<<

the Future SMPTE’s Peter Ludé Discusses Frame Rates and Lasers by Andreas Fuchs

uring NAB 2012, the annual convention of the National “You could take a projector today that is already in the field,” he Association of Broadcasters in Las Vegas (www.nabshow. continues, “take out the Xenon lamp house and cold mirror and re- com), the Society of Motion Picture and Television place all that stuff with lasers and it could work just fine. Obviously, Engineers (www.SMPTE.org) will once again produce there are complexities in optical interface, control, cooling and many Da dedicated program on digital cinema. SMPTE “will other details, but in theory it can be done. On the other hand, a laser provide an in-depth global view of the new wave of technology com- projector designed from the ground up will enable the use of differ- ing soon to your local multiplex,” the organization noted in the pro- ent optics and overall system design, which would have advantages in gram announcement, “with an eye toward how it might later affect the brightness efficiency, contrast ratio, lower costs and smaller size. It will broader media ecosystem.” also facilitate a greener environment—with less power consumption, Founded in 1916 “to advance theory and development in the mo- fewer cooling vents and less carbon emission.” tion-imaging field,” it is not surprising that SMPTE takes a decidedly That “whole bunch of benefits” with laser illumination includes an grounded approach in describing the current state-of-engineering. expanded range of available colors as well, Ludé adds. “The wonderful “Cinema technology has historically been in the forefront of motion- thing about the DCI specs is that they can accommodate virtually any imaging invention. Over the years, revolutionary new technologies white points and color gamut. Now that we have lasers that allow us were first tested and proven in the movie theatre, only later to become to represent colors that are not possible for Xenon, those need to be mainstream in television broadcast or gaming.” established in order to support the overall workflow from capture to Until last year known as the Digital Cinema Summit, the April 14 exhibition. Sometimes, when everything is possible, it is more difficult and 15 series of events has been renamed the 2012 Technology Sum- to manage all the variations and to establish the foundation.” mit for Cinema (TSC), presenting “Advances in Image and Sound.” While lasers do not have to be different, Ludé makes a case for SMPTE president Peter Ludé feels the name change is emblematic of creative expression. “It is very easy to engineer a laser system to exactly the progress made over the past decade. In his view, the basics of digital- match the current P3 color gamut that you see today. It’s very readily cinema projection have been firmly established, so it is now time to look done. The interesting question that comes into this is whether we real- at additional improvements and benefits to be drawn from the technol- ly want to limit ourselves,” he muses. “Specifically in the deep reds and ogy, with help from the engineering and creative communities. cyan regions, with lasers audiences will be able to see something on the Film Journal International had the opportunity to speak exclusively screen that has not been possible before. Until someone from Pixar, for with the noted technologist in advance of the Summit about some of example, decides, ‘I would love to use that color because it would help the topics to be discussed and emerging trends to be analyzed there. my storytelling.’ Then the engineers will scratch their heads: ‘OK, how As our conversation readily confirms, with his day job as senior VP do we redefine that expanded gamut beyond P3?’ Technically, it is not of Sony Solutions Engineering overseeing all U.S.-based engineering so difficult,” he assures once again. “But in order to have a universally efforts for digital-cinema systems, software development and other accepted new standard color gamut, we have to get our heads together professional media solutions, Ludé is also very much in tune with the and decide what exactly we want to extend it to.” practical side of implementing innovations. Creatively, “it’s similar to 3D,” Ludé asserts, drawing another com- In line with our February issue’s report on the Moody Gardens parison. “You don’t need to use 3D, but now that it is available, you Digital Cinema Symposium, co-presented by Barco and D3D, Ludé could choose to use it if appropriate for your movie. Color gamut confirms upgraded sound environments, higher frame rates (HFR) is the same way. It is very simple to replicate what we have today, if and laser projection to be among the main topics. “Hey, all of this is that is what is desired. But now there is this new, tempting, unique exciting to us technologists,” Ludé enthuses. “I spend a lot of time enhancement allowing you to extend color range. Let’s work through talking to exhibitors and they have confirmed their interest in all of that and enable the filmmakers to do what they want to. As a matter these possibilities as well. From an audience participation impact, in of fact, they can still display a black-and-white movie just as well when my mind, it is a tie right now between HFR and laser.” there is a laser in the projector.” Beginning with the latter, “almost everybody that you talk to would Given the need for an industry-wide consensus, not to mention like to see brighter 3D images. Now that this will soon be possible that costs have to come down significantly, is Ludé not taking a rather with laser technologies, what should the new standards be?” Drawing optimistic view? “Maybe I’m biased,” he admits, “because another one the comparison to current DCI-defined 2D and de-facto 3D bright- of my night-and-weekend jobs is being the chairman of the Laser ness levels, he puts that range “probably somewhere in the middle” Illuminated Projection Association.” Realizing just how much work between 14 or 4.5 foot-lamberts coming off the screen. “needs to be done from a regulatory reform standpoint” too, LIPA

16 WWW.FILMJOURNAL.COM MARCH 2012 was set up earlier in the year (www.lipainfo.org). “We need to clarify second. Other people feel, practically speaking, 48 fps is virtually as the laws that apply to laser projection as opposed to standard lasers, good as 60 fps, although 60 fps might be ideal.” Ludé defers to noted because they are both very different. A laser-illuminated projec- filmmaker , the founder of Showscan, among many tor doesn’t really represent any more optical hazard than the Xenon other accomplishments, and the 2012 recipient of the Academy’s Gor- projectors that we have been using for over 50 years. And carbon arc don E. Sawyer Award “for his lifetime of technical contributions and lamps before that. Yet, they are subject to entirely different rules under leadership in the motion picture industry.” “He actually did very excit- the FDA and OSHA regulations,” Ludé has observed about the Food ing tests many years ago,” Ludé tells us. Using electroencephalograms and Drug Administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Impact and galvanometers, Trumbull measured “people’s perspiration, heart Assessment. “Those government agencies recognize that discrepancy. rates, EKG while they watch movies to gauge their emotional reac- However, they really don’t have a mechanism in order to create the tion… His results indicated that the human visual system and brain proper updates to their rules that would make laser-illuminated pro- respond incrementally as you raise the frame rate up somewhere in the jectors more practical in theatrical exhibition.” mid-60s. After that, raising the frame rate further only tends to make Moving on to another improvement on the horizon, just how prac- a tiny bit of difference. That’s why Trumbull came up with 60 as being tical will the implementation of higher frame rates turn out to be? a good target number. By happenstance, so did James when “When James Cameron and say that it looks better, you he made his announcement how he would like to do 2. At the have to pay attention to them,” Ludé states up front. “Technologists same time, for practical reasons, among others, Peter Jackson settled as well have been noting for years that the use of 48 or 60 frames per on 48 fps for The Hobbit.” second, especially for 3D, provides a very perceivable benefit, such as Along the same lines, Ludé acknowledges that many filmmakers in less eyestrain and more fluid 3D motion,” he says, naming but two Hollywood and elsewhere see 60 fps as too similar to television. “They improvements. “I think audiences will be excited about both of those. prefer to be at 24 frames to maintain the well-established aesthetic of Laser-illuminated projectors and HFR are very possible in the near cinema. So this is one of the techniques that a director should be able to future. Again, it is a matter of having the industry come together— continue to use to create a certain effect. From a technology standpoint, studios, exhibitors and manufacturers—and agreeing on what the new we can’t get ourselves in the middle of the crossfire in that discussion. target is. The engineering community is probably not the best one to I think there is a very valid artistic dimension to the discussion…it’s a answer that. Technically, all are quite feasible.” filmmaker’s choice. You should be able to do 24, or 16 frames for that Asked to elaborate, Ludé ventures, “You could make an argument matter, 60 or 120 frames per second. You pick what you want. Some from the scientific data that retinal retention has been proven to be folks, Trumbull notably, say why should the entire movie be at the same pretty strong up to around the 60 fps rate… But I have also talked to rate? Run those emotional dialogue scenes at 24, and when there is a car some people who say it needs to be much higher, like 120 frames per crash, do that at 120 fps. So the question to the technical community is: Savor the Sweet Success All the Way to the Bank Now, you can discover money-making ideas, special recipes, and try the machines for yourself. Join us for Gold Medal’s National Caramel Corn Day on April 26, 2012. Morning and afternoon sessions are available. Registration and participation is free, but space is limited. Register today and start making more money. National Caramel Corn Day! April 26, 2012 | Register at: www.gmpopcorn.com/nccd

10700 Medallion Drive | Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 1-800-543-0862 | www.gmpopcorn.com/nccd

18 WWW.FILMJOURNAL.COM MARCH 2012 Could we have variable frame rates within the same movie?” To tackle all this and more, a new SMPTE study group was estab- lished under its 21 DC (Digital Cinema) Committee. “Over 60 peo- ple are participating in this discussion of how good is good enough,” Ludé says. “How do we decide what is practical? And reflect what is already installed and what we might need to upgrade? How do we as- sure backward compatibility? Even if a film comes out at 48 or 60 fps, some theatres still want to run it at 24 fps because they haven’t been updated yet. How do you accommodate that?” While a variety of frame-rate conversions are already standard on television, this is “not something that you would commonly go to see in a movie theatre,” he notes. “Perhaps frame-rate conversion can be accommodated in the post-production pipeline. But we really have to be sure that it works before we move any further. In doing those conversions, you have to be very careful not to introduce anything contrary to what the original creative intent was.” Another one of the key messages in advance of the Technology Summit is that cinema is the original place for technological inno- vations. Ludé provides examples: “The introduction of sound, then multi-channel sound. Widescreen images going back to anamorphic, the use of special effects, fast cutting, computer graphics, stereoscopic 3D—all these innovations were originally implemented in theatres. A more recent example is 4K imaging, which incorporates four times the Picky patrons prefer popcorn resolution of high-definition television. 4K was pioneered by Sony in popped and topped with digital cinema, and has now become the premier standard for the best products from Odell’s. exhibitors. But at this year’s CES show, it is clear that 4K is heading Call us at (800) 635-0436, for the home theatre as well.” or visit us online at www.popntop.com Ludé thinks this “will continue to apply, [although] cinemas will not be the only mechanism of getting new things into the home.” The strength of movie theatres lies in the simple fact that “it’s not that hard to control the entire chain. Say Peter Jackson decides to shoot his movie at 48 fps—a whole new standard in 3D—and he could work out with his distributor to get some 4,000 screens to exhibit it in that way. Boom, it’s out there. You try to do that with television and you’ll find huge ob- stacles. Getting a new standard into 100 million homes in the U.S., and billions worldwide, is a very big challenge to go through with all the different set-top boxes, cable systems, satellite delivery, home record- ers, Blu-ray/DVD players. This is a much more complex infrastructure that is much slower to change.” He brings up Disney’s decision “to go 3D with Chicken Little back in 2005. They made that happen in some 80 theatres in just about six months. It takes five years to get that same level of functionality into people’s living rooms.” What does Ludé personally think about the movie theatre? “My own view, and that of many of my peers, is that the cinema is the gold standard in terms of imaging technology. It is, in fact, the highest stan- dard. Cinema is used for the most important stories told by the biggest- budget producers. So when a studio wants to produce a good movie and they are spending $40 or $50 million in production cost, they are going to be very persnickety about the creative as well as technical aspects. They are going to spend a lot more time on the lighting, on the lens se- lection, on exactly what film stock or digital image to capture on, every detail of color correction and so on. A lot more effort and thought, and creative intent and brilliant engineering, go into the creation of those movies. You contrast that with a typical television program, a reality show or the nightly newscast—just for practical reasons, you don’t have the budget. It’s good but just not that extravagant.” Although “we didn’t even talk about sound systems—and you will see a lot of new thinking on the acoustical front—it is a very excit- ing age for cinema now,” Ludé concludes. “I think the whole movie experience is going to continue to evolve. We currently have Digital Cinema 1.0 up and running. Now we are working on version 2.0, which will offer additional enhancements to maintain the cinema as the highest-quality viewer experience.” 

20 WWW.FILMJOURNAL.COM MARCH 2012