Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, Near Barkly West, Northern Cape

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM DESTINATION, NEAR BARKLY WEST, NORTHERN CAPE

DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

DENC Reference: NC/BA/21/FB/DIK/GON1/2016

Prepared for: On behalf of:

Tshani Consulting Frances Baard District Municipality

Prepared by:

EOH Coastal & Environmental Services

EAST LONDON 25 Tecoma Street East London, 5201 043 726 7809 Also in Grahamstown, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Maputo

www.cesnet.co.za | www.eoh.co.za

August 2016

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Project applicant: Frances Baard District Municipality Business reg. no. /ID. no.: Contact person: Mamikie Bogatsu Postal address: Private Bag X6088, Kimberly, 8300 Telephone: 053 838 0911 Cell: E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 053 861 1538

Prepared by:

Environmental Assessment EOH Coastal and Environmental Services Practitioner/Firm: Business reg. no. /ID. no.: 2012/151672/07 Contact person: Nande Suka Postal address: P.O Box 8145, Nahoon, 5210

Telephone: (043) 726 7809 Cell: E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (043) 726 8352

(For official use only) File Reference Number: Application Number: Date Received:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended.

Kindly note that:

1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. This report format is current as of 08 December 2014. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ascertain whether subsequent versions of the form have been published or produced by the competent authority 3. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 4. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report. 5. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations. 7. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority. 8. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 9. The signature of the EAP on the report must be an original signature. 10. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner. 11. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process. 12. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed. 13. Should a specialist report or report on a specialised process be submitted at any stage for any part of this application, the terms of reference for such report must also be submitted.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for the specialist appointed and attach in Appendix I.

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION a) Describe the project associated with the listed activities applied for

The Frances Baard District Municipality (FBDM) proposes the development of the Gong-Gong Eco- Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, on the banks of the Vaal River near Barkley West, in the Dikgatlong Local Municipality of the Northern Cape Province (Figure1.1).

Figure 1: District locality plan from a regional perspective.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 2: Development area in relation to Local Municipalities of the Northern Cape province.

Figure 3: The Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Village development perimeter.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

The area has a rich cultural and historical heritage coupled with the areas natural beauty and features such as the Vaal River, dancers cave and Gong-Gong falls. The proposed development is located on farms RE/281 (PNIEL), RE/371, Farm 372 (BAD HOPE), Farm 283 (GONG-GONG), Farm 284 and 1/284 and Farm 282.

The project is divided into three phases of development (See Appendix C for site layout):

Phase 1 activities:  Swing Bridge  Boardwalk along the river front  Multi-purpose Facility  Amphitheatre  Erection of information boards  Braai areas  Cart rides  Heritage sites  Water activities

Figure 4: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase one developments.

Phase 2 activities:  60 bed lodge  Conference facility

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

 Restaurant  Additional accommodation units (compact package infrastructure)  Extend the protected area

Figure 5: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase two developments.

Phase 3 activities:  Trail development (represented by the blue dotted line on map 6)  Adventure/teambuilding facility  Backpackers facility

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 6: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase three developments.

b) Provide a detailed description of the listed activities associated with the project as applied for

Listed activity as described in GN 734, 735 and Description of project activity 736 GN R 983 12(iii): The development of bridges A swing bridge of 300m2 spanning across the exceeding 100m2 within 32meters of a Vaal River is proposed. watercourse. GN R 983 12(x): The development of buildings A number of structures are proposed for the first exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a phase of development, including a multi-purpose watercourse. centre of 200m². GN R 983 12(xi): The development of structures Braai areas and other structures are proposed. exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a watercourse. GN R 983 12(xii): The development of A boardwalk of 920m² along the river is proposed. boardwalks exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a watercourse. GN R 983 19(i): The infilling or depositing of any Construction of the proposed swing bridge and

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT material of more than 5m³ into a watercourse. boardwalk may cause removal or deposition of material within the watercourse area. GN R 983 27: The clearance of 1 ha or more of The total combined clearance of indigenous indigenous vegetation. vegetation could exceed 1 hectare. GN R 983 67(i): Regarding phased The development will take place in a phased developments. manner.

2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES

“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—

(a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity.

Describe alternatives that are considered in this application as required by Appendix 1 (3) (h), Regulation 2014.Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity (NOT PROJECT) could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed.

The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes, etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the, competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. a) Site alternatives

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS) The area proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco- 28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is rich in natural beauty and heritage features, boasting the Gong-Gong waterfalls, dancers cave and San rock paintings to name a few. The site is located on land previously degraded by historical alluvial mining activities in the area, and later use for farming of

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT grazing animals. The development of the proposed site thus provides the perfect platform from which visitors can enjoy the many attractions of the area, while posing little threat to intact natural areas. The completion of the development will also help to conserve these intact natural areas from possible future degradation by informal mining activities. No other suitable site has been identified, therefore, no site alternatives have been assessed. Alternative 2 Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

Alternative 3 Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

In the case of linear activities:

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred)  Starting point of the activity  Middle/Additional point of the activity  End point of the activity Alternative S2 (if any)  Starting point of the activity  Middle/Additional point of the activity  End point of the activity Alternative S3 (if any)  Starting point of the activity  Middle/Additional point of the activity  End point of the activity

For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.

In the case of an area being under application, please provide the co-ordinates of the corners of the site as indicated on the lay-out map provided in Appendix A of this form. b) Lay-out alternatives

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS) The proposed layout of the facility will occur in areas already 28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E degraded through historic alluvial mining activities and use as grazing land. No other layout alternatives have been proposed, as the current layout has been informed by environmental factors and constraints. Alternative 2 Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Alternative 3 Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

c) Sanitation technology alternatives

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) – Biodigester Biogas Bio-digester: This is the preferred sewage treatment facility. The domestic digester is designed as waste to energy solution that turns organic waste (toilet effluent, kitchen waste etc.) into methane gas. Methane gas can be used to cook, heat water in a gas geyser etc. The facility can be operated with gravity and it is a simple system to operate and maintain, with very low skills required. Alternative 2 – Reed Beds This is a proven, environmentally friendly sewage treatment method which uses only natural sustainable ecological processes. Gravity driven systems do not require any energy input and maintenance requirements are low. They are highly effective when properly designed and can be used in combination with ponds and wetlands to produce near river quality water. Vertical flow reed-beds are more effective at nitrifying effluents, converting ammonia into nitrates and nitrites, than most package sewage treatment plants. Operational and maintenance costs are low. Alternative 3

d) Other alternatives (e.g. scheduling, demand, input, scale and design alternatives)

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)

Alternative 2

Alternative 3

e) No-go alternative

The No-Go alternative assessed the possible impacts which will result if the development does not take place.

Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

3. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY a) Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative activities/technologies (footprints):

Alternative: Size of the activity: Alternative A11 (preferred activity alternative) 980 000 m2 Alternative A2 (if any) m2 Alternative A3 (if any) m2 or, for linear activities:

Alternative: Length of the activity: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m Alternative A2 (if any) m Alternative A3 (if any) m b) Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur):

Alternative: Size of the site/servitude: Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 18 000 000 m2 Alternative A2 (if any) m2 Alternative A3 (if any) m2

1 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

4. SITE ACCESS

Does ready access to the site exist? YES NO If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m

Describe the type of access road planned:

Currently there are two existing gravel roads accessing the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco- cultural and Historical Tourism Destination.

Access Road 1: A surfaced and well maintained 5.4km long double lane gravel road accessing the proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village. The road is sign posted from the turnoff on the R31. Access Road 2: A poorly maintained 7.65km long gravel road accessing the site from the R31.

Figure 7: Map illistrating the positions of the two existing gravel access roads from the R31 to the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.

Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the road in relation to the site.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

5. LOCALITY MAP

An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A. The scale of the locality map must be relevant to the size of the development (at least 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g. 1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map.). The map must indicate the following:

 an accurate indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the alternative sites, if any;  indication of all the alternatives identified;  closest town(s;)  road access from all major roads in the area;  road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide access to the site(s);  all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and  a north arrow;  a legend; and  locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection).

6. LAYOUT/ROUTE PLAN

A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document.

The site or route plans must indicate the following:

 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;  the current land use as well as the land use zoning of the site;  the current land use as well as the land use zoning each of the properties adjoining the site or sites;  the exact position of each listed activity applied for (including alternatives);  servitude(s) indicating the purpose of the servitude;  a legend; and  a north arrow.

7. SENSITIVITY MAP

The layout/route plan as indicated above must be overlain with a sensitivity map that indicates all the sensitive areas associated with the site, including, but not limited to:

 watercourses;  the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWS);  ridges;  cultural and historical features;  areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or infested with alien species); and  critical biodiversity areas.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

The sensitivity map must also cover areas within 100m of the site and must be attached in Appendix A.

8. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this report. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable.

9. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION

A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of at least 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity.

10. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION

Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):

1. Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing YES NO Please explain land use rights? Currently the area proposed for the resorts development is used as grazing land, with small scale illegal mining occurring along the Vaal River. As such, the development of the Gong-Gong Eco- cultural village agrees with the current land used of the site, and may even have a positive impact as it will protect the area from further degradation. 2. Will the activity be in line with the following? (a) Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES NO Please explain The development of this site into an Eco-cultural and Historical tourism facility is in line with the Northern Cape SDF. The SDF calls for the promotion of tourism along the Treasure Route and the development of tourism related facilities along the Barkly West-ULCO development corridor. (b) Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES NO Please explain The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village is situated outside of any built environment and in no way restricts the future growth of urban areas in the vicinity. (c) Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and Spatial Development Framework (SDF) of the Local Municipality (e.g. would the approval of this application compromise YES NO Please explain the integrity of the existing approved and credible municipal IDP and SDF?). The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is in line with the aims of both the IDP and the SDF of the Dikgatlong Local Municipality, as it has been proposed by the Frances Baard District Municipality (the client) which is bound by the same framework.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(d) Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES NO Please explain As per the SDF of Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Gong-Gong is positioned along a primary corridor which is the R31 and runs parallel to the identified activity spine. The notable feature in close proximity to Gong-Gong is that of licensed Diamond Mining.

Although the proposed Eco Hub and Day Visitor development for Gong-Gong holds a strategic position, no specific accommodation or mention thereof has been referred to in the guiding policy frameworks. (e) An Environmental Management Framework (EMF) adopted by the Department (e.g. Would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing YES NO Please explain environmental management priorities for the area and if so, can it be justified in terms of sustainability considerations?) We are not aware of any other existing Environmental Management Plans adopted by the Department for the area. However, this development application will not compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities. It is believed that the development will promote the environmental integrity of the area. (f) Any other Plans (e.g. Guide Plan) YES NO Please explain There are currently no other plans pertaining to the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development. 3. Is the land use (associated with the activity being applied for) considered within the timeframe intended by the existing approved SDF agreed to by the relevant environmental YES NO Please explain authority (i.e. is the proposed development in line with the projects and programmes identified as priorities within the credible IDP)? The proposed development is not identified as a priority project in both the SDF and IDP. 4. Does the community/area need the activity and the associated land use concerned (is it a societal priority)? (This refers to the strategic as well as local level (e.g. development is a YES NO Please explain national priority, but within a specific local context it could be inappropriate.) The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination will benefit the Frances Baard District as a whole, as well as the local community. With the realignment of the Treasure Route to include Gong-Gong, the Frances Baard District may benefit from the increase in the number of tourists visiting the area. The local community will also benefit as developers aim to employ local people for the construction and operation of the resort. 5. Are the necessary services with adequate capacity currently available (at the time of application), or must additional capacity be created to cater for the development? YES NO Please explain (Confirmation by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.) Currently the site is not serviced by the municipal water or electricity supply systems.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

6. Is this development provided for in the infrastructure planning of the municipality, and if not what will the implication be on the infrastructure planning of the municipality (priority and placement of services and YES NO Please explain opportunity costs)? (Comment by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.) Water and sanitation services to the Gong-Gong area are highlighted in the Frances Baard DM SDF. However, there are no dedicated services to the proposed development area.

7. Is this project part of a national programme to address an YES NO Please explain issue of national concern or importance? The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination does not form part of any national programme. 8. Do location factors favour this land use (associated with the activity applied for) at this place? (This relates to the YES NO Please explain contextualisation of the proposed land use on this site within its broader context.) The current location proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is centrally situated between a number of natural, cultural and historical heritage features making it the perfect platform from which tourists can access these sites.

9. Is the development the best practicable environmental option YES NO Please explain for this land/site? The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination has been degraded by historical mining activities and use as grazing land. The Gong- Gong development is the best practicable environmental option for the area, as it will protect the site from further degradation while preserving all heritage sites.

10. Will the benefits of the proposed land use/development YES NO Please explain outweigh the negative impacts of it? The potential socio-economic benefits associated with the project outweigh any negative impacts, as the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development has been previously degraded by historical mining activities, decreasing the potential significance of impacts on natural areas.The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village has the potential to improve the current state of the environment.

11. Will the proposed land use/development set a precedent for YES NO Please explain similar activities in the area (local municipality)? The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village is not intended to set a precedent for similar activities in the area, although the success of the project will stimulate the local economy and increase tourism in the area, which may promote the development of similar projects indirectly.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

12. Will any person’s rights be negatively affected by the YES NO Please explain proposed activity/ies? The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development will not negatively affect any person’s rights.

13. Will the proposed activity/ies compromise the “urban edge” YES NO Please explain as defined by the local municipality? The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism facility is found outside the boundaries of the urban edge, and the nature of the activity will not compromise the urban edge.

14. Will the proposed activity/ies contribute to any of the 17 YES NO Please explain Strategic Integrated Projects (SIPS)? The proposed development does not directly contribute to any of the 17 listed SIPS.

15. What will the benefits be to society in general and to the local Please explain communities? The development will stimulate the local economy both directly and indirectly by attracting visitors and tourists. It will provide a platform from which people can access the natural, cultural and historical features of the area. The development will also benefit local communities directly by providing much needed jobs and skills development.

16. Any other need and desirability considerations related to the proposed Please explain activity? The Northern Cape desperately needs the development of tourist attracting developments to stimulate the economy and create employment opportunities for local peoples. 17. How does the project fit into the National Development Plan for 2030? Please explain The project fits into the NDP as it has the potential to raise employment opportunities in the area as well as kick-starting economic growth. The project will employ local peoples and provide them with skills development. 18. Please describe how the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management as set out in section 23 of NEMA have been taken into account. The following provides an analysis of how the objectives of integrated environmental management (IEM) have been considered in the current Gong-Gong Eco-cultural Development. The general objective of IEM is to: (a) promote the integration of the principles of environmental management set out in section 2 Alignment with NEMA principles described below into the making of all decisions which may have a (see Section 19 assessment below). significant effect on the environment;

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(b) identify, predict and evaluate the actual and potential impacts on the environment, socio- economic conditions and cultural heritage, the risks and consequences and alternatives and Implicit in the current EIA process. options for mitigation of activities, with a view to minimizing negative impacts, maximizing benefits and promoting compliance with the principles of environmental management set out in section 2; (c) ensure that the effects of activities on the environment receive adequate consideration Implicit in the current EIA process. before actions are taken in connection with them; The current EIA process has included a comprehensive PP process, including:  Publicised the project through visible signage, local press adverts, and identification of local (d) ensure adequate and appropriate opportunity stakeholders through engagement with for public participation in decisions that may Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Ward affect the environment; Councillors and other government officials and parastatals. Engagement with public during public consultation and telephonic, postal and email correspondence. (e) ensure the consideration of environmental A comprehensive assessment of the significance attributes in management and decision-making of impacts has been conducted as part of the which may have a significant effect on the BAR. environment; and (f) identify and employ the modes of A comprehensive feasibility study, including environmental management best suited to consideration of environmental issues, was ensuring that a particular activity is pursued in conducted prior to selecting alternatives for accordance with the principles of environmental inclusion in this EIA assessment. management set out in section 23. 19. Please describe how the principles of environmental management as set out in section 2 of NEMA have been taken into account. 2. (1) The principles set out in this section apply throughout the Republic to the actions of all organs of state that may significantly affect the environment and;

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(a) shall apply alongside all The onus is on the proponent Complies other appropriate and relevant to demonstrate to the considerations, including the authorising agency (DENC) The EIA process has been State’s responsibility to respect, that the State will not be undertaken in order to provide protect, promote and fulfil the abrogating its responsibility by social and economic rights in authorising the proposed the relevant decision-makers Chapter 2 of the Constitution development with the required information. and in particular the basic needs of categories of persons The required EIA should disadvantaged by unfair provide sufficient information discrimination; for the relevant authority to make a defendable and informed decision. (b) serve as the general The onus is on the proponent Complies framework within which to demonstrate to DENC that environmental management the NEMA principles will not It is the opinion of this review and implementation plans must compromised. that the proposed development be formulated; does not conflict with NEMA principles in such a manner that it places undue risks on the natural or socio-economic environment.

Mitigation measures that have been identified for possible impacts must be effectively implemented. (c) serve as guidelines by The onus is on the proponent Complies reference to which any organ of to demonstrate to the state must exercise any authorising agency (DENC) The EIA process has been function when taking any that in providing environmental undertaken in order to provide decision in terms of this Act or authorisation the principles of any statutory provision NEMA are duly addressed. the relevant decision-makers concerning the protection of the with the required information. environment; The required EIA should provide sufficient information for the relevant authority to make a defendable and informed decision. (d) serve as principles by Not Applicable Not Applicable reference to which a conciliator appointed under this Act must make recommendations; and

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(e) guide the interpretation, Not Applicable Not Applicable administration and implementation of this Act, and any other law concerned with the protection or management of the environment. (2) Environmental management The EIA process must Complies must place people and their demonstrate that the needs of The proposed development will needs at the forefront of its local people will be adequately concern, and serve their addressed and that the not result in any undue or physical, psychological, development will serve the unacceptable impacts on the developmental, cultural and interests of the public equitably. local socio-economic social interests equitably environment. Nor will any impacts be unfairly distributed. Recommendations made in the BAR must be adopted. (3) Development must be The EIA process must Complies socially, environmentally and demonstrate that the There is currently no indication economically sustainable. development is socially, environmentally and that the proposed project would economically sustainable. result in undue or environmental, social and economic impacts that would place the sustainability of local natural systems or the project at risk. Recommendations made in the BAR must be adopted.

(4) (a) Sustainable The development should not Complies development requires the result in a significant loss of Disturbance of local consideration of all relevant biodiversity. Should any loss factors including the following: occur then the development ecosystems must be avoided or impacts must be mitigated. should seek to minimise or (i) that the disturbance of remedy the impact or provide A rehabilitation plan will assist ecosystems and loss of suitable off-sets. in reducing the impact and biological diversity are avoided, providing benefits in terms of or, where they cannot be the re-establishment of natural altogether avoided, are vegetation. minimised and The recommendations made in remedied; the Environmental Management Programme must be adopted.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(ii) that pollution and Certain activities associated Complies with the project carry risks in degradation of the environment The BAR notes that impacts terms of pollution and are avoided, or, where they with regard to pollution and environmental degradation. cannot be altogether avoided, degradation of the environment This includes: Storm water run- are minimised and remedied; can be managed and will not off. result in an unacceptable impact on the local environment. The recommendations made in the BAR must be adopted. Particular focus must be given to the Environmental Management Programme with regard to:  Monitoring of stormwater;  Alien Vegetation Management; and  Erosion Management. (iii) that the disturbance of The proponent would need to Complies demonstrate that it would not landscapes and sites that A Heritage Impact Assessment impact on sites of valuable constitute the nation’s cultural must be conducted, and cultural and historical heritage. heritage is avoided, or where it recommendations of the cannot be altogether avoided, Heritage Specialist must be is minimised and remedied; adopted.

(iv) that waste is avoided, or Certain activities associated Complies with the project carry risks in where it cannot be altogether The BAR notes that impacts terms of pollution and avoided, minimised and re- with regard to pollution and environmental degradation. used or recycled where degradation of the environment possible and otherwise can be managed and will not disposed of in a responsible result in unacceptable impact manner; on the local environment. The recommendations made in the BAR must be adopted. Particular focus must be given to the Environmental Management Programme.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(v) that the use and exploitation Not Applicable - the project Not Applicable of non-renewable natural does not involve the exploitation resources is responsible and of non-renewable resources. equitable, and takes into account the consequences of the depletion of the resource; (vi) that the development, use The project should not involve Complies the unsustainable use of and exploitation of renewable The proponent does not intend renewable resources and resources and the ecosystems to and neither will they support ecosystems, nor should any of which they are part do not the over-use of groundwater as related secondary impacts exceed the level beyond which a renewable resource. their integrity is jeopardised. result in increased resource use. Mitigation measures must be effectively implemented, especially on-going monitoring.

11. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES

List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:

Title of legislation, policy or Applicability to the project Administering Date guideline authority National Environmental The proposed activities relating DEA, DENC 1998 Management Act (NEMA) to the development trigger a (No. 107 of 1998) BAR in terms on NEMA listed activities. National Environment The proposed development will DEA, DENC 2004 Management: Biodiversity Act require the clearing of (No.10 of 2004) vegetation as well as construction related activities which may potentially pose a threat to the environment. National Heritage Resources The proposed location of the SAHRA 1999 Act (No. 25 of 1999) development is found near known memorial and grave sites as well as SAN rock paintings. National Water Act (No. 36 of The proposed development will Department of Water 1998 1998) take place on the banks of the and Sanitation (DWS) Vaal River and may require the abstraction of water.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

12. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiation YES NO phase? If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3

How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

Solid waste must be stored in a central, secured location as far as possible from the watercourse and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site.

Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West.

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3 How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)? All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West. If the solid waste will be disposed of into a municipal waste stream, indicate which registered landfill site will be used. Solid waste will be disposed of into either the Delportshoop or Barkly West licensed municipal landfills. Where will the solid waste be disposed of if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)? N/A If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the NEM:WA? YES NO If YES, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application.

Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment facility? YES NO If YES, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application. b) Liquid effluent

Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed of YES NO in a municipal sewage system? If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3 Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

If YES, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another YES NO facility? If YES, provide the particulars of the facility: Facility name: Contact person: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

A natural reed bed soak away system will be implemented to treat the sewage produced by the development, returning near river quality water. Grey water will be pumped from the septic tank to the 250m2 reed bed that will be situated a great distance away from the river. The sludge will be approximately 0.1m3/person/year, and the septic tank will have to be desludged yearly.

The water from the reed beds can be used for gardening, while for other requirements, rain water harvesting is recommended. c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere other that exhaust emissions YES NO and dust associated with construction phase activities? If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO If YES, the applicant must consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. If NO, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration: Small amounts of dust will be generated during the construction phase. This however, will be mitigated. d) Waste permit

Will any aspect of the activity produce waste that will require a waste permit in terms YES NO of the NEM:WA?

If YES, please submit evidence that an application for a waste permit has been submitted to the competent authority e) Generation of noise

Will the activity generate noise? YES NO If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Describe the noise in terms of type and level: Noise relating to general construction activities will occur during the construction phase when heavy equipment and machinery will be used. These noise issues will be mitigated. During the operational phase, noise may arise from resort users and their vehicles, but these are expected to be of a low intensity and require no mitigation action.

13. WATER USE

Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es):

Other River, stream, The activity will Municipal Water board Groundwater (rain water dam or lake not use water harvesting)

If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other 651 kilolitres natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month: Does the activity require a water use authorisation (general authorisation or water YES NO use license) from the Department of Water Affairs? If YES, please provide proof that the application has been submitted to the Department of Water Affairs. (application not lodged yet)

14. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, which have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:

The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air conditioners etc. for Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:

The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air conditioners etc. for the Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Important notes: 1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section B Copy No. (e.g. A):

2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.

3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for each specialist thus appointed and attach it in Appendix I. All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

Property Province Northern Province description/physi District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality cal address: Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 281 (PNIEL) number Portion number 0-Remaining Extent SG Code C00700000000028100000

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 282, number Portion number 0 SG Code C00700000000028200000

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 283 (Gong-Gong) number Portion number 2 SG Code C00700000000028300002

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 284 number Portion number 0-Remaining Extent SG Code C00700000000028400000

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 284 number Portion number 1 SG Code C00700000000028400001

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 371 number Portion number 0-Remaining Extent SG Code C00700000000037100000

Province Northern Province District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ward Number(s) Ward 5 Farm name and Farm 372 (BAD HOPE) number Portion number 0 SG Code C00700000000037200000

Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g. linear activities), please attach a full list to this application including the same information as indicated above.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Current land-use Current land uses identified in the area are: low density residential use, alluvial mining and zoning as per the Good Hope Nature Reserve. local municipality IDP/records: In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, please attach a list of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions each use pertains to, to this application.

Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required? YES NO

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE

Indicate the general gradient of the site.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 8 indicating the gradient of the proposed site.

Alternative S1: Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5 Alternative S2 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5 Alternative S3 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE

Figure 9 illustrating the location of the proposed Gong-Gong development (indicated by the red square) in relation to landform features.

Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:

2.1 Ridgeline 2.4 Closed valley 2.7 Undulating plain / low hills X 2.2 Plateau 2.5 Open valley X 2.8 Dune 2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain 2.6 Plain X 2.9 Seafront 2.10 At sea

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE

GEOLOGY Kimberlite pipes surface in the eastern part of the District, particularly around Kimberley and Windsorton, in combinations of shale and tilite. In some instances deposits from these pipes have washed down the rivers creating opportunities for alluvial diamond mining. Large deposits of lime stone are found in the junction between the dolomite and sedimentary systems along the Ghaap Escarpment in the Ulco area (FBDM Spatial Development Framework: October 2007).

Figure 10: Map indicating the underlying geology of the Gong-Gong development area and surroundings.

SOILS The study area is covered by recent colluvial and alluvial sandy, gravelly, silty and clayey soils overlying residual soils and bedrock belonging to the Karoo, Transvaal and Ventersdorp Supergroups, numerous younger Post-Karoo dolerite dykes and sills are intruded into these formations. The major portion (some 65% of the surface area) of the FBDM is underlain by dolomite and chert bedrock belonging to the Campbell Rand Formation, Ghaap Group, Transvaal Supergroup

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 11: Map indicating the soil associations in the Gong-Gong Eco-village development area.

GROUND WATER

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 12 indicating the positions of boreholes in the area.

Is the site(s) located on any of the following?

Alternative S1: Alternative S2 Alternative S3 (if any): (if any): Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep) YES NO YES NO YES NO Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas YES NO YES NO YES NO Seasonally wet soils (often close to water YES NO YES NO YES NO bodies) Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with YES NO YES NO YES NO loose soil Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water) YES NO YES NO YES NO Soils with high clay content (clay fraction more YES NO YES NO YES NO than 40%) Any other unstable soil or geological feature YES NO YES NO YES NO An area sensitive to erosion YES NO YES NO YES NO

If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the completion of this section. Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted.

4. GROUNDCOVER

Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site. The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).

Natural veld with Natural veld - Natural veld with Veld dominated heavy alien Gardens good conditionE scattered aliensE by alien speciesE infestationE Building or other Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Bare soil structure

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise.

NOTE: EOH CES has the necessary expertise and specialist knowledge to complete this section.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

5. SURFACE WATER

Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites?

Perennial River YES NO UNSURE Non-Perennial River YES NO UNSURE Permanent Wetland YES NO UNSURE Seasonal Wetland YES NO UNSURE Artificial Wetland YES NO UNSURE Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO UNSURE

If any of the boxes marked YES or UNSURE is ticked, please provide a description of the relevant watercourse.

The development occurs along the banks of the Vaal River: the largest tributary of the Orange River in South Africa. The river has its source near Breyten in Mpumalanga provinve, wherefrom it flows westward towards its conjunction with the Orange River southwest of Kimberley.

6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site and give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:

Natural area Dam or reservoir Polo fields Low density residential Hospital/medical centre Filling station H Medium density residential School Landfill or waste treatment site High density residential Tertiary education facility Plantation Informal residentialA Church Agriculture Retail commercial & warehousing Old age home River, stream or wetland Light industrial Sewage treatment plantA Nature conservation area Medium industrial AN Train station or shunting yard N Mountain, koppie or ridge Heavy industrial AN Railway line N Museum Power station Major road (4 lanes or more) N Historical building Office/consulting room Airport N Protected Area Military or police Harbour Graveyard base/station/compound Spoil heap or slimes damA Sport facilities Archaeological site Quarry, sand or borrow pit Golf course Other land uses (describe)

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how this impact will / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A

If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A

Does the proposed site (including any alternative sites) fall within any of the following:

Critical Biodiversity Area (as per provincial conservation plan) YES NO Core area of a protected area? YES NO Buffer area of a protected area? YES NO Planned expansion area of an existing protected area? YES NO Existing offset area associated with a previous Environmental Authorisation? YES NO Buffer area of the SKA? YES NO

If the answer to any of these questions was YES, a map indicating the affected area must be included in Appendix A.

7. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in YES NO section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the Uncertain site? If YES, explain:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

There are a number of significant cultural and historical heritage elements found on the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, as the developments concept is based on attracting tourism to the area by making these elements more accessible to the public while protecting them for future generations.

These heritage elements include:

Historical building: old miner’s house.

Graveyard found in the proposed development area.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Rock paintings believed to be of San origin are found onsite.

Stone packed graves believed to be a memorial site.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field (archaeology or palaeontology) to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist: A Heritage Impact Assessment is recommended.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources YES NO Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)? If YES, please provide proof that this permit application has been submitted to SAHRA or the relevant provincial authority.

8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER a) Local Municipality

Please provide details on the socio-economic character of the local municipality in which the proposed site(s) are situated.

Level of unemployment:

The unemployment rate in Dikgatlong is 40%, with the youth unemployment rate standing at 49,0%(StatsSA).

Figure 13: The unemployment rate in local municipalities.

Economic profile of local municipality:

The Dikgatlong Local Municipalities economy is driven primarily by livestock, irrigation farming and commercial mining.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 14: Economic sector distrobution of the DLM population(from DLM SDF).

Figure 15a & 15b: Income statistics for local municipalities.

Level of education:

The main contributing factor to the low levels of employment in Dikgatlong is the high percentage (86,2%) of the labour force that has not obtained a Grade 12 Senior Certificate or higher qualification, resulting in a primarily unskilled labour force(StatsSA).

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Figure 16: indicating the education level of the Dikgatlong Local Municipalities population (from DLM SDF).

b) Socio-economic value of the activity

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? Unknown What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the Unknown activity? Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development and Unknown construction phase of the activity/ies? What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the Unknown development and construction phase? What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the Unknown operational phase of the activity? What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the Unknown first 10 years? What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown

9. BIODIVERSITY

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the biodiversity occurring on the site and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with the identification of the biodiversity occurring on site and the ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used. A map of the relevant biodiversity information (including an indication of the habitat conditions as per (b) below) and must be provided as an overlay map to the property/site plan as Appendix D to this report.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

a) Indicate the applicable biodiversity planning categories of all areas on site and indicate the reason(s) provided in the biodiversity plan for the selection of the specific area as part of the specific category)

If CBA or ESA, indicate the reason(s) for its Systematic Biodiversity Planning Category selection in biodiversity plan Ecological Other No Natural Critical Support Natural Area Biodiversity Area Area Remaining Area (CBA) (ESA) (ONA) (NNR) b) Indicate and describe the habitat condition on site

Percentage of Description and additional Comments and habitat Observations Habitat Condition condition (Including additional insight into condition, e.g. poor class (adding land management practises, presence of quarries, up to 100%) grazing, harvesting regimes etc). Only a very small portion of the proposed area is in its natural state due to historical alluvial mining activities in Natural <10% the area and later use as grazing land. This consists of small patches or clumps of natural vegetation. Near Natural Only a very small portion of the proposed area remains in (includes areas with a near natural state as a result of historical alluvial mining low to moderate level <15% activities in the area and later use as grazing land. of alien invasive plants) Degraded A large proportion of the site proposed for the Gong-Gong (includes areas Eco-cultural village has been degraded in the past through >65% heavily invaded by historical alluvial mining practices and use as grazing alien plants) pasture. Transformed A portion of the proposed area is classified as transformed (includes cultivation, land, being used as low density residential properties and 10% dams, urban, well as a graveyard in the vicinity. plantation, roads, etc) c) Complete the table to indicate: (i) the type of vegetation, including its ecosystem status, present on the site; and (ii) whether an aquatic ecosystem is present on site.

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems

Ecosystem threat Critical Wetland (including rivers, status as per the Endangered depressions, channelled and Estuary Coastline National Vulnerable unchanneled wetlands, flats,

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems Environmental seeps pans, and artificial Management: Least wetlands) Biodiversity Act (Act Threatened YES NO UNSURE YES NO YES NO No. 10 of 2004) d) Please provide a description of the vegetation type and/or aquatic ecosystem present on site, including any important biodiversity features/information identified on site (e.g. threatened species and special habitats)

The site identified for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village falls within the extensive Kimberly Thornveld vegitation type. Kimberly Thornveld is classified as least threatened and dominated by tree species such as Acacia mellifera, Boscia foetida and Acacia tortillis and shrub species such as Grewia flava and Aptosimum albomarginatum. There is a moderate presence of alien vegitation species dominated by Argemone ochroleuca, Laggera decurrens and Lactuca serriola.

The protected tree species Boscia foetida occurs in this area and special care must be taken not to desturb these individuals. Special habitat areas inculde the Vaal river and buffer zone where small amounts of Highveld Alluvial Vegitation may occur.

Figure 17: SANBI vegetation map for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village site and surrounds.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

1. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE

Publication name Volksblad Date published 29th August 2016 Site notice position Latitude Longitude 28°28'28.61"S 24°25'9.62"E 28°30'20.91"S 24°27'23.15"E Date placed 31st May 2016

Include proof of the placement of the relevant advertisements and notices in Appendix E1.

2. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES

Provide details of the measures taken to include all potential I&APs as required by Regulation 41(2)(e) and 41(6) of GN 733.

Key stakeholders (other than organs of state) identified in terms of Regulation 41(2)(b) of GN 733

Title, Name and Surname Affiliation/ key stakeholder status Contact details (tel number or e-mail address) Jabu Hayes Dikgatlong Tourism Association [email protected] Corrie Solomans Gong-Gong CPA Chairman [email protected] G.J Phashe PNIEL CPA Chairman [email protected] Ms Valerie Drift The Griqua Peoples Heritage NPC [email protected]

Include proof that the key stakeholder received written notification of the proposed activities as Appendix E2. This proof may include any of the following:

 e-mail delivery reports;  registered mail receipts;  courier waybills;  signed acknowledgements of receipt; and/or  or any other proof as agreed upon by the competent authority.

3. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

Summary of main issues raised by I&APs Summary of response from EAP Illegal mining currently happening opposite the Noted proposed facility

Proposed mining by the CPA Noted The lack of impartiality by the Dikgatlong Noted

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Municipality Land ownership Noted

4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT

The practitioner must record all comments received from I&APs and respond to each comment before the Draft BAR is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to the Final BAR as Appendix E3.

5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION

Authorities and organs of state identified as key stakeholders:

Authority/Organ Contact Tel No Fax e-mail Postal of State person No address (Title, Name and Surname) Northern Cape Dineo 0538077430 N/A [email protected] N/A Department of Moleko

Environment and Nature Conservation (DENC)

Northern Cape Buyisile 0538367600 N/A [email protected] N/A DWS July

COGHSTA Joey Botes 0605467557 N/A [email protected] N/A

Frances Baard Mr 0538380911 N/A [email protected] N/A Lebogang District Municipality Molefi

Dikgatlong Local Eddie 0535316500 N/A [email protected] N/A Municipality Manuel

Include proof that the Authorities and Organs of State received written notification of the proposed activities as appendix E4.

In the case of renewable energy projects, Eskom and the SKA Project Office must be included in the list of Organs of State.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

Note that, for any activities (linear or other) where deviation from the public participation requirements may be appropriate, the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements of that sub-regulation to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority.

Proof of any such agreement must be provided, where applicable. Application for any deviation from the regulations relating to the public participation process must be submitted prior to the commencement of the public participation process.

A list of registered I&APs must be included as appendix E5.

Copies of any correspondence and minutes of any meetings held must be included in Appendix E6.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2014 and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts.

1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

Provide a summary and anticipated significance of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed. This impact assessment must be applied to all the identified alternatives to the activities identified in Section A(2) of this report.

Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION YES YES N/A AND POLICY COMPLIANCE Failure to adhere to Failure of the existing policies and contractor to obligations. implement mitigation measures included in EA and EMPr. ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS YES YES YES Inappropriate layout Loss of natural Loss of natural planning and structural vegetation and vegetation and design leading to erosion of disturbed fauna by removal soil erosion, sites. by resort users. damage of riparian vegetation, and contamination of surface water. SANITATION YES YES YES Failure to investigate Inadequate and Failure of the suitable sites for the inappropriate ablution monitoring system proposed treatment facilities provided for and inadequate facility. construction workers maintenance.

YES Inadequate planning with regards to storage capacity requirements

SURFACE WATER RUNOFF YES YES YES Inadequate planning Uncontrolled Failure to maintain and provision for storm management of storm storm water water. water. drainage system

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION and monitor the effectiveness of storm water management measures. RIVER CROSSING YES YES N/A Inappropriate Inappropriate placement of the construction methods proposed swing bridge used in the riverine leading to unnecessary area. damage to the sensitive riverine environment. WASTE MANANGEMENT YES YES YES Failure to plan for the Building construction Implementation of storage and disposal of rubble. waste storage and waste. Litter management. disposal practices. Storage of hazardous waste. SITING OF STRUCTURES YES N/A N/A Inappropriate layout planning for the siting of buildings and sanitation system infrastructure. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL YES N/A N/A Inappropriate architectural design

STORAGE of HAZARDOUS YES YES N/A SUBSTANCES Inadequate planning Site contamination for storage of due to inappropriate hazardous substances. storage, usage and spillage of hazardous substances CONCRETE BATCHING N/A YES Inappropriate concrete batching methods leading to contamination of surface water. TRAFFIC AND ACCESS ROUTES YES YES N/A Inadequate planning Increased use of for increased traffic. servitude road by construction vehicles. TECHNOLOGIES EMPLOYED YES N/A YES Inadequate Inadequate consideration of water monitoring of the

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION and energy effectiveness of consumption reducing water and energy technologies. consumption reducing technologies. NOISE POLLUTION N/A N/A N/A AIR POLLUTION (Dust) N/A N/A N/A ON STE FIRE RISK N/A YES YES Fires onsite could pose a threat to the environment and adjacent landowners. SOCIO-ECONOMIC YES YES YES Planning to maximise Job creation Job creation, local job opportunities. Local economic development

Planning and Design Phase

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) Failure to Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The planning and design of adhere to planning and design phase, failure NEGATIVE the proposed Gong-Gong relevant to adhere to relevant Eco-cultural development environmental environmental regulations and must take into account, regulations legislation could lead to the project and comply with all and conflicting with local, provincial relevant environmental legislation. and national policies, legislation legislation and policy. etc. This could result in lack of  In addition, planning for the institutional support for the project, construction and operation overall project failure and undue of the proposed Gong- disturbance to the natural Gong Eco-cultural environment. development must take into account and consider any available best practice guidelines. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Impacting Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  An Environmental Control Ecology planning and design phase, poor NEGATIVE Officer must be consulted planning and placement of all in the detailed planning development and infrastructure and design of infrastructure may result in unnecessary in order to minimise the damage and disturbance to natural disturbance of natural

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation vegetation (Kimberly Thornveld). vegetation for the development.  All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or transplanted.  Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving grasses, must be undertaken. Indirect impacts: During the HIGH  The Gong-Gong Eco- planning and design phase, poor NEGATIVE cultural development layout design (i.e. inappropriate project layout must be utilisation of sensitive systems designed to ensure that the such as the Vaal River and minimum disturbance of riparian vegetation) increases the sensitive areas such as the risk of erosion and degradation of watercourse is achieved as watercourses and associated far as is reasonable and habitats. practical.  The Lodge and conference venue must not be located within flood prone areas.  A buffer of at least 50m must be maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.  Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc.) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License. Cumulative impacts:

Sewage Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The sewage treatment treatment planning and design, poor NEGATIVE system must be situated at facility planning with regards to the least 100m away from the resorts’ sanitation requirements 100 year flood line. may result in a breakdown of the  The sewage treatment system or overflows of sewage system must have the causing contamination of the capacity to contain surrounding environment and overflows. water resource.  The system design must be able to easily deal with the facility’s sanitation requirements even during peak season.  Sanitation designs must be

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Managing Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  The proposed Gong-Gong surface water planning and design phase, failure NEGATIVE Eco-cultural development runoff to plan properly for storm water must be located at least (e.g. inadequate planning for 50m away from the river storm water drainage and routing and any other of storm water flow, resulting from watercourses. increased hard surface area and  A Storm water subsequent increase in quantity Management Plan must be and velocity of runoff) could result designed and implemented in uncontrolled storm water runoff to ensure maximum water which can cause flooding and seepage at the source of erosion and also result in water flow. The plan must contamination of surface water also include management and groundwater resources. mitigation measures for water pollution, waste water management and the management of surface erosion e.g. by considering the applicability of contouring, etc.  The Storm water Management Plan must be designed by a qualified engineer. Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE Same as above. planning and design phase, failure NEGATIVE to plan properly for storm water (e.g. inadequate planning for storm water drainage and routing of storm water flow, resulting from increased hard surface area and subsequent increase in quantity and velocity of runoff) could result in uncontrolled storm water runoff which can cause flooding and erosion and also result in contamination of surface water and groundwater resources. Cumulative impacts:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Planning the Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The planning and design of hang bridge planning and design phase, the NEGATIVE the river crossing must be river crossing inappropriate design of the located in an area least proposed hang bridge across the prone to erosion, and take Vaal River could lead to soil into account the ability for erosion and sedimentation of the bank restoration, re- watercourse. vegetation and stabilization.  The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Waste Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  A waste management plan management planning and design phase, NEGATIVE for handling onsite waste inappropriate planning for must be developed and management and disposal of implemented. waste could result in surface and  An appropriate area where ground water contamination. waste can be stored before disposal must be designated. Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE Same as above. planning and design phase, NEGATIVE inappropriate planning for management and disposal of waste could result in surface and ground water contamination.

Cumulative impacts:

Planning for Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  The sewage treatment the siting of planning and design phase, poor NEGATIVE infrastructure must be structures planning for the siting of the situated at least 50m away

sewage treatment infrastructure from the 100 year flood could result in inadvertent spillage line. or run-off of effluent into the river.  The system must have adequate capacity to contain overflows. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Landscape Direct impacts: During the LOW Sighting and scale of and visual planning and design phase, NEGATIVE structures:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation considerations inappropriate architectural design  An independent or lack of aesthetic considerations Environmental Control may result in aesthetic impacts on Office (ECO) must assist the currently open landscape. in the sighting of development.  An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.  Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.  Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).  Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures. Indirect impacts: During the LOW Same as above. planning and design phase, NEGATIVE inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.

Cumulative impacts: During the LOW Same as above. planning and design phase, NEGATIVE inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.

Planning for Direct impacts: During the LOW  All hazardous substances the storage of planning and design phase, NEGATIVE such as paints, diesel and

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation hazardous inappropriate planning for the cement must be stored in a substances storage of hazardous substances bunded area with an such as diesel, paint, pesticides impermeable surface etc., used onsite could lead to beneath them. surface and ground water pollution  The developer must (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of designate appropriate diesel etc.). In addition, these areas for the storage of hazardous substances could be hazardous substances. washed off into the nearby watercourse. Indirect impacts: During the LOW Same as above. planning and design phase, NEGATIVE inappropriate planning for the storage of hazardous substances such as diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used onsite could lead to surface and ground water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse. Cumulative impacts:

Traffic and Direct impacts: During the HIGH  All internal roads should transport planning and design phase, NEGATIVE be located at least 50m consideration inappropriate routing of internal away from any roads through or close to watercourse. Where watercourses could lead to unavoidable, roads must unnecessary impacts on riparian avoid sensitive areas. vegetation.  If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL). Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts: Failure to Direct impacts: During the MODERATE Water: employ green planning and design phase, failure NEGATIVE  Rainwater tanks should be technology to consider technologies that considered in the design reduce consumption of natural and planning phase. Tanks resources (particularly water and will reduce the runoff electricity) will result in lost created by the housing opportunity to conserve resources. footprint and reduce municipal water usage.  Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss. Energy:  Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.  Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Construction Phase

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) Failure to Direct impacts: comply with the EMPr Indirect impacts: During the HIGH  The developer must construction phase the failure of NEGATIVE employ an independent the contractor to implement Environmental Control mitigation measures can result in Officer (ECO) for the non-compliance with the EA and construction phase to EMPr. ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr. Cumulative impacts:

Impacting Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The final design and layout ecology construction phase, unnecessary NEGATIVE must reviewed by the damage and loss of natural and appointed ECO to ensure vulnerable vegetation (Kimberly compliance with the

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Thornveld and riparian vegetation) approved layout. as well as heritage sites beyond  Construction activities and the development footprint my vegetation removal must result due to uncontrolled be limited to the construction activities. developmental footprint to avoid unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil erosion.  Where vegetation has been cleared, site rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re- vegetation must be undertaken.  Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.  Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation. Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Alien plants must be construction phase, land NEGATIVE removed from the site disturbance can lead to increased through appropriate spreading of noxious weeds and methods e.g. hand pulling, invasive alien plants. chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.  After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.  Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented. Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  All staff employed during construction phase, there is the NEGATIVE construction must undergo potential risk of poaching of environmental induction indigenous wild animals by staff training. employed by the contractor  No construction workers should reside onsite.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Wind screening and storm construction phase, soil exposure NEGATIVE water control should be due to clearing of land may result undertaken to prevent soil in erosion, which in turn may erosion during cause sedimentation of the construction. watercourses  All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.  Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.  Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.  Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Sanitation Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Adequate sanitary and construction phase, the lack of ablutions facilities must be appropriate sanitation facilities for provided for construction construction workers could lead to workers the contamination of ground and  The facilities must be ground water. regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.  Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Managing Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  During construction the surface water construction phase, runoff of storm NEGATIVE site must be managed in a runoff water containing contaminants, silt manner that prevents and litter may contaminate the pollution of drains, surrounding environment. downstream watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation chemical pollutants.  Litter must be controlled on site.  Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.  Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution. Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE Same as above. construction phase, runoff of storm NEGATIVE water containing contaminants, silt and litter may contaminate the surrounding environment. Cumulative impacts:

Construction Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The construction of the of hang- construction phase the building of NEGATIVE bridge must take place in bridge water a bridge across the watercourse the shortest possible time crossing could lead to soil erosion and period and during the low sedimentation of the watercourse. rainfall season.  Bank restoration, re- vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stabilization. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management Direct impacts: Construction MODERATE  An environmental of waste rubble left onsite may attract NEGATIVE management programme vermin and encourage the growth incorporating waste of opportunistic alien vegetation. management issues during Pollution potential if construction the construction phase of waste is not adequately disposed the project must be of (i.e. left on site). developed and implemented.  Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation appropriate landfill site.  All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface. Direct impacts: During MODERATE  Construction personnel construction there is the potential NEGATIVE must be educated in risk of littering on and around the appropriate waste site by the contractor, which can management practices. become unsightly and in some  Collected waste must be cases lead to health risks. separated and stored by type when feasible.  Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.  Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site  The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal. Indirect impacts: Construction MODERATE  An environmental rubble left onsite may attract NEGATIVE management programme vermin and encourage the growth incorporating waste of opportunistic alien vegetation. management issues during Pollution potential if construction the construction phase of waste is not adequately disposed the project must be of (i.e. left on site). developed and implemented.  Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.  All construction materials

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface. Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE  Construction material must construction phase there is the NEGATIVE be removed to an potential for the inappropriate approved, licenced off-site disposal of construction material disposal site by the off-site and subsequently polluting appointment of a reputable the environment. waste services provider. Cumulative impacts:

Management Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  The storage of potentially of hazardous construction phase inappropriate NEGATIVE hazardous material must substances storage and disposal of hazardous be controlled to reduce building material may pollute the the risk of environmental soil and ground water. contamination.  Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.  All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.  All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Concrete Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Cement and concrete batching construction phase inappropriate NEGATIVE must not be mixed directly cement mixing techniques can on the ground, or during lead to ground and ground water rainfall events when the pollution. potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation  All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Traffic and Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Road maintenance should access construction phase, increased use NEGATIVE take place regularly, routes of access roads by heavy especially after heavy machinery will cause further rains. degradation to the gravel tracks. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

On-site fires Direct impacts: During the HIGH  All onsite fires must be construction phase, fires started at NEGATIVE controlled. construction camps could result in  The construction personnel uncontrolled fires, posing a threat must be educated to wild animals, indigenous regarding fire and fire vegetation and the surrounding management. landowners.  Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.  In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances. o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances. o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation

Socio- Direct impacts: economic stimulation Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE No mitigation. construction phase, there may be POSITIVE temporary job-creation for members of the community.

Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE  Access control to the site construction phase increased NEGATIVE must ensure no number of labourers could lead to unauthorised person shall an increase in security risks in the enter. community.  The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site. Cumulative impacts:

Operational Phase

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) Ecological Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  The facility operator must disturbance operational phase, the NEGATIVE monitor disturbed sites for inappropriate disturbance of land erosion and the spread of may increase spreading of noxious alien vegetation etc. and weeds, invasive and alien plants in implement remedial the development open space area actions. and surrounds.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Sewage Direct impacts: During the HIGH  No treated effluent may be treatment operational phase, if the sewage NEGATIVE discharged into any facility treatment facility is not adequately watercourse. maintained, effluent of poor quality  Ground water monitoring may be released into the boreholes must be environment, contaminating water regularly tested for sources with nutrient and faecal possible contamination of coliforms. groundwater.  Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be analysed quarterly to confirm the

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.  Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.  The approved maintenance plan must be implemented. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management Direct impacts: During the HIGH  The effectiveness of the of surface operational phase the failure to NEGATIVE flood attenuation and storm water runoff maintain storm water management water management measures may result in soil measures must be erosion and stream sedimentation. monitored.  The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.  If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented. Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management Direct impacts: During the MODERATE  Waste must be properly of waste operational phase inappropriate NEGATIVE managed by separating waste storage and disposal compostable waste, and practices may lead to litter, providing storage for pollution, general nuisances and recyclable waste materials health hazards. and wastes which must be disposed of into a licensed landfill. Indirect impacts:

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation

Cumulative impacts:

Employing Direct impacts: During the HIGH  Measures must be taken to resource operational phase, increased reduce the consumption of saving water and energy consumption natural resources. technologies may lead to a loss in natural  Measures should include, resources such as water and but not be limited to, the energy. installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Socio- Direct impacts: economic consideration Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE No mitigation. operational phase there may be POSITIVE increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy.

Indirect impacts: During the MODERATE No mitigation. operational phase, there may be POSITIVE potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value. Cumulative impacts:

No-go option Cancelling Direct impacts: Degradation and MODERATE No mitigation. the proposed misuse of site due to possible NEGATIVE development. mining and poor land use management. Direct impacts: All negative MODERATE No mitigation. activities from the proposed POSITIVE development will be avoided Direct impacts: Construction job MODERATE No mitigation. losses NEGATIVE

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts:

A complete impact assessment in terms of Regulation 19(3) of GN 733 must be included as Appendix F.

2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually occurring and the significance of impacts.

Alternative A (preferred alternative) It is the opinion of EOH CES that this Basic Assessment Report contains sufficient information to allow DENC to make an informed decision. EOH CES therefore recommends that the application for Authorisation should be approved on condition that the recommended mitigation measures stated herein are effectively implemented.

Alternative B

Alternative C

No-go alternative (compulsory) The no-go option for development entails that the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village development will not go ahead. This would be accompanied by the following impacts:  Loss of employment opportunities associated with the project.  Loss of potential economic opportunities and economic growth.  Eco-tourism opportunities associated with the project would be lost.

Without the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village, the local community will not benefit from the direct job opportunities associated with its construction and operation, while the district will miss out on the economic benefits of increased tourism opportunities associated with the development. Finally, if the development does not take place, the site will continue to be mined illegally and used for grazing land, leading to further degradation and ultimate loss of tourism opportunities associated with the areas natural beauty.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER

Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached hereto sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of the YES NO environmental assessment practitioner)?

If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment). N/A

If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application. All mitigation measures recommended in the document should be considered and included. Is an EMPr attached? YES NO The EMPr must be attached as Appendix G.

The details of the EAP who compiled the BAR and the expertise of the EAP to perform the Basic Assessment process must be included as Appendix H.

If any specialist reports were used during the compilation of this BAR, please attach the declaration of interest for each specialist in Appendix I.

Any other information relevant to this application and not previously included must be attached in Appendix J.

______NAME OF EAP

______SIGNATURE OF EAP DATE

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

SECTION F: APPENDIXES

The following appendixes must be attached:

Cadastral map illustrating the position of the proposed Gong-Gong development.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix A: Maps

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix B: Photographs

As the development is spread out over a large area, the usual method of taking eight pictures in the main compass directions is unsuitable. Below are pictures illustrating the areas proposed for each activity on site.

Boardwalk Location

Braai Area Location

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Hang Bridge

Panoramic Views

28°30'32.26"S 24°23'40.93"E

Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the Lodge.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

28°30'52.12"S 24°23'27.05"E

Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the conference centre.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix D: Specialist reports (including terms of reference)

None

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 1: Advertisements and Notices

Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 1 Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 2

Figure illustrating the Notice signs places at the entrance to the access roads leading to the proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 2: Stakeholder Notification

Figure illustrating the email together with attached Background Information Document and Notification letter sent to all I&AP’s.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

I&AP database Organisation Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address Stakeholders Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation (DENC) Ms Dineo Moleko [email protected] 0538077430 Northern Cape DWS Mr Buyisile July [email protected] 053 836 7600 0828975114 Private Bag X 6101 / KIMBERLEY / 8300 Dikgatlong Tourism Association Mr Jabu Hayes [email protected] 0820551818 COGHSTA Ms Joey Botes [email protected] 0605467557 Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Joh-ne Jansen [email protected] 0538380911 Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Lebogang Molefi [email protected] 0538380911 Frances Baard District Municipality Mr N. Thompson [email protected] 0538380911 Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Mc Donald Booysen [email protected] 0723703716 Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Basil Louw [email protected] 0538380939 Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Samantha Alfonse [email protected] 0538380911 McGregor Museum Mr David Morris [email protected] 0538311761 0822224777 Dikgatlong Ward 5 Councelor Mr Martin Hendricks [email protected] 0828229272 Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Maureen Mgoma [email protected] 0727892838 Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Mary Scheepers 0737308654 Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ms Claudia Letsie [email protected] 0535310671 0827161085 Dikgatlong Local Municipality Mr Eddie Manuel [email protected] 0535316500 0825213149 Gong-Gong CPA Chairman Mr Corrie Solomans [email protected] 053-8731885 0823150215 PNIEL CPA Chairman Mr G.J Phashe [email protected] 0823315297 Gong-Gong Community Ms Wendy Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376 Gong-Gong Community Mr John Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376 Gong-Gong Community Ms Elizabeth Malan [email protected] 0783135607 Gong-Gong Community Mr Derek Oliphant NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0768883760 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8375 Gong-Gong Community Mr Xavier Jood [email protected] 0848508536 Gong-Gong Community Mr Willian Chabalala 0844444473 Gong-Gong CDC Mr H.U Drift 0720481810 Gong-Gong Community Ms Val Drift [email protected] 0726684117 One Fountain B&B Ms Telana van Zyl [email protected] 0827943126 Gong-Gong Community Mr Edward Snyders 0723422587 Farm Number Farm Name/Nr Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address Title Deed Landowners Farm 282 KIESER, JACOBUS FRANCOIS P O BOX 1416, SABIE, 1260 T1084/1967 Farm 282 Roos, Mabel T1084/1967 Farm 282 H.J Kock [email protected] 0722891955 283 portion 2 Gong-Gong DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003 PLAAS 284 DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003 PLAAS 284 Portion 1 BERLIN MISSION SOC [email protected] SYNOD TRUST 0538731885 0823150215 T11512/1910 Farm 372 Bad Hope GONG GONG COMMUNAL [email protected] ASSOCIATION 0823315297 T1952/2012 Farm 1/281 PNIEL (Portion 1) COMMITTEE OF BERLIN [email protected] SOC 0538731885 0823150215 T1118/1970 Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 0-remaining extent) DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003 Farm Number Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address Surrounding Landowners

Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) COSGROVE, DAVID DAWSON P O BOX 72020, PARKVIEW,2122 T1360/1997

Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) HOLMES, ALISTAIR GORDON DEAN P O BOX 121, DELPORTSHOOP, 8377 T1360/1997 Farm 280 THAN (portion 1) REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA T2079/1989 Farm 281 PNIEL (portion 0-remaining extent) NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA T432/2008 Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 1) TRANSNET LTD [email protected]/[email protected] PO Box 876, Keimoes, 8860 T3817/1992 I &APS 78

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 3: Comments and Response

DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 4: Authority Participation

Completed as part of Appendix E2.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 5: Registered I&AP’s

DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E 6: Meetings

A feasibility study focus group meeting was held at Barkly West library on 17th March 2016

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix F: Impact Assessment

ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation

Environmental Legal and Policy compliance

During the planning and design phase, Direct Long term Localised Probable Severe HIGH  The planning and design of the LOW failure to adhere to relevant NEGATIVE proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural NEGATIVE environmental regulations and development must take into account, legislation could lead to the project and comply with all relevant environmental legislation and policy. conflicting with local, provincial and  In addition, planning for the construction national policies, legislation etc. This and operation of the proposed Gong- could result in lack of institutional Gong Eco-cultural development must support for the project, overall project take into account and consider any failure and undue disturbance to the available best practice guidelines. natural environment

Ecological Impacts

Permanent loss of indigenous Direct Permanen Localised Definite Moderatel MODERATE  An Environmental Control Officer must LOW vegetation t y severe NEGATIVE be consulted in the detailed planning NEGATIVE and design of infrastructure in order to During the planning and design phase, minimise the disturbance of natural poor planning and placement of all vegetation for the development. development and infrastructure may  All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or result in unnecessary damage and transplanted. disturbance to natural vegetation  Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation

(Kimberly Thornveld) grasses, must be undertaken.

Disturbance of sensitive areas Direct/Indire Long term Study area Possible Moderatel HIGH  The Gong-Gong Eco-cultural LOW ct y severe NEGATIVE development project layout must be NEGATIVE During the planning and design phase, designed to ensure that the minimum poor layout design (i.e. inappropriate disturbance of sensitive areas such as utilisation of sensitive systems such as the watercourse is achieved as far as is the Vaal River and riparian vegetation) reasonable and practical.  The Lodge and concerence venue must increases the risk of erosion and not be located within flood prone areas. degradation of watercourses and  A buffer of at least 50m must be associated habitats. maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.  Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License. Sanitation

During the planning and design, poor Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH  The sewage treatment system must be LOW planning with regards to the resorts’ NEGATIVE situated at least 100m away from the NEGATIVE sanitation requirements may result in a 100 year flood line. breakdown of the system or overflows  The sewage treatment system must have the capacity to contain overflows. of sewage causing contamination of the  The system design must be able to surrounding environment and water easily deal with the facility’s sanitation resource. requirements even during peak season.  Sanitation designs must be submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required. Surface water runoff

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation

Storm water management Direct/Indire Long term Localised/ Possible Slightly MODERATE  The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural LOW ct nearby severe NEGATIVE development must be located at least NEGATIVE During the planning and design phase, watercourse 50m away from the river and any other failure to plan properly for storm water watercourses. (e.g. inadequate planning for storm  A Storm water Management Plan must water drainage and routing of storm be designed and implemented to ensure maximum water seepage at the water flow, resulting from increased source of water flow. The plan must hard surface area and subsequent also include management mitigation increase in quantity and velocity of measures for water pollution, waste runoff) could result in uncontrolled water management and the storm water runoff which can cause management of surface erosion e.g. by flooding and erosion and also result in considering the applicability of contamination of surface water and contouring, etc.  The Storm water Management Plan groundwater resources. must be designed by a qualified engineer. River crossing

During the planning and design phase, Direct Medium- Water Probable Moderatel HIGH  The planning and design of the river MODERATE the inappropriate design of the Term catchment y Severe NEGATIVE crossing must be located in an area NEGATIVE proposed hang bridge across the Vaal least prone to erosion, and take into River could lead to soil erosion and account the ability for bank restoration, sedimentation of the watercourse. re-vegetation and stabilization.  The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible. Management of waste

During the planning and design phase, Direct/ Short Localised Possible Moderatel MODERATE  A waste management plan for handling LOW inappropriate planning for management Indirect term y severe NEGATIVE onsite waste must be developed and NEGATIVE and disposal of waste could result in implemented.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation surface and ground water  An appropriate area where waste can be contamination. stored before disposal must be designated. Siting of structures

During the planning and design phase, Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH  The sewage treatment infrastructure LOW poor planning for the siting of the NEGATIVE must be situated at least 50m away NEGATIVE sewage treatment infrastructure could from the 100 year flood line. result in inadvertent spillage or run-off  The system must have adequate of effluent into the river. capacity to contain overflows.

Landscape and visual

During the planning and design phase, Direct/ Long term Localised Probable Moderate LOW Sighting and scale of structures: LOW inappropriate architectural design or Indirect/ to slight NEGATIVE  An independent Environmental Control NEGATIVE lack of aesthetic considerations may Office (ECO) must assist in the sighting result in aesthetic impacts on the Cumulative of development. currently open landscape.  An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.  Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.  Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation

 Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures. Storage of hazardous substances

During the planning and design phase, Direct/Indire Short Localised/ Possible Slight LOW  All hazardous substances such as LOW inappropriate planning for the storage ct term nearby NEGATIVE paints, diesel and cement must be NEGATIVE of hazardous substances such as watercourse stored in a bunded area with an diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used impermeable surface beneath them. onsite could lead to surface and ground  The developer must designate water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, appropriate areas for the storage of spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, hazardous substances. these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse.

Traffic and Transport

During the planning and design phase, Direct Long- Localised Probable Moderatel MODERATE  All internal roads should be located at LOW inappropriate routing of internal roads Term y Severe NEGATIVE least 50m away from any watercourse. NEGATIVE through or close to watercourses could Where unavoidable, roads must avoid lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian sensitive areas. vegetation.  If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL).

Technology employed

During the planning and design phase, Direct Long-term Surrounding Possible Moderate MODERATE Water: LOW failure to consider technologies that areas and NEGATIVE  Rainwater tanks should be considered in NEGATIVE reduce consumption of natural downstream the design and planning phase. Tanks

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significance impact extent Pre-mitigation Post- mitigation

resources (particularly water and will reduce the runoff created by the electricity) will result in lost opportunity housing footprint and reduce municipal to conserve resources. water usage.  Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss. Energy:  Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.  Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post- construction retrofitting.

ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

Environmental Legal and Policy compliance

During the construction phase the Indirect Short-Term Provincial Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE  The developer must employ an MODERAT failure of the contractor to implement independent Environmental Control E mitigation measures can result in non- Officer (ECO) for the construction phase NEGATIVE compliance with the EA and EMPr. to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr. Ecological Impacts

Loss of indigenous vegetation during Direct Short term Localised Probable Severe HIGH NEGATIVE  The final design and layout must LOW construction reviewed by the appointed ECO to NEGATIVE ensure compliance with the approved During the construction phase, layout. unnecessary damage and loss of  Construction activities and vegetation natural and vulnerable vegetation removal must be limited to the (Kimberly Thornveld and riparian developmental footprint to avoid vegetation) as well as heritage sites unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil beyond the development footprint my erosion. result due to uncontrolled construction  Where vegetation has been cleared, site activities. rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re-vegetation must be undertaken.  Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.  Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

maintained from the forest vegetation.

During the construction phase, land Direct Medium- Localised Possible Moderately MODERATE  Alien plants must be removed from the LOW disturbance can lead to increased Term severe NEGATIVE site through appropriate methods e.g. NEGATIVE spreading of noxious weeds and hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., invasive alien plants. and under the supervision of the ECO.  After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.  Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented. During the construction phase, there is Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately MODERATE  All staff employed during construction LOW the potential risk of poaching of severe NEGATIVE must undergo environmental induction NEGATIVE indigenous wild animals by staff training. employed by the contractor  No construction workers should reside onsite. During the construction phase, soil Direct Medium- Localised Possible Moderate MODERATE  Wind screening and storm water control LOW exposure due to clearing of land may Term and water NEGATIVE should be undertaken to prevent soil NEGATIVE result in erosion, which in turn may catchment erosion during construction. cause sedimentation of the  All erosion control mechanisms must be watercourses regularly maintained.  Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.  Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.  Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation. Sanitation

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

During the construction phase, the lack Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderate MODERATE  Adequate sanitary and ablutions LOW of appropriate sanitation facilities for and water NEGATIVE facilities must be provided for NEGATIVE construction workers could lead to the catchment construction workers contamination of ground and ground  The facilities must be regularly serviced water. to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.  Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse. Surface water runoff

During the construction phase, runoff of Direct/Indi Short term Watercourse Possible Moderately MODERATE  During construction the site must be LOW storm water containing contaminants, rect severe NEGATIVE managed in a manner that prevents NEGATIVE silt and litter may contaminate the pollution of drains, downstream surrounding environment. watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or chemical pollutants.  Litter must be controlled on site.  Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.  Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution. Stream crossing

During the construction phase, the Direct Medium- Localised Probable Moderately HIGH NEGATIVE  The construction of the bridge must take MODERAT building of a bridge across the Term and water Severe place in the shortest possible time E watercourse could lead to soil erosion catchment period and during the low rainfall NEGATIVE and downstream sedimentation of the season. watercourse.  Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

include the use of gabions for bank stabilization. Management of waste

Construction rubble left onsite may Direct/Indi Short term Localised Possible Moderately MODERATE  An environmental management LOW attract vermin and encourage the rect severe NEGATIVE programme incorporating waste NEGATIVE growth of opportunistic alien vegetation. management issues during the Pollution potential if construction waste construction phase of the project must is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left be developed and implemented. on site).  Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.  All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface. During construction there is the Direct Short-Term Localised Probable Moderately MODERATE  Construction personnel must be LOW potential risk of littering on and around and water severe NEGATIVE educated in appropriate waste NEGATIVE the site by the contractor, which can catchment management practices. become unsightly and in some cases  Collected waste must be separated lead to health risks. and stored by type when feasible.  Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.  Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site  The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal. During the construction phase there is Indirect Medium- Community Probable Moderate MODERATE  Construction material must be removed LOW the potential for the inappropriate Term NEGATIVE to an approved, licenced off-site NEGATIVE disposal of construction material off-site disposal site by the appointment of a and subsequently polluting the reputable waste services provider. environment. Management of hazardous substances

During the construction phase Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately MODERATE  The storage of potentially hazardous LOW inappropriate storage and disposal of severe NEGATIVE material must be controlled to reduce NEGATIVE hazardous building material may pollute the risk of environmental the soil and ground water. contamination.  Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.  All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.  All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated. Concrete Batching

During the construction phase Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately MODERATE  Cement and concrete must not be LOW inappropriate cement mixing techniques severe NEGATIVE mixed directly on the ground, or during NEGATIVE can lead to ground and ground water rainfall events when the potential for pollution transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

 All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line. Traffic and Access Routes During the construction phase, Direct Medium- Along road Probable Moderately MODERATE  Road maintenance should take place LOW increased use of access roads by Term severe NEGATIVE regularly, especially after heavy rains. NEGATIVE heavy machinery will cause further degradation to the gravel tracks. On-site Fires During the construction phase, fires Direct Short-Term Community Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE  All onsite fires must be controlled. LOW started at construction camps could  The construction personnel must be NEGATIVE result in uncontrolled fires, posing a educated regarding fire and fire threat to wild animals, indigenous management. vegetation and the surrounding  Fire extinguishers must be available landowners. onsite.  In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances. o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances. o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires. Socio-economic impacts

During the construction phase, there Indirect Short- Localised Probable Beneficial MODERATE  No mitigation provided MODERAT may be temporary job-creation for Term POSITIVE E POSITIVE members of the community.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre- Mitigation Significan impact extent mitigation ce Post- mitigation

During the construction phase Indirect Short- Community Possible Moderately MODERATE  Access control to the site must ensure LOW increased number of labourers could Term severe NEGATIVE no unauthorised person shall enter. NEGATIVE lead to an increase in security risks in  The site must be secured in order to the community. reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT. OPERATIONAL PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significan impact extent Pre-mitigation ce Post- mitigation

Ecological Impacts

During the operational phase, the Direct Medium- Localised Possible Moderatel MODERATE  The facility operator must monitor LOW inappropriate disturbance of land may Term y severe NEGATIVE disturbed sites for erosion and the NEGATIVE increase spreading of noxious weeds, spread of alien vegetation etc. and invasive and alien plants in the implement remedial actions. development open space area and surrounds. Sanitation

During the operational phase, if the Direct Medium- Localised Possible Severe HIGH  No treated effluent may be discharged LOW sewage treatment facility is not Term NEGATIVE into any watercourse. NEGATIVE adequately maintained, effluent of poor  Ground water monitoring boreholes quality may be released into the must be regularly tested for possible contamination of groundwater.

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

OPERATIONAL PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significan impact extent Pre-mitigation ce Post- mitigation environment, contaminating water  Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be sources with nutrient and faecal analysed quarterly to confirm the coliforms. effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.  Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.  The approved maintenance plan must be implemented. Surface water runoff

During the operational phase the failure Direct Long-Term Localised Probable Severe HIGH  The effectiveness of the flood MODERAT to maintain storm water management and water NEGATIVE attenuation and storm water E measures may result in soil erosion and catchment management measures must be NEGATIVE stream sedimentation. monitored.  The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.  If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented. Management of waste

During the operational phase Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Severe MODERATE  Waste must be properly managed by LOW inappropriate waste storage and NEGATIVE separating compostable waste, and NEGATIVE disposal practices may lead to litter, providing storage for recyclable waste

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

OPERATIONAL PHASE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significan impact extent Pre-mitigation ce Post- mitigation

pollution, general nuisances and health materials and wastes which must be hazards. disposed of into a licensed landfill. Technology employed

During the operational phase, Direct Long-Term Provincial Definite Severe HIGH  Measures must be taken to reduce the MODERAT increased water and energy NEGATIVE consumption of natural resources. E consumption may lead to a loss in  These measures should include, but not NEGATIVE natural resources such as water and be limited to, the installation of rainwater energy. tanks to reduce storm water runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power. Socio-economic impacts

During the operational phase there may Indirect Long-Term Community Probable Beneficial MODERATE  No mitigation provided. MODERAT be increased employment opportunities POSITIVE E POSITIVE and stimulation of the local economy. During the operational phase, there Indirect Medium- Community Possible UNKNO MODERATE  No mitigation provided. MODERAT may be potential long-term increases of Term WN POSITIVE E POSITIVE neighbouring land value.

ISSUES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE “NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE

“NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE

Impact Description Nature of Duration Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Mitigation Significanc Impact extent Pre-mitigation e Post- mitigation

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

 Degradation and misuse of site Direct Medium-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE  No mitigation provided. MODERAT due to possible mining and poor NEGATIVE E land use management. NEGATIVE  All negative activities from the Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE  No mitigation provided. MODERAT proposed development will be POSITIVE E POSITIVE avoided

 Construction job losses Direct Short-Term Localised Definite Moderate MODERATE  No mitigation provided. MODERAT NEGATIVE E NEGATIVE

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)

100

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise

1.1 Details of the EAP Dr Alan Carter Alan is the executive of the EOH East London Office. He holds a PhD in Marine Biology and is a certified Public Accountant, with extensive training and experience in both financial accounting and environmental science disciplines with international accounting firms in South Africa and the USA. He has 25 years’ experience in environmental management and has specialist skills in sanitation, coastal environments and industrial waste. Dr Carter is registered as a Professional Natural Scientist under the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP). He is also registered as an EAP by the Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa (EAPSA).

101

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

1.2 Expertise of the study team EOH Coastal and Environmental Services (EOH) was established in 1990 as a specialist environmental consulting company and has considerable experience in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecology, the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) process, State of Environment Reporting (SOER), Integrated Waste Management Plans (IWMP), Environmental Management Programme (EMPr), Spatial Development Frameworks (SDF), public participation, as well as the management and co-ordination of all aspects of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) processes. EOH has been active in all of the above fields, and in so doing have made a positive contribution towards environmental management and sustainable development in the Eastern Cape, South Africa and many other African countries. We believe that a balance between development and environmental protection can be achieved by skilful, considerate and careful planning.

102

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest

No specialist studies were conducted

103

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix J: Additional Information

N/A

104