DOCSLIB.ORG

Three Locks Golf Course

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Three Locks Golf Course LANDSCAPE & VISUAL ASSESSMENT THREE LOCKS GOLF COURSE GREAT BRICKHILL, MILTON KEYNES BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DECEMBER 2020 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment December 2020 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Methodology 3 Planning Policy Context 4 The Development Proposals 5 Landscape Baseline 6 Landscape Effects 7 Visual Baseline 8 Visual Effects 9 Landscape Strategy Recommendations 10 Summary and Conclusion LIST OF LVIA PLANS Plan 1 Location Plan 2 Aerial Photograph: Detailed Area Plan 3 Topography Plan 4 Landscape Character Plan 5 Landscape Designations: Detailed Area Plan 6 Zone of Theoretical Visibility: Detailed Area Plan 7 Zone of Theoretical Visibility, Visual Barriers and PROW’s: Detailed Area Plan 8 Viewpoints Plan: Wider Context Plan 9 Viewpoints Plan: Site Plan 10 Landscape Strategy Plan APPENDICES A Viewpoint Photographs B Site Photographs C Criteria for Sensitivity, Magnitude and Significance Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. This Three Locks Golf Course Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (the LVIA) contributes to the 'appraisal' of development proposals for the change of use of land in the North central part of the golf course to accommodate the siting of 119 holiday use only luxury lodges and static caravans, together with ancillary landscape, access, drainage and engineering works. 1.2. The assessment is in accordance with the latest best practice guidance contained in the (non- prescriptive) Third Edition of Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA 3): Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment 2013. 1.3. The emphasis on likely significant effects focusses on an approach that is proportional to the scale of the project being assessed and the nature of its likely effects. 1.4. We deal with and clearly distinguish between the assessment of landscape effects (dealing with changes to the landscape as a resource), and the assessment of visual effects, dealing with changes in views and visual amenity. 1.5. H2 Landscape Planning Partnership were commissioned in June 2020 to prepare an LVIA and develop a masterplan based on its findings. The Site and Proposals: Summary 1.6. The site forms part of the Three Locks Golf Course which occupies is amorphous shaped parcel of land covering 43.414Ha to the East of the Grand Union Canal, and extending Northeast to within 750m of the village of Great Brickhill. The course is divided into two unequal parts – a larger area of low-lying flat land in the floodplain of the River Ouzel to the West, and the rising, undulating land of the valley side to the East of the car park and clubhouse. 1.7. The Existing parkland golf course is set in a mature and well-established landscape surrounded, subdivided and dominated by (largely coniferous and evergreen) woodland plantations and tree belts with a high percentage of coniferous and evergreen species, ponds, grassed and planted earth bunds, and strong boundary hedgerows. 1.8. The area proposed for development (15.45Ha) is in the western (lower-lying) part of the course, at its northern edge, and it is surrounded by the course on three sides - to the West, South and East. The northern boundary faces open agricultural land. The course will be reduced from 18 holes to 9 Holes, with 3 additional holes for occasional use 1.9. The proposals include the replacement of 6 golf holes (Holes 9 – 14) in the North/central part of the site with 119 luxury holiday lodges and static caravans arranged along the former fairways), retaining all of the existing woodland plantations, all of the ponds, all of the existing boundary trees and hedgerows and almost all of the other trees as open space for recreation and amenity. 1.10. The structure of the existing woodland plantations is to be improved by a phased removal of alien species and by the introduction of native species trees, shrubs and ground plants for biodiversity, screening and amenity value. Additional ponds with marginal and aquatic planting, and wildflower meadows will be created. Additional landscape infrastructure Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire planting will further screen the development by reinforcing the existing cover provided by boundary vegetation and tree belts between the fairways, particularly to the northern and western boundaries of the development area. A sewage treatment plant will be incorporated. 1.11. Existing vegetation will be retained at every opportunity as the core of landscape infrastructure to provide amenity for the site, and to help assimilate the development into the landscape. 1.12. The lodges will be clad using muted, recessive, landscape-led colours under dark non reflective roofs, and the tracks will use low key natural surfacing materials with hidden kerbs. 1.13. An environmentally sensitive lighting strategy will be employed to minimize light spill and disturbance to wildlife and neighbouring properties. 1.14. The remainder of the golf course will be reconfigured as a 9 hole golf course, with three additional alternate holes. The clubhouse will be refurbished to act as a central -facilities building for both the holiday park and the golf course. 1.15. Access will be via the existing primary golf course access, and then via a new access track along the western side of the planted bund defining the western side of the car park. 1.16. The location of the proposed development and its relationship to the remainder of the golf course is shown on Plan 10: Landscape Strategy. 1.17. The site is described in more detail in Section 4. 1.18. The project is described as ‘change of use for the siting of 119no Holiday use only luxury lodges and static caravans together with ancillary landscaping, access, drainage and engineering works.’ Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire 2. METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH 2.1. The assessment is in accordance with the latest best practice guidance contained in the (non- prescriptive) Third Edition of Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (GLVIA): Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment 2013. 2.2. Our approach to the LVIA process, and the judgements reached, have been the subject to peer and professional scrutiny through the application and appeal processes and have been found by peers, Council Officers and Planning Inspectors to be robust and rigorous. 2.3. This LVIA has been prepared by a Director of the company – a Chartered Member of the Landscape Institute with over 40 years experience as a Landscape Architect and Landscape Planner, supported by a Chartered Landscape Architect with experience from working in private practice for a number of years. 2.4. The Study Area incorporates the Site and the wider area over which the proposals may have an influence, determined through the visual mapping exercise which is described below. This is pertinent in the analysis of visual effects, landscape value and landscape effects. 2.5. Some matters, such as the description of the landscape character, will address the wider area including that land outside of the Study Area. This illustrates the relevance of wider analysis, but the assessment will return to those matters which relate to the Site and the relevant context. The Issue of Significance 2.6. The assessment contained within this section identifies any potentially significant effects that the Proposed Development may have upon the landscape or visual resource. 2.7. Landscape is defined by the European Landscape Convention, 2000 (ELC) as: “…an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors” (Page 4, Article 1 – Definitions, paragraph a).” 2.8. This definition applies to all urban and urban fringe landscapes, towns, villages and rural areas. It applies to ordinary or degraded landscape as well as those that are outstanding or protected. 2.9. In this context, the appraisal process considers the landscape and visual effects in an objective and systematic manner, whilst recognising the perceptual and therefore subjective response to the landscape. 2.10. It is important to understand and acknowledge that GLVIA, at paragraph 3.33, recognises that it is not essential to establish a series of thresholds of different levels of significance. The simple point is about making clear judgements as to whether the effects are significant or not significant. Notably the word ‘harm’ is not contained in the GLVIA, any judgements on ‘harm’ are planning judgements made and would be addressed in the appropriate forum, in this instance the planning process. 2.11. The emphasis on likely significant effects focusses on an approach that is proportional to the scale of the project being assessed and the nature of its likely effects. Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Lodge Development at Three Locks Golf Course, Great Brickhill, Buckinghamshire 2.12. In relation to this point and using the levels of significance set out in Appendix C for the purposes of this report, a significant effect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY
    Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY 2017 34. Park Royal Transport Strategy Document Title Park Royal Transport Strategy Lead Author Steer Davies Gleave Purpose of the Study Strategic assessment of the existing transport provision in Park Royal, the impact of the planned future growth and identification of the transport interventions required to mitigate those impacts. Key outputs • A review of the existing performance of transport modes in Park Royal • Analysis of future demand in Park Royal and its impact on the transport modes • Identification of six packages of interventions required to improve existing performance and to mitigate the impact of future demand on transport modes. Key recommendations Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relations to other Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help studies local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relevant Local Plan • Policy SP6 (Places and Destinations) and Policy SP7 (Connecting People and Places) Policies and Chapters • Place policies P4 (Park Royal West), P5 (Old Park Royal), P6 (Park Royal Centre), P7 (North Acton and Acton Wells), P8 (Old Oak Lane and Old Oak Common Lane) and P9 (Channel Gate) • All transport chapter policies Park Royal Transport Strategy Final Report January 2016 TfL and OPDC Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Current public realm in centre of Park Royal Prepared by: Prepared for: Park Royal Transport Strategy Steer Davies Gleave TfL and OPDC Final Report 28-32 Upper Ground Windsor House / Union Street - London January 2016 London SE1 9PD +44 20 7910 5000 TfL and OPDC www.steerdaviesgleave.com Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for TfL and OPDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Dacorum Borough Green Infrastructure Plan - Final Report
    DACORUM BOROUGH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN - FINAL REPORT Prepared for Dacorum Borough Council by Land Use Consultants March 2011 www.landuse.co.uk LUC SERVICES Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design 43 Chalton Street 14 Great George Street 37 Otago Street 28 Stafford Street London NW1 1JD Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow G12 8JJ Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Tel: 0117 929 1997 Tel: 0141 334 9595 Tel: 0131 202 1616 Fax: 020 7383 4798 Fax: 0117 929 1998 Fax: 0141 334 7789 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Version Issued by: Approved by: Andrew Tempany Kate Ahern Senior Landscape FINAL Principal-in-Charge Architect 24th March 2011 24th March 2011 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 What is green infrastructure?..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Benefits and relevance of the green infrastructure approach to Dacorum ..................................................................................................................................... 3 The green infrastructure planning process – a summary..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Core Areas of Work
    Formatted APPENDIX A - REPORT ON CORE AREAS OF WORK Carriageway Resurfacing Programme 1. Luton‟s highway network is an essential communication link that serves almost everyone everyday of the week and for a wide variety of reasons from simply visiting friends and relatives to vital business deliveries. Roads are an extremely valuable asset and in Luton their Gross Replacement Value is currently £470.25m. 2. In 2011/12 we delivered 33 resurfacing schemes and spent c. £1,500,000 of capital and revenue funding. However, with another severe winter in 2010/11 many roads had deteriorated further with the long period of freeze/thaw leading to the accelerated break- up of carriageway surfaces, with extensive cracking, crazing and potholes. 3. In addition in March 2011 the Department for Transport allocated £248,006 of Winter Pothole Funding to LBC following severe winter weather. This was used for large area road patching with over 28 roads treated. 4. Weather predictions for future years indicate an increasing trend for more exceptional weather conditions resulting in further pressure on already reducing maintenance budgets. Highway maintenance is increasingly a matter of managing the deterioration of assets. 5. The classified road (A, B & C roads) network is assessed annually using nationally developed criteria and the unclassified network is assessed every two years. Figures supplied to government show that we are currently only spending half of what would be required to maintain Luton‟s roads in their current condition. 361 resurfacing schemes have been identified following carriageway condition surveys of the road network. 6. Based upon results of the assessments, and referrals from area Highway Inspectors, Highway Services has developed a programme of work for carriageways which need immediate and significant improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Northampton Local Plan Part 2 Appendices
    Northampton Borough Council Sustainability Appraisal for Northampton Local Plan Part 2 Appendices Final report Prepared by LUC June 2020 Northampton Borough Council Sustainability Appraisal for Northampton Local Plan Part 2 Appendices Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. DRAFT FOR CLIENT REVIEW – J. Pearson J. Pearson QA to be 18.05.2020 NOT FOR ISSUE (Updated as a completed in S. Temple result of new/revised site parallel with allocations and policies since N. Collins client review, Proposed Submission Round 1) prior to E. Hynes consultation L. Meldrum E. Lendak C. Green 2. PROPOSED SUBMISSION J. Pearson J. Pearson J. Owen 16.06.2020 ROUND 2 - Final S. Temple E. Lendak C. Green Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents SA for Northampton Local Plan Part 2 (Proposed Submission Rnd 2) June 2020 Contents Table C.3: Responses to consultation comments on September 2017 SA of Local Plan Part 2 Site Options paper C-19 Appendix A Table C.4: Regulation 19 Round 1 Consultation Review of other relevant policies, plans, Responses Relating to the Sustainability Appraisal C-25 and programmes A-1 Table E.1: Assessment criteria for
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy
    DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy July 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 8 3. Blue-Green Infrastructure Priorities and Principles 18 4. National and Local Planning Policies 23 5. Regional and Local Green Infrastructure Strategies 28 6. Existing Blue-Green Infrastructure Assets 38 7. Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategic Networks 62 8. Ecological Networks 71 9. Synergies between Ecological and the Blue-Green Infrastructure Network 89 Appendix A: BGI Corridor Summaries 92 Appendix B: Biodiversity Connectivity Maps 132 Appendix C: Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 136 Appendix D: Natural Environment Assets 140 Appendix D1: Sites of Special Scientific Interest 141 Appendix D2: Local Nature Reserves 142 Appendix D3: Local Wildlife Sites 145 Appendix D4: Non-Designated 159 1 Appendix E: Recreational Assets 169 Appendix E1: Children’s and Young People’s Play Space 170 Appendix E2: Outdoor Sports Pitches 178 Appendix E3: Parks and Gardens 192 Appendix E4: Allotments 199 Appendix F: Blue Infrastructure 203 Appendix F1: Watercourses 204 2 1. Introduction Objectives of the Strategy 1.1 The Greater Nottingham authorities have determined that a Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) Strategy is required to inform both the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan (Local Plan Part 1) and the development of policies and allocations within it. This strategic plan is being prepared by Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council. It will also inform the Erewash Local Plan which is being progressed separately. For the purposes of this BGI Strategy the area comprises the administrative areas of: Broxtowe Borough Council; Erewash Borough Council; Gedling Borough Council; Nottingham City Council; and Rushcliffe Borough Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Map and Info for Erewash Valley Trail.Pdf
    just down stream of Moorbridge Lane. Moorbridge of stream down just Sandiacre next to the Erewash Canal Canal Erewash the to next Sandiacre throughout the valley but notably at at notably but valley the throughout and hollows) meadows can be found found be can meadows hollows) and of ancient ridge and furrow (humps (humps furrow and ridge ancient of further information. further grassland and water meadows. Evidence Evidence meadows. water and grassland Erewash Valley Trail website for for website Trail Valley Erewash for its agricultural value particularly its its particularly value agricultural its for of events throughout the year, see see year, the throughout events of The valley has long been recognised recognised been long has valley The The valley hosts a range range a hosts valley The destinations. destinations. the 14th Century. 14th the and are developing as national tourist tourist national as developing are and Strelley Priory, perhaps as far back as as back far as perhaps Priory, Strelley Museum provide local tourism opportunities opportunities tourism local provide Museum monasteries such as Dale Abbey and and Abbey Dale as such monasteries Nature Reserve, DH Lawrence Birthplace and Erewash Erewash and Birthplace Lawrence DH Reserve, Nature part of a network of routes linking linking routes of network a of part Attractions such as Shipley Country Park, Attenborough Attenborough Park, Country Shipley as such Attractions stone slabbed causeway that formed formed that causeway slabbed stone ‘Monks Way’, a a Way’, ‘Monks informal policing of the area. the of policing informal Stapleford. close to the the to close are major users often providing important feedback and and feedback important providing often users major are The Saxon Cross in in Cross Saxon The building lies lies building jogging and bird watching are very popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham City Council Delegated Decision
    Nottingham City Council Delegated Decision Reference Number: 3758 Author: John Edwin Bann Department: Development and Growth Contact: John Edwin Bann (Job Title: Cycling & Roadspace Transformation Manager, Email: [email protected], Phone: 0115 87 64014) Subject: National Cycle Route 6 improvement in Nottingham Total Value: £986,000 (Type: Capital) Decision Being Taken: 1) To spend funding from the Department of Transport to improve a section of the national Cycle Network NCN6 in Nottingham. The funding is from the National Cycling Network improvement programme via Sustrans (£486,000) and the Transforming Cities Fund Tranche 1 (£500,000). 2) To amend the Capital Programme to reflect this spending. Reference Number: 3758, Page No: 1 of 4 Reasons for the Decision(s) For a number of years, cyclists have been able to use the footway alongside the Nottingham Ring Road to connect between residential areas, employment sites, two major hospitals, the University of Nottingham and other educational establishments. The paths were either shared with pedestrians or segregated by a white line. From 2015 onwards, a series of improvements have been made to the path for pedestrians and cyclists, in particular. These have been funded from a variety of sources, including the Department for Transport's (DfT) Local Transport Plan major scheme allocation, the D2N2 Local Enterprise Partnership, and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affair's early intervention air quality programme. The most significant and innovatory change has been to give cyclists priority over motorists at more than 30 side road junctions. This has led to a 30%+ increase in cyclist usage of this route to over 500 a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D. Landscape and Visual
    Smart Motorways Programme M1 13 - 16 Environmental Study Report – Appendix D Appendix D. Landscape and visual D.1. Visual effects schedule Table D-1 Visual effects schedule (refer to drawing HA549348-AMAR-ELS-SWI-DR-YE-000039 for viewpoint locations) Viewpoint Current Key representative Approx. Existing view and sensitivity Magnitude of impact and significance of Magnitude of impact and significance No. from Viewpoint No viewpoint dist. to (refer to criteria provided in section 4.3.4 of effect Winter Year 1 of effect Summer Year 15 Scoping (HA549348- description Scheme the Scoping Report HA549348-AMAR-EGN- (refer to criteria provided in section 4.3.4 of the (refer to criteria provided in section 4.3.4 Report AMAR-ELS- SWI-RP-YE-000100) Scoping Report) of the Scoping Report) SWI-DR-YE- 000039). 2 25 Looking south-west 500m Middle distance views of traffic and signage Vegetation loss would slightly exacerbate Established mitigation planting would from the Nene Way infrastructure on the M1 across farmland and views of traffic on embankment. Two proposed filter views of traffic on embankment at Willow View, filtered through intervening vegetation. The gantries and four ROTTMS would be visible on between chainages 37200 and 38350 Kislingbury. M1 corridor is elevated and is noticeable and the embankment, but they would replace two since it would provide the same level of partially visible along the full extent of the existing signs and be set within the context of screening that the existing vegetation Represents views of horizon line. the existing highway infrastructure. It is does at the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Challenge -- Response from Cambridgeshire Campaign for Better Transport
    A14 Challenge -- Response from Cambridgeshire Campaign for Better Transport Section 1 -- Introduction Cambridgeshire Campaign for Better Transport is a voluntary campaigning group. Our function is to support the vision of the Campaign for Better Transport (CfBT), which is described on their website (see Appendix 1), and try to apply it in a local context within Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. We have no formal association with CfBT, but work closely with them on many issues, one of them being our responses to the A14 Challenge. While this response is based on that of CfBT, we have taken the opportunity to expand on certain matters of detail. We welcome the Government decision to reconsider the A14 upgrade proposals, which we objected to on several grounds: o adverse effects of induced traffic o continued severance in many locations o lack of provision for public transport users o many missed opportunities. In particular we objected to the widening of the Cambridge Northern Bypass, the inclusion of dual local roads between Girton and Bar Hill, and the decision to make the whole route dual 3 lane, and we hope that these measures will not resurface following this consultation. We therefore welcome the opportunity to contribute to the A14 Challenge. We start by summarising the challenges identified in the A14 study document: 1. Loss of productive time due to congestion, both on the A14 itself and on other roads 2. Supporting growth of the Greater Cambridge area 3. Accessing labour markets in Cambridge and Huntingdon 4. Welfare impacts from the effects of congestion on drivers, which limit the attractiveness of the area 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Network Rail East West Rail Phase 2 Order Scheme
    The Network Rail (East West Rail Phase 2) Order THE NETWORK RAIL EAST WEST RAIL PHASE 2 ORDER SCHEME SCOPING REPORT Document Reference EWR2-ENV-REP-PBL- 200002 Author Network Rail Date June 2015 Date of revision and June 2015 revision number 1.3 The Network Rail (East West Rail Phase 2) Order Scheme Scoping Report Document control Sally Walker and Checked by Prepared by Marcus Wood Catherine Sugden (technical) Checked by Approved by Stephen Cain Chris Lawrence (quality assurance) The Network Rail (East West Rail Phase 2) Order Scheme Scoping Report CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ I GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) .......................... 2 1.3 Purpose of the Document ............................................................................. 2 2. THE SCHEME ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Scheme Context ........................................................................................... 4 2.2 Needs and Benefits .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East of England Regional Landscape Framework
    East of England Regional Landscape Framework Urban Landscape Typology Final Report Alison Farmer Associates December 2009 1 East of England Regional Urban Landscape 1.0 Method statement Aim: The aim of developing a regional urban landscape typology for the East of England is to articulate the broad variety of towns/cities found within the region and the character of the landscape within the urban fabric of each settlement. The purpose of the exercise is to provide an overview of landscape character in settlements which can be used as a starting point to informing future assessments such as Green Infrastructure (GI) strategies and decision making on growth, both in terms of the extension to existing settlements as well as the creation of new settlements. It should be noted that the scope of this work is limited and that the typology descriptions which have been developed are succinct and brief and do not replace the need for more detailed townscape assessment. Importantly this work has focused principally on the landscape character of settlements however it is openly acknowledged that these settlements have an important built character and that the combination of built and landscape elements leads to an overall understanding of a settlement’s sense of place. Approach: A total of 28 settlements were initially identified for study. These were first selected based on the urban areas identified when mapping LDUs for the regional landscape framework. These settlements were then cross referenced with the RSS and any further settlements which were missed, and likely to experience change, were also identified for study.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Hanslope
    A strategy for Hanslope Prepared by a team of volunteers from the Parish in 2008/2009 Published in May 2009 This Parish Plan is dedicated to Margaret Adams who was a founder member of the Parish Plan team but who died just prior to its completion. Hanslope Parish Plan Page 1 of 44 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 2 Hanslope – our Village ............................................................................................. 4 3 Environment ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Village Appearance .......................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 General Appearance ................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Unsightly Areas ....................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Dog and Horse Fouling ........................................................................... 11 3.1.4 Hedgerows and Pathways ...................................................................... 12 3.1.5 Vandalism ............................................................................................... 13 3.2 Green Issues ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]