DOCSLIB.ORG

Casinos Briefing Note:Competv1.Qxd.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Casinos Briefing Note:Competv1.Qxd.Qxd centreforcities casinos and regeneration the story so far Ben Harrison Summary On 30 January 2007 the Independent Casino Advisory Panel announced that the city of Manchester would host the UK’s first supercasino. The city came from behind to beat the frontrunners, Blackpool and Greenwich. This note deconstructs the decision, before critically assessing the relationship between casinos and regeneration more generally. It focuses on the regeneration issues around supercasino development. It concludes with some lessons for Manchester. Key points: February 2007 • The 2005 Gambling Act modernises the UK’s gambling laws. It provides new reg- ulations for internet gambling, and allows for a new generation of big casinos across the UK – for one supercasino, eight large, and eight small casinos. • Cities and central government are interested in the potential for ‘casino-led urban regeneration’. This was a major factor in all of the supercasino bids. • The evidence on casino-led urban regeneration is relatively thin. It is a new and relatively untested approach for the UK. The Manchester supercasino is effective- ly a pilot. • Overall, big casinos appear to be a mixed blessing. Cities must guard against over-promising on what can be delivered, and be prepared for the potential downsides. • Upsides include the potential for casinos to create jobs and to boost tourism and existing leisure sectors. There may also be image benefits for the city, and multi- plier effects on the wider local economy. • Downsides include increased problem gambling, mixed employment effects, dis- placement of existing businesses and spending, and damage to a city’s image. • There remains a real risk that the potential downsides might outweigh the upsides of the new supercasino. • Manchester must be realistic about the potential costs and benefits of the super- casino, and quickly begin a clear forward strategy outlining how it will link local people to the new jobs, provide advice to local businesses, and take steps to limit gambling addiction. It should also push ahead with plans to take a cut of casino revenues – which can be recycled into the local economy. briefing paper no. 1 briefing paper no. 1: February 2007 www.ippr.org/centreforcities 1 1. Background to the Gambling Act Legal gambling has existed in the UK for some time (see Box 1). The 2005 Gambling Act sig- nificantly changes the rules. This section summarises the new legislation. Box 1. A brief history of legal gambling in the UK 1961: The ‘Betting and Gaming Act’ provides a legal basis for off-course betting and casinos 1968: The ‘Gaming Act’ – restricted the hours casinos could open, limited the number of slot machines they could have, as well as limiting possible jackpots. 1970: All gaming, including bingo and gaming machines, becomes subject to licence and is placed under the control of the Home Office. 2005: The ‘Gambling Act’ is passed and will come into effect fully in September 2007. This Act relaxes gambling regulations significantly. "The super- The Gambling Act comprehensively modernises the law on gambling. First, it introduces a pow- casino will be erful regulator for gambling – the Gambling Commission – which will assume the responsibili- ties of the Gaming Board in respect of casinos, bingo, gaming machines and lotteries. Second, huge, with a the Act gives responsibility for the licensing of gambling premises to local authorities. customer area Third, gaming law now covers online gambling. Rather than outlaw online gambling, the of 5,000m sq – Government has stated that the UK should seek to provide a global standard for good internet gambling regulation, protecting those who gamble online and establishing a strict social respon- about the size sibility code of practice for UK based operators. of a football Finally, the Act allows for three new types of casinos to operate in Britain; the super casino (or pitch." regional casino), large casino and small casino. One supercasino will be permitted, along with eight large and eight small casinos. The Government’s stated objectives in initiating this new legislation are threefold: • To prevent gambling from being a source of crime or disorder • To ensure that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way • To protect children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gam- bling (Gambling Act 2005) Popular and policy attention focused on one element of the Act – the new casinos, and specifi- cally, the supercasino. There are already 117 casinos across the country, but there are several rea- sons why the supercasino in particular merits our attention. First, it will be huge, with a minimum total customer area of 5,000 m² - about the size of a football pitch. Second, it will be permitted to house up to 1,250 unlimited jackpot gaming machines. These machines are big revenue-makers for casinos, but also considered among the most addictive (Griffiths 2007). Third, the supercasino will also have hotels, conference facilities, restaurants, bars and areas for live entertainment. It will become a landmark feature of Manchester – and in other cities if more supercasinos are permitted in the future. The other new casinos are a great deal smaller, but still significant. Large casinos will have a minimum total customer area of 1,500 m², while small casinos will have a minimum total cus- tomer area of 750m², and be permitted up to 80 Category B gaming machines, with a maximum jackpot of £4,000. The one regional and eight large casinos will be permitted to offer bingo, and all three cate- gories will be permitted to offer betting. briefing paper no. 1: February 2007 www.ippr.org/centreforcities 2 2) Implementing the Act: the Casino Advisory Panel The Government set up an independent Casino Advisory Panel (CAP) to decide the locations of the 17 new casinos across the UK. The Panel was led by Professor Stephen Crow, who was appointed by the Secretary of State following an open competition. Professor Crow is an eminent practitioner of Statutory Planning, having held one of its highest offices in Britain as Chief Planning Inspector (1988-1994) and Chief Executive (1992-1994) at the Planning Inspectorate. The other members of the panel were Christopher Collison, James Froomberg, Neil Mundy and Deep Sagar. There was a theme of regeneration and planning experience among board members. The Panel reported back to Ministers on 30 January. The government now needs to gain Parliamentary approval to grant licenses for the host cities. Cities will then invite bids from operators and developers to build and run the casinos. "The super- 3) The supercasino casino must The most prominent – and controversial – element of the Government’s approach is the creation address a of a supercasino. Originally, eight of these were planned, but in the face of widespread protest need for the Government decided to go ahead with just one. regeneration." The cities that applied for supercasino licenses but were knocked out were Leeds, Southampton, Chesterfield, Coventry, Dartford, Dudley, Great Yarmouth, Havering, Hull, Ipswich, Middlesbrough, Midlothian, Newport, Solihull (NEC Site), Southend-on-Sea, Sunderland, Thurrock, Wakefield, West Dunbartonshire. A shortlist of eight was decided. Brent dropped out after this, leaving seven runners: • Greenwich / Millennium Dome • Cardiff • Blackpool • Glasgow • Manchester •Newcastle • Sheffield. The CAP stated that to be successful any bid must fulfil the following criteria: • consider the social impact of the new supercasino • have a need for urban regeneration • possess a genuine willingness to license • guarantee a high probability of implementation • boast broad regional support • target specific community benefits • offer a suitable number and range of potential sites for the casino. Importantly, the supercasino must address a need for regeneration in the chosen area, and the winning city must take into account the new casino’s social impact and ensure that it is not harmful. This meant that the winning area was likely to have high levels of unemployment and social deprivation, and the CAP was concerned that people living close to some of the proposed sites may have a high vulnerability to gambling addiction. briefing paper no. 1: February 2007 www.ippr.org/centreforcities 3 “Greenwich 4) The decision: winners and losers ranked number In September 2006 the CAP released its initial scoring of bids for the supercasino. Top scorers one when the were Greenwich, Glasgow and Blackpool. Greenwich ranked number one when the initial short- initial shortlist list of seven was drawn up, a full ten points ahead of the eventual winner – Manchester. was drawn up In the months that followed, Blackpool and Greenwich came to be considered the two fron- trunners for the supercasino. Blackpool bolstered its case with a nationwide poll, suggesting it – a full ten was the popular choice – even among Londoners.1 points ahead of So it was to widespread surprise that on 30 January 2007 the Independent Casino Advisory Manchester” Panel announced that Manchester would host the UK’s first supercasino. Manchester The Manchester bid contended that the casino development would attract 1.3m new visitors to the city and create a total of over 1,000 net new jobs for the city of Manchester (CPC 2006). The bid focused on the city’s proven track record of delivering successful regeneration pro- grammes. It stressed the significant experience of Manchester City Council through several major urban renewal and social development projects over the past two
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
    HOUSE OF LORDS Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee 13th Report of Session 2006-07 Drawing special attention to: Draft Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007 Volume I: Report and oral evidence (Written evidence published separately as HL Paper 67–II) Ordered to be printed 13 March and published 20 March 2007 London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 67–I The Select Committee on the Merits of Statutory Instruments The Committee has the following terms of reference: (1) The Committee shall, subject to the exceptions in paragraph (2), consider— (a) every instrument (whether or not a statutory instrument), or draft of an instrument, which is laid before each House of Parliament and upon which proceedings may be, or might have been, taken in either House of Parliament under an Act of Parliament; (b) every proposal which is in the form of a draft of such an instrument and is laid before each House of Parliament under an Act of Parliament, with a view to determining whether or not the special attention of the House should be drawn to it on any of the grounds specified in paragraph (3). (2) The exceptions are— (a) Orders in Council, and draft Orders in Council, under paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the Northern Ireland Act 2000; (b) remedial orders, and draft remedial orders, under section 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998; (c) draft orders (including draft subordinate provisions orders) under section 1 of the Regulatory Reform Act 2001, subordinate provisions orders under that Act and proposals in the form of a draft order under that Act; (d) Measures under the Church of England Assembly (Powers) Act 1919 and instruments made, and drafts of instruments to be made, under them.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Report Examination in Public Regional Spatial Strategy for The
    Regional Spatial Strategy for the North East Examination in Public March – April 2006 Panel Report July 2006 Regional Spatial Strategy for the North East Examination in Public March – April 2006 Report of the Panel July 2006 REGIONAL SPATIAL STRATEGY CONTENTS FOR THE NORTH EAST Contents CHAPTER Page PREFACE i 1 PANEL OVERVIEW AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 RSS VISION AND STRATEGY 13 3 SPATIAL STRATEGY 19 4 CITY REGIONS AND THE RURAL AREAS 27 5 ECONOMY 55 6 URBAN AND RURAL CENTRES & THE METRO CENTRE 73 7 HOUSING 79 8 THE ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 97 9 TRANSPORT STRATEGY 119 10 MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTATION 133 APPENDIX A TIMETABLE, MATTERS and PARTICIPANTS A1 APPENDIX B EXAMINATION LIBRARY DOCUMENTS B1 APPENDIX C RECOMMENDED RSS POLICY CHANGES i) INDEX TO THE SUBMISSION DRAFT POLICIES, THE PANEL’S MODIFICATIONS TO POLICIES AND NEW C1 POLICIES ii) POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF POPULATION C4 PROJECTIONS iii) NEW STUDIES - CITY REGION HOUSING MARKET C5 AREAS iv) PANEL’S MODIFICATIONS TO POLICIES AND NEW C7 POLICIES APPENDIX D SUMMARY of PANEL RECOMMENDATIONS D1 APPENDIX E GLOSSARY E1 PANEL REPORT REGIONAL SPATIAL STRATEGY FOR THE NORTH EAST PANEL REPORT REGIONAL SPATIAL STRATEGY PREFACE FOR THE NORTH EAST Preface i. The Regional Spatial Strategy for the North East Submission Draft (June 2005) covers the period to 2021 and is intended to replace the existing Regional Planning Guidance for the North East. Throughout this Report ‘the Submission Draft’ has been used to refer to the Submission Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the North East (June 2005) and ‘the RSS’ to refer to the final Regional Spatial Strategy and its successors.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gaming UK: How Prepared Is Manchester (UK) for Vegas-Style Supercasinos?”
    “Gaming UK: How prepared is Manchester (UK) for Vegas-style supercasinos?” AUTHORS Nnamdi O. Madichie ARTICLE INFO Nnamdi O. Madichie (2007). Gaming UK: How prepared is Manchester (UK) for Vegas-style supercasinos?. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(3-1) RELEASED ON Friday, 05 October 2007 JOURNAL "Problems and Perspectives in Management" FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Problems and Perspectives in Management / Volume 5, Issue 3, 2007 (continued) Gaming UK: How Prepared is Manchester (UK) for Vegas-Style Supercasinos? Nnamdi O. Madichie* Abstract Casinos provide a remedy for desperately declining cities, and the case of Atlantic City, New Jersey provides one critical illustration of this. It was the only state other than Nevada to have legalized ca- sino gambling in the late 1970s when the state looked to the casino hotel industry to invest capital, create jobs, pay taxes, and attract tourists and thus revitalise the economy as well as create a sound financial environment for urban redevelopment. It has also notably been linked with making cities vibrant places to visit and as an opportunity to become world class cities. Cities in Austria and Aus- tralia (including Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, and Sydney) have also towed a similar line and watched as their respective cities have been regenerated – thus making the supercasinos a contender for unparalleled economic engine – given the proper timing and market location. However this new wave of the entrepreneurial state, in its attempts to reimage the city through such measures as casi- nos, seems to have lessened the degree of public participation in the planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Casinos and Regeneration: the Story So Far
    CASINOS AND REGENERATION: THE STORY SO FAR C4C BRIEFING NOTE Ben Harrison 15 February 2007 On 30 January 2007 the Independent Casino Advisory Panel announced that the city of Manchester would host the UK’s first supercasino. The city came from behind to beat the frontrunners, Blackpool and Greenwich. This note deconstructs the decision, before critically assessing the relationship between casinos and regeneration more generally. It focuses on the regeneration issues around supercasino development. It concludes with some lessons for Manchester. Key points: • The 2005 Gambling Act modernises the UK’s gambling laws. It provides new regulations for internet gambling, and allows for a new generation of big casinos across the UK: for one supercasino, eight large, and eight small casinos. • Cities and central government are interested in the potential for ‘casino-led urban regeneration’. This was a major factor in all of the supercasino bids. • The evidence on casino-led urban regeneration is relatively thin. It is a new and relatively untested approach for the UK. The Manchester supercasino is effectively a pilot. • Overall, big casinos appear to be a mixed blessing. Cities must guard against over- promising on what can be delivered, and be prepared for the potential downsides. • Upsides include the potential for casinos to create jobs and to boost tourism and existing leisure sectors. There may also be image benefits for the city, and multiplier effects on the wider local economy. • Downsides include increased problem gambling, mixed employment effects, displacement of existing businesses and spending, and damage to a city’s image. • There remains a real risk that the potential downsides might outweigh the upsides of the new supercasino.
    [Show full text]
  • AMB3046 Gambling Hbook 2010
    Gambling Act 2005 Councillors’ Handbook (England and Wales) Gambling Act 2005. England and Wales: Councillors’ Handbook Foreword Gambling is an increasingly acceptable Between us we have already made strides into leisure activity in modern Britain and a an effective system of co-regulation, and we wide range of gambling premises are a look forward to continuing to build common sight on most high streets, relationships with officials and councillors to seafronts and other entertainment ensure that we can, between us, keep gambling destinations. fair and safe for all. Since 2007 councils in England and Wales (as Brian Pomeroy, well as in Scotland) have taken on new statutory Chair, Gambling Commission duties as licensing authorities under the Gambling Act 2005. Councillors play a pivotal role in ensuring the Gambling businesses have a role in many effective implementation of the Gambling Act at communities across the UK - including a local level, whether as members of the seaside arcades, bingo clubs or licensing authority, or more generally in their bookmakers, where many try their luck roles as ward councillors within local on major sporting events like the Grand communities. National. These businesses are a source of local entertainment and provide This informative handbook includes practical employment and economic activity which case studies demonstrating how councils are help support other local businesses. using the legislation to support safer, healthier communities in which people and businesses No one wants to have establishments that put thrive. We hope you find it useful. vulnerable adults and children at risk or are a source of crime and disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive 23 August 2006 Report from the Director of Policy And
    ITEM NO: 13 Executive 23rd August 2006 Report from the Director of Policy and Regeneration For Action Wards Affected: ALL Wembley Regeneration and the Casino Advisory Panel Forward Plan Ref: PRU-06/07-001 1.0 Summary 1.1 This report updates members of the Executive on progress relating to the potential for Brent to host a regional casino. It sets out developments since the last executive report, in March 2006, restates the findings of the independent economic and social impact assessments of a potential regional style casino at Wembley that were commissioned prior to this date, and summarises the results of the recent public consultation process. It asks members of the Executive to consider whether to continue to support a regional casino in the Borough. 1.2 If members continue to support a regional casino at this stage, it in no way commits the authority to hosting a casino. Rather it provides Brent with the opportunity to license such a facility. Throughout the Casino Advisory Panel process the Council will be able to articulate the terms on which it would be prepared to pursue the concept further, and subsequently if Brent is recommended by the Casino Advisory Panel as a preferred location then the Council would retain regulatory powers through both planning and licensing controls. No specific site has been identified and no preferred operators or developers have been chosen. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 That in the light of the findings of the Economic and Social Impact assessments and the recent public consultation exercise, the Executive Meeting Version no.
    [Show full text]
  • International Sports Village
    CARDIFF COUNCIL CYNGOR CAERDYDD EXECUTIVE BUSINESS MEETING: 17 APRIL 2007 INTERNATIONAL SPORTS VILLAGE REPORT OF CORPORATE DIRECTOR AGENDA ITEM: 4 PORTFOLIO: CORPORATE Reason for this Report 1. This report is to seek the Executive’s approval of a competitive tender exercise in relation to disposal of the remaining part of the Sports Village retail site and to report recent progress at the site. Background 2. Phase 1 of the Sports Village development has been completed. The road infrastructure and utilities works are complete, and Morrisons and Toys R Us are trading. 50% of the receipt for the residential site has been received, with the balance due in April 2007, and the 50 metre pool is due for completion at the beginning of January 2008. Practical Completion for the temporary ice rink was achieved on 8 March 2007 and the temporary rink is fully operational, some snagging work to the temporary rink remains to be completed including repainting of the external walls which requires a period of continuous of dry weather. 3. Financial appraisals and construction programmes are being updated for Phase 2 of the development which includes the multi purpose arena, snow box, hotel, parking infrastructure and the Olympic standard canoe centre. Discussions have commenced between the Council and a potential operator in respect of the proposed new multi purpose Arena at the Sports Village. 4. Cardiff was contacted and asked to submit evidence by the Merits Committee of the House of Lords in respect of the debate in both Houses of Parliament concerning the Regional Casino, and a copy of Cardiff’s “Call for Evidence” submission to the House of Lords is attached as Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/research/westminsterresearch Gambling with regeneration: seaside resort regeneration and casino development James Morgan School of Architecture and the Built Environment This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © The Author, 2013. This is an exact reproduction of the paper copy held by the University of Westminster library. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Users are permitted to download and/or print one copy for non-commercial private study or research. Further distribution and any use of material from within this archive for profit-making enterprises or for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: (http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] GAMBLING WITH REGENERATION: SEASIDE RESORT REGENERATION AND CASINO DEVELOPMENT JAMES MORGAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For his patience, invaluable advice and constant supervision, Professor Peter Newman my Director of Studies has my greatest admiration and thanks. My supervisors, Professor Robert Maitland and Dr Adam Eldridge, who constantly offered their expertise, advice and time, are in my debt. My thanks also go to Brett Crane who has supported me throughout the whole process of researching and writing up my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank/Gala Appendices and Glossary
    APPENDIX A Terms of reference and conduct of the inquiry Terms of reference 1. On 20 August 2012, the OFT sent the following reference to the CC: 1. In exercise of its duty under section 33(1) of the Enterprise Act (‘the Act’) to make a reference to the Competition Commission (‘the CC’) in relation to an anticipated merger, the Office of Fair Trading, (‘the OFT’) believes that it is or may be the case that: (a) arrangements are in progress or contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a relevant merger situation in that: i. enterprises carried on by or under the control of the Rank Group PLC will cease to be distinct from enterprises carried on by or under the control of Gala Casinos Limited; and ii. the value of turnover in the UK of the enterprises acquired exceeds £70 million; and (b) the creation of that situation may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition within any market or markets in the UK for goods or services, including the supply of casino services (i) at a national level in the UK, and (ii) at a local level in the areas of Stockton-on-Tees, Aberdeen, Bristol, Cardiff, Stockport/Didsbury, Liverpool/New Brighton, Leeds, Edinburgh and Bradford. 2. Therefore, in exercise of its duty under section 33(1) of the Act, the OFT hereby refers to the CC, for investigation and report within a period ending on 3 February 2013, on the following questions in accordance with section 36(1) of the Act: (a) whether a relevant merger situation will be created; and (b) if so, whether the creation of that situation may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition within any market or markets in the UK for goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Costs and Benefits of Gambling in the United Kingdom?
    WHAT ARE THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF GAMBLING IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? Yuliya Crane 1. Setting the Scene For a long time, the United Kingdom government considered replacing a very old and out of date Gambling Act, which dates back to 1968. Following the example of Australia where the Productivity Commission produced a substantial Gaming Report in 1999, analysing the present state of the industry, its externalities and future trends, the Department of Culture, Media and Sport commissioned a gambling review study, chaired by Sir Alan Budd in 2001. This report confirmed that the existing regulation was out of date and needed reviewing. The report suggested a considerable relaxation of laws governing the operations of casino gaming. The cross-industry group for gambling deregulation predicted that the number of Britons visiting a casino in any one year would have jumped from 3 per cent to 10 per cent (Ahmed and Mathiason, 2003) if the Budd proposals were implemented. The Department of Culture, Media and Sport published a response to Budd’s study, accepting the vast majority of its proposals. However, after a draft bill became public, there was a large wave of protests from anti-gambling organisa- tions. As a result, subsequent drafts of the bill proposed less and less change. The Draft Gambling Bill originally called for more than forty super-casinos, or as many as the market would bear, but that number was dropped to twenty during negotiations between Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, and the Labour Party in 2004 and then lowered to eight in February 2005 (Smith, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Against the Odds…? Information About the Gambling Act 2005 and Problem Gambling
    Against the odds…? Information about the Gambling Act 2005 and problem gambling Contents 1. Gambling – The Facts Description. Problem gambling. Statistics. 2. Gambling Policy Government Policy. Internet gambling. Advertising. Casinos. Licensing Authorities. The Gambling Act. The Gambling Commission. 3. Industry Response Gambling Research, Education and Treatment Foundation. Responsible Gambling Strategy Board. Responsible Gambling Fund. Other Industry Involvement. 4. Types of Gambling Raffles / Tombolas. The National Lottery. Other Lotteries. Premium Bonds. Pools. Bingo. Betting on racing and sporting events. TV Shows. Gaming in Pubs and Clubs. Equal Chance Tournaments. Casinos. Gaming Machines. Fixed Odds Betting Terminals. Remote betting and gaming. Spread Betting. 5. Christian Reflections on Gambling and Problem Gambling 6. Christian Organisations’ Policies on Gambling Statements and policies. Rules on fundraising. Sources of further information. 7. Who else is involved? GamCare. Gordon House Association. Support groups. Regulators. Local authorities. Researchers. Campaigners. 8. What Can You Do? Personal conduct. Education. Licensing. Advertising. Support local treatment services. Become a counsellor. Get gambling on the political agenda. Pray. For some people, occasional gambling may be a part of their normal social activity. However, whilst many people enjoy a flutter or a bet from time to time, gambling can become addictive and cause many problems. Problem gambling impacts on the individual, their friends, family and colleagues, and on society. Financial pressures can build on people who have problems with their gambling so they are forced to borrow or steal more and more money. The ‘normalisation’ of gambling through public acceptance of the National Lottery and the increase in opportunities to gamble, especially through the internet, means that more and more people are likely to come into contact with gambling, and problem gambling.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Casino
    MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR RESOLUTION REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE DATE 26th JULY 2006 SUBJECT REGIONAL CASINO REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE PURPOSE OF REPORT To update the Executive on the City Council’s submission to the Government’s independent Casino Advisory Panel for the ability to licence a regional casino. RECOMMENDATIONS The Executive is recommended to: 1. Note the contents of this report and welcome the Panel’s decision to shortlist Manchester’s bid as one of eight shortlisted locations for a single pilot regional casino. 2. Delegate to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Chair of the Executive and the Executive Member for Planning and the Environment, to agree the City Council’s next stage submission to the Government’s Independent Advisory Panel on Casinos. 3. Approve the approach for developing a social responsibility framework for casinos and other forms of gambling for report back to the Executive with detailed proposals later in the year. 4. Note that there is a report to the Executive elsewhere on this agenda on the implications of the Gambling Act 2005 for the City Council as licensing authority. FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE REVENUE BUDGET None from this report FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE CAPITAL BUDGET None from this report.. CONTACT OFFICERS Howard Bernstein Chief Executive 234 3006 [email protected] Tom Russell Chief Executive, New East Manchester 223 1155 [email protected] Jane Deane Project Director, New East Manchester 223 1155 [email protected] Ian McCormack New East Manchester 223 1155 [email protected] BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS 1.
    [Show full text]