Army Aviation Flight Information Digest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Army Aviation Flight Information Digest DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL BULLETIN TB SIG 1-482 ARMY AVIATION FLIGHT INFORMATION DIGEST \Aot\ce SAVE THIS ISSUE! ie,e\3-c° pad ash -- see DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 20 OCTOBER 1965 •AwArK-5.6ek - FOREWORD The Army Aviation Flight Information Digest is published weekly. Every fourth week a complete issue will be published followed by three weekly supplemental issues. The latest supplemental issue together with the last complete issue contains the latest known notices to Army aviators. It provides current and permanent flight information for Army, National Guard and Army Reserve aviation activities. Notices of permanent and temporary hazardous conditions concerning airfield and communication facilities, special notices, flight procedures and other related Army aeronautical items are included in this Digest. Airfield installation commanders are responsible for submitting changes in airfield conditions, facilities, services, air navigational aids and other matters affecting operations at such airfield installation by the most expeditious means, as per AR 95-14, to the agencies listed below: 1. Nearest Federal Aviation Agency Flight Service Station. 2. Colnma.nding Officer, U. S. Army Aviation Flight Information and NavAids Office, Washington, D. C. 20315 Stop: 48 (Telephone OXford 68741) Errors or necessary changes in flight information publications as well as inquiries and suggestions concerning this publication should be forwarded directly to Commanding Officer, U. S. Army Aviation Flight Information and NavAids Office, Washington, D. C. 20315 STOP 48 Information contained in this document is based upon the most reliable sources of operational data available to this office. Every effort is made to check the accuracy and adequacy of this data prior to its release for publication. The use of this publication, however, does not preclude the necessity for preflight review of the latest NOTAMS, related flight data and directives available in each airfield operations office. LEGEND Abbreviations used are those published in the USAF/USN Flight Information Publication PLANNING, General Information, Section I. General information legend data listed below will be those used exclusively for this publication. Information will be published in this Digest until reflected in the appropriate FLIP publications. Communications and NavAids data will be carried in the text until inserted in the Directory of Army airfields (published every 4th week). TNG (Training) - Indicates Army NavAid on non-commissioned status or a radar facility which is restricted to training purposes only. Operating hours subject to change. Use at discretion of aviator. (AFA) Army Flight Activity (ARNG) - Army National Guard New or revised data appearing FW Fixed Wing for the first time and for RW Rotary Wing ACIC pick up DIRECTORY OF ARMY AIRFIELDS Page 1 AIR FIELD FActLrriE s VOICE COMMUNICATIONS Weather Service INSTALLATION and AIRFIELD Hours of FAC Hours of Flight Service Statior FREQUENCIES Opns tel extension operation CALL operation Tie-In (FSS) GMT(Z)Time (Z ) ABERDEEN PROVING GND Cent Twr 229. 6, 241. 0, 126. .2 Cont Baltimore DPC, Wash Phillips AAF 122. 5G. (E) FSS, ARTCC, Inter - (Aberdeen, Md.. ) phone. Svc A aval. D/N-272-4000, x4902 LAPG) Gnd C 12.1. 9 - 5 hrs. A. P. HILL MIL RESER. A. P. Hill AAF Da/light FSS Blackstone. Cooke AAF Daylight (Bowling Green, Va. ) -3 hrs. A, P. HILL MIL RESER Mica AAF Daylight FSS Blackstone. Moss Neck-AAF Daylight (Bowling Green. Va, ) -5 hrs. ARIZONA ARMY NATL GD 1500 - 2330 FSS Phoenix, Inter- Papa go AAF (Prior req OT) phone. (Phoenix, Ariz.) -7 hrs. ATLANTA ARMY DEPOT Morris AAF 1245 - 2130 Twr 241.0, 126.2, (E), 1245-2130 FSS Atlanta, lriterphc ne. (Forest Park, Gat) Mon-Fri 27. 8FM Mon-Fri (FOP) -5 hrs. BLACK HILLS ARMY DEPOT FSS Chad run. Black Hills AAF NONE (Igloo, S. D. ) -7 hrs. BROOKE ARMY MED CTR BAMC 248. 2, 241. 0, 126, Z, FSS San Antonio, Leer Brooke Army Med Ctr AHP 1330 - 2230 Radio 143. 1, (E), 38. ZFM 1330-2230 Telephone. Svc A ava (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.) -6 hrs. Adv CAMP ASHLAND NG 38. 6FM 1400- 2230 FSS Lincoln, Long avc H. J. Paul AAF 1400 - 2230 Mon-Fri Distance Telephone. (Ashland, Neb) Mon-Fri Perfect Blend -6 hrs. CAMP DRUM FSS Watertown, Inter Wheeler -Sack AAF phone. (Watertown, N. Y.) (GTB) -5 hrs. CAMP GRAYLING NG Grayling AAF (Grayling. Mich. ) -5 hrs. CAMP MABRY NG Daylight Local phone to Mabry AAF daily NONE Austin FSS (Austin, Texas) (MMR) -6 hrs. - --- '7- 7" .,7177"6777.7.77.'. ,T,,,.77T 4•17r DIRECTORY OF ARMY AIRFIELDS Page 2 AIRFIELD FA CILiTIE s VOICE COMMUNICATIONS Weather Service INSTALLATION and AIRFIELD Hours of FAG Hours of Flight Service Station FREQUENCIES Oprts tel extension operation CALL operation Tie-In (FSS) GMT(2)Time (Z) CAMP McCOY NG FSS LaCrosse, Long McCoy AAF Distance Telephone. (Camp McCoy, Wisc. ) (CIWYL -6 hrs. CAMP PICKETT , BKT 255. 4, 272. 7, 126. 7, 1100-0300 FSS Blackstone on Blackstone AAF Cola Radio 135. 9, 122. 2T, 1 12. 9T, daily Field. Svc A aval. (Blackstone, Va. ) 122. 1G, (E) DIN - 7 124 (BKT) -5 hrs. CAMP RIPLEY NG FSS Alexandria, Intel Ripley AAF SEE NOTICE SECTION phone. (Jun-Aug) (Little Falls, Minn) (RPY) -6 hrs. CAMP ROBERTS FSS Salinas, Inter- Main Garrison Parade Gnd SEE NOTICE SECTION Roberts AAF phone to OAR. (San Miguel, Calif. ) (SYL) -8 hrs. CAMP ROBERTS East Garrison AD+ FSS, SNS Roberts AAF CLSD L FN (San Miguel, Calif.) (SYL) -8 hrs. CAMP ROBINSON NG 1330-2230 Opns 1330- 2230 Mon-Fri FSS Pine Bluff. Robinson AAF Mon-Fri 1400-2300 (Little Rock, Ark. ) 1400-2300 Sat Sat -6 hrs. CAMP SHELBY NG FSS McComb, Long Shelby AAF Distance Telephone. (Hattiesburg, Miss, ) (HTB) -6 hrs, CARLISLE BARRACKS Coot FSS Harrisburg. Carlisle Barracks AHP (Carlisle, Pa.) -5 hrs. DUGWAY PROVING GND 1445 2315 Twr 241.0, 248. 2, 126. 2, 1445-2315 FSS Salt Lake City, Michael AAF (1 hr prior req (E) (1 hr prior Interphone. AF Wea (Dugway, 'Utah) (DPG) OT) req OT) 7/et, Svc A aval. D-5107/5414,N-Call Operator -7 hrs, 1300-21 30 EDGEWOOD ARSENAL 1300 - 2130 Opns 241. 0 M on-Fri FSS Washington, Inte. Weide AAF Mon-Fri (Prior req phone. (Edgewoocl, Md: ) OT) (EDG) . -5 hrs. DIRECTORY OF ARMY AIRFIELDS Page 3 AIRFIELD VOICE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Weather Service INSTALLATION and AIRFIELD FAC Hours of FREQUENCIES Hours of Flight Service Station Opns tel extension operation CALL operation Tie-In (FSS) (GMT(ZITime (Z1 FORT BELVOIR Cont. Twr 229. 4, 241, 0, 126. 3, Gent FSS Washington, Inter Davison AAF (E) phone. AF Wea Det. (Fort Belvoir, Va. ) Gnd C 245, 2 Svc A av:>1. D/N-21201/21202 (DAA) 'Cln Del 245. 2 - 5 hrs. Twr 241, 0, FORT HENNING 236. 6, 126, 2, Cont Ill. FSS Atlanta, Interphon e. Lawson AAF 4T, (.E), 27, firtri Cont AF Wea Det. Svc A (Columbus, Ga. ) Gnd C 219. 4, 121. 7 aval. D/N-545-4322/3594 (LSF) ClnDel 248. 2, 142, 33 -6 hrs, FORT BENNING McKenna AAF AMP CLSD Dill•TVI5A- (MKF) FORT BRAGG Cont Twr 241, 0, 126, 2, (E), Cant FSS Rocky Mount, Into r- Simmons AAF 27. 8FM phone. AF Wea Det. (Fayetteville, N. C.) AnDel 241.0 Svc A aval. D/N-36218/72187 (FBG) -5 hrs. FORT CAMPBELL Twr 241,0,236.6.126.2,111.0T, (E) Cont Gnd C 475.8; Cln:29C19;apC:391.9 Coot FSS Bowling Green, Campbell AAF ,,, App C 255.6, 237. 5,363.8,270. 6, Interphone. AF Wea EN t. (Hopkinsville, Ky.r) 118.1,139.9, 134.1 Cont Svc A aval. D/N-4224 (HOP) 142,02, (E) -6 hrs. 1400-0200 400-040 FORT CARSON Twr 441. 0, 229. 4, 126. 2, .0 FSS Denver, lnterphon Mon-Sat Mon-Sat Butts AAF (E), 27. 8FM Svc A aval. (Colorado Spg's, Colo.) 1600-2400 1600-2400 D/N-2913/3152. (FCS) Sun & hol San & hol -7 hrs_ FORT DEVENS Cont. Twr 241. 0, 229, 4, 126. 2, 1130-2030 FSS Boston, Interphone Devens AAF (E), 27. 8FM Mon-Fri vc A aval. 175/1080 (Ayer, Mass. ) (1 hr ntc Wea from Westover AI (AYE) OT) -5 brat FORT EUSTIS Cont Twr 248. 2, 241, 1, 126. 3, Coot SS Newport News, IM er Felker AAF 111. 4T, (E), 27, EfFivi 'hone. AF Wea Det. 5, (Lee Hall, Va. ) GndCtl 229. 4 • aval. D/ N 878 -2584, D-878 -3598 (FAF) -5 hrs. 255, 4, FORT GREELY Cont Big 126.7, 122. 2T, Cont SS Big Delta. FSS Allen AAF Delta 122. 1G, 3023. 5G, (E) ea & US Army Met (Fort Greely, Alaska) Radio eam Wea. D-872-4113.N-873-1214(BIG) Opns 46. 4FM -9 hrs. 1200-0400 FORT HOOD Cont Twr 229. 6, 241.0, 126. 2, Mon-Fri 1 SS College Station, Hood AAF 122. 50, 118. 6, (E), 1200-2400 Interphone. AF Wea D et. (Killeen, Tex,) 38. 6FM, 27. 8FM Sat, Sun, Svc A aval. D/N-685-5203/34/6 (HER) Gnd C 225.4 Hol, -6 hrs. 1330 - 2230 1330-2230 FORT HOOD Mon-Fri Twr 265. 6, 241.0, 0, 126. 2, Mon-Fri • SS College Station, 1330 - 1730 (E), 32...11:M nterphone. Robert Gray AAF bat 1406 - 18uu (1 hr ntc OT) GlnDel 65. 6, 126. 2, 241.0 Sat D/N 532-3200/3209 (GRK) 1 hr ntc OT -6 bra • ••,^••" -" " DIRECTORY OF ARMY AIRFIELDS Page 4 AIRFIELD- - — - VOICE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIESFACILTIESI Weather Service and r. INSTALLATION Hours of Flight Service Station AIR FIELD Hours of FAC FREQUENCIES Opns tel extension operation CALL operation Tie-In (FSS) GMT(Z)Tirn (Z) 126.2, 1300-0300 FSS Douglas, Interphoi e.
Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Closing of Fort Devens
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1998 Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens. Janet B. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Sullivan, Janet B., "Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens." (1998). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5347. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5347 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented by JANET B. SULLIVAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION February 1998 School of Education ® Copyright 1998 by Janet B. Sullivan All Rights Reserved LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented BY JANET B. SULLIVAN Approved as to style and content: C. Carey, Member ft SM-C+' ^/Sheila Mammen, Member Dean ACfQPMLEDGMENTS "Be All That You Can Be" is the Army's recruiting motto. I have been employed by the US Army since 1974. First, I was an Army officer; and now I am a federal civilian employee working as The Equal Employment Opportunity Officer at Fort Carson, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • (WESTON) History of Working at DOD Facilities Within Pennsylvania
    Weston Solutions, Inc. (WESTON) Successful History of Working at DOD Facilities within Pennsylvania •WESTON is local PA firm with Corporate Office in West Chester, PA •Established in 1957, more than 500 employees in PA • Over 30 years of RI/FS experience under CERCLA •Letterkenny Army Depot (Chambersburg, PA) •Working at installation from 1989 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Various environmental projects from SI, RI, FS through removals. •Tobyhanna Army Depot (Tobyhanna, PA) •Working at installation from 1996 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Various environmental projects including munitions projects. •Tobyhanna Artillery Range Formerly Used Defense Site (Tobyhanna, PA) •Working at site from 2003 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Conducted RI/FS and numerous removal actions for munitions •Fort Indiantown Gap (Annville, PA) •Working at site from 2003 to present with PADEP, EPA and the Army •Conducted various environmental projects, site assessments, RI, and removals •Defense Distribution Supply Point (Harrisburg, PA) •Working at site from 1994 to present with PADEP, EPA, and the Army •Various environmental projects from SI, RI, FS through removals. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA) and Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) Flow Chart Preliminary Site Remedial Feasibility CERCLA Assessment Inspection Investigation Study Evaluate Alternatives Needing Characterize Site, GOALS Identify Releases &Identify Further Risk Assessment Investigation Preferred Remedy Note CERCLA activities after RI Current Stage of MMRP Work contingent upon risk evaluation Contracted to WESTON Proposed Public Decision Remedial Remedial Plan Comment Document Design Action Propose Design/Work Implement Public Authorize Selected Plan for Chosen Participation Selected Remedy Remedy Remedy Remedy MMRP Remedial Investigation Fieldwork Objective is to characterize nature and extent of munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) to determine if remediation is needed based on risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm16270894-1966.Pdf (2.516Mb)
    ),,1( 3 os-. ,,.., J A ,,11\..­ /9 ~ 6 " .. " , , .4 ••" • , " ,... " .) . ~ ~ ~ . ~ : :4 .. : ...... ".. .- : "' .: ......... : •• :.:: ;" -a : • .I~" ) I~ ••.••••.• : .••• ., • . •• :: ••• ! ... 3 s-s-. , 113 A ~3 /lJ 19 6 ~ ~ THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY DIVISION THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE 905 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston 02215 31 December 1966 SUBJECT: Annual Report, Military Division, Commonwealth of Massachusetts TO : His Excellency John A. Volpe Governor and Commander-in-Chief State House Bo ston, Mas sachusetts I. GENERAL 1. This annual report of the Military Division of the Commonwealth for the calendar year 1966, although not required by law, is prepared for the information of the Governor and Commander-in-Chief, as well as for other public officials and t he general public. II. DESCRIPTION 2. The Military Division of the Commonwealth , organized under Chapter 33 of the General laws, comprises the entire military establishment of Massachu­ setts. The Gover nor is Commander -in-Chief, in accordance with Article LIV of the Amendments t o the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The Adjutan.t General is Chief of Staff to the Commander-in-Chief and exe.cutiveand administrative head of the Military Division which consists of the following: a. The State Staff. b. The Aides -de-Camp of the Commander-in-Chief. c. The Army National Guard composed of the following organizations: Hq & Hq Det MassARNG 26th Infantry Division 102d Ar t illery Group 181st Engineer Battalion 241st Engineer Battalion 109 th Signal Battalion 164th Transportation Battalion 1st Battalion (Nike-Hercu1es) 241st Artillery 101s t Ordnance Company 215 th Army Band 65 th Medical Detachment 293d Medical Detachment 31 Dec 66 SUBJECT: Annual Report, Military Division, Commonwealth of Massachusetts d.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of Fort Monmouth, New Jersey and the U.S
    A CONCISE HISTORY OF FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY AND THE U.S. ARMY CECOM LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND Prepared by the Staff of the CECOM LCMC Historical Office U.S. Army CECOM Life Cycle Management Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Fall 2009 Design and Layout by CTSC Visual Information Services, Myer Center Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Visit our Website: www.monmouth.army.mil/historian/ When asked to explain a loyalty that time had not been able to dim, one of the Camp Vail veterans said shyly, "The place sort of gets into your blood, especially when you have seen it grow from nothing into all this. It keeps growing and growing, and you want to be part of its growing pains." Many of the local communities have become very attached to Fort Monmouth because of the friendship instilled...not for just a war period but for as long as...Fort Monmouth...will inhabit Monmouth County. - From “A Brief History of the Beginnings of the Fort Monmouth Radio Laboratories,” Rebecca Klang, 1942 FOREWORD The name “Monmouth” has been synonymous with the defense of freedom since our country’s inception. Scientists, engineers, program managers, and logisticians here have delivered technological breakthroughs and advancements to our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen for almost a century. These innovations have included the development of FM radio and radar, bouncing signals off the moon to prove the feasibility of extraterrestrial radio communication, the use of homing pigeons through the late-1950s, frequency hopping tactical radios, and today’s networking capabilities supporting our troops in Overseas Contingency Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • For Hotel Range Renovation at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, Massachusetts June 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for Hotel Range Renovation at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, Massachusetts June 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Hotel Range Renovation Environmental Assessment June 2020 Abstract Designation: Environmental Assessment Title of Proposed Action: Hotel Range Renovation Project Location: Fort Devens Lead Agency for the EA: Department of the Army Affected Region: Hotel Range, South Post, Fort Devens Action Proponent: U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens Point of Contact: Ms. Suzanne Richardson USAG Fort Devens 30 Quebec Street, Box 10 Devens, Massachusetts 01434-4479 [email protected] Date: June 2020 U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens has prepared this Environmental Assessment in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the Army regulations for implementing NEPA. The Proposed Action would reorient Hotel Range on the Fort Devens South Post by moving the firing lanes so that the range’s surface danger zone would be entirely within Army property. In addition, the range would be modernized to meet Army training standards, including adding vehicle firing positions and updating targetry at the range. Demolition of the existing range support structures would occur, and new structures would be built at the new firing line. No changes in the use of the range (i.e., frequency, duration, or caliber) are expected. This Environmental Assessment evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with two action alternatives and the No Action Alternative on a full range of resource areas, including a more detailed analysis of the following resources: air quality, human health and safety, biological resources, cultural resources, hazardous and toxic materials and waste, geology and soils, and water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Range Fort Devens - Lancaster, Massachusetts
    NOTICE OF INTENT AUTOMATED MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE SOUTH POST RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA - HOTEL RANGE FORT DEVENS - LANCASTER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: U.S. ARMY GARRISON FORT DEVENS 30 Quebec Street, Box 10 Devens, MA 01434-4479 c/o THE MASON & HANGER GROUP, INC. 300 West Vine Street, Suite 1300 Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1814 Prepared by: GeoInsight, Inc. One Monarch Drive, Ste 201 Littleton, MA 01460-1440 978-679-1600 [email protected] www.geoinsightinc.com September 2020 GeoInsight Project 9505-001 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Notice of Intent – WPA Form 3 Notice of Intent Narrative 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT SITE SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PROJECT PROPONENT ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROJECT Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 ANTICIPATED PROJECT ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic
    Chapter 6 THE EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic Era Following World War II, the US Army retained the organizational structures, with minor modifications, which had won that war. This organization—which did not include a maneuver unit called the brigade after the two brigades in the 1st Cavalry Division were eliminated in 1949—was also used to fight the Korean War in 1950-1953. Despite the success of the triangular infantry division in two wars, the Army radically changed the structure in 1958 by converting the infantry division to what became known as the Pentomic Division. Ostensively, the Pentomic structure was designed to allow infantry units to survive and fight on an atomic battlefield. Structurally it eliminated the regiment and battalion, replacing both with five self- contained “battlegroups,” each of which were larger than an old style battalion, but smaller than a regiment. A full colonel commanded the battlegroup and his captains commanded four, later five, subordinate rifle companies. The Pentomic Division structurally reflected that of the World War II European theater airborne divisions. This was no surprise since three European airborne commanders dominated the Army’s strategic thinking after the Korean War: Army Chief of Staff General Matthew Ridgway, Eighth Army commander General Maxwell Taylor, and VII Corps commander Lieutenant General James Gavin. Though theoretically triangular in design, the two airborne divisions Ridgway, Taylor, and Gavin commanded in the war, the 82d and 101st, fought as division task forces reinforced with additional parachute regiments and separate battalions. For most of the Northern European campaign, both divisions had two additional parachute regiments attached to them, giving them five subordinate regiments, each commanded by colonels.
    [Show full text]
  • FY2005 Annual Report
    AnnAnnualual ReportReport 20052005 MassachusettsMassachusetts DivisionDivision ofof FisheriesFisheries && WildlifeWildlife Annual Report 2005 Massachusetts Division of fisheries & WilDlife Wayne F. MacCallum Director Jack Buckley Rob Deblinger, Ph.D. Deputy Director Deputy Director Administration Field Operations Table of Contents The Board Reports.............................................................................................4 Fisheries.............................................................................................................8 Wildlife.............................................................................................................17 Landowner Incentive Program .......................................................................29 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program.........................................31 Information & Education................................................................................37 Hunter Education............................................................................................40 District Reports ...............................................................................................45 Wildlife Lands ..................................................................................................55 Federal Aid Program Administration..............................................................61 Maintenance and Development.......................................................................63 Legislative Report............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of An
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with EDGAR LENZ Mechanic, Army, World War II 2000 OH 428 OH 428 Lenz, Edgar (1921-2006). Oral History, 2000. Master: 1 videocassette (ca. 82 min.); sd., col.; 1/2 in. User: 1 audio cassette (ca. 82 min.); analog, 1 7/8 ips. Abstract: Oshkosh, Wisconsin native Edgar Lenz discusses his service as a mechanic with Service Company, 127 th Infantry, 32 nd Division (Red Arrow) in the Pacific Theater during World War II, his postwar military service, and his veteran experience. In response to the Great Depression and still in high school, Lenz joined the Wisconsin Army National Guard in Oshkosh in November 1938. Federalized in October 1940, he and his unit went to Camp Livingston in Pineville, Louisiana in February 1941. He briefly covers his time spent on maneuvers, his duties conveying homebound troops and labeling equipment crates, his departure for California via the East Coast, and the April 1942 embarkation of the 32nd from port in San Francisco bound for Australia. Lenz relates his experiences in Australia. A bout of dengue fever incapacitated Lenz and the 127 th shortly after arrival at 7 Mile Drome in Papua, New Guinea in September 1942. A bout of malaria befell him in Buna, and Lenz tells of the course of his affliction and treatment in New Guinea and Australia. Lenz alludes to participation in the landing (April 22, 1944) at Aitape on the northern coast of Papua, New Guinea. He was tasked with ensuring delivery of unloaded supplies up to the troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Devens Superfund Site
    Redevelopment and the Benefit to Community Fort Devens Superfund Site Introduction In 1917, Camp Devens was established as a temporary training camp for World War I soldiers on 11,000 acres of property located in the towns of Ayer, Lancaster, Harvard and Shirley. Upon its designation as a permanent post in 1931, the facility was renamed Fort Devens in honor of Civil War Union Army General and former U.S. Attorney General Charles Devens. Shortly thereafter, and continuing through the end of World War II, Fort Devens served as an Army induction center and training installation. Decades of military training and related operations resulted in soil, sediment and groundwater contamination. In 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added Fort Devens to the Agency’s National Priorities List (NPL) for investigation under the federal facility provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund. In 1991, Fort Devens was identified for closure under the Defense Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Act of 1990, which resulted in the accelerated investigation and cleanup (as warranted) of areas slated for transfer and redevelopment. Although investigatory and monitoring activities continue in several areas, cooperation among the Army, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the EPA, MassDevelopment, developers and the local communities has resulted in the successful cleanup, continued use and redevelopment of most of the former Army base. Today, land uses at the former Army base include commercial and industrial businesses, residential neighborhoods, natural areas, recreation facilities and Army reserve training facilities. Superfund site restoration and redevelopment activities, particularly at former military installations, have revitalized local economies by stimulating corporate growth, creating new employment opportunities for communities impacted by historical base closures, and augmenting current tax revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Inventory Management
    çÿY) nto-an FM 710-27 Vs\ I S' * 'do *4 FIELD MANUAL y ± LOGISTICS INVENTORY MANAGEMENT RETURN TO THEMMY LIBRARY ROOM 1A518 PENTAGON W ASHINGTON, D. C\20310 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARIMENT\OF THE ARMY ^ . ■ à 'GO FM 710-27 3LD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 71C WASHINGTON, DC, 1 January 1980 Paragraph Page PART ONE. lîKmODUCTION 1-1 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL 1-1, 1-2 1-1 CHAPTER 2. THE ROLE OF INVENTORY CONTROL. 2-1 Section I. General. 2-1-2-5 2-1 II. Complexity oï\Inventory Control. 2-6-2-S 2-3 III. Problems. 2-9-2-13 2-5 IV. Description of Inventory Control Functions. 2-14 2- 7 PART TWO. FUNCTIONS OF INVENTORY CONTROL. 3- 1 CHAPTER 3. CATALOGING. 3-1 Section I. The Significance of Catàloging. 3-1-3-4 3-1 II. Introduction of New Equrpment/Items. 3-5-3-S 3- 10 CHAPTER 4. MAJOR ITEM MANAGEMENT. 4- 1 Section I. General.. 4-1 4-1 Identification 4-2-4-S 4-1 Management at the National LeO^l 4-6-4-S 4-3 The Army Acquisition Objective (ASAO) and the Army Materiel Plan 4-9-4-13 4-5 Section Distribution Requirements and Distribution Planning 4-14—4 17 4-7 The Assets Position _A_ 4-18-4 20 4- 9 SECONDARY ITEM MANAGEMEN 5- 1 General. 5-1, 5-2 5-1 Management Methods for Secondary Items 5-3-5-S 5-1 Supply Management Techniques X- 5-9-5-14 5-7 Requirements Determination Y 5-15-5-18 5-14 Inventory Systems Costs X- 5-19-5-29 5-22 The Economic Order Quantity Concept Y 5-30-5-37 5-32 Probabilistic Inventory Models \ 5-38-5-42 .5-39 Demand Forecasting \ 5-43-5-47 5-43 Mobilization Requirements Y.
    [Show full text]