DOCSLIB.ORG

Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ecosystem Profile MEDITERRANEAN BASIN BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT 2010 Prepared by: Doğa Derneği on behalf of BirdLife International in collaboration with: Association “Les Amis des Oiseaux,” BirdLife Global Secretariat, BirdLife International Middle East Division, IUCN, Plantlife International, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sociedad Española de Ornitología, Sociedade Portuguesa Para O Estudo Das Aves, The Cirrus Group, Tour du Valat and with the technical support of: Conservation International Africa and Madagascar Division Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Abdulmalak, Dania; Al Khader, Ibrahim; Al Jbour, Sharif; Arcos, José Manuel; Ataol, Murat; Azafzaf, Hichem; Balkız, Özge; Costa, Luis; Criado, Juan; Eken, Güven; Feltrup-Azafzaf, Claudia; Foxall, Jack; Galewski, Thomas; García-Tapia, Gerardo; Grillas, Patrick; Grimmett, Richard; İsfendiyaroğlu, Süreyya; Jalbert, Jean; Knowles, Tony; Knox, David H.; Kurt, Bahtiyar; Leitão, Domingos; Lise, Yıldıray; May, Ian; Pienaar, Eugene; Radford, Elizabeth; Ramirez, Ivan; Regato, Pedro; Tavares, Jose; and Viada, Carlota Assisted by experts and contributors from the following institutions: Al Quds University, Palestinian Territories IUCN Mediterranean Islands Plant Specialist Alfateh University, Libya Group Algerian General Directorate of Forests Jordan University of Science and Technology, American University of Beirut, Lebanon Jordan Association Biom, Croatia Lebanese University, Lebanon Biosfera 1, Cape Verde Lega Italiana Protezione Uccelli, Italy BirdLife Cyprus Libyan Environment General Authority BirdLife Malta Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux, BirdLife BirdLife Slovenia - DOPPS partner in France Burfield, Ian Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Turkey Center for Protection and Research of Birds of Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Water Montenegro Administration, Albania Centre for Middle Eastern Plants, UK Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environmental Conservatoire du Littoral, France Protection, Montenegro Croatian State Institute for Nature Protection Montenegro National Institute for the Protection Croatian Ministry of Culture of Nature Cuttelod, Annabelle National Agronomic Institute, Tunisia Diava Consulting, Albania Nature Conservation Egypt, BirdLife partner in Direcção-Geral de Ambiente, Cape Verde Egypt Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency Plan Bleu European Commission, DG Environment Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Forest Research Center, Morocco Areas Greek Biotope Wetland Centre Regional Environmental Center Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature, Hellenic Ornithological Society, Greece Jordan Interuniversity Research Center, “Biodiversity, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK plant sociology and landscape ecology,” Rubicon Foundation Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy Save Foundation Instituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, Italy SEO/BirdLife Program Morocco Instituto Nacional de Investigação e Society for the Protection of Nature in Lebanon Desenvolvimento Agrário, Cape Verde Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, FYROM Istanbul University, Turkey Syrian Ministry of Environmental Affairs IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation Syrian Society for Conservation of Wildlife ii Tanta University, Egypt University of Primorska, Slovenia TEMA Foundation, Turkey University of Reading, UK The Mediterranean Wetlands Initiative University of Sciences and Technology, Algeria The Royal Society for the Conservation of University of Venice, Italy Nature, UK University of Zagreb, Croatia Tunisian National Environmental Protection Vulture Conservation Foundation Agency Wetlands International Université de Béjaïa, Algeria WWF Mediterranean Program Office Université Hassen II Casablanca, Morocco WWF Mediterranean Program Morocco Office Université Mohammed V Agdal Institut WWF Tunisia Office Scientifique, Morocco WWF Turkey Office Université Mouay Ismail Meknes, Morocco University of Jordan, Jordan University of Montenegro, Montenegro This profile was produced with the financial and technical support of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and MAVA Fondation pour la Nature iii CONTENTS Executive Summary ……………………………………………….…….………………………...v Introduction………………………………….…………………………………………………….1 Background…………………………………….……………………….………………………….3 Biological Importance of the Hotspot…………………………………..………………………....4 Conservation Outcomes ……………………………..……………………………………………10 Socioeconomic, Policy and Civil Society Context………………………..…….………………..33 Climate Change Assessment…………………………….....………………….………………….67 Threat Assessment..........................................................................................................................75 Assessment of Current Investments…………………………….....………….………………….99 CEPF Niche for Investment in the Region…………………………......……………………….116 CEPF Investment Strategy and Program Focus…………………………......…………………..125 Sustainability…………………………………………………………………......……………..155 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………......…………..156 Logical Framework……………………………………………………….………….....……….157 References………………………………………………………………….…………….....…...160 Appendices………………………………………………………………….……………….......167 iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Humanity depends on Earth’s ecosystems and their life-sustaining benefits, such as provision of clean air, supply of fresh water and delivery of healthy soils. Founded in 2000, the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) has become a global leader in enabling civil society to participate in and influence the conservation of some of the world’s most critical ecosystems. CEPF is a joint initiative of l'Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the World Bank. As one of the founders, Conservation International administers the global program through a CEPF Secretariat. CEPF provides grants for nongovernmental and other private organizations to protect biodiversity hotspots, Earth’s most biologically rich and threatened areas. The convergence of critical areas for conservation with millions of people who are impoverished and highly dependent on healthy ecosystems is more evident in the hotspots than anywhere else. CEPF is unique among funding mechanisms in that it focuses on high-priority biological areas rather than political boundaries and examines conservation threats on a landscape scale. From this perspective, CEPF seeks to identify and support a regional, rather than a national, approach to achieving conservation outcomes and engages a wide range of public and private institutions to address conservation needs through coordinated regional efforts. The Mediterranean Basin biodiversity hotspot is the second largest hotspot in the world and the largest of the world’s five Mediterranean-climate regions. The hotspot covers more than 2 million square kilometers and stretches west to east from Portugal to Jordan and north to south from northern Italy to Cape Verde. The Mediterranean Basin is the third richest hotspot in the world in terms of its plant diversity (Mittermeier et al. 2004). Approximately 30,000 plant species occur, and more than 13,000 species are found nowhere else, or endemic, to the hotspot; yet, many more are being discovered every year (Plantlife International 2010, unpublished report). Rivaling the natural diversity in the hotspot, the cultural, linguistic and socioeconomic diversity of the region is spectacular. The region contains some of the world’s first and greatest civilizations, the world’s oldest sovereign state and its first constitutional republic with San Marino dating back to 301 A.D. Many of the ecosystems reached an equilibrium long ago with human activity dominating the landscapes. However, this delicate balance is in a precarious state as many local communities depend on remaining habitats for fresh water, food and a variety of other ecosystem services. CEPF investment in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot is essential to stem the threats, balance economic development with the needs of natural areas, and conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services in this vast region. The Mediterranean Basin Hotspot Ecosystem Profile was developed under the leadership of Doğa Derneği (the BirdLife partner in Turkey) thanks to CEPF investment and the generous financial and technical support of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and MAVA Fondation pour la Nature. Twelve organizations worked collectively for the development of the profile, due to the exceptionally large size and complexity of the region. Key organizations within the profiling team, in addition to Doğa Derneği, include Conservation International, BirdLife International and its partners in the region, Tour du Valat, IUCN and Plantlife International. The ecosystem profile presents an overview of the hotspot in terms of its biological importance in a global and regional context, potential climate change impacts, major threats to and root causes of biodiversity loss, socioeconomic context and current conservation investments. It provides a suite of measurable conservation outcomes, identifies funding gaps and opportunities for v investment, and thus identifies the niche where CEPF investment can provide the greatest incremental value. It also contains a five-year investment strategy for CEPF in the region. This investment strategy comprises a series of strategic funding opportunities, termed strategic directions, broken down into a number of investment priorities
Recommended publications
  • Middle East Unit: Reading and Questions Part 1:​ Introduction Located at the Junction of Three Continents—​Europe​,​

    Middle East Unit: Reading and Questions Part 1:​ Introduction Located at the Junction of Three Continents—​Europe​,​

    Middle East Unit: Reading and Questions Part 1: Introduction ​ Located at the junction of three continents—Europe, Asia, and Africa—the region ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ known as the Middle East has historically been a crossroads for conquerors, peoples, trade, and ideas as well as a transition zone for political and cultural interaction. Today the Middle East’s strategic location as a tricontinental hub, its vast petroleum reserves, its importance to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, and its many political disputes give it a global significance out of proportion to its size. The Middle East is a culturally, politically, and economically diverse region that extends for some 5,000 miles (8,000 kilometers) from west to east and some 2,000 miles (3,200 kilometers) from north to south. It is made up of several countries located on or near the southern and eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Although definitions vary, it is generally understood to encompass Egypt, Lebanon, ​ ​ ​ ​ Syria, Jordan, Israel, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, Iran, Iraq, and the Arabian ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Peninsula, which comprises Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, the United Arab ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. The part of the region closest to Europe ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ formerly was known as the Near East, and some agencies still use that term instead of the Middle East to describe the entire region. 1. What are the 3 continents that house the “Middle East”? 2. What are they known for? 3. Label your map with the countries and bodies of waters in this text. Color the waters blue and the countries each a different color.
  • Distrito Carabanchel

    Distrito Carabanchel

    Bellas Vistas Elaborado por el Servicio de Convivencia Intercultural en Barrios 19/06/2015 Contenido A. CARACTERISTICAS GENERALES DEL DISTRITO. ..................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 1. Descripción Espacial del Distrito. ......................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 2. Historia del Distrito. ............................................................................................................ 4 3. Análisis Socio-Demográfico. ................................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 4. Economía del Distrito ........................................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 5. Datos Comparativos sobre Empleo y Desempleo ................ ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 6. Educación, Cultura y Deporte .............................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 7. Infancia y Adolescencia ........................................................ ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 8. Salud Comunitaria ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….24 9. Historia Administrativo y Participación Política …………………………………………………………..25 B. CARACTERÍSTICAS GENERALES DEL BARRIO BELLAS VISTAS ............................................ 31 1. Delimitación espacial: barrio administrativo, barrio sentido. .......................................... 31 2. Historia del barrio.............................................................................................................. 33 3. Análisis socio-demográfico ..................................................
  • Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W

    Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W

    CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) 1 1.2 THE NITRATES DIRECTIVE (91/676/EEC) 3 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2 THE OFFICIAL GREEK DESIGNATION PROCESS 9 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION IN GREECE 9 2.2 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS 10 2.3 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF VULNERABLE ZONES 14 1 INTRODUCTION This report is a review of the areas designated as Sensitive Areas in conformity with the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC and Vulnerable Zones in conformity with the Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC in Greece. The review also includes suggestions for further areas that should be designated within the scope of these two Directives. Although the two Directives have different objectives, the areas designated as sensitive or vulnerable are reviewed simultaneously because of the similarities in the designation process. The investigations will focus upon: • Checking that those waters that should be identified according to either Directive have been; • in the case of the Nitrates Directive, assessing whether vulnerable zones have been designated correctly and comprehensively. The identification of vulnerable zones and sensitive areas in relation to the Nitrates Directive and Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive is carried out according to both common and specific criteria, as these are specified in the two Directives. 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) The Directive concerns the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater as well as biodegradable wastewater from certain industrial sectors. The designation of sensitive areas is required by the Directive since, depending on the sensitivity of the receptor, treatment of a different level is necessary prior to discharge.
  • Collection of Plastics from the Environment and Their Potential Usage: Mapping Actions in Greece

    Collection of Plastics from the Environment and Their Potential Usage: Mapping Actions in Greece

    Collection of plastics from the environment and their potential usage: Mapping actions in Greece Kikaki A., Kastanidi E., Pagou, K., Karageorgis A. Institute of Oceanography Hellenic Centre for Marine Research 7th Group of Senior Officials - GSO BLUEMED WG remote meeting 10 December 2020 Actions recorded for the period 2018-2020 Beach & Underwater Clean-ups Education Marine Litter Collection Stations Circular Economy Plastic Free Islands Initiatives Data (non-exhaustive) were collected from the Internet as well as by personal communication with Clean-Ups Organizers BLUEMED PILOT – Greek Hub • The data were collected as part of the actions of the Greek hub to combat plastic pollution in Greece • Mapping activities concentrated on recording data of public actions of beach and underwater waste removal and the identification of innovative opportunities for re- using collected waste • The extent of these actions show the importance of these citizen’s activities in addressing the plastic pollution problems. • The actions have been categorised into Beach clean-ups (waste collection), Waste quantification (i.e., weighing), Waste classification aiming to connect these actions with the MSFD protocols A contribution to: ‘Mission Starfish 2030: Restore our Ocean and Waters’ Facts • The EU coastline is 68,000 km long • Almost half of the EU population lives less than 50 km from the sea. In 2011, 206 million people, or 41 % of the EU population, lived in Europe's coastal regions (Eurostat). • Greece's coastline measures 13,676 km (the longest within EU 27 countries, second after Norway, followed by the UK) • Greek sovereign land includes 6,000 islands and islets scattered in the Aegean and Ionian Seas, of which 227 islands are inhabited.
  • Islands in Greece and Across the EU Pioneering the Energy Transition A

    Islands in Greece and Across the EU Pioneering the Energy Transition A

    Innovative technologies and regulatory schemes accelerating islands’ decarbonisation Islands in Greece and across the EU pioneering the energy transition 6 June 2018 | Alkisti Florou, DAFNI Network Welcome! Today’s event will… • Provide an overview of EU islands’ collaboration to accelerate Europe’s decarbonisation • Analyse regulatory frameworks in three island regions (Greek, Spanish, ORs) • Showcase lighthouse projects from frontrunner islands in the respective regions • Get perspective of key players, i.e. electricity sector and island regions • Present the scope of work of the Clean Energy for EU Islands Initiative Network of island local and regional authorities Non profit organization 40 municipalities; 3 regions Promotes sustainable development in Greek islands through integrated solutions in key infrastructures (energy, water, transport, waste) Founding member of the Pact of Islands initiative promoting sustainability in European islands through local energy planning Coordinator of the Smart Islands Initiative promoting islands as ideas test-beds for integrated natural resource and infrastructure management European islands’ collaboration 2011 2013 2016 The Smart Islands Initiative is a bottom-up effort of European island authorities and communities which seeks to communicate the significant potential of islands to function as laboratories for technological, social, environmental, economic and political innovation. Island Quadruple Helix Ecosystems A collaborative process of setting the Smart Islands Initiative into motion 28
  • Îles Grecques – Les Cyclades Et Athènes

    Îles Grecques – Les Cyclades Et Athènes

    Îles grecques Les Cyclades et Athènes Y VOIR L’ESSENTIEL M VIVRE LE MEILLEUR Marathonas Elefsina (Éleusis) ATHÈNES Megara p.46 Rafina Karistos Pireas (Le Pirée) SALAMINA + ANDROS ATHÈNES AU QUOTIDIEN / Gavrio L’ACROPOLE / Andros MUSÉE ARCHÉOLOGIQUE NATIONAL MAKRONISSI Egina G OLFE SA RONIQ Lavrio ANGISTRI UE KEA Korissia GIAROS Methana CAP Ioulida SOUNION P Poros É LO PO N POROS NÈ Ermo SE Merichas SYROS+ Hydra DOKOS KYTHNOS M SERFOPOULA E R D SERIFOS E Livadi M Y R T ANTIPAR O Kamares Apollonia CYCLADES OCCIDENTALES +SIFNOS DESPOTIK VELOPOULA p.164 KIMOLOS FALKONERA ANTIMILOS Plaka POLIEGOS Adamas MILOS Folegandros FOLEGANDROS+Karavosta TURQUIE E OP LES CYCLADES EUR ET ATHÈNES IRA GRÈCE ASIE AFRIQUE M E R É G É Gavrio ANDROS E Andros CYCLADES SEPTENTRIONALES p.98 GIAROS +TINOS IKARIA Tinos Mykonos Ermoupoli + SYROS+ MYKONOS RINIA + DELOS LA Naxos DONOUSSA Parikia + ANTIPAROS NAXOS s KINAROS Apollonia KOUFONISSIA +SIFNOS PAROS KEROS DESPOTIKO +AMORGOS IRAKLIA Katapola Amorgos SCHINOUSSA LIEGOS SIKINOS IOS Ios Kastro Alopronia Folegandros ANUDROS ANDROS+Karavostassis ASTIPALEA CYCLADES ORIENTALES p.206 Oia FIRASSIA ANAFI Fira + Anafi SANTORIN CHRISTIANI N 25 km Îles grecques Les Cyclades et Athènes BIENVENUE DANS LES… es maisons chaulées de blanc dégringolant d’une colline, vers une mer d’un bleu aussi D intense que l’azur du ciel… Voici l’image éternelle des Cyclades, archipel aux 250 îles de toutes tailles disséminées dans la mer Égée. Chacune pourrait être une perle d’un komboloï, ce chapelet grec dont le nœud de fixation serait Athènes, la capitale, berceau culturel de l’Europe, sur laquelle veille la silhouette mythique de l’Acropole.
  • The Current Organization and Administration Situation of the Secondary Education Units in the North Aegean Region

    The Current Organization and Administration Situation of the Secondary Education Units in the North Aegean Region

    ISSN 2664-4002 (Print) & ISSN 2664-6714 (Online) South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Abbreviated Key Title: South Asian Res J Human Soc Sci | Volume-1 | Issue-4| Dec -2019 | DOI: 10.36346/sarjhss.2019.v01i04.010 Original Research Article The Current Organization and Administration Situation of the Secondary Education Units in the North Aegean Region Dimitrios Ntalossis, George F. Zarotis* University of the Aegean, Faculty of Human Sciences, Rhodes, Greece *Corresponding Author Dr. George F. Zarotis Article History Received: 14.12.2019 Accepted: 24.12.2019 Published: 30.12.2019 Abstract: After analyzing various studies, we can conclude that the elements characterizing an effective school unit are leadership, teachers, and communication among school unit members, the climate of a school unit, school culture, the logistical infrastructure, the school's relationship with the local community, and the administrative system of the educational institution. The ultimate goal of this research is to detect the current organization and administration situation of secondary education units. In particular, to examine the concept of education, the school role and the concept of effective school, to identify the existing model of administration of the educational system, the organization and administration models of the school unit in which the respondents work, and furthermore the school culture level. The method adopted for the study is the classified cluster sampling method. According to this method, clusters are initially defined, which in this case are Secondary School Units. The clusters are then classified according to their characteristics, which in this case was the geographical feature: they all belonged to the North Aegean Region.
  • Aachen, 590,672

    Aachen, 590,672

    INDEX THIS Index contains no reference to the Introductory Tables which pre· sent a summary of the Finance and Commerce of the United Kingdom, British India, the British Colonies, the various countries of Europe, the United States of America, and Japan. AAC AFR ACHEN, 590,672 Adrar, 815, 1041 A Aalborg, 491 Adrianople (town), 1097 Aalesund, 1062 - (Vilayet), 1096 Aargau, 1078, 1080 Adua, 337 Aarhus, 491 Adulis Bay, 569 Abaco (Bahamas), 244 lEtolia, 705 Abbas Hilmi, Khedive, 1122 Afghanistan, area, 339 Abdul-Hamid n., 1091 - army, 340 Abdur Rahman Khan, 339 - books of reference, 342 Abeokuta (W. Africa), 219 - currency, 342 Abercorn (Cent. Africa), 215 - exports, 342 Aberdeen, 22; University, 34 - government, 340 Aberystwith College, 34 - horticulture, 341 Abo (Finland), 933, 985 - imports, 342 Abomey, 572 - justice, 340 Abruzzi, 732 -land cultivation, 341 Abyssinia, 337 - manufactures, 341 Abyssinian Church, 337, 1127 - mining, 341 Ahuna (Coptic), 337 - origin of the Afghans, 339 Acajutla (Salvador), 998 - population, 340 Acanceh (Mexico), 799 - reigning sovereign, 339 Acarnania, 705 - revenue, 340 Accra, 218 - trade, 341 Achaia, 705 - trade routes, 341 .Achikulak, 933 Africa, Central, Protectorate, 193 Acklin's Island, 244 East (British), 194 Aconcagua, 4.46 -- (German), 623 Acre (Bolivia), 430, 431, 437 -- - Italian, 768 Adamawa, 211 -- Portuguese, 909 Adana (town), 1097 -- South-West (German), 622 - (Vilayet), 1096 - (Turkish), 1095, 1097 Adelaide, 297 ; University, 298 - West (British), 218 Aden, 108, 129 -- (French), 569 Adis Ababa, 337, 769 -- German, 621, 622 Admiralty Island (W. Pacific), 625 -- colonies in, British, 180 Adolf, Grand Duke of Luxemburg, 796 -- colonies in, French, 556 1222 THE STATESMAN'S YEAR-BOOK, 1900 AFR AMI Africa, Colonies in, German, 620 Algeria, army, 530, 558 -- Italian, 768 - books of reference, 560 -- Portuguese, 907 - commerce, 559 -- Spanish, 1041 - crime, 557 Agana (Ladrones), 1200 - defence, 558 Agra, 135 - exports, 559, 560 Agone (W.
  • DESERTMED a Project About the Deserted Islands of the Mediterranean

    DESERTMED a Project About the Deserted Islands of the Mediterranean

    DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean The islands, and all the more so the deserted island, is an extremely poor or weak notion from the point of view of geography. This is to it’s credit. The range of islands has no objective unity, and deserted islands have even less. The deserted island may indeed have extremely poor soil. Deserted, the is- land may be a desert, but not necessarily. The real desert is uninhabited only insofar as it presents no conditions that by rights would make life possible, weather vegetable, animal, or human. On the contrary, the lack of inhabitants on the deserted island is a pure fact due to the circumstance, in other words, the island’s surroundings. The island is what the sea surrounds. What is de- serted is the ocean around it. It is by virtue of circumstance, for other reasons that the principle on which the island depends, that the ships pass in the distance and never come ashore.“ (from: Gilles Deleuze, Desert Island and Other Texts, Semiotext(e),Los Angeles, 2004) DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean Desertmed is an ongoing interdisciplina- land use, according to which the islands ry research project. The “blind spots” on can be divided into various groups or the European map serve as its subject typologies —although the distinctions are matter: approximately 300 uninhabited is- fluid. lands in the Mediterranean Sea. A group of artists, architects, writers and theoreti- cians traveled to forty of these often hard to reach islands in search of clues, impar- tially cataloguing information that can be interpreted in multiple ways.

  • Chronological Constraints of Pyroclastic Deposits on Anafi Island

    15th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece Athens, 22-24 May, 2019 | Harokopio University of Athens, Greece Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, Sp. Pub. 7 Ext. Abs. GSG2019-160 Chronological constraints of pyroclastic deposits on Anafi Island, (Cyclades, Greece): Are they Minoan? Katerina Theodorakopoulou1, Konstantinos Kyriakopoulos1, Kostas Stamoulis2, Magali Rizza3, Roberto Sulpizio4, M. Cihat Alçiçek4, Constantin D. Athanassas6 1 Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece, [email protected] 2 University of Ioannina-Archaeometry Center, Greece 3 Centre Européen de Recherche et d’Enseignement des Géosciences de l’Environnement, Aix-en-Provence, France 4 Department of Earth and Geo-environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy, 5 Department of Geology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey 6 Department of Geological Sciences, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece This study attempts to clarify whether formerly-documented pyroclastic deposits (Keller et al. 2014, McCoy and Dunn, 2002) belong to the Minoan eruption of Santorini or an earlier event. The ‘Minoan’ eruption, occurred in the 17th century BCE (1627–1600 BCE, Friedrich et al., 2006) and had widespread impacts on the civilization of the Aegean an Eastern Mediterranean (Marinatos, 1939). Anafi Island could be a key site for the dispersal of Minoan tephra as it is the most nearby island of Santorini. Despite its proximity, only a few spots with pyroclastic deposits have been found on the island (Keller et al. 2014, McCoy and Dunn, 2002). The occurrence of tephra layers of the Minoan eruption on Rhodes, Kos and western Turkey (Keller, 1980; Eastwood et al., 1999), suggests that Anafi must have covered by Minoan tephra, which was probably eroded and swept away afterwards (Keller et al., 2014).
  • Inmate Release Report Snapshot Taken: 9/28/2021 6:00:10 AM

    Inmate Release Report Snapshot Taken: 9/28/2021 6:00:10 AM

    Inmate Release Report Snapshot taken: 9/28/2021 6:00:10 AM Projected Release Date Booking No Last Name First Name 9/29/2021 6090989 ALMEDA JONATHAN 9/29/2021 6249749 CAMACHO VICTOR 9/29/2021 6224278 HARTE GREGORY 9/29/2021 6251673 PILOTIN MANUEL 9/29/2021 6185574 PURYEAR KORY 9/29/2021 6142736 REYES GERARDO 9/30/2021 5880910 ADAMS YOLANDA 9/30/2021 6250719 AREVALO JOSE 9/30/2021 6226836 CALDERON ISAIAH 9/30/2021 6059780 ESTRADA CHRISTOPHER 9/30/2021 6128887 GONZALEZ JUAN 9/30/2021 6086264 OROZCO FRANCISCO 9/30/2021 6243426 TOBIAS BENJAMIN 10/1/2021 6211938 ALAS CHRISTOPHER 10/1/2021 6085586 ALVARADO BRYANT 10/1/2021 6164249 CASTILLO LUIS 10/1/2021 6254189 CASTRO JAYCEE 10/1/2021 6221163 CUBIAS ERICK 10/1/2021 6245513 MYERS ALBERT 10/1/2021 6084670 ORTIZ MATTHEW 10/1/2021 6085145 SANCHEZ ARAFAT 10/1/2021 6241199 SANCHEZ JORGE 10/1/2021 6085431 TORRES MANLIO 10/2/2021 6250453 ALVAREZ JOHNNY 10/2/2021 6241709 ESTRADA JOSE 10/2/2021 6242141 HUFF ADAM 10/2/2021 6254134 MEJIA GERSON 10/2/2021 6242125 ROBLES GUSTAVO 10/2/2021 6250718 RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL 10/2/2021 6225488 SANCHEZ NARCISO 10/2/2021 6248409 SOLIS PAUL 10/2/2021 6218628 VALDEZ EDDIE 10/2/2021 6159119 VERNON JIMMY 10/3/2021 6212939 ADAMS LANCE 10/3/2021 6239546 BELL JACKSON 10/3/2021 6222552 BRIDGES DAVID 10/3/2021 6245307 CERVANTES FRANCISCO 10/3/2021 6252321 FARAMAZOV ARTUR 10/3/2021 6251594 GOLDEN DAMON 10/3/2021 6242465 GOSSETT KAMERA 10/3/2021 6237998 MOLINA ANTONIO 10/3/2021 6028640 MORALES CHRISTOPHER 10/3/2021 6088136 ROBINSON MARK 10/3/2021 6033818 ROJO CHRISTOPHER 10/3/2021
  • Fisheries Conservation and Vulnerable Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Open Seas, Including the Deep Seas

    Fisheries Conservation and Vulnerable Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Open Seas, Including the Deep Seas

    Fisheries conservation and vulnerable ecosystems in the Mediterranean open seas, including the deep seas Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP and RAC/SPA concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in the present technical information document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect UNEP views. © 2010 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 - 1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail: [email protected] This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non- profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without permission in writing from UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA. For bibliographic purposes this volume should be cited as follows: UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA. 2010. Fisheries conservation and vulnerable ecosystems in the Mediterranean open seas, including the deep seas. By de Juan, S. and Lleonart, J. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis: 103pp. Cover photo credit: - Juan Cuetos This document should not be considered as an official United Nations document.