Preliminary Wetlands Assessment in the Abbay River Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Wetlands Assessment in the Abbay River Basin The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Abbay Basin Authority Wetlands Ecosystems Coverage,Status and Threats in the Abbay River Basin Conducted By: Getnet Hunegnaw Habib Mengesha Alemante Aimro Biazin Ferede Abbay Basin Authority December, 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. v Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ vii Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives of the assessment .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Scope of the assessment ................................................................................................. 3 2. Literature Review ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Wetlands in the world ........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Wetlands in Ethiopia ......................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Wetlands in the Abbay Basin ........................................................................................... 8 2.4 Classification of wetlands ............................................................................................... 10 2.5 Functions of wetlands ..................................................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Wetland economic values ..................................................................................................... 13 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Description of Assessment Areas ................................................................................. 15 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis Methods ........................................................................ 17 4. Findings of the Assessment and Discussion ..................................................................... 17 4.1 Wetlands Distribution in the Abbay Basin ................................................................ 17 4.2 Uses of wetlands in the Abbay River Basin ................................................................ 23 4.2.1 Fisheries ........................................................................................................................ 24 4.2.2 Food supply ................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.4 Material supply .............................................................................................................. 26 4.2.5 Water supply ................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.6 Urban wastewater and Surface runoff treatment ................................................... 28 4.3 Bird Species Diversity ..................................................................................................... 28 4.4 Plant Species Diversity ................................................................................................... 29 ii 4.5 Current wetlandmanagementsystems……………………………………………….30 4.6 Threats of Wetlands ........................................................................................................ 30 4.7 Legal Frameworks ........................................................................................................... 31 4.8 Strategic issues for future wetland management ....................................................... 32 5. Conclusion and Recommendations .................................................................................... 33 5.1 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 33 5.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 35 References .................................................................................................................................. 37 Annexes ....................................................................................................................................... 41 Annex I. Assessment Questionnaires ................................................................................ 41 Annex II. Bird Species .......................................................................................................... 45 Annex III. Plant Species ........................................................................................................ 46 Annex IV. Wild Animals ........................................................................................................ 49 Annex V. Reptiles .................................................................................................................. 49 Annex VI. Fishes ................................................................................................................... 49 Annex VII. Lists of wetlands found in the Tana sub basin ............................................... 50 Annex VIII. Lists of wetlands found in the Debub Gojjam sub basin ............................ 59 Annex IX. Lists of wetlands found in the Fincha sub basin ........................................... 74 Annex X. Lists of wetlands found in the Beles sub basin ............................................... 82 Annex XI. Lists of wetlands found in the DiDessa sub basin ......................................... 84 Annex XII. Lists of wetlands found in the Dabus sub basin ........................................... 84 Annex XIII. Lists of wetlands found in the Muger sub basin .......................................... 85 Annex XIV. Lists of wetlands found in the Muger sub basin ..................................................... 85 Annex XV. Lists of wetlands found in North Gojjam sub basin ................................................. 85 iii List of Figures Figure 2 1 Wetalds distribution around Lake Tana .................................................................. 9 Figure 3. 1 Assessment Study areas ........................................................................................ 16 Figure 4. 1 Wetland distributions in Tana sub basin at wereda level .................................. 19 Figure 4. 2 Wetland distributions in Debub Gojjam sub basin at wereda level .................. 20 Figure 4. 3 Wetland distributions in Fincha sub basin at wereda level ............................... 20 Figure 4. 4 Wetland distributions in Dabus sub basin at wereda level ................................ 21 Figure 4. 5 Wetland distributions in Didessa sub basin at wereda level ............................. 21 Figure 4. 6 Wetland distributions in Muger sub basin at wereda level ................................ 22 Figure 4. 7 Wetland distributions in Welaka sub basin at wereda level .............................. 22 Figure 4. 8 Wetland distributions in Beshilo sub basin at wereda level .............................. 23 Figure 4. 9 Wetland distributions in Jemma sub basin at wereda level .............................. 23 Figure 4. 10 Rice cultivation in Fogera swamps ................................................................... 25 Figure 4. 11 Wetlands used for grazing .................................................................................. 26 Figure 4. 12 Local boats made from wetland products (Papyrus) in Lake Tana ............. 27 Figure 4. 13 Flock of Eurasian Cranes and other large waterbirds, Fogera Plain, ........ 29 Figure 4. 14 Nymphaea sp. and sedges along roadside wetlands in Fogera Plain ........ 30 iv List of Tables Table 2. 1 Wetland types ............................................................................................................ 6 Table 2. 2 Wetland distribution by region in Ethiopia ............................................................ 7 Table 2. 3 Wetland goods and services, intrinsic attributes and ecological functions .... 14 Table 4. 1 Typical loss of wetland areas in Tana Sub- basin .............................................. 31 v Acronyms ABA Abbay Basin Authority BCM Billion Cubic Meter BoEPLAU Bureau of Environmental Protection Land Administration and Use CBOs Community Based Organizations EPA Environmental Protection Authority EWNRA Ethiopian Wetlands and natural resources Association EWRP Ethiopian Wetland Research Programme FAO Food and Agriculture organization FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia GIS Geographical Information System GPS
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • (2) 185-194 Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile and Sensory
    East African Journal of Sciences (2019) Volume 13 (2) 185-194 Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile and Sensory Properties of Traditional Cheese Varieties in selected areas of Eastern Gojjam, Ethiopia Mitiku Eshetu1* and Aleme Asresie2 1School of Animal and Range Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 2Department of Animal Production and Technology, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the chemical composition, mineral profile and sensory properties of Metata, Ayib and Hazo traditional cheese varieties in selected areas of Eastern Gojjam. The chemical composition and mineral content of the cheese varieties were analyzed following standard procedures. Sensory analysis was also conducted by consumer panelists to assess taste, aroma, color, texture and overall acceptability of these traditional cheese varieties. Metata cheese samples had significantly (P<0.05) lower moisture content and higher titratable acidity than Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. The protein, ash, fat contents of Metata cheese samples were significantly (P<0.05) higher than Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. Moreover, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium contents of Metata cheese samples were significantly (P<0.05) higher than that of Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. Metata cheese samples had also the highest consumer acceptability scores compared to Ayib and Hazo cheese samples. In general, the results of this work showed that Metata cheese has higher nutritional value and overall sensory acceptability.
    [Show full text]
  • Versus Routine Care on Improving Utilization Of
    Andargie et al. Trials (2020) 21:151 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4002-3 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Effectiveness of Checklist-Based Box System Interventions (CBBSI) versus routine care on improving utilization of maternal health services in Northwest Ethiopia: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial Netsanet Belete Andargie1,2* , Mulusew Gerbaba Jebena2 and Gurmesa Tura Debelew2 Abstract Background: Maternal mortality is still high in Ethiopia. Antenatal care, the use of skilled delivery and postnatal care are key maternal health care services that can significantly reduce maternal mortality. However, in low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia, utilization of these key services is limited, and preventive, promotive and curative services are not provided as per the recommendations. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of checklist-based box system interventions on improving maternal health service utilization. Methods: A community-level, cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of checklist-based box system interventions over the routine standard of care as a control arm. The intervention will use a health-extension program provided by health extension workers and midwives using a special type of health education scheduling box placed at health posts and a service utilization monitoring box placed at health centers. For this, 1200 pregnant mothers at below 16 weeks of gestation will be recruited from 30 clusters. Suspected pregnant mothers will be identified through a community survey and linked to the nearby health center. With effective communication between health centers and health posts, dropout-tracing mechanisms are implemented to help mothers resume service utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Land Tenure Security of Women in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation Program
    PROTECTING LAND TENURE SECURITY OF WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAND INVESTMENT FOR TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Workwoha Mekonen, Ziade Hailu, John Leckie, and Gladys Savolainen Land Investment for Transformation Programme (LIFT) (DAI Global) This research paper was created with funding and technical support of the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights, an initiative of Resource Equity. The Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights is a community of learning and practice that works to increase the quantity and strengthen the quality of research on interventions to advance women’s land and resource rights. Among other things, the Consortium commissions new research that promotes innovations in practice and addresses gaps in evidence on what works to improve women’s land rights. Learn more about the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights by visiting https://consortium.resourceequity.org/ This paper assesses the effectiveness of a specific land tenure intervention to improve the lives of women, by asking new questions of available project data sets. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to investigate threats to women’s land rights and explore the effectiveness of land certification interventions using evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation (LIFT) program in Ethiopia. More specifically, the study aims to provide evidence on the extent that LIFT contributed to women’s tenure security. The research used a mixed method approach that integrated quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative information was analyzed from the profiles of more than seven million parcels to understand how the program had incorporated gender interests into the Second Level Land Certification (SLLC) process.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Glossina Sp. and Trypanosoma Sp. in South-Western
    Duguma et al. Parasites & Vectors (2015) 8:430 DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1041-9 RESEARCH Open Access Spatial distribution of Glossina sp. and Trypanosoma sp. in south-western Ethiopia Reta Duguma1,2, Senbeta Tasew3, Abebe Olani4, Delesa Damena4, Dereje Alemu3, Tesfaye Mulatu4, Yoseph Alemayehu5, Moti Yohannes6, Merga Bekana1, Antje Hoppenheit7, Emmanuel Abatih8, Tibebu Habtewold2, Vincent Delespaux8* and Luc Duchateau2 Abstract Background: Accurate information on the distribution of the tsetse fly is of paramount importance to better control animal trypanosomosis. Entomological and parasitological surveys were conducted in the tsetse belt of south-western Ethiopia to describe the prevalence of trypanosomosis (PoT), the abundance of tsetse flies (AT) and to evaluate the association with potential risk factors. Methods: The study was conducted between 2009 and 2012. The parasitological survey data were analysed by a random effects logistic regression model, whereas the entomological survey data were analysed by a Poisson regression model. The percentage of animals with trypanosomosis was regressed on the tsetse fly count using a random effects logistic regression model. Results: The following six risk factors were evaluated for PoT (i) altitude: significant and inverse correlation with trypanosomosis, (ii) annual variation of PoT: no significant difference between years, (iii) regional state: compared to Benishangul-Gumuz (18.0 %), the three remaining regional states showed significantly lower PoT, (iv) river system: the PoT differed significantly between the river systems, (iv) sex: male animals (11.0 %) were more affected than females (9.0 %), and finally (vi) age at sampling: no difference between the considered classes. Observed trypanosome species were T. congolense (76.0 %), T.
    [Show full text]
  • Honey Bee Floras Along the Agro-Ecology, Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia
    ISSN 2664-4169 (Print) & ISSN 2664-7923 (Online) South Asian Research Journal of Biology and Applied Biosciences Abbreviated Key Title: South Asian Res J Bio Appl Biosci | Volume-3 | Issue-4 | July-Aug -2021 | DOI: 10.36346/sarjbab.2021.v03i04.001 Original Research Article Honey Bee Floras along the Agro-Ecology, Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia Abera Hailu Degaga1*, Minyahel Tilahun1 1College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Wolkite University, P.O.Box 07, Wolkite, Ethiopia *Corresponding Author Abera Hailu Degaga Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 29.06.2021 Accepted: 03.08.2021 Published: 08.08.2021 Abstract: Ethiopia is home to diverse plant species that provide nectar and pollen as bees forage. In this study, honey bee forages were assessed in three different agro-ecology districts, Jimma Zone, Southwest, Ethiopia. Random sampling techniques was used to collect the data, ninety beekeepers were interviewed using structured questioner. Key informants were interviewed with in all study areas. ANOVA of GLM and Regression were done using Minitab statistical software. Accordingly 42 honey bee’ forages; 28 trees, 6 shrubs and 8 herbs were mentioned by respondents which belong to 22 families, Fabaceae and Asteraceae were the first and second dominant family respectively. Natural forest trees, cultivated crops and fruits were identified as bee forage. Beekeepers experience and their knowledge on seasonal availability of bee forage and honey bee poisonous plants found in their locality were also assessed. In the study area traditional forest beekeeping system is practiced to produce honey. Different bee forages bear flower at different months and visited by honey bees for different number of days.
    [Show full text]
  • Airs Ethiopia Community-Based Irs Model: Comparative Evaluation
    PMI | Africa IRS (AIRS) Project Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS 2) Task Order Four AIRS ETHIOPIA COMMUNITY-BASED IRS MODEL: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION MARCH 2013 Recommended Citation: Africa Indoor Residual Spraying Project. March 2013. AIRS Ethiopia. Community-Based IRS Model: Comparative Evaluation. Bethesda, MD. AIRS Project, Abt Associates Inc. Contract: GHN-I-00-09-00013-00 Task Order: AID-OAA-TO-11-00039 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development/PMI Prepared by: Abt Associates Inc. Abt Associates Inc. I 4550 Montgomery Avenue I Suite 800 North I Bethesda, Maryland 20814 I T. 301.347.5000 I F. 301.913.9061 I www.abtassociates.com AIRS ETHIOPIA COMMUNITY-BASED IRS MODEL: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION MARCH 2013 The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... v 1. Pilot of Community-Based IRS ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Health Extension Program in Ethiopia ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Definition of Two IRS Models ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Coffee-Food Security Interface for Subsistence Households in Jimma Zone Ethiopia
    The Coffee-Food Security Interface for Subsistence Households in Jimma Zone Ethiopia John C. Beghin Yalem Teshome* North Carolina State University Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Working Paper No. 17-002 July 2016 The Coffee-Food Security Interface for Subsistence Households in Jimma Zone Ethiopia John C. Beghin Yalem Teshome* Abstract: We investigate food security in three villages in rural Ethiopia for smallholder farmers growing staple crops and coffee, and facing variable coffee and commercial input prices. The surveys were conducted in the coffee growing region of Oromia (Jimma Zone). Commercial input use among these smallholders remains sporadic, although most farmers use them occasionally. A major impediment to systematic usage is the price of these inputs. Policies lowering the unit cost and increasing the local availability of commercial inputs would be useful to systematically boost production and income generation. These smallholders rely on a major coffee cooperative to market their coffee. The cooperative helps with transportation and easing market participation decisions—it provides better prices and some market information. Many farmers rely on credit and banking services offered by the cooperative. The food insecure households are more likely to be led by a female head and to be constrained by extremely small land holdings than food-secure households. These food insecure households tend to work outside of their own farm more often than food-secure households, but in lower-return activities. In our sample, food shortages and household size do not seem to be related, although food shortages are less likely in households with more children. Despite the fast growing economy of Ethiopia, many of these households still face considerable impediments to improve their economic livelihoods and market participation because of bad roads, poor telecommunication infrastructure and limited land.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Head Smudge
    Research Article Open Access Journal of Research Article Biomedical Science ISSN: 2690-487X Distribution of Head Smudge (Helminthosporium Miyakei) of Tef Disease During Short Rainy and Main Cropping Seasons in Some Parts of Oromia and Southern Nation Nationality and People Regions of Ethiopia Ashenafi Gemechu Degete* Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Helminthosporium miyakei Head smudge of tef caused by is among the most economically important disease causing significant economic losses of yield and quality. To investigate the distribution of this disease in belg (short rainy) and main (long rainy) seasons in Oromia and SNNP regions, disease assessment survey was conducted in 2019 main season and 2020 belg season from September 25 to May 22-25 G. C. Tef fields were randomly selected at 5-10 km intervals along accessible routes. The result showed head smudge prevalence and intensity varied across locations within the zone and among districts. From a total of forty-two fields surveyed during main and belg seasons (twenty-three fields during the main season and ninteen fields during belg season) were assessed. Quncho was the most prevalent 34.78% and followed by Magna having the prevalence of 26.1% during the main season. Of the assessed areas, the highest incidence was observed in Sokoru districts of Jimma and Wondogenet of West Arsi Zone accounting for about 100% and with the mean severity value of 97%. The highest mean value of incidence was recorded on varieties Tesfa and Quncho with the mean value of 100 and 83.33% followed by local tef variety (80%) during the main cropping season, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire
    Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire Always 001a. Your name: [NAME] Is this your name? ◯ Yes ◯ No 001b. Enter your name below. 001a = 0 Please record your name 002a = 0 Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ TIGRAY ◯ AFAR ◯ AMHARA ◯ OROMIYA ◯ SOMALIE BENISHANGUL GUMZ 003a. Region ◯ ◯ S.N.N.P ◯ GAMBELA ◯ HARARI ◯ ADDIS ABABA ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${this_country} ◯ NORTH WEST TIGRAY ◯ CENTRAL TIGRAY ◯ EASTERN TIGRAY ◯ SOUTHERN TIGRAY ◯ WESTERN TIGRAY ◯ MEKELE TOWN SPECIAL ◯ ZONE 1 ◯ ZONE 2 ◯ ZONE 3 ZONE 5 003b. Zone ◯ ◯ NORTH GONDAR ◯ SOUTH GONDAR ◯ NORTH WELLO ◯ SOUTH WELLO ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST GOJAM ◯ WEST GOJAM ◯ WAG HIMRA ◯ AWI ◯ OROMIYA 1 ◯ BAHIR DAR SPECIAL ◯ WEST WELLEGA ◯ EAST WELLEGA ◯ ILU ABA BORA ◯ JIMMA ◯ WEST SHEWA ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST SHEWA ◯ ARSI ◯ WEST HARARGE ◯ EAST HARARGE ◯ BALE ◯ SOUTH WEST SHEWA ◯ GUJI ◯ ADAMA SPECIAL ◯ WEST ARSI ◯ KELEM WELLEGA ◯ HORO GUDRU WELLEGA ◯ Shinile ◯ Jijiga ◯ Liben ◯ METEKEL ◯ ASOSA ◯ PAWE SPECIAL ◯ GURAGE ◯ HADIYA ◯ KEMBATA TIBARO ◯ SIDAMA ◯ GEDEO ◯ WOLAYITA ◯ SOUTH OMO ◯ SHEKA ◯ KEFA ◯ GAMO GOFA ◯ BENCH MAJI ◯ AMARO SPECIAL ◯ DAWURO ◯ SILTIE ◯ ALABA SPECIAL ◯ HAWASSA CITY ADMINISTRATION ◯ AGNEWAK ◯ MEJENGER ◯ HARARI ◯ AKAKI KALITY ◯ NEFAS SILK-LAFTO ◯ KOLFE KERANIYO 2 ◯ GULELE ◯ LIDETA ◯ KIRKOS-SUB CITY ◯ ARADA ◯ ADDIS KETEMA ◯ YEKA ◯ BOLE ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${level1} ◯ TAHTAY ADIYABO ◯ MEDEBAY ZANA ◯ TSELEMTI ◯ SHIRE ENIDASILASE/TOWN/ ◯ AHIFEROM ◯ ADWA ◯ TAHTAY MAYCHEW ◯ NADER ADET ◯ DEGUA TEMBEN ◯ ABIYI ADI/TOWN/ ◯ ADWA/TOWN/ ◯ AXUM/TOWN/ ◯ SAESI TSADAMBA ◯ KLITE
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Willingness to Participate in Voluntary Land Consolidation in Gozamin District, Ethiopia
    land Article Farmers Willingness to Participate In Voluntary Land Consolidation in Gozamin District, Ethiopia Abebaw Andarge Gedefaw 1,2,* , Clement Atzberger 1 , Walter Seher 3 and Reinfried Mansberger 1 1 Institute of Surveying, Remote Sensing and Land Information, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (R.M.) 2 Institute of Land Administration, Debre Markos University, 269 Debre Markos, Ethiopia 3 Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 September 2019; Accepted: 10 October 2019; Published: 12 October 2019 Abstract: In many African countries and especially in the highlands of Ethiopia—the investigation site of this paper—agricultural land is highly fragmented. Small and scattered parcels impede a necessary increase in agricultural efficiency. Land consolidation is a proper tool to solve inefficiencies in agricultural production, as it enables consolidating plots based on the consent of landholders. Its major benefits are that individual farms get larger, more compact, contiguous parcels, resulting in lower cultivation efforts. This paper investigates the determinants influencing the willingness of landholder farmers to participate in voluntary land consolidation processes. The study was conducted in Gozamin District, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. The study was mainly based on survey data collected from 343 randomly selected landholder farmers. In addition, structured interviews and focus group discussions with farmers were held. The collected data were analyzed quantitatively mainly by using a logistic regression model and qualitatively by using focus group discussions and expert panels.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Spatial Distribution of Tsetse Fly and Prevalence Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-4807 (online) ISSN 2222-5668 (Paper) An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.7, 2015 Study on Spatial Distribution of Tsetse Fly and Prevalence of Bovine Trypanosomosis and other Risk Factors: Case Study in Darimu District, Ilu Aba Bora Zone, Western Ethiopia Fedesa Habte Assefa Kebede Tekalegn Desta School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box: 307 Jimma, Ethiopia Abstract African Animal Trypanosomosis is one of the major impediments to livestock development and agricultural production in Ethiopia, which negatively affect the overall development in agriculture in general, and to food self- reliance efforts in particular. Currently, about 180,000 to 200,000km 2 of fertile arable land of west and southwest of the country is underutilized. Darimu district is one of the areas with such problems. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted with the objectives of assessing the prevalence of Bovine Trypanosomosis and determines spatial distribution and apparent density of tsetse and other biting flies in the study area. In current study, a total of 650 blood samples were collected from randomly selected animals and subjected to Buffy coat parasitological laboratory technique and positive samples were subjected to thin blood smear followed by Giemsa staining. Out of the total blood sampled, 7.1% tested positive for trypanosomosis. Out of positive cases, Trypanosoma congolense (82.61%) was the dominant trypanosome species followed by mixed infection ( Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma vivax ) (8.67%).
    [Show full text]