Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary Harlow District Council – England Date April 2010 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Harlow District Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management Date April 2010 . Progress Report i Date April 2010 Harlow District Council - England Local Ron Taylor Authority Officer Department Environmental Health Services Address Harlow Council Civic Centre The Water Gardens Harlow CM20 1WG Telephone 01279 446164 e-mail [email protected] Report HAR/PR2010 Reference Final Copy 01/Mar31 number Date 31st March 2010 Report written by: Paul Hinsley Environment, Strategy and Highways Essex County Council County Hall Chelmsford Essex CM1 1QH On behalf of the : Essex Air Quality Consortium Monitoring Network. ii Progress Report Harlow District Council – England Date April 2010 Executive Summary The monitoring undertaken confirms that the annual mean nitrogen dioxide and PM10 objectives have not been exceeded. There have been no other significant changes to NO2 or PM10 concentrations or emissions elsewhere in the District since the previous round of Review and Assessment. The assessment of likely impacts of local developments for road transport, other transport, industrial processes, commercial/domestic, fugitive emissions, residential and commercial sources indicate that there are no new changes that require the Council to undertake a Detailed Assessment. Progress Report iii Date April 2010 Harlow District Council - England Table of contents 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area 6 1.2 Purpose of Progress Report 6 1.3 Air Quality Objectives 6 1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments 8 2 New Monitoring Data 9 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken 9 2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with Air Quality Objectives 14 3 New Local Developments 16 4 Planning Applications 17 5 Local Transport Plans and Strategies 18 6 Conclusions and Proposed Actions 19 6.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data 19 6.2 Proposed Actions 19 7 References 20 iv Progress Report Harlow District Council – England Date April 2010 Appendices Appendix 1 QA:QC data Appendix 2 Harlow District Council Monitoring Data 2009 Appendix 3 Harlow District Council Processes 2009 List of Tables Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of Local Air Quality Management in England. Table 2.1 Details of Non- Automatic Monitoring Sites Table 2.2 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes List of Figures Figure 2.1a – c Maps of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites Progress Report v Date April 2010 Harlow District Council - England 1 Introduction 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area The District of Harlow is located in west of Essex. It is a “new” town and the area forms part of the London commuter belt. The total area covered by the Council is just over 30km2, with a population of approximately 78,000. The main employment in the area is service related, although there is some industry, mainly located at Templefields to the north and the Pinnacles to the northwest. The town has two railway stations (on the West Anglia main line) and is near the M11 motorway for access to London and the rest of the country. Harlow also has one of the most extensive cycle track networks in the country, connecting the town centre and industrial areas. The town centre and many of its neighbourhood shopping facilities have, in recent years, undergone major redevelopment, and many of the original town buildings and industrial units have been rebuilt. There are around 30 minor industrial processes that are regulated by the Council and five larger industrial processes regulated by the Environment Agency in the Council‟s area. Most of which are located in the two main industrial areas in the town, Templefields (to the North), and the Pinnacles (to the Northwest). Traffic emissions are the most significant source of air pollution in Harlow. The main roads in the District are the M11 and the A414. 1.2 Purpose of Progress Report Progress Reports are required in the intervening years between the three-yearly Updating and Screening Assessment reports. Their purpose is to maintain continuity in the Local Air Quality Management process. They are not intended to be as detailed as Updating and Screening Assessment Reports, or to require as much effort. However, if the Progress Report identifies the risk of exceedence of an Air Quality Objective, the Local Authority (LA) should undertake a Detailed Assessment immediately, and not wait until the next round of Review and Assessment. 1.3 Air Quality Objectives The air quality objectives applicable to Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) in England are set out in the Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 (SI 928), and the Air Quality (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 3043). They are shown in Table 1.1. This table shows the objectives in units of microgrammes per cubic metre g/m3 (for carbon monoxide the units used are milligrammes per cubic metre, mg/m3). Table 1.1. includes the number of permitted exceedences in any given year (where applicable). 6 Progress Report Harlow District Council – England Date April 2010 Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of Local Air Quality Management in England. Pollutant Date to be Concentration Measured as achieved by Benzene 16.25 µg/m3 Running annual 31.12.2003 mean 5.00 µg/m3 Running annual 31.12.2010 mean 1,3-Butadiene 2.25 µg/m3 Running annual 31.12.2003 mean Carbon monoxide 10.0 mg/m3 Running 8-hour 31.12.2003 mean Lead 0.5 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004 0.25 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2008 Nitrogen dioxide 200 µg/m3 not to be 1-hour mean 31.12.2005 exceeded more than 18 times a year 40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2005 3 Particles (PM10) 50 µg/m , not to be 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 (gravimetric) exceeded more than 35 times a year 40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004 Sulphur dioxide 350 µg/m3, not to be 1-hour mean 31.12.2004 exceeded more than 24 times a year 125 µg/m3, not to be 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 exceeded more than 3 times a year 266 µg/m3, not to be 15-minute mean 31.12.2005 exceeded more than 35 times a year Progress Report 7 Date April 2010 Harlow District Council - England 1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments The Council undertook previous rounds of Review and Assessment of air quality. The main issue with respect to local air quality was found to be road traffic emissions (NO2) emanating from vehicles, but it was considered that the air quality objectives would be met where there was relevant exposure and that it was not necessary to designate an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) in the District. Report type and date Issue Outcome Progress Report 04 Vehicles/ NO2 All objectives achieved Progress Report 05 Vehicles /NO2 All objectives achieved USA 06 Vehicles /NO2 All objectives achieved Progress Report 07 Vehicles /NO2 All objectives achieved Progress Report 08 Vehicles /NO2 All objectives achieved USA 09 Vehicles /NO2 All objectives achieved 8 Progress Report Harlow District Council – England Date April 2010 2 New Monitoring Data 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken 2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites Harlow District Council currently has no Automatic Monitoring Site. The Council opened its continuous site in 2001 and closed it in late 2008. The site was classified as a background site and the provisional 2008 results are shown in Table 1 along with all recent years from 2003. Although it should be noted that as reported in the Council‟s previous Updating and Screening assessment for 2006, that there were instrument problems in 2005. These problems continued into 2006 and for both these years there was insufficient data capture to report. There was almost full data capture in 2007 and the annual mean concentration met the annual mean nitrogen dioxide objective. The annual mean concentration for both 2003 and 2004 was similar, although there was reduced data capture for each of these years. Table 1 Results of monitoring at the Harlow monitoring site (µg m-3) (2003 – 2008) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Annual mean 33.9 33.0 N/A N/A 34 29.4 Data capture % 71.8 65.0 99.9 64.2 2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Harlow District Council undertook monitoring at 4 NO2 diffusion tubes sites in 2009 their locations are shown at figure 2.2 and details are presented in table 2.2. Details of Non- Automatic Monitoring Sites The diffusion tubes are supplied and analysed by Harwell Scientifics Preparation method : 50% TEA in acetone United Kingdom Accreditation Services (Testing Laboratory number 1015). WASP – Annual Performance Criteria for NO2 Diffusion Tubes used in Local Air Quality Management (LAQM), 2008 onwards, and Summary of Laboratory Performance in Rounds 103-107. Prepared by AEA on behalf of Defra and the Devolved Administrations. Table 1 Laboratories that have demonstrated satisfactory performance in the WASP scheme for analysis of NO2 diffusion tubes, July 2007 – July 2008. Laboratory Performance on basis of RPI, OLD Performance on basis of RPI, CRITERIA, best 4 out of the 5 rounds NEW CRITERIA ,best 4 out of 103-107 the 5 rounds 103-107 Harwell Scientifics Good Good Progress Report 9 Date April 2010 Harlow District Council - England The diffusion tubes and their placement are not part of any co-location study With regard to the application of a bias adjustment factor for the diffusion tubes, the technical guidance LAQM.TG (09) and Review and Assessment Helpdesk recommends use of a local bias adjustment factor where available and relevant to diffusion tube sites.
Recommended publications
  • Foster Street, Harlow
    Foster Street, Harlow Phase 1 Desk Study Report Hastingwood Developments Limited GB505-P1DSR-MAR-2018 March 2018 DISCLAIMER GB Card & Partners Limited has prepared this report in accordance with instructions from Constable Homes Limited (“the Client”) under the terms of its appointment for consulting engineering services by the Client. The report is for the sole and specific use of the Client and GB Card & Partners Limited shall not be responsible for any use of the report or its contents for any purpose other than that for which it was prepared and provided. Should the Client require passing copies of the report to other parties for information, the whole of the report should be so copied. No professional liability or warranty shall be extended to other parties by GB Card & Partners Limited in this connection without the explicit written agreement thereto by GB Card & Partners Limited. Record of issue Author Checked Approved Laura Bacon Rob Benson Ian Cutler Principal Engineer Principal Engineer Associate Director BSc CGeol EurGeol FGS BSc MSc CEng MICE FGS MEng CEng MICE Reference: GB/505 Record of distribution Rev Status Issue Date Organisation Contact Copies 0 FINAL March 2018 Hastingwood Developments Limited Norman Gill PDF Only GB Card & Partners Limited is committed to optimising energy efficiency, reducing waste and promoting recycling and re-use. In the interests of the environment this document has been issued in electronic format. Paper copies are available on request. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tesco Church Langley
    Environmental Permit Pollution Prevention and Control Act 1999 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 Tesco Stores Ltd Church Langley Filling Station Church Langley Way Harlow Essex CM17 9TE Permit reference EPR/B/1/14 Tesco Church Langley Contents Introductory note Permit Conditions: Petrol delivery Motor vehicle refueling Incident reporting Best available techniques Process changes Right of appeal Status Log Detail Date Comment Date first authorised 22nd December 1998 EPR Authorisation Permit issued 8th February 2006 PPC Permit Varied permit issued 11th December 2008 EPR Permit Varied permit issued 12th February 2015 PG 1/14 (13) revisions 1 Introductory Note This introductory note does not form part of your Environmental Permit conditions, however it does provide useful information about the Environmental Permitting Regulations: The following Permit is issued under Regulation 13(1) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (S.I 2010 No.675), (“the EPR”) to operate a scheduled installation carrying out an activity, or activities covered by the description in section 1.2 B (c) (d) of Part 2 to Schedule 1 of the EPR, to the extent authorised by the Permit. Conditions within this Permit detail Best Available Techniques (BAT), for the management and operation of the installation, to prevent, or where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions. In determining BAT, the Operator should pay particular attention to relevant sections of the LAPPC Process Guidance note [PG 1/14 (13)] and any other relevant guidance. Techniques include both the technology used and the way in which the installation is designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study Chapters 1 to 5
    Harlow Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study Prepared by LUC on behalf of Harlow District Council July 2013 1 Project Title: Harlow Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study Client: Harlow District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Principal V1 11 June Matt Emma Deen Philip Smith 2012 Parkhill/Emma Deen V2 12 July Matt Emma Deen Philip Smith 2012 Parkhill/Andrew Tempany/Emma Deen V3 21 Final draft Matt Parkhill Matt Parkhill Philip Smith March /Andrew 2013 Tempany V4 28 Final Matt Parkhill Matt Parkhill Philip Smith March /Andrew 2013 Tempany V5 2 July Final (re issued) Matt Parkhill Matt Parkhill Philip Smith 2013 /Andrew Tempany Harlow Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study for Harlow District Council July 2013 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London NW1 1JD Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management T 020 7383 5784 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology F 020 7383 4798 London NW1 1JD LUC uses 100% recycled paper Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 Acknowledgements: The Harlow Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study was steered by officers from Harlow District Council – Dianne Cooper, Alex Robinson, David Watts and Darren Fazackerley. It was undertaken by LUC, with the project being led by Philip Smith and project managed by Emma Deen. Input on the open space study was provided by Diana Manson, Matt Parkhill and Helen Cooper, and the Green Infrastructure Plan was developed by Andrew Tempany, Alex Massey, Fearghus Foyle and Aamer Ather.
    [Show full text]
  • VPS SPD Consultation Statement
    Parking Standards Design and Good Practice Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement (Regulation 17 Statement) In the preparation of draft Supplementary Planning Guidance the Department for Communities and Local Government advises authorities to informally involve local communities and other stakeholders in the development of policies. Work on the Parking Standards Design and Good Practice document commenced in May 2007 by the forming of a Parking Standards Review Group. This group was led by officers of the Essex County Council Strategic Development section working with colleagues from both within Essex County Council and Essex local authorities. A list of those involved is included on page iii of the document. The development of the draft Parking Standards Design and Good Practice document has taken place over a 24-month period and comprised the following main activities: Residents Survey May- September 2007 (to complement a related existing survey undertaken in 2006) Group Site visits June – July 2007 Individual site visits, evening and weekends June – July 2007 Education meeting August 2007 Regular Review Group meetings May – April 2008 Review of other authority Parking Standards May – April 2008 SEA September 2008 – March 2009 Public Consultation March – April 2009 The scope and outcome of these activities are summarised below: 1. Residents Survey A survey was undertaken by Essex County Council term consultant’s Mouchel, to ascertain the opinions of local residents from housing developments that had recently been constructed
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Harlow in Essex
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Harlow in Essex Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions November 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the district of Harlow in Essex. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 206 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 23 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Harlow is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 28 November 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 30 November 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Harlow under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Harlow in Essex
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Harlow in Essex June 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are statutorily required to review periodically the electoral arrangements – such as the number of councillors representing electors in each area and the number and boundaries of wards and electoral divisions – of every principal local authority in England. In broad terms our objective is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, and the number of councillors and ward names. © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page SUMMARY v 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3 REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED 9 4 ANALYSIS AND DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 11 5 NEXT STEPS 21 APPENDIX A The Statutory Provisions 23 A large map illustrating the existing and proposed ward boundaries for Harlow is inserted inside the back cover of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • London Commuter Belt (East)/M11 Sub Region
    London Commuter Belt (East)/M11 Sub-Region Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 Report of Study Findings January 2010 London Commuter Belt (East)/M11 Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 Opinion Research Services, The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Jonathan Lee Nigel Moore · Chris Broughton · Catherine Nock · Hugo Marchant enquiries 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk Savills Lemsford House, 14 Parkway, Porters Wood, St Albans, Herts AL3 6PA Housing Investment & Consultancy David Harrison · Jo Greenbank enquiries 01727 810192 Brentwood Borough Council, Town Hall, Ingrave Road, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8AY Geoff Boyton (Principal Planner) [email protected] 01277 312609 Borough of Broxbourne, Bishops’ College, Churchgate, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, EN8 9XQ Colin Haigh (Planning Policy Manager) [email protected] or Jackie Cottingham (Housing Policy and Project Manager) [email protected] 01992 785521 East Herts District Council, Wallfields, Pegs Lane, Hertford, SG13 8EQ John Careford (Senior Planning Officer) [email protected] 01992 531623 or Claire Bennett (Housing Strategy Manager) [email protected] Epping Forest District Council, Civic Offices, High Street, Epping, Essex, CM16 4BZ Amanda Wintle (Senior Planning Officer) [email protected] 01992 564543 or Chris Sobey (Principal Housing Officer) [email protected] Harlow Council, Civic Centre, The Water Gardens, Harlow, Essex, CM20 1WG Jane Greer (Housing Strategy and Partnerships Manager) [email protected] 01279 446395 Uttlesford District Council, Council Offices, London Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, CB11 4ER Suzanna Clarke (Housing Strategy and Planning Manager) [email protected] 01799 510543 or Hannah Hayden (Planning Officer) [email protected] Page 2 Contents Section 1: Introducing the Study .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Commission for England
    AN N L I S ICK B R ED O R R Eastwick Hall Farm K C O Hunsdonbury C H A R L R D O iv Gilston Park A W er O S Durrington R R to H O r C t Y A (N Hall D a W vig H ati IG on H ) 4 1 4 3 8 A Research Laboratory 1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ) B ion gat avi (N tort r S Home Wood ive Sheering Hall RIVE R RSID RE E CO D URT RI CK Aylmers Farm S The Old Rectory LA NE AD O R G IN R EE SH Redericks Farm E A S T Hunsdon House W IC ok K ro C P B H in y A A ce ce L M y B in L W r P B Y o L ok R L A D N I W D Church E O Pole Hole Farm G O E D C R L O O S A E D E M S O a L r C s F h L U L N a A n R e D PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF HARLOW A O The House R K IC Ealing Bridge W T S A The E AD RO Cottage RT HA O L D R F Y O i A A Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Harlow d W D T d E R M l E e P IV L r R E s B ' A Parkside House N B K r o E o V O November 2000 k R G NE VI Riverside House Roman Temple Hollingson Meads R E N Campions R O C E Y Gilston P D H MARSH LANE A C O A R O G R N P I P R E A E N H O S I R ) T iv on A er ati Sto vig T r a Y t (N S A S P W R IO T R S Y Templefields House A A Mayfield Farm R V T EN E U I E O T N N I R R PLACE O P NORTH A D M AN OR RO AD 1 83 1 B 1 M S T E Old Harlow DM Temple Fields UN D' R S W IV A E Y R W A Y E Y A W D T N H E I D N L E D I L G M B IE H F U L A I IL R L M Y G L F I H E L P D L O A E C U L C N L Brickhouse Farm E D E V O A S ' R HN S Eastwick E O O E J A T S A S D T R O 4 1 S A 4 T D A J EA O D STWICK ROAD H A RO R N RY O B ' U S B D R E A W O OAD N V N R A TO E ING A A E WATL C D S
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction and Aims
    PACEC Introduction and Aims 1 Introduction and Aims 1.1 The Background 1.1.1 In May 2004 Harlow Council, funded by ODPM, appointed PACEC and Halcrow to develop a Regeneration Strategy and Implementation Framework for Harlow. The context of the project was that Harlow had been identified by the Government as a potential growth area in the Sustainable Communities Plan. Related policy development included Regional Planning Guidance (RPG14) and the East of England Plan. The brief stated that the Harlow Strategy would clearly articulate Harlow’s regeneration needs and priorities for investment, and detail the extent to which these can be achieved through housing growth and other factors. The Framework will be set within the context of a vision for a regenerated Harlow and the role(s) it could play in the sub-region. 1.1.2 The Strategy will: a Build on and develop in practical ways the substantive work already undertaken in the region on alternative growth scenarios, infrastructure and development needs. b Articulate Harlow’s regeneration needs and priorities for investment, and detail the extent to which these can be achieved through housing growth and other factors. c Ascertain how future infrastructure investment opportunities can be realized to bring maximum benefit to the area and people of the town. d Develop a regeneration strategy and implementation framework to feed into the RPP process. 1.1.3 The Strategy will consider three alternative development related scenarios, and short, medium and long term infrastructure and investment needs. The project will involve four stages. An inception stage one which primarily focuses on the regeneration needs and issues and provides an evidence base.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 April PIX:Layout 1.Qxd
    The Law www.essex.police.uk 40th anniversary issue April 1969-April 2009 CiB Anglia Communic8 2008 awards winner – best small internal publication FOCUSAnglia CIPR PRide awards TURNS 2008 finalist – best newspaper or magazine TO NEW BRIEFINGS A NEW briefing system is being intro- duced across the force to standardise briefings for front-line police officers, PCSOs and Specials. ACC Peter Lowton, responsible for Territorial Policing, wants every division to return to traditional-style briefings and appointed Supt Acting Sgt Mark Luke Collison, of South Eastern Division, to lead Hodgson briefs his the project. shift on the Focus has already been trialled Southend Central on South Eastern for two months and reactions have been extremely Neighbourhood favourable from sergeants, const - Policing Team ables and PCSOs. Supt Collison said the aim was to standardise the briefing process and the quality of content across the force while Picture by Julia Pack placing a renewed emphasis on debrief- ing and feedback to assess the effective- ness of local patrols and taskings. ACC Peter “I am really pleased with how well Lowton Focus has been received by front-line officers and with the support they have given to the trial, which has made it such a success,” said Supt Collison. Mr Lowton said he wanted to return to the days of structured daily team briefings where officers were directed and tasked by their sergeant before their patrols began. “I am confident that this system will deliver by investing in this vital process – officers will have better clarity regarding their priorities and, as a result, be more effective overall.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Essex Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Essex Green Infrastructure Strategy Appendices Part C - Technical Research Papers A strategy that champions for high quality green space and green infrastructure in Essex 2020 Front Cover Image of Essex Natural Capital by Place Services. Page a of a Contents 2 Appendix C1 - Spatial data integration and analysis to support the Essex Green Infrastructure Strategy 31 Appendix C2 - Health Impact Assessment - Essex Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 44 Appendix C1 - Spatial data integration and analysis to support the Essex Green Infrastructure Strategy Andrew Lovett and Gisela Sünnenberg July 2019 Exploring data. Enhancing knowledge. Empowering society www.BLGdataresearch.org Image: Essex County Council Page 2 of 44 Abstract Essex County Council are producing a green infrastructure strategy and require an understanding of both current provision in the county and how this relates to the sites for future housing and economic development put forward within the Local Development Plans for Essex. This report describes work which has: • combined a number of spatial data sources to map the distribution of green infrastructure assets across Essex; • identified the functions performed by these assets and the benefits they provide to the local populations; • investigated associations between green infrastructure provision in neighbourhoods and socio-economic characteristics of their resident populations; • examined the prevalence of current green infrastructure assets in the vicinity of proposed sites for future housing and economic development. The results are intended to help identify needs and opportunities to enhance green infrastructure across the county and inform strategic planning in Essex. Keywords: Green Infrastructure, Assets, Functions, Benefits, Essex Page 3 of 44 1 Introduction The population of Greater Essex is projected to increase by over 18% to Since there are many types of G I the range of possible data sources is extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Premier Inn Hotels Ltd LOCATION: Potters Arms Public House
    REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 6 June 2018 REFERENCE: HW/FUL/18/00034 OFFICER: Ganesh Gnanamoorthy APPLICANT: Premier Inn Hotels Ltd LOCATION: Potters Arms Public House Church Langley Way Harlow Essex CM17 9TD PROPOSAL: Erection of Three Storey, 46 Bedroom Premier Inn Hotel with Plant Compound, Additional 46 Car Parking Spaces (88 in total), Landscaping, Repositioned Car Park Entrance, Extension and Realignment of School Waiting Area and Access. LOCATION PLAN: REASON BROUGHT TO COMMITTEE: More than 2 representations received which are contrary to Officer’s recommendation. Application Site and Surroundings The application site is located at The Potters Arms Public House, Church Langley Way, which is within a Neighbourhood Centre, as shown on the Adopted Replacement Harlow Local Plan (ARHLP) Proposals Map. The site encompasses The Potters Arms Public House in the south, associated parking immediately to the north, and an area of scrubland in the northern most part of the site. Vehicular access to the site is from an entrance to the north east of the Public House, which spurs off from a private access road. The site is situated on the north-eastern side of Church Langley Way, close to the roundabout leading on to the A414. To the north of the site is Church Langley Community Primary School, to the east of the site is a Tesco supermarket and to the south of the site is a Tesco petrol station. The supermarket and petrol station also fall within the designated Neighbourhood Centre. The land directly to the north and west of the site is designated Green Wedge in the Adopted Replacement Harlow Local Plan (2006).
    [Show full text]