DOCSLIB.ORG

River Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
River Assessment STATE OF MICHIGAN Michigan DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 24 September, 1999 St. Joseph River Assessment Jay K. Wesley and Joan E. Duffy FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 24 September 1999 St. Joseph River Assessment Jay K. Wesley and Joan E. Duffy The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and for access to Michigan’s natural resources. State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, age, marital status, height and weight. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please write the MDNR Equal Opportunity Office, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909, or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 1200 6th Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. 20204. For more information about this publication or the American Disabilities Act (ADA), contact, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Total number of copies printed 580 — Total cost $3,696.69 — Cost per copy $6.37 Suggested Citation Format Wesley, Jay K., and Joan E. Duffy. 1999. St. Joseph River Assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Special Report 24. Ann Arbor, Michigan. DEDICATED TO Joan E. Duffy 1954 – 1999 friend and steward of aquatic resources St. Joseph River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. 10 LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................................................................... 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................... 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 18 RIVER ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................ 21 Geography.........................................................................................................................................21 Segment 1 (Headwaters)............................................................................................................21 Segment 2 (Upper).....................................................................................................................21 Segment 3 (Middle)....................................................................................................................21 Segment 4 (Lower).....................................................................................................................22 Segment 5 (Mouth).....................................................................................................................22 History...............................................................................................................................................22 Geology and Hydrology....................................................................................................................24 Geology and Physiography ...........................................................................................................24 Climate ..........................................................................................................................................25 Annual Water Flow .......................................................................................................................26 Seasonal Water Flow.....................................................................................................................26 Headwaters and Upper..............................................................................................................27 Middle........................................................................................................................................28 Lower and Mouth.......................................................................................................................28 Daily Water Flow ..........................................................................................................................29 Flooding and Floodplains.............................................................................................................30 Channel Morphology ........................................................................................................................32 Gradient ........................................................................................................................................32 Headwaters................................................................................................................................33 Upper .........................................................................................................................................33 Middle........................................................................................................................................33 Lower .........................................................................................................................................33 Mouth.........................................................................................................................................33 Channel Cross Section ..................................................................................................................33 Headwaters................................................................................................................................34 Upper .........................................................................................................................................34 Middle........................................................................................................................................34 Lower .........................................................................................................................................34 Mouth.........................................................................................................................................34 Dams and Barriers.............................................................................................................................35 Headwaters................................................................................................................................36 Upper .........................................................................................................................................37 Middle........................................................................................................................................37 Lower .........................................................................................................................................37 Mouth.........................................................................................................................................38 5 St. Joseph River Assessment Soils and Land Use Patterns............................................................................................................. 39 Soils............................................................................................................................................... 39 Headwaters ............................................................................................................................... 39 Upper......................................................................................................................................... 39 Middle ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Lower......................................................................................................................................... 40 Mouth ........................................................................................................................................ 40 Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 40 Bridges and Other Stream Crossings ........................................................................................... 41 Water Quality ................................................................................................................................... 42 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Combined Sewer Overflows.......................................................................................................... 43 Point Source Pollution.................................................................................................................. 43 Nonpoint Source Pollution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GRAND RIVER MARKETPLACE & MCNICHOLS RD DETROIT, MI Type: Lease WAYNE COUNTY
    SEQ OF GRAND RIVER AVE GRAND RIVER MARKETPLACE & MCNICHOLS RD DETROIT, MI Type: Lease WAYNE COUNTY PROPERTY TYPE: Shopping Center DESCRIPTION: Great opportunity to be part of an exciting RENT: Endcap: $29.00/SF new development on Grand River Ave in Inline: $25.00/SF Detroit. This property will be situated on the NNN EXPENSE: Est. at $5.00/SF southeast corner of Grand River and McNichols, right across the street from a AVAILABLE SPACE: Bldg A: 1,400 SF, land lease new Meijer. This area is extremely dense Bldg B: 7,700 SF, divisible with over 53,600 households in a 3-mile Bldg C: 9,000 SF, divisible radius and Grand River is a heavily travelled TENANT ROSTER: Meijer (across the street) – road in Detroit with 24,292 vpd. Call us to be coming spring 2015 part of this opportunity! TRAFFIC COUNT: Grand River northwest of McNichols = 24,292 cpd McNichols east of Grand River = 20,060 cpd CONTACT: John Kello Scott Sonenberg (248) 488-2620 Radius: 1 Mile 3 Mile 5 Mile Pop. Density: 15,811 134,922 345,587 Avg. HH Income: $39,100 $49,140 $51,737 LANDMARK COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES – Licensed Real Estate Brokers. The information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates are used for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Supply Development and Management Alternatives for Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties, Michigan
    Water-Supply Development and Management Alternatives for Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties, Michigan By K. E. VANLIER, W. W. WOOD, and J. 0. BRUNETT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1969 Prepared in cooperation with the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600363 For ...e by the Superintendent of Doewnenta, U.S. Government PrintintJ Oftiee Wuhin-'on, D.C. 20402-Priee 13.20 (paper eover) Stoek Number 2401-02422 CONTENTS Page ~bstract ------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction --------------------------------------------------- 1 Purpose and scope -·---------------------------------------- 2 ~cknowledgments _ ----__ ------------------------------------ 2 Characteristics of the region ------------------------------------- 3 The economic base and population ---------------------------- 5 VVater use ------------------------------------------------- 9 VVithdrawal uses --------------------------------------- 9 Nonwithdrawal uses ------------------------------------ 12 Sources of water ----------------------------------------------- 13 The hydrologic cycle ---------------------------------------- 13 Interrelationship of ground and surface waters ------------ 14 Induced recharge --------------------------------------- 16 Water in streams -------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Human Impacts on the Grand River
    Historical Human Impacts on the Grand River Even before Europeans settled on the east banks of the Grand River, in what is now downtown Grand Rapids, humankind had been affecting the water quality of the Lower Grand River Watershed. Many native peoples used the Grand River for fishing, transportation, and other daily activities. 1“The Grand River is Michigan’s largest stream. It extends 270 miles through Jackson to Grand Haven. The Indians knew it as ‘Owashtanong’, meaning ‘far away waters’.” The Grand River Times in 1837 mentioned the Grand River as “one of the most important and delightful [rivers] to be found in the country” with “clear, silver-like water winding its way through a romantic valley.” Europeans impacted the river greatly in the next one hundred years as industrialization spread across the country. As early as 1889, Everette Fitch recorded the detrimental effects humankind was having on the Grand River. She wrote, “The channel was, as usual, covered with a green odiferous scum, mixed with oil from the gas works.” Even more than a century ago the Grand River was deteriorating, its banks clogged with mills and factories and its water clogged with logs and dams. In its history the river has been abused with waterpower, river-dependant industries, large increases in population, stripping of the forests, and discharges of chemical and sewage wastes. The prediction in 1905 by the Grand Rapids Evening Press was that by the year 2005 the Grand River would be more a sewer than a river. Today’s Human Impacts on the Grand River Today, technology and knowledge have been used to improve water quality in the main channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Infrastructure
    MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE State of the State: Michigan’s Infrastructure Olivia Rath January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Transportation & Mobility 5 Energy 8 Water 11 Information & Communications 14 Infrastructure & Justice 17 Conclusion & Discussion 19 Appendix A: Potential Infrastructure Investments 21 Appendix B: Resource Guide 23 MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE | State of the State of Michigan’s Infrastructure 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he State of Michigan is well positioned for economic, social and environmental leadership: The combination of engineering talent, powerhouse academic institutions, unparalleled T freshwater ecosystems, automotive and mobility leadership and more distinguish the state on a national level. Appropriately caring for and investing in its infrastructure can help drive the state toward an economically robust, environmentally sustainable and socially just future. • Transportation & Mobility: Building on its history of mobilizing the world, Michigan has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership in future mobility that prioritizes carbon neutrality, public health and safety, and economic strength. Addressing rapidly deteriorating transportation infrastructure is key. • Energy: Given Michigan’s stated goals on carbon neutrality, shifting the state’s energy system to become increasingly digital, decarbonized and distributed is essential. Efforts to upgrade and expand existing aging infrastructure are important as well. • Water: A severe public health crisis has illustrated the consequences of underinvestment and decision-making without adequate community representation. The state has an opportunity to use machine learning to identify and replace hazardous water lines and address stormwater and wastewater vulnerabilities, and move toward a Michigan that is purer for all. • Information & Communications: Enhanced information and communications infrastructure can enable proactive, real-time asset management across all infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN
    Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN a. FRWC b. GREEN c. Earth Force d. MSU Extension; 4-H Youth Development e. School Administration Letter (Phase II & Participant Appreciation) f. Flint River GREEN Objectives Section Two – Information for Mentors a. Who are mentors? b. Timeline for Teachers and Mentor Interactions c. Importance of Mentors d. Inquiry Training e. How to talk to youth f. Sample Presentations for Mentors Section Three – BEFORE River Activities a. Curriculum Benchmarks and Standards i. 8th Grade Earth Science Standards ii. 10th Grade Biology Standards b. Incorporating Other Teachers iii. Civic Engagement: Social Studies, Language Arts iv. Technology: Media Support, Presentations v. Sharing Testing: Chemistry, Mathematics c. Ordering Materials vi. Shelf Life of Chemicals vii. Disposal of Old Chemicals d. Inquiry Training: Why is the Data Important viii. How Can the Information Be Used ix. Who Is Currently Interested in the Data e. Selecting A Testing Site / Finding A Good Fit f. Preparing Kids for the Day at the River x. Attire Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org xi. Who Does Which Test g. Run Through the Tests h. Looking at Historical Data i. Permission Slip/Photo releases j. Notifying the media and elected officials xii. Sample Press Release k. Optional Activities xiii. Model Watershed Activity xiv. Watershed Planning – Desired & Designated Uses xv. ELUCID – Flint River Watershed by MSU Institute of Water Research Section Four – Day At the River a. Deciding Who Goes to the River b. Checklist for Things to Take Out to the River c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline 2009 2010
    Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline *Enclosed Document ^Referenced in Documentary 2009 February o Michael Brown serves as Temporary Mayor.^ August o Dayne Walling elected as Mayor.^ September Preliminary Engineering Report Lake Huron Water Supply Karegnondi Water Authority*^ o The third study of the Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) plan. Prior reports were in 1992 and 2006. This report was meant to study 2 alternatives, continuing purchase of water from Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD) or to build a new pipeline to supply raw water from Lake Huron. o This report clearly states the differences between raw and treated water, and explains in detail the construction costs needed to upgrade Flint’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in order to properly treat water. o Additionally, in Appendix 7, the report mentions the lead and copper program and corrosion control requirements, even including the chemical composition of orthophosphate. o An upgrade to the WTP of approximately $7 million would be required in order for the plant to properly treat water on a continuous basis. o These upgrades are necessary to destroy bacteria, viruses, and prevent waterborne disease. Note: At the time of the inception of the KWA, the requirements of treating raw water, upgrades needed to be done for the WTP to properly treat water, and cost estimates of DWSD being more cost effective than the KWA were clear and known to at least two persons, Drain County Commissioner Jeff Wright and Mayor Walling. Both of whom had clear legal, ethical, and patriotic duty to the citizens of Flint as their elected representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Greenway Plan
    2019-2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION 3 Location 3 Climate 3 Natural Resources 4 Land 4 Water and Wetlands 5 Trails and Greenways 7 Vegetation and Wildlife 8 Potential Conservation Areas 8 Social Characteristics 11 Regional Population 17 Economics/Business and Industry 18 School Facilities 19 Investing In Parks, Recreation and Open Space 20 Tourism 21 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE 22 Plan Jurisdiction 22 Parks Operations and Management 22 Organizational Chart 23 Budget 24 RECREATION INVENTORY 24 Map of Parks and Recreation Areas owned or operated by Niles Charter Township 25 Parks Inventory, Evaluation, and Barrier-Free Assessment 26 Other Township and Nearby Recreational Opportunities 31 Cultural/Historic Buildings and Property 32 Regional Parks 33 City of Niles Parks 33 Water Activity - Public Access Sites 34 Area Campgrounds 34 Area Golf Courses 34 Other Opportunities 34 Northern Indiana Parks Affiliated with Indiana-Michigan River Valley Trail 34 Status Report of Previous DNR Grant-Assisted Projects 35 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING AND PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS 36 2018 Public Input and 2018 Survey Results 37 MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 49 Mission Statement 49 Overall Planning Goals 49 ACTION PLAN 50 General Park Projects 50 Other Potential Projects 51 Individual Park Projects 52 PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENTATION 61 Public Input Session 61 Public Notice of Review and Comment Period 63 Public Notice of Public Hearing of the Proposed Plan 64 Resolution of the Township Board 65 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes – Public Hearing 66 Letter to County Planning Commission 68 Letter to Regional Planning Agency 69 Letter to Department of Natural Resources 70 Recreation Plan Certification Checklist 71 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As a community, Niles Charter Township has demonstrated complete understanding of the value, and broad scope, of benefits that comprehensive recreational planning can bring to residents and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Dowagiac Assessment Report
    Dowagiac River Restoration Final Assessment Report June 27, 2013 Prepared for: Pokagon Band of Potawatomi 58620 Sink Road Dowagiac, MI 49047 DOWAGIAC RIVER RESTORATION DOWAGIAC RIVER ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared for Pokagon Band of Potawatomi 58620 Sink Road Dowagiac, MI 49047 Prepared by Inter-Fluve, Inc. 301 S. Livingston St., Suite 200 Madison, WI 53703 608-441-0342 June 27, 2013 June 11, 2013 [2] DOWAGIAC RIVER RESTORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................4 PROJECT GOALS ...........................................................................................................................4 CRITICAL ELEMENTS IN THIS REPORT .................................................................................................6 WATERSHED OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................7 GENERAL ...................................................................................................................................7 HISTORIC IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................9 GEOLOGIC HISTORY .................................................................................................................... 13 Bedrock Geology .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 Ground-Water Data Michigan
    � 1980 GROUND-WATER DATA FOR MICHIGAN BY G.C. HUFFMAN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open - File Report 81-811 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION CONVERSION FACTORS The following factors may be used to convert the inch-pound units published in this report to the International System of Units (SI). Multiply inch-pound units By To obtain SI units acres (a) 0.4047 hectares (ha) feet (ft) .3048 meters (m) inches (in) 25.4 millimeters (hut) miles (mi) 1.609 kilometers (km) million gallons (106 gal) 3,785 cubic meters (m3) gallons (gal) 3.785 liters (L) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND-WATER DATA FOR MICHIGAN 1980 by G. C. Huffman U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 81-811 Prepared in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lansing, Michigan 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director For additional information write to: Office of the District Chief Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Lansing, Michigan 48910 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Scope 1 Uses of data in this report 1 Availability of records 2 Other ground-water reports 2 Well-numbering system 9 Ground-water levels 10 Area ground-water data 10 Alpena County 12 Branch County -city of Coldwater 13 Calhoun County -city of Battle Creek 14 Clinton County -city of St. Johns 15 Eaton County -Delta Township 16 Grand Traverse County 17 Ingham County city of Lansing 18 city of Mason 19 East Lansing-Meridian Water Authority 20 Lansing Township 20 Michigan State University 21 Jackson County city of Jackson 22 Kalamazoo County city of Kalamazoo 23 city of Portage 24 Marquette County - Iron Range area 25 Oakland County - Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority 26 Oceana County 27 Sanilac County 28 Van Buren County 29 Washtenaw County - city of Ann Arbor 30 -city of Ypsilanti 31 -Ypsilanti Township 32 Tables 33 Selected references 51 iii FIGURES Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1506 N GRAND RIVER AVE LANSING, MICHIGAN Request for Developer Qualifications RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue
    1506 N GRAND RIVER AVE LANSING, MICHIGAN Request for Developer Qualifications RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue Development Opportunity....................................................................................................... 4 Community Overview .............................................................................................................. 5 Market Conditions and Opportunities ................................................................................... 10 Site Overview ......................................................................................................................... 14 Site Utilities ............................................................................................................................ 16 Additional Site Information .................................................................................................... 17 Preferred Development Scenario .......................................................................................... 18 Project Incentives ................................................................................................................... 20 Selection Process and Criteria ............................................................................................... 21 Schedule for Review and Selection ........................................................................................ 22 2 RFQ | Lansing 1506 North Grand River Avenue 1506 North Grand River Avenue, Lansing The Ingham County Land Bank seeks a development
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Approved and Pending Watershed Plans
    Nonpoint Source Program Approved and Pending Watershed Plans TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary of Approved Watershed Plans ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Watershed Plans .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Lake Huron Initiative ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Cadillac District Watersheds .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Bear Creek (Manistee County) Watershed ....................................................................................................................... 10 Betsie River Watershed..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Black Lake Watershed ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Boardman River Watershed .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]