Investment Insights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investment Insights CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICE Investment Insights AUGUST 2017 Matthew Diczok A Focus on the Fed Head of Fixed Income Strategy An Overview of the Federal Reserve System and a Look at Potential Personnel Changes SUMMARY After years of accommodative policy, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is on its path to policy normalization. The Fed forecasts another rate hike in late 2017, and three hikes in each of the next two years. The Fed also plans to taper reinvestments of Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, gradually reducing its balance sheet. The market thinks differently. Emboldened by inflation persistently below target, it expects the Fed to move significantly more slowly, with only one to three rate hikes between now and early 2019. One way or another, this discrepancy will be reconciled, with important implications for asset prices and yields. Against this backdrop, changes in personnel at the Fed are very important, and have been underappreciated by markets. The Fed has three open board seats, and the Chair and Vice Chair are both up for reappointment in 2018. If the administration appoints a Fed Chair and Vice Chair who are not currently governors, then there will be five new, permanent voting members who determine rate moves—almost half of the 12-member committee. This would be unprecedented in the modern era. Similar to its potential influence on the Supreme Court, this administration has the ability to set the tone of monetary policy for many years into the future. Most rumored candidates share philosophical leanings at odds with the current board; they are generally hawkish relative to current policy, favor rules-based decision-making over discretionary, and are unconvinced that successive rounds of quantitative easing were beneficial. Given the leanings of these potential candidates, it is entirely possible that the administration instead will choose as Fed Chair a businessperson without formal economic training. While appointing a pro-business, flexible moderate may be better aligned with the administration’s agenda, appointing a non-economist—the first chosen in forty years—may be a concern for the markets. In this piece, we cover: • the Fed’s responsibilities and organizational structure; • key current issues affecting monetary policy; and • potential candidates for Fed vacancies and their likely impact. Merrill Lynch Wealth Management makes available products and services offered by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S), a registered broker-dealer and Member SIPC, and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation (BofA Corp.). Investment products: Are Not FDIC Insured Are Not Bank Guaranteed May Lose Value © 2017 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. Overview of the Federal Reserve System1 Twelve Federal Reserve Banks The Fed is the U.S. central bank responsible for both monetary The twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks act as the policy and financial stability. It is tasked by Congress with a operating arms of the Fed. Each Reserve Bank operates within “dual mandate” – maximum employment and stable prices. The its own “district” to gather local economic intelligence to help Fed has three key entities: improve the Fed’s decision-making. The districts are Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, • Federal Reserve Board of Governors; St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco. • 12 Federal Reserve Banks; and The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee • Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) sets See Exhibit 1 for a summary of the Fed’s structure. monetary policy, controlling the supply and cost of money to achieve its economic objectives. It uses the Federal Funds rate Federal Reserve Board of Governors as its main policy tool. The FOMC has twelve voting members The Board is the Fed’s governing body, responsible for when fully staffed: guiding the bank’s operations. It has seven members, called • The Board of Governors (seven members, but currently only “Governors.” Each is nominated by the President and confirmed four due to vacancies); by the Senate to a single term of 14 years. The Chair and Vice Chair are appointed and confirmed to a term of four years, • The President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York but can be reappointed and must either be existing board (currently William Dudley); and members or simultaneously appointed to the board. There are • Four out of 11 non-New York Reserve Bank Presidents on a currently three board vacancies. one-year, rotating basis. Chair Janet Yellen’s first term as Fed Chair ends February 3, By tradition, the FOMC elects the Chair of the Board of 2018. Vice Chair Stanley Fischer’s first term ends on June 12, Governors as Chair of the FOMC, and President of the Federal 2018. Both are eligible for reappointment. In theory, the Chair Reserve Bank of New York to be Vice Chair of the FOMC. or Vice Chair can stay on as Governor, although this rarely While only the 12 FOMC members actually vote, all 12 Reserve occurs in practice. Bank presidents participate in FOMC meetings. (The New York Fed is the only regional bank with a permanent vote.) Exhibit 1: Structure of the Fed Board of Govenors (7) FOMC (12) Federal Reserve Banks (12) 1. Janet Yellen (Chair)* Board of Governors 1. New York 2. Stanley Fischer (Vice Chair)* 1. Janet Yellen (Chair)* 2. Boston 3. Jerome Powell 2. Stanley Fischer* 3. Philadelphia 4. Lael Brainard 3. Jerome Powell 4. Cleveland 5. Open 4. Lael Brainard 5. Richmond 6. Open 5. Open 6. Atlanta 7. Open 6. Open 7. Chicago 7. Open 8. St. Louis Bank of NY President 9. Minneapolis 8. William Dudley (Vice Chair) 10. Kansas City 11. Dallas Four of the 11 non-NY Bank Presidents (One-year rotation as voting FOMC member) 12. San Francisco 9. Chicago (Charles Evans) 10. Dallas (Robert Kaplan) 11. Philadelphia (Patrick Harker) 12. Minneapolis (Neel Kashkari) Source: Federal Reserve and Chief Investment Office. * = eligible for reappointment. 1 Information of the Federal Reserve from www.federalreserve.gov/ CIO REPORTS • Investment Insights 2 CIO REPORTS • Investment Insights CIO REPORTS •Investment not hike as anticipated. not hikeasanticipated. willlikely theFed willcontinuetobe, andthattherefore, years, for five concerned thatsub-trendinflationhasbeenpersistent 2%target.Themarketis theFed’s gradually increasetowards itwill – inflationisalaggingindicatorandbelieves seesthisdisinflationastransitory interpretations. TheFed differing this discrepancy(Exhibit2),andtherearetwo beginning of2019.Thetrendininflationbestillustrates onlyonemore hikewilloccurthroughthe and believes chance ofanotherhikein2017atapproximately50percent, isskepticalandcurrentlyputsthe The market,however, in both2018and2019. Fundstargetrateoncemorein2017,andthreetimes the Fed TheFOMCanticipatesraising balance sheetstartingthisyear. timesandexpectstoshrinkits Fundstargetratefour Fed –inDecember2015.Ithasraisedthe less accommodative –becoming The FOMCstartedtheprocessof“normalization” July 19. from $750billioninDecember2007to$4.2trillion,asof securitiesholdings easing,”increasingtheFed’s “quantitative toas amounts ofsecuritiesinprogramscolloquiallyreferred hasalsopurchased significant TheFed years. seven there for to0%-0.25%inDecember2008, andleft rate waslowered Funds theFed accommodative; Monetary policyhasbeenvery theFOMC Current IssuesFacing Source: BloombergasofJuly17,2017. Inflation (%) andMarkets theFed to aDisconnectBetween Exhibit 2: 0.0 0 1.0 1 2.0 2 3.0 . 5 5 5 2/1/2006 8/1/2006 2/1/2007 8/1/2007 Views onDisinflationareLeading Differing 2/1/2008 Core CPI 8/1/2008 2/1/2009 Fed target 8/1/2009 2/1/2010 8/1/2010 2/1/2011 8/1/2011 2/1/2012 8/1/2012 2/1/2013 8/1/2013 Core PCE 2/1/2014 8/1/2014 2/1/2015 8/1/2015 2/1/2016 8/1/2016 2/1/2017 those moreinclinedtowait. as higher ratessoonerinthecurrentenvironment,anddoves describehawks asparticipantsmorelikelytofavor informally would leanings dependingontheparticularsituation.We hawkishordovish conditions, andasinglemembermayhave anysetofinitial the correctcourseofmonetarypolicyfor thereisaspectrumofbeliefs – islessrelevant.Inreality, inflationgenerally lower withhawks favoring employment, for higher willingtotradehigherinflation divide –doves a statedinflationtarget(2%),sotheclassicalhawk-dove has now (Exhibit 3),butthosetermsareambiguous.TheFed or“hawks” FOMC membersareoftencharacterizedas“doves” ChangestotheBoardofGovernors Potential compositiontochangemoregradually. the Fed’s expect allthevacanciestobefilledinshortorderandexpects itmayalsobethatthemarketdoesnot may becomplacency, The marketdoesnotseemtoregisterthisrisk;while monetary policyandultimatelythetrajectoryofeconomy. of greatlyinfluencethestance confirmation –cantherefore almost halfthecommittee.ThePresident–withSenate’s voting members on theFOMC, newpermanent total offive a could changein2018.Thisissignificant;therebe Chair hasthreeopenvacanciesandtheChairVice Fed thefactthat of assetclassreturns.Thisisexacerbatedby willbeanimportant driver thesedisparateviewsresolve How of the other two openings. of theothertwo one hasbeenreportedtobeacandidatefor June ofthisyear, seats. MarvinGoodfriend,firstmentionedinthebeginning of for anyofthethreeopenboard is theonlyconfirmednominee filled.He legislationbutnever Dodd-Frank position createdby ChairofBankSupervision,a Quarles willbenominatedasVice The WhiteHouseconfirmedonJuly10,2017,thatRandal Governors Fed Potential 3 Exhibit 3: FOMC Members - Characterization of Doves and Hawks Powell Governors Brainard Yellen Fischer
Recommended publications
  • Nominations of Joseph Otting and Randal Quarles Hearing Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs United States Senate
    S. HRG. 115–133 NOMINATIONS OF JOSEPH OTTING AND RANDAL QUARLES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON THE NOMINATIONS OF: JOSEPH OTTING, OF NEVADA, TO BE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY RANDAL QUARLES, OF COLORADO, TO BE A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, AND VICE CHAIRMAN FOR SUPERVISION, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM JULY 27, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.govinfo.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–282 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:17 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 046629 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\28282.TXT SHERYL COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS MIKE CRAPO, Idaho, Chairman RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama SHERROD BROWN, Ohio BOB CORKER, Tennessee JACK REED, Rhode Island PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DEAN HELLER, Nevada JON TESTER, Montana TIM SCOTT, South Carolina MARK R. WARNER, Virginia BEN SASSE, Nebraska ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts TOM COTTON, Arkansas HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota MIKE ROUNDS, South Dakota JOE DONNELLY, Indiana DAVID PERDUE, Georgia BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii THOM
    [Show full text]
  • IFFCBANO Symposium: Keeping Trade Moving
    IFFCBANO Symposium: Keeping Trade Moving Adrienne C. Slack Regional Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta - New Orleans Branch The views expressed here are my own, and not necessarily those of the Atlanta Fed or the Federal Reserve System. The Fed’s Dual Mandate • The Fed is pursuing two objectives as given to us by Congress— maximum employment and price stability. • The maximum level of employment is largely determined by nonmonetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the job market, although a stronger economy does help with job creation. • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has chosen an inflation target of two percent per year over the medium term as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures. 2 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Randal Quarles Jerome H. Powell Richard H. Clarida Lael Brainard Vice Chair for Chair Vice Chair Supervision Vacant Michelle W. Bowman Vacant 3 The Federal Reserve Bank Presidents Loretta Mester Charles Evans Neel Kashkari Patrick Harker Eric Rosengren Cleveland Chicago Minneapolis Philadelphia Boston 4th District 7th District 9th District 3rd District 1st District John Williams New York 2nd District Tom Barkin Richmond 5th District Mary Daly San Francisco Esther George Raphael Bostic Robert Kaplan James Bullard 12th District Kansas City Atlanta 10th District Dallas St. Louis 6th District 11th District 8th District 4 The Sixth District Information Flow Public Sixth Policy District Business Sixth FOMC District Research Sixth Atlanta District Board of President Directors 6 Summary of the Economic Environment: The May 2019 FOMC Policy Statement • Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that the labor market remains strong and that economic activity rose at a solid rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) (Ed.) Periodical Part NBER Reporter Online, Volume 2011 NBER Reporter Online Provided in Cooperation with: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Mass. Suggested Citation: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) (Ed.) (2011) : NBER Reporter Online, Volume 2011, NBER Reporter Online, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/61994 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences),
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Spillovers of Balance Sheet Normalization
    For release on delivery 12:30 p.m. EDT July 11, 2017 Cross-Border Spillovers of Balance Sheet Normalization Remarks by Lael Brainard Member Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at “Normalizing Central Banks’ Balance Sheets: What Is the New Normal?” a conference sponsored by Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York New York, New York July 11, 2017 When the central banks in many advanced economies embarked on unconventional monetary policy, it raised concerns that there might be differences in the cross-border transmission of unconventional relative to conventional monetary policy.1 These concerns were sufficient to warrant a special Group of Seven (G-7) statement in 2013 establishing ground rules to address possible exchange rate effects of the changing composition of monetary policy.2 Today the world confronts similar questions in reverse. In the United States, in my assessment, normalization of the federal funds rate is now well under way, and the Federal Reserve is advancing plans to allow the balance sheet to run off at a gradual and predictable pace. And for the first time in many years, the global economy is experiencing synchronous growth, and authorities in the euro area and the United Kingdom are beginning to discuss the time when the need for monetary accommodation will diminish. Unlike in previous tightening cycles, many central banks currently have two tools for removing accommodation. They can therefore pursue alternative normalization strategies--first seeking to guide policy rates higher before initiating balance sheet runoff, as in the United States, or instead starting to shrink the balance sheet before initiating a 1 I am grateful to John Ammer, Bastian von Beschwitz, Christopher Erceg, Matteo Iacoviello, and John Roberts for their assistance in preparing this text.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman Jay Clayton, February 1, 2018 to February 28, 2018
    Chairman Jay Clayton Public Calendar February 1, 2018 to February 28, 2018 Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:00 am Meeting with staff 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:00 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 12:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner 1:00 pm Meeting with Silicon Valley Bank, including: Greg Becker, CEO, and Michael Zuckert, General Counsel; and Kara Calvert, Partner, Franklin Square Group 2:00 pm Closed Commission Meeting 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 3:30 pm Meeting with staff Friday, February 2, 2018 8:30 am Phone call with Senator Sherrod Brown 9:00 am Meeting with the Capital Market Authority (CMA) of Saudi Arabia, including: Ms. Mona Al-Nemer, Manager, Investment Products Development Department; and Ms. Hanan Al-Shehri, Officer, Investment Products Development Department 11:30 am Speaking engagement at the Mid-Atlantic Security Traders Association’s 2018 Winter Conference Monday, February 5, 2018 11:00 am Meeting with Commissioner 12:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:00 pm Meeting with Greg Gilman, President, National Treasury Employees Union Chapter 293 4:00 pm Meeting with Senator Heidi Heitkamp 6:30 pm Meeting with Tom Ayres, Department of the Air Force General Counsel Nominee Tuesday, February 6, 2018 8:30 am Phone call with Jerome Powell, Governor, Federal Reserve Board 10:00 am Hearing before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 2:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner 4:45 pm Meeting with Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • Jelena Mcwilliams-FDIC
    www-scannedretina.com Jelena McWilliams-FDIC Jelena McWilliams-FDIC Voice of the American Sovereign (VOAS) The lawless Municipal Government operated by the "US CONGRESS" Washington, D.C., The smoking gun; do you get it? John Murtha – Impostor committed Treason – Time to sue his estate… Trust through Transparency - Jelena McWilliams - FDIC Chair Theft through Deception - Arnie Rosner - American sovereign, a Californian — and not a US Citizen via the fraudulent 14th Amendment. Sovereignty! TRUMP – THE AMERICAN SOVEREIGNS RULE AMERICA! All rights reserved - Without recourse - 1 of 120 - [email protected] - 714-964-4056 www-scannedretina.com Jelena McWilliams-FDIC 1.1. The FDIC responds - the bank you referenced is under the direct supervision of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. From: FDIC NoReply <[email protected]> Subject: FDIC Reply - 01003075 Date: April 29, 2019 at 6:36:46 AM PDT To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] April 29, 2019 Ref. No.: 01003075 Re: MUFG Union Bank, National Association, San Francisco, CA Dear Arnold Beryl Rosner: Thank you for your correspondence, which was received by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC's mission is to ensure the stability of and public confidence in the nation's financial system. To achieve this goal, the FDIC has insured deposits and promoted safe and sound banking practices since 1933. We are responsible for supervising state- chartered, FDIC-insured institutions that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Based on our review of your correspondence, the bank you referenced is under the direct supervision of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Inflation Really Transitory?
    Is Inflation Really Transitory? By Eric Grover National Review August 17, 2021 Financial-market indicators point to a persistent uptick in inflation. DESPITE a few recent hints of unease, the Fed still maintains that the current surge in inflation is “transitory.” That seems optimistic: The central bank has been stoking inflation and is stubbornly blind to the danger of getting more than it bargained for, of letting loose what Nobel Prize– winning economist Friedrich Hayek described as the “tiger.” Fed chairman Paul Volcker caged inflation after it’d crested at 13.5 percent in 1980. Since then, however, the Fed, politicians, consumers, and producers have become complacent about the risk that it might escape again. The current cocktail of money-printing, massive deficit spending, pandemic- related supply-chain disruptions, and pent-up demand coming out of COVID-19 hibernation means inflation ahead — and not just for the short term. The outlook is only made worse by the hit to the supply side that will come from increased regulation and taxes, not to speak of the boost to energy costs that will flow from the administration’s hostility to fossil fuels. The Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion in August 2008 to a whopping $8.2 trillion in mid July 2021. However, by paying banks interest to park excess reserves held at the Fed, the central bank has managed to keep new dollars from entering the economy in the form of credit, thereby holding down inflation. Now, printed money is showing up in consumption and price data, and the longer the “transitory” surge endures, the more difficult it will be to contain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Climate Change: a First Fed Conference Galina B
    FRBSF Economic Letter 2019-31 | December 16, 2019 | Research from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco The Economics of Climate Change: A First Fed Conference Galina B. Hale, Òscar Jordà, and Glenn D. Rudebusch To better understand the implications of climate change for the financial sector and the broader economy, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco recently hosted a conference on the economics of climate change to gather and debate the latest analyses from universities and policy institutions, nationally and abroad. It was the first Fed-sponsored conference devoted to investigating the economic and financial consequences and risks arising from climate change and potential policy responses. The scientific community around the world has reached a broad consensus on the ongoing climate change caused by human activities. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014), stated, “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and the sea level has risen” (p. 40). Scientists also attribute more frequent and extreme storms, floods, droughts, and heat waves to these adverse developments (U.S. Global Change Research Program 2018, hereafter USGCRP). This climate change will have sweeping effects on our economy and financial system (Network for Greening the Financial System 2018, hereafter NGFS; USGCRP 2018). Climate-related shifts in the physical environment can slow economic growth, increase volatility, and depreciate the value of business and household assets and property. Avoiding further climate change will involve a substantial transformation of the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Zero Bound with Negative Interest Rate Policy
    OVERCOMING THE ZERO BOUND WITH NEGATIVE INTEREST RATE POLICY Marvin Goodfriend Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School “Removing the Zero Lower Bound on Interest Rates” An Imperial College Business School, Brevan Howard Centre for Financial Analysis, CEPR, and Swiss National Bank Event London, 18 May 2015 1 Overcoming the Zero Bound with Negative Interest Rate Policy • Urgency of the problem • Evolution of monetary policy • Why the zero bound constraint matters • Mechanics of negative nominal interest rate policy • Elevated inflation target not the answer • Conclusion 2 Urgency of the Problem • Irving Fisher’s (1930, 1986) The Theory of Interest pointed out that if a commodity could be stored costlessly over time, then the rate of interest in units of that commodity could never fall below zero • A central bank that pays zero interest on reserves puts a lower bound on the nominal interbank rate of interest • The power of open market operations to lower short-term real interest rates to fight deflation or recession then is limited when nominal rates are already low on average—as is the case when inflation and the inflation premium are stabilized at a 2% inflation target 3 Urgency of the Problem (2) • Quantitative monetary policy appears to have been effective in averting deflation and stimulating demand with near zero interest rates in the US and the UK • But Japan did not exit the zero bound or deflation for two decades even with the help of quantitative policy • The US, the UK, and the Euro area have not yet exited near zero interest
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman Jay Clayton, October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020
    Chairman Jay Clayton Public Calendar October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020 Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:00 am Phone call with Robert Ophele, Chairman, French Financial Markets Authority 10:15 am Speaking engagement, Rosenblatt Securities Global Exchange Leader Conference 11:30 am Speaking engagement, Webinar “Two Sides of the American Coin” with Acting Comptroller of the Currency Brian Brooks 1:00 pm Meeting with staff 2:30 pm Meeting with staff 3:00 pm Meeting with staff 3:30 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with staff Monday, October 5, 2020 7:00 am Financial Stability Board (FSB) Meeting 10:00 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 11:30 am Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee (FIMSAC) Meeting 1:00 am Town Hall meeting with SEC employees 2:30 pm FIMSAC Meeting 4:15 pm Phone call with Publish What You Pay, including: Kathleen Brophy, Director; Zorka Milin, Senior Legal Advisor, Global Witness; Joseph Kraus, Transparency & Accountability Policy Director; Isabel Munilla, Extractive Industries Transparency Policy Lead, Oxfam America; and Michelle Harrison, Staff Attorney, Earthrights International 4:30 pm Phone call with Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), including: Ken Bentsen, Chief Executive Officer; Joe Seidel, Chief Operating Officer; Ira Hammerman, General Counsel; Tom Price, Managing Director, Operations Technology; Aseel Rabie, Associate General Counsel; and Melissa MacGregor, Associate General Counsel 5:00 pm Phone call with Heath Tarbert, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading
    [Show full text]
  • Interview of Stanley Fischer by Olivier Blanchard
    UBRARIBS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Library Consortium IVIember Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/interviewofstanlOOblan 2 DEWEY HB31 .M415 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics Working Paper Series Interview of Stanley Fischer By Olivier Blanchard Working Paper 05-1 April 1 9, 2005 Room E52-251 50 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 021 42 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Networl< Paper Collection at http://ssrn.com/abstract=707821 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY APR 2 6 2005 LIBRARIES Interview of Stanley Fischer, by Olivier Blanchard.i Abstract Stanley Fischer is a macroeconomist par excellence. After three careers, the first in academia at Chicago, and at MIT, the second at the World Bank and at the International Monetary Fund, the third in the private sector at Citigroup, he is starting a fourth, as the head of the Central Bank of Israel. This interview, to be published in Macroeconomic Dynamics, took place in April 2004, before the start of his fourth career. This interview took place long before Stan had any idea he would become Governor of the Bank of Israel, a position he took up in May 2005. We have not changed the text to reflect this latest stage. Introduction. The interview took place in April 2004 in my office at the Russell Sage Foundation in New York City, where I was spending a sabbatical year. We completed it while running together in Central Park during the following weeks. Our meeting at Russell Sage was just like the many meetings we have had over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • How the World Achieved Partial Consensus on Monetary Policy1
    How the World Achieved Partial Consensus on Monetary Policy1 James Bullard President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Shadow Open Market Committee Meeting Current Monetary Policy: The Influence of Marvin Goodfriend New York, N.Y. March 6, 2020 In 2007, Marvin Goodfriend published a paper titled “How the World Achieved Consensus on Monetary Policy” in the Journal of Economic Perspectives. It is an excellent summary of the sequence of economic ideas influencing and eventually dominating actual monetary policy from Lucas (1972) up to the eve of the global financial crisis. Goodfriend’s explanations and summaries are so lucid, and his examples and thinking so familiar to me that in rereading the article I had the sensation that my life was flashing before my eyes. In the article, Goodfriend builds up the key idea in central banking of the last 50 years—namely, successful monetary policy requires a credible commitment on the part of the central bank to careful, systematic future policy choices. At the end of the article, he allows for some unfinished business and some open issues, among them the question of why credible central banks may end up with inflation that is too low when compared to an intended target. In retrospect, the “World Consensus” article appears a bit triumphal and somewhat premature. The events since its publication seem to suggest that the consensus that appeared to exist at that moment has its own problems. As we meet here today, many central banks have consistently missed their stated inflation targets to the low side for many years.
    [Show full text]