Cell Theory the CELL THEORY GREW out of the WORK of MANY SCIENTISTS and IMPROVEMENTS in the MICROSCOPE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cell Theory the CELL THEORY GREW out of the WORK of MANY SCIENTISTS and IMPROVEMENTS in the MICROSCOPE Cell Theory THE CELL THEORY GREW OUT OF THE WORK OF MANY SCIENTISTS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE MICROSCOPE. Many scientists contributed to the cell theory. ROBERT HOOKE He was the first person to look at cells and named them. He looked at cork cells which are not living. It is the bark of a tree so they are dead plant cells. They are small squares and they reminded him of the small rooms in a monastery called cells ANTON VAN LEEUWENHOEK Credited with improving the microscope. (Zacharias Janssen is credited with discovering/creating microscope). Leeuwenhoek’s microscope could magnify 200x the human eye! Today’s microscopes can magnify up to 1500! MATTHIAS SCHLEIDEN was a German botanist (scientist who studies plants.) He found that the plant parts he examined were made of cells. He made the generalization that all plants were made of cells. THEODOR SCHWANN Studied animals. His microscopic investigations of animal parts led him to generalize that all animals are made of cells After looking at Schleiden’s work ,he further proposed that all organisms are made of cells. RUDOLF VIRCHOW- OMNIS CELLULA C CELLULA”: ALL CELLS FROM CELLS (1855) German doctor that said that new plant cells arise only from existing plant cells, and new animal cells arise only from existing animal cells. Building off the work of Redi (1668) who disproved the idea of spontaneous generation in his experiments about rotting meat. LOUIS PASTEUR-GERM THEORY 1856-Used the microscope to discover that tiny, one- celled (eukaryotic) yeast created alcoholic fermentation and that other one-celled, rod-shaped organisms (prokaryotic bacteria) caused beverages to spoil. Pasteur (1864) designed a flask experiment that disproved the idea of spontaneous generation once and for all! Ask me why I don’t have anthrax! images from “amoeba Mike” and Britannica Early studies led to the development of the cell theory. The Cell theory has three principles. 1) All organisms are made of cells. Early studies led to the development of the cell theory. The Cell theory has three principles. 1) All organisms are made of cells. 2) All existing cells are produced by other living cells. Early studies led to the development of the cell theory. The Cell theory has three principles. 1) All organisms are made of cells. 2) All existing cells are produced by other living cells. 3) The cell is the most basic unit of life. There are two cell types: eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells: Comparing cell types There are two cell types: eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells. Eukaryotic cells have a nucleus (true nucleus)which contains DNA that forms many chromosomes. nucleus cell membrane There are two cell types: eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells. Eukaryotic cells have a nucleus. Eukaryotic cells have membrane-bound nucleus organelles. organelles cell membrane There are two cell types: eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells. Prokaryotic cells do not have a nucleus. Prokaryotic cells do not nucleus have membrane-bound organelles, but they do have some organelles like ribosomes. organelles cell membrane cytoplasm There are two cell types: eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells. Prokaryotic cells do not have a nucleus, but they have one chromosome and “extra” circular pieces of DNA called “plasmids”. Draw a circular plasmid in your bottom cell diagram on your notes and label it “plasmid DNA”. EUKARYOTIC CELLS VS PROKARYOTIC BACTERIA CELLS Nucleus Organelles Eukaryotic DNA/Chromatin Cytoplasm Cell membrane Prokaryotic DNA/Chromatin Plasmid DNA Cytoplasm Cell membrane .
Recommended publications
  • The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE)
    270 4. Abstraction and Unification ∗ ∗ ∗ “O`uen ˆetes-vous? Que faites-vous? Il faut travailler” (on his death-bed, to his devoted pupils, watching over him). The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE) “Omne vivium ex Vivo.” (Latin proverb) Although the theory of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis) can be traced back at least to the Ionian school (600 B.C.), it was Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) who presented the most complete arguments for and the clearest statement of this theory. In his “On the Origin of Animals”, Aristotle states not only that animals originate from other similar animals, but also that living things do arise and always have arisen from lifeless matter. Aristotle’s theory of sponta- neous generation was adopted by the Romans and Neo-Platonic philosophers and, through them, by the early fathers of the Christian Church. With only minor modifications, these philosophers’ ideas on the origin of life, supported by the full force of Christian dogma, dominated the mind of mankind for more that 2000 years. According to this theory, a great variety of organisms could arise from lifeless matter. For example, worms, fireflies, and other insects arose from morning dew or from decaying slime and manure, and earthworms originated from soil, rainwater, and humus. Even higher forms of life could originate spontaneously according to Aristotle. Eels and other kinds of fish came from the wet ooze, sand, slime, and rotting seaweed; frogs and salamanders came from slime. 1846 CE 271 Rather than examining the claims of spontaneous generation more closely, Aristotle’s followers concerned themselves with the production of even more remarkable recipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Cell Cell History Cell Structures and Functions
    Introduction to the cell cell history cell structures and functions CK-12 Foundation December 16, 2009 CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright ©2009 CK-12 Foundation This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Contents 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 5 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells .................................. 5 3 www.ck12.org www.ck12.org 4 Chapter 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells Lesson Objectives • Identify the scientists that first observed cells. • Outline the importance of microscopes in the discovery of cells. • Summarize what the cell theory proposes. • Identify the limitations on cell size. • Identify the four parts common to all cells. • Compare prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Introduction Knowing the make up of cells and how cells work is necessary to all of the biological sciences. Learning about the similarities and differences between cell types is particularly important to the fields of cell biology and molecular biology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cell-Theory: a Restatement, History, and Critique Part III
    *57 The Cell-theory: A Restatement, History, and Critique Part III. The Cell as a Morphological Unit By JOHN R. BAKER (From the Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Oxford) SUMMARY A long time elapsed after the discovery of cells before they came to be generally regarded as morphological units. As a first step it was necessary to show that the cell-walls of plants were double and that cells could therefore be separated. The earliest advances in this direction were made by Treviranus (1805) and Link (1807). The idea of a cell was very imperfect, however, so long as attention was con- centrated on its wall. The first person who stated clearly that the cell-wall is not a necessary constituent was Leydig (1857). Subsequently the cell came to be regarded as a naked mass of protoplasm with a nucleus, and to this unit the name of protoplast was given. The true nature of the limiting membrane of the protoplast was discovered by Overton (1895). The plasmodesmata or connective strands that sometimes connect cells were prob- ably first seen by Hartig, in sieve-plates (1837). They are best regarded from the point of view of their functions in particular cases. They do not provide evidence for the view that the whole of a multicellular organism is basically a protoplasmic unit. Two or more nuclei in a continuous mass of protoplasm appear to have been seen for the first time in 1802, by Bauer. That an organism may consist wholly of a syn- cytium was discovered in i860, in the Mycetozoa.
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying Principles of Biology - Advanced
    Unifying Principles of Biology - Advanced Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. Niamh Gray-Wilson Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) AUTHORS Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other Niamh Gray-Wilson interactive content, visit www.ck12.org CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-source, collaborative, and web-based compilation model, CK-12 pioneers and promotes the creation and distribution of high-quality, adaptive online textbooks that can be mixed, modified and printed (i.e., the FlexBook® textbooks). Copyright © 2016 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Joseph Achille Le Bel. His Life and Works
    Revista CENIC. Ciencias Químicas ISSN: 1015-8553 [email protected] Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Cuba Wisniak, Jaime Joseph Achille Le Bel. His Life and Works Revista CENIC. Ciencias Químicas, vol. 33, núm. 1, enero-abril, 2002, pp. 35-43 Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas La Habana, Cuba Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181625999008 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista CENIC Ciencias Químicas, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2002. RESEÑA BIOGRAFICA Joseph Achille Le Bel. His Life and Works Jaime Wisniak Department of Chemical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel 84105. [email protected]. Recibido: 26 de abril del 2001. Aceptado: 22 de mayo del 2001. Palabras clave: Le Bel, Química, estereoquímica, actividad óptica, cosmogonia Key words: Le Bel, Chemistry, stereoquímica, optical activity, cosmogony. RESUMEN. Joseph Achille Le Bel es un ejemplo de científicos como Réaumur The same year his father passed que investigaron muchÍsimos temas, pero solo son recordados por uno. Le Bel away and his two sisters, Marie and es un nombre bien conocido por los estudiantes de Química en general, y Emma, took charge of the family in- estereoquímica en particular. El nos dejo los principios básicos que determinan dustry and in this way allowed Le las condiciones geométricas que un compuesto de carbón debe satisfacer para Bel to continue chemical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology (BIOL) 1
    Biology (BIOL) 1 Biology (BIOL) Courses BIOL 0848. DNA: Friend or Foe. 3 Credit Hours. This course is typically offered in Fall. Through the study of basic biological concepts, think critically about modern biotechnology. Consider questions like: What are the ethical and legal implications involving the gathering and analysis of DNA samples for forensic analysis and DNA fingerprinting? Are there potential discriminatory implications that might result from the human genome project? What are embryonic stem cells, and why has this topic become an important social and political issue? Will advances in medicine allow humans to live considerably longer, and how will a longer human life span affect life on earth? We will learn through lectures, lecture demonstrations, problem solving in small groups and classroom discussion, and make vivid use of technology, including short videos from internet sources such as YouTube, electronic quizzes, imaging and video microscopy. NOTE: This course fulfills a Science & Technology (GS) requirement for students under GenEd and the Science & Technology Second Level (SB) requirement for students under Core. Students cannot receive credit for this course if they have successfully completed Biology 0948. Course Attributes: GS Repeatability: This course may not be repeated for additional credits. BIOL 0948. Honors DNA: Friend or Foe. 3 Credit Hours. This course is not offered every year. Through the study of basic biological concepts, think critically about modern biotechnology. Consider questions like: What are
    [Show full text]
  • Chemists and the School of Nature Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Yves Bouligand, Hervé Arribart, Clément Sanchez
    Chemists and the School of nature Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Yves Bouligand, Hervé Arribart, Clément Sanchez To cite this version: Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Yves Bouligand, Hervé Arribart, Clément Sanchez. Chemists and the School of nature. Central European Journal of Chemistry, Springer Verlag, 2002, pp.1-5. hal- 00937207 HAL Id: hal-00937207 https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00937207 Submitted on 30 Jan 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Chemists and the school of nature B. Bensaude Vincent, Arribart, H., Bouligand, Y, Sanchez C.), New Journal of Chemistry, 26 (2002) 1-5. The term biomimicry first appeared in 1962 as a generic term including both cybernetics and bionics1. It referred to all sorts of imitation of one form of life by another one while the term "bionics" defined as "an attempt to understand sufficiently well the tricks that nature actually uses to solve her problems"2 is closer to the meaning of "biomimicry" as it has been used by material scientists since the 1980s. Biomimetism is an umbrella covering a variety of research fields ranging from the chemistry of natural products to nanocomposites, via biomaterials and supramolecular chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Atomism and Cell Theory
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2010) 202–211 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Biological atomism and cell theory Daniel J. Nicholson ESRC Research Centre for Genomics in Society (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St. Germans Road, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK article info abstract Keywords: Biological atomism postulates that all life is composed of elementary and indivisible vital units. The activ- Biological atomism ity of a living organism is thus conceived as the result of the activities and interactions of its elementary Cell theory constituents, each of which individually already exhibits all the attributes proper to life. This paper sur- Organismal theory veys some of the key episodes in the history of biological atomism, and situates cell theory within this Reductionism tradition. The atomistic foundations of cell theory are subsequently dissected and discussed, together with the theory’s conceptual development and eventual consolidation. This paper then examines the major criticisms that have been waged against cell theory, and argues that these too can be interpreted through the prism of biological atomism as attempts to relocate the true biological atom away from the cell to a level of organization above or below it. Overall, biological atomism provides a useful perspective through which to examine the history and philosophy of cell theory, and it also opens up a new way of thinking about the epistemic decomposition of living organisms that significantly departs from the phys- icochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Descriptions
    COURSE DESCRIPTIONS ABR 1103 Basic Metal Repair I (3-0-3) construction using frame alignment equipment will be The straightening, alignment, and fitting of major panels is provided. The fundamentals of welding, heating, cutting, taught. Procedures necessary to rough, shrink, bump, and and shaping are included. Prerequisite: ABR 1203 Body finish are included. Emphasis in this course is on theory and Frame Alignment I. and practical application. Safety is emphasized. ABR 2702 Painting and Estimating II (2-0-2) ABR 1202 Application Lab I (0-4-2) This course is a continuation of ABR 1302 (Painting and This is a practical application lab that supports course Estimating I) with emphasis on practical application. This objectives for ABR 1103 (Basic Metal Repair I), ABR 1203 course includes skills and technical knowledge in the (Body and Frame Alignment I), and ABR 1302 (Painting preparation of metal for paint, chemical stripping of old and Estimating I). finishes, use and maintenance of spray painting equipment, mixing and spraying of all types of automotive finishes, ABR 1203 Body and Frame Alignment I (3-0-3) and identification of common materials used. Safety is Students will receive instruction in the use of frame emphasized. Prerequisite: ABR 1302 Painting and equipment and frame construction, sectioning, and Estimating straightening. Experience working with unitized construction using frame alignment equipment will be ABR 2905 Related Body Repair (0-10-5) provided. The fundamentals of welding, heating, cutting, This course includes the removal and replacement of glass, and shaping are included. Emphasis in this course is on trim, electrical wiring, and the repair of plastic components.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit One – What Did People Think Caused Disease?
    Unit One – What did people think caused disease? Medieval beliefs about causes Renaissance beliefs about causes 1 Hippocrates An Ancient Greek philosopher who came up with theory of the 10 Four Blood, Phlegm, Black Bile, Yellow Bile – Four elements which Four Humours. Humours medieval people believed all humans had and could cause disease if they were not balanced. 2 Four Humours Blood, Phlegm, Black Bile, Yellow Bile – Four elements which 11 Theory of Galen’s theory that diseases were caused by the Four medieval people believed all humans had and could cause Opposites Humours being in‐balanced. Treated by re‐balancing the disease if they were not balanced. Four Humours. 3 Four elements Earth, fire, water, air – the four earthly elements that the four 12 Divine The belief that diseases were caused by God as punishment humours were based on. causes for sins people had committed. 4 Galen A Roman doctor who built on Hippocrates’ idea, the Four 13 Supernatural The belief that diseases are caused by magic or witchcraft Humours. causes 5 Theory of Galen’s theory that diseases were caused by the Four Humours 14 Miasma The belief that diseases are caused by bad smells / ‘foul Opposites being in‐balanced. Treated by re‐balancing the Four Humours. smelling air’. 6 Divine causes The belief that diseases were caused by God as punishment for 15 William Discovered the heart was a pump (pumped blood around the sins people had committed. Harvey body) important new ideas about causes in later periods. 7 Sins A religious belief that any bad things you do in your life are 16 The Plague – During the Great Plague 1665, many stayed indoors to avoid sinful and you will be punished by God for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to The
    SIMB News News magazine of the Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology April/May/June 2019 V.69 N.2 • www.simbhq.org Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to the Present :ŽƵƌŶĂůŽĨ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůDŝĐƌŽďŝŽůŽŐLJΘŝŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ Impact Factor 3.103 The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology is an international journal which publishes papers in metabolic engineering & synthetic biology; biocatalysis; fermentation & cell culture; natural products discovery & biosynthesis; bioenergy/biofuels/biochemicals; environmental microbiology; biotechnology methods; applied genomics & systems biotechnology; and food biotechnology & probiotics Editor-in-Chief Ramon Gonzalez, University of South Florida, Tampa FL, USA Editors Special Issue ^LJŶƚŚĞƚŝĐŝŽůŽŐLJ; July 2018 S. Bagley, Michigan Tech, Houghton, MI, USA R. H. Baltz, CognoGen Biotech. Consult., Sarasota, FL, USA Impact Factor 3.500 T. W. Jeffries, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 3.000 T. D. Leathers, USDA ARS, Peoria, IL, USA 2.500 M. J. López López, University of Almeria, Almeria, Spain C. D. Maranas, Pennsylvania State Univ., Univ. Park, PA, USA 2.000 2.505 2.439 2.745 2.810 3.103 S. Park, UNIST, Ulsan, Korea 1.500 J. L. Revuelta, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 1.000 B. Shen, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA 500 D. K. Solaiman, USDA ARS, Wyndmoor, PA, USA Y. Tang, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA E. J. Vandamme, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium H. Zhao, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA 10 Most Cited Articles Published in 2016 (Data from Web of Science: October 15, 2018) Senior Author(s) Title Citations L. Katz, R. Baltz Natural product discovery: past, present, and future 103 Genetic manipulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis for improved production in Streptomyces and R.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine Paul Nicolas Franchimont 1844-1919 (Leiden) and Charles Adolphe Wurtz 1817-1884 (Strasbourg) Barrett Honors College Chemistry 113 Footnote 18 Project Pamela T
    Antoine Paul Nicolas Franchimont 1844-1919 (Leiden) and Charles Adolphe Wurtz 1817-1884 (Strasbourg) Barrett Honors College Chemistry 113 Footnote 18 Project Pamela T. Hoang November 21, 2003 Antoine Paul Nicolas Franchimont (1844-1919) was appointed to the position of professor of chemistry at The Leiden Institute of Chemistry in 1874 along with J.M. van Bemmelen (Driessen). The Leiden University has boasted a proud, venerable reputation of chemistry since it was founded in 1575. Approximately 300 years later, Franchimont became the first chair of organic chemistry in Europe at Leiden. He received his Ph.D. in 1871 at the young age of 27. Three years later, Franchimont was promised a “new laboratory, but he had to wait twenty-seven years before he could move into a new building in the Hugo de Grootstraat” (Driessen). After the new laboratory opened in 1918, Franchimont unfortunately died a year later; however, chemistry flourished in the laboratories in the centre of Leiden for approximately seventy years. The number of students increased from one or two per year to about one hundred in the late 1960’s (Driessen). Franchimont is also credited with co-discovering triphenylmethane and anthraquinone. In addition, he also studied the acylation of sugars and cellulose, nitroamino compounds, and the chemistry of hydrogen azide, urea, urethanes, nitric acid, and oxalic acid (Bachas). Lastly he is attributed to discovering "tetryl," which was a widely, popular explosive in the early 1900s (Bachas). Charles Adolphe Wurtz (1817-1884) 2 It was once said, “Chemistry has perhaps the most intricate, most fascinating, and certainly most romantic history of all the sciences” by Dr.
    [Show full text]