Resource Conservation District (“the grantee”) to conduct studies and prepare designs, permit applications, and a management plan for the enhancement of the Williams Creek watershed near Ferndale, CA. Prior to commencement of the project, the grantee shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy (Executive Officer) the following: 1. A detailed work program, schedule, and budget. 2. Names and qualifications of any contractors to be retained in carrying out the project. 3. A plan for acknowledgement of Conservancy funding and Proposition 1 as the source of that funding. Page 1 of 9 WILLIAMS CREEK RESTORATION PLAN Findings: Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: 1. The proposed authorization is consistent with Chapter 5.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, regarding integrated coastal and marine resources protection. -
Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Eureka Area Humboldt County, California
Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Eureka Area Humboldt County, California By R, E. EVENSON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1470 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. S EATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U. S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Evenson, Robert Edward, 1924- Geology and ground-water features of the Eureka area, Humboldt County, California. Prepared in cooperation with the California Dept. of Water Eesources. Washing ton, U. S. Govt. Print. Off., 1959 iv, 80 p. maps, diagrs., tables. 25 cm. (U. S. Geological Survey Water-supply paper 1470) Part of illustrative matter fold. col. in pocket. Bibliography: p. 77. 1. Water-supply California Humboldt Co. 2. Water, Under ground California Humboldt Co. i. Title: Eureka area, Hum boldt County, California. (Series) TC801.U2 no. 1470 551.490979412 GS 59-169 copy 2. GB1025.C2E9 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract___-_____-__--_--_-_-_________-__--_--_-_-______ ___ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of the work________ _________________________ 2 Location and extent of the area_______________-_-__-__--________ 3 Previous work_______________________________________________ 3 Well-numbering system________________________________________ -
California Rail Plan
HE 2771 .C2 C42 2001/02 2001 -02 to 2010-11 LIBRARY COPY CALIF. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY 1120 N STREET, SACRAMENTO March 2002 California Department of Transportation GRAY DAVIS, Governor MARIA CONTRERAS SWEET, Secretary . Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ;_ --~--.-JEFF MORALES;~reaor · :--. j'·California'be': ·n~emofT iarlooifaoon rlil \ r ~TE OP CALJ1:QRWA-BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HQUSlNG AGENCY GRAY DAVIS Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR ~ 1120 N STREET ~ P. 0 . BOX 942873 Flex your power! SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 Be energy effic1enU PHONE (916) 654-5267 FAX (916) 654-6608 ITY (916) 654-4086 March 1, 2002 Members, California LegisJature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Members: I am pleased to submit to you the California Department of Transportation's (Department) California State Rail Plan 2001-02 to 2010-11. The Department has prepared the Plaa as an examination of intercity passenger rail and freight rail transportation in California, in accordance with Section 14036 of the Government Code. The passenger element of the Plan reviews the current operations of the three State-supported intercity rail passenger routes (Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol), and outlines ten-year plans for capital improvements and service expansions. This element aJso addresses the Depanment's vision for intercity rail and its standards for achievement of ten-year goals, and discusses potential new routes including high-speed rail. ~ The freight element of the Plan is an overview of the State freight rail system, looking at commodities and volumes of goods moving in and out of the State. This element aJso looks at freight issues like capacity concerns, intermoda] traffic, passenger and freight trains sharing right of way, short line railroad issues, funding programs, environmental issues, new technology, and future needs and objectives. -
Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14