DOCSLIB.ORG

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Mrigal Cirrhinus Mrigala (Hamilton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FIR /S120 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No 120SAST - Cirrhinus mrigala - 1,40(02)025,03 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE MRIGAL Cirrhims mrig:(Hamilton, 1822) F Q FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS FISHERIES SYNOPSES This series of documents, issued by FAO, CSIRO, INP and NMFS, contains comprehensive reviews of present knowledge on species and stocks of aquatic organisms of present or potential economic interest. The Fishery Resources and Environment Division of FAO is responsible for the overall coordination of the series. The primary purpose of this series is to make existing information readily available to fishery scientists according to a standard pattern, and by so doing also to draw attention to gaps in knowledge. It is hoped that synopses in this series will be useful to other scientists initiating investigations of the species concerned or of related ones, as a means of exchange of knowledge among those already working on the species, and as the basis for comparative study of fisheries resources. They will be brought up to date from time to time as further information becomes available. The documents of this Series are issued under the following titles: Symbol FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. FIR/S CSIRO Fisheries Synopsis No. D FO/S INP Sinopsis sobre la Pesca N° IN P/S NMFS Fisheries Synopsis No. NM FS/S Synopses in these series are compiled according to a standard outline described in Fib/Si Rev. 1(1965). FAO, CSIRO, INP and NMFS are working to secure the cooperation of other organizations and of individual scientists in drafting synopses on species about which they have knowledge, and welcome offers of help in this task. Additions and corrections to synopses already issued will also be most welcome. Comments on individual synopses and requests for information should be addressed to the coordinators and editors of the issuing organizations, and suggestions regarding the expansion or modification of the outline to -FAO: FAO: CSIRO: Fishery Resources and Environment Division CSIRO Division of Fisheries and Oceanography Marine Resources Service Box 21 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Cronulla, N.S.W. 2230 Via delle Terme di Caracalla Australia 00100 Rome, Italy I N P: NM FS: Instituto Nacional de Pesca Scientific Publications Office Subsecretaría de Pesca National MarineFisheriesService, NOAA Secretaría de Pesca 1107 N.E. 45th Street Secretaría de Industria y Comercio Seattle, Wa. 98105, U.S.A. Carmona y Valle 101-403 México 7, D.F. Consolidated lists of species or groups covered by synopses issued to date or in preparation will be issued from time to time. Requests for copies of synopses should be addressed to the issuing organization. The following synopses in this series have been issued since January 1978: NMFS/S1 16 Synopsis of biological data on the red porgy, Pagruspagrus (Linnaeus) - C.L. Manooch III and W.W. Hassier 1978 NM FS/S1 17 Synopsis of biological data for the winter flounder Pleuronectes americanus (Walbaum) - G. Klein-MacPhee 1978 NMFS/S1 18 Synopsis of biological data on bonitos, Sarda - Yoshida 1979 F IR/Sil 9 Synopsis of biological data on the walleye, Stizostedion vitreum - P. Colby, R.E. Mc Nicol and R.A. Ryder 1979 FIR/S120 Synopsis of biological data on the mrigala, Cirrhinusmríga!a - V.G. Jhingran 1979 NMFSIS121 Synopsis of biological data on the striped bass, Morone saxati/is - E. Setzlev etal. 1979 NMFS/S122 Synopsis of biological data on Euthynnus - Yoshida 1979 NMFSIS123 Synopsis of biological data on the Rock crab, Cancer irroratus T.E. Bigford, 1979 1979 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 120 FIR/5120 (Distribution restricted) SAST - Cirrhinus mriqala - 1,40(02)025,03 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE MRIGAL Cirrhinus mriqala (Hamilton, 1822) Prepared by V.G. .Jhingran and H.A. Khan Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (LC.A.R.) Barrackpore, West Bengal India FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, September 1979 PREPARATION OF THIS SYNOPSIS The present document wasincluded in the FAO Species Synopsis Series in view of the growing importance of Cirrhinus mriqala in fish culture,especially on the Indian subcontinent. The details set out in thispaper are based on data collected by the authors in the course of their personal research work on the species andalso on information compiled from various sources, most of which are included in the reference list. Distribution Biblioqraphic entry: Authors Jhingran, V.G. & RA. Khan (1979) FAO Department of Fisheries FAO Fish.Synop., (120):78 p. FAO Regional Fisheries Officers Synopsis of biological data on the mrigal Regional Fisheries Councils and Commissions Cirrhinus mriqala (Hamilton, 1822) Selector SI Synopsis.Biological data.Freshwater fish.Taxonomy.Vernacular names. Morphology (organisms).Geographical distribution.Hybridization.Sexual reproduction.Life cycle.Development (biological).Autecology.Population characteristics.Inland fisheries.Fishing gear.Fishing grounds.Fishery regulations. Habitat improvement.Stocking (organisms). Fish culture.Freshwater aquaculture. Pond culture.Cirrhinus mriqala.Asia. FIR/S120 Cirrhinus mrigala iii CONTENTS Page IDENTITY 1 101 Nomenclature i 1011 Valid name i 1,12 Objective synonymy i 1,2 Taxonomy 1 1,21 Affinities i 1,22 Taxonomie status 3 1,23 Subspecies* 1,24Standard common names, vernacular names 3 1.3 Morphology 4 1,31 External morphology 4 1,32 Cytomorphology * 1,33 Protein specificity 4 2 DISTRIBUTION 8 2,1 Total area 8 2,2 Differential distribution 10 2,21 Spam, larvae and juveniles 10 2,22 Adults 10 10 2,3 Determinants of distribution changes 2.4 Hybridization 10 2,41 Hybrids 10 2,42 Influence of natural hybridization in ecology and morphology 11 li 3 BIONOMICS AND UFI HISTORY 3,1 Reproduction 11 3,11 Sexuality li 3,12Maturity (age and size) 11 3,13 Mating 12 3,14 Fertilization 12 3,15 Gonads 12 3,16 spawning 13 3,17 Spawn 20 3,2 Pre-adult phase 20 3,21 Embryonic phase 20 3.22 larval phase 20 3,23 Adolescent phase 32 iv FIR/S120 Cirrhinus mrigala Page Adult phase 3.3 33 Longevity 3,31 33 3,32Hardiness 33 3,33 Competitors 33 3,34 Predators 33 3,35 Parasites, diseases, injuries and abnormalities 33 Nutrition and growth 3,4 34 3,41Feeding 34 3.42Food 35 3043Growth rate 37 3,44Metabolism* Behaviour 3,5 41 Migration and local movements 3,51 41 Schooling 3,52 41 3.53Response to stimuli* POPULATION (STocK) 4 41 4,1Structure 41 4.11 Sex ratio 41 4.12Age composition 42 Size composition 4,13 42 4,2Abundance and density (of population)* Natality and recruitment 4.3 42 Reproduction rates 4,31 42 4,32Factors affecting reproduction* Recruitment 4.33 42 Mortality and morbidity 4.4 48 Mortality rates 4.41 48 4,42Factors causing or affecting mortality 48 Factors causing or affecting morbidity 4,43 48 4,44Relation of morbidity to mortality rates* 4.5Dynamics of population (as a whole) 49 4,6The population in the community and ecosystem 49 5 EXPLOITATION 51 5,1Fishing equipment 51 5.11Gear 51 5,12 Boats 51 FIR/S120 Cirrhinus mrigala y Page 5,2 Fishing areas 52 5,21 General geographic distribution 52 5,22 Geographical range 52 5,23 Depth range 52 5,3 Fishing seasons 52 5,31General pattern of season 52 5,32Dates of beginning, peak and end of season(s) 52 5033 Variation in data or duration of fishing season 52 5,4 Fishing operations and results 52 5,41 Effort and intensity* 5,42 Selectivity* 5,43 Catches 52 6 PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT 55 6,1 Regulatory (legislative) measures 55 6,11 limitation or reduction of total catch* 6,12 Protection of portions of population 55 6.2Control or alteration of physical features of the environment 55 6.21 Regulation of flow* 6,22 Control of water levels* 6,23 Control of erosion and silting* 6,24 Fishways at artificial and natural obstructions* 6.25 Fish screens* 6,26 Improvement of spawning grounds 55 6,27Habitat improvement* 6.3 Control or alteration of chemical feitures of the environment* 6.4Control or alteration of the biological features of the environment * 6,41 Control of aquatic vegetation 55 6.42Introduction of fish foods (plants, invertebrates,forage fishes)* 6,43 Control of parasites and diseases* 6.44Control of predators and competitors 56 6,45 Population manipulation 56 6.5 Artificial stocking 56 6,51 Maintenance stocking 56 6,52Transplantation; introduction 56 7 POND FISH CULTURE 56 7.1 Procurement of stocks 56 7,2 Genetic selection of stocks4 vi FIR/S120 Cirrhinus mrigala Page 703 Spawning (artificial, induced, natural) 58 74Holding of stock 58 705Pond management (fertilization, aquatic plant control,etc0) 59 7,6Feeding 63 77Diseases and parasite control 64 78Harvest 64 709Transport 64 8 REFERENOES 70 * These items have been omitted in the text as, either no information is available to the authors on them, or they are inapplicable to mrigal, the fish being exclusively a freshwater species0 FIR/S120 Cirrhinus mrigala vii LIST OF TABLES Table No Title Page I Standard common names, vernacular names 3 II Meristic counts of Cirrhinus mrigala 4 III Packed cell volume (pcv) haemoglobin and leucocyte counts of Cirrhinus 5 mrigala IV Mean and standard deviation of weight , blood of Cirrhinus mrigala 5 V Seasonal changes in the biochemical constituents in the blood serum of 7 Cirrhinus mrigala Va Distribution in rivers and lakes 9 VI Fecundity of mrigal from ponds at Cuttack 12 VII Fecundity of mrigal collected from River Yamuna at Allahabad 13 VIII Average fecundity of mrigal from River Godavari for different year classes 13 IX Characteristics of spawning grounds of mrigal 16 X Results reported by different workarson the
Recommended publications
  • Cirrhinus Mrigala (Hamilton, 1822)

    Cirrhinus Mrigala (Hamilton, 1822)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822) I. Identity V. Status And Trends a. Biological Features VI. Main Issues b. Images Gallery a. Responsible Aquaculture Practices II. Profile VII. References a. Historical Background a. Related Links b. Main Producer Countries c. Habitat And Biology III. Production a. Production Cycle b. Production Systems c. Diseases And Control Measures IV. Statistics a. Production Statistics b. Market And Trade Identity Cirrhinus mrigala Hamilton, 1822 [Cyprinidae] FAO Names: En - Mrigal carp, Fr - , Es - Biological features Body bilaterally symmetrical and streamlined, its depth about equal to length of head; body with cycloid scales, head without scales; snout blunt, often with pores; mouth broad, transverse; upper lip entire and not continuous with lower lip, lower lip most indistinct; single pair of short rostral barbels; pharyngeal teeth in three rows, 5.4.2/2.4.5 pattern; lower jaw with a small post-symphysial knob or tubercle; origin of dorsal fin nearer to end of snout than base of caudal; dorsal fin as high as body with 12 or 13 branched rays; last unbranched ray of dorsal fin non-osseous and non-serrated; pectoral fins shorter than head; caudal fin deeply forked; anal fin not extending to caudal fin; lateral line with 40-45 scales; lateral transverse scale rows 6-7/5½-6 between lateral line and pelvic fin base; usually dark grey above, silvery beneath; dorsal fin greyish; pectoral, pelvic and anal fins orange-tipped (especially during breeding season).
  • Threatened Species of IUCN Red List: Labeo Calbasu (Hamilton, 1822)

    Threatened Species of IUCN Red List: Labeo Calbasu (Hamilton, 1822)

    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2016; 4(1): 294-303 ISSN: 2347-5129 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.352 Threatened species of IUCN red list: Labeo calbasu IJFAS 2016; 4(1): 294-303 © 2016 IJFAS (Hamilton, 1822) with requirement of imperative www.fisheriesjournal.com conservational management from Lower Anicut, Received: 26-11-2015 Accepted: 29-12-2015 Tamil Nadu, India Mathialagan Ramasamy Post Graduate and Research, Mathialagan Ramasamy, Sivakumar Rajangam Department of Biotechnology, AVS College of Arts & Science, Salem-636 106, Tamil Nadu, Abstract India. The river of Cauvery has a large network of mighty rivers, tributaries and several crossing channels, offering immense scope for expanding fishery in Tamil Nadu, India. One of the branch river namely Sivakumar Rajangam Kollidam, Lower Anicut, were considered for focusing this study. Moreover, 110 species were live and Post Graduate and Research, breed in this river. Habitat alterations continue to have major impact on the distribution and abundance. Department of Zoology, Fishes of major rivers and feeder streams are perhaps least studied with poorest known natural resources. Government Arts College Family Cyprinidae was represented by the maximum number of species, richness and vast diversity. (Autonomous) Kumbakonam – Requirement of the power dams have drastically altered fish habitat, communities and blocked seasonal 612 002 Tamil Nadu, India. movement of pristine migratory fishes. On the other hand, catching the juvenile using the types of net with small mesh size and improper fishing management is going to depletion of the resources. Furthermore, information on the conservation status and distribution of freshwater fish Labeo calbasu in The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ has been extremely until recently.
  • Determination of Physico-Chemical Water Quality Parameters Along With

    Determination of Physico-Chemical Water Quality Parameters Along With

    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2019; 7(4): 93-100 E-ISSN: 2347-5129 P-ISSN: 2394-0506 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 Determination of Physico-chemical water quality (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.549 IJFAS 2019; 7(4): 93-100 parameters along with food preferences in selected Fish © 2019 IJFAS www.fisheriesjournal.com Species collected from River Ravi, Punjab Received: 06-05-2019 Accepted: 10-06-2019 Saman Nadeem, Kashifa Naghma Waheed, Muhammad Zafarullah, Saman Nadeem Department of Zoology, Virtual Muhammad Ashraf, Shahid Sherzada and Hira Nadeem University of Pakistan Abstract Kashifa Naghma Waheed The objectives behind the study was to understand the food preferences of the selected adult fish and the Fisheries Research and Training young ones, thereby providing information for culturing the preferred feeds under laboratory conditions Institute, Department of for future studies and requirements. The various fish species samples were dissected and analyzed for Fisheries, Punjab, Pakistan collection of microorganisms. The quality as well as quantity of microorganism species were analyzed with the help of Sedgwick-Rafter counting Chamber. It was observed that the microorganisms were Muhammad Zafarullah Fisheries Research and Training lower in number in the gut contents of fish samples collected from River Ravi due to higher levels of Institute, Department of contamination of water at the particular site. It was reasoned on the basis of all analytical results that Fisheries, Punjab, Pakistan Cirrhinus mrigala was found herbivorous while Channa punctatus was mainly found carnivorous; however, Oreochromis niloticus and Labeo boga both were found to be omnivorous. The present study Muhammad Ashraf revealed that the water quality of River Ravi possesses pollutants to varying extents which poses a Department of Zoology, Virtual dangerous threat to both human and aquatic lives.
  • ERSS Was Published in 2012 Under the Name Cirrhinus Fulungee

    ERSS Was Published in 2012 Under the Name Cirrhinus Fulungee

    Deccan White Carp (Gymnostomus fulungee) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, October 2012 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 5/31/2019 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Maharashtra and Karnataka in India; probably in other parts of Indian peninsula.” From Dahanukar (2011): “Cirrhinus fulungee is widely distributed in the Deccan plateau. It is recorded from Krishna and Godavari river system from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Record of this species from Cauvery river system (Menon 1999) is doubtful. In Maharashtra, the species is known from Mula-Mutha river of Pune (Fraser 1942, Tonapi and Mulherkar 1963, Kharat et al. 2003, Wagh and Ghate 2003), Pashan lake in Pune (Fraser 1942, Tonapi and Mulherkar 1963), Pavana River near Pune (Chandanshive et al. 2007), Ujni Wetland (Yazdani and Singh 1990), Neera river near Bhor (Neelesh Dahanukar, Mandar Paingankar, Rupesh Raut and S.S. Kharat, manuscript submitted), Krishna river near Wai (S.S. Kharat, Mandar Paingankar and Neelesh Dahanukar, manuscript in preparation), Koyna river at Patan (Jadhav et al. 2011), Panchaganga river in Kolhapur (Kalawar and Kelkar 1956), Solapur district 1 (Jadhav and Yadav 2009), Kinwat near Nanded (Hiware 2006) and Adan river (Heda 2009). In Andhra Pradesh, the species is known from Nagarjunasagar (Venkateshwarlu et al. 2006). In Karnataka, the species is reported from Tungabhadra river (Chacko and Kuriyan 1948, David 1956, Shahnawaz and Venkateshwarlu 2009, Shahnawaz et al. 2010), Linganamakki Reservoir on Sharavati River (Shreekantha and Ramachandra 2005), Biligiri Ranganathswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary (Devi et al.
  • NHBSS 045 2I Roberts Syste

    NHBSS 045 2I Roberts Syste

    NAT. HIST. BUL L. SIAM Soc. 45: 171-203 ， 1997 SYSTEMA TIC REVISION OF THE TROPICAL ASIAN LABEOIN CYP 悶 NID FISH GENUS CIRRHINUS ，WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES AND BIOLOGICAL OBSERV ATIONS ON C. C. LOBATUS 乃son R. Roberts* ABSTRACT Cirrhinus 訂 e lab ∞ in cyprinids of mainland 甘opic a1 Asia ， ranging from the In dus to southern southern China and the Mekong and the Tapi dr 出nage in peninsul 紅百四iland. Fourteen species 紅 e recog 凶zed in 白e present revision. lndia has five species ，Myanm 訂 four (including one endemic to Lake ln1 e) ，Th ail 加 d eight ，Cambodia ，Laos and Vietnam each have seven ，佃 d China only one. 百lree species are described as new: C. rubirostris frorn Tenasserim bωin ， southeast 巴rn Myanrn 紅; C. inomatus from lrrawaddy and Si 仕組g basins; 組 d C. omatipinnis frorn frorn the middle Mekong basin of Thailand. Th e replacement name C. lu is proposed for the endemic Inle Lake species C. horai (Banarescu ，1986) ， preoccupied in Cirrhinus by C. horai Lakshamanan ，1966 (a subjective junior synonym of C. cirrhosus). Cyprinus cirrhosus Bloch ， 1795 1795 is identified as the most senior synonym of Cyprinus mrigala Hamilton ， 1822; Cyprinus ariza ariza Buch 組 an ， 1807 as 血e most senior synonym of Cirrhinus reba (Har 凶Iton ，1822); 飢 d Le uciscus molitorella V a1 enciennes ， 1844 as 曲e rnost se 凶or synonym of Cirrhina chinensis Gun 由民 1868.τbus the va1 id names for 白ese species are Cirrhinus cirrhosus ， C. ariza ，and C. C. molitorella. Cirrhinus jullieni is a relatively rare species ，a1rn ost inv 副 ably confused with C.
  • Taxonomic Analysis of Rohu Labeo Rohita and Mrigal Cirrhinus Cirrhosus Populations in Bangladesh M

    Taxonomic Analysis of Rohu Labeo Rohita and Mrigal Cirrhinus Cirrhosus Populations in Bangladesh M

    J. Bangladesh Soc. Agric. Sci. Technol., 4(3&4): 29-32, 2007 ISSN 1811-6221 Taxonomic analysis of rohu Labeo rohita and mrigal Cirrhinus cirrhosus populations in Bangladesh M. Hasan, M. M. R. Khan and M. A. B. Siddik Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202 Abstract A study on the taxonomic analysis of three populations of rohu (Labeo rohita) and mrigal (Cirrhinus cirrhosus) was conducted sampled from three different sources of Bangladesh viz. Jamuna, Brahmaputra and Jalok hatchery in Mymensingh. The analysis was based on the morphometric and meristic data of the populations collected over a period of three months from March to May 2006. The fifteen morphometric characters of Jamuna population of both rohu and mrigal were higher than those of other two populations. Among nine meristic characters, six (BR, DFR, PvFR, AFR, SALL and SBLL) showed no differences in all the three populations. However, three meristic characters viz. number of pectoral fin rays (PcFR), caudal fin rays (CFR) and scale on lateral line (SLL) were found asymmetric in hatchery population of rohu, whereas number of pectoral fin rays (PcFR) and scale on lateral line (SLL) of hatchery population of mrigal were found different from those of the other two populations. Out of eight different body proportions, seven viz., total length:head length (TL:HL), standard length:head length (SL:HL), total length:high body depth (TL:HBD), standard length:high body depth (SL:HBD), head length:pre-orbital length (HL:Pre-OL), head length:post-orbital length (HL:Pos-OL) and high body depth-low body depth (HBD:LBD) showed significant differences at 5% level for all three populations.
  • Web-ICE Aquatic Database Documentation

    Web-ICE Aquatic Database Documentation

    OP-GED/BPRB/MB/2016-03-001 February 24, 2016 ICE Aquatic Toxicity Database Version 3.3 Documentation Prepared by: Sandy Raimondo, Crystal R. Lilavois, Morgan M. Willming and Mace G. Barron U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Ecology Division Gulf Breeze, Fl 32561 1 OP-GED/BPRB/MB/2016-03-001 February 24, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2 Data Sources ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 ECOTOX ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) ......................................................................... 4 2.3 Office of Pesticide Program (OPP) Ecotoxicity Database ................................................. 4 2.4 OPPT Premanufacture Notification (PMN) ...................................................................... 5 2.5 High Production Volume (HPV) ........................................................................................ 5 2.6 Mayer and Ellersieck 1986 ............................................................................................... 5 2.7 ORD ..................................................................................................................................
  • Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    SUBFAMILY Labeoninae Bleeker, 1859 - labeonins, labeos, algae-eaters, carps etc. [=?Paeonomiae, ?Apalopterinae, Platycarinae, Temnochilae, Labeonini, ?Plalacrognathini, Garrae, Gymnostomi, Rohteichthyina, Discognathina, Parapsilorhynchidae, Banganina, Osteochilina, Semilabeoina] Notes: Name in prevailing recent practice ?Paeonomiae McClelland, 1838:943 [ref. 2924] (subfamily) ? Cirrhinus [corrected to Paeonominae by McClelland 1839:225, 261, 264 [ref. 2923]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] ?Apalopterinae McClelland, 1839:226, 261, 299 [ref. 2923] (subfamily) ? Platycara [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Platycarinae Macleay, 1841:271 [ref. 32498] (family) Platycara [also Macleay 1842:204 [ref. 32499]] Temnochilae Heckel, 1847:280, 281 [ref. 2068] (Abtheilung) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Labeonini Bleeker, 1859d:XXVIII [ref. 371] (stirps) Labeo [family-group name used as valid by: Rainboth 1991 [ref. 32596], Nelson 1994 [ref. 26204], Yue et al. 2000 [ref. 25272], Zhang & Chen 2004 [ref. 27930], Li, Ran & Chen 2006 [ref. 29057], Nelson 2006 [ref. 32486], Zhang & Kottelat 2006 [ref. 28711], Zhang, Qiang & Lan 2008 [ref. 29452], Yang & Mayden 2010, Zheng, Yang, Chen & Wang 2010 [ref. 30961], Zhu, Zhang, Zhang & Han 2011 [ref. 31305], Yang et al. 2012a, Yang et al. 2012b [ref. 32362]] ?Phalacrognathini Bleeker, 1860a:422 [ref. 370] (cohors) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Garrae Bleeker, 1863–64:24 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Garra [also Bleeker 1863b:191 [ref. 397]; stem Garr- confirmed by Smith 1945:259 [ref. 4056], by Cavender & Coburn in Mayden 1992:322 [ref. 23260], by Mirza 2000:356 [ref.
  • Phylogenetic Analysis Among Cyprinidae Family Using 16Srrna

    Phylogenetic Analysis Among Cyprinidae Family Using 16Srrna

    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2014; 1(6): 66-71 ISSN: 2347-5129 IJFAS 2014; 1(6): 66-71 © 2013 IJFAS Phylogenetic analysis among Cyprinidae family using www.fisheriesjournal.com 16SrRNA Received: 20-05-2014 Accepted: 02-06-2014 Utpala Sharma Utpala Sharma, Varsha singhal, Dayal P. Gupta, Partha Sarathi Mohanty Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Abstract Dayalbagh Educational Institute, In the present study, the cyprinid fishes (Labeo rohita, Catla catla, Cirrihinus mrigala) of Agra region were Agra (282005), India selected for resolving their phylogeny. Sequencing of fishes were done using mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene and it was compared with other cyprind fishes on the basis of similarity. 17 sequences of cyprinid fishes Varsha singhal were downloaded from NCBI along with one out group of family Balitoridae as a root of tree. They were Department of Zoology, examined to construct the phylogenetic tree within the most diverse family Cyprinidae. The present study Faculty of Science, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, reveals the high rate of mutation in the fishes. The overall transition/ transversion bias R shows the high Agra (282005), India deviation from the neutral evolution where R= 0.5. In the phylogenetic tree the neutrality test is conducted which rejected the neutral variation. The negative values of Tajima’s D test shows the bottle neck effect Dayal P. Gupta whereas values of Li and Fu’S D* and Li and Fu’s F* test show excess of external mutation. The maximum Department of Zoology, parsimony analysis method shows the relation of Catla catla with subfamily Labeoninae and these are Department of Zoology, indicated through the bootstrap values.
  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)

    IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)

    The Festschrift on the 50th Anniversary of The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM Compilation of Papers and Abstracts Chief Editor Dr. Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Editors Prof. Dr. Mohammad Shahadat Ali Prof. Dr. M. Mostafa Feeroz Prof. Dr. M. Niamul Naser Publication Committee Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury AJM Zobaidur Rahman Soeb Sheikh Asaduzzaman Selina Sultana Sanjoy Roy Md. Selim Reza Animesh Ghose Sakib Mahmud Coordinator Ishtiaq Uddin Ahmad IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Bangladesh Country Offi ce 2014 The designation of geographical entities in this book and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication are authors’ personal views and do not necessarily refl ect those of IUCN. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from the World Bank, through Bangladesh Forest Department under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection Project’. Published by: IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Dhaka, Bangladesh Copyright: © 2014 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: IUCN Bangladesh. (2014). The Festschrift on the 50th Anniversary of The IUCN Red List of threatened SpeciesTM, Dhaka, Bangladesh: IUCN, x+192 pp.
  • Sequencing and Annotation of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome Of

    Sequencing and Annotation of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome Of

    Sequencing and annotation of the complete mitochondrial genome of a threatened labeonine fish, Cirrhinus reba Genome archive Mohammad Nazrul Islam1, Shirin Sultana2, Md. Jobaidul Alam3,4* 1Department of Biotechnology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, eISSN 2234-0742 Bangladesh Genomics Inform 2020;18(3):e32 2 https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2020.18.3.e32 Fisheries Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Biotechnology, Dhaka 1349, Bangladesh 3Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh 4Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Pukyong Received: June 1, 2020 National University, Busan 48513, Korea Revised: July 16, 2020 Accepted: September 1, 2020 The mitochondrial genome of a species is an essential resource for its effective conserva- *Corresponding author: tion and phylogenetic studies. In this article, we present sequencing and characterization E-mail: [email protected] of the complete mitochondrial genome of a threatened labeonine fish, Cirrhinus reba col- lected from Khulna region of Bangladesh. The complete mitochondrial genome was 16,597 bp in size, which formed a circular double-stranded DNA molecule containing a total of 37 mitochondrial genes (13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, and 22 transfer RNA genes) with two non-coding regions, an origin of light strand replication (OL) and a displacement loop (D-loop), similar structure with other fishes of Teleostei. The phyloge- netic tree demonstrated its close relationship with labeonine fishes. The complete mitoge- nome of Cirrhinus reba (GenBank no. MN862482) showed 99.96% identity to another hap- lotype of Cirrhinus reba (AP013325), followed by 90.18% identity with Labeo bata (AP011198).
  • Small Scale Mud Carp (Cirrhinus Microlepis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Small Scale Mud Carp (Cirrhinus Microlepis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Small Scale Mud Carp (Cirrhinus microlepis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, October 2012 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 7/11/2019 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Chao Phraya and Mekong basins in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Viet Nam.” Status in the United States No records of any wild populations or trade of Cirrhinus microlepis in the United States found. Means of Introductions in the United States No records of any wild populations of Cirrhinus microlepis in the United States found. Remarks No additional remarks. 1 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From Fricke et al. (2019): “Current status: Valid as Cirrhinus microlepis Sauvage 1878.” From ITIS (2019): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Cirrhinus Species Cirrhinus microlepis Sauvage, 1878” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Max length : 65.0 cm SL male/unsexed; [Baird et al. 1999]; max. published weight: 5.0 kg [Roberts and Warren 1994].” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Freshwater; benthopelagic; potamodromous [Riede 2004]” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Tropical; 19°N - 9°N, 101°E - 108°E” 2 Distribution Outside the United States Native From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Chao Phraya and Mekong basins in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Viet Nam.” Introduced No records of introduction of Cirrhinus microlepis were found. Means of Introduction Outside the United States No records of introduction of Cirrhinus microlepis were found.