DOCSLIB.ORG

18393 Court Legacy 2/05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
18393 Court Legacy 2/05 The Court Legacy The Historical Society for the United States District Court Vol. XVIII, No. 2 for the Eastern District of Michigan ©20 11 September 20 11 U.S. Supreme Court Review of outline the court system then put in place by Congress. The Cases Originating in the District District Court established in of Michigan: 1836 to 1863 Michigan in July 1836 had jurisdiction over admiralty By David A. Gardey 1 and maritime cases, as well as minor civil and petty criminal Before Congress created the cases. 2 Judge Wilkins was Eastern District of Michigan responsible for these cases. on February 24, 1863, all of Above the District Court, Michigan had been in one Congress established the federal district with one Circuit Court of the United United States District Judge, States for the District of John McLean, the Honorable Ross Wilkins. Michigan. The Circuit Court United States Supreme Court Justice, 1829-1861 Federal cases were heard had jurisdiction over diversity either by Judge Wilkins in the cases and major criminal District Court or by a visiting cases. In addition, the Circuit Court heard appeals U.S. Supreme Court Justice in from the District Court. The Circuit Court consisted the Circuit Court for the of at least one Supreme Court Justice, literally riding Ross Wilkins, District of Michigan. From circuit to Michigan, and the District Judge, Judge United States District the creation of the District Wilkins. The Circuit Justice assigned to Michigan in Judge, 1837-1870 of Michigan on July 1, 1836, the mid-nineteenth century was Justice John McLean, until the creation of the who served on the Supreme Court from 1829 to 1861. 3 Eastern District twenty-seven years later, there were Appeals from the Circuit Court would then go to nineteen reported decisions of the United States the Supreme Court. Several of the appeals that the Supreme Court that originated in the federal Circuit Supreme Court heard during this era resulted when or District court of Michigan. An examination of Justice McLean and Judge Wilkins could not agree these cases provides insight into the early federal on a result in the Circuit Court. At the time, it was docket and the legal battles taking place in Michigan the practice that the Justice who was assigned to the in the mid-nineteenth century. They paint an historical Circuit Court would recuse himself on appeals from portrait of a young sovereignty developing its first his Circuit Court unless there was a split vote. 4 By industries of mining, lumber, and railroads, while still Act of Congress, District Judges could not vote in beleaguered by property disputes stemming back to the Circuit Court in reviewing an appeal of their the French and Indian War. While some of the cases own decisions from the District Court. 5 are interesting from a purely historical perspective, The District and Circuit Courts in Michigan had two others are significant as to the scope of the several appointed officials to assist in their duties. 6 Supreme Court’s power, holding that Congress can After Michigan became a state, Commissioners limit the jurisdiction of federal courts and that for United States Courts were appointed by the federal courts must yield to the highest state court in Circuit Court, and their term was for life. Their interpreting state statutes. The precedential value of work appears to be similar to the Magistrate Judges these cases remains alive today. of today. The Commissioners’ duties included Before examining some of the Michigan federal cases conducting hearings and taking testimony as that reached the Supreme Court, it is helpful to referred by either the Circuit or District Court. The testimony taken would have the same force as The Historical Society for the United States testimony taken in the courts, and the Commissioners District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan were used in order to lessen the burden on the judges. Established in 1992 The parties to any case could jointly select the BOARD OF TRUSTEES Commissioner before whom testimony would be President taken. After Michigan became a state, the District and Michael J. Lavoie Circuit Courts also appointed Masters in Chancery to Vice President assist in the chancery work. Brian D. Figot The earliest reported decision from the District of Secretary Michigan that reached the Supreme Court was the Paula A. Hall 1845 case of Charles Carroll v. Orrin Safford Treasurer (Treasurer of Genesee County) .7 After the plaintiff, Samuel C. Damren Charles Carroll, bought 3,549.71 acres of federal land Executive Director in 1836 for $7,500, the Treasurer of Genesee County Judith K. Christie seized and sold the land after Carroll failed to pay Catherine M. Beck taxes before he received his land patent from the David G. Chardavoyne United States in 1837. The Supreme Court held against Hon. Avern Cohn Carroll, finding that he owed the state taxes on the Thomas W. Cranmer land from the date he purchased it, even before he M. Ellen Dennis Hon. John Feikens received his patent from the United States. David A. Gardey The 1849 decision in Jonathan Nesmith v. Thomas Alan C. Harnisch Sheldon ,8 presented a more important issue of the Michael C. Leibson Matthew J. Lund power of the U.S. Supreme Court in relation to state John P. Mayer courts. In Nesmith, the issue of law involved the Hon. Stephen J. Murphy, III establishment of banking associations by the Gregory V. Murray Michigan Legislature. This issue had already been Ross G. Parker addressed and decided in a separate case that had Jeffrey G. Raphelson reached the Michigan Supreme Court. Before the U.S. Jeffrey A. Sadowski Matthew Schneider Supreme Court, counsel for the plaintiff argued that it Hon. Arthur J. Tarnow would be wrong for the U.S. Supreme Court to I.W. Winsten “presume that the State courts are infallible, and their Advisor decisions an unerring exposition of the State statute, David J. Weaver and shut their eyes entirely to the terms and provisions of the statute, and refuse to inquire THE COURT LEGACY whether the decision of a State court is a fair John P. Mayer, Editor M. Ellen Dennis, Assistant Editor explanatory law.” In fact, counsel argued that the “national courts, which were created to protect the Published periodically by The Historical Society for the United rights of citizens of other States,” should not “allow States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Office of the Clerk, Room 216, Theodore Levin United States their suitors to be wronged and defrauded in like Courthouse, Detroit, MI 48226-2797. manner.” In other words, counsel was calling for the Subscriptions available through any Society membership. U.S. Supreme Court to protect citizens from another Membership benefits include the Newsletter, voting privileges, state harmed as a result of an incorrect, and possibly and the Annual Meeting. The Historical Society has extended the benefits of membership to members of the Eastern District biased, interpretation of state law by the Michigan of Michigan Chapter of the Federal Bar Association. Supreme Court that benefitted Michigan citizens. In Papers are encouraged to be submitted to the Newsletter editor response, counsel for the defendant argued that were for consideration as MS Word (preferred) or WordPerfect the U.S. Supreme Court to contradict the Michigan documents to [email protected] or m.ellen.dennis@gmailcom. Supreme Court, it “is plain that the consequences The Court Legacy reserves copyright to authors of signed articles. Permission to reprint a signed article should be would be most disastrous,” creating multiple versions obtained directly from the author and The Court Legacy of state law depending on the venue, and give should be acknowledged in the reprint. Unsigned material may non-residents the right to collect on obligations, be reprinted without permission provided The Court Legacy is given credit. while state residents were barred from collecting based on the decisions of the state courts. Page 2 Defense counsel argued that while it protects the citizens of Michigan from the “It is difficult to imagine a payment of admitted debts,” the Court decided that case in which a disagreement the case “peculiarly calls upon us not to surrender between the federal tribunals our clear convictions and unbiased judgment to the and the State judicatories authority of the new state decision.” would be more alarming or The power of Congress to limit the jurisdiction of mischievous.” federal courts was demonstrated by the decision in The Supreme Court, with Thomas Sheldon v. William Sill .10 Sheldon was Chief Justice Roger Taney brought as a diversity case in the Circuit Court in writing for the Court, held Michigan by a New York plaintiff against Michigan that since the Michigan defendants for recovery on a mortgage. The Circuit Supreme Court had already Court held in favor of the plaintiff and rejected the Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the ruled on the issue, “it is the defendants’ claim that the court lacked jurisdiction United States, 1836-1864 established doctrine of this because an assignment of a mortgage cannot create court, that it adopt and diversity under a strict reading of the Congressional follow the decisions of the State courts in the statute. Before the Supreme Court, counsel for the construction of their own constitution and statutes, New York plaintiff argued that under the when that construction has been settled by the Constitution, the judicial power of United States decision of its highest judicial tribunal.” Given the courts extended to all controversies between citizens prior decision of the state court, the issue “cannot be of different states. Since the case involved a considered as open for argument in this court.” controversy between citizens of different states, then Thus, the Supreme Court would not seek to interfere there was jurisdiction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LABORS and EXPERIENCES of Laura S. Haviland
    Library of Congress A woman's life-work Shine for the oppressed Laura S. Haviland Woman's Life-Work: LABORS AND EXPERIENCES OF Laura S. Haviland. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Aug 16 1883 m No. 16750 CITY OF WASHINGTON. CINCINNATI: PRINTED BY WALDEN & STOWE, FOR THE AUTHOR. 1882. E450 .H38 Copyright by LAURA S. HAVILAND, 1881. DEDICATION. TO My Two Sons, and Four Daughters, and Families; ALSO TO THE Home and Foreign Missionaries ARE THESE PAGES DEDICATED. The Author. PREFACE. In presenting the following pages to the public, without the trace of an excellent scholar or eloquent orator, I fully realize my inability to compete with writers of the nineteenth century. With this incompetency in view, I have hesitated and delayed until three-score and thirteen years are closing over me. Yet as I am still spared to toil on a little longer in the great field so white to harvest, praying the Lord of the harvest to arm and send forth more laborers, because they are too few, I ask an indulgent public to allow my deep and abiding sympathies for the oppressed and sorrowing of ever nation, class or color, to plead my excuse for sending forth simple, unvarnished facts and experiences, hoping they may increase an aspiration for the active doing, instead of saying what ought to be done, with excusing self for want of ability, when it is to be found in HIm who is saying, “My grace is sufficient for thee, for my strength is perfect in weakness.” LAURA S. HAVILAND. A woman's life-work http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbum.24792 Library of Congress October, 1881.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Branch
    Chapter V THE JUDICIAL BRANCH The Judicial Branch . 341 The Supreme Court . 342 The Court of Appeals . 353 Michigan Trial Courts . 365 Judicial Branch Agencies . 381 2013– 2014 ORGANIZATION OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Supreme Court 7 Justices State Court Administrative Office Court of Appeals (4 Districts) 28 Judges Circuit Court Court of Claims (57 Circuits) Hears claims against the 218 Judges State. This is a function of General Jurisdiction the 30th Judicial Circuit Court, includes Court (Ingham County). Family Division Probate District Court Municipal Court (78 Courts) (104 Districts) (4 Courts) 103 Judges 248 Judges 4 Judges Certain types of cases may be appealed directly to the Court of Appeals. The Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 provides that “The judicial power of the state is vested exclusively in one court of justice which shall be divided into one supreme court, one court of appeals, one trial court of general jurisdiction known as the circuit court, one probate court, and courts of limited jurisdiction that the legislature may establish by a two-thirds vote of the members elected to and serving in each house.” Michigan Manual 2013 -2014 Chapter V – THE JUDICIAL BRANCH • 341 THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES OF THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT Term expires ROBERT P. YOUNG, JR., Chief Justice . Jan. 1, 2019 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH . Jan. 1, 2015 MARY BETH KELLY . Jan. 1, 2019 STEPHEN J. MARKMAN . Jan. 1, 2021 BRIDGET MARY MCCORMACK . Jan. 1, 2021 DAVID F. VIVIANO . Jan. 1, 2015 BRIAN K. ZAHRA . Jan. 1, 2015 www.courts.mi.gov/supremecourt History Under the territorial government of Michigan established in 1805, the supreme court consisted of a chief judge and two associate judges appointed by the President of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION National Archives and Records Service Franklin D
    / GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION National Archives and Records Service Franklin D. Roosevelt Library Hyde Park, New York INDEX TO FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT'S COLLECTION OF AUTOGRAPHS AND MISCELLANEOUS HISTORICAL MANUSCRIPTS \ / ADA11S, JOHN ALABANA (cont' d) Adams' letter to 400 Conmercial letter of 249 LGeorg~Hammond, N. F. Smith /jer J. British Junister to H. MannJ, Hobile, to the United States, Charles T. Pollard, introducing John }lontgomery,, regarding Quincy Adams, 1794. prices, market con- ditions, etc., written Adams' signature on 401 on printed sheet of patent issued to Merchants' and Planters' Nicholas J. Roosevelt Price-Current, 1850. and James Smallman for self-propelling steam Commercial letter 254 engine, 1798. from D~Ger and Abbot, }lobile, to Eben Chad- ADA}IS, JOHN QUINCY wick, Boston, regard- ing shipments of Whig Party subscrip- 168 cotton, 1851. tion for funds to de- fray cost of printing Bill of sale to John 271 political tracts fmr G. Motly, Tuskegee, the re-election of Alabama, for negro Adams, with list of slave, Jane, 1860. ~, Raleigh, North Carolina subscribers, 1828. ALElCANDER, WILLIA}! see: Stirling, Maj. Gen. Lord 44 Letter of John Adams 400 1778. to George Hammond, , British lunister to fuVIERICA the United States, in- troducing J. Q. Adams, Stanza apparently 380 1794. in handwriting of author, S. F. Smith. ALABA}!A lYndat eil Land grant in Alabama 212 J\}~CAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION to James C. Watson from the United States Letter of N. H. Egle- 346 Government by virtue ston, Secretary, to of the United States Prof. L?JRothrock Treaty with the Creek regarding forestry Indians, signed by and the prevention Martin Van Buren, 1840.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupying for Peace, the U.S. Army in Mexico, 1846-1848
    Occupying For Peace, The U.S. Army In Mexico, 1846-1848 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas W. Spahr Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Mark Grimsley Professor John Guilmartin Professor Kenneth J. Andrien Professor Randolph Roth Copyright by Thomas W. Spahr 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the United States‘ execution of the military occupation of Mexico during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). It argues that the occupation was successful and played an important role in achieving the American strategic objectives. The occupation succeeded because (a) President James K. Polk and his military commanders formulated a sound and flexible strategy, (b) a relatively competent corps of professional army officers executed that strategy, and (c) the United States Army maintained consistent military superiority over the Mexicans throughout the conflict. This dissertation examines the military occupation in terms of the American management of the Mexican population down to the city level, and the American reaction to Mexican resistance after the conventional army was defeated and driven from different parts of the country. The Americans were successful during the occupation because they applied an artful blend of conciliation toward the population, calibrated coercion, and co-option of much of the Catholic clergy and Mexican elite. The American victories on the conventional battlefield and conciliation of the population did not in themselves convince the Mexicans to cease resistance. The Army eventually succeeded by transitioning to a more punitive policy, targeting those who resisted or abetted resistance, particularly the elite, and by demonstrating to the Mexicans that they were committed to continuing the occupation indefinitely.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Legacy 8/00
    THE COURT Legacy The Historical Society for the United States District Court Vol. VIII, No. 1 for the Eastern District of Michigan ©2000 September, 2000 The Additional Court of Street voiced his opinions about Doty and the prospect of facing a Métis jury when he wrote Michigan Territory, 1823-1836 that he had “no prospect of a fair trial before the By Dr. Patrick J. Jung presiding judge . and little hope that an impartial jury can be promised at this place” since it was This is the second of a two-part article on the Additional composed of “ignorant Canadian French and mixed Court. In this issue Dr. Jung discusses some of the early breed Indians, not one in 20 of whom can read or cases, the unique circumstances encountered by the court write.” Not surprisingly, the jury decided in and the ability of Judge Doty to establish justice under Brunet’s favor. this new system of law. In the end, Street and Kearney lost nothing, for In the first part of this article I discussed the Congress voted to reimburse them. A similar establishment of the additional Court and its effect outcome occurred that same year when an American on the affairs of the territory. Judge Doty was trader named Daniel Whitney had his lumber camp instrumental in bringing balance to legal affairs that destroyed by troops from Fort Winnebago at the had been dominated by autocratic army officers and portage of the Fox and Wisconsin Rivers. Whitney Indian agents. In fact, one of the first cases heard by sued Street and the Fort Winnebago commander, Judge Doty and discussed in the last issue involved Major David E.
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    S-ft 'V’M.* 9 «, 9,6 Hi A Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun04unse_ ^ 7 V- M PaS« NOP I Q R R p T U V W W W X Y Z w times the Gazette' was loyal to the Gov ernment and faithful to the best interests of the State and the community, though for | 1 PUBLISHED EVERY MORNING the time being it was on the unpopular side and had to maintain its fidelity at no small ,_ fExcept Sunday),_^__ - It sacrifice of personal and pecuniary interests. ; TIRJRSDAY. JULY 09. 1SS6. It may safely be affirmed that, following ' ONK HUNDRED YEAR*. this noble example of its founder, the The Commercial Gazette congratulates Gazette has ever since been ranged on its readers on having completed the one the side of law and order. While abating f hundredth year of^its existence. It is some¬ neither jot nor tittle of its right to criticise : thing to be proud of that a newspaper en¬ and condemn whatever it conceived to bo , terprise, started in the Western wilderness amiss either in the laws themselves or the i at a time when social and political chaos manner of their enforcement, it never conn- j brooded over th’e new world, should have tenanced nullification, secession or armed ! grown steadily on through all the mutations rebellion.
    [Show full text]
  • CARD PARTIES White Tables and Chairs for Rent
    H.R.LE~ fURNIT\llltco_',,. CARD PARTIES White Tables and Chairs for Rent Artistic and Elegant Furniture and 0 Id Sheffield Silver Jmported Novelties, &c., &c. ~~ H. R. Leonard Furniture Co. 306 to 310 WOODWARD AVENUE 12-14 COLUMBIA STREET. EAST OUR NEW HOME A BOOK SHOP LARGE enough to accommodate a representative stock of standard works and new publications. SMALL enough t_o suggest the calm atmosphere of the private library. MOD~RN enough to present numerous new features in equipment and servi~e. QLD-FASHIOND enough to· offer a welcome to all who wish to browse at leisure among well selected books. you ARE cordially invited to visit us. QUR new department. FAVORS for all occasions. DENNEN'S BOOK SHOP 19 EAST GRAND RIVER AVENUE (Just a Step From Woodward) uJQt Jftnplts @,tntt -~auk CORNER FORT AND SHELBY STREETS CAPITA~ $2,500,000 SURPLUS AN_D PROFITS, $3,500,000 ·C!tnmnttrrial auh &aniugs lrpartmruts · &ttft ltpnsit Jtaults FOREIGN EXCHANGE FOR SALE AND LETTERS OF CREDIT ISSUED INTEREST PAID ON SAVINGS DEPOSITS OFFICERS GEORGE E. LAWSON, President J. R. BODDE., Asst. to Prest. and Asst. R. IS. 'MASON., Vice-President Cashier,;; F. A. 'SCHULTE, Vice-President CHARLES H. AYERS, Assistant Cashier JAMES T. KEENA, Viice-President ENOCH SMITH, Assist3Jllt Cashier AUSTIN E. WING, Cashier R. T. CUDMORE, Assistant Cashier H. P. BORGMAN, ·Cashier Savings ,Dept. GEORGE T. COURTNEY, .Auditor R. w. SMYLIE, Mgr. Credits and Audits DIRECTORS Russell A. Alger Jeremiah Dwyer H. B. Ledyard T. H. Newberry George H. Baribour Frank J. Hecker J. T. McMillan Henry Russel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Biographies, Including Members of Congress, Elective State Officers, Justices of the Supreme Court, Members of the Mich
    Library of Congress Michigan biographies, including Members of Congress, elective state officers, Justices of the Supreme Court, Members of the Michigan Legislature, Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, State Board of Agriculture and State Board of Education ... 24-27004 Michigan Biographies INCLUDING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, ELECTIVE STATE OFFICERS, JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN A. D. MDCCCXXXV. VOL. III. L-Z Published by The Michigan Historical Commission Lansing, 1924 F535 .M62 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RECEIVED JUN 10 1924 DOCUMENTS DIVISION PREFACE. The sketches in this second volume, as in Volume I, end with the date of the last appearance of their respective subjects as public officers in Michigan. Since the material in the previous and present volumes is inaccessible except in the largest libraries, it is believed that the immediate publication of the material at hand in an edition large enough to supply all libraries in the state, will be appreciated by the general public and will take care of their immediate needs. Material is being gathered for a supplementary work which will bring the sketches forward. The gathering of this material is a considerable task and involves research in newspaper files, public records, and the carrying on of voluminous correspondence. To assist in gathering material for the supplementary work that will bring the sketches as near up-to-date as possible, the Commission has appointed a “Council of Michigan biographies, including Members of Congress, elective state officers, Justices of the Supreme Court, Members of the Michigan Legislature, Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, State Board of Agriculture and State Board of Education ..
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortti Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9201759 An artifact study of Harmonist patterned silk textiles, 1826-1852 Swinker, Mary Elizabeth, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1991 Copyright ©1991 by Swinker, Mary Elizabeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in Michigan Covington (Kentucky) Journal, February 22, 1852
    THE COURT Legacy The Historical Society for the United States District Court Vol. XII, No. 3 for the Eastern District of Michigan ©2004 November 2004 Special Annual Meeting Issue Michigan’s federal courts in enforcing the unpopular Michigan and the Fugitive laws on fugitive slaves. Slave Acts The Elliott/Heward Incident By David G. Chardavoyne The first reported incident in Michigan involving During the second quarter of the 19th century, the resistance to the return of fugitive slaves is anomalous attitude of Michigan’s white population towards slavery, because it occurred in 1807 and because it involved slaves, and black people in general was complex. On slaves who fled from Canada rather than from one hand, territorial and state American slave states. It is, laws barred fugitive slaves from nevertheless, worth reporting living in Michigan and required because it demonstrates both free blacks to register and post that anti-slavery sentiment a $500 bond;1 prohibited blacks existed in Michigan then and from voting;2 and barred inter- that, like later episodes, its racial marriages.3 Few white meaning is blurred by partisan Michiganders considered emotions unrelated to slavery. blacks to be their equals, and When Congress created the a majority agreed that the Michigan Territory in 1805, existence of slavery in southern slavery was common on both states was tolerable in order to sides of the Detroit River. In 4 preserve the Union. On the October 1807, territorial other hand, by the 1830s a attorney general Elijah Brush majority of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Underground Railroad and Kentucky Raid 6/10/2006 by Barbara and Grafton Cook
    The Underground Railroad and Kentucky Raid 6/10/2006 by Barbara and Grafton Cook Introduction Imagine my surprise in doing genealogical research to discover that my Martin ancestors, who later settled in Berrien County, had a sugar plantation in Antigua in the West Indies and extensively used slaves. My several times, great- grandfather, Samuel Martin, wrote and published a book on “plantership”-farming in the Caribbean utilizing slave labor in raising and processing sugar cane into sugar, molasses and rum. In December 1701, Samuel Martin asked his slaves to work on Christmas Day-an established 3-day holiday that included much eating, drinking and dancing. Beef, provided for the slaves by the plantation owner, was only eaten at this time of year. After working on that Christmas day his slaves rebelled and killed him. As a result my interest in slavery and the slave trade was kindled, and I began to read and study about the African Americans’ forced migration to and subsequent life in the Americas. My research on this topic has taken me about four years and included trips to Antigua, England, and Canada as well as many libraries and museums in this country. Grif and I have received assistance from many people in our endeavors to unravel the facts of a socially-sensitive and seemingly “moving target,” whose interpretation changes with each generation. Tonight we will briefly review the history of slavery, the Underground Railroad, the raids by men from Kentucky to recapture their runaway slaves, and the legal cases and legislative action that resulted. We will also share some stories of the people involved with the UGRR.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Documents
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS "DEAR DELICIAE—A YOUNG MINISTER'S LOVELETTER, 1823 writer of this letter was a young minister of the Associate Pres- Thebyterian Church just out of the theological seminary at Canons- burg1 and engaged in his first tour of the frontier as a missionary preacher or "supply." He was the Reverend— Daniel McLane, born near Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, in 1792 according to tradition, the son of William McLane, an early settler of Washington County. The girl of eighteen who received the letter was his cousin Nancy, the daughter of the Reverend Daniel McLean, Sr., of South Shenango, Crawford County, who, like his nephew and namesake, was also a minister of the Associate Church. 2 At the time of writing this letter, the younger McLane was in.Xenia, Ohio, about half-way through the long tour of duty that was taking him from Venango County, Pennsylvania, to Blount County, Tennessee. Be- fore setting out from Pennsylvania he had apparently made a visit to his uncle's at South Shenango, and the stay there had renewed his acquaint- 1 The references in regard to Daniel McLane's education are contradictory. The Cata- logue of Officers and Alumni and Students of the Associate Theological Seminary, 6 (Pittsburgh, 1854), lists him as having studied at Canonsburg instead of at Service, but William M. Glasgow, A Cyclopedic Manual of the United Presbyterian Churchy 234-235 (Pittsburgh, 1903), gives Service only. It may be that he attended both places, as he could have begun his studies in 18 19, the last year of the courses at Service, and then have continued in 1821-22 when the seminary at Canonsburg was opened.
    [Show full text]