Lmington, Delaware Christopher A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lmington, Delaware Christopher A Case 20-10166-JTD Doc 1403 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 71 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 LUCKY’S MARKET PARENT COMPANY, Case No. 20-10166 (JTD) LLC, et al.,1 (Jointly Administered) Debtors. Re: Docket No. 1397 DEBTORS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ENTRY OF AN ORDER CONFIRMING THE SECOND AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF LIQUIDATION OF LUCKY’S MARKET PARENT COMPANY, LLC AND ITS DEBTOR AFFILIATES Dated: December 22, 2020 POLSINELLI PC Wilmington, Delaware Christopher A. Ward (Del. Bar No. 3877) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1101 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 252-0920 Facsimile: (302) 252-0921 [email protected] -and- Liz Boydston (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 2950 N. Harwood, Suite 2100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 661-5557 [email protected] Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are Lucky’s Market Parent Company, LLC (2055), Lucky’s Farmers Market Holding Company, LLC (5480), Lucky’s Market Operating Company, LLC (7064), LFM Stores LLC (3114), Lucky’s Farmers Market, LP (0828), Lucky’s Farmers Market Resource Center, LLC (7711), Lucky’s Market Holding Company 2, LLC (0607), Lucky’s Market GP 2, LLC (9335), Lucky’s Market 2, LP (8384), Lucky’s Market of Longmont, LLC (9789), Lucky’s Farmers Market of Billings, LLC (8088), Lucky’s Farmers Markets of Columbus, LLC (3379), Lucky’s Farmers Market of Rock Hill, LLC (3386), LFM Jackson, LLC (8300), Lucky’s Farmers Market of Ann Arbor, LLC (4067), Lucky’s Market of Gainesville, LLC (7877), Lucky’s Market of Bloomington, LLC (3944), Lucky’s Market of Plantation, LLC (4356), Lucky’s Market of Savannah, GA, LLC (1097), Lucky’s Market of Traverse, City, LLC (2033), Lucky’s Market of Naples, FL, LLC (8700), Sinoc, Inc. (0723), Lucky’s Farmers Market of Ellisville, LLC (2875), and Lucky’s Farmers Market of Lexington, KY, LLC (3446). 74235093.5 Case 20-10166-JTD Doc 1403 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 71 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preliminary Statement ..................................................................................................................... 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 2 A. General Background ........................................................................................................... 2 (i) Section 363 Sales .............................................................................................. 5 (ii) Claim Reconciliation ........................................................................................ 6 (iii) WARN Act Class Action Adversary Proceeding ............................................. 7 (iv) ATA Litigation.................................................................................................. 8 (v) Winn-Dixie Adversary Proceeding ................................................................... 8 (vi) Executory Contracts and Leases ....................................................................... 9 (vii) Exclusivity Period Extensions ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. B. The Plan and Disclosure Statement Process ..................................................................... 10 Argument ...................................................................................................................................... 13 A. The Plan Meets the Bankruptcy Code’s Requirements and Should be Approved ........... 13 (i) Section 1129(a)(1): The Plan Complies With the Applicable Provisions of the Bankruptcy Code ............................................................................................ 14 (ii) Section 1122: The Classifications Are Appropriate ....................................... 14 (iii) Section 1123(a): The Plan’s Content is Appropriate ...................................... 18 (iv) Section 1123(b): The Plan Contains Certain Permissible Provisions ............. 19 (a) The Global Settlement is an Integral Component of the Plan and Should be Approved Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019 .......................................... 20 (1) Applicable Legal Standard ............................................................ 22 (2) Balancing the Possibility of Success in Litigation and Future Benefits of the Global Settlement Favors the Global Settlement . 25 (3) Difficulty in Collection ................................................................. 26 (4) Complexity of Litigation............................................................... 27 (5) The Global Settlement is in the Paramount Interests of Creditors 28 (b) The Plan Releases are Appropriate and Should be Approved .................. 28 (1) Debtor Releases ............................................................................ 29 (2) Third Party Releases ..................................................................... 36 (c) The Plan’s Injunction and Exculpation Provisions are Appropriate and Should be Approved ................................................................................. 38 (v) Section 1129(a)(2): The Plan Complies With the Bankruptcy Code .............. 41 (vi) Section 1129(a)(3): The Plan Has Been Proposed in Good Faith .................. 43 i 74235093.5 Case 20-10166-JTD Doc 1403 Filed 12/22/20 Page 3 of 71 (vii) Section 1129(a)(4): The Plan Provides for Approval of Certain Administrative Expenses ......................................................................................................... 45 (viii) Section 1129(a)(5): The Plan Contains Proper Disclosures ........................... 46 (ix) Section 1129(a)(6): No Governmental Regulatory Commission Has Jurisdiction Over the Debtors ......................................................................... 46 (x) Section 1129(a)(7): The Plan is in the Best Interest of All Creditors ............. 47 (xi) Section 1129(a)(8): The Plan Has Been Accepted by Impaired Voting Classes ......................................................................................................................... 49 (xii) Section 1129(a)(9): The Plan Provides for Payment in Full of Allowed Priority, Administrative, and Tax Claims ....................................................... 50 (xiii) Section 1129(a)(10): At Least One Class of Impaired Classes Has Accepted the Plan............................................................................................................ 50 (xiv) Section 1129(a)(11): The Plan is Feasible ...................................................... 50 (xv) Section 1129(a)(12): All Fees Have Been or Will be Paid ............................. 52 (xvi) Section 1129(a)(13) Through Section 1129(a)(16) Do Not Apply to the Plan52 (xvii) Section 1129(b): The Plan Satisfies the “Cram Down Requirements”........... 53 (xviii) Section 1129(c) Through Section 1129(e) Have Been Satisfied .................... 56 B. Substantive Consolidation. ............................................................................................... 56 (i) Prepetition Disregard of Separateness ............................................................ 59 (ii) Postpetition Commingling .............................................................................. 60 C. Objections ......................................................................................................................... 61 D. A Waiver of Any Stay of Confirmation is Appropriate .................................................... 61 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 62 ii 74235093.5 Case 20-10166-JTD Doc 1403 Filed 12/22/20 Page 4 of 71 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases In re 203 N. LaSalle St. Ltd. P’ship., 190 B.R. 567 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1995), rev’d on other grounds, 526 U.S. 434 (1999) .......................................................................................................................................53 In re Abeinsa Holding, Inc., 562 B.R. 265 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016) ........................................................................................58 In re Adelphia Commc’ns, Corp., 368 B.R. 140 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007) .....................................................................................47 In re Armstrong World Indus., 320 B.R. 523 (D. Del. 2005) ....................................................................................................54 In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 348 B.R. 111 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006) ........................................................................................14 In re Avia Energy Dev., LLC, Case No. 05-39339 (BJH), 2007 WL 2238039 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2007) ........................................................................................................................................15 Bank of Am. Nat’l Trust & Savings Assoc. v. 203 N. LaSalle St. Partnership, 526 U.S. 434 (1999) .................................................................................................................47 In re Bowles, 48 B.R. 502 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1985) ........................................................................................54 In re Briscoe Enters, Ltd., 994 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir. 1993) .................................................................................................51 In re Brotby, 303 B.R. 177 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2003)........................................................................................51
Recommended publications
  • Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents
    Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents Top 250 quick statistics 4 Global economic outlook 5 Top 10 highlights 8 Impact of COVID-19 on leading global retailers 13 Global Powers of Retailing Top 250 17 Geographic analysis 25 Product sector analysis 32 New entrants 36 Fastest 50 38 Study methodology and data sources 43 Endnotes 47 Contacts 49 Acknowledgments 49 Welcome to the 24th edition of Global Powers of Retailing. The report identifies the 250 largest retailers around the world based on publicly available data for FY2019 (fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020), and analyzes their performance across geographies and product sectors. It also provides a global economic outlook, looks at the 50 fastest-growing retailers, and highlights new entrants to the Top 250. Top 250 quick statistics, FY2019 Minimum retail US$4.85 US$19.4 revenue required to be trillion billion among Top 250 Aggregate Average size US$4.0 retail revenue of Top 250 of Top 250 (retail revenue) billion 5-year retail Composite 4.4% revenue growth net profit margin 4.3% Composite (CAGR Composite year-over-year retail FY2014-2019) 3.1% return on assets revenue growth 5.0% Top 250 retailers with foreign 22.2% 11.1 operations Share of Top 250 Average number aggregate retail revenue of countries where 64.8% from foreign companies have operations retail operations Source: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Global Powers of Retailing 2021. Analysis of financial performance and operations for fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020 using company annual reports, press releases, Supermarket News, Forbes America’s largest private companies and other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Resource
    Center for Food and Agricultural Business CAB CS 15.1 September 1, 2015 Online Food Shopping: Peapod Finds a Path “Mike, the evidence is clear: Nearly every single technical innovation—from PCs to digital music and mobile phones—has struggled at first with low sales for a long period of time before reaching an inflection point, then rising exponentially. E-commerce is following that principle. We are on the cusp of rapid acceleration.” Andrew Parkinson, founder and president of Peapod, the online grocery company, did not have to convince Mike Brennan, Peapod’s Chief Operating Officer, that Peapod was poised for growth. Grocery was the biggest category in retailing but had proved the most resistant to the advance of online shopping. Nevertheless, Parkinson and Brennan had worked side by side for 18 years to keep Peapod, the nation’s oldest online grocer, in the fore of technological innovation and consumer relevance. They had watched with a certain fascination as many hopeful online food startups had been launched to great fanfare, only soon to fail. If not always profitable in its early years, Peapod had stood the test of time. But despite the hefty investments made and industry-leading status, a new brand of competition was entering the online marketplace and the rules of the game were shifting rapidly. Peapod’s parent company, Royal Dutch Ahold, was one of the world’s largest supermarket companies with 2014 sales of $43.5 billion and more than 3,500 stores.1 Yet most of these stores were conventionally positioned and, in both its European home market and in the US, its historic market shares were being eroded by new competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Online Grocery Shopping & Delivery Solutions
    100 100 95 95 75 75 25 25 5 5 0 0 100 100 95 95 75 75 25 25 5 5 0 0 OhioGrocer_3rdQtr_2017_Cover-Final Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:17:07 AM The Online Movement: OFFICERS Grocers RYAN HUFFMAN, Chair Huffman’s Market Upper Arlington, OH Dream or PHILL ADAMS, Vice Chair, Membership Jungle Jim’s International Market Fairfield, OH Nightmare? GARY BAKER, Vice Chair, Operations Baker’s Management, Inc. Newcomerstown, OH ED CALLIHAN, Vice Chair, Government Affairs SpartanNash Lima, OH BRIAN FERRIER, Vice Chair, Annual Events Giant Eagle, Inc. Lewis Center, OH DAN SALTZMAN, Member-at-Large Dave’s Supermarkets The OhioGROCER magazine is owned and published by: Ohio Grocers Association Bedford Heights, OH 1335 Dublin Road, Suite 30A; Columbus, Ohio 43215-1000 RON GRAFF, JR. , Past Chairman Columbiana Foods, Inc. T 614.442.5511 F 614.441.4292 www.ohiogrocers.org Youngstown, OH An award-winning publication of the Ohio Grocers Association KRISTIN MULLINS President & CEO, OGA Columbus, OH DIRECTORS: KEITH BALLINGER TABLE OF CONTENTS: Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. ADVERTISERS: LEO BRAIDO Braido Foods American Seaway Foods DON CASTER PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 3 Raisin Rack Natural Food Market Associated Wholesale GARY CRAWFORD Laurel Grocery Company Grocers ANGELA CROCK STATEHOUSE NEWS 4 Caldwell Food Center CareWorks BILL CROSSET Crosset Company MIKE DAVIDSON WASHINGTON REVIEW 5 Intralot/Ohio Lottery Buehler’s Food Markets LARRY D’ONOFRIO Mr. D’s Delicious Fresh Foods Reiter Dairy MICHAEL GEORGE ONLINE INDUSTRY: 7 Kelly’s Market, Inc. E.J. GEYER Industry Response to the Online Takeover Shelf Scouter Geyer’s Markets, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Omni Channel Retailing State of the Union
    2012 Omni Channel Retailing State of the Union Bill Davis Director MB&G Consulting [email protected] www.omnichannelretailing.com +1 207.766.8696 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................... 3 2011 Top 100 Retailers - Company Information .................. 5 Omni Channel Retailing Capability #1 - Buy Online, Pickup in Store (BOPiS) ............................. 9 Omni Channel Retailing Capability #2 - Buy in Store, Initiate Return Online (BiSIRO) .............. 23 Conclusion .......................................................................... 34 INTRODUCTION In the history of retail, its hard to imagine a more dynamic period than the last ~20 years. With the birth of eCommerce in late summer of 19941, traditional brick & mortar retailers have seen their businesses being pressured by threats they didn’t see coming, understand, underestimated or just plain ignored. Amazon has gone from $0 - $60B+ in fiscal 2012, 25%+ growth from 2011, in less than 20 years. And while eCommerce revenues were only ~5.4% of all retail revenues in 20122, they are growing exponentially so I don’t think anyone would be surprised if the percentage was 15%+ by 2020. Facing that type of pressure on their existing business, its no surprise they are looking for solutions beyond just growing their eCommerce presence. And the current answer appears to be Omni Channel Retailing3 as it represents the best opportunity for brick & mortar retailers to leverage their existing sales channels (e.g. stores,
    [Show full text]
  • 03 29 1990.Pdf
    j6 ,,u,ii ,,.3OJ5ßfJOf)fr,TtI3tSDA%,tM.4RClh59, 1990 u,tAE'l7 o,, s ews st. John Brebeuf MG resident receives George BOWLING basketball team awarded Huff Award Lee Wolochock, of 7044 Pos- ter SI., Morose Grove, has re-st. John Brebeuf crived a1990 George Hoff SJB Holy Name Award that hoeors Uoiversity of Ladies Bowling Society Illieois athletes for outstandiegTeam W-L Scores olMarcis 23, 1990 achievement in both athletics andCoca Cola 62-22 academics. Plaques were present- Sprile 54-30 ed the hoeorees at halftime of theGreen River 51-33 Team lllieois-Perdne mees basketball 50-34 Pointe Sunkist Wiedemann Insurance 51 1/2 game je the Assembly Halbe theJolt 50-34 Chwopaige-Urbaoa campeo. Anderson Secretarial 50 7-Up 47-37 Dr. Tom Drozdz, DDS Lee tottered in mccc gymeas- 47-37 48 1/2 Batrelhead Mrs-wood Federal Sao. 47 tics while studying in the CollegePepsi 40-44 :: Northwest Parishes cr4, ï .#' ofEegieeerieg, where he attained - 39. 50-50 37-47 SkajaTerracepuit,Home35 averages of4.46l and 4.352 dur-Hawaiian Punch 34-50 G GITE Beierwaltes State . 34 iug his past two semesters (basedDiet Rite 33-51 lS Farm Innerance . .I M1fh5,. 005.) 3 1-53 Bubble Up .-- utiu, 29-553&BSheetMetaltsgfg. 31 Scsitl a ' 'a Manischewitz "'f5 Qn Sunday, l-ebruary 18, Si. John Brebeut hoidtheir Mountain Dew 23-61 Mcinischewitz Men's A - - Sports Banquet. The gym was decorated and a catered meal Fruit Flavored I 9 Macaroons was served. A guest speaker was in attendance: Doug Bruno, Basketball High Series Top Bowlers Slices Head Coach ofDePaulUniversityfor Women's Basketball.
    [Show full text]
  • Orlowski V. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc
    Orlowski v. Dominick's Finer Foods United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division August 22, 1995, Decided ; August 28, 1995, DOCKETED Case No. 95 C 1666 Reporter: 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12468; 1995 WL 516595 HELENE ORLOWSKI, MELBA J. KOCH, MARGARET promotional opportunities, work assignments, maintaining MROZOWSKI, CAROL ANN SCHMALL, ALMA L. sex-segregated job categories and refusal to provide training AGUIRRE, ROANN D. KEATY, on behalf of themselves to qualify [*2] them for more desirable work opportunities. and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Plaintiffs seek to certify a class of Defendant's female and DOMINICK'S FINER FOODS, INC., Defendant. Hispanic employees as an appropriate class pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Complaint Subsequent History: [*1] Motion for Reconsideration asserts that a class of female--past, present and future-- Denied September 7, 1995, Reported at: 1995 U.S. Dist. employees of Defendant located throughout the State of LEXIS 13197. Illinois is appropriate for certification. The Amended Complaint added Defendant's Hispanic employees as Counsel: Jeffrey Irvine Cummings, DAVIS, MINER, members of the proposed class. BARNHILL and GALLAND, P.C., Chicago, IL, Representing Plaintiffs. Defendant's Organizational Structure Jeffrey Mark Friedman, FRIEDMAN & HOLMAN, Chicago, Defendant operates a chain of 85 retail food stores within the IL, Representing Plaintiffs. State of Illinois. It has its headquarters in Northlake, Illinois and employs approximately 15,000 employees. Each store has Mark Andrew Lies, II, SEYFARTH, SHAW, a store manager and co-manager, as well as a department FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Chicago, IL, manager for its deli, seafood, meat, produce, grocery, bakery, Representing Defendant.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Franklin Park Transit Oriented Development Study
    Village of Franklin Park Transit Oriented Development Study January 6, 2006 Village of Franklin Park Transit Oriented Development Study Prepared for the Village of Franklin Park by S. B. Friedman & Company The Lakota Group Metro Transportation Group, Inc. January 6, 2006 This document summarizes work conducted for the Village of Franklin Park’s Transit Oriented Development Study. This document was prepared by S. B. Friedman & Company, under contract to the Village of Franklin Park. Preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant from the Regional Transportation Authority, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, under the Federal Transit Act, and/or the Illinois Department of Transportation. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Regional Transportation Authority, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, or the Illinois Department of Transportation. January 26, 2006 Mr. Jeffery A. Eder Dir. of Economic Development & Planning Village of Franklin Park 9500 Belmont Avenue Franklin Park, IL 60131 Dear Mr. Eder: Pursuant to our agreement, the consulting team of S. B. Friedman & Company, The Lakota Group, and Metro Transportation Group is pleased to present this final Transit Oriented Development Study to the Village of Franklin Park. In preparing the study, we assessed opportunities for physical development and transportation improvements in relation to the market potential of the downtown and Metra station area. The plan includes market findings and a potential development program that highlights specific priority projects and action steps. The planning process included extensive research and analysis as well as public forums that included residents, business owners, community leaders, and elected and appointed officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Publix Supermarkets, Inc
    Publix Supermarkets, Inc. January 2018 Written by Jeffrey S. Harrison, Morgan Owdom, Duncan Pitchford, Alex Stratton and Brian Warren at the Robins School of Business, University of Richmond. Copyright © Jeffrey S. Harrison. This case was written for the purpose of classroom discussion. It is not to be duplicated or cited in any form without the copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeff Harrison at [email protected]. In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/case-network.html Shortly after being named as CEO in 2016, the Publix Board of Directors authorized Todd Jones to move forward with opening ten new stores in the highly competitive Richmond, Virginia market.1 The company’s expansions out of its home market of Florida have paid off handsomely so far, with Publix now a close number 3 in market share in Georgia and gaining on its competition in Tennessee.2 Stressing service and a unique store experience, Jones believed Publix would remind Richmond shoppers of the now-shuttered, service-oriented Ukrop’s Super Markets and allow the company to quickly gain market share at the expense of its grocery nemeses, Walmart and Kroger. However, Richmond also marked the first time Publix would face Wegmans, a grocer with a similar background and focus on service, as well as a new European arrival, Lidl.3 Would the expansion work? COMPANY BACKGROUND George Jenkins opened the first Publix supermarket in Winter Haven, Florida on September 6, 1930, in the midst of the Great Depression.4 The story of Publix’s inception has become corporate lore, an anecdote to explain the company’s devotion to its employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution & Revolution in Food Retailing
    Evolution & Revolution in Food Retailing Tom Gillpatrick Center for Retail Leadership Center Portland State University February 24, 2014 [email protected] http://www.pdx.edu/retail-leadership/ Students! Executive Education Today’s Managers: Tomorrows Leaders 2014 20 years , 621 alumni, Skamania Lodge Albertsons: 58 C&K: 14 Cash & Carry: 11 Franz: 36 Fred Meyer: 64 Haggen: 18 Mission foods: 21 Nestle: 11 P&G: 18 QFC: 30 Safeway: 38 Tillamook: 11 Unified: 55 Winco: 7 Also: Costco, Henningsen, Western Family, New Seasons, Ralphs, Pepsi, Hy-Vee and others! Agenda • An Industry with Tradition of Constant Evolution • Key Retail Industry Trends • Consumer Shopping Trends • Selected Implications & Conclusion Food Retailing in USA: A Story of Innovation & Evolution YYesterdayesterday TodayToday Top Retail Food Trends Top Trends in Retail Food Industry Continued Consolidation & Channel Blurring Fragmentation of Shoppers & Formats Small Footprint Stores on the Move Growth in value retailers and high touch retailers Consumer Shopping Behavior is Changing Alternative Delivery comes of Age: Online & Mobile Healthcare and wellness becomes more important Expanding Demand for Food Internationally Globalization of Retail Global Retail Consolidation Top 100 Retailers Global market share - 1998 15% - 2008 25% - 2018 40% Emerging markets are seen as key to growth strategies More companies are evolving from International to global growth strategies Concentation Ratio’s for the U.S. Retail Food Industry 1992-2009 9 Top 10 Grocery Retailers Today 1980 1990 1999 1 Safeway Am. Stores Kroger Wal-Mart 2 Kroger Kroger Walmart Kroger 3 A & P Safeway Albertsons Costco 4 Lucky A & P Safeway Target 5 Winn Dixie Winn Dixie Ahold Safeway/ABS 6 Am.
    [Show full text]
  • Kroger Fact Book
    2016 Kroger Fact Book ABOUT THE KROGER FACT BOOK This Fact Book provides certain financial and operating information about The Kroger Co. (Kroger) and its consolidated subsidiaries. It is intended to provide general information about Kroger and therefore does not include the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes. On January 22, 2003, the SEC issued release No. 33- 8176 that set forth new requirements relating to the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures, as defined in the release. The release allows for presentation of certain non- GAAP financial measures provided that the measures are reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Any non-GAAP financial measure discussed in this Fact Book complies with this requirement. More detailed financial information can be found in Kroger’s filings with the SEC. This Fact Book includes forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Information regarding factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Kroger’s filings with the SEC. Kroger believes that the information contained in this Fact Book is correct in all material respects as of April 2017 or such earlier date as indicated. However, such information is subject to change. Unless otherwise noted, reference to “years” is to Kroger’s fiscal years. All share and per share amounts are reflective of the two-for-one stock split of Kroger common shares in July 2015. The Kroger Co. Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Retail Industry Insights 2016
    Industry Insights: Food Retail Industry Insights – 2016 Highlights Traditional food retailers, facing increased pressure from alternative Merchandisers are changing assortment, providing more channels, are testing new concepts to retain market share. shelf space to prepared foods for take away and home meal replacements. Natural and organic supermarkets, while continuing to trade at a premium to traditional food retailers, are fighting to maintain traffic. Stiff competition, evolving consumer preferences and a challenging organic growth environment are driving food The U.S. Hispanic population is growing exponentially, which is retailers to consider strategic alternatives, including M&A, to influencing national consumption patterns. optimize capital allocation and pursue growth opportunities. Food Retail Industry Insights – 2016 Table of Contents Food Retail Industry Insights ............................................................................................................................. 3 Selected Food Retail M&A Activity ............................................................................................................... 7 Selected Food Retail M&A Transactions .................................................................................................. 8 Selected Publicly Traded Food Retail Companies ............................................................................. 9 Selected Recent Duff & Phelps Food Retail Transactions .......................................................... 10 Duff & Phelps
    [Show full text]
  • RISING STARS 2018 Top Women in Grocery
    COVER FEATURE RISING STARS 2018 Top Women in Grocery Danielle Bunch Kimberly Cowen Director of Sales, Regional Manager, Enterprise Strategy, Advantage Rising Stars Advantage Solutions Solutions To help increase Bunch provided EBITDA, Cowen crucial leadership and strategic stepped in to offer her organiza- direction as some Advantage tional skills for major events and Solutions employees became activations such as the Meijer SAS Retail Services employees, LPGA Classic and Back to Col- ensuring that the transition went lege events. smoothly by holding 200-plus meetings with individual suppliers She maintains a regular and associates to communicate presence in stores and at events, the path forward and the added doing whatever’s needed, benefits of the partnership. whether it’s event prep, setup or cleanup, to help the team and She gained responsibility for her company. the retail analytics team, working with its leader to implement This past January, Cowen was new processes and technology given several additional responsi- enhancements to gain operation- bilities, including crafting weekly al efficiencies for the sales and client updates, summarizing retail teams. field execution, and highlighting key operational initiatives driving Bunch created the first web- innovation and creativity to meet based vendor portal for the Advantage’s platform annual largest retailer, giving it real-time EBITDA and revenue goals. visibility to results. Kelli Ficke Jennifer Gruber Brooke Heintz Amanda King Senior Category Senior Director, Client Service Sales
    [Show full text]