DOCSLIB.ORG

Podcast Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Podcast Series Tinni Providing Hope for a Quieter Future ThroughT Education,us Advocacy, and ResearchToday Toward a Cure Vol. 42, No. 1, Spring 2017 ATA’s New Podcast Series First Aid Tools & Information A publication of the Visit & Learn More About Tinnitus Online at ATA.org ATA thrives through the dedication of a vast number of people, all of whom make a difference. Join the Jack Vernon Legacy Society Jack Vernon founded ATA in 1971 to lead the way in researching a cure, developing effective treatments, and creating broad-based support and awareness of tinnitus. ATA invites individuals and organizations to join our journey. How can you contribute? Monthly or annual financial Gifts of stock contributions Gifts of real estate Name ATA in your trust or estate Deferred gift annuities Ask ATA to create a Tribute Page in Donations to ATA in lieu of flowers in memory of a loved one memory of a loved one Convert stock and/or real estate into a unitrust We hope you’ll be a part of the legacy of securing silence for sufferers through a variety of cures, as well as finding treatments and sustained support for the millions who endure incessant noise and anxiety. For more information about adding ATA as a beneficiary or ways to reduce your taxes through charitable contributions, please contact Torryn Brazell, ATA’s Executive Director, via email at: [email protected]. Table of Contents EDITOR From the Editor ..................................................2 John A. Coverstone, AuD Sentient Healthcare, Inc. From the Board Chair .........................................3 CONSULTING EDITOR AND WRITER Joy Onozuka, MA From the Publisher ............................................4 American Tinnitus Association Letters to the Editor ...........................................5 COPY EDITOR Margaret L. Brown An Emergency Left Behind ................................6 MLB Communications Tinnitus by the Numbers ...................................8 PUBLISHER Torryn P. Brazell, MS, CAE The Sudden Loss of Silence ........................... 10 American Tinnitus Association 6 EDITORIAL ADVISORY PANEL An Optimized Tool for Tinnitus Research ......... 12 James W. Hall III, PhD University of Hawaii, Manoa ATA Support Network Calendar ...................... 13 Salus University & University of Pretoria Quieting Our Neighborhoods .......................... James A. Henry, PhD 14 National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR) Tinnitus You Will Want to Hear ........................ 16 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Poetic Reflection: About My Tinnitus .............. 17 Stephen M. Nagler, MD, FACS Atlanta Tinnitus Consultants, LLC An Objective Measure of Misophonia ............ 19 Gail M. Whitelaw, PhD Conversations in Tinnitus Department of Speech and Hearing Science 10 The Ohio State University with Dr. David Baguley ................................... 20 DIGITAL DESIGN & PRODUCTION TEAM Synaptopathy—A Cause of JML Design, LLC Potomac, MD Hidden Hearing Loss ...................................... 22 ADVERTISING Living With Tinnitus: Tinnitus Today is the official publication of the American Tinnitus Association. It Sudden Onset Hearing Loss ........................... 24 is published three times per year in April, August, and December and is mailed to Tinnitus Guidance for GPs .............................. 28 members and donors. To advertise, contact us at: [email protected] Demyelination—Another Cause HEADQUARTERS of Hidden Hearing Loss .................................. 30 522 SW. 5th St., Ste. 825 Portland, OR 97204 USA Why Do Some Professionals Hesitate to 14 Provide Tinnitus Care? .................................... 31 EDITORIAL OFFICE American Tinnitus Association P.O. Box 5, Portland, OR 97207 Special Donors & Tributes ............................... 32 +1-503-248-9985 800-634-8978 Treating Patients with Severe Tinnitus ............ 36 [email protected] www.ata.org ATA Funded Research: The American Tinnitus Association is a Including the Patient Perspective ................... 38 non-profit human health and welfare agency under 26 USC 501(c)(3). Don’t Make the Journey Alone ....................... 39 ADVERTISEMENT Publication of any advertisement 15 Things You Might Want to does not in any way or manner constitute or imply ATA’s approval or endorsement of any advertised Know About Somatosounds ........................... 40 product or service. 24 FROM THE EDITOR Change is in the Air One of the most frequent phrases heard by We are also extending Tinnitus Today by add- ATA staff is, “when will they find a cure???” It ing an ATA podcast series on tinnitus, hosted by is usually spoken with all three question marks, myself and my close friend and colleague, denoting both anticipation and some degree of Dr. Dean Flyger. The first episode was an exasperation. The mission of the American Tin- exciting conversation with Dr. David Baguley, nitus Association reflects our members’ hopeful researcher, clinician, and current President of support. Nothing is more prominent on the the British Tinnitus Association. More podcasts website than the Research Toward a Cure Road will be available every other month and may be Map. The ATA’s mission statement specifically accessed via the ATA website at www.ata.org. includes research, education, advocacy, and You can read more about the podcast series collaboration. This is not only to find a cure, but later in this issue. also to ensure that we have all the necessary I realize that some of our readers do not John A. Coverstone, AuD Editor components to support the search for a cure. use the internet and some others may be a bit Tinnitus Today Magazine In the meantime, ATA and its members exist to daunted by accessing a podcast. However, this help us all live with tinnitus until a cure is found. is essentially a radio program delivered online. We are currently in one of the most exciting If you have a relative or friend who can help periods of tinnitus care ever. We have more you download or subscribe to the podcast, or tools and more knowledge to assist in man- can possibly bring it to you, I think you will be aging tinnitus than ever before. Even more glad you did. There is nothing quite like listening exciting is the current research in tinnitus and to people talking about a subject. It becomes tinnitus-related disorders. The British Tinnitus much more personal and relatable. Association recently published the first edition One of the most important functions of of their Annual Tinnitus Research Review, edited Tinnitus Today is to communicate. ATA has a by Dr. David Baguley and Nic Wray. In this publi- long-standing history of bi-directional commu- cation, Dr. Baguley cites the increasing number nication through its magazine. Not only do we of research publications in recent years: twice prepare articles of interest to our readers, but as many in 2015 as in 2006 and four times as our readers participate strongly in the creation of many articles as in 1995. While we can’t project content for this magazine. I truly hope you will a date for a cure simply from increased publica- share your experiences and thoughts with us as tions or even comment about the quality of the well. If you have a story to tell or have questions research being conducted, this area has undeni- about tinnitus, tinnitus resources, or about any ably experienced increased interest and funding of our stories, I hope you will contact me at: in recent years. [email protected]. With all this in mind, Tinnitus Today will Be well and thank you for reading Tinnitus continue to bring you the latest research news Today. I can’t wait to hear from you. and helpful strategies for living with tinnitus. In becoming editor, it is my goal to ensure that Sincerely, the information in Tinnitus Today is the highest possible quality, is meaningful to all our read- ers, and is free from bias or influence from any outside sources. The importance of this is par- amount, as ATA must be a reliable and trusted resource for everyone living with and caring for those with tinnitus and related conditions. 2 TINNITUS TODAY SPRING 2017 FROM THE BOARD CHAIR A Life Without Tinnitus Can you remember what your life was like applied the lessons he learned in coping with before tinnitus? For those of us who remem- extreme suffering in a Nazi concentration camp ber the occasion when our ears first began to to a person’s experience in general. Each of our ring (or hiss, or shriek or whistle, or whatever lives has meaning, he said. It is up to each of us wretched sound most applies in your case), we to discover that meaning even while suffering. suspect we know the cause—and rue that day You can discover this meaning in life in three like no other. “If only I had used earplugs when different ways, wrote Dr. Frankl: (1) by creating I started up that chainsaw,” we might say. “If a work or doing a deed; (2) by experiencing only I hadn’t been stopped at that intersection something or encountering someone; and (3) when that car rear-ended me, and along with by the attitude we take in unavoidable suffering. the whiplash came tinnitus.” If we don’t know All these expressions of meaning look to the the cause of our tinnitus, we moan, “What did I present and the future, not the past of “if only Scott C. Mitchell, JD ever do to deserve this? My life before tinnitus this had not happened that caused my tinnitus.” Chair was good and now tinnitus makes me so miser- In the present, you can examine your situation ATA Board of Directors able. If only I had my own life back!” without the weight of all accumulated negative This “if only” thinking can drive you nuts. It emotions. Looking to the future, you can accept has the effect of directing your thoughts into the the challenge of insisting that your life still has past, with all the might-have-beens and should- meaning, no matter the suffering you happen to have-dones that could have avoided tinnitus. So be experiencing now. Just what that meaning is, along with the undeniable physical suffering that of course, is a discovery that is up to you.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter.Nobe 99 Lggg December 06-08
    j' This is a preprint or reprint of a paper intended for presentation at a conference. Because changes may be made before formal publication, this is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the author. Fort Lauderda|e, Florida, USA inter.nobe 99 lggg December 06-08 ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS TO REDUCE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE AT THE NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER: A FIVE-YEAR PROGRESS SUMMARY (1994-1999) Beth A. Cooper NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. Donald W. Hange Robert P. Madison International, Inc. NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. John J. Mikulic NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION At the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field (formerly the Lewis Research Center), experimental research in aircraft and space propulsion systems is conducted in more than 100 test cells and laboratories. These facilities are supported by a central process air system that supplies high-volume, high-pressure compressed air and vacuum at various conditions that simulate altitude flight. Nearly 100,000 ft 2 of metalworking and specialized fabrication shops located on-site produce prototypes, models, and test hardware in support of experimental research operations. These activities, comprising numerous individual noise sources and operational scenarios, result in a varied and complex noise exposure environment, which is the responsibility of the Glenn Research Center Noise Exposure Management Program. Hearing conservation, community noise complaint response and noise control engineering services are included under the umbrella of this Program, which encompasses the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard on occupational noise exposure, §29CFR 1910.95[ 1], as well as the more stringent NASA Health Standard on Hearing Conservation[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Hazardous Noise and Hearing Loss
    Preventing Hazardous Noise and Hearing Loss during Project Design and Operation Prevention through Design (PtD) Prevention through Design (PtD) Why is PtD Needed? Description of can be defined as designing out Integrating PtD concepts into busi- Exposure or eliminating safety and health ness processes helps reduce injury and hazards associated with processes, Prolonged exposure to high noise levels structures, equipment, tools, or illness in the workplace, as well as costs can cause hearing loss and tinnitus. work organization. The National associated with injuries. PtD lays the Other health effects include headaches, Institute for Occupational Safety foundation for a sustainable culture of fatigue, stress, and cardiovascular and Health (NIOSH) launched a safety with lower workers’ compensation problems [Yueh et al. 2003]. High noise PtD initiative in 2007. The mission expenses, fewer retrofits, and improved levels can also cause workers to be dis- tracted and interfere with communica- is to reduce or prevent occupational productivity. When PtD concepts are in- injuries, illnesses, and fatalities by tion and warning signals. If workers do troduced early in the design process, re- considering hazard prevention in not hear warning signals, they may not the design, re-design, and retrofit of sources can be allocated more efficiently. take precautions to prevent hazards or new and existing workplaces, tools, injuries [NIOSH 1996, 1998; Yoon et al. equipment, and work processes Summary 2015; Cantley et al. 2015]. [NIOSH 2008a,b]. Exposure to high noise levels in the workplace can cause hearing loss and Workers at Risk Contents affect worker productivity and compen- An estimated twenty-two million work- ▶ Why is PtD Needed sation costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Buy Quiet Procedure Esperance
    BUY QUIET PROCEDURE ESPERANCE BUY QUIET PROCEDURE - ESPERANCE DOCUMENT CONTROL Version Description Reviewed by Approved by Revision Issue Date Number Date 0 First Draft to include D Lindkvist A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 reference to Environmental Noise 1 Comments section 1 used A Byers A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 equipment 2 Environmental noise A Leonard A Byers Feb 2016 Feb 2016 3 Insertion of: Responsible A Leonard J Oldfield Jan 2017 Jan 2017 Person, role of Environmental Department and using broadband “croaker” reversing alarms. 4 Minor amendments. A Leonard A Leonard Nov 2017 Nov 2017 Document Facilitator: Environment Manager Version No: 04 Issue Date: 17/11/2017 Authorised by: Environment Manager Record No: D17/595 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Page 2 of 7 BUY QUIET PROCEDURE - ESPERANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT CONTROL .............................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 4 2. SP NOISE LEVEL GOAL ................................................................................ 4 3. TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................ 4 3.1. Requestor ....................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Appointed Noise Officer .................................................................................. 4 3.3. Environmental Department ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding
    Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding Final Report NSRP Subcontract Agreement No. 2012-424 Presented To: National Shipbuilding Research Program Operated by Advanced Technology Incorporated Prepared By: Daniel O. Chute, CIH, CSP Atrium Environmental Health and Safety Services, LLC Atrium Environmental Health and Safety Services, LLC 11495 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 210 Reston, VA 20190 November 1, 2012 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Final Report Noise Control Methods for Shipbuilding; NSRP Agreement No. 2012‐424 November 1, 2012 Page 2 of 14 Abstract Noise control has always been a big issue in shipyards. OSHA regulations for Occupational Exposure to Noise in 29CFR 1910.95 define specific requirements for shipyard employment, including surveillance, audiometric testing, training and use of approved PPE for exposures exceeding 85 dBA over a full shift. Experience has demonstrated that uncontrolled exposure represents a major loss-control issue by contributing to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL), citations, lower productivity and costly compensation claims. A wide variety of equipment and operations commonly found in shipbuilding have the potential to produce excessive noise levels requiring OSHA compliance action and the use hearing protection unless employers have sampling data to document their equipment operates below the action thresholds. The goal of this project was to accurately measure and characterize representative noise levels generated by common shipyard manufacturing and maintenance processes, to define both representative exposure levels and to evaluate and describe the most effective control methods which are currently in place. This work is designed to promote effective and beneficial technology transfer, so that techniques and processes that may have been proven in one or two locations may be passed along to other sites to promote noise exposure reduction, where possible, with reduced trial-and-error, better innovation and ultimately, reduced exposure time before implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Noise and Preventing Hearing Loss at Work Code of Practice 2021 Page 2 of 54
    Managing noise and preventing hearing loss at work Code of Practice 2021 PN12640 ISBN Creative Commons This copyright work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to Safe Work Australia and abide by the other licence terms. Managing noise and preventing hearing loss at work Code of Practice 2021 Page 2 of 54 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Who has health and safety duties in relation to noise? .......................................... 5 1.2 What is involved in managing noise and preventing hearing loss?........................ 7 1.3 Information, training, instruction and supervision ................................................... 8 2. Noise and its effects on health and safety ..................................................................... 9 2.1 How does hearing loss occur? ................................................................................ 9 2.2 How much noise is too much? ................................................................................ 9 2.3 Other effects of noise............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Designing out Hazards in the Real World
    Prevention Through Design Peer-Reviewed Practice Designing Out Hazards in the Real World By Anjali Lamba IOSH is leading a national initiative, development, implementation, employee training launched in July 2007, called Prevention and surveillance (Schulte & Heidel, 2009). NThrough Design (PTD). This initiative has As awareness of the PTD concept grows, more engaged the government, academia and industry SH&E professionals are calling for a concerted em- in promoting the concept of designing out and phasis on the engineering and technical aspects minimizing occupational risks. Following is a com- of a safe design during the planning phase, which prehensive definition of PTD: reduces risks and minimizes hazards throughout The optimal method of preventing oc- a facility’s life. This requirement is illustrated by a cupational illnesses, injuries and fatal- recent request for proposal for work at the Ports- ities is to “design out” the hazards and mouth Naval Shipyard that specified, “If it is not risks; thereby, eliminating the need to feasible to eliminate or prevent the need to work control them during work operations. at heights with its subsequent exposure to fall haz- This approach involves the design of ards, control measures shall be included in the de- tools, equipment, systems, work pro- sign to protect personnel conducting maintenance cesses and facilities in order to reduce work after completion of the project.” or eliminate, hazards associated with Research conducted in the U.S., European Union and some countries in the British Commonwealth IN BRIEF work. (Young-Corbett, 2011) has linked a good percentage of construction inju- •This article provides real- The purpose of PTD is to eliminate haz- ries and fatalities to decisions made before any con- world examples of preven- ards and reduce risk at the source by con- struction work started.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Loss Prevention, Chapter 296-817
    Chapter 296-817 WAC Introduction Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-817 WAC Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) (Form Number 414-117-000) This book contains rules for Safety Standards for hearing loss prevention (Noise), as adopted under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Chapter 49.17 RCW). The rules in this book are effective December 2015. A brief promulgation history, set within brackets at the end of this chapter, gives statutory authority, administrative order of promulgation, and date of adoption of filing. TO RECEIVE E-MAIL UPDATES: Sign up at https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/WADLI/subscriber/new?topic_id=WADLI_19 TO PRINT YOUR OWN PAPER COPY OR TO VIEW THE RULE ONLINE: Go to https://www.lni.wa.gov/safety-health/safety-rules/rules-by-chapter/?chapter=817/ DOSH CONTACT INFORMATION: Physical address: 7273 Linderson Way Tumwater, WA 98501-5414 (Located off I-5 Exit 101 south of Tumwater.) Mailing address: DOSH Standards and Information PO Box 44810 Olympia, WA 98504-4810 Telephone: 1-800-423-7233 For all L&I Contact information, visit https://www.lni.wa.gov/agency/contact/ Also available on the L&I Safety & Health website: DOSH Core Rules Other General Workplace Safety & Health Rules Industry and Task-Specific Rules Proposed Rules and Hearings Newly Adopted Rules and New Rule Information DOSH Directives (DD’s) See http://www.lni.wa.gov/Safety-Health/ Chapter 296-817 WAC Table of Contents Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-817 WAC Safety Standards for Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise) WAC Page WAC 296-817-099 Noise definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 31 – Hearing Loss Prevention Program
    Reclamation Safety and Health Standards May 2020 Section 31: Hearing Loss Prevention Program Section 31 Hearing Loss Prevention Program 31.1 Scope This section establishes minimum requirements for a Reclamation Hearing Loss Prevention Program (HLPP) to ensure safety and occupational health hazards related to hearing are appropriately addressed. The HLPP applies to all employees working at or visiting facilities who are exposed to noise at or above 85 decibels, A scale (dBA), for an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) using a 3-dBA exchange rate. 31.2 General Requirements 31.2.1 3 dB Exchange Rate Reclamation shall use the more protective American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Value (TLV) exchange rate of 3 dB to be proactive in reducing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as shown in Table 31-1. TABLE 31-1. ACGIH 3 dB Exchange Rate Time to ACGIH 3 dB Reach 100% Exchange Rate Noise Dose Exposure Level 10 hours 84 8 hours 85 4 hours 88 2 hours 91 1 hour 94 30 min 97 15 min 100 31.2.2 Controls As feasible, engineering and administrative controls shall be implemented as the first line of defense when employees are exposed to sound levels greater than an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. Hearing protection devices (HPDs) shall be used when engineering and/or administrative controls fail to reduce the sound levels below the 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. 31.2.3 Exposure Limit An exposure of 85 dBA, based on an 8-hour TWA, shall be used when determining if personal dosimetry results have been exceeded.
    [Show full text]
  • NIOSH Efforts to Address Hazards in Construction
    NIOSH Efforts to Address Hazards in Construction G. Scott Earnest, Ph.D., P.E., C.S.P. Deputy Director, Office of Construction Safety and Health NORA Construction Coordinator National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Part of CDC Conduct research and make recommendations for the prevention of work-related injury and illness. Construction Program since 1990 In-house researchers External “National Construction Center” Academic research support congress.nsc.org Occupational Safety & Health Framework Research and Regulation/Enforcement Prevention Recommendations Department of Labor Department of (DOL) Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Mine Safety Occupational (CDC) and Health Safety and Health Administration Administration (MSHA) (OSHA) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) congress.nsc.org NIOSH Facilities congress.nsc.org Education and Research Centers congress.nsc.org NIOSH Construction Program Mission To eliminate construction fatalities, injuries, and illnesses through a focused program of research and prevention Program Addresses All Types of Construction Buildings-Skyscrapers Specialty Trades Buildings-Homes Heavy and Civil Construction Program Structure and Focus NIOSH Construction Safety and Health Program Intramural National Extramural Research Construction Investigator- Center Basic Research initiated Grants Surveillance Innovative Ideas Methods Research Industry Characterization Opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Are Quiet Products an Advantage for Manufacturers? Industry Experience in the United States
    BUY QUIET 2016 Are quiet products an advantage for manufacturers? Industry Experience in the United States Robert D. Hellweg, Jr., Hellweg Acoustics George C. Maling, Jr., INCE/USA Hamburg, Germany August 25, 2016 Outline – American Experience • Introduction • Two Technology for a Quieter America (TQA) NAE sponsored workshops • Why do manufacturers design quieter products ? • Laws and regulations • Lawsuits • Corporate Buy Quiet programs • Market demand • Opportunity • Specific product types • Government Buy Quiet Programs • Sources of product noise information • Summary 8/25/2016 2 2015 TQA NAE Workshop • “Engineering a Quieter America: Progress on Consumer and Industrial Product Noise Reduction” • A TQA Workshop and I-INCE Symposium sponsored by • INCE Foundation and Noise Control Foundation and • Hosted by US National Academy of Engineering • Washington, D.C., October 6-7, 2015 • 30 presentations on progress in noise control • Some of the material for this presentation is from the 2015 TQA report • Report is available at no cost at INCE/USA web page • inceusa.org/Reports/TQA_EngrQuieterAmerica_2016.pdf 8/25/2016 3 2014 TQA NAE Workshop • “Reducing Employee Noise Exposure in Manufacturing, Best Practices, Innovative Techniques, and the Workplace of the Future ” • A workshop sponsored by • INCE Foundation, Noise Control Foundation, and the National Institute of Occupational Safety and • Hosted by US National Academy of Engineering • Washington, D.C., February 19 – 20, 2014 • 27 presentations • Some of the material for this presentation is from the 2014 TQA report • Report is available at no cost at INCE/USA web page • http://inceusa.org/Reports/TQA_EmployeeExposureMfg_2016.pdf 8/25/2016 4 Why do Manufacturers design quiet products? (based on Olvera et.al.
    [Show full text]
  • [All Items in Brackets Are Meant to Be Instructional
    JPRJPR No.No. XXXX.X JSC Safety and Health Requirements 1700.1L Effective Date: 12/20/2018 Expiration Date: 12/20/2023 Expiration Date: [Leave Blank] Page Number Page 7.1-1 of 6 Chapter 7.1 Hearing Conservation This could be you . A worker didn’t think it was important to use hearing protection while working with equipment that produced high levels of noise and usually “forgot” to wear any hearing protective devices. He eventually noticed conversations seemed quite muffled and unclear, and that he had an annoying ringing in his ears. He then learned his hearing problem was permanent and could not be improved with surgery or medication. 7.1.1 Applicability of this chapter You are required to follow this chapter if you work in a designated hazardous noise area or an area having a hazardous noise source, such as the flight line at Ellington Field or machines in a sheet metal shop. 7.1.2 What this chapter covers This chapter covers the minimum requirements for JSC’s Hearing Conservation Program (HCP). It discusses JSC’s efforts to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among employees who are exposed to hazardous noise while working at this Center. JSC managers, supervisors, and employees share responsibilities for meeting these requirements. 7.1.3 Policy 7.1.3.1 These documents govern JSC’s hearing conservation program: a. NPR 1800.1, Chapter 4 describes the general requirements and provisions of NASA’s HCP. b. 29 CFR 1910.95, “Occupational Noise Exposure,” and its appendices describe the Occupational Safety and Health Association’s (OSHA) hearing conservation standards.
    [Show full text]
  • GPR 1820.1B APPROVED by Signature: Original Signed by EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2014 NAME: Judith N
    Goddard Procedural Requirements (GPR) DIRECTIVE NO. GPR 1820.1B APPROVED BY Signature: Original Signed By EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2014 NAME: Judith N. Bruner EXPIRATION DATE: May 16, 2020 TITLE: Director, Safety and Mission Assurance COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY Responsible Office: 350 / Occupational Safety & Health (OS&H) Division Title: Hearing Conservation Program PREFACE P.1 PURPOSE This directive defines the requirements that constitute the Hearing Conservation Program at the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) to prevent noise-induced hearing loss. P.2 APPLICABILITY This directive applies to all GSFC civil service employees. GSFC contractors, tenant organizations, grantees, clubs, and other organizations operating under the auspices of GSFC, or on GSFC property, shall administer their own hearing conservation programs that meet the requirements of NPR 1800.1 and Sections 2 and 3 of this GPR. P.3 AUTHORITY a. NPD 1800.2, NASA Occupational Health Program; and b. NPR 1800.1, NASA Occupational Health Program Procedures. P.4 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS a. 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.95, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Occupational Noise Exposure; b. 29 CFR 1904.10, OSHA Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illness; c. GPR 1840.2, Industrial Hygiene Program; d. GPR 8621.4, GSFC Mishap Preparedness and Contingency Plan; e. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard S1.4 Specification for Sound Level Meters; f. ANSI Standard S1.25 Specification for Personal Noise Dosimeters; g. ANSI Standard S3.1-1999 Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms; h. ANSI Standard S3.6-1969 Specification for Audiometers; i. NASA Form 1707, Special Approvals and Affirmations of Requisitions; j.
    [Show full text]