DOCSLIB.ORG

Constructing the Foundations for Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE LE CENTRE D’EXCELLENCE for CRVS Systems sur les systèmes ESEC Constructing the Foundations for Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings SDG TARGET 16.9 LEGAL IDENTITY FOR ALL by Mia Harbitz and Dianne Hubbard Authors’ Note The research was commissioned by the Centre of Excellence for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) Systems at the International Development Research Centre in Ottawa, Canada. The paper is based on reviews of online resources, published literature and reports, as well as interviews with experts familiar with the civil registration processes in the four countries analyzed: Afghanistan, Georgia, Rwanda, and South Africa. The aim is to make these research findings widely accessible for discussion, debate, and use by the global CRVS community of practice. Published by the Centre of Excellence for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems. International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500, Ottawa, ON Canada [email protected] www.CRVSsystems.ca © International Development Research Centre 2021 The research presented in this publication was carried out with financial and technical assistance from the Centre of Excellence for CRVS Systems. Housed at the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), it is jointly funded by Global Affairs Canada and IDRC. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of Global Affairs Canada, IDRC, or its Board of Governors. Constructing the Foundations for Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings i Acknowledgements The authors thank the many individuals who shared key insights from their knowledge and experience: Keith Breckenridge, University of the Witwatersrand; Mariam Dolidze, World Bank; Nato Gagnidze, Innovations and Reforms Center; Kendra Gregson, UNICEF; Bahadur Hellali, Afghanistan National Statistics and Information Authority; Patricia Kheirallah, Norwegian Refugee Council; Patricia Lim Ah Ken, UNICEF; Francois Mugabo, UNICEF; David Nzeyimana, UNECA; Ezzatulla Raj, Norwegian Refugee Council; Maletela Tuoane-Nkhasi, World Bank; and Dimitry Zviadadze, Norwegian Refugee Council. Special thanks to Natalie Smith, research assistant, from Johns Hopkins University. The authors also thank Anette Bayer Forsingdal, Centre of Excellence for CRVS Systems; Montasser Kamal, Centre of Excellence for CRVS Systems; Jonathan Klaaren, University of the Witwatersrand; and Bronwen Manby, London School of Economics and Political Science for assisting in the review of the paper. Constructing the Foundations for ii Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings Abstract Despite mounting evidence of the need for people to have trusted and trustworthy identity credentials, little attention has been paid to the key determinants of an identity management system that establishes a person’s unique legal identity and issues reliable official identity credentials. Also overlooked is a country’s ability to register and give legal identity to everyone who lives within its borders, regardless of citizenship status. This paper aims to contribute to the achievement of Target 16.9 under Sustainable Development Goal 16 by analyzing the role of the civil register and the legal underpinnings for identity in four countries: Afghanistan, Georgia, Rwanda, and South Africa. It describes institutional and operational models in each country that support universal registration of births, deaths, and other vital events. Specifically, it describes the legal frameworks for civil registration (sovereign responsibility), institutional and administrative arrangements, registration of undocumented adults, marginalized populations and refugees, and legal and administrative capacity to handle adverse situations. It concludes by noting some areas needing particular attention. While the four countries are at different stages of maturity of their identity management systems, they are concerned with many of the same issues, such as increasing the coverage of civil registration, improving civil registration statistics, and advancing the efficiency, functionality, and coverage of their national identity management arrangements. Implicitly, the countries are attempting to provide all citizens, residents, and refugees with a legal identity, but in practice some of the countries fall short. The four countries have experienced, or are experiencing, internal conflict of varying degrees, from South Africa’s repressive apartheid regime to Afghanistan’s ongoing armed struggle, with Rwanda’s genocide as a defining moment for reconciliation, and Georgia’s latent ethnic frictions. Thus, despite the many differences between these four countries, they are instructive as a spectrum of approaches to identification management in post-conflict settings, with a number of commonalities. Keywords: Civil registration, governance, identity management, legal identity, citizenship, post- conflict, nationality, personal data protection Constructing the Foundations for Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................i Abstract ......................................................................................ii Constructing the Foundations for Legal Identity ..............................................1 Methodology ................................................................................ 3 Pathways to legal identity ................................................................... 3 Overcoming obstacles and setting agendas for change ..................................... 3 Laying the foundations of legal identity for all: Four approaches ............................ 4 Afghanistan ..................................................................................5 Background and context .................................................................... 5 Registration of vital events in the past ......................................................8 Legal framework for establishing legal identity. .9 Identity cards .............................................................................. 15 Data protection ............................................................................18 2020: Reacting to the COVID-19 pandemic. 18 Chapter summary ..........................................................................19 Georgia .....................................................................................20 Background and context ...................................................................20 Legal framework for establishing legal identity . .22 Efforts to upgrade the civil register ........................................................27 Identity cards ..............................................................................32 Data protection ............................................................................33 2020: Reacting to the COVID-19 pandemic. 35 Chapter summary ..........................................................................36 Rwanda .....................................................................................38 Background and context ...................................................................38 Legal framework for establishing legal identity. 41 Protection and citizenship for refugees .....................................................46 Civil registration in Rwanda ................................................................46 Data protection ............................................................................53 2020: Reacting to the COVID-19 pandemic. 54 Chapter summary ..........................................................................54 South Africa .................................................................................56 Background and context ...................................................................56 Legal framework for establishing legal identity. 59 Civil registration and identity cards in the past . 63 Civil registration in South Africa today ......................................................64 Identity cards ..............................................................................68 Data protection ............................................................................70 2020: Reacting to the COVID-19 pandemic. 71 Chapter summary ..........................................................................73 Constructing the Foundations for iv Legal Identity in Post-Conflict Settings Conclusions ................................................................................74 Civil registration coverage and systems. .74 Legal identities for different categories of persons . 77 Data protection ............................................................................78 Civil registration during the pandemic .....................................................78 Overarching observations ..................................................................79 Works consulted ............................................................................81 List of tables Table 1. Afghanistan at a glance. ................................................................6 Table 2. Historical overview. ....................................................................6 Table 3. Afghanistan’s legal framework for establishing legal identity. ..........................9 Table 4. Georgia at a glance. ....................................................................21 Table 5. Historical overview. ....................................................................21
Recommended publications
  • Fragile States Index 2015

    Fragile States Index 2015

    FRAGILE STATES INDEX 2015 THE FUND FOR PEACE The Fund for Peace is an independent, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit research and educational organization that works to prevent violent conflict and promote sustainable security. We promote sustainable security through research, training and education, engagement of civil society, building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. A leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, The Fund for Peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing states. Our objective is to create practical tools and approaches for conflict mitigation that are useful to decision-makers. Copyright © 2015 The Fund for Peace. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Fund for Peace. Report Edited by Assessment Directed by J. J. Messner Nate Haken Report Written by J. J. Messner, Nate Haken, Patricia Taft, Hannah Blyth, Kendall Lawrence, Sebastian Pavlou Graham, Felipe Umaña Assessment Supported by Alex Young, Ania Skinner, Katie Cornelius Circulation: PUBLIC The Fund for Peace T: +1 202 223 7940 1101 14th Street NW, Suite 1020 F: +1 202 223 7947 Washington, D.C. 20005 www.fundforpeace.org The Fund for Peace is grateful for the support of: Foreign Policy magazine is the media partner of the Fragile States Index www.foreignpolicy.com www.fundforpeace.org Fragile States Index 2015: Overview The Fragile States Index is an annual The Index in Figures ranking of 178 nations based on their levels of Index of Country Analysis 2015 Map 4 stability and the pressures they face.
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia

    Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia

    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
  • Law of Georgia on the Legal Status of Aliens and Stateless Persons

    Law of Georgia on the Legal Status of Aliens and Stateless Persons

    Law of Georgia on the Legal Status of Aliens and Stateless Persons Section I General Provisions Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 - Aims, objectives, and scope of the Law 1. Under the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia, as well as universally recognised principles and norms of international law, this Law is intended to: a) establish legal guarantees for aliens and stateless persons in Georgia according to universally recognised human rights and freedoms, and in line with state interests; b) protect universally recognised rights of aliens and stateless persons irrespective of race, colour, language, gender, religion, political, and other views, nationality, ethnic and social belonging, origin, property status and rank; c) promote the development of relations between Georgia and foreign states in economy, culture, education, and science; d) strengthen the rights of free movement and free choice of residence, as well as the free choice of activity and profession as guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia; e) strengthen the conformity of Georgian legislation governing the legal status of aliens and of persons having the status of stateless person in Georgia, with universally recognised standards of international law and international agreements of Georgia; f) support international cooperation in preventing illegal migration; avoid spontaneous and unorganised migration; ensure the implementation of a targeted migration policy. 2. This Law regulates the legal basis and mechanisms for entry, stay, transit, and departure of aliens into/in/through/from Georgia; defines the rights and obligations of aliens and stateless persons, the types and procedures for removal of aliens staying in Georgia, and the scope of competence and responsibility of state institutions involved in the process of removal.
  • Minority Issues Mainstreaming in the South Caucasus

    Minority Issues Mainstreaming in the South Caucasus

    MINORITY ISSUES MAINSTREAMING IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS A P RACTICAL G UIDE Tbilisi, February 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: 7 1. Introduction: Minorities in Europe 8 1.1 A Diffi cult Defi nition 8 1.2 Key Issues for Analyzing Minorities in the South Caucasus 10 1.3 Specifi c Aspects of Minority Issues in the South Caucasu 12 SECTION ONE: 15 LEGAL COMMITMENTS AND POLICY AREAS Key Terms: 16 1. Commitments to Minority Participation: Regulatory/Policy Frameworks 17 1.1 Overview 17 1.2 International Legal and Semi-legal Instruments 17 1.3 European Legal and Semi-Legal Instruments 22 1.4 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) 27 2. International Organisations Engaged in Minority and Ethno-Political Issues in the South Caucasus 32 2.1 United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG, 1993-2009) 32 2.2 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) 32 2.3 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 34 2.4 Council of Europe (CoE) 38 2.5 The European Union 40 2.6 Major Assistance Initiatives in the South Caucasus 52 2.7 OSCE’s Offi ce for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) 58 2.8 The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) 59 2.9 Other state actors 60 3. Cumulative List of Tools – Section 1 63 SECTION TWO: 67 MINORITY NEEDS ANALYSES AND MINORITY ISSUES RESOURCES Key Terms: 68 Introduction 69 1. ARMENIA – Minority Needs Analysis 71 1.1 Statistics 71 1.2 Overview 71 1.3 Legal Status of Minorities 73 1.4 Political Participation 77 1.5 Language Issues 78 1.6 Education 79 1.7 Employment 81 1.8 Media 82 1.9 ENP Priority Areas and General Objectives 83 2.
  • Fragile Contexts in 2018

    Fragile Contexts in 2018

    CHAPTER ELEVEN Leaving No Fragile State and No One Behind in a Prosperous World: A New Approach Landry Signé undreds of millions of people are left behind in fragile states despite the efforts of the international community to make progress on development Hand alleviate conflict. People in fragile states are victim to persistent poverty,1 enduring violence, poor public facilities, deteriorating infrastructure,2 limited civil and political liberties,3 deteriorating social conditions,4 minimal to nonexistent economic growth,5 and, often, humanitarian crises.6 Research and policies on state fragility build on concepts of limited state capacity, legitimacy, insecurity, stability and socioeconomic, demographic, human development, environmental, humanitarian, and gender contexts to determine states’ apparent effectiveness or ineffectiveness in fulfilling the role of the state. Within this -con text, fragility has become a catch- all concept encompassing fragile states, weak states, failed states, collapsing or decaying states, conflict- affected countries, post- conflict countries, brittle states, and states with limited legitimacy, author- ity, capacity, governance, security, and socioeconomic and human development. 1. Collier (2007). 2. Rotberg (2011). 3. Bah (2012). 4. Van de Walle (2004). 5. Brainard and Chollet (2007). 6. Nwozor (2018). The author would like to express his sincere appreciation to Payce Madden, Genevieve Jesse, and Elise El Nouchi, who contributed to the research, data analysis, fact- checking, and visual elements of this chapter. 239 Kharas-McArthur-Ohno_Leave No One Behind_i-xii_1-340.indd 239 9/6/19 1:57 PM 240 Landry Signé When used without conceptual clarification and contextual consideration, as is often the case, the concept of fragility lacks usefulness for policymakers, as the various types, drivers, scopes, levels, and contexts of fragility require differ- ent responses.
  • Abkhazia: Deepening Dependence

    Abkhazia: Deepening Dependence

    ABKHAZIA: DEEPENING DEPENDENCE Europe Report N°202 – 26 February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. RECOGNITION’S TANGIBLE EFFECTS ................................................................... 2 A. RUSSIA’S POST-2008 WAR MILITARY BUILD-UP IN ABKHAZIA ...................................................3 B. ECONOMIC ASPECTS ....................................................................................................................5 1. Dependence on Russian financial aid and investment .................................................................5 2. Tourism potential.........................................................................................................................6 3. The 2014 Sochi Olympics............................................................................................................7 III. LIFE IN ABKHAZIA........................................................................................................ 8 A. POPULATION AND CITIZENS .........................................................................................................8 B. THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL POLL ..................................................................................................10 C. EXTERNAL RELATIONS ..............................................................................................................11
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

    International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

    United Nations CERD/C/SR.2103 International Convention on Distr.: General 22 August 2011 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Seventy-ninth session Summary record of the 2103rd meeting Held at the Palais Wilson, Geneva, on Wednesday, 17 August 2011, at 10 a.m. Chairperson: Mr. Kemal Contents Consideration of reports, comments and information submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention (continued) Fourth and fifth periodic reports of Georgia (continued) This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Editing Unit, room E.4108, Palais des Nations, Geneva. Any corrections to the records of the public meetings of the Committee at this session will be consolidated in a single corrigendum, to be issued shortly after the end of the session. GE.11-44776 (E) 180811 220811 CERD/C/SR.2103 The meeting was called to order at 10.10 a.m. Consideration of reports, comments and information submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention (continued) Fourth and fifth periodic reports of Georgia (continued) (CERD/C/GEO/4-5; CERD/C/GEO/Q/4-5) 1. At the invitation of the Chairperson, the delegation of Georgia took places at the Committee table. 2. The Chairperson invited the delegation to proceed with its replies to questions raised by members of the Committee at the previous meeting.
  • Chechen Border Area

    Chechen Border Area

    Islamic revival in Georgian – Chechen border Area Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of Master of Philosophy in Anthropology of Development By Nino Siprashvili Department of Social Anthropology University of Bergen July 2014 2 Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Kists Between the “Fatherland” and “Motherland”..……………………………………………………………………………..12 Islam in the Village ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27 Challenging Authority ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………47 Women and the Public Sphere ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..64 Pankisian Modernity …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….74 3 Introduction: Since the collapse of the Soviet Union all the former Soviet countries have been going through changes in social and religious life. Muslim states strongly tied their identities to Islam while countries with a majority of Christians started to tie their identities to the Christian religion. Georgia is a country with a majority of Christians and therefore a religious revival of the orthodox Christian religion has taken place. There are several groups of people though (Chechens (Kists), Azerbaijanis, Daghestanians) who represent Muslim minorities in the country. Focus of the thesis will be the processes of religious and social changes the Chechen Muslim minority community in Pankisi valley has undergone after dissolution of the Soviet Union and state building process in Georgia. More precisely, it will address what the religious situation is currently in
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms Of

    International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms Of

    United Nations CERD/C/SR.2102 International Convention on Distr.: General 29 December 2011 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: French Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Seventy-ninth session Summary record of the 2102nd meeting Held at the Palais Wilson, Geneva, on Tuesday, 16 August 2011, at 3 p.m. Chairperson: Mr. Kemal Contents Consideration of reports, comments and information submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention (continued) Fourth and fifth periodic reports of Georgia This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Editing Unit, room E.4108, Palais des Nations, Geneva. Any corrections to the records of the public meetings of the Committee at this session will be consolidated in a single corrigendum, to be issued shortly after the end of the session. GE.11-44757 (E) 131211 291211 CERD/C/SR.2102 The meeting was called to order at 3.05 p.m. Consideration of reports, comments and information submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention (continued) Fourth and fifth periodic reports of Georgia (CERD/C/GEO/4-5, CERD/C/GEO/Q/4-5) 1. At the invitation of the Chairperson, the delegation of Georgia took places at the Committee table. 2. Mr. Tchiaberashvili (Georgia) said that the report under consideration was the result of fruitful cooperation between the main stakeholders working in the field of human rights in Georgia.
  • National Minorities in South Caucasus

    National Minorities in South Caucasus

    Dr. Ahmad Shahidov Azerbaijan Institute for Democracy and Human Rights (AIDHR) www.aidhr.org [email protected] +99450 372 87 30 NATIONAL MINORITIES IN SOUTH CAUCASUS Today, Azerbaijan is distinguished with ethnic diversity. Besides Azerbaijani Turks, Mountain Jews, Tats, Talysh, Kurds, Molokans, Ingiloys, Tsakhurs, Avars, Lezgins, Khynalygs, Buduqlus, Grysz and other ethnic groups live in its territory. Although the representatives of ethnic groups consider themselves as Azerbaijanis but each group has retained distinctive elements of their different culture. This culture is reflected in domestic life, crafts, in kitchen and various ceremonies. Despite the difficulties being experienced by Azerbaijan, due to the unresolved armed conflict that continues more than a decade with neighboring Armenia, which occupies 20 percent of the Azerbaijani territory and the presence of about one million refugees and forcibly displaced persons - victims of ethnic cleansing organized by the Armenian armed forces and terrorist groups, among whom in addition to Azerbaijanis there are persons belonging to various minorities (Kurds, Russians, Jews and others), as well as problems connected with transitional period, the Government of Azerbaijan continues to pursue a consistent policy towards protection of minorities rights. 1 National minorities constitute 9.4 % of the population of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Here is a structural composition of population, languages and places of compact living of persons belonging to national minorities of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Lezgins - 178 thousand, compactly live in the Northern regions of Azerbaijan. Language of communication is Lezgins, relating to the Daghestan branch of the Caucasian languages, as well as Azerbaijani and Russian languages. Russians - 141,7 thousand, compactly live in the industrial cities, as well as a number of rural regions.
  • The Fragility-Grievances-Conflict Triangle in the Middle East

    The Fragility-Grievances-Conflict Triangle in the Middle East

    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article The Fragility-Grievances-Conflict Triangle in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): An Exploration of the Correlative Associations † Timo Kivimäki Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; [email protected] † For fruitful comments on previous version of this article, I am grateful to Talip Alkhayer, Rana Jawad and Olivia Perry as well as to the three anonymous referees of Social Sciences. I am also grateful for the UK Global Challenges Research Fund project “Conflict and peace-building in the MENA region: is social protection the missing link?” (Grant number AH/T003537/1) for funding this research. My funders or the commentators of this paper are naturally not responsible for the interpretations and possible mistakes in this study. Abstract: The intention of this special issue of Social Sciences is to study state fragility and its relationship with conflict and grievances in the post-Cold War Middle East and North Africa (MENA). This article will lay the foundation for such a study by offering a conceptual foundation, data and the identification of the correlative associations that are specific to the MENA region. This article suggests that the relationship between political legitimacy, factionalism of the state, and conflict needs special, MENA-specific emphasis, as this relationship seems more prominently different in the MENA region, compared to the rest of the world. While in the rest of the world, different aspects of state fragility all relate to grievances and conflict dynamics, in the MENA region political factionalism has a disproportionate role in the explanation of conflict grievances and violence.
  • The Fund for Peace Fragile States Index 2015: Country Indicator Scores

    The Fund for Peace Fragile States Index 2015: Country Indicator Scores

    FRAGILE STATES INDEX 2015 THE FUND FOR PEACE The Fund for Peace is an independent, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit research and educational organization that works to prevent violent conflict and promote sustainable security. We promote sustainable security through research, training and education, engagement of civil society, building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. A leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, The Fund for Peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing states. Our objective is to create practical tools and approaches for conflict mitigation that are useful to decision-makers. Copyright © 2015 The Fund for Peace. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Fund for Peace. Report Edited by Assessment Directed by J. J. Messner Nate Haken Report Written by J. J. Messner, Nate Haken, Patricia Taft, Hannah Blyth, Kendall Lawrence, Sebastian Pavlou Graham, Felipe Umaña Assessment Supported by Alex Young, Ania Skinner, Katie Cornelius Circulation: PUBLIC The Fund for Peace T: +1 202 223 7940 1101 14th Street NW, Suite 1020 F: +1 202 223 7947 Washington, D.C. 20005 www.fundforpeace.org The Fund for Peace is grateful for the support of: Foreign Policy magazine is the media partner of the Fragile States Index www.foreignpolicy.com www.fundforpeace.org Fragile States Index 2015: Overview The Fragile States Index is an annual The Index in Figures ranking of 178 nations based on their levels of Index of Country Analysis 2015 Map 4 stability and the pressures they face.