DOCSLIB.ORG

(Bitou Bush) on Coastal Ecosystem Processes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Bitou Bush) on Coastal Ecosystem Processes University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2004 The impact of Chrysanthemoides monilifera spp. rotundata (bitou bush) on coastal ecosystem processes Elizabeth A. Lindsay University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Lindsay, Elizabeth A, The impact of Chrysanthemoides monilifera spp. rotundata (bitou bush) on coastal ecosystem processes, PhD thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2004. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/203 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The impact of Chrysanthemoides monilifera spp. rotundata (bitou bush) on coastal ecosystem processes A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy from the University of Wollongong by Elizabeth A. Lindsay B. Med. Chem (Hons) Department of Biological Sciences 2004 Thesis Certification Certification I, Elizabeth Lindsay, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment for the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Elizabeth A. Lindsay November 2003 Table of Contents Page Number List of Tables i List of Figures iv List of Abbreviations x Abstract xi Acknowledgments xiv CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 Plant invasions in Australia 2 Bitou bush 2 Control techniques and their implications 7 Litter decomposition 9 Invertebrates and weeds 11 Invertebrates and decomposition 13 Aims 14 Thesis format 15 CHAPTER 2: The affect of Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata invasion on decomposition rates and environmental parameters Introduction 17 Methods 19 Study area 20 Decomposition study 21 Statistical analysis 22 Leaf structure 24 Soil moisture 24 Soil surface temperature 25 Light transmittance 25 Results 26 Decomposition study 26 Decomposition constants 29 Leaf quality 32 Environmental Differences 33 Discussion 39 Environmental parameters 39 Decomposition rates 41 Leaf quality 42 Leaf litter invertebrates 43 Site variation 44 Conclusion 46 CHAPTER 3: Nutrient cycling and litterfall in coastal areas invaded by Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata Introduction 48 Methods 51 Study Sites 51 Soil nitrogen 52 Soil pH 53 Bulk density 53 Litterfall 54 Leaf litter layer 55 Leaf nutrient analysis 55 Nutrient loss from decomposing leaves 56 Results 57 Soil nitrogen 57 Soil properties 59 Leaf fall and ground litter layer 61 Leaf nutrients 65 Nutrient flux from decomposing litter 67 Discussion 74 Litterfall and the litter layer 74 Nutrient loss from leaf litter 76 Senescence 79 Soil nitrogen 81 Soil properties 83 Effect of nutrient enrichment 84 Implications for regeneration 84 Conclusions 85 CHAPTER 4: The affect of Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata invasion on coastal leaf litter invertebrates Introduction 87 Methods 89 Study Sites 89 Invertebrate sampling 90 Data analysis 91 Results 93 Invertebrate abundance 94 Taxa and species composition 105 Temporal variation 109 Discussion 111 Litter quality 113 Temporal variation 114 Spatial variation 114 Conclusions 116 CHAPTER 5: The impact of the herbicide Roundup® Biactive™ (glyphosate), on leaf litter invertebrates within bitou bush infestations Introduction 118 Methods 121 Study sites 121 Invertebrate sampling 122 Change in abundance 122 Community composition 123 Results 125 Changes in abundance of taxa 126 Community composition 129 Discussion 133 Direct toxic effects 133 Indirect effects 134 Rainfall and temperature 135 Conclusions 137 CHAPTER 6: Conclusions 138 REFERENCES 142 APPENDIX Newton iteration technique 168 i List of Tables Page number Table 2.1: Summary of the soil and vegetation characteristics of each field 20 site. Table 2.2: Summary of a four-factor ANOVA for each field site for the 28 mean mass lost of C. monilifera and native leaves with time. The leaves were either in coarse or fine litterbags (Bag type) in a C. monilifera infested area or a native un-infested area (Weed) Table 2.3. The mean percent original mass remaining for all time periods, 29 for each leaf type within each habitat at each site. Table 2.4. The decomposition constants (k) for the single and double 30 exponential decay models. The regression coefficients (R2) for the double exponential decay model were calculated from observed vs. predicted values. Table 2.5. The mean initial leaf carbon and nitrogen concentrations of each 32 species, and the native leaf mixture, ± one standard error Table 2.6: The percent moisture and physical leaf parameters for each 33 species. Table 2.7: Summary of a two-factor ANOVA, performed to determine the 34 difference in soil moisture between the C. monilifera infested areas and native un-infested areas at each site. Table 2.8: Summary of a three-factor ANOVA performed to determine the 36 difference in soil surface temperatures at day (6am-5pm) and night (6pm- 5am) within the C. monilifera invaded and native area at each site. Table 2.9: Summary of a two-factor ANOVA performed to determine the 38 difference in percent light transmittance between C. monilifera infested and native areas at each site ii Table 3.1: Summary of the two factor ANOVA results performed to determine 57 the difference in total soil nitrogen concentration between native and C. monilifera invaded areas at each site. P<0.05 significance level. Table 3.2: Summary of the two factor ANOVA results performed to determine 58 the difference in soil ammonia and nitrate concentration between native and C. monilifera invaded areas at each site. P<0.05 significance level. Table 3.3. Summary of a two factor ANOVA performed to determine the 60 difference in soil bulk density between native and C. monilifera areas at each site. P<0.05 significance level. Table 3.4: Summary of the three factor ANOVA performed to determine the 64 difference in total ground litter weight per metre squared and leaf weight per metre squared between native and C. monilifera (weed) invaded areas. P<0.05 significance level Table 3.5: The nutrient content of green leaves (± one standard error) and the 66 carbon to nutrient ratios. Table 3.6: The nutrient content of abscised leaves (± one standard error) and 66 the carbon to nutrient ratios. Table 3.7: The approximate annual nutrient input from the leaf fall from the 67 three dominant species in the native areas and C. monilifera in the weed infested areas. Table 4.1: The number of beetle morphospecies identified. Selected 92 morphospecies were first classified to family or superfamily before being identified further. iii Table 4.2: Summary of the ANOVA for total abundance, number of taxa and 95 abundance of certain orders and classes. P>0.05 significance level. Significant results are in bold. Table 4.3: Summary of the ANOVA for total abundance per gram of litter and 97 total number of taxa per gram of litter. P>0.05 significance level. Significant results are in bold. Table 4.4: The ANOSIM results for each site testing for differences between 97 native and C. monilifera areas at each collection time. Data was either square root or presence/ absence transformed. P=0.05 significance level. Table 4.5: The average dissimilarity between the invertebrate assemblages 99 within the native and C. monilifera areas of each site. SIMPER analysis was not performed on presence/absence data for Anna Bay as the ANOISM was not significant. Table 5.1: Summary of the unreplicated repeated measures ANOVA for the 125 abundance of each group analysed. Significant values are in bold. P<0.05 significant level. Table 5.2: Results of the analysis of similarity, comparing the before impact 130 time with the four after impact sampling times, for impact and control sites. Data were square root transformed. iv List of Figures Page number Figure 1.1: The distribution of C. monilifera spp. rotundata in Australia. 3 Map adapted from Weiss et al. (1998). Figure 1.2: a. Native coastal shrubland at Warrain Beach N.S.W, b. Bitou 6 bush infestation on Comerong Island, c. Bitou bush infestation at Anna Bay N.S.W d. A bitou bush flower. Figure 2.1: The mean percentage of the original weight remaining in small 27 and large litterbags in C. monilifera (bitou) and native un-infested areas, through time pooled across all sites. Error bars are one standard error. Figure 2.2. The fitted curves from a, the single exponential decay model for 31 the native leaf mix litterbags and b, the double exponential decay model for C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Biological Control Agents in an IWM Program for Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    The role of biological control agents in an IWM program for Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata (bitou bush) Royce H. Holtkamp1 Summary Bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata, is a native of South Africa, which was used extensively in Australia as a sand-stabilising plant and for revegetation of coastal areas mined for mineral sands. It has now become a serious environmental weed in eastern Australia, primarily of conservation areas, where it significantly reduces biodiversity. Since 1989, six species of insects have been released on bitou bush, four of which have established. These are having varied impacts on bitou bush with bitou tip moth, Comostolopsis germana, and bitou seed fly, Mesoclanis polana, being the most successful. An integrated weed management approach appears to be the best option for long-term sustainable control of bitou bush. This paper discusses the use of biological control agents in combina- tion with other control options such as strategic herbicide applications, fire, physical removal and revegetation techniques. Keywords: biological control, bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata, integrated weed management. The plant withdrawn. However, this action came far too late and by 1976 C. monilifera subsp. rotundata was naturalised Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata along much of the NSW coast. (DC.) T. Norl. (bitou bush), is a competitive environ- A survey conducted in 2001 by the NSW National mental weed of South African origin. It is primarily Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) has shown C. restricted to areas of summer rainfall (Parsons and monilifera subsp. rotundata to be present on 900 km Cuthbertson 1992) and infests coastal areas of southern (80%) of the NSW coastline and the dominant plant on Queensland, New South Wales (NSW) and Lord Howe over 400 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Bitou Bush (Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp. Rotundata) and a Seed fly (Mesoclanis Polana)
    Exploring interactions between cultural and biological control techniques: modelling bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata) and a seed fly (Mesoclanis polana) Darren J. Kriticos,1,3 Rachel M. Stuart1,2 and Julian E. Ash2 Summary Weed seed-production and seedbank dynamics have been a focus of attention for many biological control campaigns. This interest has perhaps been promoted by the recognition of the important role of weed seed dynamics in annual cropping systems, and frequent observations that seed production is markedly increased in ranges into which a plant is introduced, compared with rates in its native range. Seeds are the means by which most higher-order perennial plants disperse, and reestablish following disturbance. The role and importance of seeds in the population dynamics of weed popula- tions depends upon factors such as successional state of the invaded vegetation association, the distur- bance frequency, plant age at maturity, seed decay rate, and self-thinning patterns. The role of seeds and their predators in maintaining a plant population may be minimal, and decreasing the rate of seed production and the size of the seedbank may have only minor impacts on the population dynamics of perennial weeds. The interactions between cultural management techniques for bitou bush and its seed fly were explored using a process-based population dynamics model. The role of the seed fly in reducing the invasive potential of bitou bush and modifying the population reestablishment rates following distur- bance were studied. The seed fly has substantially reduced seed production, but the effect of the fly on canopy cover of bitou bush and on its invasion potential appears negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Attempt to Introduce the Lacy-Winged Seed Fly Mesoclanis Magnipalpis to Australia for Biological Control of Boneseed Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    Seventeenth Australasian Weeds Conference A new attempt to introduce the lacy-winged seed fly Mesoclanis magnipalpis to Australia for biological control of boneseed Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera Tom Morley Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 48, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary Mesoclanis magnipalpis Bezzi (lacy- from subsp. pisifera would have a reasonable chance winged seed fly) is a tephritid fly whose larvae live and of establishing on bone seed in Australia. pupate in the flowers and developing fruit of shrubs of A possible explanation for failure of those in- the southern African genus Chrysanthemoides Tourn. troductions is that they represented a biotype of M. ex Medik (Munro 1950, Edwards and Brown 1997). magnipalpis whose life cycle was not synchronised Under glasshouse conditions Adair and Bruzzese with boneseed flowering and that this resulted in (2000) estimated it to have a development time (egg extinction between successive boneseed flowering/ to adult) of 47 (SD = 4.2, n = 2) days. M. magnipalpis fruiting seasons (Morley and Morin 2008). It may be is approved for use in Australia as a biological control that different biotypes of M. magnipalpis exist that agent for Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) T.Norl. C. utilise different Chrysanthemoides hosts exclusively monilifera comprises six subspecies (Norlindh 1943) and are incapable of sustaining a population on an of which subsp. monilifera (L.) T.Norl. (boneseed) alternate host. Another possibility for the failures is serious weeds in Australia and subsp. pisifera (L.) could be that the M. magnipalpis relies on multiple T.Norl. is restricted to South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Plant Invaders and Management Techniques on Native Communities : Ecological and Social Perspectives at Regional and Global Levels
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year Impacts of plant invaders and management techniques on native communities : ecological and social perspectives at regional and global levels Tanya J. Mason University of Wollongong Mason, Tanya J. Impacts of plant invaders and management techniques on native communi- ties : ecological and social perspectives at regional and global levels, PhD thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2007. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/629 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/629 NOTE This online version of the thesis may have different page formatting and pagination from the paper copy held in the University of Wollongong Library. UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG COPYRIGHT WARNING You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Impacts of plant invaders and management techniques on native communities: ecological and social perspectives at regional and global levels A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy from the University of Wollongong by Tanya J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Blue-Rinse Moth with the Secret Inflatable Hair-Drier, the Star
    1 The blue-rinse moth with the secret inflatable hair-drier, the star-spangled can-opener and other wonders of the wainscot world Robert Hoare *1 1 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, 1072, New Zealand New Zealand used to have an amazing radiation of Hadeninae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), beating anything the Australians have to offer by a trans-Tasman mile. Recent taxonomic shenanigans have resulted in New Zealand losing all its hadenines, but fortunately these have been replaced by exactly the same number of noctuines of the tribe Leucaniini. How many are there? In how many genera? What do their genitalia look like when squashed and mounted on slides? Why, oh why? All of these questions will be addressed, though not necessarily answered. 2 Patterns – and lack of patterns – in Thysanoptera host associations Laurence Mound *1 1 CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, 2601, ACT, Australia There is no direct correlation between the number of thrips species in an area and the number of available plant species, nor yet between the number of thrips species and the number of species in any given higher plant taxon with which those thrips are associated. Some plant taxa have a disproportionately large number of associated thrips species, yet other taxa are not exploited. Thrips species richness will be considered in relation to the relatively few plant species on which these insects are dependent. 3 Australasians behaving badly Up-Over: a downunder thrips killing an invasive New Zealand tree in California Jon Sullivan *1, Richard Hill 2, Laurence Mound 3, Stephen Cameron 3, Cynthia King 4 1 Bio-Protection Research Centre, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Christchurch, NZ 2 Richard Hill and Associates, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, NZ 3 CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, PO Box 1700 Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia 4 DLNR - Forestry & Wildlife Native Invertebrate Conservation Progam, 1151 Punchbowl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Biological Control Agent Mesoclanis Polana (Tephritidae) on Bitou Bush (Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    Bulletin of Entomological Research (2009) 99, 51–63 doi:10.1017/S000748530800610X Ó 2008 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom First published online 24 October 2008 Impact of the biological control agent Mesoclanis polana (Tephritidae) on bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata) in eastern Australia P.B. Edwards1,2 *, R.J. Adair3, R.H. Holtkamp4, W.J. Wanjura1, A.S. Bruzzese3 and R.I. Forrester5 1CRC for Australian Weed Management, CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia; 2Current address: PO Box 865, Maleny, Queensland 4552, Australia: 3Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 48, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia: 4NSW Department of Primary Industries, CRC for Australian Weed Management, 4 Marsden Park Road, Tamworth 2340, Australia: 5CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601 Abstract The seed fly Mesoclanis polana (Diptera: Tephritidae) was released in Australia in 1996. Its impact on seed production of bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata) was monitored at eight sites along the New South Wales coast from 1996 to 2004. Peak flowerhead production occurred in autumn (March to May); therefore, samples collected in May of each year were used to compare abundance and impact of M. polana across sites and between years. Latitude had a significant effect on abundance and impact of M. polana. By May 2004, 99.6% of flowerheads at the five most northern sites contained at least one egg, while 64% of flowerheads from the two most southern sites contained at least one egg. In May 2004, mean numbers of M. polana eggs per flowerhead were between 13 and 17 at four of the six northern sites and below two at the two southern sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Matching in the Colonisation of Biological Control Agents Against Chrys Anthemoides Moniliferø and Murrubium Vulgure
    Climate Matching in the Colonisation of Biological Control Agents against Chrys anthemoides moniliferø and Murrubium vulgure Craig R. Clarke Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology Facuþ of Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences University of Adelaide March, 200I DECLAIL{TION This work contains no material which has previously been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. To the best of my knowledge and beliet it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made, I give consent that this work may be photocopied or loaned from the University library. Signed Date 30 to ot Craig R. Clarke 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks to: o Ltzfor her support, love, encouragement, enthusiasm, understanding, proof reading and assistance with the counting of a seemingly endless number of insects. ¡ Dr Mike Keller and Dr Rick Roush for their support, enthusiasm and academic guidance a The CRC for Weed Management Systems and the South Australian Pastoral Board for funding the project. o Professor Steve Powles for encouraging me to undertake the PhD. a Petra Mueller, Penny Edwards and Jean-Louis Sagliocco for the collection of the insects from their native range. a Helena Oakey and Dr Ari Verþla for their assistance with the analysis of the plume moth field data. a Dr Marianne Horak from CSIRO, Entomology for her investigation into the taxonomy of the two bitou tip moth populations. a Robin Adair, AltneBruzzese, John'Weiss and Emma Wills from the Keith Turnbull Research Institute for advice about the rearing of the insects, assistance with the importation of the insect populations and information about past releases.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Bitou Bush: Just Around the Turn of the Millennium?
    Twelfth Australian Weeds Conference BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF BITOU BUSH: JUST AROUND THE TURN OF THE MILLENNIUM? Royce H Holtkamp1, Penelope B Edwards2 and Robin J Adair3 CRC for Weed Management Systems 1 NSW Agriculture, RMB 944, Calala Lane, Tamworth, NSW 2340 2 CSIRO Entomology, PMB 44, Winnellie, NT 0822 3 Keith Turnbull Research Institute, PO Box 48, Frankston, Vic. 3199 Abstract Bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera bitou bush to invade native vegetation was then rec- subspecies rotundata, is a native of South Africa, used ognised and its recommendation for coastal planting extensively in Australia as a sand stabilising plant and was withdrawn. However, by 1976 bitou bush was for revegetation of coastal areas mined for mineral naturalised along much of the NSW coast. Aerial sur- sands. It has now become a serious environmental veys of the NSW coastline were conducted by the NSW weed in eastern Australia, primarily of conservation National Parks and Wildlife Service in 1981 and 1982. areas, where it significantly reduces biodiversity. This These indicated that bitou bush was distributed along importance has been recently recognised with the list- approximately 60% (645 km) of the coast and was the ing of C. monilifera as a Weed of National Signifi- dominant species along 230 km. Since these surveys cance. A biological control program against C. its range has expanded and it has been predicted that monilifera was approved in 1987 and agent releases bitou bush has the potential to spread and occupy over commenced in 1989. To date, five species of insects 90% of the NSW coastline by 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • {Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation}
    Risk and efficacy in biological control: an evaluation of the aphid parasitoid Aphelinus certus in North America A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Joseph Matthew Kaser IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY George Eugene Heimpel (Advisor) September 2016 © Joe M. Kaser 2016 Copyright Permission Chapter 1 has been published with Current Opinion in Insect Science. Permission for use is granted by the primary author, Joe M. Kaser. Chapter 2 has been published with Biological Control. Permission for use is granted by the primary author, Joe M. Kaser. Acknowledgements There are so many people that have helped in small and enormous ways in the development of this dissertation throughout my time at the University of Minnesota, and beforehand. First, I must thank George E. Heimpel, my advisor and friend, who has always treated me as colleague even though he has been a mentor in the truest sense of the word. I have relied heavily on my PhD committee, Dave Andow, Emilie Snell-Rood, and Rob Venette, and I thank them for their generous help. I must also give a special acknowledgement to Mark Asplen, who I have learned so much from and who has been a great friend since I first moved to Minnesota. Additionally, I want to thank Amy Morey, Theresa Cira, Julie Peterson, Anh Tran, Jonathan Dregni, Milan Plećaš, JJ Weis, Mariana Bulgarella, Antonio Biondi, Roger Moon, Ralph Holzenthal, Ann Fallon, Bill Hutchison, Tim Kurtti, Ruth Shaw, Sue Galatowitsch, Susan Solarz, Ray Newman,
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Series 7 (.Pdf, 511.91KB)
    CRC for Australian Weed Management #7 Technical Series Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents Technical Series #7 • Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control Series #7 • Improving Technical Editors: H. Spafford Jacob and D.T. Briese CRC for Australian Weed Management #7 Technical Series Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents Proceedings of the CRC for Australian Weed Management Biological Control of Weeds Symposium and Workshop September 13, 2002 University of Western Australia Perth, Western Australia Editors: H. Spafford Jacob and D.T. Briese Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control Improving CRC for Australian Weed Management Technical Series no. 7 April 2003 Copyright © CRC for Australian Weed Management 2003 This book is copyright. Except as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth) and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication my be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Enquiries and additional copies: CRC for Australian Weed Management, Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia Telephone: (61) (08) 8303 6590 Fax: (61) (08) 8303 7311 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Em Moçambique Revista Eletrônica Acolhendo a Alfabetização Nos Países De Língua Portuguesa, Vol
    Revista Eletrônica Acolhendo a Alfabetização nos Países de Língua Portuguesa ISSN: 1980-7686 [email protected] Universidade de São Paulo Brasil Mello GARCIA, Flávio Roberto; Rombe BANDEIRA, Romana Biodiversidade de Moscas-das-Frutas (Diptera, Tephritidae) em Moçambique Revista Eletrônica Acolhendo a Alfabetização nos Países de Língua Portuguesa, vol. V, núm. 9, septiembre-febrero, 2011, pp. 24-44 Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo, Brasil Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=87916949003 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Mais artigos Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina, Caribe , Espanha e Portugal Home da revista no Redalyc Projeto acadêmico sem fins lucrativos desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa Acesso Aberto “ACOLHENDO A ALFABETIZAÇÃO NOS PAÍSES DE LÍNGUA PORTUGUESA” – REVISTA ELETRÔNICA ISSN: 1980-7686 Equipe: Grupo Acolhendo Alunos em Situação de Exclusão Social da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo e Pós- Graduação em Educação de Jovens e Adultos da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Eduardo Mondlane. (Via Atlântica: Perspectivas Fraternas na Educação de Jovens e Adultos entre Brasil e Moçambique). PROCESSO 491342/2005-5 – Ed. 472005 Cham. 1/Chamada. APOIO FINANCEIRO: CNPq e UNESCO Biodiversidade de Moscas-das-Frutas (Diptera, Tephritidae) em Moçambique Biodiversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Mozambique Biodiversité des Mouches des Fruites (Diptera, Tephritidae) au Mozambique Flávio Roberto Mello GARCIA Romana Rombe BANDEIRA RESUMO Os levantamentos das espécies de moscas-das-frutas, especialmente as da família Tephritidae, suas plantas hospedeiras e parasitóides são fundamentais para uma melhor compreensão da bioecologia desses grupos de insetos, dada sua importância econômica para a fruticultura mundial.
    [Show full text]