Research Turned Into Action the Global Governance Programme

Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies

Research Turned into Action The Global Governance Programme

Foreword

The Global Governance Programme, with its re- “A New Governance for the European Union and the search, policy and training dimensions, provides a Euro: Democracy and Justice”. European setting to conduct research at the highest The GGP is also proud of having, among its research level and promote synergies between research and projects, the Globalisation Database (GDB) that col- policy-making, to generate ideas and to identify crea- lects and unites statistical resources on trends and in- tive and innovative solutions to global challenges. dicators of globalisation. Indicators not only measure In 2012, the Programme significantly enriched its re- and describe reality, but also have the potential to steer search dimension introducing four research strands and direct political, administrative and institutional – Modes of Global Governance, International Trade behaviour in the areas in which they are applied. For Observatory, Development, and Climate Govern- this reason, their emergence and application in global ance. The research strands mirror the cross-relation governance is increasingly recognised as one of the and cross-fertilisation necessary, now more than ever, complex modes of “governance without government” for true global governance. Co-ordinated by leading at global level, and their analysis is hence an urgent scholars, over the past year, the strands have brought demand. together global thinkers and actors of the calibre of In 2013, the GGP High-Level Policy Seminars will of- Lawrence Lessig, Ben Hammersley, and Thomas C. fer even more opportunities for the worlds of research Heller, to mention but a few, to analyse and discuss and policy to dialogue and put forward solutions to respectively, new forms of political participation, issues such as the prospect of the Euratom Treaty ap- the role of the Internet in social trends, and climate proach in the Middle East, gender quotas at global change. In 2013, the Programme further enriches its level, international humanitarian law, and social in- research community with two new strands, “Cultur- novation. al Pluralism: The Driver for Social Innovation” and Moreover, in the past year, the Programme has re- “Global Economics: Multi-lateral Co-operation and newed and strengthened its commitment to train the Policy Spill-overs”, co-ordinated respectively by Anna leaders of the future. In only three years, over 350 Triandafyllidou and Bernard Hoekman, and welcom- executives, diplomats, officials from international ing an increasing number of Jean Monnet fellows as organisations and academics from all over the world well as the first Robert Schuman senior fellows. have participated in the Academy of Global Govern- A breeding ground for brilliant minds, the Programme ance Executive Training Seminars. In the coming aims not only to reach out to decision-takers and pol- year, the Academy will offer more executive trainings, icy-makers and to make its voice heard on issues that with second and third editions for tax policy, climate are high on the international agenda, but also to shed governance, EU foreign policy, development policy, light on the ones that have been overlooked. and regional integration, as well as a broader array of In 2012, for example, GGP fellows and affiliated topics linked to the research strands of the GGP. scholars carried out extensive research on the govern- This is just an overview of some of the achievements ance of the Euro. In this context, a High-Level Policy of the GGP and its objectives for 2013; you will find Seminar, with the participation of José Manuel Durão more in the following pages. Barroso, President of the European Commission, dis- cussed the reform of the Euro area governance, and Enjoy reading this brochure and follow us at I presented a report to the European Parliament on http://globalgovernanceprogramme.eui.eu

Luís Miguel Poiares Maduro Director of the Global Governance Programme

Table of Contents

▄ THE DIMENSIONS OF THE GGP 6 RESEARCH 6 Climate Governance: Institution-building and the EU 7 Cultural Pluralism: The Driver for Social Innovation 8 Development: Emerging Markets and International Co-operation 10 Global Economics: Multilateral Co-operation and Policy Spill-overs 12 International Trade Observatory 14 Modes of Global Governance 15 GGP Research Projects 17 Governance: Exploring the Tax Dimension 17 GLOTHRO 17 The Globalisation Database 18 Global Governance by Indicators 19 The GGP Research Community 20 2012-2013 Jean Monnet/GGP Fellows 22 2012-2013 Robert Schuman/GGP Fellows 29 POLICY 32 TRAINING 34 ▄ BEING AT THE HEART OF THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE DEBATE 43 GLOBAL THINKERS AND ACTORS AT THE GGP 43 THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME NETWORK 44 ▄ GGP PUBLICATIONS 45 ▄ OUR TEAM 48 The Dimensions of the GGP

The world faces new demands and new expecta- our governance structures and capitalize on new actions at an ever increasing pace. Governments are tors, transnational resources and expertise. confronted with challenges which increasingly span No player – intergovernmental organisation, aca- beyond national borders - the instability in the in- demic institution, national government or private ternational economic and financial system, climate company – can stand alone and act to address global change, development and poverty reduction, human- issues. A harmonised global action is needed. itarian crises and intervention, terrorism, conflict- With its three dimensions, Research, Policy, and resolution and peace-building. Many solutions can Training, the Global Governance Programme aims only be shaped at regional and global level. To be ef- to contribute to this collective effort by sharing ficient and effective in this complex, interlinked and knowledge, developing new ideas, and serving as a fast-changing scenario, we are required to re-design bridge between research and policy-making.

RESEARCH

In 2013, the GGP enriches its research dimension with WU Vienna University Global Tax Policy Centre at two new research strands “Cultural Pluralism: The the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law. Driver for Social Innovation” and “Global Econom- The Programme further enlarges its research commu- ics: Multi-lateral Co-operation and Policy Spill-overs”, nity also by welcoming academics in the early stages which complement the already existing research of their careers (Jean Monnet post-doctoral fellows) strands: “Climate Governance: Institution-building and senior academics (Robert Schuman fellows) to and the EU”, “ Development: Emerging Markets and conduct policy-oriented research from complemen- International Co-operation”, “ International Trade Ob- tary and crosscutting perspectives, bridging research servatory”, and “Modes of Global Governance”. and policy-making, generating debate and producing The GGP continues to support the Globalisation a wide array of publications. Database and the GLOTHRO research projects, and Both research strands and projects are co-ordinated this year introduces two new ones: “Global Govern- by leading academics working on global issues, from ance by Indicators” and “Governance: Exploring the the EUI and from other internationally recognised Tax Dimension”, a joint initiative of the GGP and the leading institutions.

6 The Global Governance Programme CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: INSTITUTION-BUILDING AND THE EU

Denny Ellerman Research Strand Director The goal of the Climate Governance research strand viding lessons for the rest of the world concerning is to explore the unique governance issues presented what works and what does not. by climate change, in particular that of the creation This research is largely conducted together with the and organisation of suitable global governance insti- closely-affiliated Climate Policy Research Unit of tutions. Climate change presents a particular chal- the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. lenge for global governance since no single country The principal research topics in 2013 are the inter- can act alone to solve the problem. However, certain action of renewable energy and emissions-trading nations or actors may take it upon themselves to policies, how firms respond to a carbon price, and be leaders in mobilising global action, as the Euro- the use and pricing of offsets in trading systems. pean Union has done, acting on behalf of its Mem- The Climate Governance research strand also aims ber States. For climate change, leadership involves to be a forum for world distinguished experts, poli- working patiently in a multi-national setting to cre- cy-leaders and young scholars to discuss the scien- ate the institutions, be they global or regional, that tific, political, and economic dimensions of the cli- will engage other nations in taking appropriate ac- mate problem. Because of the frequent interactions tions. This activity is similar to what has been done between climate, trade, and development, and as to encourage common action in other domains, the occasion warrants, there is a strong link with the such as free trade, democracy, and human rights. “Development” and “International Trade Observa- Two aspects of the climate problem are especially tory” research strands. important in organising suitable global governance The Climate Governance research strand engages institutions: the cumulative nature of the underly- other non-EUI entities such as the Climate Policy ing problem, which requires some action (and cost) Initiative, the Chair in Climate Economics at the now, in order to avoid more severe longer-term University of Paris-Dauphine, and the Joint Pro- damages, and sharing the burden of common action gram for the Science and Policy of Global Change equitably among countries of widely-differing eco- at MIT. nomic capabilities. In 2013, the strand devotes particular attention to research concerning the effectiveness of actions and institutions developed within the EU to address the climate problem. This research builds on the insight that the EU is an emerging multi-national institution with increasing willingness and capability to address common problems among the constituent Member States. In the area of climate, the EU is rapidly becoming a leader on the global stage and an example of how participating nations can overcome differences in national priorities and circumstances to pursue common goals. As such, the climate-policy choices, within the EU, and the mechanisms for implementing them provide a policy laboratory pro-

7 The Global Governance Programme CULTURAL PLURALISM: THE DRIVER FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION

Anna Triandafyllidou Research Strand Director The tragic events in Norway in the summer of 2011 Governing “Old” and “New” Minority Identities: (Utøya), the violence against Christians in Nigeria Legal Perspectives and in Egypt in August 2012, the ethnic clashes be- Cultural diversity challenges multi-cultural policies tween Kyrgyz and Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan (Central and law: minority groups who feel marginalised Asia) in the summer of 2010, are just a few exam- within states have increasingly advanced claims for ples in a series of events which show that the chal- rights and equality. From a comparative perspec- lenges of ethnic and religious diversity in the world tive, different ways of accommodating cultural di- have come full circle. versity can be followed, resulting in quite different This research strand explores the major cultural di- regimes of legal, political and cultural recognition. versity challenges that Europe is facing in today’s There is, actually, an on-going process of European- globalised world. Significant and effective action is isation and globalisation of law-making with regard hard for national and local governments to achieve, to accommodating cultural diversity of native and thus the strand explores the national, regional and immigrant minorities. global dimensions of such challenges and develops policy-oriented research on four core research The Global Financial Crisis: Accommodating themes. Cultural Diversity between a Rock and a Hard Place New Global Others – Cultural Diversity after The global financial crisis has brought to the fore 1989 and 9/11 the socio-economic dimensions of cultural diversity Since the implosion of the Communist regimes challenges with pressing urgency. Indeed, the ques- in 1989, and, in particular, after the tragic events tion of integrating cultural diversity and the ques- of 9/11, Muslims and Islam have become the new tion of re-distribution are inter-dependent. How- “Significant Other” against which the West seeks ever, the relationship between cultural diversity and to assert itself. Recent developments have led to a the economy is not only about re-distribution, but re-consideration of migrant integration and ethnic- also about growth and development. Diversity man- minority policies in a number of European coun- agement is a distinct branch of research that looks tries. into how inequality can be fought through positive business practices that turn diversity into an asset. The EU Eastern Enlargement: The Cultural Pluralism strand is intended to main- New Cultural and Ethnic Diversity Challenges stream the topic in a variety of disciplines and, as The intra-EU migrants resulting from the enlarge- such, is closely-linked, in particular, to the “Modes ment of the EU membership from 15 to 25 were of Global Governance” and “Development” re- not expected to pose particular cultural or religious search strands. With the former joint research ef- diversity challenges since they are white, Christian forts, cultural pluralism is explored by looking at and largely secularised. However, reality always how cultural diversity challenges global govern- evolves in unexpected ways and the second half of ance theory and practice, and by exploring the no- the 2000s has been marked by a steep rise of anti- tion of “pluralism” in different academic and policy Roma sentiment as well as outright discrimination contexts (for example, Constitutional Pluralism in and racism. legal theory vs. Religious Pluralism or Secularism

8 The Global Governance Programme in political theory). With the latter, by looking at DIVA, which have produced important tools for how cultural diversity impacts on development ef- policy assessment (the Tolerance Indicators and the forts – for instance, not only how cultural, ethnic or Media Capacity to Promote Migrant Integration as- racial diversity can cause tensions and prevent so- sessment). The strand also established a partnership cio-economic development, but also on how direct with the Migration Policy Centre for an executive investment or development aid contribute not only training (21-23 January 2013) targeted at civil serv- to economic growth but also to the advancement of ants and experts from Eastern Partnership countries human-rights norms and practices. and the Russian Federation on interaction between The strand will also collaborate with other pro- the regions of origin and the regions of destination, jects of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced migration policies and the regulation of migration, Studies, such as ACCEPT PLURALISM and ME- and processes of integration.

Global Higher Education: The Future of Ideas, 19-20 November 2012

9 The Global Governance Programme DEVELOPMENT: EMERGING MARKETS AND INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION

Giorgia Giovannetti Research Strand Director In a rapidly changing economic and political situ- domestic resources is particularly low. Building on ation, there is a need for innovative ideas and new earlier research and on a partnership with the Afri- frameworks, a fresh look at development issues and can Development Bank for a project on the impact a clear shift in the development agenda. To these of social protection on inclusive growth, the strand aims, research of the Development research strand studies the linkages between social protection policy concentrates on two main lines: development poli- and multi-dimensional approaches to poverty, risk cies and the impact of international integration on and vulnerability. The strand also tackles the issue the emerging markets. The first line, development of the changes in social protection schemes in North policies, unfolds in three projects: the first on the Africa in the light of the Arab spring. governance of official development assistance, the second on social protection, and the third on poverty Poverty and Vulnerability and vulnerability in less developed countries. The research on poverty and vulnerability aims at highlighting the circumstances under which policies Development Policies can be effective even in situations in which property rights are not guaranteed, governments are not legiti- Governance of Official Development Assistance mate, there is a conflict in act, and the like. Particu- (ODA) lar attention is devoted to “land and water grabs”, a Research concerning ODA Governance is currently key issue for countries with diffuse poverty and bad focused on the reform of the main international or- governance because of the number of recent “grab- ganisations involved in aid provision. Giorgia Gio- bing” deals and their social consequences for peas- vannetti is a member of the team established by the ants working, but not owning, the land. In this area, Centre for Global Development (Washington), which the research strand has started collaboration with the is working on the production of a report on “FAO Fondation pour les Etudes et Recherches sur le Dével- Challenges and Opportunities”, and discussing more oppement International (FERDI) to carry out joint in general proposals for governance reforms of the research. UN Rome-based Agencies (FAO, IFAD and WFP). Impact of the International Integration of Social Protection Emerging Markets Following the recent European Commission com- This year research will also integrate a study on the munication “Social Protection in European Union growing relevance of emerging economies. The De- Development Cooperation”, social protection has be- velopment research strand analyses the growth of come a central issue for the post-Millennium Devel- emerging countries (especially the BRICs) and their opment Goals (MDGs) development agenda. Social strategic interaction with developed and developing protection positively impacts upon people’s lives - re- countries. Given that several emerging economies ducing poverty and vulnerability - and enhances the are now playing key roles in all the major areas of capacity of countries to exit from fragile situations, global governance, often challenging existing pow- legitimating domestic governments. However, there ers, this study is of interest not only for EU Member are still many challenges to its extension, especially States but also other global players. in low-income countries where the mobilisation of The research and the complementary activities to

10 The Global Governance Programme be undertaken during the year are oriented towards implies collaboration with the “Cultural Pluralism” a better understanding of recent trends, the main research strand and with the Migration Policy Centre challenges to the emerging countries’ development (MPC) at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced processes and their impact on the world economic Studies (EUI). With the MPC, a research project has system. The strand analyses the impact of the inter- been initiated on the role of Chinese migration in national integration of emerging markets (especially shaping the country’s development and its impact on China) on both developed and developing countries. the host economies. Similarly, as economic integra- The focus is on bilateral trade, foreign direct invest- tion is strictly intertwined with changes in the global ment and other capital flows. But attention is also to policy context, and as the rise of emerging countries be devoted to more complex forms of interaction, is challenging the existing international balance of including the role of migration in shaping economic power, there are connections with the “Modes of relations and the effects of increasing international Global Governance” research strand. Strategic inter- co-operation towards developing countries. A mul- action with the “International Trade Observatory” ti-disciplinary perspective is going to be adopted. and the “Climate Governance” research strands is To this aim, the strand fosters collaboration with also fostered, taking into consideration the growing other research strands of the GGP, as well as with participation of the emerging economies in multi- external partners. Understanding the dynamics and lateral trade and investment negotiations, within the the consequences of internal and external migration WTO, as well as in climate negotiations.

WTO Dispute Settlement System, 5-7 Novembre 2012

11 The Global Governance Programme GLOBAL ECONOMICS: MULTILATERAL CO-OPERATION AND POLICY SPILL-OVERS

Bernard Hoekman Research Strand Director The overall objective of the research in this strand more economic activities are subject to internation- is to contribute to a better understanding of the al competitive pressures. These developments not need for – and design of – multi-lateral economic only create opportunities but also adjustment costs co-operation in an increasingly multi-polar world for rich and poor countries alike. Governments are through analysis of policy spill-overs and options under pressure to create economic environments to improve the global governance of economic poli- that support the competitiveness of national firms, cies. raising the question of what types of policies are The global economic landscape has changed and most effective in enhancing productivity, generating will continue to change. Emerging markets account jobs and managing the volatility that concomitantly for an increasing share of global GDP and pur- accompanies integration into the global economy. chasing power. Information, communications and Examples of specific issues that are likely to be ana- transportation technology advances have lowered lysed include the policy implications of internation- barriers for firms to compete globally - the Internet al supply chains (e.g., improving trade facilitation has made it feasible for even very small firms to sell and logistics performance to help achieve food se- internationally. Digitisation has greatly increased curity), issues related to the design and enforcement the types of products that can be traded and ever of intellectual property rights, the implications of

Political Participation in a Globalised World, 20-22 June 2012

12 The Global Governance Programme the “servitisation” of economic activities, tax/subsi- of governance and competition policy and market dy policies and related incentives, the efficiency and regulation. efficacy of public procurement policies, the impact An important feature of the research, training and of state-owned or state-controlled enterprises, and policy-focused activities of the Global Economics the role of services-related policies in determining strand is collaboration with external partners. Re- the design and efficiency of supply chains and firm- search is implemented in partnership with institutes level productivity performance. and think-tanks around the globe. Partners include Policies may have international spill-over effects. the Economic Research Forum for the Arab coun- Examples include macro-economic policies that tries, Iran and Turkey (ERF), the Groupe d’Economie generate sustained current-account imbalances, Mondiale (SciencesPo), and the World Bank. exchange-rate intervention and “currency wars”, climate change-motivated “green industrial policies”, and policies affecting access to natural resources. A key policy challenge is to identify how the market- segmenting and global welfare-reducing effects of national policies can be reduced through international co-operation. Trade agreements are one instrument, but alternative forms of co-operation of a more voluntary nature may be more feasible and effective in addressing spill-overs. A specific area of interest is the efficiency and distri- butional dimensions of the processes that are used by governments or industry bodies to set standards that impact on international trade and production. International standardisation of regulatory norms has tended to be driven by the major OECD countries, raising questions with regard to the appropri- ateness of the resulting norms for small countries and nations with limited capacity to participate. The Global Economics research strand works in close co-operation with the “International Trade Observatory” strand, with planned joint projects on the multi-lateral trading system and the international dimensions of public procurement. There are also connections with the research strands “Climate Governance”, “ Modes of Global Governance” and “Development”, as well as several subject areas of other Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Stud- ies programmes, especially those on the economics

13 The Global Governance Programme INTERNATIONAL TRADE OBSERVATORY

Petros C. Mavroidis Research Strand Director The International Trade research strand established and relations scholars, to maximise from their ex- the International Trade Observatory (ITO) at the pertise and knowledge, and to expose researchers to GGP in 2011. The Observatory aims to further a insights in areas linked to their work. better understanding of the dynamics at stake in the The research strand closely collaborates with the field of multi-lateral and regional trade integration, new GGP “Global Economics” research strand. To- with a special insight into the WTO, to generate gether, the two strands build on the outcomes of the policy debates and provide policy recommendations High-Level Policy Seminars “International Trade on the main challenges of international trade, both and the Doha Round” (2011) and “Trade Round- present and future. table” (2012) and convene key ambassadors to the The strand builds on the past year's research activi- WTO, senior scholars and experts to discuss the ties, continues to monitor the evolution of WTO questioning of the role of the WTO, the emergence case law and fosters research projects led by young of preferential trade agreements, as well as of global scholars on issues such as: the balance between fi- production chains. nancial trade liberalisation and the necessity to avoid The ITO also continues its co-operation with the and manage financial crises, government behaviour “Climate Governance” research strand, especially when dealing with certified risks and public anxi- with regard to the analysis of the interplay between eties, and the impact of the European Parliament trade liberalisation and climate change. This issue on the adoption of trade and investment legislation has been high on the agenda of the research carried and agreements following the entry into force of the out by Petros C. Mavroidis, who now collaborates Treaty of Lisbon. with Stefanie Hiesinger (EU Commission) on the The ITO sponsors the newly-established Working EU ETS (Emissions Trading System) and its place- Group on International Trade and Investment, a fo- ment in the WTO context. rum put together at the initiative of a number of EUI researchers, where experts in the fields of trade and investment have agreed to present their most recent work. Mads Adenas (University of Oslo and member of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention – Of- fice of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), Joseph McMahon (University College Dublin), and Mark Koulen (WTO), to mention but a few, participate in the forum. In 2013, renowned experts in the field of international trade, such as Keith Maskus (University of Colorado), Kamal Saggi (Vanderbilt University), and Robert Wolfe (Queen’s University, Political Sci- ence Department), are affiliated to the ITO and are involved in a number of research and policy activities of the strand. The ITO aims to bring together not only trade, but also international economic law

14 The Global Governance Programme MODES OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Miguel Poiares Maduro Research Strand Director The Modes of Global Governance research strand and, in particular, carries out comparative research focuses on the study of different institutional alterna- into the institutional design used in different inte- tives for governance at regional and global level. The gration schemes in America, Africa and Asia. States strand aims to answer some fundamental questions: have become increasingly involved in regional or- When is global governance necessary? What institu- ganisations worldwide and research is needed to tional forms can it take? What should determine the know the rationale behind these. With a focus on choices between the different institutional forms? formal integration, this project investigates why Institutional alternatives, in this context, com- states engage in forms of regional integration and prehend any social decision-making process. The what the effects are. strand’s purpose is to identify the issues that require Antoine Vauchez (European Center of Sociology forms of governance beyond the state, and inves- and Political Science at the Sorbonne - CESSP) is tigate what such forms can be. In addition, the re- studying judicial and legal networks as informal search carried out by the affiliated scholars, as well mechanisms of global governance in the context of as Robert Schuman and Jean Monnet fellows at the a proliferation of international and regional courts, GGP, aims to identify a set of criteria for choosing and of the diversification of their areas of interven- among different forms of governance in the most di- tion (trade, competition, human rights, environ- verse contexts through a number of projects. ment, etc.). In particular, he considers the variety of Inter-dependence creates a demand for governance. legal actors and sites (law firms, learned societies, As world inter-dependence grows so do the needs judicial networks, research institutes, etc.) in which and claims for global governance. At the same time, a transnational field of global justice is being defined the forms of global governance which we see de- (in terms of best practices, legal standards, critical veloping are strongly contested and, more impor- stakes, valued credentials, etc.). tantly, difficult to map and assess. It seems that a Eric Brousseau (Université Paris Dauphine and framework of analysis for global governance and the EUI), Giovanni Sartor (EUI) and Alexander Trech- choices that it entails is missing. A first project, led sel (EUI) study some of the tensions that emerge by Miguel Poiares Maduro and Neil Komesar (Wis- in the governance of the Internet. The Internet, in consin University) aims to address such lacuna. It fact, may include content and support practices that studies, on the one hand, the existent institutional are viewed as illegal by the applicable legal systems, alternatives for regional and global governance, and, which raises two issues: how to police the Internet on the other, the criteria that ought to determine the while preserving the freedoms of its users, and the institutional choices to be made between them. The Internet’s capacity to support creation and innova- project builds on the methodology of comparative tion according to viable business models; how to institutional analysis developed by Komesar and reconcile the global dimension of the Internet (and aims to establish a framework for understanding of the human rights exercised over the Internet) with and shaping institutional choices beyond the state. the particular cultural, economic, and security in- Other projects study particular forms of global gov- terests of countries and communities. This research ernance. Carlos Closa Montero (Institute for Public project assesses different procedures for regulation Goods and Policies – CSIC) is doing comparative and enforcement, and reviews the effectiveness and research on different regimes of regional integration possible side-effects of different institutional alter-

15 The Global Governance Programme natives, especially with regard to the impact on so- ance. An example of a joint initiative can be found in cial media and on international relations. the High-Level Policy Seminar (HLPS) on the gov- The Modes of Global Governance research strand ernance of football, organised with the International develops collaboration with other research strands Trade Observatory research strand. This HLPS rep- of the GGP. This is a natural consequence of the focus resents a first step in a possible broader project on of this strand on the methodology and institutional the different dimensions of the globalisation and choices involved in different forms of global govern- governance of sport.

The Democratic Governance of the Euro, 10 May 2012

16 The Global Governance Programme GGP RESEARCH PROJECTS

GOVERNANCE: Research Project Directors JEFFREY OWENS (WU Global Tax Policy Centre at the Institute for EXPLORING THE Austrian and International Tax Law), TAX DIMENSION ANA PAULA DOURADO (University of Lisbon) PASQUALE PISTONE (WU Vienna University and Salerno University)

Joint Initiative GGP - WU Global The initiative does not focus on tainable growth and financial Tax Policy Centre at the Institute technical tax issues, but rather on stability; for Austrian and International analysing taxation in the broader ■ Managing the global environ- Tax Law political, social and economic ment and scarce resources: The The joint initiative examines the context. The Initiative investigates tax governance issues. interface between tax and govern- five key topics: The initiative aims to provide ance by undertaking policy related ■ Tax, governance, accountabil- a platform for dialogue among research on how the broad princi- ity and transparency; opinion-makers both from the EU ple of governance can be applied ■ Tax competition: establishing and from key third countries. The in the area of taxation. global rules of the game; research builds upon and expands It examines the policy implica- ■ Governance, illicit flows and the work being carried out by oth- tions of the G20-led movement for the role of tax administrations; er research institutes and interna- greater tax transparency. ■ Global tax governance, sus- tional organisations.

GLOTHRO Research Project Director Martin Scheinin (EUI)

Human rights obligations - in par- man-rights scholarships. search Networking Programme ticular, in the field of economic, It focuses on deepening the un- under the European Science Foun- social and cultural rights - need derstanding of extra-territorial dation (2010-2014) and is co-or- to be re-thought in the era of glo- human-rights obligations (ob- dinated at the EUI, as a GGP re- balisation. The GLOTHRO (Glo- ligations incumbent on other search project, by Martin Scheinin, balisation and Transnational Hu- states than the territorial state) who also represents the EUI on the man Rights Obligations) Research and widening the understanding GLOTHRO steering committee. Networking Programme (Euro- of human-rights responsibilities Through the organisation of scien- pean Science Foundation) is based by exploring the direct human- tific meetings, GLOTHRO facili- upon this assumption and aims rights obligations of non-state ac- tates the exchange of insights, from at creating a real research com- tors (in particular, international diverse fields of study, and stimu- munity on the issue, in attracting organisation and transnational lates applications for new research. new scholars to the field, as well corporations). For more information visit the as mainstreaming the topic in hu- GLOTHRO has the status of a Re- website www.glothro.org

17 The Global Governance Programme THE GLOBALISATION Research Project Director DATABASE Gaby Umbach (EUI)

The GGP develops a Globalisation knowledge and facts that support the responsible use of resources. Database that presents statistical a better understanding of today’s Through its underlying “beyond resources on globalisation. With world. It focuses on fundamental the GDP approach”, it embraces its thematic focus on globalisation, political, economic, environmen- key facts on the performance of sustainable development and hu- tal and societal changes that affect nations and informs about the way man well-being, it embraces the the global inter-relations of poli- human-beings live, the freedoms economic and political foundation cies, politics and polities. The data that they enjoy, and the limitations of global human interaction, and presented is grouped under the that they face around the world. incorporates its environmental and twelve thematic and three horizon- As far as its data structure is con- societal basis. With this focus, the tal areas most strongly exposed to cerned, both objective and subjec- Database follows a broad and in- the effects of globalisation. tive data are to be incorporated formed approach to globalisation, Both the design of the database and into the information presented sustainable development and hu- its data structure unite the most for the group of 193 UN member man well-being, as well as to their important statistical data on trends states. Besides objective data, sub- triggers, drivers and effects. of globalisation, human well-be- jective data is provided, as it says The Database aims to provide ing, sustainable development and much about the perception of the

GLOBALISATION DATABASE

Economic Development Demographics Energy and Trade Environment (Status quo and (Finite Natural Resources (Increasing Diversity and (Conditions and Threats) Challenges) and Renewables) Catch Up)

Financial Activities and Food, Agriculture and Freedom, Conflicts and Governance Structure Fisheries Risks (Global Institutions and (Texture and (Patterns and Challenges) (Crisis and Threats) Features) Interweavement)

Health and Living Technological Human and Societal Human Mobility Conditions Development Development (Migration and its (Well-being and its (Participation and (Quality and Shape) Background) Fundament) Progress)

Global Trends (Prospects in Key Areas) Sustainable Livelihood (Sustainable Development in the light of Human Activities) Prosperity of Nations and Human Well-being (Beyond GDP – Indices’ scores)

18 The Global Governance Programme quality of life, which is influenced trend section also offers interpre- Legatum Institute, the ILO, the not solely by objective facts such tations and understandings of the SSF, Transparency International, as monetary aspects or marketable data presented in view of sustain- the UN and the World Bank. goods. In view of these individual able livelihood, national wealth, Apart from further extending its perceptions and evaluations of life, human well-being and the quality data pool, work on the Globalisa- subjective data helps us to learn of life. tion Database in 2013 strongly fo- more about the foundation of hu- Data presented in the Database re- cuses on the finalisation of its In- man well-being in the age of glo- late to the period from the 1960s ternet environment and its on-line balisation. to the present day and include launch. Moreover, data on global trends country level data for all 193 UN The Globalisation Database pro- are collected in order to highlight member states whenever possible. ject (2011-2014) is financially potential future paths. The trends’ Due to the targeted country cov- supported by the Portuguese section of the database reflects the erage of UN member states, UN Fundação Francisco Manuel dos inter-generational component to institutions and international bod- Santos (Lisbon). It is led by Gaby which a sustainable globalisation ies are key statistical sources. The Umbach and involves a team of path has to pay tribute in order collaboration partners of the Da- researchers of the GGP and of the to increase the sustainable quality tabase include Eurostat, the FAO, Fundação Francisco Manuel dos of our global living together. The the Fund for Peace, GALLUP, the Santos (www.ffms.pt).

GLOBAL Research Project Directors GOVERNANCE Nehal Bhuta (EUI) BY INDICATORS Gaby Umbach (EUI)

The study of indicators and their governance, human well-being or development, application and im- use in global governance is an ur- competitiveness) as well as the per- pact of indicators, sets of indica- gent contemporary concern, re- formance of states, international or tors, composite indicators and lated to fundamental questions of regional organisations and differ- indices in global governance and political steering, regulation and ent domains of policy implementa- global administrative law. It seeks governance at global level. tion. These measures are therefore to understand these differently in- Indicators as instruments of global often closely connected to policy stitutionalised governance forms, governance not only quantify and judgements and prescriptions, and and investigate questions of de- simplify empirical phenomena may become a means of bench- mocracy and accountability that in order to help us to understand marking and standard-setting. accompany their deployment in complex realities and to quan- Starting in 2013, this research pro- global governance and law. tify measures, they also help us to ject focuses on the analysis of in- The research project builds upon measure and evaluate many aspects dicators as instruments of global and adds to the work of the Glo- of global governance, be it state governance, which impact on balisation Database, to deepen action, policy specific develop- the behaviour of actors in global- insights into the role of such ments or international institutions. governance contexts, potential- knowledge products in global Composite indicators and indices ly bypassing traditional, public governance. It is also a horizontal are applied to describe and meas- authority-based forms of global project which cross-cuts the topics ure multi-dimensional concepts governance and international law. and activities of the GGP research (such as sustainable development, The project aims to examine the strands.

19 The Global Governance Programme THE GGP RESEARCH COMMUNITY

The GGP aims to continue en- doctoral Fellowship Programme riching its pool of academic ex- of the RSCAS, the GGP offers one pertise, by recruiting professors, or two year fellowships to post- “It was a great fellows and researchers with doctorate fellows in the early stag- privilege to be the strong and specialised knowledge es of their academic careers. The first post-doctoral in global governance issues. Jean Monnet/GGP fellows are in- fellow of the programme. Within the fellowship schemes of creasing on a yearly basis, starting The energy of the GGP the European University Institute with four fellows in the academic helps you push back the (EUI) and of the Robert Schuman year 2010-2011, seven in 2011- frontiers of research Centre for Advanced Studies (RS- 2012 and eleven in 2012-2013. in social sciences and CAS), the GGP offers fellowships For the academic year 2013-2014, particularly in law. An to young and senior academics, fourteen highly-promising junior enthralling experience.” namely, Jean Monnet Post-doc- researchers who specialise in the Saida El Boudouhi (Université toral, Robert Schuman and Marie subjects dealt with by the GGP Re- Paris II - Panthéon-Assas) Curie fellowships. search Strands have been selected. 2009-2010 The deadline for applications for Jean Monnet Post-doctoral the academic year 2014-2015 is Fellowship Programme 25 October 2013. Through the Jean Monnet Post- Email: [email protected]

“Participation in the GGP offers a unique opportunity to accomplish one’s full academic potential but also to explore how scholarly ideas can interest policy-makers at the highest level. Only the generosity, efficiency and dedication of the scholars and programme officers who compose the GGP’s permanent staff can make this happen. I feel deeply privileged I have been able to be part of this great adventure for a year.”

Grégoire Mallard (Northwestern University) 2011-2012

20 The Global Governance Programme “The context of globalisation makes inter-disciplinary academic reflection on global governance essential. Bringing together academics and practitioners alike, the GGP offered me an excellent environment to take part in and to shape a unique research agenda that embraced central elements of my academic focus on global governance.”

Gaby Umbach (Cologne University and Research Project Director Globalisation Database-GGP) 2010-2011

Robert Schuman Fellowships EU/Asia Fellowships Robert Schuman Fellowships The GGP also offers EU/Asia provide a framework for estab- Fellowships to encourage post- lished academics with an inter- doctoral research on EU/Asia “One year within the national reputation to pursue relations or global issues of im- Global Governance their research at the RSCAS for portance for both Europe and Programme means an a period of three to ten months. Asia. Intellectually distinguished immersion in the most The fellowship is awarded upon fellows have the opportunity to valuable worldwide invitation only. With the aca- conduct two years of research networks of scholars and demic year 2012-2013, the GGP articulated as follows: one year practitioners working strengthens its research commu- at the EUI and one year at one of on the multiple faces of nity with the first Robert Schu- the Asian participant institutions Global Governance. man Senior Fellows. (Chinese Academy of Social Sci- A great experience!” ences, Keio University, IEEM/ Cristina Dallara (Research Marie Curie Fellowships University of Macau). Centre on Judicial Studies, National Research Council – The EUI and the GGP act as host Bologna) 2011-2012 institutions for Marie Curie Fel- For more information on the lowships awarded by the Euro- fellowship opportunities at the pean Commission. GGP visit the website.

21 The Global Governance Programme 2012-2013 Jean Monnet/GGP Fellows

knowledge of the historical roots of EC law in the interwar and immediate post-Second World War period. The long-term objective of Dr Bailleux’s research is to contribute to the analysis and understanding of the specific consistency and functioning of an emerging global field of law, as well as its relationship with the broader global field of power of which it is naturally part. In this regard, as a Jean Mon- net Fellow, she works on the role of transnational Julie University of Paris 1 Panthéon- jurist networks in the globalisation of competition Bailleux Sorbonne law, that is, in the emergence of international insti- Law beyond States: Transnational tutions aiming at improving the harmonisation of Jurist Networks in the Making of a competition policies, and in the adoption of com- Global Rule of Law mon standards within nation-states.

Julie Bailleux was trained both in law and political science at the Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne where she was awarded a Ph.D. in political science in June 2012. Her dissertation focuses on the inven- tion of EC law as an academic discipline in France. Through an in-depth analysis of the work of actors who took part in this process, she apprehended the emergence of EC law in France – that is to say, both, of a body of juridical specialised knowledge about the European Community and of the community of its specialists – as the uncertain product of a system of transactions between law professors and politi- University of Amsterdam cal actors (national and European) engaged in the Lisa Clarke Public-Private Partnerships in the construction and in the legitimisation of a suprana- International Legal Order tional Europe. For the last three years, she has been a member of the Polilexes-DEJUGE project entitled “Law and jurists in the governing of Europe”, whose objective was to analyse the consistency and Lisa Clarke graduated from Osgoode Hall Law influence of communities of jurists on EU govern- School in 2002 with an LLB from the University of ance in order to examine more generally how legal Helsinki in 2005 with and an LLM and a speciali- actors contribute to the legitimisation of the Euro- sation in public international law. In 2012, she ob- pean political order. Dr Bailleux is also a member tained her Ph.D. from the University of Amsterdam the RICHIE working group “History of European writing on the “Responsibility of Hybrid Public-Pri- Law”, which contributes to the improvement of the vate Bodies under International Law: A Case Study

22 The Global Governance Programme of Global Health Public-Private Partnerships”. She was also a visiting fellow at the Lauterpacht Cen- tre for International Law, Cambridge University in 2010-2011, and a visiting researcher at the Institute for International and Comparative Law in Africa, University of Pretoria in 2011-2012. She has lec- tured on international human-rights law and other general international law topics at the University of Amsterdam and the University of Pretoria. She is also a reporter for the Oxford Law Reports – Inter- national Law in Domestic Courts (ILDC) reporting Patrycja University of Warsaw on Canadian decisions discussing international law Karolina Global Safety Governance and issues. She worked as a junior professional consult- Dabrowska- Human Rights: An Analysis of EU, ant with the United Nations High Commissioner Klosinska US and International Law/Measures Aimed at Preventing Bio-terrorism for Refugees (UNHCR) in Field Office Sisak, Croa- tia. In addition, she has been called to the bar as a barrister and solicitor in two provinces in Canada – Patrycja Dabrowska-Klosinska is Assistant Profes- Newfoundland & Labrador and Alberta. The focus sor at the Centre for Europe, University of Warsaw, of her research is on the shift in governance regard- where she is part of an EU law team and is engaged ing global issues from states and international or- in teaching and interdisciplinary research on Eu- ganisations to public-private partnerships and con- ropean and global issues. She is a managing editor cerns regarding responsibility under international of the Yearbook of Polish European Studies and a law. Public-private collaboration is an increasingly member of the editorial board of the German Law common method of dealing with pressing global is- Journal. She was a visiting scholar at the University sues in areas including, among others, health, cli- College London and the University of Milan. She mate change, food, water, anti-doping in sports, and has authored and co-authored many publications the Internet. This research will give insights into on risk regulation, EU law and governance, includ- public-private collaboration, from the standpoint ing “EU Governance of GMOs: Political Struggles of responsibility under international law, and will and Experimentalist Solutions?” in Experimental- form part of an ongoing discussion on the exercise ist Governance: Towards a New Architecture? C. of public power by private (or partly private) enti- Sabel and J. Zeitlin (eds) (Oxford: Oxford Univer- ties. Other research interests include public inter- sity Press, 2012), Free movement of goods in the EU national law, international human-rights law, law of (co-author, in Polish, Warsaw 2010), “The Polish international organisations, global health law, and Regulatory System on GMOs: Between EU Influ- refugee law. ence and National Nuances”, in Uncertain Risks Regulated, E. Vos and M. Everson (eds) (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009), “Civil Society In- volvement in the EU Regulations on GMOs: From the Design of a Participatory Garden to Growing Trees of European Public Debate?”, (2007) 3 Jour- nal of Civil Society and The Effects of Preliminary Rulings of the European Court of Justice [in Polish] (Warsaw 2004). She holds a Ph.D. in Law from the EUI in Florence and a LLM from the Jagiellonian University in Kraków. Her doctoral thesis on EU

23 The Global Governance Programme governance of GMOs received the prize for best tion, the political economy of the arms industry, the thesis from the leading Polish legal journal Państwo European Union’s Common Foreign and Security i Prawo. She was also awarded fellowships for the Policy (CFSP), insurgency and counter-insurgency. best young scholar by the University of Warsaw and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland. Her research interests include: EU law and governance, new modes of transnational governance, risk regulation, biotechnology/bio-terrorism measures and human rights, environmental, food and pharmaceuticals law, EU constitutional law, and judicial protection.

Roberto Suffolk University Dominguez Regional Security Governance in Latin America

Roberto Dominguez is Associate Professor at Suffolk University in Boston, Massachusetts. After working for several years as a political analyst and speech Marc University of St. Gallen DeVore Arms Production in a Global writer for the Foreign Affairs Ministry in Mexico, he World: Multinational Corporations, obtained an MA in International Relations and Eu- International Organizations and the ropean Studies in Spain, and earned a Ph.D. in Inter- New Face of Security Governance national Studies at the University of Miami. He has conducted research for the North South Center, the Marc DeVore holds a Ph.D. in political science from Florida European Union Center of Excellence and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the British Consulate in Miami. He was also editor an MA specialising in European Integration from of the peer-review journal Relaciones Internacion- Strasbourg’s Institut d’Etudes Politiques and a BA ales, which has been published for more than five in International Relations/Economics from Clare- decades by the National Autonomous University of mont McKenna College. Previously DeVore was a Mexico. His current research interest is on compara- lecturer/senior research fellow at the University of tive regional security governance and, in particular, St. Gallen, Switzerland, served as National Security he is working on two intertwined projects: regional Advisor to the President of the Central African Re- security governance in Latin America, and Euro- public; he has been a visiting research fellow at the pean Union-Latin American relations. His interests Department of War Studies at King’s College Lon- include the European Union, international security, don and Sciences Po, Paris. He has received Ful- regional governance, transatlantic relations and Latin bright, Truman and Chateaubriand Scholarships, as American politics and economy. His recent publi- well as grants from Harvard’s Center of European cations are the following: “The Security Role of the Studies and MIT’s Department of Political Science. United States in Asia” in the Palgrave Handbook of His research interests span globalisation and de- EU-Asia Relations (forthcoming in 2013); “The Study fence industries, European armaments co-opera- of the European Integration Process in the United

24 The Global Governance Programme States” (with S. Royo) in (2012) 11 European Political Hamburg, she examined how the heterogeneity of Science; Security Governance and Regional Organiza- formal and informal institutions among countries tions (with Emil Kirchner, London: Routledge, 2011); could explain compliance with the Foreign Bribery Lisbon Fado: The European Union under Reform (with Convention and generalise the empirical findings Joaquin Roy, Miami European Union Center, 2009); for any international agreement. She also conducted and European Union Foreign Policy (New York: Ed- empirical research on court behaviour in the Philip- wing Mellen Press, 2008). pines. Her papers appeared in the Asian Journal of Law and Economics and as a book chapter in Pro- duction of Legal Rules (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012). A central issue in international law is compliance, given the lack of enforcement at global level. While scholars point to the role of reputation, little is un- derstood about it. Dr Escresa’s research project at the RSCAS/GGP aims to fill this lacuna by exploring under what conditions reputational sanctions can serve to make countries comply with their re- spective international obligations.

Laarni University of Hamburg Escresa Reputation as Mechanism for Compliance in International Law

Prior to joining the EUI, Laarni Escresa was a post- doctorate fellow at the University of Hamburg where she conducted research on the internationalisation of law. She earned her Ph.D. (Law and Economics) from the University of Bologna and the Erasmus University Rotterdam, her MA from the University Antara Columbia University of Hamburg and Ghent University, and her BA from Haldar Rethinking Law and Development the University of the Philippines. She was scholar in residence at the University of Illinois and a recipient of various scholarships (EU Erasmus Mundus) and research grants (German Research Foundation, Marco Polo-Unibo). Her broad research interests Antara Haldar received her Ph.D. in Law from Trin- lie in the field of Law and Economics, employing ity College, University of Cambridge, in 2010. She theoretical and empirical economic methods in has studied both Law and Economics, holds a BA in analysing law and institutions. In particular, she Economics from St. Stephen's College, University of is interested in international law, criminal law, ju- Delhi, and a BA in Law from Trinity College, Uni- dicial behaviour, corruption, institutional and be- versity of Cambridge. Her doctoral research criti- havioural economics. A recurrent strand of inter- cally examined the importance of formal property est is the complementarity of formal and informal rights for economic development using two promi- sanctions as applied to criminal law, for instance. In nent credit-access programmes targeted at poverty

25 The Global Governance Programme alleviation - land-titling in Peru and micro-finance in Bangladesh. More fundamentally, it used the two programmes as a means of exploring the analytics of formal versus informal law. Before arriving at the EUI, she held a post-doctoral fellowship at the Committee on Global Thought at Columbia Uni- versity. In her post-doctoral research, she embarked on a new project to study the interactive dynamics of formal and informal law, as played out in the recent financial crisis – contrasting the responses in the US and Europe. In addition to deepening the Pablo VU University Amsterdam understanding of the relationship between formal Iglesias The Role of the European Union and informal law, this project will test the applica- Rodriguez in Global Financial Networks: Legal, Political and Economic bility of the insights of law and development outside Perspectives the developing world. Dr Haldar has been involved in high-level research projects such as the Ameri- Pablo Iglesias-Rodríguez is Senior Researcher at the can Bar Association's World Justice Project and the Faculty of Law of the VU University Amsterdam. Be- Initiative for Policy Dialogue's China Task Force. In fore, he was a post-doctoral researcher at the Faculty addition, she has worked with internationally re- of Law of Maastricht University and a fellow of the nowned policy experts in India, Canada and South Montesquieu Institute (the Netherlands). He holds a Africa, and, in the process, has been involved in im- Licenciatura en Derecho (LLB) with a Law and Eco- portant legal activism projects and contributed to nomics specialisation, an M.Phil. in Applied Financial crucial legislative reform. Dr Haldar has been the Economics (Honours) from the University of Vigo, recipient of numerous academic grants and awards, and a Master of Research and a Ph.D. from the Euro- including the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru Memo- pean University Institute. He is also a qualified lawyer rial Scholarship and the Cambridge Law Faculty’s (Madrid Bar Association). His academic experience Yorke Prize. She has also been nominated to re- includes visiting research stays and appointments at search associateships at the Centre for Business Re- the University of Cambridge (Centre for Business Re- search (CBR) and Peterhouse College at Cambridge search), the University College of London (Faculty of University. Her other research interests extend to Laws), Columbia University School of Law (EUI-Co- jurisprudence, international law, and feminist legal lumbia Fellowship), and Ghent University (Financial theory. Her research has been published and pre- Law Institute). He was also an intern at the Spanish sented widely. Chamber of Commerce in France and the European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services. He has participated, as a national expert, in projects for EU agencies and the European Commission. His areas of research and publishing are focused on financial markets regulation, global governance, company law and new institutional economics. He is particularly interested in the accountability arrangements applicable to regulators in the financial sector, as well as the influence of different types of stake- holders in financial policy-making. At the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, he conducts research on the role of the European Union in inter-

26 The Global Governance Programme national networks operating in the field of financial gary). Currently, he is pursuing a collaborative pro- markets regulation. His research addresses the legal, ject under the COST framework entitled: “The Power political and economic determinants of the EU’s in- of Legality: Practices of International Law and their fluence in the global financial arena. Politics”. He is beginning work on his second book under the preliminary title, Global Law as Legalpo- litik: An Inquiry into International Rule “through” Law. Dr Rajkovic’s research interest focus on: global governance; transnational law and regulation; international organization; post-national adjudication; global constitutionalism; rule of law; legalization; juridification; law and economics; law and development; international relations theory; international legal theory; critical legal studies; constructivism; re- gime theory; governmentality; lawfare.

Nikolas m. University of Kent Rajkovic Global Law as Legalpolitik: An Inquiry into International Rule “through” Law

Nikolas M. Rajkovic is a Lecturer in Law at the University of Kent Law School. Nikolas is formally trained both in Law and International Relations, and his inter-disciplinary research examines the politics of increasing legalisation and juridification in world Andrea Centre for European Policy Studies affairs. In 2011 and 2012, he completed the intensive Renda (CEPS) residential programme at the Harvard Law School’s The Interface between Private Institute for Global Law and Policy (IGLP). In 2013, Regulation and Ex Ante Policy he has been appointed a programme docent for the Appraisal IGLP workshop in Doha, Qatar. Previously, he was a post-doctoral researcher at the Austrian Academy of Andrea Renda is part-time professor at the EUI, Sciences and an Assistant Professor of International where he was awarded the “Morris Tabaksblat Visit- Relations at Kyung Hee University (South Korea). ing Chair on Private Actors and Globalization”, fund- In 2010, he received the “Excellent Lecture Award” ed by the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation for outstanding teaching at Kyung Hee University. In of Law. Dr Renda is also Adjunct Professor of Law 2011, Dr Rajkovic was appointed to the Management and Economics at Luiss Guido Carli University, in Committee of the COST (European Co-operation Rome, and lectures every year in other universities, in Science and Technology) Action IS1003 “Inter- such as the Erasmus University of Rotterdam, the national Law between Constitutionalisation and University of Stockholm, the College of Europe in Fragmentation: the role of law in the postnational Bruges, and Fudan University in Shanghai. A mem- constellation”. In 2008, he was nominated for the Wil- ber of the Editorial Board of the international peer- denmann Prize for best paper by a young scholar at reviewed journals Telecommunication Policy (Else- the ECPR Joint Sessions in Rennes, France. In 2005, vier) and of the European Journal of Risk Regulation he received the Outstanding Academic Achievement (Lexxion), Dr Renda sits on the scientific boards of Award from the Central European University (Hun- the International Telecommunications Society (ITS)

27 The Global Governance Programme an of EuroCPR. In his professional life, Dr Renda is fended his Ph.D. in Economics from TU Berlin in a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for European August 2012. His Ph.D. thesis is entitled “Econo- Policy Studies (CEPS) and co-manager of the CEPS metric Analyses of Carbon Resource Markets” and Digital Forum (www.digitalforum.eu). He provides addresses empirical questions regarding the major academic advice to several institutions, including the fossil-fuel markets, as well as the European market European Commission, the European Parliament, the for carbon-dioxide emission permits, the EU Emis- OECD and the World Bank. He earned a BA in Eco- sion Trading System (EU ETS). Dr Zaklan’s research nomics magna cum laude from LUISS Guido Carli currently focuses on the application of state-of-the University, Rome, in 1995; and a European Master of art empirical methods to questions of firm behaviour Law and Economics (LL.M., with distinction, from under the climate constraint. In particular, he analy- the University of Hamburg, 1996). His research in- ses firm-level determinants of both participation in, terests include law and economics, public and private and the extent of, the allowance (EUA) trade in the regulation, regulatory impact analysis, transnational EU ETS, since the dearth of relevant data, which has private regulation, antitrust and competition policy, been one of the major constraining factors inhibiting and information society policies, with emphasis on the growth of research in this area, is gradually be- telecommunications and media policy. Dr Renda ing alleviated. In his research, he considers the inter- holds a Ph.D. in Law and Economics awarded by the firm and intra-firm trading of allowances, on both Erasmus University of Rotterdam. He is the author the demand and supply sides of the market. He also of several publications, including the books Impact considers the extent to which firms exploit the possi- Assessment in the EU. The State of the Art and the bilities of inter-temporal optimisation of EUA hold- Art of the State, (CEPS, 2006); Law and Economics ings provided by the trading system. In particular, in the RIA World (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011); Inno- these are the EU ETS’s flexible mechanisms borrow- vation Policy in the EU: Towards Horizon2020 (with ing and banking. Previously, he studied economics Massimiliano Granieri, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011); and international relations in Bochum, Dublin, Bo- and The Net and the Internet (co-edited with Mario logna and Washington DC, and holds degrees from Girasole, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Trinity College Dublin, Johns Hopkins University, forthcoming). and Georgetown University. He has also taught at all these universities. Furthermore, he worked as a research assistant at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Dr. Zaklan’s research has been presented at international conferences and he has published in Energy Economics and in the Review of Finance. His research interests are in resource and climate economics, international economics, and applied econometrics.

Aleksandar German Institute for Economic Zaklan Research Firm Behaviour under the Climate Constraint: Evidence from the EU’s Emissions Trading System

Aleksandar Zaklan is a Jean Monnet Fellow in the GGP “Climate Governance” research strand. He de-

28 The Global Governance Programme 2012-2013 Robert Schuman/GGP Fellows The first three Robert Schuman/GGP fellowships, as of December 2012, have been awarded to the below senior scholars.

ós, 2009) [The Future and its Enemies], La Democ- racia del Conocimiento (Barcelona: Paidós, 2011) (Basque Prize for Literature in the Essay category) [The Democracy of Knowledge], La Humanidad Amenazada: Gobernar los Riesgos Globales (Barce- lona: Paidós 2012) [Humanity at Risk: Governing Global Risks, edited with Javier Solana], Internet y el Futuro de la Democracia (Barcelona: Paidós, 2012) [Internet and the Future of Democracy], all trans- lated into several languages. Upon the proposal of the Spanish Senate, Professor Innerarity has been a Daniel University of the Basque Country Innerarity and Instituto de Gobernanza member of the University Co-ordination Council, Democrática and now belongs to the institution ANECA (Na- Making Democracy More Complex: tional Quality Assessment and Accreditation Agen- How to Legitimate Democracy in a cy). He is also member of the Academy of Latinity Context of Dense Interdependency (September 2012 – December 2012) and of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts (headquarters in Salzburg). He is a regular editorial contributor to the newspapers El País and El Correo. Daniel Innerarity is Professor of Political and Social Philosophy, “Ikerbasque” researcher at the Univer- sity of the Basque Country (UPV/ EHU) in Saint Sebastian and Director of the Institute of Demo- cratic Governance (globernance.org). A Doctor in Philosophy, he broadened his studies in Germany on a grant from the Alexander von Humboldt Insti- tute, in Switzerland and Italy. His work mainly focuses on the cultural and political transformations of knowledge societies, on innovation in systems of government, on democracy and on globalisation. Professor Innerarity is visiting professor at various European and American universities, lately at Uni- André Luxembourg University versité de la Sorbonne (Paris 1) and Institut d'Etudes Prüm Comparing from a Legal Perspective Politiques de Bordeaux. His latest books include: La Recent Trends in Regulating Banks and Financial Markets Transformación de la Política [The Transformation (October 2012 – January 2013) of Politics] (3rd Miguel de Unamuno Prize for es- says and 2003 national Prize for Literature in the Essay category), La Sociedad Invisible [The Invisible André Prüm is Professor at the University of Lux- Society] (Espasa Essay Prize, 2004), El Nuevo Espa- embourg, where he holds the chair of Financial cio Público (Madrid: Espasa, 2006) [The New Public and Business Law and served as founding Dean of Realm], El Futuro y sus Enemigos (Barcelona: Paid- the Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (2005-

29 The Global Governance Programme 2012). Professor Prüm’s research focuses on banking and financial law, transnational commercial law and European contract law. He is the author of several books and publishes regularly in European legal journals. Together with Ole Lando, Eric Clive and Reinhard Zimmermann, he has edited the Prin- ciples of European Contract Law, Part III, prepared by the Commission on European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2003). During the last fifteen years, Professor Prüm has been deeply involved in the modernisation of Luxembourg’s legal Luca University of Birmingham infrastructure. In 1996, he created the Luxembourg Rubini The Governance of Legitimate Laboratory of Economic Law. The government of Subsidies in the World Trade the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has entrusted Organisation him with the drafting of major reforms of Luxem- (September 2012 – June 2013) bourg business law leading, in particular, to a com- plete overhaul of company law, the introduction of Dr Luca Rubini is a reader (associate professor) in the law on securitisation, the first law on electronic international Economic Law and deputy director of commerce, a law on trusts and fiduciary contracts, the Institute of European Law at Birmingham Law as well as a reform of competition law. Prüm has School. He served as référendaire (law clerk) with been recognised for this work as one of the top 100 Advocate General Jacobs at the European Court of most influential persons in Luxembourg (Paperjam Justice. He has held visiting positions at the Euro- Top 100, January 2011, rank 66/100). He received pean University Institute (Florence), the Institute his Ph.D. in Law in 1992 from the University of of International Economic Law (Georgetown), the Montpellier, obtaining the highest award for his World Trade Institute (University of Berne) and research on the “Autonomy of Guarantees on First the Bocconi University (Milan). He is fellow of the Demand”. In 1992, he was appointed Associate Pro- Centre of European Law, King’s College London, fessor at the University of Paris XI. After passing the and visiting professor at ASERI (Catholic Univer- French “Concours national d'agrégation”, he was of- sity, Milan). Dr Rubini has law degrees from the fered a chair in Private Law at the University of Nan- Catholic University, Milan (JD) and King’s College cy 2 in 1995. He continues to act as a visiting profes- London (MA, Ph.D.). sor at the University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne His main research interest lies in subsidy law and and at the University of Paris 2, Panthéon-Assas. He policy, and, more generally, in the governance of is also a member of the Independent Panel of the domestic regulation. In this regard, he published the European Central Bank and serves as a board mem- volume entitled, The Definition of Subsidy and State ber of AXA Luxembourg and KNEIP Communica- Aid – WTO Law and EC Law in Comparative Per- tion. Before becoming a full-time professor, he was spective, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), a practicing lawyer in France and a member of the which provides the first attempt to date to offer a Paribas SA’s international legal team. conceptual framework of analysis of definitional issues of subsidy in the WTO and the EU. At the GGP, Dr Rubini is mainly working on a book project on the governance of climate-change subsidies in the WTO, which will be published by Cambridge University Press in 2014. In particular, he is assess- ing the case, challenges and features of a renewed

30 The Global Governance Programme normative and institutional arrangements which Agreement, Policy Space and Law Reform”, (2012) 2 secure the appropriate policy space for government Journal of International Economic Law, and “Who’ll measures in support of the green economy. A “road- stop the rain? Allocating Emissions Allowances for map” of some of the issues and initial findings of Free: Environmental Policy, Economics and WTO this research have appeared in “Ain’t Wastin’ Time Subsidy Law”, (2012) 2 Transnational Environmen- No More. Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM tal Law (with Ingrid Jegou).

31 The Global Governance Programme POLICY TURNING RESEARCH INTO ACTION

With the High-Level Policy Semi- tween research and policy and ordinator of the U.N. Al-Qaeda- nars (HLPS), the GGP aims to aim at having an impact on policy Taliban Monitoring Team), José generate and contribute to aca- design and implementation. For Manuel Durão Barroso (President demic and policy debate on key this reason, each HLPS produces of the European Commission), issues of the international agenda. a policy paper (Robert Schuman Vitor Constâncio (Vice-President Top policy-makers and leading Centre's Policy Paper Series), of the European Central Bank), academics meet to discuss in- which presents the reflections of Gilles De Kerchove (EU Counter- sights on the present and future the academics, and a policy brief Terrorism Co-ordinator), Harold challenges of global governance (Robert Schuman Centre's “Re- Hongju Koh (Legal Adviser of and put forward ideas and sug- search Reports”), which high- the US State Department), Allan gestions to address them. lights the topical aspects of the Rosas (European Court of Justice), The debate - held under the debate and puts forward policy Rufus H. Yerxa (WTO Deputy Di- Chatham House Rule - is trig- recommendations. rector-General), Michael J. Graetz gered by the academics’ ideas and Since the first HLPS in June 2010, (Columbia University), Harold suggestions to address the issues “What should the EU Agenda James (Princeton University), and on the agenda and advanced by for Global Governance be?”, pol- André Sapir (Université Libre de the policy-makers’ reactions. icy-makers and academics of the Bruxelles), to mention but few, The HLPS create a bridge be- calibre of Richard Barrett (Co- participated in these meetings.

Trade Roundtable, 12 March 2012

32 The Global Governance Programme Courts, Social Change and Judicial Independence, 16-17 March 2012

“The meeting was a With the 2013 High-Level Policy Seminars, the GGP aims to bring to very rare moment of light cutting-edge and under-investigated aspects of global governance: inspirational and open exchanges of Targeted Killing, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and EU Policy, Nehal ideas and experiences Bhuta (EUI), February between first-rank Policy Implications of Changes in the Global Trade Landscape, constitutional or Bernard Hoekman and Petros C. Mavroidis (EUI), March international judges and The Governance of European Football: Looking Backwards, Looking scholars from a large Forward, Miguel Poiares Maduro and Petros C. Mavroidis (EUI), April variety of countries and Tax Policy in the 21st Century: New Concepts For Old Problems, perspectives.” Ana Paula Dourado (University of Lisbon), Jeffrey Owens (WU Global Tax Policy Center at the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law) Antoine Vauchez, European Center of Sociology and and Pasquale Pistone (WU Vienna University of Economics and Business Political Science and Salerno University), April Scientific Co-ordinator, High- Development Policies, Giorgia Giovannetti (University of Florence and Level Policy Seminar “Courts, Social Change and Judicial EUI), April Independence”, 16-17 March 2012 What Policies are Needed to Turn Cultural Diversity into an Asset for Socio-Economic Development?, Anna Triandafyllidou (EUI), May Climate Governance, Denny Ellerman (EUI), May “It was an excellent The Middle East in the Global Architecture of Nuclear Governance, opportunity to Grégoire Mallard (Northwest University), June discuss and present transformational ideas Gender Quotas at the Global Level: Towards Parity Governance?, with a group of high- Ruth Rubio Marín (EUI) and Eléonore Lépinard (Université de Montreal), November level participants. With President Barroso as an active participant it included a political leader in a position to push for their implementation.”

Mattias Kumm, New York University, GGP Director Scientific Co-ordinator, High- Maduro and EC President Barroso. Level Policy Seminar “The The Democratic Democratic Governance of the Governance of the Euro” 10 May 2012 Euro, 10 May 2012

33 The Global Governance Programme TRAINING THE ACADEMY OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

The Academy of Global Gov- makers, diplomats, international “Very well organised, ernance (AGG) offers a unique organisations and public sector covering present themes executive training programme officials, executives, and junior through a well-combined and an opportunity for policy- academics to exchange experi- method: high-level ences, challenge assumptions speakers + high-level participants = good and advance innovative and cre- “A rare opportunity to level of interactivity.” take a step back and ative solutions to topical issues to compare approaches, relating to governance. Ana Catarina Mendes Leal challenges and aspirations The AGG equips trainees with (Ministry of National Defence, Portugal) across world regions. the skills to pursue and advance a Thoroughly enjoyable and career in EU institutions, nation- synergies and networks among intellectually rewarding.” al governments, international experts working in diverse con- Andreas Unterstaller (European organisations and business, and texts and coming from the dif- Commission) facilitates the development of ferent corners of the world.

From Tax Havens to International Tax Coordination a Focus on Developing Countries, 2-5 May 2012

34 The Global Governance Programme “The AGG Executive Seminar has been a profoundly thought- provoking experience. Its high intellectual level and truly global approach make it particularly relevant to participants from all EU institutions.”

Joel Schuyer (European External Action Service)

“A very interesting experience characterised by a high level debate and inspiring issues.”

Marinella Davide (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

35 The Global Governance Programme 2012 Executive Participants 18% by Institutions 29% 10% ■ EU Institutions ■ International Organisations (UN, WTO, OCSE) 21% 22% ■ National Governments, Governament Agencies ■ Diplomats ■ Private Sector

In the past year, the Academy tion in Latin America and Asia; cultural pluralism, gender equal- trained over two hundred aca- EU Foreign Policy; the WTO Dis- ity, the governance of the atom, demics and professionals, who pute Settlement System; Develop- and the transnational and interna- benefited from a network of aca- ment Finance and the Governance tional character of litigation. The demics and international top-level of Aid; the Governance of the In- Academy also announces second officials, and from stimulating formation Society, and the Regu- and third editions of executive- discussions on: International Tax lation of the Internet. training seminars which build on Co-ordination with a focus on De- In 2013, the number of executive an expanding network of lead- veloping Countries; Climate Gov- training seminars increases from ing academics and experts in the ernance Issues and Institutions; eight to twelve. The Academy fields of development, climate Political Participation in a Glo- hosts first edition executive-train- governance, tax policy, interna- balised World; Regional Integra- ing seminars on key issues such as: tional trade, and regionalism.

Issues in Development Policies Development Finance and the Governance of Aid, 21-23 November 2012

36 The Global Governance Programme Executive Training Seminars in 2013

Standard-Setting in Application Scientific Coordinator International Trade Deadline Petros C. Mavroidis 18-20 February 2013 20 January Director GGP Research Strand “International 2013 Trade Observatory”

The Executive-Training Seminar focuses on techni- trade, and their legal relevance at the WTO. The cal barriers to trade (TBT): following a silence of aim is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the nine years, in 2012, the WTO adjudicated three standardisation process (focusing on the political TBT disputes. A host of world-famous experts dis- economy of the process before institutions such as cusses the political economy of the standardising the ISO-IEC), and a critical evaluation of the WTO process, the impact of standards on international practice in this area.

Multi-lateralism and the Shift Application Scientific Coordinators towards Global Tax Governance Deadline Ana Paula Dourado (University of Lisbon) and Fiscal Transparency 24 March Jeffrey Owens (WU Global Tax Policy Center at 23-25 April 2013 2013 the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law and Director Research Project “Governance: Exploring The Tax Dimension”) This Executive-Training Seminar follows the suc- Pasquale Pistone (WU Vienna University and cessful 2011 and 2012 editions. The Academy of Salerno University) Global Governance and the WUVienna University of Economics and Business have created an on-going programme on global tax governance and fiscal gional organisations; the changing role of business transparency, and this year’s executive-training semi- and civil society; the recent EU proposals on tax and nar brings together top speakers from academia, in- governance; improving international co-operation to ternational institutions, business, and civil society counter offshore non-compliance; the protection of to discuss the changing role of multi-lateral and re- the taxpayer in a more transparent environment.

Ana Paula Dourado is professor of Tax Law and International and European Tax Law at the Uni- versity of Lisbon, and Vice-President of the Institute for Economic, Fiscal and Tax Law. She has been visiting professor at the University of Leiden since 2007 (International Tax Centre), at the University of Florida in 2010 (Global Law School), at the Catholic University in Lisbon since 2009, at University of Vi- enna between 2010 and 2011, and is currently at University of Neuchâtel from 2012 until 2013. She drafted and negotiated the tax reforms in Portuguese-speaking countries as an expert in the legal department of the International Monetary Fund from 2003 to 2009. She was a member of the Centre for Tax Studies at the Portuguese Ministry of Finance and a delegate for Portugal in the working groups for direct tax harmonisation at the European Community and in the Working Group for Tax Avoidance and Evasion at

37 The Global Governance Programme the OECD. She is a founding member of the Group for Research on European and International Taxation (GREIT), and organiser of the Lisbon Seminars on European and International Tax Law and of the GREIT Lisbon Summer Course. Pasquale Pistone holds the Ad Personam Jean Monnet Chair on European Tax Law and Policy at the Vienna University of Economics and Business; he is associate professor of Tax Law at the University of Salerno in Italy; in 2010, he was visiting professor at the Schools of Law of the University of Melbourne and Monash University in Australia, at the University of Lisbon and Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas. He is member of the Junge Kurie of the Austrian Academy of Sciences and member of the editorial board of Intertax, The World Tax Journal, Diritto e Pratica Tributaria Internazionale and of other distinguished international tax journals. He is author and editor of numerous publications on European and international tax law, published in several languages worldwide.

Cultural Diversity: Advantage Application Scientific Coordinator or Liability? Deadline Anna Triandafyllidou 6-8 May 2013 1 March Director GGP Research Strand “Cultural 2013 Pluralism: The Driver for Social Innovation”

In an increasingly globalised world faced with an in- ecutive training seminar is to mainstream the topic of ternational financial crisis, cultural diversity runs the cultural diversity across a variety of disciplines (law, risk of being seen as an additional “burden” that so- sociology, political science) and engage in a dialogue cieties have to “carry” and it is sometimes even called on whether it is a “disadvantage” that societies have to into question why cultural diversity should be accom- bear, or whether it actually offers a competitive edge modated or respected at all. The purpose of this ex- in different areas of socio-economic activity.

Climate Governance: Issues and Application Scientific Coordinator Institutions Deadline Denny Ellerman 20-22 May 2013 21 April Director GGP Research Strand “Global 2013 Governance: Institution-building and the EU”

Climate change is on the policy agenda for most underpinnings of climate change and the implica- nations and it presents problems which are dis- tions for policy, choosing appropriate policies in tinctly different from other policy issues which a multi-national context, the current development require attention. This intensive three-day ex- of institutions to address climate change concerns, ecutive-training seminar provides an introduc- the intersection with trade law, how to allocate tion to the issues raised by climate change and the burden equitably on a global scale, and what the institutions that have evolved to deal with it. lessons to draw from the EU Emission Trading Separate three-hour sessions address the scientific System (ETS).

38 The Global Governance Programme How Judges Think in a Application Scientific Coordinator Globalised World - Does Deadline Miguel Poiares Maduro Globalisation Change Judicial April 2013 Director of the GGP and of the “Modes of Global Reasoning and Adjudication? Governance” Research Strand May 2013

The purpose of this executive training seminar is to nar also engages with the issue of judicial dialogues examine the different facets of the role of judges as and the forms that these may take in the context of deliberators and interpreters of the law, with a focus the increased transnational and international char- on how they are impacted upon globalisation. The acter of litigation. It also reviews classic dimensions different sessions review the impact of globalisa- of the role of judges, such as the nature and exercise tion on the character and volume of litigation, but of balancing, or the different methods of legal inter- also on how judges may need to adapt their forms pretation and judicial deliberation. The executive of judicial reasoning and may, in fact, already be training seminar is targeted at judges and practic- doing so. In addition, the executive-training semi- ing lawyers.

Global, Regional and National Application Scientific Coordinator Actors in the Governance of the Deadline Grégoire Mallard Atom: a Focus on Europe and 12 May 2013 (Northwestern University) the Middle East 11-13 June 2013

This executive training seminar brings together tween rules-adoption and rules-enforcement often scholars, practitioners and diplomats from the Unit- observed at state level. The topics covered extend to ed States, the European Union and the Middle East the role of the EU in nuclear non-proliferation, nu- to assess the role of global, regional and national ac- clear safety, nuclear materials security and economic tors in the regulation of nuclear trade and produc- security related to the nuclear fuel cycle. The execu- tion. Trainees are engaged in a debate which aims to tive training seminar also analyses the role of the investigate whether, and, if so, how regional actors EU as a leading actor in the creation, adaptation and can complement the work of global agencies (such as enforcement of global rules affecting nuclear trade the International Atomic Energy Agency) as norm- (both in Europe and beyond) and the lessons that can producers, innovators and diffusers of best practices, be drawn from the EU experience for other regions, and whether regional actors can close the gap be- particularly, the Middle East.

Grégoire Mallard obtained his Ph.D. at Princeton University in 2008 and is Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University. He is completing his book “Fallout: The Rules of the Nuclear Nonproliferation in an Age of Global Fracture,” and he is starting a new project on reparation treaties and the politics of sovereign-debt cancellation. He co-edited “Global Science and National Sover- eignty: Studies in Historical Sociology of Science”, (London: Routledge, 2009), and has published articles mainly on the hermeneutics of treaties and other legal and literary texts. He was Jean Monnet/GGP fellow in the academic year 2011-2012.

39 The Global Governance Programme Comparing Regional Integration Application Scientific Coordinator Institutions: America, Africa, Deadline Carlos Juan Closa Montero and Asia 4 (Institute for Public Goods and Policies – CSIC) 2-4 October 2013 September 2013

“Integration” has multiple meanings for different ac- creations, tailor-made to suit specific national realities tors in diverse contexts. Whilst the EU has been the and international contexts. Thus, the purpose of this pioneer and, usually, the paradigm, actors in other executive-training seminar is to discuss integration schemes and areas challenge the validity of refer- schemes upon the basis of their own merits, their own ring to a “model”, either to model their own instru- goals and their own achievements. Specifically, it fo- ments and/or to evaluate achievements. Rather, the cuses on integration in America, Africa, and Asia and argument is made that integration schemes are ad hoc the most significant integration schemes in each area.

Carlos Juan Closa Montero is Professor at the Institute for Public Goods and Policies - CSIC - and affiliated scholar to the Global Governance Programme. Between 2004 and 2008, he was Deputy Director of the Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales (Ministry of the President of the Spanish Government). Between 2005 and 2009, he was member of the Venice Commission for Democracy through Law (Council of Europe) representing Spain. Formerly he has been professor at the University of Zaragoza, Complutense (Madrid) and visiting professor at the College of Europe. He has taught at the Instituto Uni- versitario Ortega y Gasset, in Madrid since 1999. He was also visiting fellow at the Minda de Gunzburg Centre of Harvard University (2002); Jean Monnet Fellow (1995-1996) and Salvador de Madariaga Fellow (2004) at the EUI, and Senior Emile Noel Fellow at the Jean Monnet Center, NYU. He has published a large number of articles in peer reviewed journals, in English, Spanish, French and Italian, on EU citizenship, the EU constitutional structure, Europeanisation and the EU relation with the Member States. He is currently involved in a project co-ordinated by Joseph H.H. Weiler on Comparative Regional Integration.

European Union and Global Application Scientific Coordinator Governance Deadline Nuno Severiano Teixeira 9-11 October 2013 9 (Nova University of Lisbon) September 2013

The executive training seminar focuses on Europe- the relationship of the EU with diverse international an Union and Global Governance. In the first part, institutions and international regimes of global gov- speakers address the context of EU external rela- ernance at economic, financial, political and security tions: the debate on the international identity and the levels: UN; WTO; IMF; non-proliferation etc. Ses- structure and functioning of the institutions of exter- sions close with a reflection and debate on the EU´s nal representation of the EU. The second part covers future as a global player.

Nuno Severiano Teixeira is Professor of International Relations at the NOVA University in Lis- bon. He has served as Minister of Interior (2000-2002) and Minister of National Defense (2006-2009) of the Portuguese Government. He was visiting professor at Georgetown University in 2000, visiting scholar at the Institute for European Studies, University of California, Berkeley in 2004, and senior visiting scholar at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (EUI). He has published extensively on the history of international relations and history of European integration, security and defense studies.

40 The Global Governance Programme Global Value Chains: Policy Application Scientific Coordinator Implications and Opportunities Deadline Bernard Hoekman 21-23 October 2013 23 Director GGP Research Strand “Global September Economics: Multilateral Co-operation and Policy 2013 Spill-overs”

This executive training seminar provides partici- are leading academics and experienced practition- pants with a synthesis of recent developments in - ers, and the focus of their sessions is on: progress and research on - the organisation of global produc- in measuring trade flows (“value added trade” and tion and trade, and the design of economic policies the “servitisation” of industry); the determinants of to enhance firm competitiveness and the value-add- firm-level productivity performance; policies for ed content of production. The rise of global supply value addition and upgrading; the implications for chains and networks has important consequences international co-operation and the design of trade for economic development strategies. The speakers agreements and development assistance.

Role of Foreign Direct Application Scientific Coordinator Investments for Development: Deadline Giorgia Giovannetti Legal, Social and Economic 8 October Director GGP Research Strand “Development: Aspects 2013 Emerging Markets and International Cooperation” 6-8 November 2013

The executive training seminar introduces partici- ability of foreign investment. The executive train- pants to the role of foreign direct investments (FDI) ing seminar adopts a multi-disciplinary perspective and of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in terms which offers a combination of presentations, case of economic and social development in poor coun- studies and best practices. Participants improve tries. Particular attention is paid to domestic and their understanding of the channels of transmission international policies ruling the role of MNEs in the of FDI on the local economy and on the local soci- host market, to new forms of private-public partner- ety, their regulatory framework and policies which ship (PPP) between foreign and domestic enterpris- maximise host country attractiveness and competi- es, as well as to issues related to the Corporate Social tiveness in order to enhance the long-term develop- Responsibility (CSR) of companies and the sustain- mental impact of foreign investments.

The Anatomy of EU Foreign Policy, 10-12 October 2012

41 The Global Governance Programme Gender Quotas at Global Level: Application Scientific Coordinators Towards Parity Governance? Deadline Ruth Rubio-Marín 19-21 November 2013 19 October (EUI) 2013 Eléonore Lépinard (Université de Montreal)

There is a global trend towards the endorsement tional and local initiatives in their efforts to advance of gender quotas in political and economic deci- the agenda for the empowerment of women. This sion-making structures, which raises the question executive training seminar is intended not only to of gender parity as a global governance aspiration. provide a systematic and comparative perspective International and regional organisations that have on the promotion, adoption and implementation of endorsed the use of gender quotas include: the gender quotas in political and economic structures UN, the ILO, the OECD, the European Union, the throughout the world, but also, and more impor- Council of Europe and the Organization of Ameri- tantly, to discuss their underlying logic, expected can States. Moreover, these global and regional in- effects, and conceptual contributions to widespread stitutions appear to be increasingly co-ordinating understandings of equality, democracy and global amongst themselves and also linking up with na- governance.

Ruth Rubio-Marín holds a chair in Comparative Public Law at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Formerly, she was Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Seville, Spain, and a member of the Faculty of The Hauser Global Law School Program at New York University. Her academic interests include comparative constitutional law, transitional justice, human rights, immigration, minority rights and feminist theory. She is the author, editor and co-editor of several books including, Immigration as a Democratic Challenge, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000); The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); What Hap- pened to the Women? Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations (Social Science Research Coun- cil, New York: Colombia University Press, 2006); The Gender of Reparations: Subverting Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009) and The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe, (Leiden: Brill, 2012). Eléonore Lépinard is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Université de Montréal. Her research focuses on gender quotas, multi-culturalism, inter-sectionality, social movements, socio-legal studies and feminist theory. She has worked for several European comparative research projects on gender equality and on multi-culturalism, and has been an expert in the network on European Women’s Rights. She is the author of several articles, including prize-wining papers, on gender quotas and minorities' political inclusion, as well as a monograph on the French constitutional reform for gender parity, entitled, L'égalité introuvable: La parité, les féministes et la République, (Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 2007).

42 The Global Governance Programme Being at the Heart of the Global Governance Debate

GLOBAL THINKERS AND ACTORS AT THE GGP

The GGP convenes prominent speakers – academ- on institutional corruption, Vaira Vike-Freiberga ics, executives, policy-makers – to promote real (former President of Latvia) on EU foreign policy, exchanges and synergies between the worlds of re- Ben Hammersley (European Commission High- search and policy. A number of events are organised Level group on Freedom and Pluralism of the Media) in collaboration with international organisations, on emerging forms of political participation, Thomas global think-tanks and networks, as well as universi- C. Heller (Climate Policy Initiative) and Christian de ties and academic institutes. Perthuis (University of Paris-Dauphine) on climate The GGP workshops, lectures and debates contribute change and its implications, Ben Wildavsky (Kauff- to the goal of investigating and offering innovative man Foundation) on the societal impact of higher insights and thought-provocative perspectives on education, Kamal Saggi (Vanderbilt University) on global issues, often resulting in publications. the evolution of preferential trade agreements, Eyal Over the past year, key academics and experts came Benvenisti (Tel Aviv University) and Andreas Zim- to the GGP to share their views on global governance mermann (University of Potsdam) on the interaction issues, such as Lawrence Lessig (Harvard University) of law within historical specific contexts.

Podcasts, video and audio are available on the GGP website

Global Higher Education: The Future of Ideas, 19-20 November 2012

43 The Global Governance Programme In addition to the High-Level Policy Seminars, the Executive Training Seminars, the debates and lectures, the 2013 GGP calendar of events includes:

High-Level Workshop, The Object and Methodology of Global Governance, Eric Brousseau (University of Paris-Dauphine and EUI), Carlos Juan Closa Montero (Institute for Public Goods and Policies – CSIC) and Miguel Poiares Maduro (EUI), 24-26 January 2013 Workshop, Lessons from the Euro for Global Governance, Harold James (Princeton University), 28 January 2013 Workshop, FAO Challenges and Opportunities, Giorgia Giovannetti (EUI and University of Florence) in collaboration with the Centre for Global Development, March 2013 Conference, From the League of Nations to the United Nations: New Approaches to International Institutions, Simon Jackson (MWF EUI) and Anatara Haldar (EUI), 21-22 March, 2013 Workshop, Transnational Entrepreneurship, Anna Triandafyllidou (EUI), 24 April 2013 Workshop, The ICJ’s 2012 Judicial Year in Review, Andreas Zimmerman (Potsdam University) and Eyal Benvenisti (Tel Aviv University), 25-26 April 2013 Workshop, A Comparative Institutional Framework for Global Governance Analysis, Neil Komesar (Wisconsin University), May 2013 Workshop, The Power of Legality: Practices of the International Law and their Politics, Nikolas M. Rajkovic (EUI), 27-28 May 2013 Summer School, Young Scholars Lab, Joseph H.H. Weiler (New York University) and Miguel Poiares Maduro (EUI), first week of June 2013 Workshop, Exploring the Transnational Circulation of Policy Paradigms. Law Firms, Legal Networks and the Production of Expertise in the Field of Competition Policies, Antoine Vauchez (European Center of Sociology and Political Science at the Sorbonne - CESSP), June 2013 Workshop, Reflexive Regulation: Regulation in a Multi-level and Multi-mode Perspective, Eric Brousseau (University of Paris-Dauphine and EUI), and Jean-Michel Glachant (EUI), September 2013

THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME NETWORK

The GGP Network is an e-knowledge community, of hosted discussion threads on a variety of topics such individuals and institutions, which aims to facilitate as: global administrative law, climate and sustaina- knowledge-sharing and debate on global governance bility, regional integration, cultural diversity, and the issues. With over 240 members - global governance Euro governance. scholars, researchers, Ph.D. students, policy experts, To join the discussions, subscribe to the GGP Network institutions – and subscribers, in 2012, the Network at: http://network.globalgovernanceprogramme.eu

44 The Global Governance Programme GGP Publications

Sharing Knowledge and Inspiring Change

The GGP can rely on a regular and increasing pro- Over the first three years, the GGP publications duction of research and policy publications through have covered topics as diverse as EU and US coun- its research community and worldwide network of ter-terrorism policies, trade policy strategies, the academics and policy-makers from other interna- financial crisis, the euro governance, regional inte- tionally recognised institutions. gration and governance, global tax governance, the The GGP Working Papers - original research-based crisis of democracy, and climate justice. The nu- papers, which fully comply with international aca- merous authors who have contributed their knowl- demic standards and are peer-reviewed - and Policy edge and expertise to date include: Sabino Cassese Papers - primarily oriented towards policy discus- (Italian Constitutional Court), Christopher Hill sions and proposals on legitimate contemporary (University of Cambridge), Harold James (Prince- policy – are published respectively in the Robert ton University), Charles A. Kupchan (Georgetown Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working University), Lawrence Lessig (Harvard University), Papers and in the Policy Papers Series. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (EUI), Allan Rosas (Eu- The GGP further contributes to the serial publica- ropean Court of Justice), Olivier Roy (EUI), Martin tions of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Scheinin (first UN Special Rapporteur on the Pro- Studies Centre, specifically in the RSCAS Research motion and Protection of Human Rights and Fun- Reports, with its Policy Briefs published in the damental Freedoms while countering Terrorism), light of the High-Level Policy Seminars. The Policy Dusan Sidjanski (Special Adviser to the President Briefs concisely frame the issue object of the debate of the European Commission), and Nuno Severi- among academics and policy-makers. and present ano Teixeira (Nova University of Lisbon and for- policy options and recommendations. mer Minister of Defence of Portugal).

All publications are available on the GGP website

45 The Global Governance Programme Working Papers

Institutional Corruptions, Lawrence Lessig Europe and the Mediterranean: When Obsession for Security Misses the Real World, Olivier Roy The Dominance of Climate Change in Environmental Law: Taking Stock for Rio+20, Stephen Humphries, Emerging Normative Frameworks on Transnational Karen Morrow and Christina Voigt Human Rights Obligations, Wouter Vandenhole Choosing between the UN and OECD Tax Policy The Impact of China on Manufacturing Exports of Models: An African Case Study, Veronika Dauer and Italy and Germany, Giorgia Giovannetti, Marco Richard Krever Sanfilippo and Margherita Velucchi Personalization and the Future of News, Matthew Taxing Hidden Wealth: Lessons for Policy Making, Hindman Niels Johannesen Instrument Choice and Replication, Christina Voigt Do Chinese SOEs and Private Companies Differ in TheirF oreign Location Strategies? Alessia Amighini, A Problem Concerning Proportional Representation: Roberta Rabellotti and Marco Sanfilippo Constitutional Politics and the Crisis of Democratic Legitimacy, Daniel Markovits A Volatility-based Theory of Fiscal Union Formation, Jaime Luque, Massimo Morelli and José Tavares The Fabric of International Jurisprudence: An Interdisciplinary Encounter, Antoine Vauchez, Iyiola Multilevel Governance of Interdependent Public Solanké, Cristina Dallara, Bilyana Petkova, Jérome Goods: Theories, Rules and Institutions for the Porta and Bas van Bockel Central Policy Challenge in the 21st Century, Ernst- Ulrich Petersmann Ecological Debt and Historical Responsibility Revisited – The case of climate change, Olivier Legal Obligation in the Global Context: Some Godard Remarks on the Boundaries and Allegiances among Persons beyond the State, George Pavlakos Politics after Indignation. Possibilities and Limits of Direct Democracy, Daniel Innerarity With which Countries do Tax Havens Share Information?, Katarzyna Bilicka and Clemens Fuest The Choice to Protect. Rethinking Responsibility for Humanitarian Intervention, Neomi Rao Post-liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR, José Antonio Sanahuja The Global Reach of the Proposed EU Financial Transaction Tax Directive: Creating Momentum European Defence: Past Legacy, Present Changes, through Internal Legislation?, Bart Van Vooren Future Challenges, Nuno Severiano Teixeira Global Administrative Law: An Italian Perspective, MERCOSUR as a Regional and Global Protagonist, Sabino Cassese, Stefano Battini, Elisa D’Alterio, Félix Peña Giulio Napolitano, Maurizia De Bellis, Hilde Caroli Casavola, Elisabetta Morlino, Lorenzo Casini, Climate Justice, between Global and International Edoardo Chiti and Mario Savino Justice - Insights from Justification Theory, Olivier Godard Global Security Challenges for Europe: Structural and Strategic Changes in Energy Markets and Major What is Systemic Risk and What can be Done about Implications, António Costa Silva It? A Legal Perspective, Joanna Gray

46 The Global Governance Programme Policy Policy Papers Briefs

TheEU Position in Taxation and Development, The Euro Crisis and the Democratic Governance of Andrea Mogni the Euro: Legal and Political Issues of a Fiscal Crisis, Johanna Croon and Miguel Poiares Maduro European Defence: Challenges after the Treaty of Lisbon, Nuno Severiano Teixeira Courts, Social Changes and Judicial Independence, Cristina Dallara and Antoine Vauchez A New Governance for the European Union and the Euro: Democracy and Justice, Miguel Poiares Maduro What Next in a post-Doha World? – Lessons from EU, U.S., and Chinese Trade Policy Strategies, David A Public Choice View of IP(rizes), Saul Levmore Kleimann, Joe Guinan, and Andrew Small The Democratic Governance of the Euro, Miguel Poiares Maduro, Bruno De Witte and Mattias Kumm Courts, Social Change and Judicial Independence, Adriana Silvia Dreyzin de Klor, Miguel Poiares Maduro and Antoine Vauchez Rescue at Sea: Human Rights Obligations of States and Private Actors, with a Focus on the EU’s External Borders, Martin Scheinin, in collaboration with Ciaran Burke and Alexandre Skander Galand Trade Roundtable, Petros C. Mavroidis Is There a Legal Duty to Address World Poverty?, Margot E. Salomon The Governance Gap: Globalisation and the West, Charles A. Kupchan

GGP Newsletter

(June and December) Keep abreast of the latest news, publications and vid- eos, and have a preview of the GGP events and of the Academy of Global Governance Executive Training Seminars: subscribe to the GGP newsletter on our website.

47 The Global Governance Programme Our Team

Director

Luís Miguel Poiares Maduro Luís Miguel Poiares Maduro is the Director of the Global Governance Programme and Director of the research strand “Modes of Global Governance”. Since 2009, he holds the Joint Chair in European Law with the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and the Department of Law at the EUI. Former Advocate General at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg (2003-2009), he is the Co-director of the Acad- emy of International Trade and Investment Law of Macau. He has taught and teaches regularly at many institutions, including the College of Europe, Yale Law School, Universidade Católica de Lisboa, Univer- sidade Nova de Lisboa, London School of Economics, Chicago Law School, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales (Madrid) and Instituto Ortega y Gasset (Madrid). He was a Fulbright Visiting Research Scholar at Harvard Law School. He is a Doctor of Law from the EUI and was the first winner of the “Rowe and Maw Prize”, and winner of the “Prize Obiettivo Europa” for the best Ph.D. thesis at the EUI. In 2010, he was awarded the prestigious Gulkbenkian Science Prize for his outstanding work in the field of law. He has also been honoured by the President of the Portuguese Republic with the Order of Sant’Iago da Espada for literary, scientific and artistic merit (2006). He is the author of We the Court -The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998). Recent publications include, The Past and Future of EU Law (co-edited with Loic Azoulai, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009) and A Constituição Plural – Constitucionalismo e União Europeia, (Lisbon: Principia, 2006).

Research Strand Director Bernard Hoekman Bernard Hoekman is the Director of the research strand “Global Economics”. He has held various senior positions at the World Bank, including Director of the International Trade Department and Research Manager in the Development Research Group. He has also worked as an economist in the GATT Secretariat and held visiting appointments at SciencesPo. He has published widely on trade policy and development, the global trading system, and trade in services. He is a graduate of the Erasmus University Rotterdam, holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan and is a research fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. His most recent book is The Political Economy of the World Trading System, (Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 3rd edition, 2009, co-authored with M. Kostecki).

48 The Global Governance Programme Research Strand Director Denny Ellerman Denny Ellerman is the Director of the research strand “Climate Governance”. Formerly, a senior lecturer at the MIT’s Sloan School of Management, for many years he was Executive Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. He is an internationally recognised expert on energy and environmental economics with a particular focus on climate policy, emissions trading, and interactions with energy markets. Denny Ellerman spent eighteen years in Washington DC, working for the US Government (primarily the Department of Energy and its predecessors), the National Coal Association, and Charles River Associates, an economic consulting firm. In 1990, he was President of the International Association for Energy Economics.

Research Strand Director Giorgia Giovannetti Giorgia Giovannetti is the Director of the research strand “Development”. Professor of Economics at the University of Florence, she is also a part-time Professor at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (EUI), where she has acted as Principal Investigator for the First and Second European Report on Develop- ment (for the European Commission and seven Member States, October 2008-March 2011). She has been a visiting professor at Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona), the Hoover Institution (Stanford), New York University (New York and Florence campuses). She has worked extensively on development issues (social protection and countries in situations of fragility in sub-Saharan Africa, foreign direct investments and growth), on the link between trade and foreign direct investments in developed, as well as developing and emerging countries, on international economic policy and on the dynamics of firms. She directed the Re- search Centre of the Italian Trade Institute for two years (2005-2007), was an advisor to the ITI’s President (2003-2011), to the Minister of External Trade (2005-2009) and to the Italian Treasury (1999-2003).

Research Strand Director Petros C. Mavroidis Petros C. Mavroidis is the Director of the research strand “International Trade Observatory”. He is Edwin B. Parker Professor of Law at Columbia Law School in New York, on leave at the EUI. He was Chief-reporter at the American Law Institute project on ‘The Law and Economics of the WTO’. He has published in the law and economics of international trade organization, and is advising developing countries at the WTO.

49 The Global Governance Programme Research Strand Director Anna Triandafyllidou Anna Triandafyllidou is the Director of the research strand “Cultural Pluralism”. She was senior fellow at the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) in Athens from 2004 to 2012, where she headed a strong migration research team. She has also been a visiting professor at the College of Europe in Bruges since 2002. Professor Triandafyllidou received her Ph.D. from the EUI in 1995 and held teaching and research positions at the University of Surrey (1994-95), the London School of Economics (1995-97), the CNR in Rome (1997-99), and the EUI (1999-2004). She was a Fulbright Scholar in Residence at New York University in 2011, and a Colston Fellow at the University of Bristol (2001-2002). She is currently on long-term leave from the Democritus University of Thrace, in Greece, where she is Assistant Professor. Her main areas of research and teaching are cultural diversity, migration, and nationalism from a European and international perspective. For the last 10 years, she has received funding and co-ordinated a number of international research projects in these research areas. Her publications include more than 100 articles in refereed journals and chapters in collective volumes, five authored books and more than ten edited and co-edited volumes.

Research Project Director Nehal Bhuta Nehal Bhuta is Professor of Public International Law at the EUI. He previously taught at the New School for Social Research and at the University of Toronto. His scholarship ranges from human- rights law, humanitarian law and international criminal law, to social and political theory and the history and theory of international law. He is a member of the board of editors of the European Journal of International Law, the Journal of International Criminal Justice, Constellations and Humanity. He has also previously worked as a researcher for Human Rights Watch and for the International Center for Transitional Justice.

Research Project Director Jeffrey Owens Jeffrey Owens is the Director of the WU Global Tax Policy Centre. He completed his doctoral work at Cam- bridge University in the United Kingdom in 1973. He continued an academic career (visiting professor at the American University of Paris, the Bocconi University, Milan, and Queen Mary's College, London) alongside his career as an International Civil Servant. He has focused his attention on questions of tax policy and

50 The Global Governance Programme tax administration, with particular emphasis on international taxation and related domestic issues. He has established a major taxation programme at the OECD and extensively developed the OECD contacts with non-member countries. His earlier work dealt with the development of international currency markets and the implications for monetary policies. He has made numerous contributions to professional journals, has published a number of books and has been the author of many OECD publications on taxation. Jeffrey's position at the OECD and his frequent participation in international conferences have provided him with a unique international perspective on tax policy.

Research Project Director Martin Scheinin Martin Scheinin is Professor of International Law and Human Rights at the Law Department of the EUI. From 2005 to 2011, he served as United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism. Prior to that, in 1997-2004, he was a member of the Human Rights Committee, the treaty monitoring body under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Before joining the EUI, he was Armfelt Professor of Constitu- tional and International Law and Director of the Institute for Human Rights at Åbo Akademi University, Turku (1998-2008). During this time, he established and directed the Finnish Graduate School in Human Rights Research and the Nordic Network in Human Rights Research. He has taught courses at a number of universities, including the University of Toronto (Canada), the University of Pretoria (South Africa), the American University (Washington DC, USA), the University of Melbourne (Australia), the University of Tartu (Estonia), University of Tromsø (Norway), the Cardozo Law School (New York) and the St. Thomas University (Miami).

Research Project Director Gaby Umbach Gaby Umbach is the Director of the reserch projects “Globalisation Database” and “Global Governance by Indicators”. She holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Cologne, where she is Senior Research Associate of the Jean Monnet Chair for Political Science and the Seminar for Social Policy (on leave at the EUI). In both positions, she researches on and teaches European integration issues and on the functioning of the European Union. Over the past 12 years, she has been engaged in 14 international research projects on various academic topics. Her fields of expertise include research and publications on European integration and integration theories; Europeanisation studies and multi-level governance; em- ployment and socio-economic policies, as well as policy co-ordination; environmental and climate change policies; EU constitutionalisation and institutionalisation; EU enlargement and system transformation as well as curricula development in EU studies. Her current academic work targets the global governance level and focuses on sustainable development; global policy crisis; global institutional crisis reactions and international relations.

51 The Global Governance Programme Academic Staff

Laura Bartolini Laura Bartolini holds a MSc degree in Development Economics from the University of Florence and is en- rolled in a Master's Programme in Public Policy and Social Change at the Collegio Carlo Alberto (Turin). Her research interests concern human rights and the economic effects of migration control and management, with a focus on Europe. She has worked in various NGOs and consultancies on development and migration issues in Italy and Spain, developing a practical knowledge on migration regulation and integration, European project administration and statistical data management. She joined the GGP as a project assistant for the Globalisation Database in December 2011. Academic Staff

Tatjana Evas Tatjana Evas holds a Ph.D. in law (summa cum laude, 2011 Bremer Studienpreis award) from University of Bremen, Germany; LL.M in European Union and Public International law (with distinction) from Riga Gradu- ate School of Law, Latvia and LL.B from Concordia International University Estonia. Previously, she was a researcher at the University of Hamburg and University of Bremen and research fellow at Columbia Law School (New York) and the Centre for Policy Studies (Budapest). In addition to academic research work and teaching on EU law, she serves as a legal expert for the EU and UN agencies. Recent publications include the monograph Judicial Application of European Union Law in Post-communist Countries (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2012). Academic Staff

Marco Sanfilippo Marco Sanfilippo holds a Ph.D. in Politics and Economics of Developing Countries from the University of Florence. He worked at the RSCAS as a research assistant for the first two editions of the European Report on Development. He has also worked for UNIDO, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, University of Eastern Pied- mont, Fondazione RES, and has been a consultant at the Center for the Study of Contemporary China, and at UNICEF. He is author of articles on issues related to international and development economics published in international refereed journals and books, in English and in Italian. Academic Staff

Iryna Ulasiuk Iryna Ulasiuk, received a Ph.D. in law from the EUI. She also holds degrees in linguistics and law from Minsk State Linguistic University (Belarus) and International Institute of Economics and Law (Russia), a Master of

52 The Global Governance Programme Research in Law from the EUI and a Master of European Law from Stockholm University. Her fields of specialisation include legal and political management of cultural diversity, minority and migrant rights policy and law (particularly language policy and law), citizenship policies and laws. Programme Staff Secretary To the ggp Sara Bini Sara Bini joined the EUI in 2011 as an intern in the Conference Unit of the RSCAS. She moved to the Global Governance Programme as administrative assistant in September 2012. Before joining the EUI, she worked for five years as credit analyst in an international consumer bank. She studied Law at the University of Flor- ence and wrote her thesis on International Law. Programme Staff Outreach Coordinator Eleonora Carcascio Eleonora Carcascio holds a Master’s Degree in Public Management from the Bocconi University and graduated in Political Sciences-International Relations. She is specialised in marketing and communications and worked for more than five years as PR and media officer in the UN system (UNICRI and IFAD). Previously, she worked in the private sector as media-relations consultant and event organizer. In 2010, she joined the GGP of the RSCAS as Outreach Co-ordinator. Programme Staff Research Strands Coordinator Silvia Dell’Acqua Silvia Dell’Acqua holds a MSc in European Politics and Governance from the London School of Economics and graduated in International and Diplomatic Studies at the University of Trieste. She worked for more than six years in research and communications at the Lifelong Learning Programme Agency of the Italian Minis- try of Education. Before joining the GGP in 2011, as Co-ordinator of the Academy, she worked in the field of international migration, as Outreaching and Networking Co-ordinator for the CARIM Project of the RSCAS. Programme Staff Secretary to the Director Angelika Lanfranchi-Conzelmann Angelika Lanfranchi-Conzelmann studied German Literature and Civilisation at the University of Montpel- lier, where she obtained a Master's Degree and the French National Teaching Certificate (CAPES). She later worked at the EUI as research assistant for the Academy of European Law (1988-95) before taking a teaching position in a secondary school in England. She returned to the EUI in 1999, and worked in the Academic Service before joining the RSCAS in 2001, first as a secretary and later as the personal assistant of the Director.

53 The Global Governance Programme Programme Staff Executive Programme Manager Ingo Linsenmann Ingo Linsenmann, MA, studied Political Sciences at the Universities of Cologne and Newcastle upon Tyne and has worked for the International Young European Federalists (JEF) in Brussels and Bonn for several years. Between 1999 and 2004, he was a research fellow and Project Manager at the Jean Monnet Chair for Political Science, University of Cologne, where he was involved in several projects on European economic governance. He joined the RSCAS in the summer of 2004. Since then, he has worked as advisor for project applications to the European Institutions and as Project Manager/Director for numerous projects, including the NEWGOV Project (2004-2008), the PIREDEU Design Study (2008-2011), the ERD-Project (2008-2010), EUDO and related projects (2009-2013), the EUCITAC/ACIT Projects (2009-2013).

Programme Staff Academy Coordinator Tommaso Rooms Tommaso Rooms holds a MSc in Public Policy and Administration from the London School of Economics and studied Political Science and International Relations at the University of Florence. Prior to joining the GGP in March 2012, he worked for the World Bank as a Private Sector Development Consultant.

Programme Staff Secretary to the GGP Mia Saugman Mia Saugman holds a BA in Geography and Spanish as well as an MA in Intellectual History and the His- tory of Social and Political Thought, both obtained at Sussex University in the UK. She also studied at the Universidad de Salamanca in Spain as an Erasmus student. Before joining the GGP in September 2012, she had worked as European customer service representative at Genesys Conferencing in the UK, followed by a year and a half as an English language instructor to the Italian armed forces, and subsequently as secretary to various professors at the EUI.

Programme Staff Webmaster Francesca Scotto Francesca Scotto holds a post-graduate degree in Humanities Computing with a specialisation in “Graphics, Interactive and Virtual Environments” from the University of Pisa. Before joining the GGP as webmaster in May 2011, she worked for the computing unit of the University of Dresden.

54 The Global Governance Programme contacts

Global Governance Programme Villa Schifanoia Via Boccaccio 121 I-50133 Firenze – Italy Tel. +39 055 4685 973 Fax. +39 055 4685 458 [email protected] globalgovernanceprogramme.eui.eu

Villa La Pagliaiuola Via delle Palazzine 17/19 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) - Italy

Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Convento di San Domenico Via delle Fontanelle 19 I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) - Italy

European University Institute Badia Fiesolana Via dei Roccettini 9 I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) - Italy

The European Commission supports the EUI through the European Union budget. This publication reflects the views only of the author(s), and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. QM-AK-12-001-EN-N ISSN: 1977-8279 DOI: 10.2870/62128