Banned in Boston ": Moral Reform Politics and the New England Society for the Suppression of Vi^

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Banned in Boston Church History 78:4 (December 2009), 814-846. © American Society of Church History, 2009 doi: 10.1017/S0009640709990539 "Banned in Boston ": Moral Reform Politics and the New England Society for the Suppression of Vi^ P. C. KEMENY FTER laboring on the outside margins of polite literary circles for his entire career, Walt Whitman traveled to Boston in August 1881 to oversee the Apublication of his Leaves of Grass. The poet was on the verge of enjoying the national reputation that had eluded him for so long. He viewed the publication of the seventh and definitive edition of Leaves of Grass by a leading Boston publisher, James R. Osgood and Company, as a vindication of his lifelong labor. Now Whitman was about to be ranked with other notable Osgood authors, including Henry James, William Dean Howells, and Mark Twain.^ To be sure, some of New England's most famous authors had admired Whitman's poetry. Perhaps the most distinguished author of the day to applaud Whitman's work was Ralph Waldo Emerson. After reading the first edition of Leaves of Grass in 1855, Emerson privately wrote that he found the twelve poems to be "the most extraordinary piece of wit and wisdom that America has yet contributed." Yet it was not only, as Charles Eliot Norton protested in an unsigned review in 1855, Whitman's "self-conceit," lack of rhyme, and "scorn for the wonted usages of good writing" that hindered his reputation. Whitman also celebrated sexuality, openly "singing of the phallus" and glorifying the "hymen!"-' According to Norton, Whitman mixed "Yankee transcendentalism and New York rowdyism."'* Other early critics ' I would like to thank my student assistants, Katherine Conley, Joel Musser, and Ben Wetzel, for their assistance and to express my gratitude to Gillis J. Harp, Jeanne H. Kilde, Bruce Kuklick, H. Collin Messer, Eric Potter, Gary Scott Smith, and the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful criticisms of earlier drafts of this work. ^"Literary Notes," Boston Commonwealth, September 3, 1881, 3; Sylvester Baxter, "Walt Whitman in Boston," New England Magazine 6 (1892): 714-21. ^Walt Whitman, Leaves of Crass: Comprehensive Reader's Edition, ed. Harold W. Blogett and Sculley Bradley (New York: New York University Press, 1965), 91, 108. ''[Charles Eliot Norton], "Leaves of Grass," Putnam s Monthly 6 ( 1855): 321. While Norton wrote that he admired the "original perception of nature," "manly brawn," and "epic directness" of Whitman, P. C. Kemeny is Professor of Religion and Humanities at Grove City College. 814 BANNED IN BOSTON 815 were even less charitable. One reviewer dismissed Whitman's work as "a mass of stupid filth," and Charies Greenleaf Whittier reportedly tossed his copy of Leaves of Grass in his fireplace.^ Even Emerson had deep misgivings about the sexuality of some of Whitman's poems. When Whitman visited Boston in 1860 on the eve of the publication of the third edition oí Leaves of Grass, which included the grouping of twelve poems on sexuality entitled "Enfans d'Adam," Emerson spent two hours trying to convince him to exclude these poems. Emerson, Whitman later recalled, "did not see that if I had cut sex out I might just as well have cut everything out."'' When Emerson received a new edition oí Leaves of Grass in 1867 that still contained these poems, he asked a mutual friend to "tell Walt I am not satisfied."^ After that date Emerson's enthusiasm for Whitman cooled. Other poets of the genteel tradition, including Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, James Russell Lowell, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, simply ignored Whitman.* Given Whitman's rather tepid reception from America's leading literary figures, having a distinguished Boston publisher issue the definitive edition oí Leaves of Grass was for him a personal and professional triumph. In his negotiations. Whitman was adamant that the "Children of Adam" cluster must be included. "Fair warning on one point," he wrote the publisher, "the old pieces, the sexuality ones, ... must go in the same as ever."' Upon completion, he threw a grand party for three hundred people. Whitman finally felt vindicated. As he told the Boston Daily Advertiser, he "could not wish for a more beautiful and comforting two months.""^ in a letter to James Russell Lowell he privately confessed, "One cannot leave it about for chance readers." He added that he "would be sorry to know that any woman had looked into it past the title-page. I have got a copy for you, for there are things in it you will admire." Charles Eliot Norton to James Russell Lowell, 23 September 1855, Letters of Charles Eliot Norton, 2 vols. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1913), 1: 135. "'No, no,' Lowell replied, 'the kind ofthing you described won't do.'" James Russell Lowell to Charles Eliot Norton, 12 October 1855, Letters of James Russell Lowell, ed. Charles Eliot Norton, 3 vols. (1904; repn. New York: AJVIS 1966), 1:242. ^Rufiis M. Griswold, New York Criterion, November 10, 1855, in Walt Whitman, the Critical Heritage, ed. Milton Hindus (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971), 31; Horace Träubel, With Walt Whitman in Camden, 4 vols. (1905-1906; repn. New York: Rowman and Littlefield 1961), 1:127. •^Träubel, With Walt Whitman, 1:51. On the relationship between Whitman and Emerson, see David S. Reynolds, Walt Whitman's America: A Cultural Biography (New York: Knopf, 1995), 194. 'John Burroughs Diary, December 1871, quoted in Clara Barrus, Whitman and Burroughs: Comrades (1931; repr. Fort Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press, 1968), 64. *Gay Wilson Allen, The Solitary Singer: A Critical Biography of Walt Whitman (New York: Macmillan, 1955), 174; F. Lannon Smith, "The American Reception oí Leaves of Grass- 1855- 1882," Walt Whitman Review 22 (1979): 153. 'Walt Whitman to James R. Osgood, 8 May 1881, The Correspondence of Walt Whitman, ed. Edwin Haviland Miller, 6 vols. (New York: New York University Press, 1961-1977), 3:224. '""Walt Whitman. A Poet's Supper to his Printers and Proof Readers." [Camden Post], [18 October 1881], Walt Whitman—A Series of Twenty-Three Newspaper Items with Notes by the 816 CHURCH HISTORY Whitman's long hoped for triumph, however, soon evoked controversy. "Our attention," Suffolk County (Boston) district attorney Oliver Stevens wrote James Osgood in March 1882, "has been officially directed to a certain book entitled Leaves of Grass: Walt Whitman published by you. We are of the opinion that this book is such a book as brings it within the provisions of the Public Statutes respecting obscene literature, and suggests the propriety of withdrawing the same from circulation and suppressing the editions thereof" Otherwise, Stevens threatened, the charge that the work violated the state's obscenity law "will have to be entertained."" The complaint originated with Frederick B. Allen, assistant rector at Phillips Brooks's Trinity Church and the secretary of the New England Society for the Suppression of Vice, a local affiliate of Anthony Comstock's New York Society for the Suppression of Vice. Whitman initially agreed to excise a few words from certain poems so long as it was done so "silently." But when he leamed that Osgood, at the district attomey's prompting, insisted that he expunge several entire poems, mostly from the "Children of Adam" cluster, he refused. Osgood, fearing prosecution, negotiated a settlement with Whitman. He withdrew the book from publication and gave Whitman one hundred dollars, the remaining 225 copies of the book, and the stereotype plates.'^ A bitteriy disappointed Whitman vowed to gain revenge. Besides unleashing his own coterie of militant devotees against the censorship activities of Stevens, Comstock, and the New England Society for the Suppression of Vice, Whitman found ready allies in Boston free thinker George Chainey and free love activists Benjamin R. Tucker and Ezra Heywood. Chainey proclaimed that the "Russian Czar was never guilty of greater wrong, nor Spanish Inquisitor of baser injustice."''' Tucker advertised Whitman's work in his periodical. Liberty, and brazenly challenged Stevens to prosecute him.''* Heywood also taunted the district attomey and Comstock Post. Excerpts from the Trent Collection of Whitmaniana located in the Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library Duke University. "Oliver Stevens to James Osgood, 1 March 1882, The Complete Writings of Walt Whitman, ed. Richard Maurice Bucke, Thomas B. Hamed, and Horace L. Träubel, 10 vols. (1902; repr.. Brosse Pointe, MI: Scholarly Press, 1968), 8:289-90. 'Ajames Osgood to Walt Whitman, 4 March 1882, Complete Writings, 8:289; Walt Whitman to James Osgood, 7 March 1882, Complete Writings, 8:290; James Osgood to Walt Whitman, 21 March 1882, Complete Writings, 8:293-94; Walt Whitman to James Osgood, [23] March 1882, Complete Writings, 8:294; James Osgood to Walt Whitman, [29 March] 1881, Complete Writings, 8:295; Walt Whitman to James Osgood, March 1882, Complete Writings, 8:294; James Osgood to Walt Whitman, [10 April] 1882, Complete Writings, 8:296; Walt Whitman to James Osgood, 12 April 1882, Complete Writings, 8:296-97. '^George Chainey, "Keep Off the Grass," This Worid, June 17, 1882, 8, Container 22, Reel 13, Walt Whitman Papers in the Charles E. Feinberg Collection, Library of Congress. '"Advertisement, "Republished! The Suppressed Book!" Liberty, 22 July 1882, 2. BANNED IN BOSTON 817 in an "Open Letter to Walt Whitman" and published two of his banned poems. 15 When Heywood and Chainey were threatened with censorship, Whitman, ironically, declined to speak out publicly on their behalf. 1. PROTESTANT MORAL REFORMERS Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century moral reformers have been the subject of several different historical interpretations. Most historians, as Alison M. Parker contends in her study of the censorship activity of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, view moral reformers as deluded and antiquated remnants of "Victorian prudery."'^ Historians have interpreted these moral reformers as the unenlightened opponents of free speech, a manifestation of status anxiety amid a rapidly changing culture, a movement of cultural elites anxiously defending their social status (and their sons) against immigrants, a backlash against growing women's rights, or a harbinger of feminist values.'^ William R.
Recommended publications
  • Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 12 Number 2 Article 5 3-1-1992 Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age Steven C. Schechter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven C. Schechter, Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age, 12 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 367 (1992). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol12/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTRA-GOVERNMENTAL CENSORSHIP IN THE ADVERTISING AGE Steven C. Schechter* I. INTRODUCTION "Throughout history, families and religious groups have recognized their influence over the lives of their members and have used this influ- ence to maintain unity and adherence to a given set of values."' Vocal activists have for generations waged wars against works of literature and 2 art that they have found offensive to their religious or moral beliefs. They have attempted to exert their influence over society as a whole and to impose their values over all others. These activists believed that they were providing an invaluable service to society. From the time of the colonization of the United States through the 1950's, moral activists had the weapon of choice on their side: the strong-arm censorship powers of the law and the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Danziger, Edmund Jefferson Indians and Bureaucrats ENG 1974 University of Illinois Press Daris & Al
    1 Catalogue des livres de la bibliothèque anarchiste DIRA Mai 2011 [email protected] bibliothequedira.wordpress.com 514-843-2018 2035 Blv Saint-Laurent, Montréal Bibliothèque DIRA, Mai 2011. 2 Présentation ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 -A- ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 -B- ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 -C- ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13 -D- ............................................................................................................................................................................... 20 -E- ............................................................................................................................................................................... 23 -F- ................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 -G- ..............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy
    Brill’s Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy Edited by Nathan Jun LEIDEN | BOSTON For use by the Author only | © 2018 Koninklijke Brill NV Contents Editor’s Preface ix Acknowledgments xix About the Contributors xx Anarchism and Philosophy: A Critical Introduction 1 Nathan Jun 1 Anarchism and Aesthetics 39 Allan Antliff 2 Anarchism and Liberalism 51 Bruce Buchan 3 Anarchism and Markets 81 Kevin Carson 4 Anarchism and Religion 120 Alexandre Christoyannopoulos and Lara Apps 5 Anarchism and Pacifism 152 Andrew Fiala 6 Anarchism and Moral Philosophy 171 Benjamin Franks 7 Anarchism and Nationalism 196 Uri Gordon 8 Anarchism and Sexuality 216 Sandra Jeppesen and Holly Nazar 9 Anarchism and Feminism 253 Ruth Kinna For use by the Author only | © 2018 Koninklijke Brill NV viii CONTENTS 10 Anarchism and Libertarianism 285 Roderick T. Long 11 Anarchism, Poststructuralism, and Contemporary European Philosophy 318 Todd May 12 Anarchism and Analytic Philosophy 341 Paul McLaughlin 13 Anarchism and Environmental Philosophy 369 Brian Morris 14 Anarchism and Psychoanalysis 401 Saul Newman 15 Anarchism and Nineteenth-Century European Philosophy 434 Pablo Abufom Silva and Alex Prichard 16 Anarchism and Nineteenth-Century American Political Thought 454 Crispin Sartwell 17 Anarchism and Phenomenology 484 Joeri Schrijvers 18 Anarchism and Marxism 505 Lucien van der Walt 19 Anarchism and Existentialism 559 Shane Wahl Index of Proper Names 583 For use by the Author only | © 2018 Koninklijke Brill NV CHAPTER 10 Anarchism and Libertarianism Roderick T. Long Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Autographs – Auction November 8, 2018 at 1:30Pm 1
    Autographs – Auction November 8, 2018 at 1:30pm 1 (AMERICAN REVOLUTION.) CHARLES LEE. Brief Letter Signed, as Secretary 1 to the Board of Treasury, to Commissioner of the Continental Loan Office for the State of Massachusetts Bay Nathaniel Appleton, sending "the Resolution of the Congress for the Renewal of lost or destroyed Certificates, and a form of the Bond required to be taken on every such Occasion" [not present]. ½ page, tall 4to; moderate toning at edges and horizontal folds. Philadelphia, 16 June 1780 [300/400] Charles Lee (1758-1815) held the post of Secretary to the Board of Treasury during 1780 before beginning law practice in Virginia; he served as U.S. Attorney General, 1795-1801. From the Collection of William Wheeler III. (AMERICAN REVOLUTION.) WILLIAM WILLIAMS. 2 Autograph Document Signed, "Wm Williams Treas'r," ordering Mr. David Lathrop to pay £5.16.6 to John Clark. 4x7½ inches; ink cancellation through signature, minor scattered staining, folds, docketing on verso. Lebanon, 20 May 1782 [200/300] William Williams (1731-1811) was a signer from CT who twice paid for expeditions of the Continental Army out of his own pocket; he was a selectman, and, between 1752 and 1796, both town clerk and town treasurer of Lebanon. (AMERICAN REVOLUTION--AMERICAN SOLDIERS.) Group of 8 items 3 Signed, or Signed and Inscribed. Format and condition vary. Vp, 1774-1805 [800/1,200] Henry Knox. Document Signed, "HKnox," selling his sloop Quick Lime to Edward Thillman. 2 pages, tall 4to, with integral blank. Np, 24 May 1805 * John Chester (2). ALsS, as Supervisor of the Revenue, to Collector White, sending [revenue] stamps and home distillery certificates [not present].
    [Show full text]
  • Firebrand and the Forging of a New Anarchism: Anarchist Communism and Free Love Fall 2004
    The Firebrand and the Forging ofa New Anarchism: Anarchist Communism and Free Love Jessica Moran Fall 2004 Contents Firebrand and its Editors ........................... 8 What is Anarchist Communism? ...................... 12 Anarchism and Sex ............................. 15 Conclusion .................................. 19 2 In January 1895 a small paper appeared in Portland, Oregon. Titled Firebrand, and staunchly and openly advocating anarchist communism and free love, the pa- per was instrumental in the development of American anarchism. The paper sys- tematically brought working-class anarchism and social revolution to an English speaking audience for the first time, influencing the direction of anarchism inthe United States for the next twenty years. Understanding the pivotal position of Fire- brand in what is often considered a dormant period in American anarchist history, is necessary to comprehending the evolution of anarchism in the United States. The American anarchist movement thrived in the last part of the 1890s. Firebrand fos- tered the growth of an anarchist movement that incorporated the economic change fought for by the Haymarket anarchists, along with social issues like free love and individual freedom long advocated by individualist anarchists. Published between 1895 and 1897, Firebrand helped reinvigorate the anarchist movement, and intro- duced an important development that remained part of the anarchist movement throughout the twentieth century. By combining the economic and political argu- ments of anarchist communism with the social and cultural ideas of free love, Fire- brand and its contributors consciously developed an anarchism that appealed to both immigrant and native-born Americans. The anarchism discussed and worked out in the pages of Firebrand influenced and perhaps even formed the American an- archism appearing after the turn of the century, which gained popular expression throughout the Progressive Era.
    [Show full text]
  • To Inflame the Censors: Hemingway's Use of Obscenity in to Have And
    OF LEGAL AND LITERARY INTEREST To Inflame the Censors Hemingway’s Use of Obscenity in To Have and Have Not BY HON. MONA K. MAJZOUB AND CHRISTOPHER J. DOYLE Ernest Hemingway’s dedication to “full use of the English language” provoked a backlash culminating in the 1938 Detroit ban of To Have and Have Not. The legal battle over the ban of the controversial novel was mired by procedural irregularities, but the litigation catalyzed legal and artistic breakthroughs that ultimately furthered Hemingway’s objective of promoting realism in literature. EDITOR’S NOTE: THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS LANGUAGE WHICH SOME READERS MAY FIND OFFENSIVE. INTRODUCTION In the cabin of a rescue boat at sea between Cuba and Key West, Harry Morgan lies dying. Shot in the stomach by bank robbers This article would never have during a getaway gone wrong, the protagonist of Ernest been written without the urging Hemingway’s To Have and Have Not uses his last breaths to and encouragement of my stammer through a soliloquy that embodies a raw and fatalistic dear colleague, Judge Avern view of humanity: Cohn. Judge Cohn is an ardent student of both liter- “A man,” Harry Morgan said, looking at them both. ature and history, and he “One man alone ain’t got. No man alone now.” He never embraces one without stopped. “No matter how a man alone ain’t got no considering the other. He is bloody fucking chance.” indeed the literary sleuth whose relentless efforts uncovered the Famous for its uncensored use of the f-word, this signature only existing copy of Wayne County Chancery Judge passage of To Have and Have Not epitomizes Hemingway’s Ira Jayne’s December 20, 1939 order denying the commitment to “full use of the [English] language.” But the injunction sought by Detroit book dealer Alvin Hamer author did not use profanity for shock value.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    FISKE HALL NON-SEMINAR PAPER The Sage of Baltimore . \ l-ife of H.L. Mencken Luke Chennell On a blazing hot Sunday afternoon in 1925, Henry Louis Mencken sat at his typewriter in a hotel room in Dayton, T(.'1lnessee, stripped to his underwear. While he pecked away in his usual manner, he paused occasionally only to light up another Uncle Willie df,>ar and to roar with laughter at his own writing. The dispatch he u,-rote to the Baltimore Evening Stm was inarguably some of his best work. 1\lencken's dispatch told in flowing prose of a visit he and a female journalist took to a Holy Roller revival in the hills outside of Dayton, where "the old-time religion was genuinely on tap." The di>patch, later edited and published as "The Hills of Zion," would be one of Mencken's most reprinted essays.l Mencken was understandably concerned "vith religion at the time. The trial of John Scopes, a junior-high school teacher charged 'Weith teaching evolutionary doctrine contrary to Tennessee's anti-evolution laws, brought national attention to rising Christian fundamentalists across the nation. Though Scopes was eventually found guiltv, the sensational battle of Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan provided endless amounts of amusement for the country at large, no matter what the legal outcome. Always near the center of attention was .Mencken. His lengthy and subjective dispatches to the Sun describing the atmosphere of the town and the trial are pieces of reporting which have hardly been repeated nor equaled in the history of journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezra Heywood, William Batchelder Greene, Stephen Pearl Andrews, and Benjamin Tucker– Who Were from Thoreau’S Home State of Massachusetts and Were His Contemporaries
    19TH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS ANARCHISTS: EZRA HERVEY HEYWOOD One of the staunchest of Thoreau attackers, Vincent Buranelli, in “The Case Against Thoreau” (Ethics 67), would allege in 1957 that Henry from time to time altered his principles and his tactics with little or no legitimation. Buranelli charged him with having practiced a radical and dangerous politics. In his article we learn that Thoreau’s political theory “points forward to Lenin, the ‘genius theoretician’ whose right it is to force a suitable class consciousness on those who do not have it, and to the horrors that resulted from Hitler’s ‘intuition’ of what was best for Germany.” In his article we learn that Thoreau’s defense of John Brown gave “allegiance to inspiration rather than to ratiocination and factual evidence.” According to this source “Thoreau’s commitment to personal revelation made him an anarchist.” 1 An anarchist? According to the ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA, the term “anarchism” derives from a Greek root signifying “without a rule” and indicates “a cluster of doctrines whose principal uniting feature is the belief that government is both harmful and unnecessary.” So who the hell are these people, the “Anarchists”? —Well, although an early theorist of the no- 1. The initials of the person who prepared this material for the EB were “G.W.” — the PROPÆDIA volume lists these initials as belonging to George Woodcock, apparently a recidivist encyclopedist as he is listed as also having prepared a number of other ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA articles. HDT WHAT? INDEX EZRA HERVEY
    [Show full text]
  • Banned Books Catalogue
    B A N N E D BaumanRareBooks.com 1-800-97-bauman (1-800-972-2862) or 212-751-0011 [email protected] New York all books are shipped on approval and 535 Madison Avenue are fully guaranteed. (Between 54th & 55th Streets) Any items may be returned within ten days for any New York, NY 10022 reason (please notify us before returning). All reim- 800-972-2862 or 212-751-0011 bursements are limited to original purchase price. We accept all major credit cards. Shipping and insurance Monday - Saturday: 10am to 6pm charges are additional. Packages will be shipped by UPS or Federal Express unless another carrier is requested. Las Vegas Next-day or second-day air service is available upon Grand Canal Shoppes request. The Venetian | The Palazzo 3327 Las Vegas Blvd., South, Suite 2856 Las Vegas, NV 89109 888-982-2862 or 702-948-1617 open daily: 10am to 11pm www.baumanrarebooks.com Philadelphia twitter.com/baumanrarebooks (by appointment) facebook.com/baumanrarebooks 1608 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-546-6466 | (fax) 215-546-9064 Monday - Friday: 9am to 5pm • March 2017 • Banned books Introduction 4 1 Politics 5 2 Religion 27 3 What About the Children? 35 4 Lewd & Lascivious 47 5 Offensive & Immoral 63 Index 83 on cover: see item no. 74 left: see item no. 58 3 BANNED, burned, & CENSORED hese are the books that have changed societies and T toppled governments. We’re proud to offer you the op- portunity to add the landmarks of counterculture to your col- lection—The Catcher in the Rye, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four; or to preserve a Sendak book many people would prefer pulled from the shelves; or to own a copy of the first book to allow Soviets a glimpse in- side the gulags.
    [Show full text]
  • The Press and the Historical Development of Three Women's Intercollegiate Athletic
    THE PRESS :\ND THE HISTORIC\L DEVELOPl\lF>JT or THREE WOJ\IEN'S 1NTI2RCOLLEGL\TE ATHLETIC PROGR:\l\1S IN THE UPPER l\11DWFS1', 1950-1980 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Facultv of the North Dakota State Uni\·ersitv of Agriculture and Applied Science Th Danielle :\nn Teigen In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of f\IASTER OF ARTS i\fajor Department: Communication Degree: :t\Iass Communication :\pril 2011 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title The Press and the Historical Development of Three Women's Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in the Upper Midwest, 1950-1980 By Danielle Teiaen The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University's regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS North Dakota State University Libraries Addendum To protect the privacy of individuals associated with the document, signatures have been removed from the digital version of this docmnent. ABSTRACT Teigen, Danielle Ann, T\L\., Department of Communication, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, North Dakota State University, April 2011. The Press and the Historical Development of Three Women's Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in the L:pper Midwest, 19 50-1980. Major Professor: Dr. Ross Collins. r rom 1950-1980, women's intercollegiate athletic programs experienced exponential growth, with newspapers rarely detailing the journey until Title IX passed in 1972. This project examined how women's athletics developed at North Dakota State University, the Uni,·ersity of North Dakota, and Minnesota State University Moorhead, as well as the correlating press con:rage.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Dissertations
    UC Berkeley Dissertations Title Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b75k2nf Author Rubin, Elihu James Publication Date 2009-09-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California Transportation Center UCTC Dissertation No. 149 Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston Elihu James Rubin University of California, Berkeley Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston by Elihu James Rubin B.A. (Yale University) 1999 M.C.P. (University of California, Berkeley) 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Paul Groth, Chair Professor Richard Walker Professor C. Greig Crysler Fall 2009 Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston © 2009 by Elihu James Rubin Abstract Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston by Elihu James Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Paul Groth, Chair Insuring the City examines the development of the Prudential Center in Boston as a case study of the organizational, financial, and spatial forces that large insurance companies wielded in shaping the postwar American city. The Prudential Center was one of seven Regional Home Offices (RHOs) planned by Prudential in the 1950s to decentralize its management. What began as an effort to reinvigorate the company’s bureaucratic makeup evolved into a prominent building program and urban planning phenomenon, promoting the economic prospects of each RHO city and reshaping the geography of the business district.
    [Show full text]
  • BENJAMIN R. TUCKER: ANARCHISM, TYRANNY, and DESPAIR in His
    CHAPTER ONE BENJAMIN R. TUCKER: ANARCHISM, TYRANNY, AND DESPAIR In his unpublished autobiography, penned in his final resting place of Monaco, Benjamin R. Tucker (2008) concluded, “My life, though far from unhappy, is packed with incident, and has been one long flouting of the moral law.” It is certainly a unique story. He was born in a snowstorm in 1854 in South Dartmouth, in southern Massachusetts, and educated at the nearby Friends’ Academy, an institution to which he (2008) refers as “the crack school of New Bedford,” and later at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), having resisted his parents’ desire for him to attend Harvard, where many Friends’ Academy graduates continued their stud- ies. He spent three years at MIT, enjoying its promise of access to scientific knowledge as well as the metropolitan location in Boston, but did not graduate (McElroy 2003, 2; Reichert 1976, 141–142; Tucker 2008). His uncle, Charles Almy, an abolitionist, was the presiding officer of the New Bedford Lyceum, and so, in his youth, Tucker attended speeches that were given at that auditorium by a number of radical thinkers such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and anti-slavery leaders who included Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, and Wendell Phillips. Tucker’s interest in anarchism escalated after an unplanned meeting with Josiah Warren at the 1872 Boston convention of the New England Labor Reform League (Madison 1943, 444, 452; McElroy 2003, 2; Tucker 2008). Ghio (1903, 47) notes that this encounter with American Anarchism’s first prominent thinker led immediately to “une affection profonde et filiale” [a deep filial fondness] on the part of Tucker.
    [Show full text]