DOCSLIB.ORG

Complete Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal REVIEWReserve Bank of St. Louis MARCH/APRIL 2005 VOLUME 87, NUMBER 2, PART 2 R EVIEW Reflections on Monetary Policy 25 Years After October 1979 Proceedings of a Special Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Origins of the Great Inflation Allan H. Meltzer MAR The Reform of October 1979: How It Happened and Why CH David E. Lindsey, Athanasios Orphanides, and Robert H. Rasche / APRIL The Monetary Policy Debate Since October 1979: Lessons for Theory and Practice 2005 • Marvin Goodfriend V The International Implications of October 1979: OL Toward a Long Boom on a Global Scale UME John B. Taylor 87, Panel Discussion I: What Have We Learned Since October 1979? N Ben S. Bernanke, Alan S. Blinder, and Bennett T. McCallum UMBER Panel Discussion II: Safeguarding Good Policy Practice Roger W. Ferguson Jr., Charles A.E. Goodhart, and William Poole 2, P AR Commentaries and Reflections T 2 Reflections on Monetary Policy REVIEW 25 Years After October 1979 137 Chairman’s Remarks Director of Research Alan Greenspan Robert H. Rasche Deputy Director of Research 139 Editors’ Introduction Cletus C. Coughlin Athanasios Orphanides Review Editor and Daniel L. Thornton William T. Gavin Research Economists 145 Origins of the Great Inflation Richard G. Anderson Allan H. Meltzer James B. Bullard Commentary Riccardo DiCecio 177 Michael J. Dueker Christina D. Romer Thomas A. Garrett Massimo Guidolin 187 The Reform of October 1979: Hui Guo Rubén Hernández-Murillo How It Happened and Why Kevin L. Kliesen David E. Lindsey, Athanasios Orphanides, Christopher J. Neely and Robert H. Rasche Edward Nelson 237 Commentary Michael T. Owyang Michael R. Pakko Stephen H. Axilrod Anthony N.M. Pennington-Cross Jeremy M. Piger 243 The Monetary Policy Debate Patricia S. Pollard Since October 1979: Daniel L. Thornton Howard J. Wall Lessons for Theory and Practice Christopher H. Wheeler Marvin Goodfriend David C. Wheelock 263 Commentary Managing Editor Laurence M. Ball George E. Fortier Assistant Editor 269 The International Implications Lydia H. Johnson of October 1979: Graphic Designer Toward a Long Boom Donna M. Stiller on a Global Scale The views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the John B. Taylor Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve System, or the Board of Governors. 277 Panel Discussion I: What Have We Learned Since October 1979? Ben S. Bernanke, Alan S. Blinder, and Bennett T. McCallum FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS REVIEW MARCH/APRIL, PART 2 2005 i 293 Panel Discussion II: 317 Charles Freedman Safeguarding Good Policy Practice Roger W. Ferguson Jr., Charles A.E. Goodhart, 323 Benjamin M. Friedman and William Poole Reflections 329 Otmar Issing The following reflections for this conference issue, which appear without editorial changes to content, 337 Georg Rich are essays and historical overviews, as well as personal accounts written by policymakers and Federal Reserve officials who were in office around the time of the 343 Frederick H. Schultz October 6, 1979, monetary policy action. 307 Robert P. Black 349 Anna J. Schwartz 311 Philip E. Coldwell 353 Edwin M. Truman 313 Joseph R. Coyne Review is published six times per year by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and may be accessed through our web site: research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review. All non- proprietary and nonconfidential data and programs for the articles written by Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis staff and published in Review are available to our readers on this web site. These data and programs are also available through Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) via their FTP site: www.icpsr.umich.edu/pra/index.html. Or contact the ICPSR at P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248; 734-647-5000; [email protected]. Single-copy subscriptions are available free of charge. Send requests to: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Public Affairs Department, P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, MO 63166-0442, or call (314) 444-8808 or 8809. General data can be obtained through FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data), a database providing U.S. economic and financial data and regional data for the Eighth Federal Reserve District. You may access FRED through our web site: research.stlouisfed.org/fred. Articles may be reprinted, reproduced, published, distributed, displayed, and transmitted in their entirety if copyright notice, author name(s), and full citation are included. Please send a copy of any reprinted, published, or displayed materials to George Fortier, Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, MO 63166-0442; [email protected]. Please note: Abstracts, synopses, and other derivative works may be made only with prior written permission of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Please contact the Research Division at the above address to request permission. Review is indexed and/or abstracted in Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Scisearch, Current Contents/ Social and Behavioral Sciences, ABI/Inform Global, Business and Company Resource Center, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, EconLit, Expanded Academic ASAP, General BusinessFile ASAP, Wilson Business Full Text, and Wilson Select Full Text. © 2005, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. ISSN 0014-9187 ii MARCH/APRIL, PART 2 2005 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS REVIEW Charles Freedman Contributing Authors 1757 Dunkirk Cres. Ottawa, ON K1H 5T3 Canada Stephen H. Axilrod 106 East 85th Street [email protected] Apartment 7N New York, NY 10028 Benjamin M. Friedman Department of Economics Littauer Center Laurence M. Ball Harvard University Department of Economics Cambridge, MA 02138 The John Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21218 [email protected] Marvin Goodfriend Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond P.O. Box 27622 Ben S. Bernanke Richmond, VA 23261 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve [email protected] System 20th Street and Constitution, NW Charles A.E. Goodhart Washington, DC 20551 London School of Economics [email protected] Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Robert P. Black England 10 Dahlgren Road [email protected] Richmond, VA 23238-6104 Alan Greenspan Alan S. Blinder Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 105 Fisher Hall System Department of Economics 20th Street and Constitution, NW Princeton University Washington, DC 20551 Princeton, NJ 08544 [email protected] Otmar Issing Executive Board of the European Central Bank Kaiserstr. 29 Philip E. Coldwell 3330 Southwestern Blvd. 60311 Frankfurt am Main Dallas, TX 75225 Germany [email protected] Joseph R. Coyne David E. Lindsey 4833 Western Avenue, NW 13017 Triple Crown Loop Washington, DC 20016 Gainesville, VA 20155 [email protected] Roger W. Ferguson Jr. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bennett T. McCallum System Graduate School of Industrial Administration 20th Street and Constitution, NW Carnegie Mellon University Washington, DC 20551 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 [email protected] [email protected] FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS REVIEW MARCH/APRIL, PART 2 2005 iii Allan H. Meltzer Christina D. Romer Tepper School of Business Department of Economics Carnegie Mellon University University of California, Berkeley Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Berkeley, CA 94720-3880 [email protected] [email protected] Athanasios Orphanides Frederick H. Schultz Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve P.O. Box 1200 System Jacksonville, FL 32201 20th Street and Constitution, NW Washington, DC 20551 Anna J. Schwartz [email protected] National Bureau of Economic Research 365 Fifth Avenure, Suite 5318, 5th Floor William Poole New York, NY 10016-4309 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis [email protected] P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166 John B. Taylor [email protected] Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW—Room 4448 Robert H. Rasche Washington, DC 20220 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis [email protected] P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166 Edwin M. Truman [email protected] Institute for International Economics 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Georg Rich Washington, DC 20036-1903 Parkweg 7 [email protected] CH-5000 Aarau Switzerland [email protected] iv MARCH/APRIL, PART 2 2005 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS REVIEW Chairman’s Remarks Alan Greenspan defining moment may shape the But the importance of price stability has some- direction of an institution for decades times been insufficiently appreciated in our to come. In the modern history of the central bank’s history, and, as Allan Meltzer will Federal Reserve, the action it took on soon point out, such episodes have had unfortu- AOctober 6, 1979, stands out as such a milestone nate consequences. and arguably as a turning point in our nation’s Far from being a bulwark of stability in the economic history. The policy change initiated 1970s, the Federal Reserve conducted policies under the leadership of Chairman Paul Volcker that, in the judgment of many analysts, inadver- on that Saturday morning in Washington rescued tently contributed to an environment of macro- our nation’s economy from a dangerous path of economic instability. We should strive to retain ever-escalating inflation and instability. As I in the collective memory of our institution the noted in congressional testimony before the ensuing lessons of that period. It may be the most Joint Economic Committee on November 5 of fruitful and proper way to commemorate the that year, events of October a quarter-century ago. Tracing the roots of the 1970s inflation brings We are here…to evaluate the moves of us to an earlier era. The Keynesian revolution of Chairman Volcker and his colleagues last the 1930s and its subsequent empirical applica- month, implying that some alternate poli- tion led many economists to accept the view that cies were feasible at that time.
Recommended publications
  • Paul H. Douglas Interviewer: John Newhouse Date of Interview: June 6, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C

    Paul H. Douglas Interviewer: John Newhouse Date of Interview: June 6, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C

    Paul H. Douglas, Oral History Interview – 6/6/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Paul H. Douglas Interviewer: John Newhouse Date of Interview: June 6, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 33 pages, 2 addenda Biographical Note Douglas, a U.S. Senator from Illinois from 1949 to 1967, discusses his memories of John F. Kennedy as a Senator and as President, including his work on labor and civil rights legislation, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the letter of agreement signed February 2, 1972, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
  • A Taylor Rule and the Greenspan Era

    A Taylor Rule and the Greenspan Era

    Economic Quarterly—Volume 93, Number 3—Summer 2007—Pages 229–250 A Taylor Rule and the Greenspan Era Yash P. Mehra and Brian D. Minton here is considerable interest in determining whether monetary policy actions taken by the Federal Reserve under Chairman Alan Greenspan T can be summarized by a Taylor rule. The original Taylor rule relates the federal funds rate target to two economic variables: lagged inflation and the output gap, with the actual federal funds rate completely adjusting to the target in each period (Taylor 1993).1 The later assumption of complete adjustment has often been interpreted as indicating the policy rule is “non-inertial,” or the Federal Reserve does not smooth interest rates. Inflation in the original Taylor rule is measured by the behavior of the GDP deflator and the output gap is the deviation of the log of real output from a linear trend. Taylor (1993) shows that from 1987 to 1992 policy actions did not differ significantly from prescriptions of this simple rule. Hence, according to the original Taylor rule, the Federal Reserve, at least during the early part of the Greenspan era, was backward looking, focused on headline inflation, and followed a non-inertial policy rule. Recent research, however, suggests a different picture of the Federal Re- serve under Chairman Greenspan. English, Nelson, and Sack (2002) present evidence that indicates policy actions during the Greenspan period are better explained by an “inertial” Taylor rule reflecting the presence of interest rate smoothing.2 Blinder and Reis (2005) state that the Greenspan Fed focused on We would like to thank Andreas Hornstein, Robert Hetzel, Roy Webb, and Nashat Moin for their comments.
  • Conduct of Monetary Policy, Report of the Federal Reserve Board, July 24

    Conduct of Monetary Policy, Report of the Federal Reserve Board, July 24

    CONDUCT OF MONETARY POLICY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 24, 1997 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking and Financial Services Serial No. 105-25 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 42-634 CC WASHINGTON : 1997 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-055923-5 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis HOUSE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa, Chairman BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida, Vice Chairman MARGE ROUKEMA, New Jersey HENRY B. GONZALEZ, Texas DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska JOHN J. LAFALCE, New York RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota RICK LAZIO, New York CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts MICHAEL N. CASTLE, Delaware PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania PETER T. KING, New York JOSEPH P. KENNEDY II, Massachusetts TOM CAMPBELL, California FLOYD H. FLAKE, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California MAXINE WATERS, California FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JACK METCALF, Washington LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois ROBERT W. NEY, Ohio LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California ROBERT L. EHRLICH JR., Maryland THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin BOB BARR, Georgia NYDIA M. VELAZQUEZ, New York JON D. FOX, Pennsylvania MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina SUE W. KELLY, New York MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York RON PAUL, Texas GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAVE WELDON, Florida KEN BENTSEN, Texas JIM RYUN, Kansas JESSE L. JACKSON JR., Illinois MERRILL COOK, Utah CYNTHIA A.
  • Chronology, 1963–89

    Chronology, 1963–89

    Chronology, 1963–89 This chronology covers key political and economic developments in the quarter century that saw the transformation of the Euromarkets into the world’s foremost financial markets. It also identifies milestones in the evolu- tion of Orion; transactions mentioned are those which were the first or the largest of their type or otherwise noteworthy. The tables and graphs present key financial and economic data of the era. Details of Orion’s financial his- tory are to be found in Appendix IV. Abbreviations: Chase (Chase Manhattan Bank), Royal (Royal Bank of Canada), NatPro (National Provincial Bank), Westminster (Westminster Bank), NatWest (National Westminster Bank), WestLB (Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale), Mitsubishi (Mitsubishi Bank) and Orion (for Orion Bank, Orion Termbank, Orion Royal Bank and subsidiaries). Under Orion financings: ‘loans’ are syndicated loans, NIFs, RUFs etc.; ‘bonds’ are public issues, private placements, FRNs, FRCDs and other secu- rities, lead managed, co-managed, managed or advised by Orion. New loan transactions and new bond transactions are intended to show the range of Orion’s client base and refer to clients not previously mentioned. The word ‘subsequently’ in brackets indicates subsequent transactions of the same type and for the same client. Transaction amounts expressed in US dollars some- times include non-dollar transactions, converted at the prevailing rates of exchange. 1963 Global events Feb Canadian Conservative government falls. Apr Lester Pearson Premier. Mar China and Pakistan settle border dispute. May Jomo Kenyatta Premier of Kenya. Organization of African Unity formed, after widespread decolonization. Jun Election of Pope Paul VI. Aug Test Ban Take Your Partners Treaty.
  • The Defense Program and the Economy Hearings

    The Defense Program and the Economy Hearings

    THE DEFENSE PROGRAM AND THE ECONOMY HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY OF THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS PART 1 OCTOBER 7, 13, 22, AND 29, 1981, AND DECEMBER 15, 1982 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 9-760 WASHINGTON:.1983 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to see. 5(a) of Public law 304, 79th Cong.) HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE HENRY S. REUSS, Wisconsin, Chairman ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa, Vice Chairman RICHARD BOLLING, Missouri WILLIAM V. ROTH, Ja., Delaware LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana JAMES ABDNOR, South Dakota. GILLIS W. LONG, Louisiana STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho PARREN J. MITCHELL, Maryland PAULA HAWKINS, Florida FREDERICK W. RICHMOND, New York' MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ohio LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas MARGARET M. HECKLER, Massachusetts WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin JOHN H. ROUSSELOT, California EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JAMES K. GALBRAITH, Executive Director BRucE R. BARTLETT, Deputy Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVEBNMENTAL PoLIor HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Chairman LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas, Vice Chairman RICHARD BOLLING, Missouri PAULA HAWKINS, Florida STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia 1 Representative Richmond resigned from the U.S. House of Representatives on Aug. 25, 1982, and Representative Augustus F. Hawkins, of California, was subsequently appointed to the committee on Sept. 23, 1982. CONTENTS WITNESSES AND STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, OCTOBEB 7, 1981 Reuss, Hon. Henry S., chairman of the Joint Economic Committee: Open- Page ing statement ------------------------------------------------- 1 Weidenbaum, Hon.
  • Mark W Olson: the Federal Open Market Committee and the Formation of Monetary Policy (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)

    Mark W Olson: the Federal Open Market Committee and the Formation of Monetary Policy (Central Bank Articles and Speeches)

    Mark W Olson: The Federal Open Market Committee and the formation of monetary policy Remarks by Mr Mark W Olson, Member of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, at the 26th Conference of the American Council on Gift Annuities, Orlando, Florida, 5 May 2004. * * * Thank you very much for inviting me here this evening. When my longtime friend Lance Jacobson extended this invitation more than a year ago, I readily accepted. Several months later, the 2004 calendar of Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings was released, and I discovered that this meeting would occur on the day following the Committee's May meeting. Because FOMC members observe a blackout on discussions of the economy for the week before and the week of the FOMC meetings, I prefer not to talk about current economic conditions. However, I can provide you with some insight into the way the FOMC functions and the impact of monetary policy on the U.S. and global economies. My former Federal Reserve colleague Laurence Meyer provided the blueprint for this presentation in a 1998 speech entitled “Come with Me to the FOMC.”1 That title, in turn, was borrowed from remarks given back in 1951. While my remarks are not identical in either style or substance, I have borrowed heavily from Larry's presentation, and you have the assurance that they have a long history. First, a comment or two on who we are. Nineteen policymakers participate in FOMC meetings, although at most only twelve vote at any one time. At times vacancies on the Board mean that the FOMC has fewer than twelve voting members.
  • Nomination of Ben S. Bernanke

    Nomination of Ben S. Bernanke

    S. HRG. 111–206 NOMINATION OF BEN S. BERNANKE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON THE NOMINATION OF BEN S. BERNANKE, OF NEW JERSEY, TO BE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM DECEMBER 3, 2009 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate05sh.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54–239 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut, Chairman TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama JACK REED, Rhode Island ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JIM BUNNING, Kentucky EVAN BAYH, Indiana MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BOB CORKER, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JIM DEMINT, South Carolina SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JON TESTER, Montana MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MARK R. WARNER, Virginia JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado EDWARD SILVERMAN, Staff Director WILLIAM D. DUHNKE, Republican Staff Director MARC JARSULIC, Chief Economist AMY FRIEND, Chief Counsel JULIE CHON, Senior Policy Adviser JOE HEPP, Professional Staff Member LISA FRUMIN, Legislative Assistant DEAN SHAHINIAN, Senior Counsel MARK F. OESTERLE, Republican Chief Counsel JEFF WRASE, Republican Chief Economist DAWN RATLIFF, Chief Clerk DEVIN HARTLEY, Hearing Clerk SHELVIN SIMMONS, IT Director JIM CROWELL, Editor (II) CONTENTS THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2009 Page Opening statement of Chairman Dodd .................................................................
  • National Academy of Arbitrators HISTORY COMMITTEE INTERVIEW Arthur Stark NAA President, 1977 Interviewed by Dennis Nolan May

    National Academy of Arbitrators HISTORY COMMITTEE INTERVIEW Arthur Stark NAA President, 1977 Interviewed by Dennis Nolan May

    National Academy of Arbitrators HISTORY COMMITTEE INTERVIEW Arthur Stark NAA President, 1977 Interviewed by Dennis Nolan May 29,1980 1 ARTHUR STARK PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ARBITRATORS 1977 TO 1978 INTERVIEWED BY DENNIS NOLAN AT THE CHICAGO HILTON AND TOWERS, CHICAGO, ILLINIOS MAY, 29, 1989 Dennis Nolan: This is Monday, May 29, in Chicago, Illinois, on the first day of the Annual Meeting of The National Academy of Arbitrators. I am Dennis Nolan and I am interviewing today Arthur Stark, who was president of The National Academy in 1977. Arthur, perhaps you could start us off with some information on your background. Could you tell me, first of all, where you were born, raised, educated. Arthur Stark: Well, I was born three score and ten years ago in New York City. I was raised in Manhattan, on the upper west side. I went to elementary and high school at something called the Ethical Cultures School in New York. We lived across the street from Columbia University on Broadway and 115th Street and I played on the Columbia tennis couirts. I went, are you interested 2 in college, at this point? Yes, you might as well, go on. Since Columbia was so close, I decided to go to College at the University of Chicago. The reason, principley, was that I was interested in labor relations even at that tender age. Looking around the country, there were two Universities that appealed to somebody like me. One was the University of Wisconsin, one was the University of Chicago and I chose Chicago.
  • Greenspan's Conundrum and the Fed's Ability to Affect Long-Term

    Greenspan's Conundrum and the Fed's Ability to Affect Long-Term

    Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series Greenspan’s Conundrum and the Fed’s Ability to Affect Long- Term Yields Daniel L. Thornton Working Paper 2012-036A http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-036.pdf September 2012 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS Research Division P.O. Box 442 St. Louis, MO 63166 ______________________________________________________________________________________ The views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve System, or the Board of Governors. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Papers (other than an acknowledgment that the writer has had access to unpublished material) should be cleared with the author or authors. Greenspan’s Conundrum and the Fed’s Ability to Affect Long-Term Yields Daniel L. Thornton Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Phone (314) 444-8582 FAX (314) 444-8731 Email Address: [email protected] August 2012 Abstract In February 2005 Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan noticed that the 10-year Treasury yields failed to increase despite a 150-basis-point increase in the federal funds rate as a “conundrum.” This paper shows that the connection between the 10-year yield and the federal funds rate was severed in the late 1980s, well in advance of Greenspan’s observation. The paper hypothesize that the change occurred because the Federal Open Market Committee switched from using the federal funds rate as an operating instrument to using it to implement monetary policy and presents evidence from a variety of sources supporting the hypothesis.
  • Overcoming the Zero Bound with Negative Interest Rate Policy

    Overcoming the Zero Bound with Negative Interest Rate Policy

    OVERCOMING THE ZERO BOUND WITH NEGATIVE INTEREST RATE POLICY Marvin Goodfriend Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School “Removing the Zero Lower Bound on Interest Rates” An Imperial College Business School, Brevan Howard Centre for Financial Analysis, CEPR, and Swiss National Bank Event London, 18 May 2015 1 Overcoming the Zero Bound with Negative Interest Rate Policy • Urgency of the problem • Evolution of monetary policy • Why the zero bound constraint matters • Mechanics of negative nominal interest rate policy • Elevated inflation target not the answer • Conclusion 2 Urgency of the Problem • Irving Fisher’s (1930, 1986) The Theory of Interest pointed out that if a commodity could be stored costlessly over time, then the rate of interest in units of that commodity could never fall below zero • A central bank that pays zero interest on reserves puts a lower bound on the nominal interbank rate of interest • The power of open market operations to lower short-term real interest rates to fight deflation or recession then is limited when nominal rates are already low on average—as is the case when inflation and the inflation premium are stabilized at a 2% inflation target 3 Urgency of the Problem (2) • Quantitative monetary policy appears to have been effective in averting deflation and stimulating demand with near zero interest rates in the US and the UK • But Japan did not exit the zero bound or deflation for two decades even with the help of quantitative policy • The US, the UK, and the Euro area have not yet exited near zero interest
  • Investment Insights

    Investment Insights

    CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICE Investment Insights AUGUST 2017 Matthew Diczok A Focus on the Fed Head of Fixed Income Strategy An Overview of the Federal Reserve System and a Look at Potential Personnel Changes SUMMARY After years of accommodative policy, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is on its path to policy normalization. The Fed forecasts another rate hike in late 2017, and three hikes in each of the next two years. The Fed also plans to taper reinvestments of Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, gradually reducing its balance sheet. The market thinks differently. Emboldened by inflation persistently below target, it expects the Fed to move significantly more slowly, with only one to three rate hikes between now and early 2019. One way or another, this discrepancy will be reconciled, with important implications for asset prices and yields. Against this backdrop, changes in personnel at the Fed are very important, and have been underappreciated by markets. The Fed has three open board seats, and the Chair and Vice Chair are both up for reappointment in 2018. If the administration appoints a Fed Chair and Vice Chair who are not currently governors, then there will be five new, permanent voting members who determine rate moves—almost half of the 12-member committee. This would be unprecedented in the modern era. Similar to its potential influence on the Supreme Court, this administration has the ability to set the tone of monetary policy for many years into the future. Most rumored candidates share philosophical leanings at odds with the current board; they are generally hawkish relative to current policy, favor rules-based decision-making over discretionary, and are unconvinced that successive rounds of quantitative easing were beneficial.
  • Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC

    Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC

    Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC MODELING LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH Robert W. Arnold Congressional Budget Office Washington, D.C. 20515 [email protected] June 2003 2003-4 Technical papers in this series are preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. These papers are not subject to CBO’s formal review and editing processes. The analysis and conclusions expressed in them are those of the author and should not be interpreted as those of the Congressional Budget Office. References in publications should be cleared with the author. Papers in this series can be obtained from www.cbo.gov. Abstract This paper reviews the recent empirical literature on long-run growth to determine what factors influence growth in total factor productivity (TFP) and whether there are any channels of influence that should be added to standard models of long-run growth. Factors affecting productivity fall into three general categories: physical capital, human capital, and innovation (including other factors that might influence TFP growth). Recent empirical evidence provides little support for the idea that there are extra-normal returns to physical capital accumulation, nor is there solid justification for adding a separate channel of influence from capital to TFP growth. The paper finds evidence that human capital—as distinct from labor hours worked—is an important factor for growth but also that there is not yet a consensus about exactly how it should enter the model. Some argue that human capital should enter as a factor of production, while others argue that it merely spurs innovation. The forces governing TFP growth are not well understood, but there is evidence that R&D spending is a significant contributor and that its benefit to society may exceed its benefit to the company doing the spending—that is, it is a source of spillovers.