Heart of Europe on the Periphery –

No. 01 ASPEN.REVIEW 2020 CENTRAL EUROPE COVER STORIES Colin Crouch, Vít Dostál, Csaba G. Kiss, Pavol Kosnáč, Kacper Szulecki POLITICS Jeffrey Gedmin ECONOMY Hanna Szymborska CULTURE Edit Zgut INTERVIEW David Alandete 9 771805 679005 No. 01/2020 — Heart of Europe on the Periphery Heart of Europe on the Periphery Peripherality– in Today’s Europe About Aspen Aspen Review Central Europe quarterly presents current issues to the public in the Aspenian way by adopting unusual approaches and unique viewpoints, by publishing analyses, interviews and commentaries by world-renowned professionals as well as Central European journalists and scholars. The Aspen Review is published by the Aspen Institute CE. Aspen Institute Central Europe is a partner of the global Aspen net- work and serves as an independent platform where political, business, and non-profit leaders, as well as personalities from art, media, sports and sci- ence, can interact. The Institute facilitates interdisciplinary, regional cooperation, and supports young leaders in their development. The core of the Institute’s activities focuses on leadership seminars, expert meetings, and public conferences, all of which are held in a neutral manner to encourage open debate in three areas: — Leadership Program offers educational and networking projects for outstanding young Central European professionals. Aspen Young Leaders Program brings together emerging and experienced leaders for four days of workshops, debates, and networking activities. — Policy Program enables expert discussions that support strategic thinking and an interdisciplinary approach in topics such as digital agenda, cities’ development and creative placemaking, art & business, education, as well as transatlantic and Visegrad cooperation. — Public Program aspires to present challenging ideas at public events, such as the Aspen Annual Conference that convenes high-profile guests from all over the world to discuss current affairs, and via Aspen Review Central Europe. Heart of Europe on the Periphery No. 01 2020 ASPEN.REVIEW CONTENTS 04 FOREWORD The Heart Jiří Schneider 06 EDITORIAL The Far West Aleksander Kaczorowski 08 Peripherality in Today’s Europe Colin Crouch 16 Illiberal Remittances. Is Mass Migration and the Demise of the Myth of the West Fueling Populism in CEE? Kacper Szulecki 25 Farewell to Periphery Vít Dostál 30 INTERVIEW with Csaba G. Kiss: The Center of Europe Has an Inferiority Complex Zbigniew Rokita 36 AY L The Rise of Paramilitaries in Central and Eastern Europe Pavol Kosnáč 43 INTERVIEW with David Alandete: The Kremlin Connection Jakub Dymek 49 COMMENT It’s Time For Us To Reclaim Our Visegrad! Luboš Palata 53 INTERVIEW with Jeffrey Gedmin: Less World, More America Tomáš Klvaňa 58 Moscow Protests and their Consequences Ivan Preobrazhensky 63 The City and the Myth: Making Sense of the Lviv ‘Nationalist’ Image Mykola Riabchuk 78 Are Wealth Taxes the Panacea for the Ills of Capitalism? Hanna Szymborska 83 INTERVIEW with Ivan Mikloš: Every Eighteen Years a Real Estate Bubble is Popped and Followed by an Economic Crisis Robert Schuster 88 5G: Estonia Picks National Security over Technology Ahto Lobjakas 93 Perverted Democracies Edit Zgut 99 Merit is Privilege Benjamin Cunningham 106 Growth on the European Periphery Przemysław Wielgosz ASPEN.REVIEW FOREWORD Dear Readers, In recent decades, Central Europe has returned politically and eco- nomically to Europe. Nevertheless, one can sense a growing uneasiness among part of the political class which feels that it has not been fully accept- ed in the center of EU decision-making. The first seeds of an illiberal mood in countries joining the club grew with the acceptance of the superiority of Western institutions. This raises several questions. Is a center-periphery polarity inevitable in the institutional setting of European integration? Can every nation be equally represented in its institutions regardless of its size and geographical location? What is wrong about being at the periphery? It could be a disadvantage in hierarchical systems, but not necessar- ily in networks. The center and periphery can be mutually complementary, but are more frequently in tension. Eventually one can turn the perspective upside down—as Viktor Orbán did in 2014—and claim that a country in a periphery could become morally superior to a decadent center. In her analysis, Edit Zgut identified “an impatience with liberal con- straints on the government with checks and balances viewed as obstacles of getting things done for the people” as a major symptom of illiberal backslid- ing. She rightly points out, however, the other side of the coin: “a political state capture and systemic corruption is partly financed by the EU through- out generous subsidies”. 04 Aspen.Review/TheHeart According to Vít Dostál, dealing with the fringe of Europe has become both a moral and political issue because of notions such as “new avant-gar- de”, or “cultural counter revolution”. By nurturing “the identities of the lagging periphery” and by failing to “convince Western Europeans about the merit of European integration”, Central Europeans could find themselves “in the position of periphery unwanted, and perhaps forgotten again.“ Csaba G. Kiss also views peripherality through economic and moral lenses and de- scribes it in terms of an inferiority complex. Kacper Szulecki provides unique insight into internal EU migration, its motivations and dynamism. Central European diasporas living in Western and Northern Europe, channeled back home their disenchantment with host countries, migration, and more broadly with Europe and ‘the West’ He men- tions the testimony of Poland’s Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki who de- scribed his disappointment with previous encounters with Western Europe as a successful CEO in financial business. High hopes for recognition met with disinterest. I suspect more Central Europeans share such an experience. In the end, there is a broader question as to whether the whole of Europe will not become a periphery in global terms. Will the European Union be able to make effective political decisions in order to remain geo- politically relevant? Or will Europe find itself in the position of a powerless object of competition between the United States and the People‘s Republic of China? JIŘÍ SCHNEIDER Executive Director, Aspen Institute CE 05 ASPEN.REVIEW EDITORIAL The Far West If we look at what we call the European continent from the perspective of the people of China, India or Japan, we will see the westernmost cape of Eurasia—the Eurasian Far West. This part of the world is relatively small, but surprisingly diverse in terms of terrain, coastline, climate and the genetic pool of the natives, who are almost without exception descendants of vis- itors from the Middle East, the Caspian steppes or Central Asia—Greeks, Romans, Celts, Goths, Slavs and other nomads—and today of migrants from virtually all over the world. For some reason, still baffling the wisest scholars and flaunting all probabilities, this remote corner has managed to establish communication with the entire globe, reaching the farthest corners of the world and civiliza- tion, subjugating them for several centuries and drawing huge profits from it. Let us imagine nineteenth-century Japan colonizing most of Asia, Africa, North America, and Australia to boot, and its fleet dominating three oceans. This is what England succeeded in doing. Let us imagine jealous Korea es- tablishing its own outposts in North America, and proud Thailand guarding 06 Aspen.Review/TheFarWest its previously conquered possessions in South America. Let us imagine that the language of modern Brazil is not Portuguese, but Khmer. And that the lingua franca of the peoples of North Africa is the language of the ancient conquerors, let’s say Philippine. Something equally unbelievable was achieved in modern times by several European nations. Even more remarkable is the fact that after centuries of bloody conflicts and two world wars, Europeans created a common political organism and despite obvious adversities still want to de- velop it. Today, the European Union is the only real measure of European values; they are worth as much as the common European house that we are going to build. In this context, the celebrated pronouncement by French President Emmanuel Macron, critical of NATO, is a call for a discussion that has been postponed for too long. Macron presented his own vision of Europe, full of specific details. The EU must reinvent itself: stop relying on Americans, agree on a common approach to Russia, build European armed forces, link the distribution of funds with respecting rule of law, and revise the policy of EU enlargement (in short: grant rights and money to candidates for mem- bership in installments, for good behavior, so as not to repeat the mistakes made in relation to the countries of Eastern Europe). In fact, the French leader called on the leaders of the EU Member States to join forces in the Eurasian game, probably the most important geopolitical game of the twenty first century. The leaders of Central European countries, including Germany, will have to quickly find an answer to this appeal. ALEKSANDER KACZOROWSKI Editor in Chief Aspen Review Central Europe 07 E U R O P 08 Aspen.Review/ThePeriphery E ASPEN.REVIEW Peripherality COLIN CROUCH COVER STORY PERIPHERY CLUSTERING in Today’s ICT SECTOR U Europe In contrast with clustering in traditional manufacturing industries, that in advanced manufacturing and services tends to prefer capital cities and others with attractive and convenient environments. The cumulative effect of this is to privilege a relatively small number of cities and regions in a restricted number of parts of Europe. Important forces are driving differences between cities, regions, whole countries and eventually entire parts of Europe, making for ever bigger con- trasts between thea north-western core and southern and eastern peripher- ies. One of the pressures behind this macro-level trend is a very micro-level factor: firms in many branches of the economy find advantages in clustering, in locating themselves geographically near to others in the same or relat- ed fields.

Load more