The Structure and Function of the Caudal Lamellae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Structure and Function of the Caudal Lamellae THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF THE CAUDAL LAMELLAE OF THE DAMSELFLY Pvrrhosoma nymphula (SULZER) [ODONATA:ZYGOPTERA]. By David Wilson Brown. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Zoology University of Glasgow July 1995 ProQuest Number: 11007806 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007806 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ^Tr:; /03c?? Gq / GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Table of contents Page number List of tables I List of plates III List of figures V Acknowledgements vm Summary IX Chapter 1 - General introduction 1 Chapter 2 - The occurrence and effects of caudal lamellar loss in a population of R nymphula 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Materials and methods 16 2.3 Results 21 2.4 Discussion 37 Chapter 3 - Morphology of the caudal lamellae of P. nymphula. 3.1 Introduction 51 3.2 Materials and methods 69 3.3 Results 73 3.4 Discussion 88 Chapter 4 - Physiology of the Caudal lamellae of R nymphula. 4.1 Introduction 99 4.2 Materials and methods 114 4.3 Results 124 4.4 Discussion 131 Chapter 5 The role of lamellae during aggresive encounters between larvae. 5.1 Introduction 142 5.2 Materials and methods 150 5.3 Results 154 5.4 Discussion 160 Chapter 6 - General discussion 165 Appendices Appendix 1 172 Appendix 2 173 Appendix 3 174 Appendix 4 Following page 174 Appendix 5 Following page 174 Appendix 6 175 References 177 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Summary of seasonal variation in size of larval R nymphula collected during 1984/1985. 2.2 Correlation between total larval length, head dimensions and metathoracic wing pad length of P. nymphula larvae collected during 1984/1985. 2.3 Summary of seasonal variation in measured dimensions of larval P. nymphula collected during 1987/1988. 2.4 Correlation between total larval length, head dimensions and metathoracic wing pad length of P. nymphula larvae collected during 1987/1988. 2.5 Summary of seasonal variation in density of larval R nymphula at each sampling station during 1987/1988. 2.6 Kruskal-Wallace analysis of variance on seasonal change in the mean density of R nymphula larvae and habitat type. 2.7 Cohort sex ratios and mean cohort sizes for R nymphula larvae collected during 1987/1988. 2.8 Sex and mean total length of larval P. nymphula greater than 6mm total length. 2.9 Analysis of variance; total length of larvae by larval sex and sampling date. 2.10 Frequency of lamellar damage, larval dimensions during 1987/1988 sampling. 2.11 Lamellar damage and sex of P. nymphula larvae over 6mm total length, larvae collected during 1987/1988. 2.12 Mean density of larvae with and without lamellar damage. 2.13 Analysis of variance, total length of larvae by Sex, sampling season, sampling station and presence of lamellae. 2.14 Analysis of variance; total length of larvae by collection season, sampling station and presence of lamellar damage. 2.15 Mean total length of P. nymphula larvae with and without 32 lamellar damage in each habitat type. 2.16 Mean values of pH and Conductivity for the Ross burn 35 during 1984/1985 and 1987/1988 sampling. 2.17 Oxygen concentration at different depths from core samples taken 35 during summer and winter at sampling station 3. 3.1 Comparative morphology of insect tracheal gills. 75 4.1 Mean respiration rate of L+ and L- P. nymphula larvae according 126 to weight category and mean experimental oxygen concentration. 4.2 Regression formulae and oxygen critical point estimates 126 4.3 Correlation and regression of Logio S.O.R. on Logio wet 128 weight. 4.4 Results of analysis of covariance on regressions of Logio S.O.R. 128 on Logio wet weight for larvae with and without lamellae. 5.1 Perch occupancy by larvae with and without lamellae 154 5.2 Frequency and type of change in ownership of perch occupants 154 during experiments. 5.3 Frequency and type of behaviour showed by larvae during experiments. 156 5.4 Frequency of aggressive displays shown by larvae 156 5.5 Frequency of occasions when perch occupant larva was challenged 156 by the intruder. II LIST OF PLATES Plate Following Page 2.1 The sampling site, Ross Bum, Stirlingshire. 16 3.1 Final instar larva of P. nymphula (X10). 73 3.2 Transverse section (T.S.) through the prenodal region of a median 73 lamella from an instar 4 larva of P. nymphula (XI00). 3.3 T. S. through the thickened midrib region of a lateral lamella 73 of a final instar R nymphula larva. 3.4 T.E.M. of a T.S. through the postnodal region of a lamella from 73 a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X4690). 3.5 T.E.M. of a T.S. through a lateral lamella of a final instar 73 larvae of R nymphula (X76496). 3.6 T.E.M. of a T.S. of the prenodal region of a lateral lamella of a 75 final instar larva of R nymphula (XI0868). 3.7 T.E.M. of a T.S. through the cuticle of the abdomen of a final 75 instar larva of P. nymphula (XI0032). 3.8 Transmission electron micrograph (T.E.M.) of a T.S. through the 75 postnodal region of a median lamella from a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X8778). 3.9 Scanning electron micrograph (S.E.M.) of a lateral lamella from an 76 instar 5 larva of P. nymphula (X49). 3.10 S.E.M. of the nodal region of a median lamella from a final instar 76 larva of R nymphula (X162). 3.11 T.S. of a functional lateral spiracle of a final instar P. nymphula 77 larva (X100). 3.12 T.E.M. through the hypodermis of the prenodal region of a lateral 77 lamella from a final instar larva of R nymphula (X62829). 3.13 T.E.M. of a T.S. through the prenodal region of a lateral lamella of 77 a final instar larva of P.nymphula (X33509). 3.14 S.E.M. of the abdomen and lamellae of a final instar larva 83 of P. nymphula (X93). 3.15 Longitudonal section (L.S.) through the breaking joint of a lateral 83 lamella from a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X200). IE 3.16 S.E.M. of the surface of a freshly autotomised breaking 83 joint of a lateral lamella from a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X462). 3.17 S.E.M. of the surface of a lateral lamellar breaking joint 83 following autotomv from a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X753). 3.18‘T.S. through the fracture point of the breaking joint of a median 83 lamella from a final instar larva of P. nymphula 1X200). 3.19 T.S. through the median lamellar tracheal trunks at the point 83 of fracture of the breaking ioint of a final instar larva of P. nymphula. 3.20 T.S. of the rectum of a final instar P. nymphula larva showing 85 thickened epithelial cells (X200). 3.21 S.E.M. of the dorsal edge of a lateral lamella from a final 86 instar larva of P. nymphula (X816). 3.22 S.E.M. of a sensory hair on a median lamella from a final 86 instar larva of P. nymphula (X1920). 3.23 S.E.M. of a sensory pit on the postnodal region of a median 86 lamella from a final instar larva of P. nymphula (X1920). IV LIST OF FIGURES Figure Following Page 2.1 Plan of Ross Bum sampling site showing sampling station 1 to 5. 16 2.2 Diagram of a final instar larva of P. nymphula showing dimensions 19 measured. 2.3 Diagram of a junior instar larvae of P. nymphula. 19 2.4 Total length plotted against head width at eyes forP. nymphula 21 larvae from 1984/1985 sampling period. 2.5 Total length plotted against mesothoracic wing pad length for 21 P. nymphula larvae collected during 1984/1985 sampling. 2.6 Size frequency histograms for total length of larvae 23 collected during 1987/1988 sampling. 2.7 Seasonal variation in mean cohort size 23 2.8 Seasonal variation in total density of larvae 24 2.9 Seasonal variation in the percentage of P.nymphula larvae 27 in each age class with lamellar damage during 1987/1988 sampling. 2.10 The frequncy of lamellar damage and larval density 27 2.11 Comparison of cohort density and frequency of lamellar damage 27 2.12 The frequency of lamellar damage and larval density 29 according habitat type, summmer 1988. 2.13 The frequency of lamellar damage and larval density according 29 to habitat type, winter samples. 2.14 Growth rate of larvae with and without lamellae during summer 1987. 34 2.15 The size difference between the mean sizes of larvae with and 34 without lamellae in each emergence group. 2.16 The size difference between the mean sizes of larvae with and 34 without lamellae and larval density accoording to emergence group.
Recommended publications
  • The Classification and Diversity of Dragonflies and Damselflies (Odonata)*
    Zootaxa 3703 (1): 036–045 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F5D2E03-6ABE-4425-9713-99888C0C8690 The classification and diversity of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata)* KLAAS-DOUWE B. DIJKSTRA1, GÜNTER BECHLY2, SETH M. BYBEE3, RORY A. DOW1, HENRI J. DUMONT4, GÜNTHER FLECK5, ROSSER W. GARRISON6, MATTI HÄMÄLÄINEN1, VINCENT J. KALKMAN1, HARUKI KARUBE7, MICHAEL L. MAY8, ALBERT G. ORR9, DENNIS R. PAULSON10, ANDREW C. REHN11, GÜNTHER THEISCHINGER12, JOHN W.H. TRUEMAN13, JAN VAN TOL1, NATALIA VON ELLENRIEDER6 & JESSICA WARE14 1Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, 401 WIDB, Provo, UT. 84602 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] 5France. E-mail: [email protected] 6Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, California Department of Food & Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832- 1448, USA. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 7Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, 499 Iryuda, Odawara, Kanagawa, 250-0031 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 8Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, Blake Hall, 93 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt
    Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental Myrna G. Ballentes :: Alma B. Mohagan :: Victor P. Gapud Maria Catherine P. Espallardo :: Myrna O. Zarcilla Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental Myrna G. Ballentes, Alma B. Mohagan, Victor P. Gapud Maria Catherine P. Espallardo, Myrna O. Zarcilla Biodiversity Research Programme (BRP) for Development in Mindanao: Focus on Mt. Malindang and Environs The Biodiversity Research Programme (BRP) for Development in Mindanao is a collaborative research programme on biodiversity management and conservation jointly undertaken by Filipino and Dutch researchers in Mt. Malindang and its environs, Misamis Occidental, Philippines. It is committed to undertake and promote participatory and interdisciplinary research that will promote sustainable use of biological resources, and effective decision-making on biodiversity conservation to improve livelihood and cultural opportunities. BRP aims to make biodiversity research more responsive to real-life problems and development needs of the local communities, by introducing a new mode of knowledge generation for biodiversity management and conservation, and to strengthen capacity for biodiversity research and decision-making by empowering the local research partners and other local stakeholders. Philippine Copyright 2006 by Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) Biodiversity Research Programme for Development in Mindanao: Focus on Mt. Malindang and Environs ISBN 971-560-125-1 Wildlife Gratuitous Permit No. 2005-01 for the collection of wild faunal specimens for taxonomic purposes, issued by DENR-Region X, Cagayan de Oro City on 4 January 2005. Any views presented in this publication are solely of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of SEARCA, SEAMEO, or any of the member governments of SEAMEO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damselfly and Dragonfly Watercolour Collection of Edmond
    International Journal of Odonatology, 2017 Vol. 20, No. 2, 79–112, https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2017.1330226 The damselfly and dragonfly watercolour collection of Edmond de Selys Longchamps: II Calopterygines, Cordulines, Gomphines and Aeschnines Karin Verspuia∗ and Marcel Th. Wasscherb aLingedijk 104, Tricht, the Netherlands; bMinstraat 15bis, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Received 3 March 2017; final version received 10 May 2017) In the nineteenth century Edmond de Selys Longchamps added watercolours, drawings and notes to his extensive collection of dragonfly and damselfly specimens. The majority of illustrations were exe- cuted by Selys and Guillaume Severin. The watercolour collection is currently part of the collection of the Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences in Brussels. This previously unpublished material has now been scanned and is accessible on the website of this institute. This article presents the part of the collection concerning the following sous-familles according to Selys: Calopterygines (currently superfamilies Calopterygoidea and Epiophlebioidea), Cordulines (currently superfamily Libelluloidea), Gomphines (currently superfamily Petaluroidea, Gomphoidea, Cordulegastroidea and Aeshnoidea) and Aeschnines (currently superfamily Aeshnoidea). This part consists of 750 watercolours, 64 drawings and 285 text sheets. Characteristics and subject matter of the sheets with illustrations and text are pre- sented. The majority (92%) of all sheets with illustrations have been associated with current species names (Calopteryines 268, Cordulines 109, Gomphines 268 and Aeschnines 111). We hope the digital images and documentation stress the value of the watercolour collection of Selys and promote it as a source for odonate research. Keywords: Odonata; taxonomy; Severin; Zygoptera; Anisozygoptera; Anisoptera; watercolours; draw- ings; aquarelles Introduction The watercolour collection of Selys Edmond Michel de Selys Longchamps (1813–1900) did important work in odonate classifi- cation and taxonomy (Wasscher & Dumont, 2013; Verspui & Wasscher, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Biology and Conservation Taxonomy
    Adv. Odonatol. 1: 293-302 December 31, 1982 Dragonflies in the Australian environment: taxonomy, biology and conservation J.A.L. Watson Division of Entomology, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia Australian fauna includes The dragonfly slightly more than 100 of and almost 200 of there endemic species Zygoptera Anisoptera; are two families and and of endemism at and one subfamily, a high degree generic specific levels. Gondwana elements make up at least 15% and perhaps as much as 40% of the fauna, whereas 40% are of northern origin, with a lower of endemism. of the southern breed in degree Most species perman- the in the ent flowing water, mainly along eastern seaboard, with some north, north-west and south-west. The northern dragonflies penetrate southern Australia variable the to a degree, principally along east coast. Adult the dragonflies occur throughout arid inland; most are opportun- istic None has wanderers. a drought-resistant larva, although drought- -resistant and terrestrial larvae occur elsewhere in Australia. The conser- vation of Australia Odonata involves problems arising from habitat des- truction or the alienation of fresh waters for human consumption or agri- culture. Pollution does not threaten any Australian species of dragonfly, it adults larvae although may affect local dragonfly faunas; and of appro- priately chosen species can serve to monitor water quality. INTRODUCTION The taxonomy of the Australian dragonflies is well established. Fabricius described the first known species, from material that Banks and Solander collected during their enforced stay at the Endeavour Australian River in 1770, during Cook’s voyage along the eastern coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Taxonomy of Megapodagrionidae with Emphasis on the Larval Gills (Odonata)
    Received 01 August 2009; revised and accepted 16 February 2010 Remarks on the taxonomy of Megapodagrionidae with emphasis on the larval gills (Odonata) 1 2 3 4 Vincent J. Kalkman , Chee Yen Choong , Albert G. Orr & Kai Schutte 1 National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. <[email protected]> 2 Centre for Insect Systematics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. <[email protected]> 3 CRC, Tropical Ecosystem Management, AES, Griffith University, Nathan, Q4111, Australia. <[email protected]> 4 Biozentrum Grinde! und Zoologisches Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Piatz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. <[email protected]> Key words: Odonata, dragonfly, Zygoptera, Megapodagrionidae, Pseudolestidae, taxonomy, larva. ABSTRACT A list of genera presently included in Megapodagrionidae and Pseudolestidae is pro­ vided, together with information on species for which the larva has been described. Based on the shape of the gills, the genera for which the larva is known can be ar­ ranged into four groups: (1) species with inflated sack-like gills with a terminal fila­ ment; (2) species with flat vertical gills; (3) species in which the outer gills in life form a tube folded around the median gill; (4) species with flat horizontal gills. The possible monophyly of these groups is discussed. It is noted that horizontal gills are not found in any other family of Zygoptera. Within the Megapodagrionidae the genera with horizontal gills are, with the exception of Dimeragrion, the only ones lacking setae on the shaft of the genital ligula. On the basis of these two characters it is suggested that this group is monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Odonata: Who They Are and What They Have Done for Us Lately: Classification and Ecosystem Services of Dragonflies
    insects Review Odonata: Who They Are and What They Have Done for Us Lately: Classification and Ecosystem Services of Dragonflies Michael L. May Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; [email protected] Received: 26 January 2019; Accepted: 22 February 2019; Published: 28 February 2019 Abstract: Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) are well-known but often poorly understood insects. Their phylogeny and classification have proved difficult to understand but, through use of modern morphological and molecular techniques, is becoming better understood and is discussed here. Although not considered to be of high economic importance, they do provide esthetic/spiritual benefits to humans, and may have some impact as predators of disease vectors and agricultural pests. In addition, their larvae are very important as intermediate or top predators in many aquatic ecosystems. More recently, they have been the objects of study that have yielded new information on the mechanics and control of insect flight. Keywords: damselfly; dragonfly; biomimetic technology; climate warming; ecological indicators; mosquito control; myth and art; phylogeny; predation 1. Introduction Dragonflies are insects that people notice. As adults they are large, diurnal, often colorful, and are swift, acrobatic fliers. They are sufficiently noticeable that they have received numerous folk names, for example, in North America, mosquito hawk, horse stinger, snake doctor, adderbolt, darning needle, among many others [1]. They have become embedded in folklore and mythology in many cultures (see below) and are the subjects of beautiful art and depressingly tacky shlock (whoever started the idea that odonates have curly antennae?!). 2. Classification Despite being so well known as a group, distinctions among species and even higher taxa often seem to be overlooked by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Studies of Odonata Population in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia
    TALENTA Conference Series: Agricultural & Natural Resources (ANR) PAPER – OPEN ACCESS Ecological Studies of Odonata Population in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia Author : Ameilia Zuliyanti Siregar DOI : 10.32734/anr.v1i1.93 Electronic ISSN : 2654-7023 Print ISSN : 2654-7015 Volume 1 Issue 2 – 2018 TALENTA Conference Series: Agricultural & Natural Resources (ANR) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Published under licence by TALENTA Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara ANR Conference Series 01 (2018), Page 034–041 TALENTA Conference Series Available online at https://talentaconfseries.usu.ac.id Ecological Studies of Odonata Population in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia Ameilia Zuliyanti Siregar aFaculty of Agrocotecnology, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan-20155, Indonesia [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Odonata is importants insect groups in the world. Ten ha rice field plot in three sites in Manik Rambung Rice Field (MRRF), Simalungun District, North of Sumatera (latitude: 2°53‘ 52.8"N and longitude: 99° 00‘24.4"E, about 90 km from Medan City at 594 - 602 masl) were recorded of Odonata population. The farmers have rice culture practices, combine with fish farming during season paddy planting. The comparison was conducted which nine stations of green Campus areas with purpossive randomsampling in a month (November, 1. 2011 until November, 28. 2011) using sweep net (400 µm mesh, 60cm x 90cm) which six swings started from 0900 to 1200 for collection of Odonata. The results were collected 445 individuals from sub-order Zygopteran and 892 individuals from sub order Anisoperan, 3 families, and 19 species of adults Odonata were identified IN MRRF.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Ancestral Introgression Shapes Evolutionary History of Dragonflies and Damselflies
    Copyedited by: YS MANUSCRIPT CATEGORY: Systematic Biology Syst. Biol. 0(0):1–22, 2021 © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syab063 Deep Ancestral Introgression Shapes Evolutionary History of Dragonflies and Damselflies ,∗ , ANTON SUVOROV1 ,CELINE SCORNAVACCA2 †,M.STANLEY FUJIMOTO3,PAUL BODILY4,MARK CLEMENT3,KEITH A. , , , , CRANDALL5,MICHAEL F. WHITING6 7,DANIEL R. SCHRIDER1 †, AND SETH M. BYBEE6 7 † 1Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; 2Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution Universiteì de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE CC 064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France; 3Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; 4Department of Computer Science, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA; 5Computational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; 6Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; and 7M.L. Bean Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA ∗ Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 Mason Farm Road, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syab063/6330770 by guest on 27 September 2021 NC 27599-7264, USA E-mail: [email protected] †Celine Scornavacca, Daniel R.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics, Evolution and Systematics of Holodonata with Special Focus on Wing Structure Evolution: Morphological, Molecular and Fossil Evidence
    PHYLOGENETICS, EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS OF HOLODONATA WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON WING STRUCTURE EVOLUTION: MORPHOLOGICAL, MOLECULAR AND FOSSIL EVIDENCE By SETH M. BYBEE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Seth M. Bybee 2 To my wife for her endless supply of support, encouragement and attention and my children for their never ending curiosity. To my parents for all their love and guidance and my siblings for their examples. To all those that gave me a chance. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to the long hours of dedicated help and support that I received from all those who served on my graduate committee. This project would not have been possible without their endless generosity, advice, and council. I am sincerely grateful to Dr. Alexandr Rasnitsyn and the paleoentomological staff at the Paleoentomological Institute, Dr. Andrew Ross at The Natural History Museum, and Dr. André Nel at le Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, who helped to make this research possible and who were superb hosts. Many thanks to Dr. David Grimaldi for his support, encouragement and insight into this research. Thanks to Dr. David Wahl for his help with optimizing the photographic equipment. This research was supported by grants from the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Explorers Club, the Systematic Association, the Entomological Society of America, and the Florida Entomological Society. The DNA component of this research was funded by NSF grants DEB 0120718, NSF DEB 0206505, NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program DBI-0139501, Brigham Young University's Office of Original Research and Creative Activities, and the Entomological Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrion 24(3) - July 2020
    Agrion 24(3) - July 2020 AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION PATRON: Professor Edward O. Wilson FRS, FRSE Volume 24, Number 3 July 2020 Secretary and Treasurer: W. Peter Brown, Hill House, Flag Hill, Great Bentley, Colchester CO7 8RE. Email: wda.secretary@gmail. com. Editors: Keith D.P. Wilson. 18 Chatsworth Road, Brighton, BN1 5DB, UK. Email: [email protected]. Graham T. Reels. 31 St Anne’s Close, Badger Farm, Winchester, SO22 4LQ, Hants, UK. Email: [email protected]. ISSN 1476-2552 Agrion 24(3) - July 2020 AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION AGRION is the Worldwide Dragonfly Association’s (WDA’s) newsletter, which is normally published twice a year in January and July. Occasionally a special issue may be produced, as was the case in May 2020 when a special issue was published in response to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. The WDA aims to advance public education and awareness by the promotion of the study and conservation of dragonflies (Odonata) and their natural habitats in all parts of the world. AGRION covers all aspects of WDA’s activities; it communicates facts and knowledge related to the study and conservation of dragonflies and is a forum for news and information exchange for members. AGRION is freely available for downloading from the WDA website at [https://worlddragonfly.org/about/agrion/]. WDA is a Registered Charity (Not-for-Profit Organization), Charity No. 1066039/0. A ‘pdf’ of the WDA’s Constitution and byelaws can be found at its website link at [https://worlddragonfly.org/about/]. ________________________________________________________________________________ Editor’s notes Keith Wilson [[email protected]] WDA Membership Control of the membership signing up and renewal process is now being handled by WDA directly from the WDA website.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrion Newsletter of the Worldwide Dragonfly Association
    AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION PATRON: Professor Edward O. Wilson FRS, FRSE Volume 12, Number 1 January 2008 Secretary: Linda Averill. 49 James Road, Kidderminster, Worcester, DY10 2TR, UK. Email: [email protected] Editors: Keith Wilson. 18 Chatsworth Road, Brighton, BN1 5DB, UK. Email: [email protected] Graham Reels. C-6-26 Fairview Park, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected] ISSN 1476-2552 AGRION NEWSLETTER OF THE WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION AGRION is Worldwide Dragonfly Association’s (WDA’s) newsletter, published twice a year, in January and July. The WDA aims to advance public education and awareness by the promotion of the study and conservation of dragonflies (Odonata) and their natural habitats in all parts of the world. AGRION covers all aspects of WDA’s activities; it communicates facts and knowledge related to the study and conservation of dragonflies and is a forum for news and information exchange for members. Members can download previous issues of AGRION from the WDA website at http://ecoevo.uvigo.es/WDA/dragonfly.htm. WDA is a Registered Charity (Not-for- Profit Organization), Charity No. 1066039/0. ________________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Keith Wilson [[email protected]] Firstly a big thank you and much praise to Jill Silsby, the outgoing Editor who has skillfully edited and produced AGRION for the past ten years, with great enthusiasm. Gordon Pritchard paid tribute to Jill in the last AGRION issue in his ‘Message from the President’, not only for all her editorial work but also for her many contributions to the WDA, which I won’t repeat here.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrugated Due to Longitudinals and Thickly Set and Pronounced, Can Be
    Odonatologica 17(4): 313-335 December I, 1988 Spines on the wing veins in Odonata. 1. Zygoptera M. D’Andrea andS. Carfi Dipartimento di Biologia animale e Genetica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via Romana 17, I-50125 Firenze, Italy Received October 5, 1987 / Revised and Accepted July 6, 1988 The wing veins of Zygoptera areprovided with spines which differ morphologically whetherthe and in according to vein is convexor concave, in relation to sex(typically Euphaeidae, Calopterygidae and Chlorocyphidae) and taxonomic position (distin- the and A guishing more primitive Calopterygoidea from Lestoidea Coenagrioidea. certain number ofvariations are constantly associated with the nodal and cubito-anal of while size related surface spaces the wings, appears to be partially to the area, wing chord and aspect ratio. INTRODUCTION In Odonata the wings are not smooth but corrugated due to longitudinals and which cross veins, are spinose on both the upperand lower surfaces. The presence of these spines, which are more or less thickly set and pronounced, can be noted slide of of folded. by attempting to a piece paper between a pair wings SEGUY (1959) noted that in the wings of Corduliaaenea "toutes les nervures sont epineuses”. HERTEL (1966) observed the presence ofsuch spines on the two wing surfaces of Aeshna cyanea, but did not produce any suggestion as to their aerodynamic function. NEWMAN, SAVAGE & SCHOUELLA (1977) studied the role of the spines in the flight of Aeshna interrupta without, however, coming to any clear conclusions. The latter authors measured the length of the spines in in Coenagrion sp. (60 pm), in Sympetrum and Gomphus; (70-80 and Aeshna eremita Since and Anaxjunius (100-125 pm).
    [Show full text]