The Dirty Deeds of Silicon Valley
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cases in Entrepreneurship | Fall 2015 Tr 09:30-10:45Am @ Miller Hall “Ideation Lab” 111
THIS SYLLABUS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT THE INSTRUCTOR’S DISCRETION MGT B493 | CASES IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP | FALL 2015 TR 09:30-10:45AM @ MILLER HALL “IDEATION LAB” 111 INSTRUCTOR: JON ATKINSON, MBA. E-MAIL: [email protected] TELEPHONE: OFFICE: (504) 864-7938 PERSONAL CELL: (504) 994-0786 (EMERGENCY ONLY) OFFICE HOURS (MILLER 345): BY APPOINTMENT PREREQUISITE COURSES: MGT -B245AND MKT -B280. OVERVIEW This class uses HBS (Harvard Business School) Case Method to explore various topics related to starting, growing, and “exiting” scalable, high growth, businesses. Focus is given to high profile successes and failures across a variety of industries with the goal of unlocking the “secrets” of Silicon Valley and other successful innovation clusters. How is value created and distributed by innovative, forward looking, often cobbled together, new businesses that ultimately have a meaningful impact on the everyday lives of large numbers of people? How and why do such businesses often fail spectacularly? How do aspiring entrepreneurs best equip themselves, build teams and management structures, and design products to compete in this winner take all environment? The case method puts the student in the driver seat, solving real problems, faced by real companies, often with limited information and uncertain outcomes. This trains students to be entrepreneurs or “intrapreneurs” increasing their confidence and making key decisions across a variety of functional areas. The class follows the themes promulgated by the “How to Start a Start-up” lecture series developed by Sam Altman, founder of Y-Combinator (YC), for Stanford University. This series of publicly available lectures features some of Silicon Valley’s best and brightest sharing in-depth lessons about specific topics and challenges they have faced as founders, investors and mentors working with high growth companies. -
Ketan Parekh
Stock Market Scams in India INTRODUCTION Introduction Financial scams have a habit of cropping up with an alarming regularity in the Indian financial system. We have reconciled to financial irregularities to such an extent that we simply do not pay heed to smaller scams that take place around us on a daily basis. I am, or rather was, a part of the financial machinery for a few years, and trust me even the private sector is not entirely free of the machinations of unscrupulous and enterprising scamsters. The scope of the money involved multiplies manifold in the public sector, with a corresponding drop in accountability. India has seen some of the most high-profile scandals where investors have lost billions of rupees just because a few people in high places could not control their greed. The Satyam Computer Services fraud is neither the first nor will it be the last corporate scam to have hit India, so investors must be on guard and ask for more information before making any investment decision, says former Sebi chairman M Damodaran. But with corporates, brokers, banks, politicians, regulators colluding at times, many a multi- crore scam has hit India. And the saga is likely to go on. India has seen some of the most high-profile scandals where investors have lost billions of rupees just because a few people in high places could not control their greed. Over the Years there have been numerous fraud and scandals in the Indian Stock Market. These scams have had a very major impact on the stock markets. -
Executive Branch
EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide to the President.— Anita Decker Breckenridge. Director of Oval Office Operations.—Brian Mosteller. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 276, 456–9000. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Dr. Jill Biden.—Sheila Nix, EEOB, room 200, 456–7458. -
Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The
EARLY DRAFT - NASAWATCH.COM/SPACEREF.COM Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander MacDonald, Editor In the next decade, NASA will seek to expand humanity’s presence in space beyond the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit to a new habitation platform orbiting the moon. By the late 2020’s, astronauts will live and work far deeper in space than ever before. The push to cis-lunar orbit is part of a stepping-stone approach to extend our reach to Mars and beyond. This decision to explore ever farther destinations is a familiar pattern in the history of American space exploration. Another major pattern with historical precedent is the transition from public sector exploration to private sector commercialization. After the government has developed and demonstrated a capability in space, whether it be space-based communications or remote sensing, the private sector has realized its market potential. As new companies establish a presence, the government withdraws from the market. In 2015, we are once again at a critical stage in the development of space. The most successful long-term human habitation in space, orbiting the Earth continuously since 1998, is the International Space Station. Currently at the apex of its capabilities and the pinnacle of state-of-the-art space systems, it was developed through the investments and labors of over a dozen nations and is regularly re-supplied by cargo delivery services. Its occupants include six astronauts and numerous other organisms from Earth’s ecosystems from bacteria to plants to rats. Research is conducted on the spacecraft from hundreds of organizations worldwide ranging from academic institutions to large industrial companies and from high-tech start-ups to high-school science classes. -
Amazon's Antitrust Paradox
LINA M. KHAN Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox abstract. Amazon is the titan of twenty-first century commerce. In addition to being a re- tailer, it is now a marketing platform, a delivery and logistics network, a payment service, a credit lender, an auction house, a major book publisher, a producer of television and films, a fashion designer, a hardware manufacturer, and a leading host of cloud server space. Although Amazon has clocked staggering growth, it generates meager profits, choosing to price below-cost and ex- pand widely instead. Through this strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e- commerce and now serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon it. Elements of the firm’s structure and conduct pose anticompetitive concerns—yet it has escaped antitrust scrutiny. This Note argues that the current framework in antitrust—specifically its pegging competi- tion to “consumer welfare,” defined as short-term price effects—is unequipped to capture the ar- chitecture of market power in the modern economy. We cannot cognize the potential harms to competition posed by Amazon’s dominance if we measure competition primarily through price and output. Specifically, current doctrine underappreciates the risk of predatory pricing and how integration across distinct business lines may prove anticompetitive. These concerns are height- ened in the context of online platforms for two reasons. First, the economics of platform markets create incentives for a company to pursue growth over profits, a strategy that investors have re- warded. Under these conditions, predatory pricing becomes highly rational—even as existing doctrine treats it as irrational and therefore implausible. -
There Better Be a Naked Cheerleader Under Your Bed‖
―THERE BETTER BE A NAKED CHEERLEADER UNDER YOUR BED‖: REPRESENTATIONS OF SOUTHERN, WORKING CLASS MASCULINITY IN KING OF THE HILL Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University–San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Master of ARTS by Joshua C. Shepherd, B.J. San Marcos, Texas May 2011 ―THERE BETTER BE A NAKED CHEERLEADER UNDER YOUR BED‖: REPRESENTATIONS OF SOUTHERN, WORKING CLASS MASCULINITY IN KING OF THE HILL Committee Members Approved: __________________________ Susan Weill, Chair __________________________ Kate Peirce __________________________ Cindy Royal Approved: __________________________ J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT By Joshua Charles Shepherd 2011 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author‘s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Joshua Shepherd, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and assistance from some wonderful people in my life. My supervisor, Dr. Susan Weill, professor at Texas State University-San Marcos, who guided me throughout this process and pushed me to become a better writer; Dr. Kate Peirce, professor at Texas State University-San Marcos for all her help and spawning this idea with her course on Gender and Media; Dr. -
Executive Branch
EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Personal Aide to the President.—Katherine Johnson. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide.—Reginald Love. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 202, 456–9000. Deputy Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Alan Hoffman, EEOB, room 202, 456–9000. Counsel to the Vice President.—Cynthia Hogan, EEOB, room 246, 456–3241. -
Startup School Content Outline 093015
How to Start a Startup Spring 2016 Purpose: • Enable interested and motivated EECS engineering students to adopt an entrepreneurial mindset, produce a customer validated, agilely designed and financially rationalized product worthy of continued startup development Strategy: • Building from Stanford’s successful CS 184: How to Start a Startup, complimented by KU Entrepreneurship created materials in a flipped class environment, supplemented by both class lectures/discussions to gain deeper understanding and development of students’ own new venture concept to deliver a strong experiential learning focus. Tactics: • Six seminars at non-regular class hours to avoid conflict • Class discussion led by successful KU entrepreneurial alumni • Student teams will create a new product/service and develop a comprehensive business commercialization plan (the course deliverable) with assistance from KU Center for Entrepreneurship faculty. • Students successfully completing this curriculum are automatically candidates for The Catalyst, KU student startup accelerator and Proof of Concept funding support. Content: • Seminar 1: Ideas and Products: Why Start a Startup and Idea Generation • Seminar 2: Business Strategy: Developing the Business Model • Seminar 3: Product Development: How to Build Products Users Love • Seminar 4: Sales and Marketing: Building brand equity and revenues • Seminar 5: Financing the Venture: How to Raise Money, plus legal and accounting basics • Seminar 6: Growing the Brand; Finalizing the Commercialization Plan How to Start a Startup: -
Penny Stock - Wikipedia, the Visitedfree Encyclopedia on 7/28/2015 Page 1 of 4
Penny stock - Wikipedia, the visitedfree encyclopedia on 7/28/2015 Page 1 of 4 Penny stock From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Penny stocks, also known as cent stocks in some countries, are common shares of small public companies that trade at low prices per share. In the United States, the SEC defines a penny stock as a security that trades below $5 per share, is not listed on a national exchange, and fails to meet other specific criteria.[1] In the United Kingdom, stocks priced under £1 are called penny shares. In the case of many penny stocks, low market price inevitably leads to low market capitalization. Such stocks can be highly volatile and subject to manipulation by stock promoters and pump and dump schemes. Such stocks present a high risk for investors, who are often lured by the hope of large and quick profits. Penny stocks in the USA are often traded over-the-counter on the OTC Bulletin Board, or Pink Sheets.[2] In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have specific rules to define and regulate the sale of penny stocks. Contents ◾ 1 Concerns for investors ◾ 1.1 Notable cases ◾ 2 Regulation ◾ 3 References ◾ 4 External links Concerns for investors Many penny stocks, particularly those that trade for fractions of a cent, are thinly traded. They can become the target of stock promoters and manipulators.[3] These manipulators first purchase large quantities of stock, then artificially inflate the share price through false and misleading positive statements. This is referred to as a "pump and dump"[4] scheme. -
Practice Fusion Gets $23 Million to Compete in “Winner-Take-All” Market for Electronic Medical Records Technology Wade Roush 4/5/11
Practice Fusion Gets $23 Million To Compete in “Winner-Take-All” Market for Electronic Medical Records Technology Wade Roush 4/5/11 Practice Fusion, a San Francisco startup that claims to be the fastest-growing maker of electronic medical records systems for physicians’ practices, may be able to supercharge that growth now, thanks to a $23 million infusion from Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund and a posse of other investors. The Series B investment, announced today, brings Practice Fusion’s total venture backing to $30 million and will help the company “reach every doctor and practice in the country in our market,” says founder and CEO Ryan Howard. Founders Fund, started in 2005 by Thiel and fellow PayPal alums Ken Howery and Luke Nosek, is a first- time investor in Practice Fusion, as are syndicate partners Artis Capital Management and Glynn Capital Management. Series A investors Morgenthaler Ventures and Felicis Ventures also participated in the round. With billions in dollars in federal incentives awaiting medical practices that adopt electronic recordkeeping systems, there’s a veritable gold rush underway, with dozens of startups and established companies vying to supply doctors with systems for digitizing patient records, reviewing test results, ordering electronic prescriptions, and the like. Practice Fusion, with its free, easy-to-adopt Web-based system, is seen as one of the leaders in the field. The big jump in funding for the five-year-old startup—from a $7 million A round in early 2010 to the current $23 million B round—is in part a recognition of how quickly its system seems to be catching on with doctors. -
Exploratory Study of Consumer Issues in Online Peer-To-Peer Platform Markets Task 4 – Case Study: Airbnb
Exploratory study of consumer issues in online peer-to-peer platform markets Task 4 – Case study: AirBnB February 2017 Justice and Consumers EUROPEAN COMMISSION Produced by Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) on behalf of Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers Directorate E - Consumers Unit E.1 – Consumer Policy E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Exploratory study of consumer issues in online peer-to-peer platform markets Task 4 – Case study: AirBnB Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers EU Consumer Programme 2017 EUR [number] EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). This report was produced under the EU Consumer Policy Programme (2014-2020) in the frame of a service contract with the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) acting under the mandate from the European Commission. The content of this report represents the views of the contractor and is its sole responsibility; it can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or Chafea or other body of the European Union. The European Commission and/or Chafea do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor do they accept responsibility for any use made by third parties thereof. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). -
Chang Won Jung
Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/ Masterarbeit ist in der Hauptbibliothek der Tech- nischen Universität Wien aufgestellt und zugänglich. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at The approved original version of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/eng Professional MBA Entrepreneurship & Innovation The Brotopian Cycle: Gender Inequality in Tech Startups A Master’s Thesis submitted for the degree of “Master in Business Administration” supervised by Univ. Prof. Dr. Sabine Köszegi submitted by WonJung (Kaitlyn) Chang Immatriculation Number: h1165354 Vienna, August 2018 I Affidavit I, WonJung (Kaitlyn) Chang, hereby declare 1. that I am the sole author of the present Master’s Thesis, "The Brotopian Cycle: Gender Inequality in Tech Startups", 119 pages, bound, and that I have not used any source or tool other than those referenced or any other illicit aid or tool, and 2. that I have not prior to this date submitted this Master’s Thesis as an examination paper in any form in Austria or abroad. Vienna, 31.08.2018 Signature II For my parents InAe WoonJu Kim and Sooman Chang, who raised me to be a strong, confident woman. III Abstract In the wake of the #MeToo era, gender equality has successfully gained a bigger space within public discourse around the world. However, tech startups, supposedly one of the most innovative industries to lead our future, are still heavily male-dominated, with a study in 2017 revealing a meager 17% female ratio in Silicon Valley startups that have less than 100 employees (Bradshaw & Kwong 2017).