DOCSLIB.ORG

Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley, are linked by two unique characteristics, one of which is natural and the other built: the Nashua River and Devens (Figure 1.1-1). After decades of pollution, the Nashua River is returning to life, but much remains to be done. After seventy years of military activity and governance, Devens is now the towns' and one of the Commonwealth's greatest redevelopment opportunities. The Nashua River represents an incredible resource for the four towns, from an extensive ground water system, to wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities. Devens stands to be the economic force that will stimulate development in this region. The towns share the common interests of protecting and enhancing the Nashua River and its watershed, and mitigating the local impacts that will occur as Devens is successfully redeveloped. Absent a collaborative planning process, growth will neither be sustainable nor in keeping with the four towns' individual characters. To address this issue, the four towns applied together, through the Joint Boards of Selectmen (JBOS) to the Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA). The JBOS was awarded a grant under the Communities Connected by Water program. Through this initiative, the JBOS is partnered with the Nashua River Watershed Association (NRWA) and the Montachusetts Regional Planning Commission, to develop a growth management plan for this subregion of the Nashua River watershed. The Devens Commerce Center and the Devens Enterprise Commission are also providing substantive input to this program. 1.2 Statement of Problems The problems addressed through this program include: · Assuring a safe ground water supply for future generations. · Preserving water quality through safe and dependable wastewater treatment and septic disposal. · Assessing population growth and its demands for municipal services and limited natural resources. · Evaluating projected housing demand, the rate at which it's introduced to the market, the demands it will place on the towns' natural, municipal and fiscal resources, including the potential loss of open space. · Preventing traffic congestion and its negative impact on the communities character and quality of life. F:\DOCUME~1\Jody\LOCALS~1\Temp\~~PDTEMP\ALL.DOC 1-1 March, 2001 Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley Figure 1.1-1 Study Area F:\DOCUME~1\Jody\LOCALS~1\Temp\~~PDTEMP\ALL.DOC 1-2 March, 2001 Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley How these problems are addressed, and the questions to be answered, are detailed below. Water Assuring a safe water supply for future generations is absolutely critical to the health of these four towns. This region is served by a substantial high yield aquifer. Presently, Ayer, Lancaster and Shirley have public water supplies drawing from this resource, as does Devens. Harvard relies primarily on private wells, expect for a small system serving the town center. Despite several extensive studies, no know future public water supply has been identified for Harvard other than the aquifer beneath Devens. The aquifer needs to be more fully delineated and understood so that proper precautions can be taken to protect it from contamination. What is the capacity and location of the aquifer? What population (both numbers of people and numbers and types of businesses and industries) can it safely support? What are the recharge areas? Are they adequately protected from contamination? Wastewater and Septic Disposal Key to preservation of ground water resources is safe and dependable wastewater treatment and disposal. The Ayer wastewater facility needs upgrading. Lancaster is sewered, in part, through Clinton and is looking for expanded sewering for its Center. Harvard has no municipal sewer system, and is completely reliant on individual sewage disposal systems. Portions of Shirley, in particular Shirley Village will be connecting to the Devens wastewater treatment facility, as will Shirley MCI. Private septic systems need to dispose of sewage. Expanding sewer lines and districts is expensive. Alternatives need to be identified to safely serve town municipal centers, commercial districts, and clustered residential areas. How could/will a regional wastewater treatment facility alleviate wastewater treatment needs for Ayer and Shirley? What alternatives are available to provide for safe septic disposal in denser, unsewered areas in the towns? What will the effects be on sprawl should these alternatives be allowed or if/when sewer lines are extended into the towns? Population Growth With the change of Devens from a fenced military reservation to an open development area actively seeking new businesses, the dynamics of population growth has been dramatically altered. As Devens redevelops, it will accelerate and reinforce the present steady regional growth rate. Increased populations will bring increased pressures and demands for municipal services and on limited natural resources such as water. How our resources should be managed to support this population growth, without being damaged or depleted, is a challenge facing the four towns. F:\DOCUME~1\Jody\LOCALS~1\Temp\~~PDTEMP\ALL.DOC 1-3 March, 2001 Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley How are town centers and villages (i.e. Ayer's Main Street, Harvard's town center and Still River village, Lancaster's town center and North village, and Shirley's town center and village) enhanced to support traditional development patterns? Can village patterns be replicated in emerging commercial areas such as Route 110/111 in Harvard and Route 2A in Shirley? Housing and Open Space As the regional population grows, so does the demand for housing - and all types of housing. Increasingly woods and fields - open lands - are converted from rural landscapes to subdivisions. Because the Devens Reuse Plan lacks a substantial housing component, businesses locating on Devens will look first to the four towns for housing, adding to the existing development pressure. As with population growth, future residential growth will place sever demands on the towns' natural, municipal, and fiscal resources. On the other hand, there is concern about the rate at which the housing that does exist on Devens is introduced and the impact that will have on the local housing market. What are the tools (e.g. zoning, infrastructure improvements) available to the towns to assure sustainable housing development that provides for all segments of the population? What is the regional housing inventory? How do we encourage diversity of housing and subdivision patterns (e.g. cluster) that do not destroy the rural landscape of these towns? How can we link greenways and open space corridors within the region in keeping with the towns' open space plans and Nashua River Watershed Association's 2020 Vision Plan? Traffic The major east-west routes of 117, 2, Main Street in Ayer and Shirley, and 2A and north-south routes of I-495, 110/111, and 70 carry significant through-region, as well as local traffic. Seeking relief from congested major routes, more through traffic is detouring over local roads. At issue: keeping through traffic from becoming a negative impact on the region's resources or the communities' character and quality of life (e.g. clogged local roads and business districts), and encouraging alternative transportation (e.g. regional buses, commuter trains, bike trails). Which roads are most suited for regional through-traffic? What traffic patterns are emerging? What are the safe levels of flow? What and how are alternative modes of transportation encouraged? 1.3 Study Process As shown in Figure 1.3-1, the study was conducted in phases, coinciding with a series of public workshops. Phase 1 is the investigation of existing conditions; Phase 2 the analysis of trends; Phase 3 the development of planning and technological alternatives to manage growth; and Phase 4, F:\DOCUME~1\Jody\LOCALS~1\Temp\~~PDTEMP\ALL.DOC 1-4 March, 2001 Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley Figure 1.3-1 Study Process F:\DOCUME~1\Jody\LOCALS~1\Temp\~~PDTEMP\ALL.DOC 1-5 March, 2001 Communities Connected by Water: Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley recommendations and an action plan for implementing policies and programs to preserve quality of life in the region and foster and institute regional cooperative roles. For each of the phases, ENSR, the consultant-coordinator, conducted the technical analyses. These analyses were directed by a Steering Committee comprised of two representatives of each of the four towns (Ayer, Harvard, Lancaster and Shirley), the Nashua River Watershed Association (NRWA), the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC), the Devens Commerce Center (DCC), and the Devens Enterprise Commission (DEC). Also participating were the EOEA Nashua River Watershed Team Leader and a representative of the Massachusetts Audubon Society. Each of these representatives provided a network of involvement through other boards, agencies and public groups as the process proceeded. During preparation of the analyses, public input invited to frame the analyses, as well as to comment on the prepared analyses through a series of workshops. 1.4 Report Outline To address the issues described in Section 1.2, this report has been organized as follows: · Section 1 provides the statement of problems addressed by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Closing of Fort Devens
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1998 Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens. Janet B. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Sullivan, Janet B., "Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens." (1998). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5347. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5347 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented by JANET B. SULLIVAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION February 1998 School of Education ® Copyright 1998 by Janet B. Sullivan All Rights Reserved LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented BY JANET B. SULLIVAN Approved as to style and content: C. Carey, Member ft SM-C+' ^/Sheila Mammen, Member Dean ACfQPMLEDGMENTS "Be All That You Can Be" is the Army's recruiting motto. I have been employed by the US Army since 1974. First, I was an Army officer; and now I am a federal civilian employee working as The Equal Employment Opportunity Officer at Fort Carson, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm16270894-1966.Pdf (2.516Mb)
    ),,1( 3 os-. ,,.., J A ,,11\..­ /9 ~ 6 " .. " , , .4 ••" • , " ,... " .) . ~ ~ ~ . ~ : :4 .. : ...... ".. .- : "' .: ......... : •• :.:: ;" -a : • .I~" ) I~ ••.••••.• : .••• ., • . •• :: ••• ! ... 3 s-s-. , 113 A ~3 /lJ 19 6 ~ ~ THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY DIVISION THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE 905 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston 02215 31 December 1966 SUBJECT: Annual Report, Military Division, Commonwealth of Massachusetts TO : His Excellency John A. Volpe Governor and Commander-in-Chief State House Bo ston, Mas sachusetts I. GENERAL 1. This annual report of the Military Division of the Commonwealth for the calendar year 1966, although not required by law, is prepared for the information of the Governor and Commander-in-Chief, as well as for other public officials and t he general public. II. DESCRIPTION 2. The Military Division of the Commonwealth , organized under Chapter 33 of the General laws, comprises the entire military establishment of Massachu­ setts. The Gover nor is Commander -in-Chief, in accordance with Article LIV of the Amendments t o the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The Adjutan.t General is Chief of Staff to the Commander-in-Chief and exe.cutiveand administrative head of the Military Division which consists of the following: a. The State Staff. b. The Aides -de-Camp of the Commander-in-Chief. c. The Army National Guard composed of the following organizations: Hq & Hq Det MassARNG 26th Infantry Division 102d Ar t illery Group 181st Engineer Battalion 241st Engineer Battalion 109 th Signal Battalion 164th Transportation Battalion 1st Battalion (Nike-Hercu1es) 241st Artillery 101s t Ordnance Company 215 th Army Band 65 th Medical Detachment 293d Medical Detachment 31 Dec 66 SUBJECT: Annual Report, Military Division, Commonwealth of Massachusetts d.
    [Show full text]
  • For Hotel Range Renovation at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, Massachusetts June 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for Hotel Range Renovation at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, Massachusetts June 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Hotel Range Renovation Environmental Assessment June 2020 Abstract Designation: Environmental Assessment Title of Proposed Action: Hotel Range Renovation Project Location: Fort Devens Lead Agency for the EA: Department of the Army Affected Region: Hotel Range, South Post, Fort Devens Action Proponent: U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens Point of Contact: Ms. Suzanne Richardson USAG Fort Devens 30 Quebec Street, Box 10 Devens, Massachusetts 01434-4479 [email protected] Date: June 2020 U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens has prepared this Environmental Assessment in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and the Army regulations for implementing NEPA. The Proposed Action would reorient Hotel Range on the Fort Devens South Post by moving the firing lanes so that the range’s surface danger zone would be entirely within Army property. In addition, the range would be modernized to meet Army training standards, including adding vehicle firing positions and updating targetry at the range. Demolition of the existing range support structures would occur, and new structures would be built at the new firing line. No changes in the use of the range (i.e., frequency, duration, or caliber) are expected. This Environmental Assessment evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with two action alternatives and the No Action Alternative on a full range of resource areas, including a more detailed analysis of the following resources: air quality, human health and safety, biological resources, cultural resources, hazardous and toxic materials and waste, geology and soils, and water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Range Fort Devens - Lancaster, Massachusetts
    NOTICE OF INTENT AUTOMATED MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE SOUTH POST RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA - HOTEL RANGE FORT DEVENS - LANCASTER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for: U.S. ARMY GARRISON FORT DEVENS 30 Quebec Street, Box 10 Devens, MA 01434-4479 c/o THE MASON & HANGER GROUP, INC. 300 West Vine Street, Suite 1300 Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1814 Prepared by: GeoInsight, Inc. One Monarch Drive, Ste 201 Littleton, MA 01460-1440 978-679-1600 [email protected] www.geoinsightinc.com September 2020 GeoInsight Project 9505-001 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Notice of Intent – WPA Form 3 Notice of Intent Narrative 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT SITE SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PROJECT PROPONENT ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROJECT Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 ANTICIPATED PROJECT ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic
    Chapter 6 THE EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic Era Following World War II, the US Army retained the organizational structures, with minor modifications, which had won that war. This organization—which did not include a maneuver unit called the brigade after the two brigades in the 1st Cavalry Division were eliminated in 1949—was also used to fight the Korean War in 1950-1953. Despite the success of the triangular infantry division in two wars, the Army radically changed the structure in 1958 by converting the infantry division to what became known as the Pentomic Division. Ostensively, the Pentomic structure was designed to allow infantry units to survive and fight on an atomic battlefield. Structurally it eliminated the regiment and battalion, replacing both with five self- contained “battlegroups,” each of which were larger than an old style battalion, but smaller than a regiment. A full colonel commanded the battlegroup and his captains commanded four, later five, subordinate rifle companies. The Pentomic Division structurally reflected that of the World War II European theater airborne divisions. This was no surprise since three European airborne commanders dominated the Army’s strategic thinking after the Korean War: Army Chief of Staff General Matthew Ridgway, Eighth Army commander General Maxwell Taylor, and VII Corps commander Lieutenant General James Gavin. Though theoretically triangular in design, the two airborne divisions Ridgway, Taylor, and Gavin commanded in the war, the 82d and 101st, fought as division task forces reinforced with additional parachute regiments and separate battalions. For most of the Northern European campaign, both divisions had two additional parachute regiments attached to them, giving them five subordinate regiments, each commanded by colonels.
    [Show full text]
  • FY2005 Annual Report
    AnnAnnualual ReportReport 20052005 MassachusettsMassachusetts DivisionDivision ofof FisheriesFisheries && WildlifeWildlife Annual Report 2005 Massachusetts Division of fisheries & WilDlife Wayne F. MacCallum Director Jack Buckley Rob Deblinger, Ph.D. Deputy Director Deputy Director Administration Field Operations Table of Contents The Board Reports.............................................................................................4 Fisheries.............................................................................................................8 Wildlife.............................................................................................................17 Landowner Incentive Program .......................................................................29 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program.........................................31 Information & Education................................................................................37 Hunter Education............................................................................................40 District Reports ...............................................................................................45 Wildlife Lands ..................................................................................................55 Federal Aid Program Administration..............................................................61 Maintenance and Development.......................................................................63 Legislative Report............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of An
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with EDGAR LENZ Mechanic, Army, World War II 2000 OH 428 OH 428 Lenz, Edgar (1921-2006). Oral History, 2000. Master: 1 videocassette (ca. 82 min.); sd., col.; 1/2 in. User: 1 audio cassette (ca. 82 min.); analog, 1 7/8 ips. Abstract: Oshkosh, Wisconsin native Edgar Lenz discusses his service as a mechanic with Service Company, 127 th Infantry, 32 nd Division (Red Arrow) in the Pacific Theater during World War II, his postwar military service, and his veteran experience. In response to the Great Depression and still in high school, Lenz joined the Wisconsin Army National Guard in Oshkosh in November 1938. Federalized in October 1940, he and his unit went to Camp Livingston in Pineville, Louisiana in February 1941. He briefly covers his time spent on maneuvers, his duties conveying homebound troops and labeling equipment crates, his departure for California via the East Coast, and the April 1942 embarkation of the 32nd from port in San Francisco bound for Australia. Lenz relates his experiences in Australia. A bout of dengue fever incapacitated Lenz and the 127 th shortly after arrival at 7 Mile Drome in Papua, New Guinea in September 1942. A bout of malaria befell him in Buna, and Lenz tells of the course of his affliction and treatment in New Guinea and Australia. Lenz alludes to participation in the landing (April 22, 1944) at Aitape on the northern coast of Papua, New Guinea. He was tasked with ensuring delivery of unloaded supplies up to the troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Devens Superfund Site
    Redevelopment and the Benefit to Community Fort Devens Superfund Site Introduction In 1917, Camp Devens was established as a temporary training camp for World War I soldiers on 11,000 acres of property located in the towns of Ayer, Lancaster, Harvard and Shirley. Upon its designation as a permanent post in 1931, the facility was renamed Fort Devens in honor of Civil War Union Army General and former U.S. Attorney General Charles Devens. Shortly thereafter, and continuing through the end of World War II, Fort Devens served as an Army induction center and training installation. Decades of military training and related operations resulted in soil, sediment and groundwater contamination. In 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added Fort Devens to the Agency’s National Priorities List (NPL) for investigation under the federal facility provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund. In 1991, Fort Devens was identified for closure under the Defense Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Act of 1990, which resulted in the accelerated investigation and cleanup (as warranted) of areas slated for transfer and redevelopment. Although investigatory and monitoring activities continue in several areas, cooperation among the Army, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the EPA, MassDevelopment, developers and the local communities has resulted in the successful cleanup, continued use and redevelopment of most of the former Army base. Today, land uses at the former Army base include commercial and industrial businesses, residential neighborhoods, natural areas, recreation facilities and Army reserve training facilities. Superfund site restoration and redevelopment activities, particularly at former military installations, have revitalized local economies by stimulating corporate growth, creating new employment opportunities for communities impacted by historical base closures, and augmenting current tax revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Advisory Council to the Environmental Management Commission Building 3495 Camp Edwards, Massachusetts May 2, 2018 5:30 P.M
    Community Advisory Council to the Environmental Management Commission Building 3495 Camp Edwards, Massachusetts May 2, 2018 5:30 p.m. Meeting Minutes CAC Members: Organization: Telephone: E-Mail: Mimi McConnell CAC 508-428-9573 [email protected] Mark Harding Wampanoag Tribe 508-965-0452 [email protected] Andrew Campbell Town of Bourne 508-789-9752 [email protected] Ann Canedy CAC 508-362-4561 [email protected] Sharon Rooney Cape Cod Commission 508-362-3828 [email protected] CAPT Michael Hudson CG Base Cape Cod 508-968-6641 [email protected] EMC Staff: Organization: Telephone: E-Mail: Len Pinaud Acting EMC 508-946-2871 [email protected] Environmental Officer Attendees: Organization: Telephone: E-Mail: Ralph Vitacco Town of Sandwich 508-838-8001 [email protected] LTC Shawn Cody MA ARNG CE 508-968-5154 [email protected] LTC Matt Porter MA ARNG 508-789-8375 [email protected] BG Frank Magurn MA ARNG 339-202-3902 [email protected] SGT Christopher Delano JBCC/ARNG/TSC 781-281-4581 [email protected] SPC Thomas Depalo JBCC/ARNG/TSC 413-544-0724 [email protected] Paul Rendon JBCC Exec. Dir. Office 774-327-0643 [email protected] CPT Alex McDonough Range Control CE 774-286-1373 [email protected] Michael Ciaranca E&RC 508-968-5151 [email protected] Sally Hartmann E&RC 508-968-5145 [email protected] Emily Kelly E&RC 508-968-5146 [email protected] Jake McCumber MA ARNG CE 508-968-5848 [email protected] Sam Fields WCAI 781-534-2077 [email protected] Handouts Distributed at Meeting: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • CW4 Raymond A. Frank
    Chief Warrant Officer Four Raymond “Ray” A. Frank 11 May 1948 - 3 October 1993 Chief Warrant Officer Four Raymond “Ray” A. Frank, a pilot, artist and musician, was born on 11 May 1948 in Monrovia, California. CW4 Frank volunteered for service in the U.S. Army at the age of 17 when he enlisted in 1966. He served three tours in Vietnam as a ground combatant Soldier and a helicopter door gunner. After attending flight school in 1974, CW4 Frank served in a wide variety of assignments including Pilot, Instructor Pilot, Standardization Instructor, Maintenance Officer, and Operations Officer. Assignments following flight school included Fort Bragg, North Carolina; Fort Campbell, Kentucky; Camp Zama, Japan; and Fort Devens, Massachusetts, before ultimately returning to Fort Campbell to the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne) in 1990. CW4 Frank was always a teacher and innovator. He was one of the first pilots to become an instructor in air-to-air tactics and his contributions in the development of future Comanche ACM capabilities continue to shape both hardware and doctrine. During the initial integration of Black Hawks into the Army, specifically to the 2/17th CAV at Fort Campbell, Ray was the first instructor authorized to conduct aircraft transitions outside the confines of Fort Rucker. CW4 Frank’s military awards and decorations include, the Purple Heart, Air Medal w/Valor Device (w/Numeral 15), Meritorious Service Medal (w/3 OLC), Army Commendation Medal (w/1 OLC), Army Achievement Medal (w/1 OLC), Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal (w/ 1 Bronze Service Star), Vietnam Service Medal (w/Numeral 7), Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (w/Numeral 2), Vietnam Gallantry Cross, Master Aviator Badge and Aircrewmember Badge.
    [Show full text]