Langley Sustainable Urban Extension Draft Supplementary Planning Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aberdeen334973 1 Aberdeen335013 1
aberdeen3-34973_1 Summary In August 2007, Mr Harry McNab of Bancon Developments Ltd, commissioned Alison Cameron of Aberdeen City Council Archaeology Unit to conduct an archaeological evaluation on the site of a proposed development at Stoneywood Terrace, Aberdeen. No archaeological features were discovered during the evaluation; however, it was not possible to evaluate the western edge of site (the area of greatest archaeological potential) due to the presence of a grove of mature beech trees. This report recommends that the clients notify Aberdeen City Council Archaeology Unit prior to any future groundworks within this area, to allow an evaluation trench to be dug (if appropriate) to determine the possible location of the Aberdeenshire canal.. 1. Introduction and Background aberdeen3-35013_1 Summary In February 2007, Grampian Developments Ltd commissioned Aberdeen City Council Archaeology Unit to carry out an Archaeological Watching Brief on the site of a proposed development at Caberstone House, 47 Belmont Street, Aberdeen. All groundworks on site were carried out prior to an archaeologist being present in contravention of The town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997(1) and The Specification for Archaeological Watching Brief set out by the Keeper of Archaeology, Aberdeen City Council (February 2007). An archaeologist attended site in a remedial capacity and located no evidence for the existence or survival of any significant archaeological features. 1. Introduction and Background aberdeen3-38233_1 Summary This specification gives an outline of the archaeological value of this site and indicates the works which w be required to ensure that any surviving archaeological deposits are protected and recorded. 1.0 Site Location and Description albionar1-14063_1 Non-Technical Summary Huntingdon DC has granted planning consent (00/01585/OUT) to Bedfordia Developments Ltd for re-development of land at Grove Lane, Ellington, Cambridgeshire, NGR TL164/721. -
Roman Roads of Britain
Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath. -
Four Oaks Ward 26Th
Four Oaks Ward 26th May - 1st July 2021 Application 21 days for No Number Site Address Development Description Date Registered comment 3 Luttrell Road Four Oaks Sutton Erection of 1 no. 2021/04606/PA Coldfield 29/06/2021 20/07/2021 replacement dwelling house Birmingham B74 1 2SR 5 Royal Park Close Sutton Coldfield Erection of first floor side 2021/05268/PA 27/06/2021 18/07/2021 Birmingham B74 extension. 2 4RL 37 Meadowside Erection of two storey side Road Sutton and single storey rear 2021/05230/PA Coldfield 27/06/2021 18/07/2021 extensions and new roof Birmingham B74 over garage and porch. 3 4SL Sherborne House 2 Erection of single storey side Knowles Drive and rear extensions and 2021/05216/PA Sutton Coldfield 27/06/2021 18/07/2021 installation of dormer Birmingham B74 window to rear 4 2QW 2 Oaklands Road Erection of two storey side Sutton Coldfield 2021/05032/PA and rear extensions and 24/06/2021 15/07/2021 Birmingham B74 detatched garage to side 5 2TB Application to determine the details for condition numbers 6 (hard and/or soft landscape), 7 (details of Land rear of 2-22 materials), 8 (boundary Clarence Road Four treatment), 9 (lighting Oaks Sutton scheme), 11 (sample of 2021/04110/PA 24/06/2021 15/07/2021 Coldfield materials), 12 (floor levels) Birmingham B74 and 14 (arboricultural 4AE method statement) attached to planning approval 2018/06656/PA allowed under appeal decision 6 APP/P4605/W/19/3243127 39 Beaton Road Sutton Coldfield Erection of single storey 2021/04863/PA Birmingham B74 front extension 7 7RU 100 Rosemary Hill Road Four Oaks Erection of single storey rear 2021/03882/PA 18/06/2021 09/07/2021 Sutton Coldfield extension Birmigham B74 4HH 8 Non-Material Amendment to Planning Approval 112 Walsall Road 2020/10328/PA to change 2021/05377/PA Four Oaks Sutton 17/06/2021 08/07/2021 the colour of the materials Coldfield B74 4RB to the exterior of the 9 building Four Oaks House - Car Space 1 160 Retention of existing 30m 2021/04766/PA Lichfield Road Four mast for a temporary period 16/06/2021 07/07/2021 Oaks Sutton of 12 months. -
Potters at Peddimore
Potters at Peddimore Mike Hodder Introduction Sometime between 1213 and 1229, Thomas Newburgh, Earl of Warwick (lord of the manor of Sutton Coldfield), granted Thomas Arden the assart (land newly cleared for agricultural use) that Roger le Fleur enclosed in Peddimore, in length from the hedge Roger laid up to the enclosed wood (hay) of Osbert of Wishaw and in breadth between Roger’s ditch alongside fossetellos ollatorum and the land Earl Waleran (father of Thomas Newburgh) gave to Thomas’s father1. The words “ossetellos ollatorum” are translated as “potters’ sheds” by the editor of the document. Ollatororum is literally “of the pot or jar makers”, but another, more likely translation of fossetellos is “small pits”, which in this context would be clay pits, from which the potters dug their raw materials2. This is as yet the only evidence for pottery manufacture in Sutton Coldfield in the Middle Ages and it raises several questions: where exactly were these clay pits and adjoining workshops, drying sheds and kilns, and what traces are likely to remain?; what type of vessels were the potters making, why were they making pottery here, and how does it relate to other medieval pottery manufacture in the vicinity? Pieces of a medieval cooking pot found in excavations at Castle Bromwich Castle Location Much assarting in the vicinity is recorded in the thirteenth century and the location of some of the pieces of land mentioned in 1240, to the north and east of Peddimore Hall and up to Ox Leys Road and the boundary with Wishaw parish, can be identified from nineteenth-century field names, but no recorded field names refer to potters or potting3. -
Interconnect Improving the Journey Experience Interconnect: Improving the Journey Experience
Interconnect Improving the journey experience Interconnect: Improving the journey experience Piloted in the centre of Birmingham, UK, Interconnect Interconnect delivers a visionary blueprint seeks to improve the journey experience for people living for connecting the journey experience. in and visiting the West Midlands region. The project seeks to improve the quality of information across all media channels, transport services and public environments. Interconnect is a partnership, project In turn the approach is helping attract and innovative design approach focused visitors, tourism and investment that will on improving the ‘interface’ between support new jobs and a stronger economy, people, places and transport systems. building the reputation of the region The project promotes a vision of a internationally and contributing towards world class movement network with social, environmental and economic infrastructure and passenger facilities benefi ts for all. designed to create welcoming places In support of the vision, the Interconnect supported by legible and intuitive partnership is encouraging new ways information systems. of working, enabling organisations Piloted for the fi rst time in the West to plan, develop and deliver effective Midlands region of the United Kingdom, improvements to the journey experience. Interconnect aims to improve the journey The Interconnect partners are sharing experience for people, whether they are knowledge, identifying mutually benefi cial visiting for the fi rst time, or making their opportunities and maximising investment daily commute. – delivering major improvements for Investment in ongoing regeneration everyone who lives and works in, or and renewal projects is delivering radical visits the region. changes to the region. The benefi ts of This publication will be of value to other this investment are being maximised places, cities and regions who wish to by interconnecting transport, tourism, improve the journey experience. -
CPRE Warwickshire ID 733921
CPRE Warwickshire ID 733921 BIRMINGHAM PLAN 2031 Statement by CPRE Warwickshire MATTER E - Green Belt, Langley Sustainable Urban Extension and Peddimore Employment Allocation - Policies TP10, GA5 and GA6 Summary 1.1 CPRE Warwickshire supports the protection of the Green Belt within Birmingham’s boundary and the maintenance of established policies for its protection and for handling planning applications within it. We oppose the Langley Urban Extension and the Peddimore allocation. Both should both be omitted from the Plan and the Proposals Map. 1.2 Exceptional circumstances have not been demonstrated to justify removal of the Langley location from the Green Belt. The need for the housing proposed has not been clearly demonstrated and if there is a need in the future this does not justify release of any land from Green Belt now, prior to a Review of the Plan in 2021 or shortly thereafter. 1.3 The Peddimore proposal is inferior to the former major employment land allocation (in the 2010 Consultation Draft) at Washwood Heath. Exceptional circumstances have not been shown to justify this change of a major allocation from a suitable brownfield location to a greenfield site outside the urban boundary. Policy TP10 – Green Belt (Question E.1) 2.1 Policy TP10 does not itself refer to the proposal to remove land from the Green Belt; this only appears in para 6.57 which follows the Policy in the text. The TP10 Policy wording applies to land that remains in the Green Belt. 2.2 The Policy states “There is a general presumption against inappropriate development within the Green Belt, and such development will not be permitted unless very special circumstances exist. -
BIRMINGHAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN Part of Birmingham’S Local Plan
BIRMINGHAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN Part of Birmingham’s Local Plan Planning for sustainable growth Adopted January 2017 Contact Planning and Regeneration Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council Click: E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.birmingham.gov.uk/plan2031 Visit: Office: 1 Lancaster Circus Birmingham B4 7DJ Post: PO Box 28 Birmingham B1 1TU You can ask for a copy of this document in large print, another format or another language. We aim to supply what you need within ten working days. Call (0121) 303 4041 If you have hearing difficulties please call us via Typetalk 18001 0121 303 4041 or e-mail us at the address above. Plans contained within this document are based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Birmingham City Council. Licence number 100021326, 2017. Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 2 About Birmingham 11 3 The vision, objectives and strategy 17 The vision - Birmingham in 2031 Objectives The strategy 4 Planning for growth 27 PG1 Overall levels of growth PG2 Birmingham as an international city PG3 Place making 5 Spatial delivery of growth 33 GA1 City Centre GA2 Greater Icknield GA3 Aston, Newtown and Lozells GA4 Sutton Coldfield Town Centre GA5 Langley Sustainable Urban Extension GA6 Peddimore GA7 Bordesley Park GA8 Eastern Triangle GA9 Selly Oak and South Edgbaston GA10 Longbridge contents / -
PEDDIMORE: a NEW ECONOMIC ASSET Creating a Great Place to Work for the Royal Town of Sutton Coldfield and Birmingham
PEDDIMORE: A NEW ECONOMIC ASSET Creating a great place to work for the Royal Town of Sutton Coldfield and Birmingham Peddimore Hall COME ALONG 8 WALMLEY 3 A LANGLEY URBAN View the plans and EXTENSION Peddimore have your say at Zone B Peddimore Zone A one of our public Asda exhibitions on the proposals for the MINWORTH D ROA KINGSBURY Minworth Sewage new Peddimore 4097 A Treatment Works 8 employment park. A3 Maximum extent of built development The Birmingham Development Plan CASTLE VALE allocation boundary In March 2018, Birmingham City THE PUBLIC EXHIBITIONS WILL BE OPEN ON: Council selected IM Properties (IMP) as its development TUE 20 NOVEMBER TUE 27 NOVEMBER partner to prepare a planning 3PM-8PM 3PM–8PM application and deliver the The Sanctuary, Castle Vale Falcon Lodge Community Centre first phase (zone A) of the Tangmere Road, Castle Vale, Churchill Road, Peddimore employment park Birmingham, B35 7PX Royal Sutton Coldfield, B75 7LB in Minworth. The vision is to create a best in class WED 21 NOVEMBER THU 29 NOVEMBER development which attracts leading national 2PM-8PM 2PM-8PM and international manufacturing and logistics Sutton Coldfield Town Hall St Nicholas Church Hall, Curdworth businesses, delivering local economic and social benefits that Birmingham and the Upper Clifton Road, Coleshill Road, Curdworth, surrounding area can be proud of. Royal Sutton Coldfield, B73 6AB B76 9ES OUR PROPOSALS INCLUDE: • High-quality employment space and THU 22 NOVEMBER FRI 30 NOVEMBER associated infrastructure across zones A and B 2PM-8PM 2PM–8PM -
Perry Barr Constituency Economic & Employment Profile
Perry Barr Constituency Economic & Employment Profile March 2015 Economic Research & Policy Economy Directorate Perry Bridge Flikr Creative Commons Contents Introduction 2 Perry Barr Key Facts 3 1. Business 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Employment 4 1.2.1 Private Sector Employment 5 1.2.2 Employment by Sector 5 1.3 Employment Forecasts 6 1.4 Enterprise 6 1.4.1 Business Numbers 6 1.4.2 Businesses by Sector 7 2. Place 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Development & Regeneration 9 2.3 Deprivation & Child Poverty 9 2.3.1 Child Poverty 10 3. People 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 Working Age Population 11 3.2.1 Ethnic Structure 12 3.3 Qualifications & Skills 12 3.3.1 NVQ Qualifications 13 3.4 Economic Activity 13 3.5 Unemployment 14 3.5.1 Youth Unemployment 15 3.5.2 Unemployment by Ethnicity 16 Introduction The Perry Barr constituency is fourth largest constituency in proportion than the city located in the north of Birmingham. The constituency average of 42.1% and over Birmingham and comprises the has a population of 107,090, four times the national average four wards of Handsworth the fourth largest population of of 14.6%. Wood, Lozells and East all the constituencies in the This report provides detailed Handsworth, Oscott and Perry city; Perry Barr has the fourth information on the Perry Barr Barr. The constituency forms smallest population density of constituency and intra- the northwest boundary of the the 10 constituencies at 43 constituency comparisons by city. The four wards are largely people per hectare. -
Planning for Birmingham's Growing Population
BIRMINGHAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN Planning for Birmingham’s growing population Options Consultation October 2012 Contact Development Directorate Birmingham City Council Click: E-mail: [email protected] Call: Telephone: (0121) 303 4041 Visit: Office: 1 Lancaster Circus Birmingham B4 7DJ Post: PO Box 28 Birmingham B1 1TU You can ask for a copy of this document in large print, another format or another language. We aim to supply what you need within ten working days. Call (0121) 303 4041 If you have hearing difficulties please call us via Typetalk 18001 0121 303 4041 or e-mail us at the address above. Plans contained within this document are based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Birmingham City Council. Licence number 100021326, 2012. Contents Introduction 2 The plan 4 Planning for Birmingham’s growing population 14 contents / birmingham development plan 2 Introduction By 2031 Birmingham’s population is projected to grow by 150,000. This level of growth, based upon recent trends, is greater than has previously been considered and presents a significant challenge for planning the future homes and jobs the City needs. If Birmingham is to achieve its ambitions and prosper it will be vital that a positive and proactive approach is taken to how we plan for these homes and jobs in the most sustainable and deliverable way possible. The Birmingham Development The outcomes of this consultation, Plan will be central to this approach along with all previous work and setting out the statutory planning comments made during past framework that will guide decisions consultations, will inform the on development and regeneration final version of the Birmingham over the period to 2031. -
Peddimore Supplementary Planning Document
Peddimore Supplementary Planning Document April 2019 CON Contents 1 TENTS Foreword 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Vision 9 Development principles • Connectivity • Design • Sustainability 3 Delivery 21 The images included in the SPD are taken from other projects in the UK and abroad to illustrate similar exemplar developments and key projects. They are shown as examples of the quality that can be achieved on the basis of good design principles set out in this SPD, with the design of place and buildings on Peddimore having its own site specific response. peddimore / contents contents / peddimore 2 FOREForeword 3 WORD Peddimore is one of the most significant industrial development opportunities within the UK, with the potential to accommodate 265,000 square metres of new floorspace. Our decision to release 71 hectares of land from the Green Belt will create a world class employment estate and will see major new business space brought forward. Up to 10,000 jobs will be created and a £350 million contribution made to the local economy. It will rival other major UK industrial and distribution developments. The development will be brought forward in stages, with the first phase of 37 hectares providing the infrastructure to serve the whole site, including a new junction onto the A38, public transport connections and major green infrastructure. In March 2018, the City Council announced IM Properties as our development partner who will deliver this scheme to the highest quality. Following the public consultation in Autumn 2018 with the wider community and partners, this Supplementary Planning Document was amended and now sets out the City’s vision and expectations for this unparalleled development opportunity. -
Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 6 July 2021 Trinity Centre 7Pm
Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 6 July 2021 Trinity Centre 7pm Present Cllrs Horrocks (Chairman), D. Allan, Briggs and Simper. In Attendance Olive O’Sullivan Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Natalia Gorman. There was one member of the press in attendance. No questions were submitted in advance of the meeting. Cllr Horrocks advised the CEO in advance of the meeting that she would be late. Cllr Allan took the role of Chair and the meeting commenced at 7pm. 10 Apologies for Absence Apologies received from Cllrs L Allen, Ellis, Hodgins and Puri. Resolved to accept the apologies received. 11 Declarations of Interest None. 12 Minutes of Last Meeting Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of Planning & Highways Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 1st June 2021 be signed as a true record of the meeting. 13 Matters Arising None. 14 Questions from Members The CEO confirmed that no questions were submitted in advance of the meeting. 15 Driver Feedback Signs The CEO advised that a request had been received for a driver feedback sign to be installed outside Highclare School on Birmingham Road. The CEO sought advice from Birmingham City Council (BCC) Highways Engineers on the suitability of this location for a driver feedback sign and the advice from BCC was that rather Page | 1 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 6th July 2021 than purchasing an additional sign it would be better to move the existing feedback sign that is near the junction of Birmingham Road and Woodleigh Road, closer to the school. Cllr Horrocks joined the meeting at 19.05.