DOCSLIB.ORG

Microlepidoptera.Hu 14 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Microlepidoptera.hu 14 2018 Anania funebris (Ström, 1768) © Fazekas I. 2018 Redigit Fazekas Imre Pannon Intézet | Pannon Institute | Pécs | Hungary 2018 Microlepidoptera.hu 14: 1–258. | 30.10.2018 | HU ISSN 2062–6738 DOI: 10.24386/Microlep.2018.14.1 A folyóirat évente 1–3 füzetben jelenik meg. Taxonómiai, faunisztikai, állatföldrajzi, ökológiai és természetvédelmi tanulmányokat közöl Magyarországról és más földrajzi területekről. Az archivált publikációk az Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár Elektronikus Periodika Adatbázis és Archívumban (EPA) érhetők el: http://epa.oszk.hu/microlepidoptera valamint REAL J | EBSCO A folyóirat, nyomtatott formában, a szerkesztő címén megrendelhető. Hungarian Microlepidoptera News. A journal focused on Hungarian Microlepidopterology. Can be purchased in printed form and in CD. For single copies and further information contact the editor. Szerkesztő | Editor Fazekas Imre E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.microlepidoptera.hu Szerkesztő tanácsadói | He's an advisor to the editor Ábrahám Levente (H-Kaposvár), Barry Goater (GB-Chandler's Ford), Buschmann Ferenc (H- Jászberény), Nowinszky László (H-Szombathely), Puskás János (H-Szombathely), Pastorális Gábor (SK-Komárno), Szeőke Kálmán (H-Székesfehérvár), Tóth Sándor (H-Zirc) Kiadványterv, tördelés, tipográfia | Design, lay-out, typography: Fazekas Imre Kiadó | Publisher: Pannon Intézet | Pannon Institute | H-Pécs Nyomtatás | Print: Rotari Nyomdaipari Kft., H-Komló Megjelent | Published: 2018.10.30. | 30.10.2018 A Microlepidoptera.hu archívuma | Archives of Microlepidoptera.hu: http://epa.oszk.hu/microlepidoptera http://www.microlepidoptera.hu REAL J EBSCO Minden jog fenntartva | All rights reserved © Pannon Intézet | Pannon Institute | Pécs | Hungary | 2018 Tartalom – Content Ötven év változásai a magyar Microlepidoptera faunában Bevezetés ……………………………………………………………………………..... 5 Anyag és módszer ………………………………………………………………..…...... 7 A kihagyott, törlésre került fajok okairól …………………………………………….. 8 A magyarországi molylepke-fauna gyarapodása…………………………………….... 8 Eredmények …………………………………………………………………………... 9 Néhány mondat az eredmények hátteréről ………………………………………….... 10 Visszatekintés az alapokat lerakó kutatókra ………………………………………….. 11 A jelenkor, akiknek leginkább köszönhető molyfaunánk 1968 utáni fajszám- gyarapodása ……………………………………………………………………….... 13 Külföldi (nem magyar) lepidopterológusok, akik munkásságukkal 2018 végéig szintén gyarapították a magyar molylepke-faunát …………………………………. 18 A magyar molylepke-fauna számszerű nyilvántartásából 2018 végéig kikerült, törölt fajok ………………………………………………………………………….. 20 A magyar molylepke-fauna tényleges gyarapodása 1968–2018 között ……..………. 37 Megjegyzések egyes faunára új fajokhoz ……………………………………………. 52 Az 1968-as fajlista után a magyar faunára újként közölt, de itt kihagyott vagy törölt fajok ………………………………………………………………………………... 56 Összefoglalás ...……………………………………………………………………… 62 Köszönet …..……..………..…………………………………………………………. 63 Irodalom ……………………………………………………………………………... 64 Alapirodalom ……………………………………………………………………….... 64 A magyar Microlepidoptera-fauna gyarapodását és egyéb változásait közlő irodalmi források Gozmány 1968-as fajlistája után ……………………………….. 64 A Magyarországon előforduló molylepke-fajok névjegyzéke, 2018 Bevezető …………………………………………………………………………….... 77 A családok jegyzéke az észlelt fajok számával ……………………………………..... 79 A családok, nemek és fajok jegyzéke ……………………………………………….. 79 Megjegyzések és kiegészítések a családokhoz, nemekhez és fajokhoz …………….. 171 Magyarország területéről publikált, de itt a névjegyzékből kihagyott fajok ………. 199 Új fajok a névjegyzékben ………………………………………………………….. 201 Irodalom …………………………………………………………………………...204 Névmutató …………………………………………………………………………... 232 Microlepidoptera.hu Journal info Name: Microlepidoptera.hu ISSN: ISSN 2062–6738 Journal DOI: 10.24386/Microlep First published: 2010 Frequency: one to three volumes annually Publication model: electronic and printed Publisher: Pannon Institute | 7625 Pécs, Magaslati út 24. | Hungary Digital Archiving http://epa.oszk.hu/microlepidoptera http://www.matarka.hu/szam_list.php?fsz=1205 http://www.microlepidoptera.hu REAL J and EBSCO Subscription 3000-5000 HUF/volume (in Hungary); 20-35 € / volume (in abroad) The periodical or individual issues can be obtained on the basis of exchange or via pur- chase. Please contact the Editor. Submission Deadlines: 31 March and 31 December. Editor: Imre Fazekas |e-mail: [email protected] A megjelent kötetek pdf-ben is elérhetők: http://epa.oszk.hu/microlepidoptera http://www.matarka.hu/szam_list.php?fsz=1205 http://www.microlepidoptera.hu REAL J | EBSCO A folyóiratot a MATARKA, a magyar folyóiratok tartalomjegyzékeinek kereshető adatbázisa dolgozza fel. A kéziratok benyújtásához, a formai előírásokhoz a szerzők részletes leírásokat találnak az Microlepi- doptera.hu honlapján: http://microlepidoptera.hu. A korábbi kötetek nyomtatott és CD formában a Pannon Intézet címén megrendelhetők: 7625 Pécs, Magaslati út 24. E-mail: [email protected] Microlepidoptera.hu 14: 5–76. | 2018.10.30. | HU ISSN 2062–6738 DOI: 10.24386/Microlep.2018.14.5 Ötven év változásai a magyar Microlepidoptera faunában Fifty years of changes in the Hungarian Microlepidoptera fauna (Lepidoptera) Buschmann Ferenc & Pastorális Gábor Abstract. Present paper introduces the changes in the knowledge on the Hungarian Microlepidoptera fauna of the last fifty years between the two milestone publications, from the first comprehensive checklist of Gozmány published in 1968 to the most recent list of Pastorális & Buschmann at 2018. The authors mention all species recorded from Hungary for the first time during this period and list those which have been omitted from the checklist due to various reasons. Short biographies are presented about the famous Hungarian experts of Mic- rolepidoptera, László Gozmány and József Szőcs whose work established the scientific basis of our knowledge about the Hungarian Microlepidoptera fauna, as well as about their most successful Hungarian and foreign fol- lowers. Summarising the above-mentioned changes the authors state that the latest catalogue of the Hungarian Microlepidoptera fauna published contemporarily by the authors of the present paper includes altogether 2313 species belonging into 57 families. Keywords. Microlepidoptera, Hungary, checklist, changes between 1968 and 2018. Author’s address. Buschmann Ferenc, H-5100 Jászberény, Lehel vezér tér 18. E-mail: [email protected] Pastorális Gábor, Košická 22/39, 94501 Komárno, Slovakia. E-mail: [email protected] A magyar molylepke-fauna fogyása és gyarapodása 1968 és 2018 között Bevezető Az 1955-től folyamatosan megjelent molylepkés faunafüzetek (Gozmány 1955, 1956, 1958, 1963, Gozmány & Szőcs 1965) kiegészített és helyesbített összefoglalójaként meg- jelentetésre került „Hazai molylepkéink magyar nevei” című munka (Gozmány 1968) Ma- gyarország molylepkéinek kutatástörténetében mérföldkőnek számított. Ez a fajlistaként is szolgáló, 1948 fajnevet tartalmazó névjegyzék bizonyos tekintetben évtizedekig segí- tette és vezette a molylepkékkel behatóbban foglalkozó magyar lepkészek tevékenységét. Különösen úttörő jelleggel bírt az által, hogy a szerző a magasabb rendű állatvilág gya- korlatához hasonlóan, a mai Magyarország államhatárain belül addig számon tartott 5 összes molylepke fajnak magyar nevet adott,1 s ezzel egyben hagyományt is teremtett. Ennek máig ható értékét az sem kisebbíti, hogy az időközben jelentősen kibővült ismere- tekkel és kutatási eredményekkel rendelkező internetes kapcsolatrendszerű világunkban olykor tapasztaljuk, akadnak az általa adott magyar nevek között javítandók. A névjegyzékben ismertetett tudományos fajnevek (Gozmány 1968) – beleértve az an- nak alapjául szolgáló és a Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum gyűjteményére alapozott faunafüzeteket is, – rendszertani és nevezéktani vonatkozásban a magyar neveknél sokkal hamarabb, már a megjelenésüket követő néhány éven belül jelentős módosításokra szo- rultak. A változások egy részét a szerző igyekezett a szóban forgó munkájában is követni, valódi okaira azonban csak a „Nevezéktani és taxonómiai változások a Magyarország Ál- latvilága XVI. kötetének 2–7. füzetében (Molylepkék – Microlepidoptera)” című összeál- lítása bevezetőjében (Gozmány 1985) tért ki. Az abban említett kutatói és feldolgozói te- vékenységek ma is folytatódnak. Az említett helyesbítő és kiegészítő dolgozat (Gozmány 1985) után egy évtizeddel jelent meg a nagy európai fajlista (Karsholt & Razowski 1996). Ennek hatására – és részben nyomán – szükségessé vált a magyar molylepke-nyilvántartás aktualizált módosítása is.2 A nyomtatásban ezt követően megjelent új magyar névjegyzékek (Fazekas 2002, Szabóky et al. 2002) viszont már más szemlélet alapján készültek. A palearktikus taxonómiai kuta- tások következtében több, abban önálló fajként szereplő fajnév még nem, vagy tévesen található bennük a feltüntetett szinonimnevek sorában, ugyanakkor olyanok is bekerültek, amelyek nálunk sohasem voltak alkalmazásban. Egyes fajok nevei pedig egyszerűen csak „kifelejtődtek”. Ezek lényegében indoklás nélkül „eltűntek” a magyar faunából. Mások viszont továbbra is bennmaradtak annak ellenére, hogy téves határozás vagy egyéb oknál fogva már Gozmány által törölve lettek (Gozmány 1985), továbbá olyan fajnevek is fel- tűntek, melyeknek irodalmi hátterét vagy a bizonyító példány(ok) hollétét – már, ha egy- általán voltak/vannak, – máig nem sikerült kinyomozni. E tekintetben a leginkább hasz- nálható faunalistának a
Recommended publications
  • January Review of Butterfly, Moth and Other Natural History Sightings 2019

    January Review of Butterfly, Moth and Other Natural History Sightings 2019

    Review of butterfly, moth and other natural history sightings 2019 January January started dry and settled but mostly cloudy with high pressure dominant, and it remained generally dry and often mild during the first half of the month. The second half became markedly cooler with overnight frosts and the last week saw a little precipitation, some which was occasionally wintry. With the mild weather continuing from December 2018 there were a small number of migrant moths noted in January, comprising a Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook on the 5th, a Silver Y there on the 13th and 2 Plutella xylostella (Diamond-back Moths) there on the 15th, whilst a very unseasonal Dark Arches at Hythe on the 4th may have been of immigrant origin. Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Dark Arches at Hythe (Ian Roberts) More typical species involved Epiphyas postvittana (Light Brown Apple Moth), Satellite, Mottled Umber, Winter Moth, Chestnut, Spring Usher and Early Moth. Early Moth at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Spring Usher at Seabrook (Paul Howe) The only butterfly noted was a Red Admiral at Nickolls Quarry on the 1st but the mild weather encouraged single Buff-tailed Bumblebees to appear at Seabrook on the 7th and Mill Point on the 8th, whilst a Minotaur Beetle was attracted to light at Seabrook on the 6th. A Common Seal and two Grey Seals were noted regularly off Folkestone, whilst at Hare was seen near Botolph’s Bridge on the 1st and a Mink was noted there on the 17th. February After a cold start to the month it was generally mild from the 5th onwards.
  • FOURTH UPDATE to a CHECKLIST of the LEPIDOPTERA of the BRITISH ISLES , 2013 1 David J

    FOURTH UPDATE to a CHECKLIST of the LEPIDOPTERA of the BRITISH ISLES , 2013 1 David J

    Ent Rec 133(1).qxp_Layout 1 13/01/2021 16:46 Page 1 Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 133 (2021) 1 FOURTH UPDATE TO A CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BRITISH ISLES , 2013 1 DAvID J. L. A GASSIz , 2 S. D. B EAvAN & 1 R. J. H ECkFoRD 1 Department of Life Sciences, Division of Insects, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD 2 The Hayes, Zeal Monachorum, Devon EX17 6DF Abstract This update incorporates information published since 30 November 2019 and before 1 January 2021 into A Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles, 2013. Introduction The Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles has previously been amended (Agassiz, Beavan & Heckford 2016a, 2016b, 2019 and 2020). This update details 4 species new to the main list and 3 to Appendix A. Numerous taxonomic changes are incorporated and country distributions are updated. CENSUS The number of species now recorded from the British Isles stands at 2,558 of which 58 are thought to be extinct and in addition there are 191 adventive species. ADDITIONAL SPECIES in main list Also make appropriate changes in the index 15.0715 Phyllonorycter medicaginella (Gerasimov, 1930) E S W I C 62.0382 Acrobasis fallouella (Ragonot, 1871) E S W I C 70.1698 Eupithecia breviculata (Donzel, 1837) Rusty-shouldered Pug E S W I C 72.089 Grammodes bifasciata (Petagna, 1786) Parallel Lines E S W I C The authorship and date of publication of Grammodes bifasciata were given by Brownsell & Sale (2020) as Petagan, 1787 but corrected to Petagna, 1786 by Plant (2020).
  • Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt

    Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt

    Accepted Manuscript Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China Kyu-Tek Park, Bong-Woo Lee, Yang-Seop Bae, Hui-Lin Han, Bong-Kyu Byun PII: S2287-884X(14)00025-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.japb.2014.04.007 Reference: JAPB 19 To appear in: Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity Received Date: 28 February 2014 Revised Date: 13 March 2014 Accepted Date: 4 April 2014 Please cite this article as: Park K-T, Lee B-W, Bae Y-S, Han H-L, Byun B-K, Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China, Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity (2014), doi: 10.1016/ j.japb.2014.04.007. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT J. of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China Kyu-Tek Park a, Bong-Woo Lee b, Yang-Seop Bae c, Hui-Lin Han d, Bong-Kyu Byun e* a The Korean Academy of Science and Technology, Seongnam, 463-808, Korea b Division of Forest Biodiversity, Korea National Arboretum, Sumokwokgil, Pocheon, 487-821, Korea c Division of Life Sciences, University of Incheon, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 406-772, Korea dSchool of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, P.R.
  • Moths of Poole Harbour Species List

    Moths of Poole Harbour Species List

    Moths of Poole Harbour is a project of Birds of Poole Harbour Moths of Poole Harbour Species List Birds of Poole Harbour & Moths of Poole Harbour recording area The Moths of Poole Harbour Project The ‘Moths of Poole Harbour’ project (MoPH) was established in 2017 to gain knowledge of moth species occurring in Poole Harbour, Dorset, their distribution, abundance and to some extent, their habitat requirements. The study area uses the same boundaries as the Birds of Poole Harbour (BoPH) project. Abigail Gibbs and Chris Thain, previous Wardens on Brownsea Island for Dorset Wildlife Trust (DWT), were invited by BoPH to undertake a study of moths in the Poole Harbour recording area. This is an area of some 175 square kilometres stretching from Corfe Castle in the south to Canford Heath in the north of the conurbation and west as far as Wareham. 4 moth traps were purchased for the project; 3 Mercury Vapour (MV) Robinson traps with 50m extension cables and one Actinic, Ultra-violet (UV) portable Heath trap running from a rechargeable battery. This was the capability that was deployed on most of the ensuing 327 nights of trapping. Locations were selected using a number of criteria: Habitat, accessibility, existing knowledge (previously well-recorded sites were generally not included), potential for repeat visits, site security and potential for public engagement. Field work commenced from late July 2017 and continued until October. Generally, in the years 2018 – 2020 trapping field work began in March/ April and ran on until late October or early November, stopping at the first frost.
  • Recording and Monitoring Rarer Moths in the Yorkshire Dales

    Recording and Monitoring Rarer Moths in the Yorkshire Dales

    WHITAKER (2015). FIELD STUDIES (http://fsj.field-studies-council.org/) RECORDING AND MONITORING RARER MOTHS IN THE YORKSHIRE DALES TERRY WHITAKER [email protected] Field notes on some of the Yorkshire Dales National Park’s rarer moths, and the activity of the Yorkshire Dales Butterfly and Moth Action Group in increasing our KnoWledge of their distribution and status. RESEARCH SUMMARY Yorkshire Dales Butterfly and Moth Action Group YorKshire Dales Butterfly and Moth Action Group (YDBMAG) started in 2002 as an initiative betWeen Butterfly Conservation, the YorKshire Naturalists’ Union and the YorKshire Dales National ParK Authority (YDNPA). Its aims and objectives are as folloWs: • To advise on habitat action plans affecting Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) Lepidoptera; • To devise species action plans for Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) Lepidoptera; • To monitor LBAP lepidopteran species. The folloWing initiatives have been promoted: • Increase public aWareness of LBAP species; • Increase KnoWledge of distribution of LBAP butterfly species; • Set up butterfly monitoring transects for LBAP species. These initiatives have included: • Setting up transects for small pearl-bordered fritillary and northern brown argus butterflies; • Surveys to discover the status and distribution in the YorKshire Dales National ParK (YDNP) of small pearl- bordered fritillary butterfly 2002, 2007-8 and 2013 and northern broWn argus butterfly 2002, 2007 and 2013; • Producing reporting postcards for common blue and green hairstreaK butterflies (2005-2007; 2006-2007); • Producing an identification guide to butterflies in the YDNP, With English Nature (WhitaKer, 2004); • Setting up transects in the small pearl-bordered fritillary and northern brown argus butterfly in the YDNP, by 2003. Currently, (2013), there are six UK butterfly monitoring scheme (UKBMS) transects in the YDNP.
  • Lajiluettelo 2019

    Lajiluettelo 2019

    Lajiluettelo 2019 Artlistan 2019 Checklist 2019 Helsinki 2020 Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. – Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Viittausohje, kun viitataan osaan julkaisusta, esim.: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, pistiäiset. – Julkaisussa: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Citerande av publikationen: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citerande av en enskild taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020. Hymenoptera, steklar. – I: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citation of the publication: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Citation of a separate taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, sawflied, wasps, ants and bee. – In: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
  • Microlepidoptera in Nederland, Vooral in 2007-2010 Met Een Terugblik Op 30 Jaar Faunistisch Onderzoek

    Microlepidoptera in Nederland, Vooral in 2007-2010 Met Een Terugblik Op 30 Jaar Faunistisch Onderzoek

    entomologische berichten 91 73 (3) 2013 Microlepidoptera in Nederland, vooral in 2007-2010 met een terugblik op 30 jaar faunistisch onderzoek K. J. (Hans) Huisman J. C. (Sjaak) Koster Tymo S.T. Muus Erik J. van Nieukerken TREFWOORDEN Faunistiek, nieuwe waarneming, provincies, areaaluitbreidingen Entomologische Berichten 73 (3): 91-117 In de jaren 2007-2010 werden maar liefst elf soorten kleine vlinders nieuw voor onze fauna gevonden: Infurcitinea teriolella, Bucculatrix ulmifoliae, Caloptilia fidella, Phyllonorycter issikii, Coleophora motacillella, Cochylis molliculana, Cnephasia sedana, Clepsis dumicolana, Lobesia botrana, Pseudococcyx tessulatana en Evergestis aenealis. Daarnaast werden drie soorten al elders gemeld: Caloptilia hemidactylella, Cydalima perspectalis en Bucculatrix ainsliella. Na 30 jaar van jaarlijsten geven we een evaluatie, met onder andere een totaal van 128 nieuw gemelde soorten. Dit zijn er minder dan in Denemarken, maar meer dan op de Britse Eilanden of in Zweden. We verklaren deze verschillen door het verschil in oppervlak van de landen: hoe kleiner het land, hoe meer kans dat er nieuwe soorten gevonden worden. Dit jaaroverzicht is het laatste dat in deze vorm verschijnt. Dit is het negentiende jaaroverzicht van de Nederlandse Micro- die beoordeeld konden worden door specialisten. We hopen dat lepidoptera sedert 1983. Een index van alle overzichten tot 2000 we een goed evenwicht gevonden hebben in het spanningsveld werd gegeven door Koster & Van Nieukerken (2003). tussen volledigheid en betrouwbaarheid. De jaren 2007–2010 waren wederom aan de warme kant met Door de snelle berichtgeving op internet wordt het voor het uitzondering van 2010, dat sinds 1996 het eerste jaar was met samenstellen van een gedrukte ‘jaarlijst’ steeds moeilijker om een temperatuur beneden het langjarige gemiddelde van 9,8°C voldoende actueel te blijven en toch de grens van een bepaald (jaargemiddelden 2007-2010 11,2; 10,6; 10,5; 9,1°C).
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
  • Pest Categorisation of Non‐EU Acleris Spp

    Pest Categorisation of Non‐EU Acleris Spp

    SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 25 September 2019 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5856 Pest categorisation of non-EU Acleris spp. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Francesco Di Serio, Paolo Gonthier, Marie-Agnes Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Alan MacLeod, Christer Sven Magnusson, Juan A Navas-Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Wopke Van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappala, Jean-Claude Gregoire, Virag Kertesz and Panagiotis Milonas Abstract The Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of non-EU Acleris spp. Acleris is a well- defined insect genus in the family Tortricidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Species can be identified using taxonomic keys based on adult morphology and genitalia. The genus includes 261 species attacking conifers and non-conifer plants in many areas in the world, among which 40 species are present in the EU. The non-EU species are collectively listed in Annex IAI of Council Directive 2000/29/EC as Acleris spp. (non-European). Some species are important defoliators in North America, mainly on conifers but also on several broadleaf trees. Females lay eggs on the leaves or on the bark. The larvae bind together with silk the leaves upon which they feed. Pupation occurs in leaves attached with silk or in the soil. Some species are univoltine; others are bivoltine or multivoltine. Flight capacity is not documented, but outbreak expansion suggests that the adults can probably fly long distances. The main pathways for entry are host plants for planting with or without soil, cut branches, fruits of host plants (including cones), round wood with bark and bark.
  • Acleris Fimbriana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

    Acleris Fimbriana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

    Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1-7, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20200303010318 Effect of Different Host Plants on Growth, Development and Reproduction of Yellow Tortrix Moth Acleris fimbriana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Yonghua Liu*, Xianhua Li, Xiongfei Yan and Gang Li Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration in Shanbei Mining Area, and Key Laboratory of Plant Pest Control in Yulin City, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, P. R. China Article Information ABSTRACT Received 19 December 2019 Revised 02 April 2020 The yellow tortrix, Acleris fimbriana Merick (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is a serious pest on fruit trees in Accepted 20 May 2020 North China. Under laboratory conditions (temperature 25 ± 1ºC, 80 ± 5% relative humidity, photoperiod Available online 29 June 2020 14L:10D), the effect of the 4 host plants Armeniaca vulgaris (apricot), Malus pumila (apple), Prunus salicina (plum), and Amygdalus persica (peach) on the growth, development, survival, reproduction, Authors’ Contribution and life table parameters of A. fimbriana were studied. Different host plants had significant effects on YL designed the study. YL, XY and GL performed experimental work. XL the growth, development, and reproduction of A. fimbriana. The overall developmental duration was the analyzed the data. longest on apple (60.71 d) and peach (60.78 d) and shortest on apricot (54.55 ± 3.56 d). The cumulative survival rate was highest on apricot (64.58%) and plum (60.44%) and lowest on peach (44.50%). The Key words average number of eggs produced was highest on apricot (175.58 eggs) and plum (178.43 eggs). Life Acleris fimbriana, Host plant, table parameter results showed that the net reproductive rate, intrinsic growth rate, and finite growth rate Developmental duration, Survival were highest on apricot (101.75, 0.0892, and 1.0933, respectively) and plum (97.75, 0.0832, and 1.0867, rate, Life table parameters respectively).
  • Serie B 1997 Vo!. 44 No. 1 Norwegian Journal of Entomology

    Serie B 1997 Vo!. 44 No. 1 Norwegian Journal of Entomology

    Serie B 1997 Vo!. 44 No. 1 Norwegian Journal of Entomology Publ ished by Foundation for Nature Research and Cultural Heritage Research Trondheim Fauna norvegica Ser. B Organ for Norsk Entomologisk Forening F Appears with one volume (two issues) annually. tigations of regional interest are also welcome. Appropriate Utkommer med to hefter pr. ar. topics include general and applied (e.g. conservation) ecolo­ I Editor in chief (Ansvarlig redaktor) gy, morphology, behaviour, zoogeography as well as methodological development. All papers in Fauna norvegica ~ Dr. John O. Solem, Norwegian University of Science and are reviewed by at least two referees. Technology (NTNU), The Museum, N-7004 Trondheim. ( Editorial committee (Redaksjonskomite) FAUNA NORVEGICA Ser. B publishes original new infor­ mation generally relevan,t to Norwegian entomology. The Ame C. Nilssen, Department of Zoology, Troms0 Museum, journal emphasizes papers which are mainly faunal or zoo­ N-9006 Troms0, Ame Fjellberg, Gonveien 38, N-3145 ( geographical in scope or content, including check lists, faunal Tj0me, and Knut Rognes, Hav0rnbrautene 7a, N-4040 Madla. lists, type catalogues, regional keys, and fundamental papers Abonnement 1997 having a conservation aspect. Submissions must not have Medlemmer av Norsk Entomologisk Forening (NEF) far been previously published or copyrighted and must not be tidsskriftet fritt tilsendt. Medlemmer av Norsk Ornitologisk published subsequently except in abstract form or by written Forening (NOF) mottar tidsskriftet ved a betale kr. 90. Andre consent of the Managing Editor. ma betale kr. 120. Disse innbetalingene sendes Stiftelsen for Subscription 1997 naturforskning og kulturminneforskning (NINAeNIKU), Members of the Norw. Ent. Soc. (NEF) will r~ceive the journal Tungasletta 2, N-7005 Trondheim.