DOCSLIB.ORG

WMATA DRAFT Proposed Capital Budget FY2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FY2022 – FY2027 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPITAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY .......................................................................................................... 4 CAPITAL PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................ 5 CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................... 7 CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES ............................................................................................... 8 10-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN ........................................................................................................................... 10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INVESTMENT PAGES ................................................................ 11 HOW TO READ THE 10-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN .......................................................................................162 10-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN TABLES ...........................................................................................................163 APPENDIX A FY2020 STATE & LOCAL FUNDING RECONCILIATION .................................................236 APPENDIX B GLOSSARY OF TERMS ....................................................................................................238 APPENDIX C GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS ..........................................................247 Table of Contents 3 Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program CAPITAL INVESTMENT Capital Investment Priorities - Safety and Reliability STRATEGY Metro’s capital program is focused on improving Metro’s Value to the Region and the Need for the safety, security, state of good repair and Capital Investment reliability of the system. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit After many decades of deferred maintenance and Authority (Metro) system is the publicunderinvestment, Metro accumulated a transportation backbone of the National Capital significant backlog of overdue safety and state of Region, connecting residents and visitors across good repair needs. Capital investments the region to jobs, housing, food, education, successfully implemented over the last several healthcare, essential services, opportunities, and years like SafeTrack, the 7000 series railcar entertainment. The system supports the acquisition, and the Platform Improvement sustainability, livability and the economy of the Program have reduced the backlog and improved region, protects the environment and helps performance and reliability. advance racial and social equity in ourMetro has more work to do to catch up on community. Metro also plays a critical role in overdue state of good repair needs – including supporting the federal government. rehabilitation and replacement of platforms, The Metro system is the result of substantial bridges, power upgrades, signal and regional and federal infrastructure investment. communications systems, and facilities. At the Continued capital investment is vital sameto time, Metro is focused on sustaining safety maintaining the system in safe and reliable and state of good repair of all system assets condition. Through the Capital Improvement through recurring lifecycle maintenance, Program (CIP), Metro advances capital projects rehabilitation and replacement programs. and programs to restore, sustain and modernize In addition to the core priorities of safety and the system. reliability, Metro considers policy and other The foundation of the CIP is the organization’s factors in the development of the CIP, including top priorities of Safety, Service Reliability and sustainability, equity and resiliency; Financial Responsibility as well as the plan to improvements to the customer experience; Keep Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable regulatory findings and corrective action plans; (KMSRA). modernization and efficiency; emerging technology; project readiness; and jurisdiction Capital Strategy sponsored improvements. Metro’s Capital Strategy is to: Financial Accountability • Invest in the system to provide safe and Metro is committed to responsible stewardship of reliable service for customers, employees federal, state and local capital investments that and the region, enabled the progress we have made over the • Address the backlog of overdue state of good past five years. Following-through on that repair needs, commitment, Metro continues to improve: • Sustain safety and reliability through recurring maintenance, rehabilitation and • A structured process for capital planning, replacement programs, prioritization and decision-making, • Modernize the system for customers and • Capital program website and frequent employees, progress updates for customers and • Maintain financial accountability, and stakeholders, and • Support a sustainable and more equitable • Detailed and timely capital program future for the region. financial reporting for funding partners. 4 Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program Metrobus CAPITAL PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS • Bus Vehicle Replacement and Rehabilitation • Replacement of Obsolete Bus Divisions at Capital Improvement Program Highlights Northern & Bladensburg & Planning for Metro’s proposed $12.3 billion FY2022-FY2027 Western CIP and $2.6 billion FY2022 Capital Budget focus • Zero Emission Bus Program to Test and capital investment on safety, security, state of Evaluate Technology & Prepare for Larger good repair and reliability of Metrorail, Metrobus, Scale Deployment and MetroAccess and the facilities, infrastructure • Bus Customer Facility Improvements – Bus and systems that support our transit network. Stops, Transit Centers and Customer Highlights of priority CIP investments to restore, Information modernize and sustain the system include: • Roadway and Signal Improvements for Bus Priority (with jurisdictions) Metrorail • Replacement of Bus Fareboxes (including • Platform Improvement Program – Nine More test of rear-door payment technology) Priority Stations to be Completed MetroAccess • Rehabilitation of Bridges & Other Aerial Structures • Lifecycle Replacement of Paratransit Vehicles • Tunnel Rehabilitation and Water Mitigation Operations and Business Support • Rehabilitation of Train Control Equipment & Priority investments to restore, modernize and Planning for the Next Generation Signal sustain support functions include: System • Construction of Consolidated Office Buildings • Rehabilitation & Upgrade of Rail Power in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Systems Virginia • Replacement & Upgrade of Communications • Facility Roof Replacement Systems – Including Radio Infrastructure & Equipment • Information Technology Hardware and Software Replacement, System Preservation • Track Rehabilitation & Maintenance and Cyber Security Improvements • Ventilation Improvements – Red Line Pilot • Replacement Data Center • 8000 Series Railcar Acquisition to Replace • Financial System Replacement 2000/3000 Series Cars Metro’s CIP is grouped into six major investment • Railcar Rehabilitation & Maintenance categories: Railcars and Railcar Facilities; Rail • Railcar Heavy Repair & Overhaul Facility Systems; Track & Structures; Stations & • Rehabilitation & Optimization of Railyards Passenger Facilities; Bus, Bus Facilities and and Maintenance Facilities Paratransit; and Business and Operations Support. Detailed CIP project and program • Replacement & Rehabilitation of Elevators & Escalators information is included in this publication beginning on page 18 for the CIP • Deployment of Mobile Fare Payment & and page 163 for the 10-Year Plan. Replacement of Faregates 5 Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program Six-Year CIP by Investment Category Capital Investment FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 6-Year Categories ($M) Budget Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Total Railcar & Railcar Facilities $342 $346 $437 $530 $517 $422 $2,595 Rail Systems $273 $337 $308 $256 $203 $213 $1,591 Track & Structure Rehabilitation $343 $456 $259 $236 $237 $267 $1,798 Stations & Passenger Facilities $792 $530 $354 $302 $268 $272 $2,519 Bus, Bus Facilities & Paratransit $294 $388 $467 $418 $184 $196 $1,947 Business & Operations Support $546 $468 $239 $206 $220 $207 $1,887 Total Capital Investments $2,591 $2,526 $2,064 $1,949 $1,628 $1,578 $12,336 Revenue Loss from Capital Projects $17 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $67 Debt Service - Dedicated Funding1 $0 $91 $190 $250 $311 $362 $1,204 Total Capital Program Cost $2,608 $2,627 $2,264 $2,208 $1,949 $1,951 $13,607 1 Projections subject to change based on actual debt requirements and terms of future debt issuance 6 Washington Metropolitan FY2022 – FY2027 Proposed Area Transit Authority Capital Improvement Program CAPITAL PROGRAM Metro’s CIP and 10-Year Capital Plan rely on the best available information at the time of DEVELOPMENT development and are updated at least annually. Capital Planning and Program Development Annual Capital Expenditure Budget Metro’s capital program includes a 10-year In accordance with Article VIII, paragraph 26 of Capital Plan, a Six-Year Capital Improvement Metro’s Compact,
Recommended publications
  • Landover Alternative

    Landover Alternative

    6.0 Landover Alternative Chapter 6 describes existing conditions of the Figure 6- 1: Landover Conceptual Site Plan affected environment and identifies the environmental consequences associated with the consolidation of the FBI HQ at the Landover site. A detailed description of ¨¦§495 the methodologies employed to evaluate impacts for BRIGHTSEAT ROAD ¨¦§95 each resource and the relevant regulatory framework is given in chapter 3, Methodology. The Landover site consists of approximately 80 acres of vacant land located near the intersection of Brightseat Road and Landover Road in Prince George’s County, Maryland. It is bound on the north by Evarts Street, on the east by the Capital Beltway, on the south by Landover Road, and on the west by TRUCK & EVARTS STREET SECONDARY Brightseat Road. Previously, the site was home to the TRUCK VEHICULAR SCREENING GATE Landover Mall, which operated between 1972 and REMOTE DELIVERY 2002. As of December 2014, all facilities associated FACILITY with Landover Mall have been demolished, and only STANDBY SUBSTATION GENERATORS the surface parking lot and retaining walls remain MAIN LANDOVER ROAD VEHICULAR GATE CENTRAL UTILITY WOODMORE TOWNE CENTRE on-site. Commercial uses in proximity to the site (EXIT ONLY) PLANT MAPLE RIDGE include Woodmore Towne Centre, located across the EMPLOYEE Capital Beltway (Interstate [I]-95) to the east, and the APARTMENTS PARKING Arena Plaza Shopping Center. South of Landover VISITOR CENTER Road. West of the site along Brightseat Road is the VISITOR PARKING 202 Maple Ridge apartment complex, while H.P. Johnson Park, additional apartment and single-family residential communities are located north of the site.
  • Assignment to VPRA of Amtrak & VRE Agreements

    Assignment to VPRA of Amtrak & VRE Agreements

    June 28, 2021 Assignment to VPRA of Amtrak & VRE Agreements Six Agreements To Be Assigned Passenger Rail Improvement Funding and Partnership Agreement (March 26, 2021) A M T Master Property Lease (March 26, 2021) R A Operating Agreement (April 14, 2021) K Passenger Rail Improvements and Funding Agreement (March 26, 2021) V Passenger Station Ground Lease Agreement (March 26, 2021) R E Passenger Rail Operations and Access Agreement (March 26, 2021) 2 Scope and Effect of Proposed Amtrak and VRE Assignments • 3 Amtrak Agreements and 3 VRE Agreements recommended to be assigned from DRPT to VPRA • Follows the 7 previously assigned CSX agreements. • VPRA will be bound to DRPT’s duties. 3 AMTRAK AGREEMENTS 4 Bottom Line: Doubles State-Supported Amtrak Service in Virginia All current and future trains travel from Virginia to the Northeast Corridor Amtrak Funding Agreement Amtrak invests $944M for Amtrak Dispatch Rights Amtrak Maintenance Rights Phases 1&2 • Exclusive right to operate six • North of Alexandria after • Right of first refusal to provide new train starts; seven if Phase 2; maintenance of Virginia track Norfolk Southern agrees to after Phase 2 completion. another train to Roanoke • South of Alexandria after maximum feasible separation • Exclusive intercity operator between passenger and between Washington and freight tracks Richmond for 30 years after final new train start in Phase 2 • 24-month trial period to optimize service • Virginia has rights to terminate dispatching rights based on performance (10-year grace period) 6 Amtrak Funding Agreement Additional Amtrak Rights Key VPRA Responsibilities • Right of first refusal to purchase 1) DC to • Provide balance of Phase 1 and 2 funding Richmond or 2) S-Line from Petersburg to NC if VPRA sells.
  • Transportation Plan

    Transportation Plan

    Appendix B: City of Fredericksburg Comprehensive Plan Transportation Analysis July 2007 prepared for City of Fredericksburg by in association with City of Fredericksburg Transportation Analysis Comprehensive Plan Appendix B: Contents 1 Transportation Overview.......................................................................................................B-1 2 A Multi-Modal System ............................................................................................................B-1 2.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Ways ........................................................................................B-3 2.2 Roadways.........................................................................................................................B-7 2.3 Bus Transit....................................................................................................................B-12 2.4 Commuting...................................................................................................................B-12 2.5 Parking...........................................................................................................................B-15 2.6 Air, Rail and Bus Service.............................................................................................B-16 2.7 Movement of Goods and Services............................................................................B-17 3 Best Practices..........................................................................................................................B-17 3.1 Pedestrian
  • Quarterly Financial Report FY2017 -- Fourth Quarter April -- June 2017

    Quarterly Financial Report FY2017 -- Fourth Quarter April -- June 2017

    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Fiscal Year 2017 Financials Quarterly Financial Report FY2017 ---Fourth Quarter April ---June 2017 Page 1 of 62 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FY2017 --- Q4 April --- June 2017 _________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section Page Key Financial Performance Indicators 3 Operating and Capital Budget Summaries 8 Operating Financials by Mode 26 Parking Facility Usage 30 Capital Expenditures 32 Jurisdictional Balances on Account 41 Grants Activity 43 Contract Activity 45 Page 2 of 62 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FY2017 --- Q4 April --- June 2017 _________________________________________________________________ Key Financial Performance Indicators Page 3 of 62 Page 4 of 62 REVENUE AND RIDERSHIP 4th Quarter FY2017 REVENUE (in Millions) FY2016 Actual FY2017 Budget FY2017 Actual $85M 81 81 $80M 80 79 79 78 78 78 78 76 $75M 75 72 72 72 72 70 70 $70M 70 69 69 68 68 67 67 67 66 66 65 65 65 65 $65M 64 63 63 60 $60M 60 59 59 $55M $50M Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Cumulative Revenue Variance $0M (17.0) -$50M (27.0) (36.6) (45.6) (55.9) (64.6) (69.8) -$100M (76.9) (86.9) (103.0) (109.5) -$150M (116.3) RIDERSHIP (trips in Thousands) Q4 Q4-FY2016 Q4-FY2017 Variance FY17 Actual Actual Budget Prior Year Budget Metrorail 48,768 47,336 54,466 -3% -13% Metrobus 32,142 30,514 35,118 -5% -13% MetroAccess 595 607 618 2% -2% System Total 81,504 78,457 90,202 -4% -13%
  • Ceo Report February 2021

    Ceo Report February 2021

    CEO REPORT FEBRUARY 2021 FEBRUARY 2021 The Virginia Railway Express, a joint project of the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission and the Potomac Rappahannock Transportation Commission, will provide safe, cost‐effective, accessible, reliable, convenient, and customer responsive commuter‐oriented rail passenger service. VRE contributes to the economic vitality of its member jurisdictions as an integral part of a balanced, intermodal regional transportation system. FEBRUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS CEO REPORT I FEBRUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUCCESS AT A GLANCE ....................................................................................................................................... 3 ON‐TIME PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................................... 4 AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP ................................................................................................................................ 6 SUMMONSES ISSUED ......................................................................................................................................... 7 TRAIN UTILIZATION ............................................................................................................................................ 8 PARKING UTILIZATION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2020 .........................................................................................................
  • Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens

    Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens

    Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens In the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area JANUARY 2017 Transfer Station Station Features Red Line • Glenmont / Shady Grove Bus to Airport System Orange Line • New Carrollton / Vienna Parking Station Legend Blue Line • Franconia-Springfield / Largo Town Center in Service Map Hospital Under Construction Green Line • Branch Ave / Greenbelt Airport Full-Time Service wmata.com Yellow Line • Huntington / Fort Totten Customer Information Service: 202-637-7000 Connecting Rail Systems Rush-Only Service: Monday-Friday Silver Line • Wiehle-Reston East / Largo Town Center TTY Phone: 202-962-2033 6:30am - 9:00am 3:30pm - 6:00pm Metro Transit Police: 202-962-2121 Glenmont Wheaton Montgomery Co Prince George’s Co Shady Grove Forest Glen Rockville Silver Spring Twinbrook B30 to Greenbelt BWI White Flint Montgomery Co District of Columbia College Park-U of Md Grosvenor - Strathmore Georgia Ave-Petworth Takoma Prince George’s Plaza Medical Center West Hyattsville Bethesda Fort Totten Friendship Heights Tenleytown-AU Prince George’s Co Van Ness-UDC District of Columbia Cleveland Park Columbia Heights Woodley Park Zoo/Adams Morgan U St Brookland-CUA African-Amer Civil Dupont Circle War Mem’l/Cardozo Farragut North Shaw-Howard U Rhode Island Ave Brentwood Wiehle-Reston East Spring Hill McPherson Mt Vernon Sq NoMa-Gallaudet U New Carrollton Sq 7th St-Convention Center Greensboro Fairfax Co Landover Arlington Co Tysons Corner Gallery Place Union Station Chinatown Cheverly 5A to
  • New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment

    New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment

    New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment May 2011 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Final Report Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Planning and Joint Development Office of Station Area Planning and Asset Management May 2011 Lead Agency: Consultant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Parsons Brinckerhoff Authority Dudley Whitney, AICP, Project Manager Station Area Planning and Asset Management 1401 K Street NW Steven E. Goldin, Director Suite 701 Robin McElhenny, Manager of Station Area Planning Washington, DC 20005 John Magarelli, PE, Project Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Assessment of Existing Conditions ES-1 Future Bus Bay Requirements ES-3 Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 7 Station Characteristics 7 Rail Service 9 Bus Service 10 Assessment of Existing Conditions at New Carrollton Metro Station and Recommended Short-Term Improvements 15 Estimate of Future Bus Bay Requirements 25 Future Land-Use 26 Methodology 29 Bus Bay Requirements 30 Future Estimates 31 Appendix A: Calculation of Future Bus Bay Requirements 35 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment List of Figures Figure ES-1: Passenger Queues on the East Side ES-2 Figure 1: New Carrollton Metrorail Station Surrounding Area 1 Figure 2: Overview of the New Carrollton Bus Bays 7 Figure 3: Overview
  • Richmond Highway and Russell Road Alexandria, VA 22309 Richmond Highway and Russell Road

    Richmond Highway and Russell Road Alexandria, VA 22309 Richmond Highway and Russell Road

    RICHMOND HIGHWAY AND RUSSELL ROAD ALEXANDRIA, VA 22309 RICHMOND HIGHWAY AND RUSSELL ROAD OFFERING MEMORANDUM EXCLUSIVELY PRESENTED BY: Real Estate Services Since 1987 DEBRA ARNETT ED CAVE Direct: 703-537-3312 Mobile: 703-919-2149 [email protected] Direct: 703-537-3311 [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT The material contained in the Offering Memorandum is confidential, furnished solely for the purpose of considering the opportunity to develop the Property described herein, and is not to be used for any other purposed or made available to any other person without the express written consent of McEnearney Commercial Inc. (“Broker”). The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that we deem to be reliable, and we have no reason to doubt its accuracy. However, no warranty or representation, expressed or implied, is made by the Seller or Broker or any related entity as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Prospective purchasers should make their own investigation, projections, and conclusions. It is expected that prospective purchasers will conduct their own independent due diligence concerning the Property, including such engineering inspections as they deem necessary to determine the condition of the property and the existence or absence of any potentially hazardous materials. McEnearney Commercial Inc., represents the Seller in this transaction and makes no representations, expressed or implied, as to the foregoing matters. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 PREMIER LOACATION 5 PROPERTY ANALYSIS 11 MARKET ANALYSIS 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE OPPOrtUNITY 8306, 08, 12 Richmond Hwy McEnearney Commercial Inc., as exclusive agent, is pleased to offer the opportunity Street Addresses 8226 Russell Road to acquire 2.05 acres on the Richmond Highway Corridor in Alexandria, Virginia.
  • CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION from Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network

    CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION from Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network

    Report CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION From Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network DECEMBER 2020 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXISTING REGIONAL RAIL NETWORK 10 THE VISION 26 BIDIRECTIONAL RUN-THROUGH SERVICE 28 EXPANDED SERVICE 29 SEAMLESS RIDER EXPERIENCE 30 SUPERIOR OPERATIONAL INTEGRATION 30 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM 31 VISION ANALYSIS 32 IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS 47 KEY STAKEHOLDER IMPLEMENTATION ROLES 48 NEXT STEPS 51 APPENDICES 55 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The decisions that we as a region make in the next five years will determine whether a more coordinated, integrated regional rail network continues as a viable possibility or remains a missed opportunity. The Capital Region’s economic and global Railway Express (VRE) and Amtrak—leaves us far from CAPITAL REGION RAIL NETWORK competitiveness hinges on the ability for residents of all incomes to have easy and Perryville Martinsburg reliable access to superb transit—a key factor Baltimore Frederick Penn Station in attracting and retaining talent pre- and Camden post-pandemic, as well as employers’ location Yards decisions. While expansive, the regional rail network represents an untapped resource. Washington The Capital Region Rail Vision charts a course Union Station to transform the regional rail network into a globally competitive asset that enables a more Broad Run / Airport inclusive and equitable region where all can be proud to live, work, grow a family and build a business. Spotsylvania to Richmond Main Street Station Relative to most domestic peer regions, our rail network is superior in terms of both distance covered and scope of service, with over 335 total miles of rail lines1 and more world-class service.
  • Fairfax County Transit Network

    Fairfax County Transit Network

    Fairfax Connector Service Metrobus Service Metrorail Service Map Symbols Weekday, Saturday, and/or Sunday Service Rush Hour Only Service Limited-Stop and Express Service Metro MWY Metroway REX Orange Line Yellow Line Government Metrorail Station Middle School fairfaxconnector.com 630 301 432 557 641 924 Building FAIRFAX CONNECTOR Seasonal For Metrobus information visit wmata.com Blue Line Silver Line 340 558 640 981 305 461 622 642 926 396 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 For Metrorail information visit wmata.com Transit Station Hospital High School 703-339-7200 TTY 703-339-1608 306 350 559 650 335 462 623 644 927 697 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 City of Fairfax CUE Service BusTracker Park & Ride Police Station College/University 371 341 552 624 651 929 Service during most weekday hours. May also Virginia Railway Express (VRE) Service REAL-TIME SERVICE INFORMATION operate on Saturday and/or Sunday. GOLD GREEN @ffxconnector fairfaxconnector 467 351 553 631 652 980 Service during select weekday hours. Manassas Line Fredericksburg Line VRE Station Library Recreation Center 306 BEAC (Off-Peak or Rush Hour). May also operate For City of Fairfax CUE information visit H MILL 372 554 632 722 RD Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) ensures nondiscrimination in all programs and activities in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of on Saturday and/or Sunday. cuebus.org or call 703-385-7859, TTY 711 For VRE information visit vre.org or call (800) RIDE-VRE (743-3873) Limited-Stop or Express Service. Most operate Connector Store Airport 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  • Transaction 2040 Summary

    Transaction 2040 Summary

    TransAction 2040 Plan Projects and National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Constrained Long Range Plan Projects Corridor 1 – Dulles/VA 7 Corridor 3 – VA 28 2011-2040 CLRP Projects 2011-2040 CLRP Projects Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Projects Capital Cost Estimates (in Millions) Highway Highway 340 Construct Battlefield Parkway from U.S. 15 South of Leesburg to U.S. 15 Bypass north ..........................................$45.0 Construct interchanges along VA 28 between I-66 and VA 7 and widen to 8 lanes ............................................... $100.0 Widen Dulles Access Road from 4 to 6 lanes from Dulles Airport to VA 123 .................................................................$40.0 Reconstruct VA 28 adjacent to its existing alignment and construct overpass of Widen U.S. 15 to 4 lanes from Evergreen Mill Road to south city line of Leesburg ...................................................... $9.3 Norfolk-Southern Railroad B Line and an overpass of/interchange with Wellington Road ..............................$24.9 Construct an interchange on U.S. 15 Bypass at Edwards Ferry Road ..............................................................................$27.0 Widen Wellington Road to 4 lanes from Godwin Drive to VA 28 (Nokesville Road) ...................................................$15.7 Construct an interchange on VA 7 at VA 659 (Belmont Ridge Road) ...............................................................................$72.0 Trails Widen VA 7 to 6 lanes from Seven Corners
  • 2008 Transportation Management

    2008 Transportation Management

    Zone A Mixed-Use Development Armed Forces Retirement Home- Washington, D.C. Transportation Management Program July 10, 2008 Prepared for: Crescent Resources, LLC Washington, DC Prepared by: Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Linthicum, MD Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 TMP Organization .................................................................................................................5 2.0 Assessment of Transportation Conditions .....................................................6 2.1 Base Traffic Conditions........................................................................................................ 6 2.1.1 LOS/Traffic Congestion............................................................................................... 9 2.1.2 Modal Split...................................................................................................................10 2.2 Future Background Traffic Conditions................................................................................11 2.2.1 Future Zone A Development Traffic Forecast and Analysis.......................................12 2.2.2 Mitigation and Analysis...............................................................................................13 2.3 Work Setting Evaluation......................................................................................................18