Feminist Trouble

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feminist Trouble Feminist Trouble Feminist Trouble Intersectional Politics in Postsecular Times ÉLÉONORE LÉPINARD 1 3 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2020 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data Names: Lépinard, Éléonore, author. Title: Feminist trouble : intersectional politics in post-secular times / Éléonore Lépinard. Description: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2020] | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Identifiers: LCCN 2019034419 (print) | LCCN 2019034420 (ebook) | ISBN 9780190077150 (hardback) | ISBN 9780190077167 (paperback) | ISBN 9780190077181 (epub) Subjects: LCSH: Feminism. Classification: LCC HQ1155 .L466 2020 (print) | LCC HQ1155 (ebook) | DDC 305.42—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ 2019034419 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ 2019034420 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Paperback printed by Marquis, Canada Hardback printed by Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc., United States of America Contents Acknowledgments vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Theorizing Feminism: Politics, Morals, and Emotions 23 3 Race, Religion, and Gender: Feminist Intersectional Politics in “Postsecular” Times 45 4 Feminist Whiteness 81 5 Resisting Whiteness, Claiming Feminism: Racialized Feminists’ Moral Addresses 127 6 Toward a Feminist Ethic of Responsibility 179 7 Conclusion: Revisiting the “We” of Feminism 234 Appendix on Methodology 251 Notes 257 Bibliography 295 Index 317 Acknowledgments This book is dedicated to all the feminists who gave some of their time to an- swer my questions, who shared their thoughts, analyses, despairs, and hopes, and enabled me, not to adopt their perspectives and standpoints, but to enter in relation, to understand what is important for them, and for us. For many reasons writing this book has been an experience in the strong sense of something that gave me a voice, shared with many of my interviewees, an encounter with the unpredictable, and a descent into myself to understand my own attachment to feminism. I hope this book conveys to readers the pleasure of giving some intelligibility to one’s own experiences of feminism. It certainly provided me with the pleasure of deploying my own thoughts with freedom— a rare chance, and an addictive experience. I want to thank especially my editor at Oxford University Press, James Cook, who believed in this book and in its unusual interdisciplinarity and style. This experience has been made possible by various institutional supports; the grant I received from the Fond Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture, which allowed me to conduct the fieldwork; and the support of the two universities I was a faculty member of during the time of research and then writing, the Université de Montréal and the Université de Lausanne. In both those places I found among my colleagues good friends, with the dose of humor that is necessary to sail through academic life with pleasure. I am very grateful for their friendship. At the Université de Lausanne I have been lucky to join a Center on Gender Studies that has allowed me to focus on feminist theory and provided me with fantastic doctoral students with whom to exchange ideas on feminism and feminist theory. Support also came in the form of assistance from Marie Laperrière, for interviews in the fieldwork; from Muriel Bruttin, for formatting the manuscript and dealing with soft- ware bugs; and from Madeleine Arenivar, for copy-editing. The three did a wonderful job, and I thank them deeply for their skillful work. During the course of writing, I was lucky to receive feedback on this project and invitations to present my work from several colleagues, whom I thank here for their generosity and their insights: Amélie Barras, Pascale Dufour, Elizabeth Evans, Delphine Gardey, Matteo Gianni, Leslie McCall, Noémi viii Acknowledgments Michel, Marylène Lieber, Sabrina Marchetti, Sarah Mazouz, Bruno Perreau, Anne Phillips, and Gloria Wekker. I am also very grateful to Pascale Molinier, who introduced me years ago to the work of Teresa de Lauretis and of care theorists. It took me a while to act upon this invitation to explore beyond the boundaries of my discipline, sociology, but the journey has been enlivening. Finally, the title of this book is indebted of course to Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble, a book that starts by looking directly into the trouble within fem- inism and that profoundly marked my own political subjectivation when I read it and discussed it with young fellow French feminists in search of new political and feminist horizons two decades ago. More than support, my partner in life and parenting, Grégoire Mallard, read the whole manuscript, encouraged me to break disciplinary shackles, and never doubted that this manuscript would see the light of day. His kind- ness, generosity, and humor compose the music of our life together. 1 Introduction Feminism is in trouble. Antagonisms, conflicts, and disputes abound in many liberal democratic countries around pop culture, neoliberalism, and postfeminism, around sex work and pornography (yes, still), around trans* politics, around race and postcolonialism. They seem to concentrate, with an ever- escalating force, around religion, in particular Islam. In many corners of Europe and North America, it has been not a small irony of history that women’s rights have been presented by right-wing movements as a new na- tional treasure against which to judge immigrants’ claims to be included in the political community, and claims by Muslim citizens to equal treatment in the face of the perpetuation of racial exclusion and discrimination in Western postcolonial societies. Even if voices rising from within feminist movements have denounced hegemonic whiteness,1 racism, colonial aphasia,2 and Islamophobia when they are associated with feminist claims, they have remained, in many contexts, marginal and marginalized. For many, the col- lusion of feminist ideals with right-wing populism and xenophobic political agendas puts in peril the future of feminism as a political utopia. The feminist collective project thus seems to be once again fragmented and disintegrated and in urgent need of reinventing itself. The increasingly heated disputes about the place of Islam in liberal democracies may not be surprising, considering the broader geopolitical landscape that the liberal democracies in Europe and North America have inherited since the terrorist attacks of 9/ 11. Nationwide debates questioning the compatibility of Islam with European or “Western” culture and its con- ception of secularism have focused on gender relations,3 and have there- fore moved to the center of the feminist agenda. Veils, niqabs, forced and arranged marriages, polygamy and sharia rules concerning women have all been the object of intense public scrutiny and legal regulations in many Western countries since the 1990s, and these policy debates have split the women’s movements into various positions with regard to the status of gen- dered symbols and gender relations associated with the practice of Islam.4 With a particular intensity in Europe, the feminist concern about gender Feminist Trouble: Intersectional Politics in Postsecular Times. Éléonore Lépinard, Oxford University Press (2020). © Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/ oso/ 9780190077150.001.0001 2 Feminist Trouble inequalities in “minority cultures” has become closely intertwined with na- tional anxieties about the boundaries of the political community, its het- erogeneity, and the necessity to integrate groups perceived as embodying different cultural and religious values.5 Few European states have been left untouched by these political dynamics, which have led to the imposition of more restrictions on Islamic practices. Between 2003 and 2019, bans on forms of Islamic veiling (in public service, public schools, or public space) have been adopted in France, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Austria,
Recommended publications
  • The Veil As Exception and Difference in French Discourse and Policy
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 3-2011 The veil as exception and difference in French discourse and policy Mallory Anne Warner DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Warner, Mallory Anne, "The veil as exception and difference in French discourse and policy" (2011). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 75. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/75 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Veil as Exception and Difference in French Discourse and Policy A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts March, 2011 BY Mallory A. Warner International Studies Program College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview A History of French Immigration and the Headscarf Affairs in France 6 The Veil in Colonial Algeria 6 France’s Exceptional Universalism 7 2. HISTORY OF FRENCH IMMIGRATION AND THE HEADSCARF AFFAIRS IN FRANCE 2.1 History of Immigration 8 2.2 1988­1989: The Presidential Elections of 1988 and the First Headscarf Affair 13 2.3 1993­1994: Pasqua Laws and the Bayrou Circular 17 2.4 2003­2004: The Stasi Report 19 Secularism in Schools 21 2.5 Conclusion 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Secularism, Racism and the Politics of Belonging
    Runnymede Perspectives Secularism, Racism and the Politics of Belonging Edited by Nira Yuval-Davis and Philip Marfleet Disclaimer Runnymede: This publication is part of the Runnymede Perspectives Intelligence for a series, the aim of which is to foment free and exploratory thinking on race, ethnicity and equality. The facts Multi-ethnic Britain presented and views expressed in this publication are, however, those of the individual authors and not necessarily those of the Runnymede Trust. Runnymede is the UK’s leading independent thinktank ISBN: 978-1-906732-79-0 (online) on race equality and race Published by Runnymede in April 2012, this document is relations. Through high- copyright © Runnymede 2012. Some rights reserved. quality research and thought leadership, we: Open access. Some rights reserved. The Runnymede Trust wants to encourage the circulation of its work as widely as possible while retaining the • Identify barriers to race copyright. The trust has an open access policy which equality and good race enables anyone to access its content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute relations; this work in any format, including translation, without • Provide evidence to written permission. This is subject to the terms of the support action for social Creative Commons Licence Deed: Attribution-Non- Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & change; Wales. Its main conditions are: • Influence policy at all levels. • You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work; • You must give the original author credit; • You may not use this work for commercial purposes; • You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th Commemorations of the Genocide Against the Tutsis: "Mr
    25th Commemorations of the Genocide against the Tutsis: "Mr. President, it is time to make a statement of truth! " Mr. President, It has been 25 years since the genocide against the Tutsis has been perpetrated in Rwanda. Over the course of three months, more than one million people were exterminated by extremists coming together as the Hutu Power movement, with a massive participation of the population. The consequences of this genocide are still felt today. This past, particularly for France, does not pass. Since your election, you have sent signals of hope that the time has come to put an end to the French position characterized by silence and denial since the genocide took place. After 25 years, it is finally time to take the necessary steps in order to shed light on the truth and pursue justice. Mr. President, next April 7th your place is in Kigali, amongst the highest representatives of the international community. By the side of the survivors. France has cancelled its participation at the 20th commemoration of the genocide; your presence this year would repair this disgrace. What survivors, youth, French civil society, Rwanda, and Europe are expecting from you first and foremost is that truth be told. Even though genocide denial persists in its attempt to manipulate History, you must state the obvious : in 1994, in Rwanda, a genocide has been perpetrated against the Tutsi people. You must further explain the words spoken in Kigali in 2010 from your predecessor, former President of the French Republic Nicolas Sarkozy, who recognized that “errors of judgement and political errors have been made here and have produced absolutely dramatic consequences”.
    [Show full text]
  • NEVER AGAIN Association
    Genocide Against The Tutsis: ‘Mr. French President, It Is Time To Speak The Truth!’ Benjamin Abtan Published on April 6, 2019 Mr. President, It has been 25 years since the genocide against the Tutsis has been perpetrated in Rwanda. Over the course of three months, more than one million people were exterminated by extremists coming together as the Hutu Power movement, with a massive participation of the population. The consequences of this genocide are still felt today. This past, particularly for France, does not pass. Since your election, you have sent signals of hope that the time has come to put an end to the French position characterized by silence and denial since the genocide took place. After 25 years, it is finally time to take the necessary steps in order to shed light on the truth and pursue justice. Mr. President, next April 7th your place is in Kigali, amongst the highest representatives of the international community. By the side of the survivors. France has cancelled its participation at the 20th commemoration of the genocide; your presence this year would repair this disgrace. What survivors, youth, French civil society, Rwanda, and Europe are expecting from you first and foremost is that truth be told. Even though genocide denial persists in its attempt to manipulate History, you must state the obvious : in 1994, in Rwanda, a genocide has been perpetrated against the Tutsi people. You must further explain the words spoken in Kigali in 2010 from your predecessor, former President of the French Republic Nicolas Sarkozy, who recognized that “errors of judgement and political errors have been made here and have produced absolutely dramatic consequences”.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour Related Violence Within a Global Perspective: Mitigation and Prevention in Europe
    European Conference Report Honour Related Violence within a Global Perspective: Mitigation and Prevention in Europe Stockholm 7-8 October, 2004 1 Preface Honour related violence (HRV) has come to manifest itself more clearly in Europe during the last decade. It includes honour killings, forced marriages, early marriages, and honour based violence of predominantly males against females. The European Union (EU) has set gender equality as one of its primary goals. Many girls and women today all over Europe are subjected to discrimination and violence within their families and community settings. However, the recognition and the level of awareness about honour related violence vary between the countries. The key objective for holding a European conference in Stockholm was to exchange knowledge and experience between the European countries as well as gaining insight from work in different countries in the Middle East. It also aimed to place the Swedish and the European problems concerning HRV in a global context and to co-ordinate and ensure more effective national and transnational work against HRV in Europe. Concrete outputs we hoped to achieve were to adopt an action plan for the future European agenda, and to highlight examples of good practice from various parts of Europe, which succeeded. This conference is part of two initiatives to combat HRV within EU-funded projects that Kvinnoforum co-ordinates with partners from eight countries; New Scotland Yard and Change, UK, TransAct, the Netherlands, Papatya and Terre de Femmes, Germany, Mannerheim Child Foundation, Finland, Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies, Cyprus, Bulgarian Gender Research Foundation, Bulgaria, Fundacion Mujeres, Spain and Institute of Equality, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam Councils
    THE MUSLIM QUESTION IN EUROPE Peter O’Brien THE MUSLIM QUESTION IN EUROPE Political Controversies and Public Philosophies TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia • Rome • Tokyo TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 www.temple.edu/tempress Copyright © 2016 by Temple University—Of Th e Commonwealth System of Higher Education All rights reserved Published 2016 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: O’Brien, Peter, 1960– author. Title: Th e Muslim question in Europe : political controversies and public philosophies / Peter O’Brien. Description: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifi ers: LCCN 2015040078| ISBN 9781439912768 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781439912775 (paper : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781439912782 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Muslims—Europe—Politics and government. | Islam and politics—Europe. Classifi cation: LCC D1056.2.M87 O27 2016 | DDC 305.6/97094—dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015040078 Th e paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992 Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Andre, Grady, Hannah, Galen, Kaela, Jake, and Gabriel Contents Acknowledgments ix 1 Introduction: Clashes within Civilization 1 2 Kulturkampf 24 3 Citizenship 65 4 Veil 104 5 Secularism 144 6 Terrorism 199 7 Conclusion: Messy Politics 241 Aft erword 245 References 249 Index 297 Acknowledgments have accumulated many debts in the gestation of this study. Arleen Harri- son superintends an able and amiable cadre of student research assistants I without whose reliable and competent support this book would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Chair
    Summer 2008 L’Arc Volume 22 New York University French Programs Newsletter Letter From The Chair For some years now, much time has been devoted and the other in its Western suburb, raised questions of at every level of academic institutions in this country, but redundancy, overlap, and integration. But it was not sim- also elsewhere, to discussing the impact on Academia of ply a case of duplicates. The respective contexts and thus what is known in today’s public vocabulary as globaliza- the identities and status of these two superficially identi- tion. Is it but the latest version of one of Academia’s found- cal units were in fact very different. A worldwide seriali- ing ideals, that of translation studies? Is Academia con- zation of American satellite campuses (or European ones cerned by it? Should it be? Should it join it? Resist it? Can for that matter) is one thing (a university delivered, as it it not join it? What would either of the two outcomes entail? were, clés en mains.) A strong NYU French program in Paris, with organic ties to the Department These questions have prompted a and the IFS (the Institute of French whole gamut of commentaries and reac- Studies), is another. Needless to mention tions, ranging from the high-flown world the oddity that a NYU-sponsored French historical and philosophical to the minute Department in Paris with no organic ties budgetary practicalities of resource man- with the Department of French of NYU in agement, and from triumphal missionar- New York would constitute. Our NYU-in- ism to sarcastic skepticism, defensive France program predates the globaliza- indifference, and even to the fear that tion motto.
    [Show full text]
  • France and the United States: Borrowed and Shared National Symbols
    FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES: BORROWED AND SHARED NATIONAL SYMBOLS Katlyn Marie Crawford, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2011 APPROVED: Marie-Christine Koop, Major Professor, and Chair of the Department of Foreign Languages Christophe Chaguinian, Committee Member Lawrence Williams, Committee Member James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Crawford, Katlyn Marie. France and the United States: Borrowed and Shared National Symbols, Master of Arts (French), May 2011, 68 pp., 41 titles. This thesis analyzes and demonstrates the similarities and differences between some of the national symbols of France and the United States. This includes the shared and borrowed aspects of each one and the ways in which each culture is reflected through, and built around them. The flags, national anthems, and several national icons such as France’s Marianne and Uncle Sam are discussed. This analysis deals with the historical contexts and cultural meanings of the symbols, showing the changes each has undertaken in form and in national and international importance. Through the study of national symbols, this thesis reveals the similarities along with the differences between the two nations, which are often perceived as being highly dissimilar and even opposing in belief systems, cultures, and histories. Copyright 2011 By Katlyn Marie Crawford ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2: FLAGS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Burka Ban: Divergent Approaches to Freedom of Religion in France and in the U.S.A
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 20 (2011-2012) Issue 3 Article 4 March 2012 The Burka Ban: Divergent Approaches to Freedom of Religion in France and in the U.S.A. Ioanna Tourkochoriti Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Repository Citation Ioanna Tourkochoriti, The Burka Ban: Divergent Approaches to Freedom of Religion in France and in the U.S.A., 20 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 799 (2012), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ wmborj/vol20/iss3/4 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj THE BURKA BAN: DIVERGENT APPROACHES TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION IN FRANCE AND IN THE U.S.A. Ioanna Tourkochoriti* ABSTRACT Six years after prohibiting the wearing of headscarves by students in public schools, the French state passed a law prohibiting the wearing of burkas in public places. Compared to France, in the United States there is more tolerance for wearing signs of religious affiliation. The difference in legal responses can be understood in reference to a different background understanding of the fundamental presuppo- sitions of republicanism in the two legal and political orders, which also define their conception of secularism. The law enacted in France can be understood in a general frame of a paternalistic state, which is seen as permitted to dictate the proper exer- cise of their reason to the citizens. In the United States, the dominant understanding of republicanism attempts to reconcile the natural rights philosophy with the con- ception of the common good.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics on Activities During the Sixth Legislative Period (2004-2009)
    Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality The Secretariat FINALISED 11 MAY 2009 COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIG HTS AND GENDER EQUALITY STATISTICS ON MAIN ACTIVITIES DURING THE SIXTH LEGISLATIVE PERIOD (2004-2009) For more information, please contact FEMM secretariat: - tel: + 32 (0) 2 28 32058 - e-mail: [email protected] FEMM website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/femm_home_en.htm Link to committee meeting documents: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/organes/femm/femm_meetinglist.htm COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY STATISTICS ON MAIN ACTIVITIES DURING THE SIXTH LEGISLATIVE PERIOD (2004-2009) Content General overview.................................................................................................................................3 Committee Meetings............................................................................................................................3 Coordinators' Meetings ........................................................................................................................4 Public Hearings....................................................................................................................................6 Exchanges of views with VIPs...........................................................................................................18 External Delegations..........................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Republicanism Recast
    Université de Montréal Republicanism Recast: How the "Veil Affairs" Transformed French Republican Ideology and Public Discourse (2004–2014) par Kaisa Vuoristo Département de science politique Faculté des arts et des sciences Thèse présentée à la Faculté des arts et des sciences en vue de l'obtention du grade de Ph. D. en science politique Février 2017 © Kaisa Vuoristo, 2017 Résumé Depuis la loi interdisant le port de signes religieux "ostensibles" dans les écoles publiques (2004), un changement progressif s'est opéré en France. De l'interdiction du port du foulard intégral dans l'espace public (2010) aux mesures touchant les parents d'élèves (2012) et les employées des crèches privées (2014), les femmes portant le foulard islamique ont graduellement été exclues de différents espaces publics. Ces mesures sont souvent justifiées au nom de la nécessité de défendre la République ou de revitaliser les valeurs qui la sous‐tendent. À travers quels processus politiques y compris discursifs l'ex‐ clusion des femmes voilées est‐elle devenue une composante de la promotion des valeurs républi‐ caines ? Ma recherche se penche sur cette question à l'aide d'une approche conceptuelle et discursive de l'étude des idéologies politiques. Plus précisément, en ancrant mon analyse dans les discours publics entourant quatre "affaires du voile", ma recherche met en lumière la transformation graduelle du républicanisme français – une construction complexe à travers laquelle les concepts politiques acquièrent un sens. Cette analyse de l'idéologie républicaine française dans le contexte des "affaires du voile" révèle et continuité et changement. Continuité, car les anciens principes de liberté, égalité et fraternité y de‐ meurent centraux ; et changement, car de nouveaux idéaux ont modifié la signification de son noyau conceptuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Una Fondazione Europea Per Il Porajmos, L'olocausto Dei
    Una Fondazione europea per il Porajmos, l’Olocausto dei Rom Benjamin Abtan 26.01.2018 27 gennaio. Il campo di Lety, da porcile tornerà luogo della memoria. Ma non c’è in Europa uno strumento di conoscenza del loro storico sterminio e del razzismo che continuano a subire. Presto, l’allevamento di maiali costruito sul sito dell’ex campo di concentramento di Lety sarà distrutto. L’odore fetido che avvolge inevitabilmente i visitatori sarà scomparso. La stele collocata sulle fosse comuni verrà spostata. Sarà costruito un memoriale. Più di settant’anni dopo la fine della Seconda Guerra Mondiale, il sito dell’ex campo per i Rom a Lety, nella Repubblica ceca, sarà finalmente trattato con la dignità che merita. IL «LOCOCIDIO» – il crimine contro i luoghi – di Lety sarà finalmente fermato. Ottenere questo risultato è stato tutt’altro che semplice: è stato solo grazie ad una mobilitazione eccezionale della società civile europea, di Rom e non Rom insieme, che le autorità ceche ed i proprietari hanno finalmente concluso un accordo per l’acquisto dell’allevamento suino, in vista poi della sua distruzione. NONOSTANTE questo successo costituisca una vittoria storica, le problematiche che hanno reso Lety un simbolo europeo persistono tuttora in tutto il continente: la mancanza di conoscenza e di ricerca sull’Olocausto dei Rom (o Samudaripen, o Porajmos); il razzismo e la discriminazione che sono sotto molti aspetti la continuazione delle persecuzioni; l’emarginazione sociale che continua da decenni; l’ignoranza riguardo alla diversità delle culture e delle storie rom. Come dimostra il caso Lety, è solo attraverso un impegno risoluto e deciso da parte della società civile e delle istituzioni che si può mettere fine la storia della persecuzione del popolo rom, persecuzione perpetrata tutt’oggi e di cui il genocidio è il punto culminante.
    [Show full text]